[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

A commenter comes here to the blog and manages to hit every single gun blog cliche in a single comment. His comments in red. Let’s take a look:

Glock Fanboi

The brand wars. The two most insufferable fanbois are the Glock and the HK aficionados. We all tend to be loyal to a brand, whether that brand is Glock, Beretta, HK, or Smith and Wesson. Most of that is a matter of opinion and I happen to own or have owned most of the major handgun brands. As far as the striker fired pistols go, I prefer the 18 degree grip angle of my Smith and Wesson over the 22 degree grip angle of the Glock. Your own mileage may vary.

However, a bone to pick with the statement above is that Glock produced its first 10mm 35 years ago in 1990, the same year that Smith and Wesson produced the 1006. As noted in the article, Colt is the manufacturer that has produced the 10mm the longest.

Refighting the Caliber Wars

The initial bullets for the 10mm (which are the same bullets that the .40 fires) were poor performers because they tended to overpenetrate. This was solved in the .40 because the bullets were a couple of hundred fps slower. That had nothing to do with bullet design, but was a function of the FBI agents being limp-wristed and sensitive to recoil.

The 9mm used to have a problem with expansion, but modern bullet design has largely solved that issue through the use of multiple means, including things like bonded lead cores, polymer-filled cavities, and specialized jacket designs, allowing for better stopping power while minimizing over-penetration. Other interesting design improvements include bonded designs or the all-copper hollow points. The coolest bullet designs I have seen yet are the monolithic designs that expand by using fluid dynamics of bullet shape to cause expansion. Bullet design has come a long way in the past 40 years. The most recent are bullets made from a blend of metal (for mass) and polymer to control expansion, called impact expansion. Arguments about what caliber bullet expands better are largely pointless at this time.

All handguns, as noted in the previous post, are sacrifices. We sacrifice effectiveness for convenience in carrying. Still, the majority of handgun rounds are so close to each other in performance that there isn’t a practical difference, thanks to modern bullet design.

Now we mix reasons. If cost is a factor, 9mm is cheaper. Most handgun loads are in the same ballpark for power. For example, there are 9mm loads that come in at 500 ft/lb, which puts them in the same area as .40S&W.

I have a .45 that holds 14+1, a .40 that holds 15+1, another that holds 7+1, and a 9mm that holds 17+1, with another that holds 8+1. Capacity is function of model, size (full, compact, mini, micro), and caliber.

Brand loyalty again, this time for ammo

In 10mm, there are not many companies that load 10mm to full power. The reason is simple: 10mm is still a niche cartridge, and the market for it is too small to offer a large variety. The makers of ammo are simply making what sells, and what sells is ammo that isn’t producing lots of recoil. The smaller ammo companies are tapping into the small market that wants the power and doesn’t care about recoil. It’s simply a matter of marketing and sales.

This is largely balderdash, and we have already addressed bullet design.

Reloading

Perhaps you can, but reloading doesn’t make economic sense, especially if you are taking the value of your time into account. I have skewered this sacred cow before.

Danger

No, no, no. You shouldn’t shoot .40 ammo in a 10mm pistol. It isn’t good for your pistol to do so, just as it isn’t good to fire .380 through a 9mm. Recommending that you do so indicates to me a lack of knowledge about firearms. I know that there are a lot of people who do, but that doesn’t mean that they are right, nor does it mean that it is a good idea.

Revolvers can do this like .44 Special through a .44 Magnum, or .38Spl in a .357Mag because of the difference in how those two platforms (revolver vs. auto) set their headspace. A revolver sets headspace by indexing on the rim of the cartridge. An autoloader that fires a straight walled case sets that space by the bullet seating in the barrel.

The 10mm case is 0.992 inches long. The .40S&W is 0.850 inches long. Since the headspace is longer for a 10mm, firing a .40S&W in it causes gas pressure and leakage to prematurely wear out your barrel and also damage your rifling. Additionally, it causes damage to your extractor.

If you want to do this, buy a .40 caliber barrel for your 10mm.

I live in Florida. Open carry is not an option here. I am not a cop, so duty carry isn’t a thing. If I am going to war, I sure won’t be reliant on a handgun. For home defense, I have a bedside handgun, but it is only there to buy me time to get to the long guns in the closet. There is an AR, a shotgun, and a PDC in the closet for home defense.

Also, I have revolvers as well, so I am well aware that you can carry a revolver. As you note, I have a J frame just for that purpose.

If you compare the muzzle velocity of a 38 and a 32 out of the same length barrel, you get the same- about 850 fps, with the chief difference between the two being a 38 bullet that is about 50% heavier. If I want to carry something with a longer barrel, then I would simply go with an autoloader or a .357magum. I am not recoil sensitive enough to need a low recoil handgun.

I don’t pretend to be an expert, and most of the posts that you see on guns are largely a matter of opinion, including my own. I am not sure whether my opinions are more knowledgeable than anyone else, but I have owned literally hundreds of firearms over my lifetime, and still own more than the ATF knows about. Call it dozens. I have more ammo in the house than the local police or fire department would be comfortable with. I still own the first firearm that I ever owned- a Winchester Model 250 (it’s a .22LR lever action with a tube feed). I have owned that gun since I was 8 years old. I also have my great grandfather’s shotgun that is over 100 years old.

Even with all of that, just when I get to thinking that I own a lot, along comes someone else to show me that I don’t know or have as much as I think I do. My neighbor has more firearms than I do, and one of my coworkers knows more about loading ammo and shooting out to 1200 yards than I ever will. So I don’t pretend to be an expert, just an aging man with a long list of opinions.

Thanks for the opportunity to get another post out.

Categories: Guns

8 Comments

Gerry · March 3, 2025 at 10:37 am

You spent a lot of time and effort when this would have worked as well.

“I don’t care Margaret.”

Dick Tickles · March 3, 2025 at 10:53 am

Wow, u like jumping to conclusions. Since you got it all figured out, I won’t bother commenting on your latest gun topics and instead of reading another Boomer bitchfest about how your job and employer sucks, I’ma peace out.

    Divemedic · March 3, 2025 at 11:09 am

    Don’t be a little bitch. Oh, and I am not a boomer, dumbass. Don’t bother commenting again until you reconsider your attitude and apologize, princess.
    See up to this point, it was a difference of opinion and some misguided and mistaken thoughts on your part, such as advising people to shoot 40 through a 10mm. However, by upping the ante to personal attacks, you have earned yourself a place in the ban list for violating rules 2, 3, and 10.
    In a blog first, I am offering you the opportunity to apologize.
    Or you can continue to be a little bitch.
    Your choice.

SoCoRuss · March 3, 2025 at 1:42 pm

LOL, the gun and caliber wars restart. Man I feel you. I try and stay away from this subject anymore. Cant we gun guys just get along?
But just for fun, here we go.
Gun brands or ammo doesn’t matter today. You can kill anyone with any brand gun in any caliber using any ammo if you just put the bullet in the correct spot. That’s the key to settle the argument.
And to settle the main issue for me: M&P’s Rule, why? Because that 18 degree angle just feels perfect to me. What feels good for you might be different and that’s cool too.

Now lets get to more important things like: Blonds, Brunettes or Redheads (Real Redheads) or normal, slightly abnormal, slightly crazy or full blown go for broke crazy.

    Divemedic · March 3, 2025 at 2:07 pm

    The odd part is that I wasn’t trying to get into all of that. I own firearms in a dozen different calibers, and each of them have their own merits, meaning that no single one of them is “best.”

    The problem is that some people are so wedded to their opinion, their favorite gun, or their favorite caliber that to say you like something else is tantamount to heresy or a declaration of war. It’s like getting caught looking at a woman by a jealous girlfriend.

    The only area where I would say that he was wrong was the one about shooting 40 in a 10mm Glock is OK. He is wrong there, and even Glock says so. The rest of his points are matters of opinion.

    Still, anyone who is going to attack people over a minor difference of opinion makes me question his temperament and the wisdom of them carrying firearms.

    As far as Blonds, Brunettes or Redheads (Real Redheads): I am easy like that. All I ask is that my women not have been born with a penis and that they not be absolutely crazy.

Tom762 · March 3, 2025 at 2:54 pm

As far as any argument is concerned, .22’s and .32’s have stuck as many in the graveyard as 9’s and .45’s.

First rule of a gunfight: Have a gun.

First rule of Area Ocho: Don’t fuck with Divemedic

    Divemedic · March 3, 2025 at 3:52 pm

    Sure, the .22 has killed more people outside of warfare than any other pistol caliber. However, if the person I shoot dies in the ambulance on the way to the hospital after stabbing me and my family to death, was the caliber effective? I would argue that it wasn’t.
    The problem is that there are no studies or statistics kept to validate one caliber over the other as a defensive success. Each shooting is its own event, with its own variables, and there is no real way to judge one over the other. I would argue, and this is my opinion, that any handgun caliber of .38 or larger is an effective defensive round as long as you can get reliable torso hits with it.

    That first rule I would modify thusly: You can disagree with anyone on this site, just don’t be an asshole about it. Disagree with the idea, don’t impugn the person.
    You will note that I moderate the comments on this site so that no comment is posted that attacks any other person. Me or anyone else.

Roy in Nipomo · March 3, 2025 at 3:29 pm

TBH, I’m old and like my Colt 1911s (I’m in Calif so magazine capacity is less of a problem). OTOH, if I were carry concealed again, I’d probably go with a Glock next time around. Why? The Glock is reliable and (relatively) inexpensive. It is a tool that generally does its job. It also has no “soul” and is fungible. If stopped by the po-po and told to “drop the gun” (even if it is in the holster), I’d cry a lot less dropping a Glock than a real gun. Like a general purpose hammer or screwdriver, they are easily replaced. I wouldn’t want to carry a weapon that I would feel bad if it ended up in an evidence room for six month to a year (and/or “disappeared”).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *