[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

AIM – Ability Improvement Model

  • Conference paper
Software Process Improvement (EuroSPI 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 3792))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Too many improvement and innovation projects fail. We have studied characteristics of successful and failed projects. From this study we derived 19 parameters that influence success and failure. We used the parameters to build an Ability Improvement Model (AIM), which is a model that can be used to measure an organizations or a projects ability to succeed with improvement. After having build AIM we tested it in real life in a large organization, learned from the experience and improved the model. Then we tested it again in two organizations with promising results. In the paper we report on the considerations and research behind AIM. Finally we describe the method, and how the model can be used in practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 35.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 44.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goldenson, D.R., Hersleb, J.D.: After the Appraisal: A systematic Survey of Process Improvement, its Benefits, and Factors that Influence Success. Technical Report CMU/SEI-95-TR-009. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  2. El-Emam, K., et al.: Modelling the Likelihood of Software Process Improvement: An Exploratory Study. Empirical Software Engineering, vol. 6, pp. 207–229. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blanco, M., et al.: SPI Patterns: Learning from Experience. IEEE Software, 28–35 (May/June 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rainer, A., Hall, T.: Key success factors for implementing software process improvement: a maturity-based analysis. The Journal of Systems and Software 62, 71–84 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Robert, G.: Successful Software process improvement. Pentice Hall PTR (1997) ISBN: 0-13-626623-1

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zahran, S.: Software Process Improvement – Practical Guidelines for Business Success. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1998) ISBN 0-201-17782-X

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stelzer, D., Mellis, W.: Success Factors of Organizational Change in Software Process Improvement. Software Process Improvement and Practice  4(4) (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dybå, T.: An Instrument for Measuring the Key Factors of Success in Software Process Improvement. Empirical Software Engineering, vol. 5, pp. 357–390. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Strauss, A., Corbin, J.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Strauss, A., Corbin, J.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hevner, A., March, S., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 75–106 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kuvaja, P., Similä, J., Krzanik, L., Bicego, A., Saukkonen, S., Koch, G.: Software Process Assessment & Improvement. The BOOTSTRAP Approach. Blackwell Publishers, Malden (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Galliers, R.: Choosing Information Systems Research Approaches. In: Galliers, R. (ed.) Information Systems research. Blackwell scientific Publications, Oxford (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Susman, G., Evered, R.: An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Administrative Science Quarterly 23(4), 582–603 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chrissis, M.B., Konrad, M., Shrum, S.: CMMI – Guidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pries-Heje, J., Johansen, J. (2005). AIM – Ability Improvement Model. In: Richardson, I., Abrahamsson, P., Messnarz, R. (eds) Software Process Improvement. EuroSPI 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3792. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11586012_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11586012_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-30286-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32271-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics