Socialwg/2015-04-14
socialwg Teleconf 2015-04-14
Tuesdays at 10am US/Pacific, 1pm US/Eastern time for 60 minutes
- Check your timezone
- Dial-in +1-617-761-6200 , SIP Instructions, Zakim Code "SOCL"
Previous Meeting
Minutes
- socialwg/2015-04-14-minutes (pending meeting completion and scribe update)
- IRC log: http://socialwg.indiewebcamp.com/irc/social/2015-04-14
Agenda
- Chair: Tantek (backup: Arnaud)
- Scribe:
- Regrets:
- elf Pavlik
- (put your name here)
Preamble
Chair to start the meeting by typing on irc:
trackbot, start meeting
Trackbot should already be on the channel but if for some reason it is not call it with the following command:
/invite trackbot
Zakim won't know what meeting it is. Just ignore it. Pick a scribe from the list or ask Zakim to pick one up with the following command:
Zakim, pick a victim
Unfortunately Zakim has no idea who's scribed before so you may have to ask several times before getting an acceptable answer...
Then type:
scribe: xxx
Also, with WebEx, Zakim doesn't know who is on the call so, as people join they should record their attendance with the command: present+ <nickname>
For additional info, see the Zakim documentation page.
Admin
Participation
- Participation is limited to members
Approval of Minutes of 7 April 2015 Teleconf
Next Teleconf
Next F2F
2015-05-04 Paris
- we need goals and agenda — Pavlik elf (talk) 08:12, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Tracking of Actions and Issues
- Tracker: http://www.w3.org/Social/track/
Activity Streams 2.0
- Test Harness Demonstration (James Snell and JP Perrault, IBM)
- Open Pull Requests
- https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/pull/96 - Remove PossibleAnswer from Vocab
- https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/pull/95 - Remove Inverse Properties from Vocab
- https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/pull/92 - Add profile parameter to media type
- Open Issues from the Editor:
- https://www.w3.org/Social/track/issues/26 and https://www.w3.org/Social/track/issues/27: Do we want to add a "Profile" object to the Core Vocabulary or Not? Are the "Person" or "Actor" objects enough? (we need a proposal)
- https://www.w3.org/Social/track/issues/28 : Do we want to model "Friend Request" and "Connection" as Activities or Objects? E.g. is it "Joe requested a connection to Sally" or "Joe created a Connection with Sally". In most Social Platforms, the Connection/Relationship is modeled as an *Object*. Currently we model these as Activities, which doesn't seem to make sense (note: modeling as an Activity is a carryover from AS1)
- https://www.w3.org/Social/track/issues/31 : Two part issue: (a) Refactor and simplify audience targeting by removing "to" and "bto", (b) rename the existing "target" and "origin" properties to "to" and "from"
- https://www.w3.org/Social/track/issues/32 : Deprecate "generator" and "provider" ? Is there harm in keeping these around? (IBM uses them as informational metadata only)
Social API
Coordination with IG
Additional Agenda Items
DO NOT REMOVE THIS Additional Agenda Items SECTION, add more agenda items here (or in a NEW === section === previous to this section)
- ...
back to socialwg