[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Impacts of renewable energy resources on the weather vulnerability of power systems

Abstract

The high penetration of weather-dependent renewable energy sources (WD-RESs) such as wind and solar has raised concerns about the security of electric power systems during abnormal weather conditions. The role of RESs has been discussed in worldwide blackout events, yet remains controversial. In this study, we find that although WD-RESs are non-dispatchable and weather sensitive, blackout intensities and extreme weather vulnerability are mitigated in high-penetration WD-RES grids. The causal effects of WD-RESs on blackouts generally decrease in high-penetration WD-RES power systems, and WD-RESs are not mainly responsible for the occurrence of blackouts in extreme weather conditions. The results of our research contribute to the debate on RES integration and power system security, offer a guide for the study of power system resilience and provide a reference for the ambitious high-penetration RES goals of the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Probabilities and regression functions of different blackout intensities at different WD-RES penetration levels.
Fig. 2: Probabilities that a power grid with higher-penetration WD-RES has mitigated intensity.
Fig. 3: Rarity probability of weather-induced and non-weather-induced events.
Fig. 4: Rarity probabilities of weather-induced events with different WD-RES penetration levels.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The raw data of blackout events are available from DOE form OE-417 (ref. 46). Weather conditions come from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) National Solar Radiation Database (NSRDB)34. Weather-dependent renewable energy penetration levels come from the US EIA 923 state-level generation and fuel consumption data30). The processed combined datasets described in Supplementary Note 1 are available in .mat form via Figshare at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25628700 (ref. 47). Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

Blackout data were pre-processed using Matlab 2019b. The statistical analysis and deep clustering were performed with Matlab 2019b correlation command and the Curve Fitting Tool, and Python 3.7, Keras 2.4.3 and Scikit-learn 0.24.2. All the tools mentioned above are open source and can be accessed by the public. Codes for statistical analysis, causal inference and deep clustering are available from the author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Nalley, S. & LaRose, A. Annual Energy Outlook 2022 (US EIS, 2022); https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/AEO2022_ReleasePresentation.pdf

  2. DeVilbiss, J. & Brown, M. T. Wind was Second-largest Source of U.S. Electricity Generation on March 29 (US EIA, 2022); https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=52038

  3. The Development of Renewable Energy in the Electricity Market. (European Commission, 2023); https://economy-finance.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2023-06/dp187_en_energy%20markets.pdf

  4. Policy Information, Renewable Electricity (Ireland Government Department of the Environment, Climate and Communications, 2024); https://www.gov.ie/en/policy-information/7498e-renewable-electricity/

  5. 2030 Strategic Framework for International Climate and Nature Action (UK Government Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, 2023); https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/642a9b717de82b000c313473/2030-strategic-framework-for-international-climate-and-nature-action.pdf

  6. Denmark’s Climate Status and Outlook 2022 (Danish Energy Agency, 2021); https://ens.dk/sites/ens.dk/files/Material/cso21_-_english_transllation_of_kf21_hovedrapport.pdf

  7. Towards Net-zero Emissions in the EU Energy System by 2050 (Joint Research Centre, 2020); https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/94aab140-8378-11ea-bf12-01aa75ed71a1/languag e-en

  8. CAISO Day-Ahead Market Enhancements Final Report 2023 (California ISO, 2023); http://www.caiso.com/InitiativeDocuments/RevisedFinalProposal-Day-AheadMarketEnhancements.pdf

  9. 2021 Long-term Reliability Assessment. North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC, 2021); https://www.nerc.com/pa/RAPA/ra/Reliability%20Assessments%20DL/NERC_LTRA_2021.pdf

  10. Review of the System Black Event in South Australia on 28 September 2016 (Australian Energy Market Commission, 2019); https://www.aemc.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/aemc_-_sa_black_system_review_-_final_report.pdf

  11. Technical Report on the Events of 9 August 2019 (National Grid ESO, 2019); https://www.nationalgrideso.com/document/152346/download

  12. Busby, J. W. et al. Cascading risks: understanding the 2021 winter blackout in Texas. Energy Res. Social Sci. 77, 102–106 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gruber, K. et al. Profitability and investment risk of Texan power system winterization. Nat. Energy 7, 409–416 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Blunt, K. America’s Power Grid Is Increasingly Unreliable. Wall Street Journal (18 February 2022); https://www.wsj.com/articles/americas-power-grid-is-increasingly-unreliable-11645196772

  15. Perera, A. T. D. et al. Quantifying the impacts of climate change and extreme climate events on energy systems. Nat. Energy 5, 150–159 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Höltinger, S. et al. The impact of climatic extreme events on the feasibility of fully renewable power systems: a case study for Sweden. Energy 178, 695–713 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Novacheck, J. et al. The Evolving Role of Extreme Weather Events in the U.S. Power System with High Levels of Variable Renewable Energy (NREL, 2021); https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy22osti/78394.pdf

  18. Zhao, J., Li, F., Chen, X. & Wu, Q. Deep learning based model-free robust load restoration to enhance bulk system resilience with wind power penetration. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 37, 1969–1978 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hines, P., Apt, J. & Talukdar, S. Trends in the history of large blackouts in the United States. In 2008 IEEE PES General Meeting 1–8 (IEEE, 2008).

  20. Carreras, B. A., Newman, D. E. & Dobson, I. North American blackout time series statistics and implications for blackout risk. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 31, 4406–4414 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ji, C. et al. Large-scale data analysis of power grid resilience across multiple US service regions. Nat. Energy 1, 16052 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kenward, A. & Urooj, R. Blackout: extreme weather climate change and power outages (Climate Central, 2014).

  23. Allen, M. et al. Impacts of climate change on sub-regional electricity demand and distribution in the southern United States. Nat. Energy 1, 16103 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Webster, M. et al. Integrated hydrological, power system and economic modelling of climate impacts on electricity demand and cost. Nat. Energy 7, 163–169 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Stürmer, J. et al. Increasing the resilience of the Texas power grid against extreme storms by hardening critical lines. Nat. Energy 9, 526–535 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Souto, L. et al. Identification of weather patterns and transitions likely to cause power outages in the United Kingdom. Commun. Earth Environ. 5, 49 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Xu, L. et al. Resilience of renewable power systems under climate risks. Nat. Rev. Electr. Eng. 1, 53–66 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Reese, A. Blackouts cast Australia’s green energy in dim light. Science 355, 1001–1002 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Electric Disturbance Events (OE-417) Annual Summaries (DOE, 2019); https://www.oe.netl.doe.gov/OE417_annual_summary.aspx

  30. State-level Generation and Fuel Consumption Data (US EIA); https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/eia923/

  31. Sales (Consumption), Revenue, Prices & Customers. Number of Customers (annual). By Sector by state and/or utility. By state, by provider (US EIA, 2024); https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data.php

  32. Sales (Consumption), Revenue, Prices & Customers. Retail Sales of Electricity to Ultimate Customers (Annual). By Sector, by state, by provider (US EIA, 2024); https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data.php

  33. Pearl, J., Glymour, M. and Jewell, N. P. Causal Inference in Statistics: A Primer (John Wiley & Sons, 2016).

  34. NSRDB: National Solar Radiation Database (NREL, 2024); https://maps.nrel.gov/nsrdb-viewer/

  35. Guo, X., Liu, X., Zhu, E. & Yin, J. Deep clustering with convolutional autoencoders. In International Conf. on Neural Information Processing 373–382 (Springer, 2017).

  36. Schäfer, B., Witthaut, D., Timme, M. & Latora, V. Dynamically induced cascading failures in power grids. Nat. Commun. 9, 1975 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Menck, P. J., Heitzig, J., Kurths, J. & Schellnhuber, H. J. How dead ends undermine power grid stability. Nat. Commun. 5, 3969 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Simpson-Porco, J. W., Dorfler, F. & Bullo, F. Voltage collapse in complex power grids. Nat. Commun. 7, 10790 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Stumpf, M. P. H. & Porter, M. A. Critical truths about power laws. Science 335, 665–666 (2012).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. Clauset, A., Shalizi, C. R. & Newman, M. E. J. Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Rev. 51.4, 661–703 (2009).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. ENTSO-E Transparency Platform (ENTSO-E, 2024); https://transparency.entsoe.eu

  42. Australian Outage Data (Ausgrid, 2023); https://www.ausgrid.com.au/Industry/Our-Research/Data-to-share/Past-outage-data

  43. Australian Renewable Operation Data (AEMO, 2024); https://aemo.com.au/energy-systems/electricity/wholesale-electricity-market-wem/data-wem/data-dashboard#records

  44. Canadian Outage Data (Generac, 2024); https://www.generac.com/prepare/canada-outages/

  45. Canadian Renewable Operation Data (Government of Canada, 2018); https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/2cdf43fc-d4aa-4604-9f21-29777d955810/resource/2971c342-94e7-416b-8e61-02c64c532708

  46. Form OE-417 Electricity Emergency Incident and Disturbance Report (DOE, 2024); https://www.oe.netl.doe.gov/docs/OE417_Form_Instructions_05312024.pdf

  47. Zhao, J., Li, F. & Zhang, Q. Renewable energy + weather + power system blackout (large-scale outage). Figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25628700 (2024).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the funding support in part from the US National Science Foundation (NSF) grant ECCS-1809458 and in part from the CURENT research centre which is a US NSF and Department of Energy Engineering Research Center funded under NSF grant EEC-1041877. In addition, J.Z. would like to thank the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation and the host professor C. Rehtanz during September 2022–June 2023, as their unconditional support ensures the continuation of this research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.Z. and F.L. conceived the idea. J.Z. designed the study and wrote the initial draft. J.Z. and F.L. revised the article. J.Z. collected and analysed the data. Q.Z. validated the data. F.L. supervised the overall study.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fangxing Li.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Energy thanks Russell McKenna, Wei Sun and Dirk Witthaut for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Notes 1–8, Figs. 1–12 and Tables 1–14.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 2

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 3

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 4

Statistical source data.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, J., Li, F. & Zhang, Q. Impacts of renewable energy resources on the weather vulnerability of power systems. Nat Energy 9, 1407–1414 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-024-01652-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-024-01652-1

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing