Robert G. Kleeman

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Local Politics Image.jpg

Ballotpedia provides comprehensive coverage of the 100 largest cities in America by population as well as mayoral, city council, and district attorney election coverage in state capitals outside of the 100 largest cities. This judge is outside of that coverage scope and does not receive scheduled updates.


BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
Ballotpedia does not currently cover this office or maintain this page. Please contact us with any updates.
Robert G. Kleeman

Silhouette Placeholder Image.png

Do you have a photo that could go here? Click here to submit it for this profile!


Illinois 18th Circuit Court
Tenure
Present officeholder

Education

Bachelor's

University of Illinois, 1984

Law

University of Illinois, 1987


Robert G. "Bob" Kleeman is a circuit judge on the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Illinois.[1] He was appointed by the Illinois Supreme Court on November 27, 2012, (effective February 4, 2013) to replace Hollis L. Webster.[2] He was elected to a full term on the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit Court in 2014.[3]

Elections

2014

See also: Illinois judicial elections, 2014
Kleeman ran for election to the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit Court.
Primary: He was successful in the Republican primary on March 18, 2014, receiving 54.9 percent of the vote. He competed against Neal W. Cerne.
General: He was unopposed in the general election on November 4, 2014. [3][4][5] 

Evaluations

The Illinois State Bar Association and participating attorneys rated Robert G. Kleeman as Recommended for election in a 2014 poll.[6]

Education

Kleeman earned a B.S. from the University of Illinois in 1984. He received his J.D. from the University of Illinois, College of Law in 1987.[7]

Career

Kleeman is also an adjunct professor at Loyola University School of Law.[7]

Noteworthy cases

Illinois v. Parthasarathy Agrawal

By an order filed March 31, the Illinois Second District Appellate Court vacated Kleeman's decision in the case.

In the matter before the trial court, the defendant, Parthasarathy Agrawal, filed a petition to lift a statutory summary suspension after he was charged with driving under the influence, among other offenses. The defendant was represented by attorney Stephen Klein at a hearing on the petition, which took place before Kleeman.

According to the appellate court, the defendant in the case did not receive a fair hearing because the trial judge was under the mistaken impression that Klein was lying. The order included portions of the hearing transcript, in which Kleeman repeatedly accused Klein of lying about various issues and failing to adhere to the rules of professional conduct for attorneys in the state. According to the appellate court, the judge's attitude toward defense counsel prevented the defendant from receiving a fair hearing on his petition.

The court's order noted:

We can have no confidence in the integrity of the outcome of the hearings in this case in the presence of such hostility on the part of the trial judge.[9]
—Justice Robert McLaren writing on behalf of the appellate court[10]

The case was returned to the trial court for a new hearing, in front of a different judge.

See also

External links

Footnotes