Abstract
The high penetration of weather-dependent renewable energy sources (WD-RESs) such as wind and solar has raised concerns about the security of electric power systems during abnormal weather conditions. The role of RESs has been discussed in worldwide blackout events, yet remains controversial. In this study, we find that although WD-RESs are non-dispatchable and weather sensitive, blackout intensities and extreme weather vulnerability are mitigated in high-penetration WD-RES grids. The causal effects of WD-RESs on blackouts generally decrease in high-penetration WD-RES power systems, and WD-RESs are not mainly responsible for the occurrence of blackouts in extreme weather conditions. The results of our research contribute to the debate on RES integration and power system security, offer a guide for the study of power system resilience and provide a reference for the ambitious high-penetration RES goals of the future.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
£14.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
£99.00 per year
only £8.25 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The raw data of blackout events are available from DOE form OE-417 (ref. 46). Weather conditions come from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) National Solar Radiation Database (NSRDB)34. Weather-dependent renewable energy penetration levels come from the US EIA 923 state-level generation and fuel consumption data30). The processed combined datasets described in Supplementary Note 1 are available in .mat form via Figshare at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25628700 (ref. 47). Source data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
Blackout data were pre-processed using Matlab 2019b. The statistical analysis and deep clustering were performed with Matlab 2019b correlation command and the Curve Fitting Tool, and Python 3.7, Keras 2.4.3 and Scikit-learn 0.24.2. All the tools mentioned above are open source and can be accessed by the public. Codes for statistical analysis, causal inference and deep clustering are available from the author upon reasonable request.
References
Nalley, S. & LaRose, A. Annual Energy Outlook 2022 (US EIS, 2022); https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/AEO2022_ReleasePresentation.pdf
DeVilbiss, J. & Brown, M. T. Wind was Second-largest Source of U.S. Electricity Generation on March 29 (US EIA, 2022); https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=52038
The Development of Renewable Energy in the Electricity Market. (European Commission, 2023); https://economy-finance.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2023-06/dp187_en_energy%20markets.pdf
Policy Information, Renewable Electricity (Ireland Government Department of the Environment, Climate and Communications, 2024); https://www.gov.ie/en/policy-information/7498e-renewable-electricity/
2030 Strategic Framework for International Climate and Nature Action (UK Government Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, 2023); https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/642a9b717de82b000c313473/2030-strategic-framework-for-international-climate-and-nature-action.pdf
Denmark’s Climate Status and Outlook 2022 (Danish Energy Agency, 2021); https://ens.dk/sites/ens.dk/files/Material/cso21_-_english_transllation_of_kf21_hovedrapport.pdf
Towards Net-zero Emissions in the EU Energy System by 2050 (Joint Research Centre, 2020); https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/94aab140-8378-11ea-bf12-01aa75ed71a1/languag e-en
CAISO Day-Ahead Market Enhancements Final Report 2023 (California ISO, 2023); http://www.caiso.com/InitiativeDocuments/RevisedFinalProposal-Day-AheadMarketEnhancements.pdf
2021 Long-term Reliability Assessment. North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC, 2021); https://www.nerc.com/pa/RAPA/ra/Reliability%20Assessments%20DL/NERC_LTRA_2021.pdf
Review of the System Black Event in South Australia on 28 September 2016 (Australian Energy Market Commission, 2019); https://www.aemc.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/aemc_-_sa_black_system_review_-_final_report.pdf
Technical Report on the Events of 9 August 2019 (National Grid ESO, 2019); https://www.nationalgrideso.com/document/152346/download
Busby, J. W. et al. Cascading risks: understanding the 2021 winter blackout in Texas. Energy Res. Social Sci. 77, 102–106 (2021).
Gruber, K. et al. Profitability and investment risk of Texan power system winterization. Nat. Energy 7, 409–416 (2022).
Blunt, K. America’s Power Grid Is Increasingly Unreliable. Wall Street Journal (18 February 2022); https://www.wsj.com/articles/americas-power-grid-is-increasingly-unreliable-11645196772
Perera, A. T. D. et al. Quantifying the impacts of climate change and extreme climate events on energy systems. Nat. Energy 5, 150–159 (2020).
Höltinger, S. et al. The impact of climatic extreme events on the feasibility of fully renewable power systems: a case study for Sweden. Energy 178, 695–713 (2019).
Novacheck, J. et al. The Evolving Role of Extreme Weather Events in the U.S. Power System with High Levels of Variable Renewable Energy (NREL, 2021); https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy22osti/78394.pdf
Zhao, J., Li, F., Chen, X. & Wu, Q. Deep learning based model-free robust load restoration to enhance bulk system resilience with wind power penetration. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 37, 1969–1978 (2022).
Hines, P., Apt, J. & Talukdar, S. Trends in the history of large blackouts in the United States. In 2008 IEEE PES General Meeting 1–8 (IEEE, 2008).
Carreras, B. A., Newman, D. E. & Dobson, I. North American blackout time series statistics and implications for blackout risk. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 31, 4406–4414 (2016).
Ji, C. et al. Large-scale data analysis of power grid resilience across multiple US service regions. Nat. Energy 1, 16052 (2016).
Kenward, A. & Urooj, R. Blackout: extreme weather climate change and power outages (Climate Central, 2014).
Allen, M. et al. Impacts of climate change on sub-regional electricity demand and distribution in the southern United States. Nat. Energy 1, 16103 (2016).
Webster, M. et al. Integrated hydrological, power system and economic modelling of climate impacts on electricity demand and cost. Nat. Energy 7, 163–169 (2022).
Stürmer, J. et al. Increasing the resilience of the Texas power grid against extreme storms by hardening critical lines. Nat. Energy 9, 526–535 (2024).
Souto, L. et al. Identification of weather patterns and transitions likely to cause power outages in the United Kingdom. Commun. Earth Environ. 5, 49 (2024).
Xu, L. et al. Resilience of renewable power systems under climate risks. Nat. Rev. Electr. Eng. 1, 53–66 (2024).
Reese, A. Blackouts cast Australia’s green energy in dim light. Science 355, 1001–1002 (2017).
Electric Disturbance Events (OE-417) Annual Summaries (DOE, 2019); https://www.oe.netl.doe.gov/OE417_annual_summary.aspx
State-level Generation and Fuel Consumption Data (US EIA); https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/eia923/
Sales (Consumption), Revenue, Prices & Customers. Number of Customers (annual). By Sector by state and/or utility. By state, by provider (US EIA, 2024); https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data.php
Sales (Consumption), Revenue, Prices & Customers. Retail Sales of Electricity to Ultimate Customers (Annual). By Sector, by state, by provider (US EIA, 2024); https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data.php
Pearl, J., Glymour, M. and Jewell, N. P. Causal Inference in Statistics: A Primer (John Wiley & Sons, 2016).
NSRDB: National Solar Radiation Database (NREL, 2024); https://maps.nrel.gov/nsrdb-viewer/
Guo, X., Liu, X., Zhu, E. & Yin, J. Deep clustering with convolutional autoencoders. In International Conf. on Neural Information Processing 373–382 (Springer, 2017).
Schäfer, B., Witthaut, D., Timme, M. & Latora, V. Dynamically induced cascading failures in power grids. Nat. Commun. 9, 1975 (2018).
Menck, P. J., Heitzig, J., Kurths, J. & Schellnhuber, H. J. How dead ends undermine power grid stability. Nat. Commun. 5, 3969 (2014).
Simpson-Porco, J. W., Dorfler, F. & Bullo, F. Voltage collapse in complex power grids. Nat. Commun. 7, 10790 (2016).
Stumpf, M. P. H. & Porter, M. A. Critical truths about power laws. Science 335, 665–666 (2012).
Clauset, A., Shalizi, C. R. & Newman, M. E. J. Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Rev. 51.4, 661–703 (2009).
ENTSO-E Transparency Platform (ENTSO-E, 2024); https://transparency.entsoe.eu
Australian Outage Data (Ausgrid, 2023); https://www.ausgrid.com.au/Industry/Our-Research/Data-to-share/Past-outage-data
Australian Renewable Operation Data (AEMO, 2024); https://aemo.com.au/energy-systems/electricity/wholesale-electricity-market-wem/data-wem/data-dashboard#records
Canadian Outage Data (Generac, 2024); https://www.generac.com/prepare/canada-outages/
Canadian Renewable Operation Data (Government of Canada, 2018); https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/2cdf43fc-d4aa-4604-9f21-29777d955810/resource/2971c342-94e7-416b-8e61-02c64c532708
Form OE-417 Electricity Emergency Incident and Disturbance Report (DOE, 2024); https://www.oe.netl.doe.gov/docs/OE417_Form_Instructions_05312024.pdf
Zhao, J., Li, F. & Zhang, Q. Renewable energy + weather + power system blackout (large-scale outage). Figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25628700 (2024).
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the funding support in part from the US National Science Foundation (NSF) grant ECCS-1809458 and in part from the CURENT research centre which is a US NSF and Department of Energy Engineering Research Center funded under NSF grant EEC-1041877. In addition, J.Z. would like to thank the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation and the host professor C. Rehtanz during September 2022–June 2023, as their unconditional support ensures the continuation of this research work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.Z. and F.L. conceived the idea. J.Z. designed the study and wrote the initial draft. J.Z. and F.L. revised the article. J.Z. collected and analysed the data. Q.Z. validated the data. F.L. supervised the overall study.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Energy thanks Russell McKenna, Wei Sun and Dirk Witthaut for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Notes 1–8, Figs. 1–12 and Tables 1–14.
Source data
Source Data Fig. 1
Statistical source data.
Source Data Fig. 2
Statistical source data.
Source Data Fig. 3
Statistical source data.
Source Data Fig. 4
Statistical source data.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, J., Li, F. & Zhang, Q. Impacts of renewable energy resources on the weather vulnerability of power systems. Nat Energy 9, 1407–1414 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-024-01652-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-024-01652-1