[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter February 18, 2023

Robust Finite Element Discretization and Solvers for Distributed Elliptic Optimal Control Problems

  • Ulrich Langer ORCID logo , Richard Löscher , Olaf Steinbach ORCID logo EMAIL logo and Huidong Yang

Abstract

We consider standard tracking-type, distributed elliptic optimal control problems with L 2 regularization, and their finite element discretization. We are investigating the L 2 error between the finite element approximation u ϱ h of the state u ϱ and the desired state (target) u ¯ in terms of the regularization parameter 𝜚 and the mesh size ℎ that leads to the optimal choice ϱ = h 4 . It turns out that, for this choice of the regularization parameter, we can devise simple Jacobi-like preconditioned MINRES or Bramble–Pasciak CG methods that allow us to solve the reduced discrete optimality system in asymptotically optimal complexity with respect to the arithmetical operations and memory demand. The theoretical results are confirmed by several benchmark problems with targets of various regularities including discontinuous targets.

MSC 2010: 49J20; 49M05; 35J05; 65M60; 65M15; 65N22

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the computing support of the supercomputer MACH-2 (https://www3.risc.jku.at/projects/mach2/) from Johannes Kepler Universität Linz and of the high performance computing cluster Radon1 (https://www.oeaw.ac.at/ricam/hpc) from Johann Radon Institute for Computational and Applied Mathematics (RICAM) on which the numerical examples are performed.

References

[1] O. Axelsson, M. Neytcheva and A. Ström, An efficient preconditioning method for state box-constrained optimal control problems, J. Numer. Math. 26 (2018), no. 4, 185–207. 10.1515/jnma-2017-0047Search in Google Scholar

[2] M. Benzi, G. H. Golub and J. Liesen, Numerical solution of saddle point problems, Acta Numer. 14 (2005), 1–137. 10.1017/S0962492904000212Search in Google Scholar

[3] A. Borzi and V. Schulz, Multigrid methods for PDE optimization, SIAM Rev. 51 (2009), no. 2, 361–395. 10.1137/060671590Search in Google Scholar

[4] J. H. Bramble and J. E. Pasciak, A preconditioning technique for indefinite systems resulting from mixed approximations of elliptic problems, Math. Comp. 50 (1988), no. 181, 1–17. 10.1090/S0025-5718-1988-0917816-8Search in Google Scholar

[5] S. C. Brenner and L. R. Scott, The Mathematical Theory of Finite Element Methods, Texts Appl. Math. 15, Springer, New York, 2008. 10.1007/978-0-387-75934-0Search in Google Scholar

[6] H. C. Elman, D. J. Silvester and A. J. Wathen, Finite Elements and Fast Iterative Solvers: With Applications in Incompressible Fluid Dynamics, Numer. Math. Sci. Comput., Oxford University, New York, 2005. 10.1093/oso/9780198528678.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[7] A. Ern and J.-L. Guermond, Theory and Practice of Finite Elements, Appl. Math. Sci. 159, Springer, New York, 2004. 10.1007/978-1-4757-4355-5Search in Google Scholar

[8] G. H. Golub and C. F. Van Loan, Matrix Computations, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, 1996. Search in Google Scholar

[9] W. Hackbusch, Iterative Solution of Large Sparse Systems of Equations, Appl. Math. Sci. 95, Springer, Cham, 2016. 10.1007/978-3-319-28483-5Search in Google Scholar

[10] M. Jung and U. Langer, Applications of multilevel methods to practical problems, Surveys Math. Indust. 1 (1991), no. 3, 217–257. Search in Google Scholar

[11] M. Jung, U. Langer, A. Meyer, W. Queck and M. Schneider, Multigrid preconditioners and their applications, Third Multigrid Seminar (Biesenthal 1988), Rep. MATH 89, Karl-Weierstrass-Institut, Berlin (1989), 11–52. Search in Google Scholar

[12] J. Kraus and M. Wolfmayr, On the robustness and optimality of algebraic multilevel methods for reaction-diffusion type problems, Comput. Vis. Sci. 16 (2013), no. 1, 15–32. 10.1007/s00791-014-0221-zSearch in Google Scholar

[13] U. Langer, O. Steinbach and H. Yang, Robust discretization and solvers for elliptic optimal control problems with energy regularization, Comput. Methods Appl. Math. 22 (2022), no. 1, 97–111. 10.1515/cmam-2021-0169Search in Google Scholar

[14] J.-L. Lions, Optimal Control of Systems Governed by Partial Differential Equations, Grundlehren Math. Wiss. 170, Springer, New York, 1971. 10.1007/978-3-642-65024-6Search in Google Scholar

[15] K.-A. Mardal and R. Winther, Preconditioning discretizations of systems of partial differential equations, Numer. Linear Algebra Appl. 18 (2011), no. 1, 1–40. 10.1002/nla.716Search in Google Scholar

[16] F. Natterer, Error bounds for Tikhonov regularization in Hilbert scales, Appl. Anal. 18 (1984), no. 1–2, 29–37. 10.1080/00036818408839508Search in Google Scholar

[17] M. Neumüller and O. Steinbach, Regularization error estimates for distributed control problems in energy spaces, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 44 (2021), no. 5, 4176–4191. 10.1002/mma.7021Search in Google Scholar

[18] Y. Notay, A new analysis of block preconditioners for saddle point problems, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 35 (2014), no. 1, 143–173. 10.1137/130911962Search in Google Scholar

[19] Y. Notay, Convergence of some iterative methods for symmetric saddle point linear systems, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 40 (2019), no. 1, 122–146. 10.1137/18M1208836Search in Google Scholar

[20] M. A. Olshanskii and A. Reusken, On the convergence of a multigrid method for linear reaction-diffusion problems, Computing 65 (2000), no. 3, 193–202. 10.1007/s006070070006Search in Google Scholar

[21] C. C. Paige and M. A. Saunders, Solutions of sparse indefinite systems of linear equations, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 12 (1975), no. 4, 617–629. 10.1137/0712047Search in Google Scholar

[22] J. W. Pearson and A. J. Wathen, A new approximation of the Schur complement in preconditioners for PDE-constrained optimization, Numer. Linear Algebra Appl. 19 (2012), no. 5, 816–829. 10.1002/nla.814Search in Google Scholar

[23] T. Rees and M. Stoll, Block-triangular preconditioners for PDE-constrained optimization, Numer. Linear Algebra Appl. 17 (2010), no. 6, 977–996. 10.1002/nla.693Search in Google Scholar

[24] J. Schöberl and W. Zulehner, Symmetric indefinite preconditioners for saddle point problems with applications to PDE-constrained optimization problems, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 29 (2007), no. 3, 752–773. 10.1137/060660977Search in Google Scholar

[25] V. Schulz and G. Wittum, Transforming smoothers for PDE constrained optimization problems, Comput. Vis. Sci. 11 (2008), no. 4–6, 207–219. 10.1007/s00791-008-0094-0Search in Google Scholar

[26] O. Steinbach, Numerical Approximation Methods for Elliptic Boundary Value Problems: Finite and Boundary Elements, Springer, New York, 2008. 10.1007/978-0-387-68805-3Search in Google Scholar

[27] V. Thomée, Galerkin Finite Element Methods for Parabolic Problems, Springer Ser. Comput. Math. 25, Springer, Berlin, 1997. 10.1007/978-3-662-03359-3Search in Google Scholar

[28] F. Tröltzsch, Optimal Control of Partial Differential Equations, Grad. Stud. Math. 112, American Mathematical Society, Providence, 2010. 10.1090/gsm/112/07Search in Google Scholar

[29] W. Zulehner, Analysis of iterative methods for saddle point problems: A unified approach, Math. Comp. 71 (2002), no. 238, 479–505. 10.1090/S0025-5718-01-01324-2Search in Google Scholar

[30] W. Zulehner, Nonstandard norms and robust estimates for saddle point problems, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 32 (2011), no. 2, 536–560. 10.1137/100814767Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-07-09
Revised: 2022-12-08
Accepted: 2023-01-24
Published Online: 2023-02-18
Published in Print: 2023-10-01

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 1.2.2025 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cmam-2022-0138/html
Scroll to top button