More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

Scalable, resilient, and configurable permissioned blockchain fabric

Authors:

Sajjad Rahnama,

Thamir M. Qadah,

Jelle Hellings,

Mohammad SadoghiAuthors Info & Claims

Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, Volume 13, Issue 12

Pages 2893 - 2896

https://doi.org/10.14778/3415478.3415502

Published: 01 August 2020 Publication History

Abstract

With the advent of Bitcoin, the interest of the database community in blockchain systems has steadily grown. Many existing blockchain applications use blockchains as a platform for monetary transactions, however. We deviate from this philosophy and present ResilientDB, which can serve in a suite of non-monetary data-processing blockchain applications. Our ResilientDB uses state-of-the-art technologies and includes a novel visualization that helps in monitoring the state of the blockchain application.

References

[1]

M. J. Amiri, D. Agrawal, and A. E. Abbadi. CAPER: A cross-application permissioned blockchain. PVLDB, 12(11):1385--1398, 2019.

Digital Library

[2]

E. Androulaki et al. Hyperledger Fabric: A distributed operating system for permissioned blockchains. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth EuroSys Conference, pages 30:1--30:15. ACM, 2018.

Digital Library

[3]

A. Bessani, J. Sousa, and E. E. Alchieri. State machine replication for the masses with BFT-SMART. In 44th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks, pages 355--362. IEEE, 2014.

Digital Library

[4]

E. Buchman, J. Kwon, and Z. Milosevic. Revisiting fast practical byzantine fault tolerance, 2018.

[5]

M. Castro and B. Liskov. Practical byzantine fault tolerance and proactive recovery. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 20(4):398--461, 2002.

Digital Library

[6]

B. F. Cooper, A. Silberstein, E. Tam, R. Ramakrishnan, and R. Sears. Benchmarking cloud serving systems with YCSB. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing, pages 143--154. ACM, 2010.

Digital Library

[7]

T. T. A. Dinh, R. Liu, M. Zhang, G. Chen, B. C. Ooi, and J. Wang. Untangling blockchain: A data processing view of blockchain systems. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 30(7):1366--1385, 2018.

[8]

Eyal, A. E. Gencer, E. G. Sirer, and R. V. Renesse. Bitcoin-NG: A scalable blockchain protocol. In 13th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, pages 45--59, Santa Clara, CA, 2016. USENIX Association.

Digital Library

[9]

G. Greenspan. Multichain private blockchain, 2015.

[10]

S. Gupta, J. Hellings, S. Rahnama, and M. Sadoghi. Proof-of-Execution: Reaching Consensus through Fault-Tolerant Speculation. abs/1911.00838, 2019.

[11]

S. Gupta, J. Hellings, and M. Sadoghi. Brief announcement: Revisiting consensus protocols through wait-free parallelization. In 33rd International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2019), volume 146, pages 44:1--44:3, 2019.

[12]

S. Gupta, J. Hellings, and M. Sadoghi. Scaling blockchain databases through parallel resilient consensus paradigm. abs/1911.00837, 2019.

[13]

S. Gupta, S. Rahnama, J. Hellings, and M. Sadoghi. ResilientDB: Global scale resilient blockchain fabric. PVLDB, 13(6):868--883, 2020.

Digital Library

[14]

S. Gupta, S. Rahnama, and M. Sadoghi. Permissioned blockchain through the looking glass: Architectural and implementation lessons learned. In 40th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems. IEEE, 2020.

[15]

J. Hellings and M. Sadoghi. Brief announcement: The fault-tolerant cluster-sending problem. In 33rd International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2019), volume 146, pages 45:1--45:3, 2019.

[16]

J. Hellings and M. Sadoghi. Coordination-free byzantine replication with minimal communication costs. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Database Theory, volume 155, 2020.

[17]

J. Katz and Y. Lindell. Introduction to Modern Cryptography. Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2nd edition, 2014.

Digital Library

[18]

R. Kotla, L. Alvisi, M. Dahlin, A. Clement, and E. Wong. Zyzzyva: Speculative byzantine fault tolerance. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 27(4):7:1--7:39, 2009.

Digital Library

[19]

Libra Association Members. An introduction to libra, 2019.

[20]

S. Nakamoto. Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system, 2009.

[21]

G. Wood. Ethereum: a secure decentralised generalised transaction ledger, 2016. EIP-150 revision.

[22]

M. Yin, D. Malkhi, M. K. Reiter, G. G. Gueta, and I. Abraham. HotStuff: BFT consensus with linearity and responsiveness. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, pages 347--356. ACM, 2019.

Digital Library

Cited By

Gupta SRahnama SPandey SCrooks NSadoghi MFedorova ANarayanan DDi Luna GQuerzoni L(2023)Dissecting BFT Consensus: In Trusted Components we Trust!Proceedings of the Eighteenth European Conference on Computer Systems10.1145/3552326.3587455(521-539)Online publication date: 8-May-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3552326.3587455
Gomez Rivera ATosh DGhosh U(2022)Resilient sensor authentication in SCADA by integrating physical unclonable function and blockchainCluster Computing10.1007/s10586-021-03413-125:3(1869-1883)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10586-021-03413-1

Recommendations

Permissionless and permissioned blockchain diffusion
Highlights
- A study of permissionless and permissioned blockchain diffusion.
- Permissioned blockchain diffusion is lagging well behind the diffusion of permissionless blockchains.
- Barriers and drivers of diffusion are different for each type of ...
Abstract
This paper explores the barriers and drivers of diffusion associated with permissionless and permissioned blockchains, seeking to establish whether they are the same or different and whether barriers and drivers change over time. The study was ...
Hands-on Permissioned Blockchain Platforms
FAMECSE '22: Proceedings of the Federated Africa and Middle East Conference on Software Engineering

Enterprise organizations spends a lot of time and money on establishing trust when shared date is presented to others and might rely on third parties. Blockchain technology helps organizations to solve this problem without the need for third parties. ...
Blockchain Technology Explained: The Simplified Guide On Blockchain Technology (2018) Blockchain Wallet, Blockchain Explained

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment

Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment Volume 13, Issue 12

August 2020

1710 pages

ISSN:2150-8097

Editors:
Magdalena Balazinska
University of Washington
,
Xiaofang Zhou
University of Queensland, Australia

Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

VLDB Endowment

Publication History

Published: 01 August 2020

Published in PVLDB Volume 13, Issue 12

Qualifiers

Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

2
Total Citations
View Citations
256
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)11
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

Reflects downloads up to 04 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Gupta SRahnama SPandey SCrooks NSadoghi MFedorova ANarayanan DDi Luna GQuerzoni L(2023)Dissecting BFT Consensus: In Trusted Components we Trust!Proceedings of the Eighteenth European Conference on Computer Systems10.1145/3552326.3587455(521-539)Online publication date: 8-May-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3552326.3587455
Gomez Rivera ATosh DGhosh U(2022)Resilient sensor authentication in SCADA by integrating physical unclonable function and blockchainCluster Computing10.1007/s10586-021-03413-125:3(1869-1883)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10586-021-03413-1

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents