[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

Improving Resource and Energy Efficiency of Packaging Machines: Contribution of an Increasing Format Flexibility

Article Preview

Abstract:

Manufacturers and users of packaging machines are facing two significant challenges: the improvement of the sustainability and the enhancement of the format flexibility. The sustainability of products is becoming a more important influencing factor for the consumer buying behavior. Therefore, the increase of the energy and resource efficiency of packaging machines is a very promising strategy to achieve this goal. At first glance no correlation between format flexibility and sustainability seems to exist. But in fact, both topics partly depend on each other. These connections are the focus of this paper. Exemplary for sustainability, the resource and energy efficiency in the context of packaging machines will be considered. As a further detailing, this paper also contains an experimental investigation of a more format flexible and sustainable processing technology for sealing. Therefore, the heat-impulse technology was investigated.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

257-264

Citation:

Online since:

November 2015

Export:

Price:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] G. Bleisch, J. -P. Majschak, U. Weiß, Verpackungstechnische Prozesse Lebensmittel–, Pharma- und Chemieindustrie – Theorie und Praxis, Behr's Verlag, Hamburg, (2011).

Google Scholar

[2] N. Mahalik, A. Nambiar, Trends in food packaging and manufacturing systems and technology. Trends in Food Science & Technology 21 (2010), p.117–128.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2009.12.006

Google Scholar

[3] K. Verghese, H. Lewis, L. Fitzpatrick, Packaging for Sustainability, Springer, London, (2012).

Google Scholar

[4] A. Sethi, S. Sethi, Flexibility in Manufacturing: A Survey, The International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems 2 (1990), p.289–328.

Google Scholar

[5] H. –P. Wiendahl, H.A. ElMaraghy, P. Nyhuis, M.F. Zäh, H. –H. Wiendahl, N. Duffie, M. Brieke1, Changeable Manufacturing – Classification, Design and Operation, Annals of the CIRP Vol. 56/2 (2007), p.783–809.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2007.10.003

Google Scholar

[6] E. Abele, T. Liebeck, A. Wörn, Measuring Flexibility in Investment Decisions for Manufacturing Systems, Annals of the CIRP Vol. 55/1 (2006), p.433–436.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)60452-1

Google Scholar

[7] G. Bleisch, H. Goldhahn, G. Schricker, H. Vogt (Eds. ), Lexikon Verpackungstechnik, Behr's Verlag, Hamburg, (2003).

Google Scholar

[8] Roland Berger, Mastering product complexity 2012, 2012, http: /www. rolandberger. us/media/pdf/Roland_Berger_Mastering-Product-Complexity_20121107. pdf.

Google Scholar

[9] R. McIntosh, G. Owen, S. Culley, T. Mileham, Changeover Improvement: Reinterpreting Shingo's SMED, Methodology. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management Vol. 54, No. 1 (2007), p.98–111.

DOI: 10.1109/tem.2006.889070

Google Scholar

[10] F. Apostolos, S. Panagiotis, S. Konstantinos, C. George, Energy Efficiency Assessment of Laser Drilling Process, Laser Assisted Net shape Engineering 7 (LANE 2012) 39 (2012), p.776–783.

DOI: 10.1016/j.phpro.2012.10.100

Google Scholar

[11] W. Li, S. Kara, An empirical model for predicting energy consumption of manufacturing processes: a case of turning process, Journal of Engineering Manufacture Vol. 225, No. 9 (2011), p.1636–1646.

DOI: 10.1177/2041297511398541

Google Scholar

[12] F. Klocke, R. Schlosser, S. Tönissen, Prozesseffizienz durch Parameterwahl. wt Werkstattstechnik online 5 (2010), p.346–349.

DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2010-5-346

Google Scholar

[13] ISO 14955, Part 1, Machine tools - Environmental evaluation of machine tools, Beuth, Berlin, (2012).

Google Scholar

[14] DIN 8743, Packaging machines and packaging lines – Key figures to characterise operation behaviour and requirements for data collection in an acceptance test, Beuth, Berlin, (2014).

Google Scholar

[15] R. McIntosh, R. Cully, A. Mileham, G. Owen, Improving Changeover Performance – A strategy for becoming a lean, responsive manufacturer, Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, (2001).

Google Scholar

[16] K. Salonitis, P. Ball, Energy Efficient Manufacturing from Machine Tools to Manufacturing Systems, Forty Sixth CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems 7 (2013), p.634–639.

DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2013.06.045

Google Scholar

[17] H. Potente, Fügen von Kunststoffen – Grundlagen, Verfahren, Anwendung, Hanser, München, (2004).

Google Scholar

[18] A. Rößle, Impulsschweißen: Kürzere Zyklen, reduzierte Downtime und flexiblere Geometrien, Tagung Verarbeitungsmaschinen und Verpackungstechnik 2009, Dresden, 2009, p.181–196.

Google Scholar

[19] D.H. Stamatis, TQM Engineering Handbook, Marcel Dekker, New York, (1997).

Google Scholar