[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 

Topic Editors

Department of Construction Management, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204, USA
IMT Nord Europe, Institut Mines-Télécom, LGCGE, ULR, 4515 Douai, France

Green Construction Materials and Construction Innovation

Abstract submission deadline
20 October 2025
Manuscript submission deadline
20 December 2025
Viewed by
664

Topic Information

Dear Colleagues,

The multidisciplinary Topic “Green Construction Materials and Construction Innovation” serves as a vital platform for advancing the understanding and application of sustainable practices in the construction industry. It focuses on cutting-edge research, technological advancements, and innovative approaches that promote environmental stewardship while enhancing construction efficiency and performance. The journal highlights key themes, including the development and use of eco-friendly materials such as recycled aggregates, low-carbon concrete, bio-composites, and alternative binders. It also explores innovations in materials science, such as self-healing materials, 3D-printed components, and smart construction technologies that reduce environmental footprints. In addition, the journal emphasizes the integration of advanced methodologies, such as life cycle assessment (LCA), artificial intelligence, and machine learning, to evaluate and optimize the environmental, economic, and social impacts of construction materials and processes. It features case studies, experimental research, and theoretical analyses that showcase practical applications of green construction principles in real-world projects. By fostering interdisciplinary collaboration among engineers, architects, researchers, and policymakers, the journal aims to address the challenges of urbanization, resource scarcity, and climate change. Its contributions provide valuable insights for building a sustainable future through responsible material selection, innovative construction techniques, and transformative industry practices.

Prof. Dr. Ahmed Senouci
Dr. Walid Maherzi
Topic Editors

Keywords

  • low-carbon construction
  • recycled aggregates
  • alternative binders
  • self-healing materials
  • 3D printing in construction
  • circular economy in construction
  • energy-efficient materials
  • bio-based construction materials
  • machine learning in material design
  • net-zero construction

Participating Journals

Journal Name Impact Factor CiteScore Launched Year First Decision (median) APC
Buildings
buildings
3.1 3.4 2011 15.3 Days CHF 2600 Submit
Construction Materials
constrmater
- - 2021 20.8 Days CHF 1000 Submit
Materials
materials
3.1 5.8 2008 13.9 Days CHF 2600 Submit
Sustainability
sustainability
3.3 6.8 2009 19.7 Days CHF 2400 Submit

Preprints.org is a multidiscipline platform providing preprint service that is dedicated to sharing your research from the start and empowering your research journey.

MDPI Topics is cooperating with Preprints.org and has built a direct connection between MDPI journals and Preprints.org. Authors are encouraged to enjoy the benefits by posting a preprint at Preprints.org prior to publication:

  1. Immediately share your ideas ahead of publication and establish your research priority;
  2. Protect your idea from being stolen with this time-stamped preprint article;
  3. Enhance the exposure and impact of your research;
  4. Receive feedback from your peers in advance;
  5. Have it indexed in Web of Science (Preprint Citation Index), Google Scholar, Crossref, SHARE, PrePubMed, Scilit and Europe PMC.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Journals
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
21 pages, 3022 KiB  
Article
Carbonated Aggregates and Basalt Fiber-Reinforced Polymers: Advancing Sustainable Concrete for Structural Use
by Rabee Shamass, Vireen Limbachiya, Oluwatoyin Ajibade, Musab Rabi, Hector Ulises Levatti Lopez and Xiangming Zhou
Buildings 2025, 15(5), 775; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15050775 - 26 Feb 2025
Viewed by 220
Abstract
In the transition towards a circular economy, redesigning construction materials for enhanced sustainability becomes crucial. To contribute to this goal, this paper investigates the integration of carbonated aggregates (CAs) and basalt fibre-reinforced polymers (BFRPs) in concrete infrastructures as an alternative to natural sand [...] Read more.
In the transition towards a circular economy, redesigning construction materials for enhanced sustainability becomes crucial. To contribute to this goal, this paper investigates the integration of carbonated aggregates (CAs) and basalt fibre-reinforced polymers (BFRPs) in concrete infrastructures as an alternative to natural sand (NS) and steel reinforcement. CA is manufactured using accelerated carbonation that utilizes CO2 to turn industrial byproducts into mineralised products. The structural performance of CA and BFRP-reinforced concrete simply supported slab was investigated through conducting a series of experimental tests to assess the key structural parameters, including bond strength, bearing capacity, failure behavior, and cracking bbehaviour. Carbon footprint analysis (CFA) was conducted to understand the environmental impact of incorporating BFRP and CA. The results indicate that CA exhibits a higher water absorption rate compared to NS. As the CA ratio increased, the ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV), compressive, tensile, and flexural strength decreased, and the absorption capacity of concrete increased. Furthermore, incorporating 25% CA in concrete has no significant effect on the bond strength of BFRP. However, the load capacity decreased with an increasing CA replacement ratio. Finally, integrating BFRP and 50% of CA into concrete slabs reduced the slab’s CFA by 9.7% when compared with steel-reinforced concrete (RC) slabs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Green Construction Materials and Construction Innovation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Particle size distribution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) The CA used in this study; (<b>b</b>) the BFRP and steel bars.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Pull-out test. (<b>a</b>) The sample preparation; (<b>b</b>) a schematic of the pull-out specimen.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) The slab mould showing the reinforcement arrangements; (<b>b</b>) a diagram illustrating the elevation and end-view of the slab specimens.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Ultrasonic pulse velocity testing; (<b>b</b>) the testing arrangement for the pull-out; (<b>c</b>) the testing arrangement of the slabs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>UPV and absorption capacity for different mixes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Mechanical properties of concrete mixes at twenty-eight days.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Bond–slip curves for steel and BFRP samples with different carbonated aggregate content.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The load–deflection relationship of the slabs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Failure modes of the tested slabs.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop