Consumer-centric factors for the implementation of smart meters in South Africa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18489/sacj.v33i2.909Keywords:
Smart meter, consumer-centric, perceived usefulness, perceived value, behavioural intention, structural equation model, trust in technology, privacy risk, facilitating conditions, social normsAbstract
Smart meter implementation is still in its infancy in many African countries, including South Africa. This is evident from the fact that most research studies are either Eurocentric or American-centric. Hence, this research aimed to identify consumer-centric factors for planning considerations in implementation of smart meters in South Africa. We used various behavioural theoretical models found in literature to identify potential factors relevant to this study. Based on quantitatively gathered data (n = 705), a structural equation model (SEM) was used to evaluate the identified factors. This study found that only ten consumer-centric factors were significant to smart meter consumers. These factors include behavioural intention, attitude, trust in technology, social norms, facilitating conditions, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, privacy risk, monetary cost, and perceived value. In conclusion, the study shows that not all factors suggested within the European and American context are relevant for smart meter implementation within the South African context. Hence, results of this study hold some practical implications in assisting utility companies in identifying consumer-centric factors that are relevant to the South African population. Finally, consumer-centric factors can be used by policy makers and energy regulators as baseline factors for future pervasive technology acceptance studies.
References
Agarwal, N., Wang, Z., & Xu, Y. (2007). Factors affecting 3G adoption: An empirical study. PACIS 2007 Proceedings, 256–277. http://www.pacis-net.org/file/2007/1205.pdf
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J.Beckman(Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior. Springer.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2),179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Alharbi, S., & Drew, S. (2014). Using the technology acceptance model in understanding academics’ behavioural intention to use learning management systems. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 5(1),143–155.
Atkins, P. (2014). Smart meters and smart-enabled prepaid meters project [Department of Economic Development and Tourism, Western Cape Government].
Bamberg, S., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2003). Choice of travel mode in the theory of planned behavior: The roles of past behavior, habit, and reasoned action. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25(10),175–187. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324834BASP2503_01
Bargh, J.A.,& McKenna, K.Y.A.(2004).The internal and social life. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 573–590. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141922
Barrett, J., Peters, G., Wiedmann, T. O., Scott, K., Lenzen, M., Roelich, K., Quéré, L., & C.(2013). Consumption-based GHG emission accounting: A UK case study. Climate Policy,13, 451–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2013.788858
Bazilian, M., Welsch, M., Divan, D., Elzinga, D., Strbac, G., Howells, M., Jones, L., Keane, A.,Gielen, D., Balijepalli, V. S. K. M., Brew‐Hammond, A., & Yumkella, K. (2013). Smart and just grids for sub-Saharan Africa: Exploring options. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 20, 336–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.004
Belanche, D., Casado,L.V., & Flavián, C. (2012). Integrating trust and personal values into the Technology Acceptance Model: the case of e-government services adoption. Cuadernosde Economía y Dirección de la Empresa,15(4), 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cede.2012.04.004
Beldad, A., & Hegner, S. (2018). Expanding the technology acceptance model with the inclusion of trust, social influence, and health valuation to determine the predictors of German users’ willingness to continue using a fitness app: A structural equation modeling approach. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction,34(9), 882–893. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1403220
Bugden, D.,& Stedman, R.(2018). A synthetic view of acceptance and engagement with smart meters in the United States. Energy Research and Social Science, 47, 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.08.025
Camarinha-Matos, L. (2016). Collaborative smart grids – A survey on trends. Renewable and Ssustainable Energy Reviews, 65, 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.093
Chen, C., Fan, Y.,& Farn, C. (2007). Predicting electronic toll collection service adoption: An integration of the technology acceptance model and the theory of planned behavior.Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies,15(5),300–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2007.04.004
Chen, S., Chen, H., & Chen, M. (2009). Determinants of satisfaction and continuance intention towards self-service technologies. Industrial Management and Data Systems,109(9),1248–1263. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570911002306
Chen, S., Li, S., & Li, C. (2011). Recent related research in technology acceptance model: A literature review. Australian Journal of Business and Management Research, 1(9), 124–127.
Cheon, J., Lee, S., Crooks, S.M., & Song, J. (2012). An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior. Computers and Education, 59(3), 1054–1064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.015
Cuijpers, C., & Koops, B. (2013). Smart metering and privacy in Europe: Lessons from the Dutch case. In G.S., L.R., deHert P., & P.Y. (Eds.), European data protection: Coming of age. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5170-5_1
Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., & Warshaw,P.R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8).
Davis, L. E., Ajzen, I., Saunders, J., & Williams, T. (2002). The decision of African American students to complete high school: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 810–819. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.810
Dileep, G. (2019). A survey on smart grid technologies and applications. Renewable Energy,146,2589–2625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.08.092
Dinev, T., Bellotto, M., Hart, P., Russo, V., & Colautti, C. (2006). Privacy calculus model in e-commerce — A study of Italy and the United States. European Journal of Information Systems,15(4),389–402. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000590
Dinev,T., & Hart,P. (2006). An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions. Information Systems Research,17(1),61–80. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0080
Doney, P. M., & Cannon, J. P. (1997). An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 61(2),35–51.
Eberhard, A., Gratwick, K., Morella, E., & Antmann, P. (2017). Independent power projects in sub-Saharan Africa: Investment trends and policy lessons. Energy Policy, 108, 390–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.023
Faruqui, A., Harris, D., & Hledik, R. (2010). Unlocking the €53 billion savings from smart meters in the EU: How increasing the adoption of dynamic tariffs could make or break the EU’s smart grid investment. Energy Policy, 38(10),6222–6231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.06.010
Fathema, N., Shannon, D., & Ross, M. (2015). Expanding the technology acceptance model (TAM) to examine faculty ease of learning management systems (LMSs) in higher education institutions. MERLOT Journal of online learning and teaching,11(2),210–232.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley.
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Inexperience and experience with online stores: The importance of TAM and trust. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50(3), 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2003.817277
Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (2000). The relative importance of perceived ease of use in IS adoption: A study of e-commerce adoption. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 1(8), 1–30.
Ghalandari, K. (2012). The effect of performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence and facilitating conditions on acceptance of e-banking services in Iran: The moderating role of age and gender. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research,12(6),801–807. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2012.12.6.2536
Gu, J. C., Lee, S. C., & Suh, Y. H. (2009). Determinants of behavioral intention to mobile banking. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(9), 11605–11616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.03.024
Guo, C., Bond, C., & Narayanan, A. (2015). The adoption of new smart-grid technologies: Incentives, outcomes, and opportunities [Last accessed 10 Dec 2021]. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/199/1/012062
Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., & Anderson, R.E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th). PrenticeHall.
Hair, J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). Pls-SEM or CB-SEM: Updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmda.2017.10008574
Han, L., Chen, W., Zhuang, B., & Shen, H.(2017). A review on development practice of smart grid technology in China. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Volume 199. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/199/1/012062
Hazen, B. T., Overstreet, R. E., & Wang, Y. (2015). Predicting public bicycle adoption using the technology acceptance model. Sustainability, 7(14558–14573). https://doi.org/10.3390/su71114558
Holden, R. J., & Karsh, B. (2010). The technology acceptance model: Its past and its future in health care. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 43(1), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2009.07.002
James,T.L., Warkentin,M., & Collignon, S.E. (2015). A dual privacy decision model for online social networks. Information and Management, 52(8), 893–908.
Jay, D., Hmielowski, B., D., A., Harvey, G., & Joo, J. (2019). The social dimensions of smart meters in the UnitedStates: Demographics. Energy Research and Social Science, 55,189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.05.003
Joubert, J., & van Belle, J. (2013). The role of trust and risk in mobile commerce adoption within South Africa. International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, 3(2),27–38. http://www.ijbhtnet.com/journals/Vol%5C_3%5C_No%5C_2%5C_February%5C_2013/3.pdf
Kaushik, A. K., Agrawal, A. K., & Rahman, Z. (2015). Tourist behaviour towards self-service hotel technology adoption: Trust and subjective norm as key antecedents. Tourism Management Perspectives,16,278–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2015.09.002
Keith, M.J., Thompson, S.C., Hale, J., Benjamin, P., & Greer, C. (2013). Information disclosure on mobile device: Re-examining privacy calculus with actual user behavior. Journal of Human Computer Studies, 71(12), 1163–1173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2013.08.016
Kim, Y. J., Chun, J., & Song, J. (2009). Investigating the role of attitude in technology acceptance from an attitude strength perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 29(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2008.01.011
Kranz, J., Gallenkamp, J., & Picot, A. (2010). Exploring the role of control–smart meter acceptance of residential consumers. AMCIS 2010 Proceedings, Paper 315. https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2010/315
Kranz, J., Kolbe, L.M., Koo, C., & Boudreau, M.C. (2015). Smart energy: Where do we stand and where should we go? Electronic markets, 25(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-015-0180-3
Kranz, J. J., & Picot, A. (2011). Toward an end-to-end smart grid: Overcoming bottlenecks to facilitate competition and innovation in smart grids. Communications of the National Regulatory Research Institute,138.
Krasnova, H., & Veltri, N.F. (2010). Privacy calculus on social networking sites: Explorative evidence from Germany and USA. 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1–10., 1–10.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610.
Lai, P. (2017). The literature review of technology adoption models and theories for the novelty technology. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management,14(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.4301/S1807-17752017000100002
Lee, M. (2009). Factors influencing the adoption of Internet banking: An integration of TAM and TPB with perceived risk and perceived benefit. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 8(10), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2008.11.006
Lu, H., & Gustafson, H. (1994). An empirical study of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on computerized support system use over time. International Journal of Information Management,14(5), 317–329.
Lynne, G.D., Casey, C.F., Hodges, A., & Rahmani, M. (1995). Conservation technology adoption decisions and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology,16.
Ma, Z., Asmussen, A., & Jørgensen, B. N. (2018). Industrial consumers’ smart grid adoption: Influential factors and participation phases. Energies,11(1),182.
Maduku, D.K. (2013). Predicting retail-banking customers’ attitude towards Internet banking services in SouthAfrica. South African Business Review,17(3), 76–100.
Manyika, J., Chui, M., Bughin, J., Dobbs, R., Bisson, P., & Marrs, A. (2013). Disruptive technologies: Advances that will transform life, business, and the global economy [McKinsey Global Institute]. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/disruptive-technologies
Martins, C., Oliveira, T., & Popovič, A. (2014). Understanding the Internet banking adoption: A unified theory of acceptance and use of technology and perceived risk application. International Journal of Information Management, 34, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.06.002
Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H., & Schoorman, F.C. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.
McKenna, E., Richardson, I., & Thomson, M. (2012). Smart meter data: Balancing consumer privacy concerns with legitimate applications. Energy Policy, 41, 807–814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.049
McKnight, D., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research,13(3), 334–359.
Micheni, E.M., Lule, I., & Muketha, G.M. (2013). Transaction costs and facilitating conditions as indicators of the adoption of mobile money services in Kenya. International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, 2(5), 9–15.
Miltgen, L.C., Popovič, A., & Oliveira, T. (2013a). Determinants of end-user acceptance of biometrics: Integrating the“Big3”of technology acceptance with privacy context. Decision Support Systems, 56(1), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2013.05.010
Miltgen, L.C., Popovič, A., & Oliveira, T. (2013b). Determinants of end-user acceptance of bio-metrics: Integrating the“Big3”of technology acceptance with privacy context. Decision Support Systems, 56(1), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2013.05.010
Moon, J., & Kim, Y. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information and Management, 38(4), 217–230.
Morosan, C., & DeFranco, A. (2015). It’s about time: Revisiting UTAUT2 to examine consumers’ intentions to use NFC mobile payments in hotels. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 53(10),17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.11.003
Muller-Seitz, G., Dautzenberg, K., Creusen, U.,& Stromereder, C. (2009). Customer acceptance of RFID technology: Evidence from the German electronic retail sector. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 16(1), 31–39.
Notani, A. (1998). Moderators of perceived behavioral control’s predictiveness in the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(3), 247–271.Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2012). Green growth studies: Energy [Last accessed 10 Dec 2021]. https://www.oecd.org/greengrowth/greening-energy/49157219.pdf
Orlando, D., & Vandevelde, W. (2021). Smart meters’ roll out, solutions in favour of a trust enhancing law in the EU. Journal of Law, Technology and Trust, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.19164/jltt.v2i1.1071
Park, S. Y. (2009). An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning. Educational Technology and Society,12(3),150–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-009-3513-0
Ponce-Jara, M. A., Ruiz, E., Gil, R., Sancristóbal, E., Pérez-Molina, C., & Castro, M. (2017). Smart grid: Assessment of the past and present in developed and developing countries. Energy Strategy Reviews,18,38–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2017.09.011
Rausser, G., Strielkowski, W., & Štreimikienė, D. (2018). Smart meters and household electricity consumption: A case study in Ireland. Energy and Environment, 29(1), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X17741385
Rehman, T., Yates, C. M., McKemey, K., Garforth, C., Cooke, R., Tranter, R. B., Park, J., & Dorward,P.(2003). Modelling the uptake of new technologies on dairy farms in South West England using the Theory of Reasoned Action and mathematical programming. Agricultural Economics Society conference, Seale Hayne, England.
Roca, J.C., Garcia, J.J.,& delaVega, J.J. (2009). The importance of perceived trust, security and privacy in online trading systems. Information Management and Computer Security,17(2), 96–113. https://doi.org/10.1108/09685220910963983
Sánchez-Prieto, J., Olmos-Migueláñez, S., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2015). Informal tools informal contexts: Development of a model to assess the acceptance of mobile technologies among teachers. Computers in Human Behaviour,55,519–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.002
Serenko, A., Bontis, N., & Detlor, B. (2007). End-user adoption of animated interface agents in everyday work applications. Behaviour and Information Technology, 26(2), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290500260538
Smart Energy International. (2019). The factors behind low smart meter penetration in Africa [Last accessed 10 Dec 2021]. https://www.smart-energy.com/industry-sectors/policy-regulation/the-factors-behind-low-smart-meter-penetration-africa
Srivastava, J., & Moreland, J. J. (2012). Diffusion of innovations: Communication evolution and influences.The Communication Review, 15(40), 294–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2012.728420
Stern, B., Royne, M. B., Stafford, F. T., & Bienstock, C. C. B. (2008). Consumer acceptance of online auctions: An extension and revision of the TAM. Psychology and Marketing, 25(10), 619–636. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20228
Sun, Y., Wang, N., Shen, X., & Zhang, J. (2015). Computers in human behavior location information disclosure in location-based social network service: Privacy calculus, benefit structure, and gender differences. Computers in Human Behavior,52, 278–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.006
Tan, X., Qin, L., Kim, Y.,& Hsu, J. (2012). Impact of privacy concern in social networking websites. Interne tResearch, 22(2), 211–233. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241211214575
Taneja, A., Vitrano, J., & Gengo, N. J. (2014). Rationality-based beliefs affecting individual’s attitude and intention to use privacy controls on Facebook: An empirical investigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.027
Ten Kate, S., Haverkamp, S., Mahmood, F., & Feldberg, F. (2010). Social network influences on technology acceptance: A matter of tie strength, centrality and density. 23rd BledeConference,18–32.
Teo, T. (2009). The impact of subjective norm and facilitating conditions on pre-service teachers’ attitude toward computer use: A structural equation modeling of an extended technology acceptance model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 40(1), 89–109. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.40.1.d
Thatcher, J., McKnight, D., Baker, E., Arsal, R. E., & Roberts, N. H. (n.d.). The role of trust in post adoption IT exploration: An empirical examination of knowledge management systems. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 58, 56–70.
Thomas, T.D., Singh, L., & Gaffar, K. (2013). The Utility of the UTAUT model in explaining mobile learning adoption in higher education in Guyana. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 9(3), 71–85.
Uitz, I., & Koitz, R. (2013). Consumer acceptance of location based services in the retail environment. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 4(12).
Vallerand, R.J., Pelletier, L.G., Blais, M.R., Brière, N.M., Senécal, C., & Vallières, E.F. (1992). The academic motivation scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52,1003–1019.
van Ittersum, K., Rogers, W.A., Caine, K.E., O’Brien, M.A., & Parsons, L.J. (2006). Understanding technology acceptance: Phase 1 – Literature Review and Qualitative Model Development [Technology Report HFATR-0602]. Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Psychology, Human Factors and Aging Laboratory. http://hdl.handle.net/1853/40580
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J.Y.L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.
Wang, Y., Chen, Q., Hong, T., & Kang, C. (2019). Review of smart meter data analytics: Applications, methodologies, and challenge. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 10(3), 3125–3148. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2018.2818167
Willis, T. (2009). An evaluation of the technology acceptance model as a means of understanding online social networking behavior. World Economic Forum. (2012). Energy for economic growth. Hydrocarbon Processing [Last accessed 10 Dec 2021]. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_EN_EnergyEconomicGrowth_IndustryAgenda_2012.pdf
World Economic Forum. (2016). The future of electricity in fast-growing economies attracting investment to provide affordable, accessible and sustainable power [Last accessed 10 Dec 2021]. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Electricity_2016.pdf
Wu, I. L., & Chen, J. L. (2005). An extension of trust and TAM model with TPB in the initial adoption of online tax: An empirical study. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62(6), 784–808.
Wunderlich, P., Veit, D., & Sarker, S. (2012). Adoption of information systems in the electricity sector: The issue of smart metering.18th Americas Conference on Information Systems 2012, AMCIS 2012, 3669–3678.
Xiong, S. (2013). Adoption of mobile banking model based on perceived value and trust. 2013 6th International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering, 632–635.
Xu, H., Robert, X., Carroll, J.M., Beth, M., Luo, X., Carroll, J.M., & Rosson, M.B. (2011). The personalization privacy paradox: An exploratory study of decision-making process for location-aware marketing. Decision Support Systems, 51(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.11.017
Zamrudi, Z., Karim, S., Faridha, M., Maharani, D., & Kuraesin, A. (2019). Smart meter adoption: The role of consumer experience in using smart device. Journal of Physics: Conference Series,1175. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1175/1/012038
Zeithaml, A.V. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200302
Zhou, S. (2021). The effect of smart meter penetration on dynamic electricity pricing: Evidence from the United States. The Electricity Journal, 34(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2021.106919
Zhou, S., & Brown, M.A. (2017). Smart meter deployment in Europe: A comparative case study on the impacts of national policy schemes. Journal of Cleaner Production,144, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.031
Zhou, T. (2011). The impact of privacy concern on user adoption of location‐based services. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 111(2), 212–226. https://doi.org/doi:10.1108/02635571111115146
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Tonderai Muchenje, Reinhardt Botha
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.