default search action
9th QoMEX 2017: Erfurt, Germany
- Ninth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience, QoMEX 2017, Erfurt, Germany, May 31 - June 2, 2017. IEEE 2017, ISBN 978-1-5386-4024-1
- Saeed Mahmoudpour
, Peter Schelkens
Reduced-reference image quality assessment based on internal generative mechanism utilizing shearlets and Rényi entropy analysis. 1-5 - Yucheng Zhu, Guangtao Zhai, Ke Gu, Wenhan Zhu:
No-reference quality assessment for JPEG compressed images. 1-6 - Yuming Fang, Jiebin Yan, Jiheng Wang:
No reference quality assessment for stereoscopic images by statistical features. 1-6 - Alexander Raake
A bitstream-based, scalable video-quality model for HTTP adaptive streaming: ITU-T P.1203.1. 1-6 - Emin Zerman, Vedad Hulusic
Effect of color space on high dynamic range video compression performance. 1-6 - Katy C. Noland, Manish Pindoria, Andrew Cotton:
Modelling brightness perception for high dynamic range television. 1-6 - Ana De Abreu, Cagri Ozcinar, Aljosa Smolic:
Look around you: Saliency maps for omnidirectional images in VR applications. 1-6 - Pradip Paudyal, Jesús Gutiérrez
Characterization and selection of light field content for perceptual assessment. 1-6 - Irene Viola
Impact of interactivity on the assessment of quality of experience for light field content. 1-6 - Péter A. Kara, Aron Cserkaszky
On the edge of the seat: Reduced angular resolution of a light field cinema with fixed observer positions. 1-6 - Ulrich Engelke, Huyen Nguyen
Quality of augmented reality experience: A correlation analysis. 1-3 - Michal Soloducha, Alexander Raake
Testing conversational quality of VoIP with different terminals and degradations. 1-3 - Steve Göring, Alexander Raake
A framework for QoE analysis of encrypted video streams. 1-3 - Anne-Flore Perrin
Towards the need satisfaction in gaming: A comparison of different gaming platforms. 1-3 - Xijie Zhang
Exploring users views on immersive adult entertainment applications. 1-3 - Yang Du, Daiki Sawada, Dorin Gutu, Yasuhiro Inazumi, Keiji Shibata, Yuukou Horita:
Preference identification for images using the change of the amount of blood in frontal lobe with NIRS. 1-3 - Hui Men, Hanhe Lin
Empirical evaluation of no-reference VQA methods on a natural video quality database. 1-3 - Dejan Bokan, Gordana Velikic
Blind DIBR-synthesized image quality assessment based on sparsity features in morphological multiscale domain. 1-3 - Kathrin Borchert, Matthias Hirth
Collecting subjective ratings in enterprise environments. 1-3 - Friedemann Köster, Gabriel Mittag, Sebastian Möller
Modeling the overall quality of experience on the basis of underlying quality dimensions. 1-6 - Jayant Gupchup, Yasaman Hosseinkashi, Martin Ellis
Analysis of problem tokens to rank factors impacting quality in VoIP applications. 1-6 - Najmeddine Majed, Stéphane Ragot, Xavier Lagrange, Alberto Blanc, Jercome Dufour, Guillaume Grao:
Experimental evaluation of WebRTC voice quality in LTE coverage tests. 1-6 - Hanne Stenzel, Philip J. B. Jackson
Speech reaction time measurements for the evaluation of audio-visual spatial coherence. 1-6 - Pablo Arnau-González
Perceptual video quality evaluation by means of physiological signals. 1-6 - Cambodge Bist, Rémi Cozot, Gérard Madec, Xavier Ducloux:
QoE-based brightness control for HDR displays. 1-6 - Niall Murray, Oluwakemi Adewunmi Ademoye, George Ghinea
Olfactory-enhanced multimedia video clips datasets. 1-5 - Lana Jalal, Maurizio Murroni
A nonlinear quality of experience model for high dynamic spatio-temporal mulsemedia. 1-6 - Chenyan Zhang
Spatial immersion versus emotional immersion, which is more immersive? 1-6 - Conor Keighrey
A QoE evaluation of immersive augmented and virtual reality speech & language assessment applications. 1-6 - Raimund Schatz
Towards subjective quality of experience assessment for omnidirectional video streaming. 1-6 - Ashutosh Singla, Stephan Fremerey, Werner Robitza, Alexander Raake
Measuring and comparing QoE and simulator sickness of omnidirectional videos in different head mounted displays. 1-6 - Yashas Rai, Patrick Le Callet, Philippe Guillotel:
Which saliency weighting for omni directional image quality assessment? 1-6 - Evgeniy Upenik
On the performance of objective metrics for omnidirectional visual content. 1-6 - Sebastian Möller, Friedemann Köster, Benjamin Weiss:
Modelling speech service quality: From conversational phases to communication quality and service quality. 1-3 - Falk Ralph Schiffner, Sebastian Möller:
Defining the relevant perceptual quality space for video and video-telephony. 1-3 - Clemens Schcoll, Sebastian Möller
Assessing the impact of inaccurate decision support systems on experts' behavior and decisions. 1-3 - Naty Ould Sidaty, Wassim Hamidouche, Olivier Déforges, Pierrick Philippe:
Emerging video coding performance: 4K quality monitoring. 1-3 - Katrien De Moor
Exploring diverse measures for evaluating QoE in the context of WebRTC. 1-3 - Florian Hammer
Position paper: Quality-of-experience of cyber-physical system applications. 1-3 - Ismael Gómez Miguelez, Paul D. Sutton, Avishek Nag
A software radio LTE network testbed for video quality of experience experimentation. 1-3 - Abhinau Kumar Venkataramanan
No-reference quality assessment of tone mapped High Dynamic Range (HDR) images using transfer learning. 1-3 - Pietro Lungaro, Konrad Tollmar:
QoE design tradeoffs for foveated content provision. 1-3 - Emanuela Maggioni
Measuring the added value of haptic feedback. 1-6 - Tobias Hoßfeld
No silver bullet: QoE metrics, QoE fairness, and user diversity in the context of QoE management. 1-6 - Andrew Hines
A framework for post-stroke quality of life prediction using structured prediction. 1-6 - Vlad Hosu
The Konstanz natural video database (KoNViD-1k). 1-6 - Péter A. Kara, Werner Robitza, Alexander Raake
The label knows better: The impact of labeling effects on perceived quality of HD and UHD video streaming. 1-6 - Michael Seufert
Unperturbed video streaming QoE under web page related context factors. 1-6 - Steven Schmidt
Towards the delay sensitivity of games: There is more than genres. 1-6 - Jari Korhonen:
Predicting personal preferences in subjective video quality assessment. 1-6 - Rafael Zequeira Jiménez, Laura Fernández Gallardo, Sebastian Möller
Scoring voice likability using pair-comparison: Laboratory vs. crowdsourcing approach. 1-3 - Mirko Suznjevic, Matija Mandurov, Maja Matijasevic:
Performance and QoE assessment of HTC Vive and Oculus Rift for pick-and-place tasks in VR. 1-3 - Olli Rummukainen, Sebastian J. Schlecht
Evaluation of binaural reproduction systems from behavioral patterns in a six-degrees-of-freedom wayfinding task. 1-3 - Evangelos Alexiou
On subjective and objective quality evaluation of point cloud geometry. 1-3 - Shahid M. Satti, Christian Schmidmer, Matthias Obermann, Roland Bitto, Lavita Agarwal, Michael Keyhl:
P.1203 evaluation of real OTT video services. 1-3 - Ines Saidi, Lu Zhang, Vincent Barriac, Olivier Déforges:
Evaluation of single-artifact based video quality metrics in video communication context. 1-3 - Neil Birkbeck, Chip Brown, Robert Suderman:
Quantitative evaluation of omnidirectional video quality. 1-3 - Shun-nan Yang, Ju Liu, Juliana Knopf, Hannah R. Colett, Philip J. Corriveau:
Assessment of lossy images with visual detection and saccadic eye movements. 1-3 - Nabajeet Barman
H.264/MPEG-AVC, H.265/MPEG-HEVC and VP9 codec comparison for live gaming video streaming. 1-6 - Pedro Casas
Predicting QoE in cellular networks using machine learning and in-smartphone measurements. 1-6 - Michael Seufert
Unsupervised QoE field study for mobile YouTube video streaming with YoMoApp. 1-6 - Werner Robitza, Marie-Neige Garcia, Alexander Raake
A modular HTTP adaptive streaming QoE model - Candidate for ITU-T P.1203 ("P.NATS"). 1-6
manage site settings
To protect your privacy, all features that rely on external API calls from your browser are turned off by default. You need to opt-in for them to become active. All settings here will be stored as cookies with your web browser. For more information see our F.A.Q.
last updated on 2024-12-19 22:21 CET by the dblp team
all metadata released as open data under CC0 1.0 license
see also: Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Imprint
dblp was originally created in 1993 at:
since 2018, dblp has been operated and maintained by:
the dblp computer science bibliography is funded and supported by: