Help us serve you better: Take our reader survey.

William E. Garnett

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was last updated during the official's most recent election or appointment. Please contact us with any updates.
William E. Garnett

Silhouette Placeholder Image.png

Do you have a photo that could go here? Click here to submit it for this profile!


New York Supreme Court 2nd Judicial District
Tenure
Present officeholder

Education

Bachelor's

Fordham University, 1973

Graduate

New York University School of Law, 1988

Law

Brooklyn School of Law, 1976


William E. Garnett is an acting justice of the Kings County Supreme Court, Criminal Term, in the 2nd Judicial District of New York. He was appointed to this position in 2002. He has also served on the New York City Criminal Court since 1991.[1][2]

Education

Garnett received his B.A. degree from Fordham University in 1973, his J.D. degree from the Brooklyn School of Law in 1976, and his L.L.M. degree from the New York University School of Law in 1988.[1]

Career

Garnett began his career in 1976 as an assistant district attorney in Kings County. He moved to the Richmond County District Attorney's Office in 1982, where he served until 1991. He was then appointed to the New York City Criminal Courts. In 2002, he was appointed an acting supreme court justice assigned to the New York City Criminal Court.[1]

Noteworthy cases

Public release of the Eric Garner grand jury record

Groups such as the New York American Civil Liberties Union, the Legal Aid Society and the New York Post petitioned the Kings County Supreme Court to publicly release additional information from the Eric Garner case, such as the grand jury transcripts. Eric Garner was killed in July 2014 after a police officer held him in a chokehold during an arrest for selling loose cigarettes.

Garnett was assigned the case after Justice Stephen J. Rooney recused himself due to a potential conflict of interest. Garnett presided over a brief hearing on Monday, January 5, 2015, and heard arguments from lawyers from both sides on January 29, 2015.[3][4][5]

On March 19, Garnett denied the requests to release the transcripts, saying the petitioners did not give a "compelling and particularized need" to make them public.[6]

If every newsworthy case were deemed compelling and, thus justified disclosure, the veil of grand jury secrecy would be lifted and every citizen’s right to have fellow citizens, sitting on a grand jury, check the power of the police and the prosecutor without pressure from outside influences -- real or perceived -- would be imperiled.[7]
—Judge Garnett[6]

See also

External links

Footnotes