User talk:Krishnavedala

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot 23:48, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

These have a highly-distorted aspect ratio, and are not useable in Wikipedia articles in their current form. AnonMoos (talk) 03:47, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I recreated the images with an aspect ratio of unity and uploaded them. Please check if they serve the purpose. Thanks. Krishnavedala (talk) 19:08, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but the margins should be trimmed so the images fit into a square; I'll get around to it in a little while, but right now my monitor failed and I'm using a backup monitor which is not very convenient until I buy a new one... AnonMoos (talk) 14:03, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can't fix File:7 Petal rose.svg since I can only download the red SVG (16kb file) no matter on which link I click to download... AnonMoos (talk) 16:17, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Thanks. --Krishnavedala (talk) 02:40, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I opened it in a text editor (SVG files are basically in plain text format) and changed the numbers in the "width=", "height=", "viewBox=" parameters at the top of the file. AnonMoos (talk) 14:03, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

---

Hello, Krishnavedala!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 15:00, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Image:Areneperfluoroarene.svg was uncategorized on 4 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:00, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:Resonance Cascade.svg was uncategorized on 5 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 16:28, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In your file Second_order_transfer_function.svg, the overdamped case is not right. All the curves should start out the same, as damping has no effect at zero velocity. But you need different equations for the different cases. See this book and my figure from its formulae. Mine has the crappy axis labels, though. Dicklyon (talk) 03:52, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see you modified mine, but didn't fix the error in yours yet. Dicklyon (talk) 18:00, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This file is not equivalent to the JPEG since File:Simple squircles.svg contains roundedrects, while File:Simple squircles.jpg contains intersections between a circle and a square! In any case, you would have done well to leave the word "squircle" out of the name of any SVG file, since neither one contains actual squircles! AnonMoos (talk) 02:18, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

True, thanks! --ElectroKid (☮ • ✍) 13:21, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aluminium dodecaboride.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ed (Edgar181) 19:31, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cannizzaro reaction example.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

DMacks (talk) 10:35, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for including the LaTeX code, making it easy to re-use and alter this diagram! Wish I were easily able to use it to regenerate the svg:( DMacks (talk) 10:54, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for noticing and bringing to my attention. The diagram is now fixed. I find LaTeX is pretty powerful and highly efficient on a much broader scale. I write my code here, obtain the PDF and convert it to SVG locally on my computer using this tool. Hope it helps you :) --ElectroKid (☮ • ✍) 13:45, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Antimony pentasulfide.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Leyo 23:08, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just added a reply to yours in the Talk page for File:Threo-Ds-isocitrate wpmp.png --AngelHerraez (talk) 18:01, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I noticed you prepared a diagram containing a Feynman diagram. Could you prepare one for OZI rule? RJFJR (talk) 00:15, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I can try. Can you give a reference for the diagram? Is the diagram represented here accurate: If yes, could you please state the reference. --Rubber Duck (☮ • ✍) 20:03, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, that isn't the diagram we need. I'll have to get you the reference from home. RJFJR (talk) 18:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My reference is "Introduction to Elementary Particles" by David Griffiths Page 75. RJFJR (talk) 23:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I took photos of the page of the book and uploaded it to ozi.htm. (It displays rather large on my browser.) Obviously it's copyrighted so I don't know what we have to change to be able to make a similar diagram. RJFJR (talk) 00:08, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have made an attempt on this. Please verify File:OZI rule - Feynmann diagram.svg and also at the OZI rule. --Rubber Duck (☮ • ✍) 05:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re-image copyright, the diagram is a well known physical law and hence not bounded by it. But, the textual content in your pictures is copyrighted and I suggest you have those images deleted for future. In the above posted link, I claim the copyright only for the soft-copy of the drawing but no original authorship. --Rubber Duck (☮ • ✍) 05:13, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, that's not the diagram needed to explain (or demonstrate) the OZI rule. It's the image with 3 curly lines (gluons) positioned so there is a line that can go across the diagram cutting only gluon lines. In the diagram I photographed from the book the line is dotted and marked with a drawing of a scissors. Sorry. RJFJR (talk) 05:40, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'll create another one. Hope your link is still active :). But this one, might be a copyrighted drawing since that is not a previously-known but something created by the author of the book. --Rubber Duck (☮ • ✍) 14:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I googled with "ozi rule feynman diagram" and found a few more diagrams for this:

• http://inspirehep.net/record/849043/plots which contains http://inspirehep.net/record/849043/files/ozi.png
• page 33 on http://prr.hec.gov.pk/Chapters/1058S-4.pdf
• Page 8 http://www-pnp.physics.ox.ac.uk/~mjohn/B4.pdf
• page 14 http://fb07-indico.physik.uni-giessen.de:8080/wiki/images/4/40/Master_svende_braun.pdf

The OZI rule talks about what happens when the diagram can be 'cut' just severing gluon lines so that part is well known; figuring out how to make a nicely layed out diagram of an example is a little more challenging. RJFJR (talk) 15:26, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Checkout File:OZI rule - Feynmann diagram2.svg. --Rubber Duck (☮ • ✍) 02:36, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent! The article looks much better now. Thank you. RJFJR (talk) 20:31, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I contacted Prof. Griffiths and he was kind enough to permit the use of images. --Rubber Duck (☮ • ✍) 22:52, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Apollo is written with 2 ll's not, 2 pp's. There is an error here twice. MaryroseB54 (talk) 10:36, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Thanks for pointing out. The SVG is now translatable as well. --Rubber Duck (☮ • ✍) 17:15, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Piperidine-2-carboxylic acid.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 16:57, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Simple squircles.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

109.165.95.206 06:59, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Could you update the graph of the logit function, please: To give a clear indication that this is the natural logarithm (ln) and not the logarithm to base 10 (log), it would be helful if the formula in the top area reads ${\displaystyle f(x)=\ln {\frac {x}{1-x}}}$ instead of ${\displaystyle \log {\frac {x}{1-x}}}$. See also [1] .--Gunnar (talk) 07:47, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]