• case-insensitive prefix search: default
  e.g., sig matches "SIGIR" as well as "signal"
• exact word search: append dollar sign ($) to word
  e.g., graph$ matches "graph", but not "graphics"
• boolean and: separate words by space
  e.g., codd model
• boolean or: connect words by pipe symbol (|)
  e.g., graph|network

Update May 7, 2017: Please note that we had to disable the phrase search operator (.) and the boolean not operator (-) due to technical problems. For the time being, phrase search queries will yield regular prefix search result, and search terms preceded by a minus will be interpreted as regular (positive) search terms.

found 39 matches

• 2021
• 
  Sefa Akca, Chao Peng, Ajitha Rajan:
  Testing Smart Contracts: Which Technique Performs Best? ESEM 2021: 21:1-21:11
• 
  Nikolaos Alexopoulos, Andrew Meneely, Dorian Arnouts, Max Mühlhäuser:
  Who are Vulnerability Reporters?: A Large-scale Empirical Study on FLOSS. ESEM 2021: 25:1-25:12
• 
  Florian Auer, Michael Felderer:
  Important Experimentation Characteristics: An Expert Survey. ESEM 2021: 29:1-29:6
• 
  Hamdy Michael Ayas, Philipp Leitner, Regina Hebig:
  Facing the Giant: a Grounded Theory Study of Decision-Making in Microservices Migrations. ESEM 2021: 16:1-16:11
• 
  Elizabeth Bjarnason, Franz Lang, Alexander Mjöberg:
  A Model of Software Prototyping based on a Systematic Map. ESEM 2021: 3:1-3:11
• 
  Kinga Bojarczuk, Natalija Gucevska, Simon M. M. Lucas, Inna Dvortsova, Mark Harman, Erik Meijer, Silvia Sapora, Johann George, Maria Lomeli, Rubmary Rojas:
  Measurement Challenges for Cyber Cyber Digital Twins: Experiences from the Deployment of Facebook's WW Simulation System. ESEM 2021: 2:1-2:10
• 
  Susanne Braun, Stefan Deßloch, Eberhard Wolff, Frank Elberzhager, Andreas Jedlitschka:
  Tackling Consistency-related Design Challenges of Distributed Data-Intensive Systems: An Action Research Study. ESEM 2021: 20:1-20:11
• 
  Danilo Caivano, Pietro Cassieri, Simone Romano, Giuseppe Scanniello:
  An Exploratory Study on Dead Methods in Open-source Java Desktop Applications. ESEM 2021: 10:1-10:11
• 
  Flávia Coelho, Nikolaos Tsantalis, Tiago Massoni, Everton L. G. Alves:
  An Empirical Study on Refactoring-Inducing Pull Requests. ESEM 2021: 9:1-9:12
• 
  Anna Corazza, Sergio Di Martino, Adriano Peron, Luigi Libero Lucio Starace:
  Web Application Testing: Using Tree Kernels to Detect Near-duplicate States in Automated Model Inference. ESEM 2021: 37:1-37:6
• 
  Dolors Costal, Carles Farré, Xavier Franch, Carme Quer:
  Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria in Software Engineering Tertiary Studies: A Systematic Mapping and Emerging Framework. ESEM 2021: 30:1-30:6
• 
  Roland Croft, Dominic Newlands, Ziyu Chen, Muhammad Ali Babar:
  An Empirical Study of Rule-Based and Learning-Based Approaches for Static Application Security Testing. ESEM 2021: 8:1-8:12
• 
  Pascal Gadient, Marc-Andrea Tarnutzer, Oscar Nierstrasz, Mohammad Ghafari:
  Security Smells Pervade Mobile App Servers. ESEM 2021: 19:1-19:10
• 
  Jiri Gesi, Jiawei Li, Iftekhar Ahmed:
  An Empirical Examination of the Impact of Bias on Just-in-time Defect Prediction. ESEM 2021: 7:1-7:12
• 
  Danielle Gonzalez, Paola Peralta Perez, Mehdi Mirakhorli:
  Barriers to Shift-Left Security: The Unique Pain Points of Writing Automated Tests Involving Security Controls. ESEM 2021: 11:1-11:12
• 
  Khalid Hasan, Partha Chakraborty, Rifat Shahriyar, Anindya Iqbal, Gias Uddin:
  A Survey-Based Qualitative Study to Characterize Expectations of Software Developers from Five Stakeholders. ESEM 2021: 4:1-4:11
• 
  Yuekai Huang, Junjie Wang, Song Wang, Zhe Liu, Dandan Wang, Qing Wang:
  Characterizing and Predicting Good First Issues. ESEM 2021: 13:1-13:12
• 
  Nasif Imtiaz, Seaver Thorn, Laurie A. Williams:
  A comparative study of vulnerability reporting by software composition analysis tools. ESEM 2021: 5:1-5:11
• 
  Fernando Kamei, Gustavo Pinto, Igor Wiese, Márcio Ribeiro, Sérgio Soares:
  What Evidence We Would Miss If We Do Not Use Grey Literature? ESEM 2021: 24:1-24:11
• 
  Vanessa Klotzman, Farima Farmahinifarahani, Cristina V. Lopes:
  Public Software Development Activity During the Pandemic. ESEM 2021: 18:1-18:12
• 
  Oleksandr Kosenkov, Michael Unterkalmsteiner, Daniel Méndez, Davide Fucci:
  Vision for an Artefact-based Approach to Regulatory Requirements Engineering. ESEM 2021: 36:1-36:6
• 
  Valentina Lenarduzzi, Oscar Dieste, Davide Fucci, Sira Vegas:
  Towards a Methodology for Participant Selection in Software Engineering Experiments: A Vision of the Future. ESEM 2021: 35:1-35:6
• 
  Daniel Link, Kamonphop Srisopha, Barry W. Boehm:
  Study of the Utility of Text Classification Based Software Architecture Recovery Method RELAX for Maintenance. ESEM 2021: 33:1-33:6
• 
  Yajing Luo, Peng Liang, Chong Wang, Mojtaba Shahin, Jing Zhan:
  Characteristics and Challenges of Low-Code Development: The Practitioners' Perspective. ESEM 2021: 12:1-12:11
• 
  Frenk C. J. van Mil, Ayushi Rastogi, Andy Zaidman:
  Promises and Perils of Inferring Personality on GitHub. ESEM 2021: 17:1-17:11
• 
  Ran Mo, Yang Zhao, Qiong Feng, Zengyang Li:
  The Existence and Co-Modifications of Code Clones within or across Microservices. ESEM 2021: 22:1-22:11
• 
  Amit Kumar Mondal, Chanchal K. Roy, Kevin A. Schneider, Banani Roy, Sristy Sumana Nath:
  Semantic Slicing of Architectural Change Commits: Towards Semantic Design Review. ESEM 2021: 32:1-32:6
• 
  Arif Nurwidyantoro, Mojtaba Shahin, Michel Chaudron, Waqar Hussain, Harsha Perera, Rifat Ara Shams, Jon Whittle:
  Towards a Human Values Dashboard for Software Development: An Exploratory Study. ESEM 2021: 23:1-23:12
• 
  Zakaria Ournani, Mohammed Chakib Belgaid, Romain Rouvoy, Pierre Rust, Joël Penhoat:
  Evaluating the Impact of Java Virtual Machines on Energy Consumption. ESEM 2021: 15:1-15:11
• 
  Zedong Peng, Upulee Kanewala, Nan Niu:
  Contextual Understanding and Improvement of Metamorphic Testing in Scientific Software Development. ESEM 2021: 28:1-28:6

skipping 9 more matches