[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (5,786)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = vegetation cover

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 3951 KiB  
Article
Geographical Distribution, Host Range and Genetic Diversity of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense Causing Fusarium Wilt of Banana in India
by Raman Thangavelu, Hadimani Amaresh, Muthukathan Gopi, Murugan Loganathan, Boopathy Nithya, Perumal Ganga Devi, Chelliah Anuradha, Anbazhagan Thirugnanavel, Kalyansing Baburao Patil, Guy Blomme and Ramasamy Selvarajan
J. Fungi 2024, 10(12), 887; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10120887 (registering DOI) - 21 Dec 2024
Abstract
Fusarium wilt of banana is a major production constraint in India, prompting banana growers to replace bananas with less remunerative crops. Effective disease management practices thus need to be developed and implemented to prevent further spread and damage caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. [...] Read more.
Fusarium wilt of banana is a major production constraint in India, prompting banana growers to replace bananas with less remunerative crops. Effective disease management practices thus need to be developed and implemented to prevent further spread and damage caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense (Foc), the cause of Fusarium wilt. Currently, knowledge of disease incidence, affected varieties, and the geographical spread of Foc races in India are only scantily available. An extensive field survey was conducted in 53 districts of 16 major banana-growing states of and one union territory of India that covered both tropical and subtropical regions. Disease incidence ranged from 0 to 95% on farms, with Cavendish bananas (AAA) most affected. No Fusarium wilt symptoms due to Foc R1 were observed in Nendran (AAB) or Red Banana (AAA) in South India. During the survey, 293 Foc isolates were collected from Cavendish, Pisang Awak (ABB), Silk (AAB), Monthan (ABB), Neypoovan (AB), and Mysore (AAB) bananas. Isolate diversity was assessed through Vegetative Compatibility Group (VCG) analyses, sequencing of EF1α gene sequences, phylogenetic analyses, and characterisation by SIX gene composition. Thirteen VCGs were identified, of which VCGs 0124, 0125, 01220, and 01213/16 were dominant and infected Cavendish bananas. Phylogenetic analysis divided the Indian Foc isolates into race 1 (R1), subtropical race 4 (STR4), and tropical race 4 (TR4). Secreted in Xylem (SIX) gene analyses indicated that the effector genes SIX4 and SIX6 were present in the VCGs 0124, 0124/5, 0125, and 01220 of race 1, SIX7 was present only in Foc STR4, and SIX8 was found only in Foc R4 (TR4 and STR4) isolates. Insights into the geographical distribution of Foc races, and their interactions with banana varieties, can guide integrated disease management intervention strategies across India. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>VCG’s of <span class="html-italic">Fusarium oxysporum</span> f. sp. <span class="html-italic">cubense</span> race 1 causing infection of Cavendish cv. Grand Nain plantlets in a glass house. (<b>A</b>) Cross-section of rhizome infected by VCG0124; (<b>B</b>) VCG 01220; (<b>C</b>) VCG0125 and (<b>D</b>) VCG0124/5.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Number of <span class="html-italic">Fusarium oxysporum</span> f. sp. <span class="html-italic">cubense</span> VCGs associated with major commercial bananas grown in India.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Geographical distribution of <span class="html-italic">Fusarium oxysporum</span> f. sp. <span class="html-italic">cubense</span> races in different banana-growing states of India.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Phylogenetic tree constructed using the maximum likelihood method based on the TEF-1α gene sequences data of 46 representative <span class="html-italic">Fusarium oxysporum</span> f. sp. <span class="html-italic">cubense</span> (<span class="html-italic">Foc</span>) isolates associated with banana grown in India. The analysis was carried out with the TEF-1α sequences of Indian <span class="html-italic">Foc</span> isolates combined with sequences from <span class="html-italic">F. equiseti</span> (MZ669768.1 and KX463032), <span class="html-italic">Foc</span> TR4 of China (OR865337) and Malaysia (MH 484989), and <span class="html-italic">Foc</span> R1 of Central Africa (KX365413) and China (JX294964). Bootstrap values greater than 60% are indicated for maximum likelihood internodes where relevant. The scale bar corresponds to 0.10 nucleotide substitutions per site. The tree is rooted with two isolates of <span class="html-italic">Fusarium equiseti</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Distribution of effector-based <span class="html-italic">SIX</span> genes in different strains of <span class="html-italic">Fusarium oxysporum</span> f. sp. <span class="html-italic">cubense</span> (<span class="html-italic">Foc</span>) in India: (<b>A</b>) amplicons of SIX1F/SIX1R primer set for <span class="html-italic">Foc</span> R1, <span class="html-italic">Foc</span> TR4, and <span class="html-italic">Foc</span> STR4; (<b>B</b>) amplicons of SIX2F/SIX2R primer set for <span class="html-italic">Foc</span> R1, <span class="html-italic">Foc</span> TR4, and <span class="html-italic">Foc</span> STR4; (<b>C</b>) amplicons of SIX4F/SIX4R primer set for <span class="html-italic">Foc</span> R1, <span class="html-italic">Foc</span> TR4, and <span class="html-italic">Foc</span> STR4; (<b>D</b>) amplicons of SIX6F/SIX6R primer set for <span class="html-italic">Foc</span> R1, <span class="html-italic">Foc</span> TR4, and <span class="html-italic">Foc</span> STR4; (<b>E</b>) amplicons of SIX7F/SIX7R primer set for <span class="html-italic">Foc</span> R1, <span class="html-italic">Foc</span> TR4, and <span class="html-italic">Foc</span> STR4; (<b>F</b>) amplicons of SIX8F/SIX8R primer set for <span class="html-italic">Foc</span> R1, <span class="html-italic">Foc</span> TR4, and <span class="html-italic">Foc</span> STR4; (<b>G</b>) amplicons of SIX9F/SIX9R primer set for <span class="html-italic">Foc</span> R1, <span class="html-italic">Foc</span> TR4, and <span class="html-italic">Foc</span> STR4; (<b>H</b>) amplicons of SIX13F/SIX13R primer set for <span class="html-italic">Foc</span> R1, <span class="html-italic">Foc</span> TR4, and <span class="html-italic">Foc</span> STR4. Lane M: Ladder; Lane 1–6: <span class="html-italic">Foc</span> R1(VCG 01220, 0124/5, 0124, 0125); Lane 7–11: <span class="html-italic">Foc</span> TR4(VCG 01213/16); Lane 12: <span class="html-italic">Foc</span> STR4(VCG 0120).</p>
Full article ">
26 pages, 10271 KiB  
Article
Monitoring and Mapping a Decade of Regenerative Agricultural Practices Across the Contiguous United States
by Matthew O. Jones, Gleyce Figueiredo, Stephanie Howson, Ana Toro, Soren Rundquist, Gregory Garner, Facundo Della Nave, Grace Delgado, Zhuang-Fang Yi, Priscilla Ahn, Samuel Jonathan Barrett, Marie Bader, Derek Rollend, Thaïs Bendixen, Jeff Albrecht, Kangogo Sogomo, Zam Zam Musse and John Shriver
Land 2024, 13(12), 2246; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13122246 (registering DOI) - 21 Dec 2024
Abstract
Satellite remote sensing enables monitoring of regenerative agriculture practices, such as crop rotation, cover cropping, and conservation tillage to allow tracking and quantification at unprecedented scales. The Monitor system presented here capitalizes on the scope and scale of these data by integrating crop [...] Read more.
Satellite remote sensing enables monitoring of regenerative agriculture practices, such as crop rotation, cover cropping, and conservation tillage to allow tracking and quantification at unprecedented scales. The Monitor system presented here capitalizes on the scope and scale of these data by integrating crop identification, cover cropping, and tillage intensity estimations annually at field scales across the contiguous United States (CONUS) from 2014 to 2023. The results provide the first ever mapping of these practices at this temporal fidelity and spatial scale, unlocking valuable insights for sustainable agricultural management. Monitor incorporates three datasets: CropID, a deep learning transformer model using Sentinel-2 and USDA Cropland Data Layer (CDL) data from 2018 to 2023 to predict annual crop types; the living root data, which use Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) data to determine cover crop presence through regional parameterization; and residue cover (RC) data, which uses the Normalized Difference Tillage Index (NDTI) and crop residue cover (CRC) index to assess tillage intensity. The system calculates field-scale statistics and integrates these components to compile a comprehensive field management history. Results are validated with 35,184 ground-truth data points from 19 U.S. states, showing an overall accuracy of 80% for crop identification, 78% for cover crop detection, and 63% for tillage intensity. Also, comparisons with USDA NASS Ag Census data indicate that cover crop adoption rates were within 20% of estimates for 90% of states in 2017 and 81% in 2022, while for conventional tillage, 52% and 25% of states were within 20% of estimates, increasing to 75% and 67% for conservation tillage. Monitor provides a comprehensive view of regenerative practices by crop season for all of CONUS across a decade, supporting decision-making for sustainable agricultural management including associated outcomes such as reductions in emissions, long term yield resiliency, and supply chain stability. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The spatial distribution and source of field data. Record counts are aggregated and displayed by county.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic of the data processing pipeline used by Monitor to generate field-scale assessments of regenerative agricultural practices.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Percentage agreement between crop identification model and ground-truth data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Average acres of cover crop by county for years 2014–2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Percentage agreement between cover crop determination and ground-truth data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Average acres of conservation tillage by county for years 2014–2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Percentage agreement between tillage practice determination and ground-truth data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Difference between the Ag Census cover crop adoption percentage and the Monitor cover crop adoption percentage, for years 2017 and 2022, by state (<b>top</b>) and county (<b>bottom</b>). Uncertainty bars are the 5th–95th percentile interval as derived from bootstrapping the reported confidence values in the Ag Census data for cover crop acreage and total agricultural land acreage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>An empirical cumulative distribution function of the medians of the differences between the Ag Census cover crop adoption percentage and the Monitor cover crop adoption percentage by state (<b>left</b>) and by county (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Percentage of agricultural land by state that was planted to cover crops from the Ag Census (<b>left</b>) and percent cover crop by state as determined by Monitor (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Difference between the Ag Census conventional tillage practice percentage and the Monitor conventional tillage practice percentage, for years 2017 and 2022, by state (<b>top</b>) and county (<b>bottom</b>). Uncertainty bars are the 5th–95th percentile interval as derived from bootstrapping the reported confidence values in the Ag Census data for conventional tillage practice acreage and total agricultural land acreage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>An empirical cumulative distribution function of the medians of the differences between the Ag Census conventional tillage practice percentage and the Monitor conventional tillage practice percentage by state (<b>left</b>) and by county (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>The difference between the Ag Census conservation tillage practice percentage and the Monitor conservation tillage practice percentage, for years 2017 and 2022, by state (<b>top</b>) and county (<b>bottom</b>). Uncertainty bars are the 5th–95th percentile interval as derived from bootstrapping the reported confidence values in the Ag Census data for the reduced-till acreage, no-till acreage, and total agricultural land acreage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>An empirical cumulative distribution function of the medians of the differences between the Ag Census conservation tillage practice percentage and the Monitor conservation tillage practice percentage by state (<b>left</b>) and by county (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Percentage of agricultural land by state that adopts conventional tillage (<b>left</b>) and conservation tillage (<b>right</b>; inclusive of no tillage) as determined by the USDA-NASS agricultural census and Monitor.</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 8692 KiB  
Article
Monitoring Spatial-Temporal Variability of Vegetation Coverage and Its Influencing Factors in the Yellow River Source Region from 2000 to 2020
by Boyang Wang, Jianhua Si, Bing Jia, Xiaohui He, Dongmeng Zhou, Xinglin Zhu, Zijin Liu, Boniface Ndayambaza and Xue Bai
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(24), 4772; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16244772 (registering DOI) - 21 Dec 2024
Abstract
As a vital conservation area for water sources in the Yellow River Basin, understanding the spatial-temporal dynamics of vegetation coverage is crucial, along with the factors that affect it, to ensure ecological preservation and sustainable development of the Yellow River Source Region (YRSR). [...] Read more.
As a vital conservation area for water sources in the Yellow River Basin, understanding the spatial-temporal dynamics of vegetation coverage is crucial, along with the factors that affect it, to ensure ecological preservation and sustainable development of the Yellow River Source Region (YRSR). In this paper, we utilized Landsat surface reflectance data from 2000 to 2020 using de-clouding and masking methods implementing the Google Earth Engine (GEE) cloud platform. We investigated spatial-temporal changes in vegetation coverage by combining the maximum value composite (MVC), the dimidiate pixel model (DPM), the Theil–Sen median slope, and the Mann–Kendall test. The influencing factors on vegetation coverage were quantitatively analyzed using a geographic detector, and future tendencies in vegetation coverage were predicted utilizing the Future Land Use Simulation (FLUS) model. The outcomes suggested the following: (1) On the temporal scale, vegetation coverage exhibited a general upward trend between 2000 and 2020, with the YRSR showing a yearly growth rate of 0.23% (p < 0.001). In comparison to 2000, the area designated as having extremely high vegetation coverage increased by 19.3% in 2020. (2) Spatially, the central and southeast regions have higher values of vegetation coverage, whereas the northwest has lower values. In the study area, 75.5% of the region demonstrated a significant improvement trend, primarily in Xinghai County, Zeku County, and Dari County in the south and the northern portion of the YRSR; conversely, a notable tendency of degradation was identified in 11.8% of the area, mostly in the southeastern areas of Qumalai County, Chenduo County, Shiqu County, and scattered areas in the southeastern region. (3) With an explanatory power of exceeding 45%, the three influencing factors that had the biggest effects on vegetation coverage were mean annual temperature, elevation, and mean annual precipitation. Mean annual precipitation has been shown to have a major impact on vegetation covering; the interconnections involving these factors have increased the explanatory power of vegetation coverage’s regional distribution. (4) Predictions for 2030 show that the vegetation coverage is trending upward in the YRSR, with a notable recovery trend in the northwestern region. This study supplies a theoretical foundation to formulate strategies to promote sustainable development and ecological environmental preservation in the YRSR. Full article
20 pages, 9360 KiB  
Article
Distribution and Long-Term Variation of Wetland Land Cover Types in the Yellow River Delta Remote Sensing Monitoring
by Chao Zhou, Qian Zhao, Tong Wu, Xulong Liu and Yanlong Chen
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12(12), 2345; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12122345 (registering DOI) - 20 Dec 2024
Abstract
Wetlands are dubbed the “kidneys of the earth” and are involved in climate regulation, carbon sequestration, ecological balance preservation, and reducing the surface water pollution. Ongoing economic development has introduced pressing challenges to wetland environments. In this context, extracting coastal wetland information and [...] Read more.
Wetlands are dubbed the “kidneys of the earth” and are involved in climate regulation, carbon sequestration, ecological balance preservation, and reducing the surface water pollution. Ongoing economic development has introduced pressing challenges to wetland environments. In this context, extracting coastal wetland information and monitoring the dynamic changes are essential. Using long-term sequence Sentinel-2 satellite remote sensing images and field observations, this research proposed a Dynamic Bayesian Network classification model framework based on conjugate gradient updates. We compared the wetland feature extraction effects of the Fletcher–Reeves and the Polak–Ribière–Polyak algorithms of the conjugate gradient. Then, remote sensing combined with the FRDBN classification model was used to extract the information pertinent to wetland feature types and changes in wetland areas and analyze alterations in the distribution characteristics of land cover types. The results showed that the FRDBN model achieved high accuracy (above 96%), and kappa coefficients exceeded 0.96. Long-term monitoring revealed that the area of wetlands increased by 0.85 × 104 hm2 from 2016 to 2021. Non-aquatic land cover types exhibited pronounced dynamic changes, with the area of change representing 58–69% of the monitored total. Specifically, the transition between salt marsh vegetation and artificial wetlands was relatively obvious. The FRDBN model provides a new method for extracting wetland feature information. Wetland protection, dynamic monitoring, and carbon sink research can provide robust technology support, facilitating investigations into coastal salt marsh carbon sinks and technological advances in carbon sink assessment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Advances in Marine Remote Sensing Applications)
23 pages, 12454 KiB  
Article
Soil Salinity Detection and Mapping by Multi-Temporal Landsat Data: Zaghouan Case Study (Tunisia)
by Karem Saad, Amjad Kallel, Fabio Castaldi and Thouraya Sahli Chahed
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(24), 4761; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16244761 (registering DOI) - 20 Dec 2024
Abstract
Soil salinity is considered one of the biggest constraints to crop production, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions affected by recurrent and long periods of drought, where high salinity levels severely impact plant stress and consequently agricultural production. Climate change accelerates soil salinization, [...] Read more.
Soil salinity is considered one of the biggest constraints to crop production, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions affected by recurrent and long periods of drought, where high salinity levels severely impact plant stress and consequently agricultural production. Climate change accelerates soil salinization, driven by factors such as soil conditions, land use/land cover changes, and water deficits, over extensive spatial and temporal scales. Continuous monitoring of areas at risk of salinization plays a critical role in supporting effective land management and enhancing agricultural production. For these purposes, this work aims to propose a spatiotemporal method for monitoring soil salinization using spectral indices derived from Earth observation data. The proposed approach was tested in the Zaghouan Region in northeastern Tunisia, a region where soils are characterized by alarming levels of salinization. To address this concern, remote sensing techniques were applied for the analysis of satellite imagery generated from Landsat 5, Landsat 8, and Landsat 9 missions. A comprehensive field survey complemented this approach, involving the collection of 229 geo-referenced soil samples. These samples were representative of distinct soil salinity classes, including non-saline, slightly saline, moderately saline, strongly saline, and very strongly saline soils. Soil salinity modeling using Landsat-8 OLI data revealed that the SI-5 index provided the most accurate predictions, with an R2 of 0.67 and an RMSE of 0.12 dS/m. By 2023, 42.3% of the study area was classified as strongly or very strongly saline, indicating a significant increase in salinity over time. This rise in salinity corresponds to notable land use and land cover (LULC) changes, as 55.9% of the study area experienced LULC shifts between 2000 and 2023. A decline in vegetation cover coincided with increasing salinity, showing an inverse relationship between these factors. Additionally, the results highlight the complex interplay among these variables demonstrating that soil salinity levels are significantly impacted by climate change indicators, with a negative correlation between precipitation and salinity (r = −0.85, p < 0.001). Recognizing the interconnections between soil salinity, LULC changes, and climate variables is essential for developing comprehensive strategies, such as targeted irrigation practices and land suitability assessments. Earth observation and remote sensing play a critical role in enabling more sustainable and effective soil management in response to both human activities and climate-induced changes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Remote Sensing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flowchart of the overall methodology.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>A map of the study area and field sample point distribution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Average monthly precipitation and temperature recorded between 2000 and 2023 with linear trend lines for temperature (in red) and rainfall (in blue). (Source: Regional Commissary for Agriculture Development of Zaghouan, 2023).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Method of collecting a composite soil sample from five subsamples (<b>a</b>), and storing it in a plastic bag with an identification number (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Soil preparation and analysis in the laboratory.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Flowchart of the Methodology for Soil Salinity Mapping and Prediction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>LULC change dynamics between 2000 and 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Five soil SIs maps obtained from Landsat-8 OLI using linear regression.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Correlation between SI values and observed EC values using SIs derived from Landsat 8 bands for the year 2021: (<b>a</b>) Linear regression model using SI-1; (<b>b</b>) Linear regression model using SI-2; (<b>c</b>) Linear regression model using SI-3; (<b>d</b>) Linear regression model using SI-4; and (<b>e</b>) Linear regression model using SI-5.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Maps of spatiotemporal variability of soil salinity levels observed for the years 2000, 2004, 2008, 2012, 2016, 2020, and 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Long-term trends in Salt-affected soils, Vegetation, and Bare land areas.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Relationship between areas affected by soil salinity and average annual precipitation in mm per year between 2000 and 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Scatterplot between areas affected by soil salinity and precipitation over the study area between 2000 and 2023 (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ˂ 0.05).</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 4251 KiB  
Article
Exploring the Behavior of the High-Andean Wetlands in the Semi-Arid Zone of Chile: The Influence of Precipitation and Temperature Variability on Vegetation Cover and Water Quality
by Denisse Duhalde, Javiera Cortés, José-Luis Arumí, Jan Boll and Ricardo Oyarzún
Water 2024, 16(24), 3682; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16243682 (registering DOI) - 20 Dec 2024
Abstract
In recent decades, global ecosystems have increasingly faced impacts from heightened precipitation variability. Specifically, water availability is an essential factor in wetland dynamics and has ecological importance in the high-Andean wetlands in both mountains and downstream ecosystems, particularly in semi-arid regions. This study [...] Read more.
In recent decades, global ecosystems have increasingly faced impacts from heightened precipitation variability. Specifically, water availability is an essential factor in wetland dynamics and has ecological importance in the high-Andean wetlands in both mountains and downstream ecosystems, particularly in semi-arid regions. This study focused on a chain of twelve high-Andean wetlands within the “Estero Derecho” nature sanctuary at the headwaters of the Elqui River in north-central Chile. The analysis of the spatiotemporal dynamics of precipitation and vegetation cover used the Landsat 5 and 8 Satellite imagery-derived normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and normalized difference moisture index (NDMI) time series during the austral summer (December–March). We employed time series, boxplots, and least-squares regression analyses to explore vegetation cover behavior in relation to precipitation, water quality, and vegetation indices. Precipitation had a marked influence on vegetation behavior, particularly during the Chilean “megadrought” phenomenon. For both the NDVI and NDMI indices and precipitation, negative trends in the time series were observed, along with a highly significant correlation with a one-year lag between both indices and precipitation. The analysis of the individual wetlands showed different vegetation cover behaviors, which were attributable to the altitude, terrain slope, and additional water inputs from streams that have also given rise to alluvial fans that exert a shaping influence on the wetlands. In addition, significant correlations between both indices and water quality parameters (CE, Cl, Mg, Na, and Fe) were identified. The findings of this study can be incorporated into the Sanctuary’s management plan and concretely assist communities involved with wetland conservation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study area: (<b>a</b>) location of Claro River basin, (<b>b</b>) Claro River basin and chain of wetlands—Estero Derecho Nature Sanctuary, and (<b>c</b>) interaction of alluvial fans with wetlands (W1–W10).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>An analytical framework of the study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The temporal variations in vegetation cover in the chain of wetlands: NDVI and NDMI time series (summer—annual average) and meteorological variables: (<b>a</b>) annual precipitation (1986–2019): Estero Derecho station (ED) and (2020–2022): La Laguna station (LL), used as a reference in the absence of data from the station in the basin in which the wetlands are located) and (<b>b</b>) annual average temperature (1986–2019): Estero Derecho station (ED).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The temporal variability in the vegetation cover of the chain of wetlands according to the classification of the indices: (<b>a</b>) NDVI and (<b>b</b>) NDMI.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>NDVI and NDMI maps (18 January 1988: highest index values; 20 March 2022: lowest index values).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Vegetation cover behavior in the study area disaggregated by wetland, generated based on the median index of each image: (<b>a</b>) NDVI and (<b>b</b>) NDMI.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Bubble plot showing relationship between vegetation indices (NDVI and NDMI) and wetland characteristics: (<b>a</b>) altitude vs. NDVI area as bubble size; (<b>b</b>) altitude vs. NDMI area as bubble size; (<b>c</b>) slope vs. NDVI area as bubble size; and (<b>d</b>) slope vs. NDMI area as bubble size.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Water quality parameters at Claro River Station: (<b>a</b>) ion and iron concentrations, and (<b>b</b>) electrical conductivity.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 4146 KiB  
Article
Prospects for Drought Detection and Monitoring Using Long-Term Vegetation Indices Series from Satellite Data in Kazakhstan
by Irina Vitkovskaya, Madina Batyrbayeva, Nurmaganbet Berdigulov and Damira Mombekova
Land 2024, 13(12), 2225; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13122225 - 19 Dec 2024
Abstract
The rainfed cereal growing regions of Northern Kazakhstan experience significant yield fluctuations due to dependence on weather conditions. Early detection and monitoring of droughts is crucial for effective mitigation strategies in this region. This study emphasises the following objectives: (1) description of the [...] Read more.
The rainfed cereal growing regions of Northern Kazakhstan experience significant yield fluctuations due to dependence on weather conditions. Early detection and monitoring of droughts is crucial for effective mitigation strategies in this region. This study emphasises the following objectives: (1) description of the current vegetation condition with a possible separation of short-term weather effects and (2) analysing trends of changes with their directionality and quantification. Terra MODIS satellite images from 2000 to 2023 are used. Differential indices—Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Vegetation Condition Index (VCI)—are used to determine the characteristics of each current season. A key component is the comparison of the current NDVI values with historical maximum, minimum, and average values to identify early indicators of drought. NDVI deviations from multiyear norms and VCI values below 0.3 visually reflect changing vegetation conditions influenced by seasonal weather patterns. The results show that the algorithm effectively detects early signs of drought through observed deviations in NDVI values, showing a trend towards increasing drought frequency and intensity in Northern Kazakhstan. The algorithm was particularly effective in detecting severe drought seasons in advance, as was the case in June 2010 and May 2012, thus supporting early recognition of drought onset. The Integrated Vegetation Index (IVI) and Integrated Vegetation Condition Index (IVCI) time series are used for integrated multiyear assessments, in analysing temporal changes in vegetation cover, determining trends in these changes, and ranking the weather conditions of each growing season in the multiyear series. Areas with high probability of drought based on low IVCI values are mapped. The present study emphasises the value of remote sensing as a tool for drought monitoring, offering timely and spatially detailed information on vulnerable areas. This approach provides critical information for agricultural planning, environmental management and policy making, especially in arid and semi-arid regions. The study emphasises the importance of multiyear data series for accurate drought forecasting and suggests that this methodology can be adapted to other drought-sensitive regions. Emphasising the socio-economic benefits, this study suggests that the early detection of drought using satellite data can reduce material losses and facilitate targeted responses. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Technological scheme for the formation of a series of vegetation indices.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Changes in the HTI coefficient and the IVCI (2000–2023).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Changes in the IVCI and average grain yield (2000–2023).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>NDVI distributions for different weather years, Akmola region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>NDVI distributions in different weather conditions of vegetation seasons (Akkol district, Akmola region).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Dynamics of the changes in the areas of zones of different productivity determined by IVInorm values for 2000–2023. (<b>A</b>) Location of zones of different productivity determined by IVInorm values. (<b>B</b>) Areas of zones with IVInorm values 0–0.1 and 0.1–0.2. (<b>C</b>) Areas of zones with IVInorm values 0.2–0.3. (<b>D</b>) Areas of zones with IVInorm values 0.3–0.4 and 0.4–1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Changes in the IVCI for the northern regions of Kazakhstan.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Frequency of droughts on the territory of Kazakhstan, calculated from remote sensing data for April–September in 2000–2023.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 7833 KiB  
Article
Research on the Inversion of Key Growth Parameters of Rice Based on Multisource Remote Sensing Data and Deep Learning
by Jian Li, Jian Lu, Hongkun Fu, Wenlong Zou, Weijian Zhang, Weilin Yu and Yuxuan Feng
Agriculture 2024, 14(12), 2326; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14122326 - 19 Dec 2024
Viewed by 109
Abstract
This study accurately inverts key growth parameters of rice, including Leaf Area Index (LAI), chlorophyll content (SPAD) value, and height, by integrating multisource remote sensing data (including MODIS and ERA5 imagery) and deep learning models. Dehui City in Jilin Province, China, was selected [...] Read more.
This study accurately inverts key growth parameters of rice, including Leaf Area Index (LAI), chlorophyll content (SPAD) value, and height, by integrating multisource remote sensing data (including MODIS and ERA5 imagery) and deep learning models. Dehui City in Jilin Province, China, was selected as the case study area, where multidimensional data including vegetation indices, ecological function parameters, and environmental variables were collected, covering seven key growth stages of rice. Data analysis and parameter prediction were conducted using a variety of machine learning and deep learning models including Partial Least Squares (PLSs), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and Long Short-Term Memory Networks (LSTM), among which the LSTM model demonstrated superior performance, particularly at multiple critical time points. The results show that the LSTM performed best in inverting the three parameters, with the LAI inversion accuracy on 21 August reaching a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.72, root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.34, and mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.27. The SPAD inversion accuracy on the same date achieved an R2 of 0.69, RMSE of 1.45, and MAE of 1.16. The height inversion accuracy on 25 July reached an R2 of 0.74, RMSE of 2.30, and MAE of 2.08. This study not only verifies the effectiveness of combining multisource data and advanced algorithms but also provides a scientific basis for the precision management and decision-making of rice cultivation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Digital Agriculture)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Map of the study area of Dehui City, Jilin Province, showing rice distribution and sampling points.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Integrated framework for inverting key growth parameters of rice using multisource data and machine learning/deep learning models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Correlation between selected key variables and field-measured LAI on 6 July. Note: one asterisk (*), double asterisk (**), and threefold asterisks (***) indicate a correlation coefficient (r) with statistically significance levels of <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value &lt; 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Standardized SHAP values for features influencing LAI, SPAD, and height predictions across different dates.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparison of R<sup>2</sup>, RMSE, and MAE for LAI, SPAD, and height predictions using different variable combinations across three growth stages. (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) represent the R<sup>2</sup> values for different variable combinations on 6 July, 25 July, and 21 August, respectively. (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) represent the RMSE for different variable combinations on 6 July, 25 July, and 21 August, respectively. (<b>g</b>–<b>i</b>) represent the MAE for different variable combinations on 6 July, 25 July, and 21 August, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Spatial inversion maps of LAI, SPAD, and height across three key growth stages (6 July, 25 July, and 21 August). (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) are the spatial inversion maps of LAI at the three key growth stages. (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) are the spatial inversion maps of SPAD at the three key growth stages. (<b>g</b>–<b>i</b>) are the spatial inversion maps of height at the three key growth stages.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Accuracy evaluation of predicted and measured LAI, SPAD, and height using the LSTM model at three key growth stages. (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) are accuracy evaluation of LAI for three periods. (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) are accuracy evaluation of SPAD for three periods. (<b>g</b>–<b>i</b>) are accuracy evaluation of Height for three periods.</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 9018 KiB  
Article
Predicting Forest Evapotranspiration Shifts Under Diverse Climate Change Scenarios by Leveraging the SEBAL Model Across Inner Mongolia
by Penghao Ji, Rong Su and Runhong Gao
Forests 2024, 15(12), 2234; https://doi.org/10.3390/f15122234 - 19 Dec 2024
Viewed by 168
Abstract
This study examines climate change impacts on evapotranspiration in Inner Mongolia, analyzing potential (PET) and actual (AET) evapotranspiration shifts across diverse land-use classes using the SEBAL model and SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 projections (2030–2050) relative to a 1985–2015 baseline. Our findings reveal substantial PET [...] Read more.
This study examines climate change impacts on evapotranspiration in Inner Mongolia, analyzing potential (PET) and actual (AET) evapotranspiration shifts across diverse land-use classes using the SEBAL model and SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 projections (2030–2050) relative to a 1985–2015 baseline. Our findings reveal substantial PET increases across all LULC types, with Non-Vegetated Lands consistently showing the highest absolute PET values across scenarios (931.19 mm under baseline, increasing to 975.65 mm under SSP5-8.5) due to limited vegetation cover and shading effects, while forests, croplands, and savannas exhibit the most pronounced relative increases under SSP5-8.5, driven by heightened atmospheric demand and vegetation-induced transpiration. Monthly analyses show pronounced PET increases, particularly in the warmer months (June–August), with projected SSP5-8.5 PET levels reaching peaks of over 500 mm, indicating significant future water demand. AET increases are largest in densely vegetated classes, such as forests (+242.41 mm for Evergreen Needleleaf Forests under SSP5-8.5), while croplands and grasslands exhibit more moderate gains (+249.59 mm and +167.75 mm, respectively). The widening PET-AET gap highlights a growing vulnerability to moisture deficits, particularly in croplands and grasslands. Forested areas, while resilient, face rising water demands, necessitating conservation measures, whereas croplands and grasslands in low-precipitation areas risk soil moisture deficits and productivity declines due to limited adaptive capacity. Non-Vegetated Lands and built-up areas exhibit minimal AET responses (+16.37 mm for Non-Vegetated Lands under SSP5-8.5), emphasizing their limited water cycling contributions despite high PET. This research enhances the understanding of climate-induced changes in water demands across semi-arid regions, providing critical insights into effective and region-specific water resource management strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mapping and Modeling Forests Using Geospatial Technologies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the study area and the dominant land use/cover classes (Watershed IDs represent 1: Hailar District; 2: Holingol City; 3: Arong Banner; 4: Genhe City; 5: Molidawa Daur Autonomous Banner; 6: Chenbarhu Banner; 7: Xinbarhu Left Banner; 8: Keshiketeng Banner; 9: Linxi County; 10: Wengniute Banner; 11: Aru Horqin Banner; 12: Balin Right Banner; 13: Balin Left Banner; 14: Abaga Banner; 15: Eastern Ujumqin Banner; 16: Western Ujumqin Banner; 17: Xilinhot City; 18: Arxan City; 19: Horqin Right Front Banner; 20: Horqin Right Middle Banner; 21: Tuquan County; 22: Ulanhot City; 23: Zhalaite Banner; 24: Ergun City; 25: Yakeshi City; 26: Ewenki Autonomous Banner; 27: Zhalantun City; 28: Zhalut Banner; 29: Oroqen Autonomous Banner).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Scatter plots of retrieved PET from the TerraClimate dataset versus simulated PET (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>E</mi> <mi>T</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>L</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>) for (<b>a</b>) March, (<b>b</b>) April, (<b>c</b>) May, (<b>d</b>) June, (<b>e</b>) July, (<b>f</b>) August, (<b>g</b>) September, (<b>h</b>) October, and (<b>i</b>) November.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Spatial variations in the average annual potential evapotranspiration under baseline and future climate scenarios.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Spatial variations in the average annual actual evapotranspiration under baseline and future climate scenarios.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Spatial distribution of monthly <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>E</mi> <mi>T</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>F</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> changes: (<b>a</b>) March, (<b>b</b>) April, (<b>c</b>) May, (<b>d</b>) June, (<b>e</b>) July, (<b>f</b>) August, (<b>g</b>) September, (<b>h</b>) October, and (<b>i</b>) November under current condition.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Changes in potential and actual evapotranspiration in each month relative to the baseline period under future climate scenarios.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Potential evapotranspiration variability across detailed land uses under current and future climate scenarios.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Actual evapotranspiration variability across detailed land uses under current and future climate scenarios.</p>
Full article ">
28 pages, 16088 KiB  
Article
A Hierarchical Machine Learning-Based Strategy for Mapping Grassland in Manitoba’s Diverse Ecoregions
by Mirmajid Mousavi, James Kobina Mensah Biney, Barbara Kishchuk, Ali Youssef, Marcos R. C. Cordeiro, Glenn Friesen, Douglas Cattani, Mustapha Namous and Nasem Badreldin
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(24), 4730; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16244730 - 18 Dec 2024
Viewed by 276
Abstract
Accurate and reliable knowledge about grassland distribution is essential for farmers, stakeholders, and government to effectively manage grassland resources from agro-economical and ecological perspectives. This study developed a novel pixel-based grassland classification approach using three supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms, which were assessed [...] Read more.
Accurate and reliable knowledge about grassland distribution is essential for farmers, stakeholders, and government to effectively manage grassland resources from agro-economical and ecological perspectives. This study developed a novel pixel-based grassland classification approach using three supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms, which were assessed in the province of Manitoba, Canada. The grassland classification process involved three stages: (1) to distinguish between vegetation and non-vegetation covers, (2) to differentiate grassland from non-grassland landscapes, and (3) to identify three specific grassland classes (tame, native, and mixed grasses). Initially, this study investigated different satellite data, such as Sentinel-1 (S1), Sentinel-2 (S2), and Landsat 8 and 9, individually and combined, using the random forest (RF) method, with the best performance at the first two steps achieved using a combination of S1 and S2. The combination was then utilized to conduct the first two steps of classification using support vector machine (SVM) and gradient tree boosting (GTB). In step 3, after filtering out non-grassland pixels, the performance of RF, SVM, and GTB classifiers was evaluated with combined S1 and S2 data to distinguish different grassland types. Eighty-nine multitemporal raster-based variables, including spectral bands, SAR backscatters, and digital elevation models (DEM), were input for ML models. RF had the highest classification accuracy at 69.96% overall accuracy (OA) and a Kappa value of 0.55. After feature selection, the variables were reduced to 61, increasing OA to 72.62% with a Kappa value of 0.58. GTB ranked second, with its OA and Kappa values improving from 67.69% and 0.50 to 72.18% and 0.58 after feature selection. The impact of raster data quality on grassland classification accuracy was assessed through multisensor image fusion. Grassland classification using the Hue, Saturation, and Value (HSV) fused images showed higher OA (59.18%) and Kappa values (0.36) than the Brovey Transform (BT) and non-fused images. Finally, a web map was created to show grassland results within the Soil Landscapes of Canada (SLC) polygons, relating soil landscapes to grassland distribution and providing valuable information for decision-makers and researchers. Future work may include extending the current methodology by considering other influential variables, like meteorological parameters or soil properties, to create a comprehensive grassland inventory across the whole Prairie ecozone of Canada. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geographical location of study area. Manitoba’s PE, with different ecoregions, is located in the province of Manitoba, Canada.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The spatial distribution of the ground-truthing sampling for all LULC classes included in the classification of Manitoba’s PE grasslands.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>General overview of the major steps and workflow of the novel strategy for grassland classification, which is developed to improve ecological monitoring using multisource RS data and advanced ML techniques. This workflow integrates data from the S1, S2, L8, and L9 satellites. It involves major stages of image preprocessing, multitemporal composition, image fusion using HSV and BT, and advanced ML classifiers, including RF, SVM, and GTB. The classification is performed in three steps to achieve fine-scale identification of native, tame, and mixed grasses, starting from basic vegetation classification (Step 1) to detailed grassland class differentiation (Step 3); # represents the generated grassland map from each ML process. Ancillary field data, topographic features, and LULC information were incorporated as inputs to generate the final grassland maps for web-based visualization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Atmospheric effects on RS imagery demonstrate the influence of atmospheric conditions on the quality of RS data, specifically how clouds and shadows can occlude pixels and impact the accuracy of the reflected signal received by MSS sensors. (<b>a</b>) The pixel occluded by a shadow shows a scenario where a shadow, cast by an obstacle like a cloud, causes the pixel to be occluded, leading to distorted signals received by the sensor. (<b>b</b>) The pixel occluded by a cloud shows a situation where a cloud directly occludes the pixel, resulting in inaccurate data due to the cloud’s interference with the reflected sunlight that reaches the sensor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The steps of HSV method modified from Al-Wassai et al. [<a href="#B85-remotesensing-16-04730" class="html-bibr">85</a>]. After transforming the RGB image to HSV format, its V channel was replaced with the HR channel, which was then converted back to RGB mode.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparison of step 2 grassland classification results using different ML models: (<b>a</b>) RF, (<b>b</b>) SVM, and (<b>c</b>) GTB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Classification accuracy varies with different input features ranked based on ANOVA for the RF, SVM, and GTB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Sampled areas before and after image fusion for image quality improvement: (<b>a</b>) Landsat 30 m, (<b>b</b>) HSV fused image, and (<b>c</b>) BT fused image.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Scatter plots of fused and non-fused bands using BT and HSV approaches. Except for band 2 (B2), HSV had a higher r-squared. Around 1900 points were selected to build the scatter plots, and the color bar represents the point density, speeded from low density (Blue) to high density (Red).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The detailed grassland classification of Manitoba’s PE using RF supervised ML classification model and S1 + S2 data combination.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Distribution of mixed, tamed, and native grasslands across three ecoregions, highlighting the areas covered by each grassland class. The percentage listed for each ecoregion shows its proportion of the total grassland area, with Southwest Manitoba Uplands at 2.42%, Lake Manitoba Plain at 41.83%, and Aspen Parkland at 55.75%. The relative dominance of each grassland type across the Aspen Parkland, Lake Manitoba Plain, and Southwest Manitoba Uplands illustrates regional differences in land use and ecological composition.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>The list of all features with their scores. The numbers following spectral bands, VIs and backscatter variables indicate multiple composite images created during the growing season. Red points show the features that were excluded from classification models to achieve their highest OA and Kappa coefficient; (<b>a</b>) ANOVA F-Value of RF; (<b>b</b>) ANOVA F-Value of SVM; and (<b>c</b>) ANOVA F-Value of GTB.</p>
Full article ">Figure A2
<p>The classification maps of pixel-level fusion with RF approach using (<b>a</b>) Multispectral image, (<b>b</b>) HSV fused image, and (<b>c</b>) BT fused image.</p>
Full article ">Figure A3
<p>Out-of-bag (OOB) error for different numbers of trees and number of variables per split was calculated. Different numbers of variables per split tested are the square root of the total number of variables (SQRT), the total number of variables (ALL), and the natural logarithm of the total number of variables (Ln).</p>
Full article ">Figure A4
<p>(<b>a</b>) OA of classification for different kernel types in the SVM Model. (<b>b</b>) Grid search to find the best value for the Cost/Regularization parameter for Linear kernel in SVM.</p>
Full article ">Figure A5
<p>The effect of the number of trees on OA in GTB classification.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 5690 KiB  
Article
Assessment of Green Space Dynamics Under Urban Expansion of Senegalese Cities: The Case of Dakar
by Mariama Cissé, Oluwole Morenikeji, Elke Mertens, Awa Niang Fall and Appollonia Aimiosino Okhimamhe
Urban Sci. 2024, 8(4), 258; https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci8040258 - 18 Dec 2024
Viewed by 371
Abstract
Senegalese cities have experienced rapid urbanisation, leading to profound landscape changes. Dakar, one of Senegalese’s fastest-growing cities, is experiencing rapid urban expansion, significantly reducing green spaces. These green spaces, essential for urban sustainability and resilience, have become increasingly scarce, affecting the city’s environment [...] Read more.
Senegalese cities have experienced rapid urbanisation, leading to profound landscape changes. Dakar, one of Senegalese’s fastest-growing cities, is experiencing rapid urban expansion, significantly reducing green spaces. These green spaces, essential for urban sustainability and resilience, have become increasingly scarce, affecting the city’s environment and the quality of life for its residents. This study aims to assess the spatiotemporal changes in Dakar’s green spaces from 1990 to 2022. Using satellite imagery, this study produces land use maps to quantify green space coverage over the years. The results show a gradual decline in green spaces in Dakar between 1990 and 2022. In 1990, green spaces covered an estimated 13.36% of Dakar’s area, which decreased significantly to 9.54% by 2022. In contrast, other land uses, such as built-up areas, increased significantly over this period, rising from 19.23% in 1990 to 39.34% in 2022. Moreover, built-up areas are not the sole contributor to the reduction of green spaces in Dakar. The study revealed that, between 1990 and 2022, 5.49% of green spaces were converted into bare soil due to excessive tree cutting. This pattern highlights the growing challenge of green space availability as built-up areas expand rapidly, particularly when growth is unplanned. This study underscores the importance of sustainable urban planning that integrates the protection and conservation of Dakar’s vegetation to preserve vital ecosystem services. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location map of the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flowchart of processing Landsat data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Land cover classes of Dakar from 1990 (<b>A</b>) and 2002 (<b>B</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Land cover classes of Dakar from 2012 (<b>A</b>) and 2022 (<b>B</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Percentage of land use types in the city of Dakar from 1990 to 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Land use/cover change in Dakar from 1990 to 2002 (<b>A</b>), from 2002 to 2012 (<b>B</b>) and from 2012 to 2022 (<b>C</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 1
<p>Photos illustrating the fragmentation of green spaces in Dakar: (<b>A</b>) motorway crossing the Mbao Classified Forest and (<b>B</b>) buildings located in Hann Forest and Zoological Park.</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 2965 KiB  
Article
Assessment of Water and Soil Contamination and Land Cover Changes in the Spring Creek Bayou Watershed in Houston, Texas
by Felica R. Davis and Maruthi Sridhar Balaji Bhaskar
Environments 2024, 11(12), 291; https://doi.org/10.3390/environments11120291 - 17 Dec 2024
Viewed by 225
Abstract
Stormwater runoff and nutrient pollution are significant sources of water contamination that continue to grow in rural and suburban watersheds. The goal of this research is to analyze and evaluate the impact of urbanization and industrialization on suburban watersheds in southeast Texas. The [...] Read more.
Stormwater runoff and nutrient pollution are significant sources of water contamination that continue to grow in rural and suburban watersheds. The goal of this research is to analyze and evaluate the impact of urbanization and industrialization on suburban watersheds in southeast Texas. The objectives are to: (1) determine nutrient and heavy metal concentrations in soil and water samples along Spring Creek Bayou (SC), (2) analyze land cover changes over the last 30 years and (3) assess and evaluate socio-economic data within the watershed. The soil and water samples were collected from upstream, midstream and downstream locations in triplicate during the spring and fall seasons along the bayou. The samples were analyzed to determine chemical concentrations and Landsat 5, and eight imageries were used to derive thematic land cover maps. The soil and water chemical concentrations were interpolated to spatial maps for distribution analysis. The chemical analysis of water samples collected from SC Bayou revealed that N and P concentrations were at elevated levels that can pose a threat to water quality and aquatic organisms. Heavy metal concentrations of Zn were at elevated levels in water samples from the SC Bayou watershed. Land cover change patterns showed that high-vegetation surfaces decreased while low-vegetation surfaces increased slightly over the past three decades. The watershed experienced an increase in total population from 129,629 residents in 1990 to 389,977 residents in 2020. This research is important in improving our understanding on the impact of natural and human activities on suburban watersheds in the Greater Houston metropolitan region. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Monitoring of Contaminated Water and Soil)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The Spring Creek Bayou watershed along with municipal solid waste sites, wastewater outfalls and floodplain. Note: MSW = Municipal Solid Waste.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Spatial distribution of P and N and in water (μg L<sup>−1</sup>) and soil (mg kg<sup>−1</sup>) samples in Spring Creek Bayou Watershed (SBW). MSW = Municipal Solid Waste Facilities.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Land cover map of Spring Creek Bayou watershed for 1984, 1994, 2004, 2014 and 2020, and land cover change from 1984 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Population density, race and ethnicity composition and population income distribution in Sims Bayou watershed (SBW) for census years of 1990 and 2020.</p>
Full article ">
30 pages, 9613 KiB  
Article
Mapping Soil Properties in Tropical Rainforest Regions Using Integrated UAV-Based Hyperspectral Images and LiDAR Points
by Yiqing Chen, Tiezhu Shi, Qipei Li, Chao Yang, Zhensheng Wang, Zongzhu Chen and Xiaoyan Pan
Forests 2024, 15(12), 2222; https://doi.org/10.3390/f15122222 - 17 Dec 2024
Viewed by 244
Abstract
For tropical rainforest regions with dense vegetation cover, the development of effective large-scale soil mapping methods is crucial to improve soil management practices to replace the time-consuming and laborious conventional approaches. While machine learning (ML) algorithms demonstrate superior predictability of soil properties over [...] Read more.
For tropical rainforest regions with dense vegetation cover, the development of effective large-scale soil mapping methods is crucial to improve soil management practices to replace the time-consuming and laborious conventional approaches. While machine learning (ML) algorithms demonstrate superior predictability of soil properties over linear models, their practical and automated application for predicting soil properties using remote sensing data requires further assessment. Therefore, this study aims to integrate Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs)-based hyperspectral images and Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) points to predict the soil properties indirectly in two tropical rainforest mountains (Diaoluo and Limu) in Hainan Province, China. A total of 175 features, including texture features, vegetation indices, and forest parameters, were extracted from two study sites. Six ML models, Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR), Random Forest (RF), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Gradient Boosting Decision Trees (GBDT), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), were constructed to predict soil properties, including soil acidity (pH), total nitrogen (TN), soil organic carbon (SOC), and total phosphorus (TP). To enhance model performance, a Bayesian optimization algorithm (BOA) was introduced to obtain optimal model hyperparameters. The results showed that compared with the default parameter tuning method, BOA always improved models’ performances in predicting soil properties, achieving average R2 improvements of 202.93%, 121.48%, 8.90%, and 38.41% for soil pH, SOC, TN, and TP, respectively. In general, BOA effectively determined the complex interactions between hyperparameters and prediction features, leading to an improved model performance of ML methods compared to default parameter tuning models. The GBDT model generally outperformed other ML methods in predicting the soil pH and TN, while the XGBoost model achieved the highest prediction accuracy for SOC and TP. The fusion of hyperspectral images and LiDAR data resulted in better prediction of soil properties compared to using each single data source. The models utilizing the integration of features derived from hyperspectral images and LiDAR data outperformed those relying on one single data source. In summary, this study highlights the promising combination of UAV-based hyperspectral images with LiDAR data points to advance digital soil property mapping in forested areas, achieving large-scale soil management and monitoring. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Forest Inventory, Modeling and Remote Sensing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Workflow of the soil property mapping method in tropical rainforest regions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Geographic location of Hainan Province, China; spatial distribution of soil samples in (<b>b</b>) Diaoluo, and (<b>c</b>) Limu mountain.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Top and side 3D view of LiDAR point cloud of (<b>a</b>) Diaoluo and (<b>b</b>) Limu mountains.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Comparison of soil properties between samples from Diaoluo and Limu mountains: (<b>a</b>) pH; (<b>b</b>) soil organic carbon (SOC); (<b>c</b>) total nitrogen (TN); and (<b>d</b>) total phosphorus (TP). Dashed lines represent the mean value.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4 Cont.
<p>Comparison of soil properties between samples from Diaoluo and Limu mountains: (<b>a</b>) pH; (<b>b</b>) soil organic carbon (SOC); (<b>c</b>) total nitrogen (TN); and (<b>d</b>) total phosphorus (TP). Dashed lines represent the mean value.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Importance ranking of the 15 selected features for predicting the (<b>a</b>) pH, (<b>b</b>) soil organic carbon (SOC), (<b>c</b>) total nitrogen (TN), and (<b>d</b>) total phosphorus (TP).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Scatter plots of the measured values against soil property levels predicted by the optimal models: (<b>a</b>) pH predicted by the GBDT model; (<b>b</b>) soil organic carbon (SOC) predicted by the XGBoost model; (<b>c</b>) total nitrogen (TN) predicted by the GBDT model; (<b>d</b>) total phosphorus (TP) predicted by the XGBoost model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Spatial distributions of the soil properties, including pH, soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP), in (<b>a</b>) Diaoluo and (<b>b</b>) Limu mountains.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7 Cont.
<p>Spatial distributions of the soil properties, including pH, soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP), in (<b>a</b>) Diaoluo and (<b>b</b>) Limu mountains.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 2234 KiB  
Article
Spatial–Temporal Changes and Driving Mechanisms of Ecological Environmental Quality in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau, China
by Zhan Shen and Jian Gong
Land 2024, 13(12), 2203; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13122203 - 16 Dec 2024
Viewed by 396
Abstract
This study examines the evolution of eco-environmental quality and its driving forces in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, with a particular focus on the Qinghai Lake region (QLR). By employing principal component analysis (PCA) on nearly 20 years of remote sensing data, we reveal the [...] Read more.
This study examines the evolution of eco-environmental quality and its driving forces in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, with a particular focus on the Qinghai Lake region (QLR). By employing principal component analysis (PCA) on nearly 20 years of remote sensing data, we reveal the dynamic characteristics of ecological quality in this sensitive area. The results indicate that the ecological quality of the QLR has exhibited significant fluctuations over the past two decades, influenced by multiple factors such as climate change, human activities, and policy adjustments. Specifically, the fluctuations in ecological quality are closely associated with key ecological indicators, including the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Land Surface Temperature (LST), Wetness Index (WET), and Normalized Differential Bare Soil Index (NDBSI). Vegetation cover and moderate humidity have substantial positive effects on ecological quality, while high temperatures and dry soil conditions exert negative impacts. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study area location map.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>PC1 principal component contribution degree.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Characteristic value contribution degree of four ecological elements.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Trend map of ecological quality ratio in Qinghai Lake region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Spatial distribution map of ecological quality change in Qinghai Lake region.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 9580 KiB  
Technical Note
Detection of the Contribution of Vegetation Change to Global Net Primary Productivity: A Satellite Perspective
by Xiaoqing Hu, Huihui Feng, Yingying Tang, Shu Wang, Shihan Wang, Wei Wang and Jixian Huang
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(24), 4692; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16244692 - 16 Dec 2024
Viewed by 324
Abstract
Exploring NPP changes and their corresponding drivers is significant for the achievement of sustainable ecosystem management and in addressing climate change. This study aimed to explore the spatiotemporal variation in NPP and analyze the effects of vegetation and climate change on the global [...] Read more.
Exploring NPP changes and their corresponding drivers is significant for the achievement of sustainable ecosystem management and in addressing climate change. This study aimed to explore the spatiotemporal variation in NPP and analyze the effects of vegetation and climate change on the global NPP from 2003 to 2020. Methodologically, the Theil–Sen and Mann–Kendall methods were used to study the spatiotemporal characteristics of global NPP change. Moreover, a ridge regression model was built by selecting the vegetation indicators of the leaf area index (LAI) and fraction vegetation coverage (FVC) and the climate factors of CO2, shortwave downward solar radiation (Rsd), precipitation (P), and temperature (T). Then, the relative contributions of each factor were evaluated. The results showed that, over the previous two decades, the global mean NPP reached 503.43 g C m−2 yr−1, with a fluctuating upward trend of 1.52 g C m−2 yr−1. The regions with a significant increase in NPP (9.22 g C m−2 yr−1) were mainly located in Central Africa, while the regions with decreasing NPP (−3.21 g C m−2 yr−1) were primarily in the Amazon Rainforest in northern South America. Additionally, CO2, the LAI, and the FVC exhibited positive contributions to the NPP trend, with the predominant factors being CO2 (relative contribution of 32.22%) and the LAI (relative contribution of 21.96%). In contrast, the contributions of Rsd and precipitation were relatively low (<10%). In addition, the contributions varied at different land cover and climate zone scales. The CO2, LAI, FVC, and temperature were the predominant factors affecting NPP across the vegetation types. At the scale of climate zones, CO2 was the predominant factor influencing changes in vegetation NPP. As the climate gradually transitioned towards temperate and cold regions, the contribution of the LAI to NPP increased. The findings of this study help to clarify the effects of vegetation and climate change on the ecosystem, providing theoretical support for ecological environmental protection and other related initiatives. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Remote Sensing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Spatial distribution of average global NPP from 2003 to 2020 (g C m<sup>−2</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Response characteristics of NPP to various vegetation types and climate zones.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The global NPP’s interannual variation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Spatial distribution of global NPP trends (“+” indicates significance at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, with unit of g C m<sup>−2</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>) and the percentage of areas showing increasing or decreasing trends.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Year-to-year comparison of NPP simulations and observations during 2003 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>A scatterplot of the observed and simulated NPP values from 2003 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The mean absolute values of the relative contributions of the driving factors to NPP.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The percentages of areas with positive and negative contributions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The distribution characteristics of each factor’s relative contribution to NPP in spatial terms: (<b>a</b>) LAI; (<b>b</b>) FVC; (<b>c</b>) CO<sub>2</sub>; (<b>d</b>) R<sub>sd</sub>; (<b>e</b>) P; (<b>f</b>) T.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The mean absolute values of the relative contributions of the driving factors to NPP variation across different vegetation types.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The mean absolute values of the relative contributions of the driving factors to NPP variation in different climatic zones.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop