[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 

Topic Editors

Departamento de Enxeñería Eléctrica, Universidade de Vigo, EEI, Campus de Lagoas-Marcosende, 36310 Vigo, Spain
Center for Energy, Digital Resilient Cities, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, Giefinggasse 4, 1210 Vienna, Austria
Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería, University of Huelva, 21819 Huelva, Spain

Smart Electric Energy in Buildings

Abstract submission deadline
15 May 2025
Manuscript submission deadline
15 July 2025
Viewed by
22997

Topic Information

Dear Colleagues,

The development of technologies based on sensors, data, communications, and computation can help to increase energy efficiency and to have more sustainable buildings. In particular, in the case of electric energy, there is a long way to go in terms of integrating renewable energy, energy storage, energy sharing, or reducing consumption. In this Topic, we invite submissions of research papers that deal with at least one of the following aspects, considering houses, buildings, condominiums, or any other group of living places:

-The application of enabling technologies to the electric energy in a house or in a building, i.e., Big Data, Artificial Intelligence, Digital Twin, Internet of Things, etc…;

-Technologies, scenarios, and methodologies in storing electric energy;

-Development of renewable and alternative sources of energy;

-Changes in distribution, routines, equipment that can help to have healthier, and more comfortable living places;

-Different approaches to energy management, depending on the scenario;

-Optimization of energy storage, consumption, charge of Electric Vehicles, etc…;

-Upgrades of electric service, in terms of continuity, flexibility, availability, etc…;

-Integration of buildings with Smart Cities;

-Analysis of trends and challenges to solve in the electrical and/or renewable energy installation.

Prof. Dr. Daniel Villanueva Torres
Dr. Ali Hainoun
Prof. Dr. Sergio Gómez Melgar
Topic Editors

Keywords

  • energy efficiency
  • sustainable building
  • electric energy
  • renewable energy
  • enabling technologies
  • big data
  • artificial intelligence
  • digital twin
  • Internet of Things
  • energy management
  • energy storage
  • electric vehicles
  • smart cities

Participating Journals

Journal Name Impact Factor CiteScore Launched Year First Decision (median) APC
Applied Sciences
applsci
2.5 5.3 2011 17.8 Days CHF 2400 Submit
Energies
energies
3.0 6.2 2008 17.5 Days CHF 2600 Submit
Buildings
buildings
3.1 3.4 2011 17.2 Days CHF 2600 Submit
Smart Cities
smartcities
7.0 11.2 2018 25.8 Days CHF 2000 Submit
AI
ai
3.1 7.2 2020 17.6 Days CHF 1600 Submit

Preprints.org is a multidiscipline platform providing preprint service that is dedicated to sharing your research from the start and empowering your research journey.

MDPI Topics is cooperating with Preprints.org and has built a direct connection between MDPI journals and Preprints.org. Authors are encouraged to enjoy the benefits by posting a preprint at Preprints.org prior to publication:

  1. Immediately share your ideas ahead of publication and establish your research priority;
  2. Protect your idea from being stolen with this time-stamped preprint article;
  3. Enhance the exposure and impact of your research;
  4. Receive feedback from your peers in advance;
  5. Have it indexed in Web of Science (Preprint Citation Index), Google Scholar, Crossref, SHARE, PrePubMed, Scilit and Europe PMC.

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Journals
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
48 pages, 11010 KiB  
Article
Performance Evaluation of Small Wind Turbines Under Variable Winds of Cities: Case Study Applied to an Ayanz Wind Turbine with Screw Blades
by Gonzalo Abad, Ander Plaza and Gorka Kerejeta
Smart Cities 2024, 7(6), 3241-3288; https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities7060126 - 30 Oct 2024
Viewed by 883
Abstract
Small wind turbines placed at city locations are affected by variable-speed winds that frequently change direction. Architectural constructions, buildings of different heights and abrupt orography of Cities make the winds that occur at City locations more variable than in flat lands or at [...] Read more.
Small wind turbines placed at city locations are affected by variable-speed winds that frequently change direction. Architectural constructions, buildings of different heights and abrupt orography of Cities make the winds that occur at City locations more variable than in flat lands or at sea. However, the performance of Small-wind turbines under this type of variable wind has not been deeply studied in the specialised literature. Therefore, this article analyses the behaviour of small wind turbines under variable and gusty winds of cities, also considering three types of power electronics conversion configurations: the generally used Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) configuration, the simple only-rectifier configuration and an intermediate configuration in terms of complexity called pseudo-MPPT. This general-purpose analysis is applied to a specific type of wind turbine, i.e., the Ayanz wind turbine with screw blades, which presents adequate characteristics for city locations such as; safety, reduced visual and acoustic impacts and bird casualties avoidance. Thus, a wide simulation and experimental tests-based analysis are carried out, identifying the main factors affecting the maximisation of energy production of small wind turbines in general and the Ayanz turbine in particular. It is concluded that the mechanical inertia of the wind turbine, often not even considered in the energy production analysis, is a key factor that can produce decrements of up to 25% in energy production. Then, it was also found that electric factors related to the power electronics conversion system can strongly influence energy production. Thus, it is found that an adequate design of a simple pseudo-MPPT power conversion system could extract even 5% more energy than more complex MPPT configurations, especially in quickly varying winds of cities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Smart Electric Energy in Buildings)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The Ayanz Wind Turbine with Screw Blades. (<b>a</b>) Graphical scheme showing its main parts, (<b>b</b>) Prototype developed at Mondragon University, based on the commercially available Liam F1 AMW-750D-150W wind turbine and a cylindrical enclosure made of aluminium [<a href="#B20-smartcities-07-00126" class="html-bibr">20</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Most common power conversion configurations for small wind turbines [<a href="#B26-smartcities-07-00126" class="html-bibr">26</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Power generated with the same wind turbine using the three power conversion configurations studied in this paper. The left situation shows a ‘low voltage’ battery chosen (‘low’ speed) for pseudo-MPPT and Only Rectifier. The right situation shows a ‘high voltage’ battery chosen (‘high’ speed) for pseudo-MPPT and Only Rectifier. Curves in blue, represent power at different wind speeds.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Indirect Speed Control based MPPT [<a href="#B32-smartcities-07-00126" class="html-bibr">32</a>,<a href="#B33-smartcities-07-00126" class="html-bibr">33</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Synchronous generator’s single phase equivalent circuit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>AC-DC conversion stage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Indirect speed control of the wind turbine by imposing an electromagnetic torque <span class="html-italic">T<sub>em</sub></span>, which follows the maximum power points curve [<a href="#B32-smartcities-07-00126" class="html-bibr">32</a>,<a href="#B33-smartcities-07-00126" class="html-bibr">33</a>]. <span class="html-italic">T<sub>t</sub></span> follows a trajectory that goes through points A, B and C.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Controlling the power, the electromagnetic torque <span class="html-italic">T<sub>em</sub></span> is controlled.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>MPPT with power reference generation without using a speed sensor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Generation power curve obtained with only-rectifiier configuration, achieving nearly constant rotational speed, and a nearly perpendicular curve. Note that in this graphical example, by choosing an appropriate DC voltage battery, a rotational speed was chosen that nearly obtained 1 p.u. power at 1 p.u. speed. This adequation is not always possible since it depends on the system elements available, such as the generator’s characteristics, turbine, batteries, etc.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>(<b>a</b>) Simplified single-phase equivalent electric circuit with inductive impedance in pseudo-MPPT concept. (<b>b</b>) Space vector diagram of the fundamental components of the voltage and currents and how the pseudo-MPPT power curve is moved with different <span class="html-italic">L</span> values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>(<b>a</b>) Simplified single-phase equivalent electric circuit with capacitive impedance in pseudo-MPPT concept. (<b>b</b>) Space vector diagram of the fundamental components of the voltage and currents and how the pseudo-MPPT power curve is moved with different C values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>(<b>a</b>) WMS-21 Wind Station of Omega manufacturer (sample time = 1 s) located at the terrace of Mondragon University in the urban area of the City, (<b>b</b>) Google Maps photo showing where the anemometer has been placed for the study (place where the wind turbine can be located) at the 11th building of Mondragon University at Mondragon City.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Wind speed measured with WMS-21 Wind Station (sample time = 1 s) at a low wind day (4th of October) in Mondragon University at the urban area of the City, (<b>a</b>) wind speed measurement during 12 h and averaged every 10 min, (<b>b</b>) wind speed measurement between 9:00 and 10:00 h, (<b>c</b>) wind speed measurement between 10:00 and 11:00 h, (<b>d</b>) wind speed measurement between 11:00 and 12:00 h, (<b>e</b>) wind speed measurement between 12:00 and 13:00 h, (<b>f</b>) wind speed measurement of 20 min showing the highest wind gust.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14 Cont.
<p>Wind speed measured with WMS-21 Wind Station (sample time = 1 s) at a low wind day (4th of October) in Mondragon University at the urban area of the City, (<b>a</b>) wind speed measurement during 12 h and averaged every 10 min, (<b>b</b>) wind speed measurement between 9:00 and 10:00 h, (<b>c</b>) wind speed measurement between 10:00 and 11:00 h, (<b>d</b>) wind speed measurement between 11:00 and 12:00 h, (<b>e</b>) wind speed measurement between 12:00 and 13:00 h, (<b>f</b>) wind speed measurement of 20 min showing the highest wind gust.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Wind speed measured with WMS-21 Wind Station (sample time = 1 s) at a moderate wind day (15th of October) in Mondragon University in the urban area of the City, (<b>a</b>) wind speed measurement during 12 h and averaged every 10 min, (<b>b</b>) wind speed measurement between 9:00 and 10:00 h, (<b>c</b>) wind speed measurement between 10:00 and 11:00 h, (<b>d</b>) wind speed measurement between 11:00 and 12:00 h, (<b>e</b>) wind speed measurement between 12:00 and 13:00 h, (<b>f</b>) wind speed measurement of 20 min showing the highest wind gust.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15 Cont.
<p>Wind speed measured with WMS-21 Wind Station (sample time = 1 s) at a moderate wind day (15th of October) in Mondragon University in the urban area of the City, (<b>a</b>) wind speed measurement during 12 h and averaged every 10 min, (<b>b</b>) wind speed measurement between 9:00 and 10:00 h, (<b>c</b>) wind speed measurement between 10:00 and 11:00 h, (<b>d</b>) wind speed measurement between 11:00 and 12:00 h, (<b>e</b>) wind speed measurement between 12:00 and 13:00 h, (<b>f</b>) wind speed measurement of 20 min showing the highest wind gust.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Wind speed measured with WMS-21 Wind Station (sample time = 1 s) at a very strong wind day (‘Kirk’ Storm on 9th of October) in Mondragon University at the urban area of the City, (<b>a</b>) wind speed measurement during 12 h and averaged every 10 min, (<b>b</b>) wind speed measurement between 12:00 and 13:00 h, (<b>c</b>) wind speed measurement between 13:00 and 14:00 h, (<b>d</b>) wind speed measurement between 14:00 and 15:00 h, (<b>e</b>) wind speed measurement between 15:00 and 16:00 h, (<b>f</b>) wind speed measurement of 20 min showing the highest wind gust.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16 Cont.
<p>Wind speed measured with WMS-21 Wind Station (sample time = 1 s) at a very strong wind day (‘Kirk’ Storm on 9th of October) in Mondragon University at the urban area of the City, (<b>a</b>) wind speed measurement during 12 h and averaged every 10 min, (<b>b</b>) wind speed measurement between 12:00 and 13:00 h, (<b>c</b>) wind speed measurement between 13:00 and 14:00 h, (<b>d</b>) wind speed measurement between 14:00 and 15:00 h, (<b>e</b>) wind speed measurement between 15:00 and 16:00 h, (<b>f</b>) wind speed measurement of 20 min showing the highest wind gust.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>(<b>a</b>) The probability density function of wind measurements (averaged every 10 min and quantified every 0.5 m/s) between the 26th of September and the 10th of October. The approximated Weibull distribution function <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>f</mi> <mo>(</mo> <mi>v</mi> <mo>)</mo> <mo>=</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mfenced separators="|"> <mrow> <mstyle scriptlevel="0" displaystyle="true"> <mfrac> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">k</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">c</mi> </mrow> </mfrac> </mstyle> </mrow> </mfenced> <msup> <mrow> <mfenced separators="|"> <mrow> <mstyle scriptlevel="0" displaystyle="true"> <mfrac> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">v</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">c</mi> </mrow> </mfrac> </mstyle> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">k</mi> <mo>−</mo> <mn mathvariant="bold">1</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">e</mi> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mi> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mi> <mo>[</mo> <mo>−</mo> <mfenced separators="|"> <mrow> <mstyle scriptlevel="0" displaystyle="true"> <mfrac> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">v</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">c</mi> </mrow> </mfrac> </mstyle> </mrow> </mfenced> <mo>]</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">k</mi> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math> can be defined by k = 1.15, c = 1.1, and the average speed is 1.2 m/s. (<b>b</b>) Probability density function of the same wind measurements, after correction by the factor: <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">v</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">m</mi> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">e</mi> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">a</mi> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">s</mi> </mrow> </msub> <msup> <mrow> <mfenced separators="|"> <mrow> <mstyle scriptlevel="0" displaystyle="true"> <mfrac> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>z</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>e</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>m</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>z</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </mfrac> </mstyle> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> </mrow> </msup> <mo>=</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mfenced separators="|"> <mrow> <mstyle scriptlevel="0" displaystyle="true"> <mfrac> <mrow> <mn>6</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </mfrac> </mstyle> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>0.3</mn> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 1.4, which is an estimation of the wind measurement corrected to a 4 m higher location in an urban site [<a href="#B27-smartcities-07-00126" class="html-bibr">27</a>]. The resulting parameters are k = 1.28 and c = 1.34, and the average speed is 1.68 m/s.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>(<b>a</b>) Cp(λ) curve of the Ayanz Wind Turbine based on Screw Blades used for the first set of simulations analyses. (<b>b</b>) Block diagram of the Matlab-Simulink R2023b model to perform an idealised MPPT operation of wind turbine with different inertias.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Performance of the Ayanz Wind Turbine based on Screw Blades with idealised Indirect MPPT control and inertia of J = 0.03 kgm<sup>2</sup>. (<b>a</b>) Wind speed pattern, (<b>b</b>) Tt and Tem performances, (<b>c</b>) achieved rotational speed by the idealised MPPT control, (<b>d</b>) Optimal power with a fictitious turbine with zero inertia (Popt) and actual power generated, (<b>e</b>) Behaviour of Cp during the test, (<b>f</b>) energy generated at the 420 s test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Performance of the Ayanz Wind Turbine based on Screw Blades with idealised Indirect MPPT control and inertia of J = 0.15 kgm<sup>2</sup>. (<b>a</b>) Wind speed pattern, (<b>b</b>) Tt and Tem performances, (<b>c</b>) achieved rotational speed by the idealised MPPT control, (<b>d</b>) Optimal power with a fictitious turbine with zero inertia (Popt) and actual power generated, (<b>e</b>) Behavior of Cp during the test, (<b>f</b>) energy generated at the 420 s test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Performance of the Ayanz Wind Turbine based on Screw Blades with idealised Indirect MPPT control and inertia of J = 0.75 kgm<sup>2</sup>. (<b>a</b>) Wind speed pattern, (<b>b</b>) Tt and Tem performances, (<b>c</b>) achieved rotational speed by the idealised MPPT control, (<b>d</b>) Optimal power with a fictitious turbine with zero inertia (Popt) and actual power generated, (<b>e</b>) Behaviour of Cp during the test, (<b>f</b>) energy generated at the 420 s test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Indirect Speed Control MPPT that includes a low pass filter to ensure the stability of the system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 23
<p>Performance of the Ayanz Wind Turbine based on Screw Blades with Indirect MPPT control and τ = 1 s at low pass filter for smoothing <span class="html-italic">V<sub>dc</sub></span><sub>1</sub> oscillations (J = 0.15 kgm<sup>2</sup>, V<sub>battery</sub> = 48 V). (<b>a</b>) Wind speed pattern, (<b>b</b>) Tt and Tem performances, (<b>c</b>) achieved rotational speed by the idealised MPPT control, (<b>d</b>) Optimal power with a fictitious turbine with zero inertia (Popt) and actual power generated, (<b>e</b>) Behavior of Cp during the test, (<b>f</b>) energy generated at the 125 s test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 24
<p>Performance of the Ayanz Wind Turbine based on Screw Blades with Indirect MPPT control and τ = 6 s at low pass filter for smoothing <span class="html-italic">V<sub>dc</sub></span><sub>1</sub> oscillations (J = 0.15 kgm<sup>2</sup>, V<sub>battery</sub> = 48 V). (<b>a</b>) Wind speed pattern, (<b>b</b>) Tt and Tem performances, (<b>c</b>) achieved rotational speed by the idealised MPPT control, (<b>d</b>) Optimal power with a fictitious turbine with zero inertia (Popt) and actual power generated, (<b>e</b>) Behavior of Cp during the test, (<b>f</b>) energy generated at the 125 s test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 25
<p>Indirect Speed Control MPPT includes a low pass filter to ensure the stability of the system and also uncertainties at the MPPT curve and current and voltage sensors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 26
<p>Performance of the Ayanz Wind Turbine based on Screw Blades with Indirect MPPT control and uncertainty at the MPPT curve of 20% (optimum constant k with an error of 20%) and error at the current and voltage sensors of 5% (τ = 1 s at low pass filter, J = 0.15 kgm<sup>2</sup>, V<sub>battery</sub> = 48 V). (<b>a</b>) Wind speed pattern, (<b>b</b>) Tt and Tem performances, (<b>c</b>) achieved rotational speed by the idealised MPPT control, (<b>d</b>) Optimal power with a fictitious turbine with zero inertia (Popt) and actual power generated, (<b>e</b>) Behavior of Cp during the test, (<b>f</b>) energy generated at the 125 s test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 27
<p>Performance of the Ayanz Wind Turbine based on Screw Blades with Only-rectifier power conversion system (J = 0.15 kgm<sup>2</sup>, V<sub>battery</sub> = 36 V). (<b>a</b>) Wind speed pattern, (<b>b</b>) Tt and Tem performances, (<b>c</b>) achieved rotational speed by the idealised MPPT control, (<b>d</b>) Optimal power with a fictitious turbine with zero inertia (Popt) and actual power generated, (<b>e</b>) Behaviour of Cp during the test, (<b>f</b>) energy generated at the 125 s test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 28
<p>Performance of the Ayanz Wind Turbine based on Screw Blades with pseudo-MPPT power conversion system and external L = 30 mH (J = 0.15 kgm<sup>2</sup>, V<sub>battery</sub> = 36 V). (<b>a</b>) Wind speed pattern, (<b>b</b>) Tt and Tem performances, (<b>c</b>) achieved rotational speed by the idealised MPPT control, (<b>d</b>) Optimal power with a fictitious turbine with zero inertia (Popt) and actual power generated, (<b>e</b>) Behavior of Cp during the test, (<b>f</b>) energy generated at the 125 s test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 29
<p>Performance of the Ayanz Wind Turbine based on Screw Blades with Only-rectifier power conversion system and generator’s inductance of Ls divided by 3 (J = 0.15 kgm<sup>2</sup>, V<sub>battery</sub> = 36 V). (<b>a</b>) Wind speed pattern, (<b>b</b>) Tt and Tem performances, (<b>c</b>) achieved rotational speed by the idealised MPPT control, (<b>d</b>) Optimal power with a fictitious turbine with zero inertia (Popt) and actual power generated, (<b>e</b>) Behavior of Cp during the test, (<b>f</b>) energy generated at the 125 s test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 30
<p>Cp(λ) curve of the Ayanz Wind Turbine based on Screw Blades used for the second set of simulations analyses (Blue: new Cp curve, Yellow: previous tests’ Cp curve) with a shorter range of values with Cpmax.</p>
Full article ">Figure 31
<p>Performance of the Ayanz Wind Turbine based on Screw Blades with Indirect MPPT control and second more peaked curve of Cp = f(λ) (uncertainty at the MPPT curve of 20%, error at the current and voltage sensors of 5%, τ = 1 s at low pass filter, J = 0.15 kgm<sup>2</sup>, V<sub>battery</sub> = 48 V). (<b>a</b>) Wind speed pattern, (<b>b</b>) Tt and Tem performances, (<b>c</b>) achieved rotational speed by the idealised MPPT control, (<b>d</b>) Optimal power with a fictitious turbine with zero inertia (Popt) and actual power generated, (<b>e</b>) Behavior of Cp during the test, (<b>f</b>) energy generated at the 125 s test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 32
<p>Performance of the Ayanz Wind Turbine based on Screw Blades with Only-Rectifier power conversion system and second more peaked curve of Cp = f(λ) (J = 0.15 kgm<sup>2</sup>, V<sub>battery</sub> = 36 V). (<b>a</b>) Wind speed pattern, (<b>b</b>) Tt and Tem performances, (<b>c</b>) achieved rotational speed by the idealized MPPT control, (<b>d</b>) Optimal power with a fictitious turbine with zero inertia (Popt) and actual power generated, (<b>e</b>) Behavior of Cp during the test, (<b>f</b>) energy generated at the 125 s test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 33
<p>Performance of the Ayanz Wind Turbine based on Screw Blades with pseudo-MPPT power conversion system (series external C = 0.1 mF at three phases) and second more peaked curve of Cp = f(λ) (J = 0.15 kgm<sup>2</sup>, V<sub>battery</sub> = 36 V). (<b>a</b>) Wind speed pattern, (<b>b</b>) Tt and Tem performances, (<b>c</b>) achieved rotational speed by the idealized MPPT control, (<b>d</b>) Optimal power with a fictitious turbine with zero inertia (Popt) and actual power generated, (<b>e</b>) Behaviour of Cp during the test, (<b>f</b>) energy generated at the 125 s test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 34
<p>The flowchart shows the optimization-based method that can be applied to evaluate which electric power configuration is the most appropriate for a site with given representative wind patterns.</p>
Full article ">Figure 35
<p>(<b>a</b>) Photo of the Wind maker used for the experimental validation at laboratories of Mondragon University, (<b>b</b>) characteristics of the wind maker [<a href="#B26-smartcities-07-00126" class="html-bibr">26</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 36
<p>(<b>a</b>) Wind measurement points (in red) are taken just in the front area of the turbine, and (b) wind measurements are taken at the wind turbine’s input with the tube (obtained and first published in [<a href="#B26-smartcities-07-00126" class="html-bibr">26</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 37
<p>Power curves of the Ayanz Wind Turbine based on Screw Blades (obtained and first published in [<a href="#B26-smartcities-07-00126" class="html-bibr">26</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 38
<p>Power curves of the Ayanz Wind Turbine based on Screw Blades at constant wind speeds (obtained and first published in [<a href="#B26-smartcities-07-00126" class="html-bibr">26</a>]). (<b>a</b>) Ideal MPPT and Only-Rectifier configurations at different battery voltages (24 V are 2 batteries in series while 40 V are 3 batteries in series). (<b>b</b>) Ideal MPPT, Only-Rectifier and pseudo-MPPT configurations at 40 V of battery voltage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 39
<p>Simplified pattern identification of wind speed measured with XA1000 Lufft anemometer (sample time = 1 s) at a moderately windy day in Mondragon University in the urban area of the city (same wind pattern used in previous simulation-based analysis section).</p>
Full article ">Figure 40
<p>Simplified wind gust pattern used at laboratory tests in subsequent sections.</p>
Full article ">Figure 41
<p>Simplified wind gust pattern used for the experimental tests, and power and energy obtained with the wind turbine.</p>
Full article ">Figure 42
<p>Performance of the Ayanz Wind Turbine with screw blades at variable wind speed tests, with only rectifier power conversion system. (<b>a</b>) 10 s + 10 s wind gust, (<b>b</b>) 20 s + 20 s wind gust, (<b>c</b>) 30 s + 30 s wind gust, (<b>d</b>) 40 s + 40 s wind gust.</p>
Full article ">Figure 43
<p>Performance of the Ayanz Wind Turbine with screw blades at variable wind speed tests, with pseudo-MPPT power conversion system with L = 38 mH. (<b>a</b>) 10 s + 10 s wind gust, (<b>b</b>) 20 s + 20 s wind gust, (<b>c</b>) 30 s + 30 s wind gust, (<b>d</b>) 40 s + 40 s wind gust.</p>
Full article ">Figure 44
<p>Performance of the Ayanz Wind Turbine with screw blades at variable wind speed tests with MPPT. (<b>a</b>) 10 s + 10 s wind gust, (<b>b</b>) 20 s + 20 s wind gust, (<b>c</b>) 30 s + 30 s wind gust, (<b>d</b>) 40 s + 40 s wind gust.</p>
Full article ">Figure 45
<p>Wind speed and wind speed direction on a low-moderate windy day (Anemometer: WMS-21 Wind Station of Omega manufacturer, with sample time = 0.5 s). During the measurements, the wind’s direction is dominantly around 300° (coming from North-West), but during some second intervals, the direction changes quickly dozens of degrees repeatedly.</p>
Full article ">Figure 46
<p>Performance of the Ayanz Wind Turbine with screw blades at variable wind speed tests, with MPPT power conversion system and turbine, initially wrongly oriented. (<b>a</b>) 10 s + 10 s wind gust and turbine initially 15° wrongly oriented, (<b>b</b>) 10 s + 10 s wind gust and turbine initially 45° wrongly oriented, (<b>c</b>) 50 s + 50 s wind gust and turbine initially 15° wrongly oriented, (<b>d</b>) 50 s + 0 s wind gust and turbine initially 45° wrongly oriented.</p>
Full article ">Figure 47
<p>Performance of the Ayanz Wind Turbine with screw blades at repetitive wind gusts tests, with pseudo-MPPT power conversion system with L = 38 mH. (<b>a</b>) 10 s + 10 s repetitive wind gust, (<b>b</b>) 5 s + 5 s repetitive wind gust, (<b>c</b>) 2.5 s + 2.5 s repetitive wind gust.</p>
Full article ">Figure 47 Cont.
<p>Performance of the Ayanz Wind Turbine with screw blades at repetitive wind gusts tests, with pseudo-MPPT power conversion system with L = 38 mH. (<b>a</b>) 10 s + 10 s repetitive wind gust, (<b>b</b>) 5 s + 5 s repetitive wind gust, (<b>c</b>) 2.5 s + 2.5 s repetitive wind gust.</p>
Full article ">Figure 48
<p>Wind patterns in which constant wind speed is maintained at steady-state and consequent wind-power curves provided by wind turbine manufacturers. Note that these types of wind patterns are not typical at city locations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 49
<p>Three possible examples of the power-energy generation situations that can occur with typical simplified ‘ramp-based’ wind patterns. (There may be many other power-energy generation situations since performances like delay, peak power, time at which the peak power occurs, energy area, and so on, can be different depending on the specific MPPT, pseudo-MPPT and Only-Rectifier analysed).</p>
Full article ">Figure 50
<p>Additional information that could be provided by small wind turbines (normally present much smaller inertia than high-power three-bladed wind turbines) should be placed at city locations with varying wind speeds.</p>
Full article ">Figure 51
<p>Simplified representation of a Spiral Archimedes blade in a 3-Bladed Horizontal axis Ayanz Wind Turbine with screw blades.</p>
Full article ">Figure 52
<p>Simplified representation of a horizontal axis 3-bladed wind turbine.</p>
Full article ">Figure 53
<p>Simplified representation of a vertical axis 3-bladed Darrieus type wind turbine.</p>
Full article ">Figure 54
<p>Simplified representation of a Vertical Axis Ayanz-Savonious 3-Bladed wind turbine (* Note that the Savonious patent and Ayanz patent present differences, but the most relevant one is that the Savonious patent considers an embrace of the blades to the central shaft, while in Ayanz patent, the blades are fixed with rods to a distance of the shaft).</p>
Full article ">Figure 55
<p>Inertias were evaluated according to the simplified expressions provided, considering equal wind incident areas in four wind turbines. Areas (m<sup>2</sup>): [0.24,0.44,0.69,0.99].</p>
Full article ">
31 pages, 1117 KiB  
Article
Positive Energy Districts: Fundamentals, Assessment Methodologies, Modeling and Research Gaps
by Anna Kozlowska, Francesco Guarino, Rosaria Volpe, Adriano Bisello, Andrea Gabaldòn, Abolfazl Rezaei, Vicky Albert-Seifried, Beril Alpagut, Han Vandevyvere, Francesco Reda, Giovanni Tumminia, Saeed Ranjbar, Roberta Rincione, Salvatore Cellura, Ursula Eicker, Shokufeh Zamini, Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui, Matthias Haase and Lorenza Di Pilla
Energies 2024, 17(17), 4425; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17174425 - 3 Sep 2024
Viewed by 2582
Abstract
The definition, characterization and implementation of Positive Energy Districts is crucial in the path towards urban decarbonization and energy transition. However, several issues still must be addressed: the need for a clear and comprehensive definition, and the settlement of a consistent design approach [...] Read more.
The definition, characterization and implementation of Positive Energy Districts is crucial in the path towards urban decarbonization and energy transition. However, several issues still must be addressed: the need for a clear and comprehensive definition, and the settlement of a consistent design approach for Positive Energy Districts. As emerged throughout the workshop held during the fourth edition of Smart and Sustainable Planning for Cities and Regions Conference (SSPCR 2022) in Bolzano (Italy), further critical points are also linked to the planning, modeling and assessment steps, besides sustainability aspects and stakeholders’ involvement. The “World Café” methodology adopted during the workshop allowed for simple—but also effective and flexible—group discussions focused on the detection of key PED characteristics, such as morphologic, socio-economic, demographic, technological, quality-of-life and feasibility factors. Four main work groups were defined in order to allow them to share, compare and discuss around five main PED-related topics: energy efficiency, energy flexibility, e-mobility, soft mobility, and low-carbon generation. Indeed, to properly deal with PED challenges and crucial aspects, it is necessary to combine and balance these technologies with enabler factors like financing instruments, social innovation and involvement, innovative governance and far-sighted policies. This paper proposes, in a structured form, the main outcomes of the co-creation approach developed during the workshop. The importance of implementing a holistic approach was highlighted: it requires a systematic and consistent integration of economic, environmental and social aspects directly connected to an interdisciplinary cross-sectorial collaboration between researchers, policymakers, industries, municipalities, and citizens. Furthermore, it was reaffirmed that, to make informed and reasoned decisions throughout an effective PED design and planning process, social, ecological, and cultural factors (besides merely technical aspects) play a crucial role. Thanks to the valuable insights and recommendations gathered from the workshop participants, a conscious awareness of key issues in PED design and implementation emerged, and the fundamental role of stakeholders in the PED development path was confirmed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Smart Electric Energy in Buildings)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Methodology steps.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Overview and categorization of PED modeling insights.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 2178 KiB  
Article
A Distributed Intelligent Lighting Control System Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning
by Peixin Fang, Ming Wang, Jingzheng Li, Qianchuan Zhao, Xuehan Zheng and He Gao
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(16), 9057; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13169057 - 8 Aug 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2886
Abstract
With the rapid development of human society, people’s requirements for lighting are also increasing. The amount of energy consumed by lighting systems in buildings is increasing, but most current lighting systems are inefficient and provide insufficient light comfort. Therefore, this paper proposes an [...] Read more.
With the rapid development of human society, people’s requirements for lighting are also increasing. The amount of energy consumed by lighting systems in buildings is increasing, but most current lighting systems are inefficient and provide insufficient light comfort. Therefore, this paper proposes an intelligent lighting control system based on a distributed architecture, incorporating a dynamic shading system for adjusting the interior lighting environment. The system comprises two subsystems: lighting and shading. The shading subsystem utilizes fuzzy control logic to control lighting based on the room’s temperature and illumination, thereby achieving rapid control with fewer calculations. The lighting subsystem employs a Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG) algorithm to optimize the luminaire dimming problem based on room illuminance in order to maximize user convenience while achieving uniform illumination. This paper also includes the construction of a prototype box on which the system is evaluated in two distinct circumstances. The results of the tests demonstrate that the system functions properly, has stability and real-time performance, and can adapt to complex and variable outdoor environments. The maximum relative error between actual and expected illuminance is less than 10%, and the average relative error is less than 5% when achieving uniform illuminance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Smart Electric Energy in Buildings)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Topology and network connections for a single-story building.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Structure of the fuzzy control system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Fuzzy logic: (<b>a</b>) the blinds’ angle output membership function, (<b>b</b>) indoor temperature input membership function, and (<b>c</b>) indoor illuminance input membership function.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The reinforcement learning interaction process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Structure of strategy neural network and evaluation neural network.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>System control flowchart.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Schematic diagram of shading with blind. (<b>a</b>) Excess room temperature or light; (<b>b</b>) Insufficient room temperature or light.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) Exterior view of the prototype before the installation of the blinds; (<b>b</b>) interior view of the prototype; (<b>c</b>) exterior view of the prototype after the addition of the blinds; and (<b>d</b>) physical model diagram of the blinds.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The hardware configuration for the prototype chamber.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The flowchart of the hardware connections.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Web application interface: (<b>a</b>) login interface, (<b>b</b>) data display interface, (<b>c</b>) mode selection interface, and (<b>d</b>) indoor illuminance threshold selection interface.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Intense natural light testing: (<b>a</b>) natural illumination value, (<b>b</b>) illumination values at indoor test points, (<b>c</b>) luminaire switch-on levels, and (<b>d</b>) blinds’ angle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Weak natural light testing: (<b>a</b>) natural illumination value, (<b>b</b>) illumination values at indoor test points, (<b>c</b>) luminaire switch-on levels, and (<b>d</b>) blinds’ angle.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 3851 KiB  
Article
FastInformer-HEMS: A Lightweight Optimization Algorithm for Home Energy Management Systems
by Xihui Chen and Dejun Ning
Energies 2023, 16(9), 3897; https://doi.org/10.3390/en16093897 - 5 May 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2500
Abstract
In a smart home with distributed energy resources, the home energy management system (HEMS) controls the photovoltaic (PV) storage system by executing the optimization algorithm to achieve the lowest power cost. The existing mixed integer linear programming (MILP) algorithm is not suitable for [...] Read more.
In a smart home with distributed energy resources, the home energy management system (HEMS) controls the photovoltaic (PV) storage system by executing the optimization algorithm to achieve the lowest power cost. The existing mixed integer linear programming (MILP) algorithm is not suitable for execution on the end-user side due to its high computational complexity. The HEMS algorithm based on a long short-term memory neural network (LSTM-HEMS) can effectively solve the problem of the high computational complexity of MILP, but its optimization outcome is not high due to the accumulation of prediction errors. In order to achieve a better balance between computational complexity and optimization outcome, this paper proposes a lightweight optimization algorithm called the FastInformer-HEMS, which introduces the E-Attn attention mechanism based on Informer and uses global average pooling to extract the attention characteristics. Meanwhile, the proposed method introduces the maximum self-consumption algorithm as a backup strategy to ensure the safe operation of the system. The simulated results show that the computational complexity of the proposed FastInformer-HEMS is the lowest among the existing algorithms. Compared with the existing LSTM-HEMS, the proposed algorithm reduces the power consumption cost by 12.3% and 6.6% in the two typical scenarios, while the execution time decreases by 13.6 times. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Smart Electric Energy in Buildings)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>System architecture in a smart home.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Main types of multi-horizon forecasting models. (<b>a</b>) Iterative one-step; (<b>b</b>) multi-step.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Framework of FastInformer-HEMS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Alternate safe policy.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Policy generation process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>FastInformer model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Attention module. (<b>a</b>) ProbSparse attention; (<b>b</b>) E-Attn attention.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Information of electricity price.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Prediction of battery’s energy level in scenario one.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Prediction of battery’s energy level in scenario two.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Optimization results of algorithms in scenario one. (<b>a</b>) MILP; (<b>b</b>) LSTM-HEMS; (<b>c</b>) Informer-HEMS; (<b>d</b>) FastInformer-HEMS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Optimization results of algorithms in scenario two. (<b>a</b>) MILP; (<b>b</b>) LSTM-HEMS; (<b>c</b>) Informer-HEMS; (<b>d</b>) FastInformer-HEMS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12 Cont.
<p>Optimization results of algorithms in scenario two. (<b>a</b>) MILP; (<b>b</b>) LSTM-HEMS; (<b>c</b>) Informer-HEMS; (<b>d</b>) FastInformer-HEMS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Policy execution time comparison.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 2094 KiB  
Article
Non-Intrusive Load Decomposition Based on Instance-Batch Normalization Networks
by Mao Wang, Dandan Liu and Changzhi Li
Energies 2023, 16(7), 2940; https://doi.org/10.3390/en16072940 - 23 Mar 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1393
Abstract
At present, the non-intrusive load decomposition method for low-frequency sampling data is as yet insufficient within the context of generalization performance, failing to meet the decomposition accuracy requirements when applied to novel scenarios. To address this issue, a non-intrusive load decomposition method based [...] Read more.
At present, the non-intrusive load decomposition method for low-frequency sampling data is as yet insufficient within the context of generalization performance, failing to meet the decomposition accuracy requirements when applied to novel scenarios. To address this issue, a non-intrusive load decomposition method based on instance-batch normalization network is proposed. This method uses an encoder-decoder structure with attention mechanism, in which skip connections are introduced at the corresponding layers of the encoder and decoder. In this way, the decoder can reconstruct a more accurate power sequence of the target. The proposed model was tested on two public datasets, REDD and UKDALE, and the performance was compared with mainstream algorithms. The results show that the F1 score was higher by an average of 18.4 when compared with mainstream algorithms. Additionally, the mean absolute error reduced by an average of 25%, and the root mean square error was reduced by an average of 22%. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Smart Electric Energy in Buildings)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flow chart of load decomposition in this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Model structure diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>IBN-Net structure diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Structure of attention mechanism.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Graph of the trend of loss for a particular training session.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Example graph of experimental results of the same house (<b>a</b>) Refrigerator (<b>b</b>) Dishwasher (<b>c</b>) Microwave (<b>d</b>) Washing machine.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparison of the results of several algorithms for different house experiments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Comparison of CTL experimental results.</p>
Full article ">
26 pages, 35113 KiB  
Article
Smarter Together: Monitoring and Evaluation of Integrated Building Solutions for Low-Energy Districts of Lighthouse Cities Lyon, Munich, and Vienna
by Ali Hainoun, Hans-Martin Neumann, Naomi Morishita-Steffen, Baptiste Mougeot, Étienne Vignali, Florian Mandel, Felix Hörmann, Sebastian Stortecky, Katharina Walter, Martin Kaltenhauser-Barth, Bojan Schnabl, Stephan Hartmann, Maxime Valentin, Bruno Gaiddon, Samuel Martin and Benoit Rozel
Energies 2022, 15(19), 6907; https://doi.org/10.3390/en15196907 - 21 Sep 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3034
Abstract
The Smarter Together project implemented in the three lighthouse cities (LHCs) of Lyon, Munich, and Vienna a set of co-created and integrated smart solutions for a better life in urban districts. The implemented solutions have been monitored using a novel integrated monitoring methodology [...] Read more.
The Smarter Together project implemented in the three lighthouse cities (LHCs) of Lyon, Munich, and Vienna a set of co-created and integrated smart solutions for a better life in urban districts. The implemented solutions have been monitored using a novel integrated monitoring methodology (IMM) following a co-creation process involving key stakeholders of the LHCs. With focus on holistic building refurbishment and the integration of onsite renewable energy supply (RES), the three LHCs refurbished around 117,497 m2 of floor area and constructed 12,446 m2 of new floor area. They implemented around 833 kWp of PV, 35 kW of solar thermal and 13,122 kW of geothermal heating systems. Altogether, the realized solutions for low-energy districts in the three LHCs will annually save around 4000 MWh/a, generate 1145 MWh/a of RES and reduce around 1496 tCO2/a of CO2 emissions, corresponding to specific values of 37.6 kWh/m2.a and 11.9 kg-CO2/m2.a for final energy saving and CO2 emission reductions, respectively. KPI-based monitoring and evaluation of the implemented solutions provides qualitative and quantitative insight, experience and lessons learned to optimize the process of implementation and deployment of integrated solutions for holistic building refurbishment, and thus contribute to advancing sustainable urban transformation at the district level for both LHCs and FCs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Smart Electric Energy in Buildings)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Clusters of co-created, smart, and integrated solutions implemented within the Smarter Together project [<a href="#B34-energies-15-06907" class="html-bibr">34</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Lighthouse cities (LHCs) and follower cities (FCs) of the Smarter Together project as well as the LHCs of other EU projects that started in 2014.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The Confluence district in Lyon (<b>left</b>) and Cité Perrache building after refurbishment (<b>right</b>). © SPL Lyon Confluence [<a href="#B36-energies-15-06907" class="html-bibr">36</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Neuaubing–Westkreuz in Munich (<b>left</b>) and Radolfzeller Str. 40–46 building after refurbishment (<b>right</b>) (Stoppel &amp; Klassen, 2019) [<a href="#B41-energies-15-06907" class="html-bibr">41</a>]. The project area is outlined with a dotted gray line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Simmering district in Vienna (<b>left</b>) and Hauffgasse 37–47 after refurbishment (<b>right</b>) [<a href="#B35-energies-15-06907" class="html-bibr">35</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Flow diagram of the integrated monitoring process for the demonstration sites of the LHCs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Schematic monitoring setup of the building complex of Hauffgasse, Vienna demonstration site.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Main steps of the cleaning process for the measured raw data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Monitoring data from the space-heating consumption meter for the accumulated meter data and the hourly heat consumption, Hauffgasse, Vienna.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Monthly space-heat demand for 2019 and 2020, Hauffgasse, Vienna.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Monitored data of PV production on 8th and 9th August, Hauffgasse, Vienna. 8th and 9th August 2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Monitoring data of electricity consumption of elevators, lighting, substations and ventilation, 61 Delandine, Lyon.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Climate-adjusted annual space-heating demand determined as weighted average value over the whole refurbished floor area (for each LHC as well as all LHCs).</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Specific final energy saving, and CO<sub>2</sub> emission reduction determined as weighted average value over the whole refurbished floor area (for each LHC as well as all LHCs).</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Monthly electricity production of the implemented roof-top PV panels selected among the three LHCs (<b>a</b>) in Lyon, (<b>b</b>) in Munich and (<b>c</b>) in Vienna.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 3546 KiB  
Article
Short-Term Load Forecasting on Individual Consumers
by João Victor Jales Melo, George Rossany Soares Lira, Edson Guedes Costa, Antonio F. Leite Neto and Iago B. Oliveira
Energies 2022, 15(16), 5856; https://doi.org/10.3390/en15165856 - 12 Aug 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2248
Abstract
Maintaining stability and control over the electric system requires increasing information about the consumers’ profiling due to changes in the form of electricity generation and consumption. To overcome this trouble, short-term load forecasting (STLF) on individual consumers gained importance in the last years. [...] Read more.
Maintaining stability and control over the electric system requires increasing information about the consumers’ profiling due to changes in the form of electricity generation and consumption. To overcome this trouble, short-term load forecasting (STLF) on individual consumers gained importance in the last years. Nonetheless, predicting the profile of an individual consumer is a difficult task. The main challenge lies in the uncertainty related to the individual consumption profile, which increases forecasting errors. Thus, this paper aims to implement a load predictive model focused on individual consumers taking into account its randomness. For this purpose, a methodology is proposed to determine and select predictive features for individual STLF. The load forecasting of an individual consumer is simulated based on the four main machine learning techniques used in the literature. A 2.73% reduction in the forecast error is obtained after the correct selection of the predictive features. Compared to the baseline model (persistent forecasting method), the error is reduced by up to 19.8%. Among the techniques analyzed, support vector regression (SVR) showed the smallest errors (8.88% and 9.31%). Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Smart Electric Energy in Buildings)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flowchart of the methodology used.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Proposed solution for extracting features and selecting the most important ones.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Predictive models for SVR and ARTMAP-Fuzzy network with a horizon of (<b>a</b>) 30 min and (<b>b</b>) 6 h.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Predictive models for MLP and LSTM networks with a horizon of (<b>a</b>) 30 min and (<b>b</b>) 6 h.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Bar graph of the correction of each feature with the forecast of energy consumption.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Normalized mutual information to each pair of features.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Load forecasting by the SVR model with 30-min time horizon.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 12271 KiB  
Article
Modeling and Simulation of Household Appliances Power Consumption
by Daniel Villanueva, Diego San-Facundo, Edelmiro Miguez-García and Antonio Fernández-Otero
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(7), 3689; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12073689 - 6 Apr 2022
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 4636
Abstract
The consumption of household appliances tends to increase. Therefore, the application of energy efficiency measurements is urgently needed to reduce the levels of power consumption. Over the last years, various methods have been used to predict household electricity consumption. As a novelty, this [...] Read more.
The consumption of household appliances tends to increase. Therefore, the application of energy efficiency measurements is urgently needed to reduce the levels of power consumption. Over the last years, various methods have been used to predict household electricity consumption. As a novelty, this paper proposed a method of predicting the consumption of household appliances by evaluating statistical distributions (Kolmogorov–Smirnov Test and Pearson’s X2 test). To test the veracity of the evaluations, first, a set of random values was simulated for each hour, and their respective averages were calculated. These were compared with the averages of the real values for each hour. With the exception of HVAC during working days, great results were obtained. For the refrigerator, the maximum error was 3.91%, while for the lighting, it was 4.27%. At the point of consumption, the accuracy was even higher, with an error of 1.17% for the dryer while for the washing machine and dishwasher, their minimum errors were less than 1%. The error results confirm that the applied methodology is perfectly acceptable for modeling household appliance consumption and consequently predicting it. However, these consumptions can be only extrapolated to dwellings with similar surface areas and habitats. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Smart Electric Energy in Buildings)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flowchart of the sequence of statistical distributions evaluations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flowchart of the comparison between random and real consumptions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Flowchart of the treatment of the punctual consumptions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Random (blue) and real (orange) average consumption of the lighting during working days.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Random (blue) and real (orange) average consumption of the lighting during Saturdays.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Random (blue) and real (orange) average consumption of the lighting during Sundays.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Random (blue) and real (orange) average consumption of the refrigerator during working days.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Random (blue) and real (orange) average consumption of the refrigerator during Saturdays.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Random (blue) and real (orange) average consumption of the refrigerator during Sundays.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Random (blue) and real (orange) average consumption of HVAC during working days.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Random (blue) and real (orange) average consumption of HVAC during Saturdays.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Random (blue) and real (orange) average consumption of HVAC during Sundays.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Random (blue) and real (orange) average consumption of the dryer whose duration is 40 min during working days.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Random (blue and yellow) and real (orange and purple) averages consumption of the washing machine, whose durations are 10 and 70 min during working days.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Random (blue and purple) and real (red and orange) averages consumption of the dishwasher whose durations are 30 and 40 min during working days.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop