[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 

Topic Editors

Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Instituto Literario 100, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca CP 50000, Mexico
Departamento de Anatomía, Producción Animal y Ciencias Clínicas Veterinarias, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Campus Terra, Lugo, Spain
Facultad de Zootecnia y Ecología, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Periférico R. Aldama Km 1, Chihuahua 31031, Mexico

Precision Feeding and Management of Farm Animals, 2nd Edition

Abstract submission deadline
closed (30 June 2024)
Manuscript submission deadline
closed (31 August 2024)
Viewed by
15243

Topic Information

Dear Colleagues,

The increase in demand for animal products, due to recent demographic and dietary changes, as well as societal concerns related to the environment (climate change), reduction of greenhouse gases (GHGe), human health (non-use of antibiotics and synthetic growth promoters) and animal welfare (increase in organic production systems) has led to the development of precision livestock farming (PLF) technologies, which provide farmers with a real-time monitoring and management systems that could monitor real-time performance parameters, animal health and welfare, grazing patterns and animal feeding in a continuous and automated way, which offers the opportunity to improve productivity, evaluate production parameters and thus develop genetic selection strategies and/or detect health problems at an early stage.

The aim of this Topic is to address the above issues by exploring the potential of PLF and to discuss the possible benefits and risks arising from the use of such technologies.

Prof. Dr. Manuel Gonzalez-Ronquillo
Prof. Dr. Marta I. Miranda Castañón
Prof. Dr. Einar Vargas-Bello-Pérez
Topic Editors

Keywords

  • precision livestock farming
  • animal welfare
  • bolus
  • satellite image
  • sensor
  • sound based
  • radio frequency identification
  • modelling
  • sustainable agriculture

Participating Journals

Journal Name Impact Factor CiteScore Launched Year First Decision (median) APC
Agriculture
agriculture
3.3 4.9 2011 19.2 Days CHF 2600
Animals
animals
2.7 4.9 2011 16.1 Days CHF 2400
Poultry
poultry
- - 2022 28.8 Days CHF 1000
Ruminants
ruminants
- - 2021 25.2 Days CHF 1000

Preprints.org is a multidiscipline platform providing preprint service that is dedicated to sharing your research from the start and empowering your research journey.

MDPI Topics is cooperating with Preprints.org and has built a direct connection between MDPI journals and Preprints.org. Authors are encouraged to enjoy the benefits by posting a preprint at Preprints.org prior to publication:

  1. Immediately share your ideas ahead of publication and establish your research priority;
  2. Protect your idea from being stolen with this time-stamped preprint article;
  3. Enhance the exposure and impact of your research;
  4. Receive feedback from your peers in advance;
  5. Have it indexed in Web of Science (Preprint Citation Index), Google Scholar, Crossref, SHARE, PrePubMed, Scilit and Europe PMC.

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Journals
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
24 pages, 9717 KiB  
Article
Automated Measurement of Cattle Dimensions Using Improved Keypoint Detection Combined with Unilateral Depth Imaging
by Cheng Peng, Shanshan Cao, Shujing Li, Tao Bai, Zengyuan Zhao and Wei Sun
Animals 2024, 14(17), 2453; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14172453 - 23 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1062
Abstract
Traditional measurement methods often rely on manual operations, which are not only inefficient but also cause stress to cattle, affecting animal welfare. Currently, non-contact cattle dimension measurement usually involves the use of multi-view images combined with point cloud or 3D reconstruction technologies, which [...] Read more.
Traditional measurement methods often rely on manual operations, which are not only inefficient but also cause stress to cattle, affecting animal welfare. Currently, non-contact cattle dimension measurement usually involves the use of multi-view images combined with point cloud or 3D reconstruction technologies, which are costly and less flexible in actual farming environments. To address this, this study proposes an automated cattle dimension measurement method based on an improved keypoint detection model combined with unilateral depth imaging. Firstly, YOLOv8-Pose is selected as the keypoint detection model and SimSPPF replaces the original SPPF to optimize spatial pyramid pooling, reducing computational complexity. The CARAFE architecture, which enhances upsampling content-aware capabilities, is introduced at the neck. The improved YOLOv8-pose achieves a mAP of 94.4%, a 2% increase over the baseline model. Then, cattle keypoints are captured on RGB images and mapped to depth images, where keypoints are optimized using conditional filtering on the depth image. Finally, cattle dimension parameters are calculated using the cattle keypoints combined with Euclidean distance, the Moving Least Squares (MLS) method, Radial Basis Functions (RBFs), and Cubic B-Spline Interpolation (CB-SI). The average relative errors for the body height, lumbar height, body length, and chest girth of the 23 measured beef cattle were 1.28%, 3.02%, 6.47%, and 4.43%, respectively. The results show that the method proposed in this study has high accuracy and can provide a new approach to non-contact beef cattle dimension measurement. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Data collection and body measurement scenes. (<b>a</b>) Image acquisition environment. (<b>b</b>) Image acquisition equipment. (<b>c</b>) Measurement equipment. (<b>d</b>) Body scale measurement environment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Dataset example graph.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Data Annotation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Technology Roadmap.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Overall architecture of CARAFE.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>SimSPFF network structure diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Improved YOLOv8-pose network structure diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Schematic diagram of pixel coordinates to world coordinates conversion.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Schematic diagram of body height and body length calculation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Schematic diagram of lumbar height calculation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Chest circumference calculation curve.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Keypoint prediction results. (<b>a</b>) In excellent lighting conditions; (<b>b</b>) with the cow standing; (<b>c</b>) with the cow bowing its head; (<b>d</b>) with the cow walking.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Normality test results: (<b>a</b>) indicates the results of body height; (<b>b</b>) indicates the results of lumbar height; (<b>c</b>) indicates the results of body length; (<b>d</b>) indicates the results of chest girth.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Body size measurement box plot results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Results of keypoint detection and body size measurement under different noise conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Keypoint detection and body measurement results at different distances.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Keypoint detection and body measurement results for different postures.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Non-contact body measurement system.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 269 KiB  
Article
Short-Term Effects of Heat Stress on Cow Behavior, Registered by Innovative Technologies and Blood Gas Parameters
by Ramūnas Antanaitis, Karina Džermeikaitė, Justina Krištolaitytė, Renalda Juodžentytė, Rolandas Stankevičius, Giedrius Palubinskas and Arūnas Rutkauskas
Animals 2024, 14(16), 2390; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14162390 - 18 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1583
Abstract
Heat stress (HS) is one of the key factors affecting an animal’s immune system and productivity, as a result of a physiological reaction combined with environmental factors. This study examined the short-term effects of heat stress on cow behavior, as recorded by innovative [...] Read more.
Heat stress (HS) is one of the key factors affecting an animal’s immune system and productivity, as a result of a physiological reaction combined with environmental factors. This study examined the short-term effects of heat stress on cow behavior, as recorded by innovative technologies, and its impact on blood gas parameters, using 56 of the 1070 cows clinically evaluated during the second and subsequent lactations within the first 30 days postpartum. Throughout the experiment (from 4 June 2024 until 1 July 2024), cow behavior parameters (rumination time min/d. (RT), body temperature (°C), reticulorumen pH, water consumption (L/day), cow activity (h/day)) were monitored using specialized SmaXtec boluses and employing a blood gas analyzer (Siemens Healthineers, 1200 Courtneypark Dr E Mississauga, L5T 1P2, Canada). During the study period, the temperature–humidity index (THI), based on ambient temperature and humidity, was recorded and used to calculate THI and to categorize the data into four THI classes as follows: 1—THI 60–63 (4 June 2024–12 June 2024); 2—THI 65–69 (13 June 2024–18 June 2024); 3—THI 73–75 (19 June 2024–25 June 2024); and 4—THI 73–78 (26 June 2024–1 July 2024). The results showed that heat stress significantly reduced rumination time by up to 70% in cows within the highest THI class (73 to 78) and increased body temperature by 2%. It also caused a 12.6% decrease in partial carbon dioxide pressure (pCO2) and a 32% increase in partial oxygen pressure (pO2), also decreasing plasma sodium by 1.36% and potassium by 6%, while increasing chloride by 3%. The findings underscore the critical need for continuous monitoring, early detection, and proactive management to mitigate the adverse impacts of heat stress on dairy cow health and productivity. Recommendations include the use of advanced monitoring technologies and specific blood gas parameter tracking to detect the early signs of heat stress and implement more timely interventions. Full article
15 pages, 1124 KiB  
Article
Proteomic Identification and Quantification of Basal Endogenous Proteins in the Ileal Digesta of Growing Pigs
by Iris Elisa Ávila-Arres, Elba Rodríguez Hernández, Sergio Gómez Rosales, Tércia Cesária Reis de Souza and Gerardo Mariscal-Landín
Animals 2024, 14(13), 2000; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14132000 - 7 Jul 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1466
Abstract
The accurate estimation of basal endogenous losses (BEL) of amino acids at the ileum is indispensable to improve nutrient utilization efficiency. This study used a quantitative proteomic approach to identify variations in BEL in the ileal digesta of growing pigs fed a nitrogen-free [...] Read more.
The accurate estimation of basal endogenous losses (BEL) of amino acids at the ileum is indispensable to improve nutrient utilization efficiency. This study used a quantitative proteomic approach to identify variations in BEL in the ileal digesta of growing pigs fed a nitrogen-free diet (NFD) or a casein diet (CAS). Eight barrow pigs (39.8 ± 6.3 kg initial body weight (BW)) were randomly assigned to a 2 × 2 crossover design. A total of 348 proteins were identified and quantified in both treatments, of which 101 showed a significant differential abundance between the treatments (p < 0.05). Functional and pathway enrichment analyses revealed that the endogenous proteins were associated with intestinal metabolic function. Furthermore, differentially abundant proteins (DAPs) in the digesta of pigs fed the NFD enriched terms and pathways that suggest intestinal inflammation, the activation of innate antimicrobial host defense, an increase in cellular autophagy and epithelial turnover, and reduced synthesis of pancreatic and intestinal secretions. These findings suggest that casein diets may provide a more accurate estimation of BEL because they promote normal gastrointestinal secretions. Overall, proteomic and bioinformatic analyses provided valuable insights into the composition of endogenous proteins in the ileal digesta and their relationship with the functions, processes, and pathways modified by diet composition. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Gene Ontology and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of ileal endogenous proteins. (<b>A</b>) Biological process; (<b>B</b>) cellular compartment; (<b>C</b>) molecular function; (<b>D</b>) KEGG pathways. The y-axis shows significantly enriched GO terms and pathways, whereas the x-axis denotes fold enrichment. The size of dots represents the number of genes within this term or pathway, and dots’ colors represent the enrichment FDR.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Volcano plot of differentially abundant proteins. Volcano plot representing each protein with a dot. The “x” axis represents the log<sub>2</sub> FC between CAS and NFD and the “y” axis represents the <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value (−log<sub>10</sub>). The dashed lines indicate the significance limit in the <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value and FC. Gray dots represent proteins with non-significant changes in abundance. Colored dots represent proteins that significantly increase (<b>right</b>) or decrease (<b>left</b>) their abundance in the digesta of pigs fed CAS diets.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Heatmap of differentially abundant proteins (DAPs). Heatmap representing the hierarchical clustering of DAPs. Rows correspond to proteins and columns to samples. Colors represent the abundance values of proteins between NFD and CAS treatments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of differentially abundant proteins. (<b>A</b>) GO enrichment analysis. The y-axis shows significantly enriched GO terms; BP: biological process, MF: molecular function, CC: cellular component (for each treatment (CAS and NFD)). The x-axis represents the fold enrichment, and the size of the dots represents the number of genes within each term. The colors of the dots represent the FDR enrichment. (<b>B</b>) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis. The x-axis displays the fold enrichment and the pathways enriched in CAS and NFD.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 10060 KiB  
Article
Fusion of Target and Keypoint Detection for Automated Measurement of Mongolian Horse Body Measurements
by Lide Su, Minghuang Li, Yong Zhang, Zheying Zong and Caili Gong
Agriculture 2024, 14(7), 1069; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14071069 - 3 Jul 2024
Viewed by 885
Abstract
Accurate and efficient access to Mongolian horse body size information is an important component in the modernization of the equine industry. Aiming at the shortcomings of manual measurement methods, such as low efficiency and high risk, this study converts the traditional horse body [...] Read more.
Accurate and efficient access to Mongolian horse body size information is an important component in the modernization of the equine industry. Aiming at the shortcomings of manual measurement methods, such as low efficiency and high risk, this study converts the traditional horse body measure measurement problem into a measurement keypoint localization problem and proposes a top-down automatic Mongolian horse body measure measurement method by integrating the target detection algorithm and keypoint detection algorithm. Firstly, the SimAM parameter-free attention mechanism is added to the YOLOv8n backbone network to constitute the SimAM–YOLOv8n algorithm, which provides the base image for the subsequent accurate keypoint detection; secondly, the coordinate regression-based RTMPose keypoint detection algorithm is used for model training to realize the keypoint localization of the Mongolian horse. Lastly, the cosine annealing method was employed to dynamically adjust the learning rate throughout the entire training process, and subsequently conduct body measurements based on the information of each keypoint. The experimental results show that the average accuracy of the SimAM–YOLOv8n algorithm proposed in this study was 90.1%, and the average accuracy of the RTMPose algorithm was 91.4%. Compared with the manual measurements, the shoulder height, chest depth, body height, body length, croup height, angle of shoulder and angle of croup had mean relative errors (MRE) of 3.86%, 4.72%, 3.98%, 2.74%, 2.89%, 4.59% and 5.28%, respectively. The method proposed in this study can provide technical support to realize accurate and efficient Mongolian horse measurements. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Illustration of measured body dimensions of Mongolian horse. 1—Shoulder height (SH); 2—Chest depth (CD); 3—Withers height (WH); 4—Body length (BL); 5—Croup height (CH); 6—Angle of shoulder (AS); 7—Angle of croup (AC).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The layout of experiment environment test set filming diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Results of dataset visualization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Schematic diagram of SimAM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>SimAM–YOLOv8n network structure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>RTMPose network structure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Training process for different keypoint detection algorithms.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Technological roadmap.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparison of manual measurement and our method for the seven different body parameters.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 1184 KiB  
Article
Changes in Parameters Registered by Innovative Technologies in Cows with Subclinical Acidosis
by Ramūnas Antanaitis, Karina Džermeikaitė, Justina Krištolaitytė, Rolandas Stankevičius, Gintaras Daunoras, Mindaugas Televičius, Dovilė Malašauskienė, John Cook and Lorenzo Viora
Animals 2024, 14(13), 1883; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14131883 - 26 Jun 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1288
Abstract
The hypothesis of this study was that there were changes in biomarkers registered by innovative technologies in cows with subclinical acidosis. The aim of this study was to identify changes in the in-line milk fat-to-protein ratio and cow feeding behaviors such as reticulorumen [...] Read more.
The hypothesis of this study was that there were changes in biomarkers registered by innovative technologies in cows with subclinical acidosis. The aim of this study was to identify changes in the in-line milk fat-to-protein ratio and cow feeding behaviors such as reticulorumen pH, reticulorumen temperature, cow activity, and water intake with subclinical acidosis. From a total of 98 cows, 59 cows were selected to meet the following criteria (2 or more lactations, with 31 days in milk (DIM)). The selected animals were separated into two groups based on general clinical examination and reticulorumen pH: the subclinical acidosis group (SCA, n = 23) and the healthy group (HC, n = 36). During the diagnosis of subclinical acidosis and following the clinical examination of the healthy group using the BROLIS HerdLine system, the daily averages of milk yield (kg/day), milk fat (%), milk protein (%), and the milk fat-to-protein ratio were recorded. Simultaneously, by using Smaxtec technology, reticulorumen parameters and cow activity, including pH, temperature (°C), rumination time (minutes/day), and water intake (hours/day), were registered. Changes in parameters measured using innovative technologies were able to identify cows with subclinical acidosis. Cows with subclinical acidosis had a lower reticulorumen pH by 18.8% (p < 0.0001), a decreased milk yield by 10.49% (p < 0.001), a lower milk fat-to-protein ratio by 11.88% (p < 0.01), and a decreased rumination time by 6.59% (p < 0.01). However, the activity of these cows was higher by 57.19% (p < 0.001) compared to healthy cows. From a practical point of view, we suggest that veterinarians and farmers track parameters such as reticulorumen pH, milk yield, milk fat-to-protein ratio, rumination time, and activity for the identification of subclinical acidosis. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Association between reticulorumen pH and milk fat-to-protein ratio. F/P—milk fat-to-protein ratio.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Association between milk yield and milk fat-to-protein ratio. MY—milk yield; F/P—milk fat-to-protein ratio.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Association between cows activity and milk fat-to-protein ratio. Activity—activity of cows; F/P—milk fat-to-protein ratio.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Association between water intake and milk fat-to-protein ratio. F/P—milk fat-to-protein ratio.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 511 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Precision Ingredient Inclusion on Production Efficiency Responses in Finishing Beef Cattle
by Santana R. Hanson, Erin. R. DeHaan, Forest L. Francis, Warren C. Rusche and Zachary K. Smith
Ruminants 2024, 4(1), 112-124; https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants4010007 - 22 Feb 2024
Viewed by 1016
Abstract
Two randomized complete block design experiments evaluated the influence that varying degrees of ingredient inclusion accuracy in a finishing diet have on growth performance and carcass traits. Treatments included (1) normal inclusion tolerance with a 0.454 kg tolerance for all ingredients (CON) or [...] Read more.
Two randomized complete block design experiments evaluated the influence that varying degrees of ingredient inclusion accuracy in a finishing diet have on growth performance and carcass traits. Treatments included (1) normal inclusion tolerance with a 0.454 kg tolerance for all ingredients (CON) or (2) variable inclusion tolerance where each ingredient was randomly increased or decreased but the targeted as-fed quantity for the daily delivery was met (VAR). In Experiment. 1, black Angus heifers (n = 60; initial shrunk BW = 460 ± 26.2 kg) were used in a 112 d experiment. Ten pens in total (5 pens/treatment, 6 heifers/pen) were used. The targeted diet (DM basis) consisted of high-moisture ear corn (75%), dried distiller’s grains (20%), and a liquid supplement (5%). As-fed inclusion rates for DDGS and LS varied from formulated targets by −20, −15, −10, −5, 0, +5, +10, +15 or +20%. The HMEC inclusion was adjusted so that the targeted as-fed amount of the diet was delivered daily. Treatment did not alter ADG, DMI, G:F, HCW, dressing percentage, rib-eye area, rib fat, USDA marbling score, KPH, yield grade, retail yield, empty body fat, or body weight at 28% estimated EBF, nor liver abscess prevalence or severity (p ≥ 0.15). In Exp. 2, Charolais–Angus cross steers (n = 128; initial shrunk BW = 505 ± 32.1 kg) were used in a 94 d experiment. Steers were assigned to pens (8 pens/treatment; 8 steers/pen) and one of the two management strategies used in Exp. 1 was employed. Ractopamine HCl was fed (300 mg per head daily) during the final 28 d. Diets consisted of (DM basis) dry-rolled corn (63%), dried distiller’s grains plus solubles (15%), liquid supplement (5%), grass hay (7%), and corn silage (10%). Ingredient inclusions were randomized in the same manner as Exp. 1, except LS inclusion was held constant. Corn silage inclusion was adjusted so that the targeted as-fed amount of the diet was delivered each day. Steers from VAR had increased (p = 0.01) DMI, but similar (p = 0.75) ADG resulting in reduced (p ≤ 0.02) G:F and growth-performance-predicted Net Energy for maintenance and gain. Treatment did not influence (p ≥ 0.38) HCW, dressing percentage, rib-eye area, rib fat, KPH, yield grade, retail yield, empty body fat, or body weight at 28% estimated EBF. A tendency for an increased USDA marbling score (p = 0.08) was noted in VAR. Under the conditions of this experiment, randomly altering ingredient proportions can impact growth performance and efficiency measures depending upon the type of finishing diet fed. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Regression of daily intake variation (ED) determined according to [<a href="#B9-ruminants-04-00007" class="html-bibr">9</a>] regressed against gain-to-feed ratio (G:F). Treatments included (1) normal inclusion tolerance with a 0.454 kg tolerance for all ingredients (Constant) or (2) variable inclusion tolerance where each ingredient was randomly increased or decreased but the targeted as-fed quantity for the daily delivery was met (variable). Slopes and intercepts differed (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.01). For constant, G:F = −0.0060 (±0.00210)ED + 0.7767 (±0.22269), R<sup>2</sup> = 0.86, <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.01; for variable, G:F = 0.0027 (±0.00210)ED − 0.1467 (±0.22269), R<sup>2</sup> = 0.28, <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.17.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 3871 KiB  
Review
Computer Vision-Based Measurement Techniques for Livestock Body Dimension and Weight: A Review
by Weihong Ma, Xiangyu Qi, Yi Sun, Ronghua Gao, Luyu Ding, Rong Wang, Cheng Peng, Jun Zhang, Jianwei Wu, Zhankang Xu, Mingyu Li, Hongyan Zhao, Shudong Huang and Qifeng Li
Agriculture 2024, 14(2), 306; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14020306 - 14 Feb 2024
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3961
Abstract
Acquiring phenotypic data from livestock constitutes a crucial yet cumbersome phase in the breeding process. Traditionally, obtaining livestock phenotypic data primarily involves manual, on-body measurement methods. This approach not only requires extensive labor but also induces stress on animals, which leads to potential [...] Read more.
Acquiring phenotypic data from livestock constitutes a crucial yet cumbersome phase in the breeding process. Traditionally, obtaining livestock phenotypic data primarily involves manual, on-body measurement methods. This approach not only requires extensive labor but also induces stress on animals, which leads to potential economic losses. Presently, the integration of next-generation Artificial Intelligence (AI), visual processing, intelligent sensing, multimodal fusion processing, and robotic technology is increasingly prevalent in livestock farming. The advantages of these technologies lie in their rapidity and efficiency, coupled with their capability to acquire livestock data in a non-contact manner. Based on this, we provide a comprehensive summary and analysis of the primary advanced technologies employed in the non-contact acquisition of livestock phenotypic data. This review focuses on visual and AI-related techniques, including 3D reconstruction technology, body dimension acquisition techniques, and live animal weight estimation. We introduce the development of livestock 3D reconstruction technology and compare the methods of obtaining 3D point cloud data of livestock through RGB cameras, laser scanning, and 3D cameras. Subsequently, we explore body size calculation methods and compare the advantages and disadvantages of RGB image calculation methods and 3D point cloud body size calculation methods. Furthermore, we also compare and analyze weight estimation methods of linear regression and neural networks. Finally, we discuss the challenges and future trends of non-contact livestock phenotypic data acquisition. Through emerging technologies like next-generation AI and computer vision, the acquisition, analysis, and management of livestock phenotypic data are poised for rapid advancement. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Computer vision-based phenotypic data acquisition technical framework.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Three different 3D reconstruction methods based on RGB images, laser scanning, and 3D cameras. (<b>a</b>) displays a 3D reconstruction technique utilizing RGB images [<a href="#B29-agriculture-14-00306" class="html-bibr">29</a>]; (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>) shows two different 3D reconstruction methods based on laser scanning [<a href="#B30-agriculture-14-00306" class="html-bibr">30</a>,<a href="#B31-agriculture-14-00306" class="html-bibr">31</a>]; (<b>d</b>) is reconstructed using a 3D camera [<a href="#B32-agriculture-14-00306" class="html-bibr">32</a>]. These techniques provide innovative computer vision methods for precise, non-contact measurement of livestock body dimensions and weight.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Acquisition method and the result of 3D reconstruction in [<a href="#B31-agriculture-14-00306" class="html-bibr">31</a>,<a href="#B42-agriculture-14-00306" class="html-bibr">42</a>], (<b>a</b>) is the result of 3D reconstruction in [<a href="#B31-agriculture-14-00306" class="html-bibr">31</a>], (<b>b</b>) is the result of 3D reconstruction in [<a href="#B42-agriculture-14-00306" class="html-bibr">42</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Depth camera-based 3D reconstruction methods. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) The scenes where the point clouds are acquired in [<a href="#B46-agriculture-14-00306" class="html-bibr">46</a>,<a href="#B49-agriculture-14-00306" class="html-bibr">49</a>], respectively. (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) The 3D reconstruction methods in [<a href="#B46-agriculture-14-00306" class="html-bibr">46</a>,<a href="#B49-agriculture-14-00306" class="html-bibr">49</a>], respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Livestock body dimension acquisition technology.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The geometric segmentation methods based on RGB images. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) The scenarios of acquiring point cloud data in [<a href="#B55-agriculture-14-00306" class="html-bibr">55</a>,<a href="#B65-agriculture-14-00306" class="html-bibr">65</a>], respectively. (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) The key point detection in [<a href="#B55-agriculture-14-00306" class="html-bibr">55</a>,<a href="#B65-agriculture-14-00306" class="html-bibr">65</a>], respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Neural network-based key area segmentation [<a href="#B56-agriculture-14-00306" class="html-bibr">56</a>]. Subfigure (<b>a</b>) shows the determined ear–root point pairs and tail–root point pairs. Subfigure (<b>b</b>) depicts a schematic of the backline in a planar projection. Subfigure (<b>c</b>) presents the results after segmenting the pig’s body.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Brief framework of neural network-based point cloud weight estimation method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Neural network weight estimation process [<a href="#B77-agriculture-14-00306" class="html-bibr">77</a>].</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 2551 KiB  
Article
Farmers’ Perceptions on Implementing Automatic Milking Systems in Large USA Dairies: Decision-Making Process, Management Practices, Labor, and Herd Performance
by Camila Flavia de Assis Lage, Thaisa Campos Marques, Daniela R. Bruno, Marcia I. Endres, Fernanda Ferreira, Ana Paula Alves Pires, Karen Leão and Fabio Soares de Lima
Animals 2024, 14(2), 218; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14020218 - 9 Jan 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2841
Abstract
Automatic Milking System (AMS) installations are increasing in the USA despite the higher investment cost than conventional systems. Surveys on AMSs conducted outside the USA focused on small–medium herds, specific regions, or aspects of AMS milking. This study described farmers’ perceptions about the [...] Read more.
Automatic Milking System (AMS) installations are increasing in the USA despite the higher investment cost than conventional systems. Surveys on AMSs conducted outside the USA focused on small–medium herds, specific regions, or aspects of AMS milking. This study described farmers’ perceptions about the decision-making process of adopting an AMS in the USA’s large dairies (≥7 AMS boxes) regarding changes in technology, housing, management practices, labor, herd performance, and health. After being contacted, 27 of 55 farmers from large AMS herds completed the survey. The main reasons for adopting an AMS were labor costs, cows’ welfare, and herd performance. Most farms constructed new barns, used a free-flow traffic system, and changed their feed management. Increases in water and energy use were perceived by 42% and 62% of farmers, respectively. Farmers estimated decreases in labor costs of over 21%, and AMS employees worked 40–60 h/week. Milk production increases were reported by 58%, with 32% observing higher milk fat and protein content. Easier sick cow detection, better mastitis management, and improvements in pregnancy rates were reported. Thus, farmers transitioning to AMSs perceived altered resource utilization, labor cost savings, and improvements in employee quality of life, animal welfare, and farm management. While 54% of respondents would recommend an AMS to other farms, 38% suggested considering additional aspects prior to adoption. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study design and objectives of the Automatic Milking System (AMS) survey.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Do you think transitioning to automatic milking systems reduced the labor on your dairy? (27 respondents chose ≥ 1 reason).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Milk performance after transitioning to Automatic Milking System. SCC = somatic cell count.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>How important do you think the data generated by the AMS systems are for your herd health management?</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Culling rates (<b>a</b>) and main reasons for culling cows before and after transitioning to AMS (<b>b</b>). SCC = somatic cell count.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Farmers’ perceptions about transitioning to Automatic Milking Systems on a Likert Scale (27 respondents chose ≥ 1 reason).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Would you recommend that other farmers switch to Automatic Milking Systems? (27 respondents chose ≥ 1 reason). The reasons for those who chose “It depends” are pointed out in the rectangle.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop