[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (27)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = slab rollback

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
39 pages, 71974 KiB  
Article
Geology, Petrology and Geochronology of the Late Cretaceous Klaza Epithermal Deposit: A Window into the Petrogenesis of an Emerging Porphyry Belt in the Dawson Range, Yukon, Canada
by Well-Shen Lee, Daniel J. Kontak, Patrick J. Sack, James L. Crowley and Robert A. Creaser
Minerals 2025, 15(1), 38; https://doi.org/10.3390/min15010038 - 31 Dec 2024
Viewed by 667
Abstract
Geologic understanding of the richly mineralized Dawson Range gold belt (DRGB) in the central Yukon, Canada is hindered by: (1) limited outcrop exposure due to thick soil cover; and (2) low resolution age-constraints despite a long history of porphyry Cu–Au–Mo deposit (PCD) exploration. [...] Read more.
Geologic understanding of the richly mineralized Dawson Range gold belt (DRGB) in the central Yukon, Canada is hindered by: (1) limited outcrop exposure due to thick soil cover; and (2) low resolution age-constraints despite a long history of porphyry Cu–Au–Mo deposit (PCD) exploration. Here, the well-preserved Klaza Au–Ag–Pb–Zn porphyry–epithermal deposit is used as a type-example of Late Cretaceous magmatic–hydrothermal mineralization to address the complex metallogeny of the DRGB. U–Pb zircon dating defines four magmatic pulses of Late Triassic to Late Cretaceous ages with the latter consisting of the Casino (80–72 Ma) and Prospector Mt. (72–65 Ma) suites. The Casino suite has five phases of intermediate-to-felsic calc-alkaline composition, correspond with older (77 Ma) porphyry mineralization, and displays evidence of magma mingling. The intermediate-to-mafic, slightly alkalic Prospector Mt. suite shows evidence of mingling with the youngest Casino suite phases, correlates with younger (71 Ma), intermediate-sulfidation epithermal and porphyry-type mineralization, and shoshonitic basalts of the Carmacks Group. Zircon trace element data suggest a common melt source for these suites; however, the younger suite records features (e.g., high La/Yb) that indicate a higher pressure melt source. The results from this study highlight the Prospector Mt. suite as a historically overlooked causative magma event linked to Au-rich PCDs in the DRGB and extends the temporal window of PCD prospectivity in this area. The transition from mid-Cretaceous Whitehorse suite magmas to Late Cretaceous Casino-Prospector Mt. suite magmas is proposed to reflect a transition from subduction to localized extension, which is becoming more recognized as a common characteristic of productive porphyry belts globally. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Regional- and local-scale geological maps of the study area. (<b>A</b>) Inset map showing the location of the Klaza deposit and the Dawson Range Gold Belt relative to cities in the Yukon. (<b>B</b>) Simplified geologic map of the southern Dawson Range redrawn and modified from Yukon Geological Survey [<a href="#B35-minerals-15-00038" class="html-bibr">35</a>]. The locations of the Mt. Nansen Gold Corridor (MNGC) and Freegold Mt. District (FGMD) are indicated. All mineral occurrences displayed in this map are either porphyry or epithermal systems. (<b>C</b>) Geologic map of the Mt. Nansen Gold Corridor modified from Sack et al. [<a href="#B36-minerals-15-00038" class="html-bibr">36</a>] and Lee et al. [<a href="#B37-minerals-15-00038" class="html-bibr">37</a>]. The locations of the Klaza deposit and past-producing Brown-McDade mine are indicated. A cross-section of (<b>A</b>,<b>A′</b>) matching the colour scheme of this map is provided. UTM Zone 08, Datum: NAD 83.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Polished (<b>left</b>) and stained (<b>right</b>; sodium cobaltinitrite) samples of important igneous rocks at Klaza. Note the unit name is provided on the left side of images. (<b>A</b>) Minto suite granodiorite with subhedral K-feldspar phenocrysts (surface sample). (<b>B</b>) Mt. Nansen Group andesite from adjacent to deposit area (surface sample). (<b>C</b>) Whitehorse suite (WS) hornblende-biotite granodiorite having a light propylitic overprint (Eastern BRX zone: KL-17-374; 75 m). (<b>D</b>) WS biotite-hornblende tonalite (KL-15-286; 93 m). (<b>E</b>) Casino suite (CS) monzogranite to granite (Kelly zone: KL-16-314; 117 m). (<b>F</b>) CS plagioclase(-biotite) phyric diorite (i3a phase). (<b>G</b>) CS hornblende diorite (Kelly zone: KL-16-314; 331 m). (<b>H</b>) CS plagioclase-quartz-biotite phyric granodiorite (Kelly zone: KL-16-314; 358 m). (<b>I</b>) Plagioclase-quartz(-biotite) phyric granodiorite (Kelly zone: KL-16-314; 453 m). (<b>J</b>) Prospector Mt. suite plagioclase phyric biotite diorite (Kl-14-193; 248 m). (<b>K</b>) Carmacks Group basalt (surface sample). (<b>L</b>) Timeline with crosscutting relationships among various intrusive phases and high- to low-temperature vein types at the Klaza deposit and Kelly prospect. Mineral abbreviations in accordance with Whitney and Evans [<a href="#B40-minerals-15-00038" class="html-bibr">40</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Images of drill core and polished thin sections (pts) in crossed nicols of various units in the Klaza deposit setting. (<b>A</b>) Gradational contact between i3a and i3b phases (Kelly zone: KL-16-314; 358.2 m depth). (<b>B</b>) Clast of i3a phase within i3b (Kelly zone: KL-16-314; 370.2 m depth). (<b>C</b>) Dike of i3a cutting i3b phase (Kelly zone: KL-16-314; 352.65 m depth). (<b>D</b>) Clast of i3b phase in the i3c phase (Kelly zone: KL-16-314; 358.8 m depth). (<b>E</b>) Pts image of embayed quartz grains in i4 phase dike. Note that the matrix is mostly sericite and biotite (surface sample). (<b>F</b>) Pts image of a relict sieve-textured plagioclase grain in a sericite-altered groundmass in i4 phase dike (Kelly zone: KL-16-314; 446.5 m). (<b>G</b>) Pts image of sieve-textured plagioclase grain intergrown with biotite and hornblende in i3b phase (Kelly zone: KL-16-314; 332.2m). (<b>H</b>) EDM-type vein overprinted by propylitic alteration with later fractures lined by pyrite and chalcopyrite (Kelly zone: KL-16-314; 442.3 m depth). (<b>I</b>) EDM-type vein cored by an A-type vein (Kelly zone: KL-16-314; 358 m depth). (<b>J</b>) A-type vein overprinted by phyllic alteration (Kelly zone: KL-16-314; 379.19 m depth). (<b>K</b>) B-type vein with pyrite overprinted by phyllic alteration (Kelly zone: KL-16-314; 114 m depth). (<b>L</b>) Quartz–molybdenite vein cut by epithermal-type pyrite and carbonate veins (Kelly zone: KL-16-314; 431 m depth). (<b>M</b>) D-type vein boarded by phyllic alteration (Central Klaza zone: KL-15-240; 146 m depth). (<b>N</b>) Tourmaline–quartz–muscovite–pyrite vein with associated phyllic alteration (Central Klaza zone: KL-12-133; 327.75 m depth). Mineral abbreviations in accordance with Whitney and Evans [<a href="#B40-minerals-15-00038" class="html-bibr">40</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Rock slabs and backscatter electron (BSE) images of rock type and veins at Klaza along with a schematic diagram summarizing the evolution of the setting. (<b>A</b>) Anhedral i4 dike clast within i5 dike (Kelly zone: KL-16-309; 395.66 m depth). (<b>B</b>) Stage 2b vein cutting i5 dike (Central Klaza zone: KL-11-12; 195.8 m depth). (<b>C</b>) Stage 2b and stage 3 vein at the contact between an i5 dike and i1 granodiorite (Central Klaza zone: KL-11-12; 176.5 m depth). (<b>D</b>) Prospector Mt. suite dike (i5) brecciated and cemented by Stage 2c (Western Klaza zone: KL-14-178; 96.5 m depth). (<b>E</b>) Stage 2a massive pyrite cut by Stage 2b cloudy quartz–pyrite–sphalerite–arsenopyrite vein and Stage 2c galena–sphalerite–tetrahedrite (Central BRX zone: KL-14-428; 57 m depth). (<b>F</b>) Stage 2a massive arsenopyrite and prismatic Stage 2a quartz (Western BRX zone: KL-17-398; 123 m depth). (<b>G</b>) Stage 2b banded arsenopyrite–pyrite–sphalerite–quartz vein with a centre-fill Stage 2c galena–sphalerite–tetrahedrite–quartz vein (Central Klaza zone: KL-14-193; 271.86 m depth). (<b>H</b>) Stage 3 rhodochrosite vein with sphalerite cutting Stage 2c galena–sphalerite–tetrahedrite–quartz (Western BRX zone: KL-17-398; 123.5 m depth). (<b>I</b>) BSE image of Stage 2c galena with tetrahedrite inclusions (Central Klaza zone: KL-11-12; 221.19 m). (<b>J</b>) SEM X-ray map of (<b>I</b>) showing the Ag-rich nature of tetrahedrite. (<b>K</b>) Bladed barite hosted in quartz-carbonate alongside banded ankerite veins from stage 3 (Central Klaza zone: KL-11-18; 181.90 m). (<b>L</b>) Colloform- and moss-textured quartz-carbonate vein from stage 3 (Central Klaza zone: KL-12-133; 148.65 m depth). (<b>M</b>) Fault gouge containing milled vein and wallrock material (Western BRX zone: KL-17-401; 82 m depth). (<b>N</b>) Silicified breccia in i1 granodiorite (Central Klaza zone: KL-12-133; 352.20 m depth). (<b>O</b>) A schematic diagram of the Klaza composite vein substages and their relationship to magmatic and high-T vein phases. Mineral abbreviations in accordance with Whitney and Evans [<a href="#B40-minerals-15-00038" class="html-bibr">40</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Summary of veins and alteration at the Klaza deposit setting. (<b>A</b>) Representative slab of unit i3b (i.e., a hornblende diorite) showing example of alteration types present in the vicinity of composite epithermal veins. (<b>B</b>) Close up view of porphyry-related propylitic (p-Pro) and epithermal vein-related propylitic (v-Pro) alteration. The boundary between these alteration types is defined by the alteration of biotite and amphibole to rutile and leucoxene. (<b>C</b>) Close up view of epithermal vein-related phyllic (v-Phy) and v-Pro alteration. (<b>D</b>) Schematic diagram depicting the transitional mineral stabilities of primary magmatic phases among the different alteration types. Mineral abbreviations in accordance with Whitney and Evans [<a href="#B40-minerals-15-00038" class="html-bibr">40</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparison of drillhole KL-12-114 (110 to 121.5 m depth) from the Klaza setting as seen in 2012 (<b>A</b>) versus in 2019 (<b>B</b>) to highlight the orange staining from the oxidation of the Fe-carbonate alteration. (<b>C</b>) Close-up view of the Fe-stained carbonate. (<b>D</b>,<b>E</b>) Comparison of carbonate colour in the same piece of core from 2012 (<b>D</b>) and 2019 (<b>E</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Summary of Ar–Ar age spectra for muscovite obtained from step-wise heating of pure mineral separates. Note that the grey denotes the steps used in the plateau age calculations. (<b>A</b>) KZ-1 (KL-12-133; 442 m). (<b>B</b>) KZWS17-03 (KL-15-240; 146 m). (<b>C</b>) KZWS17-56 (KL-12-133; 93 m depth).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Summary of results for CA-TIMS U–Pb zircon geochronology for intrusive phases i2 (<b>A</b>), i3a (<b>B</b>), i4 (<b>C</b>), and i5 (<b>D</b>). The diagrams on the left are Concordia plots. Middle diagrams are weighted mean plots, and images on the right show pieces of representative material from the drillhole sample interval that was submitted for dating. Red ellipses in the Concordia plots and red bars in weighted mean plots denote the data for the youngest crystalizing zircons in the sample (autocrysts). The grey zone in the weighted mean plots represents the 2σ uncertainty limits whereas the green line represents the weighted mean. Images are also shown of the dated phases.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Summary of results from in situ LA-ICP-MS U–Pb dating of zircon for various intrusive rocks (<b>A</b>–<b>E</b>) in the Klaza setting shown in both weighted mean plots and Concordia diagrams. Red bars in the weighted mean plots denote data used for calculating the weighted mean age constraints. The grey zone in the weighted mean plots represents the 2σ uncertainty limits whereas the green line represents the weighted mean. Images are also shown of the dated phases.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Schematic diagram depicting the provenance of igneous zircon in the different magmatic phases of the Klaza setting. This diagram illustrates the complexities of the magmatic environment of the Klaza system, where the Whitehorse suite, Casino suite, and Prospector Mountain suite share a common reservoir, resulting in the inheritance issues described above. Care must be taken by the geochronologist to ensure that only autocrysts are used in constraining the crystallization age of the intrusive phase.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Plots of chondrite-normalized REE values for each group of zircons showing the range in grey and averages marked by dots. The diagrams are arranged in the order of Whitehorse suite (<b>A</b>), Casino suite (<b>B</b>) and Prospector Mountain suite (<b>C</b>). Chondrite data from Sun and McDonough [<a href="#B62-minerals-15-00038" class="html-bibr">62</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Summary of the trace element chemistry of zircons from different phases at the Klaza setting. (<b>A</b>) Binary plot comparing Hf/Y with Th/U. (<b>B</b>) Binary plot comparing Yb/Gd with Th/U. (<b>C</b>) Binary plot comparing Yb/Gd with Sm/Ce. (<b>D</b>) Binary plot comparing Gd with Yb. (<b>E</b>) Binary plot comparing Nb/Ta with Th/U. (<b>F</b>) Binary plot comparing calculated zircon U–Pb ages with Th/U.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Summary of age, inferred temperatures of formation, and geochemical data for zircons from the different phases in the Klaza study area. (<b>A</b>–<b>D</b>) Binary plots comparing the calculated temperature based on Ti in zircon to Hf (<b>A</b>), calculated age (<b>B</b>), Eu/Eu* (<b>C</b>), and Ce/Ce*C (<b>D</b>). (<b>E</b>) Binary plot comparing Eu/Eu* with Ce/Ce*C. (<b>F</b>) Binary plot comparing calculated U–Pb ages with Ce/Ce*C.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Histogram and relative probability plots for the various geochronological data (U–Pb zircon and Ar–Ar muscovite) from this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Compilation of geochronological data relevant to the Klaza study area based on this study and data from previous workers. Cited geochronological data are from Mortensen et al. [<a href="#B17-minerals-15-00038" class="html-bibr">17</a>,<a href="#B70-minerals-15-00038" class="html-bibr">70</a>], Selby and Creaser [<a href="#B33-minerals-15-00038" class="html-bibr">33</a>], Selby et al. [<a href="#B34-minerals-15-00038" class="html-bibr">34</a>], and Stevens et al. [<a href="#B71-minerals-15-00038" class="html-bibr">71</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>(<b>A</b>) Schematic tectonic model from the Late Triassic to the mid-Cretaceous (90 Ma), based on models proposed by Monger and Gibson [<a href="#B91-minerals-15-00038" class="html-bibr">91</a>]. (<b>B</b>) Schematic tectonic model for the Late Cretaceous (80–65 Ma) supported by the model proposed by Gabrielse et al. [<a href="#B92-minerals-15-00038" class="html-bibr">92</a>]. (<b>C</b>–<b>E</b>) Schematic petrogenetic evolution of the district from the Late Triassic to the latest Cretaceous. Note the inset key in the upper right for various magmatic events.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>(<b>A</b>) Simplified geological map of the Dawson Range including the Sixtymile area. Only igneous rocks comprising ages discussed in this contribution are displayed. (<b>B</b>) Compilation of geochronologic data for other Late Cretaceous porphyry–epithermal occurrences in the Dawson Range Gold Belt. Regional geochronology data sourced from Allan et al. [<a href="#B1-minerals-15-00038" class="html-bibr">1</a>], Mortensen et al. [<a href="#B17-minerals-15-00038" class="html-bibr">17</a>], Mottram et al. [<a href="#B32-minerals-15-00038" class="html-bibr">32</a>], Selby and Creaser [<a href="#B33-minerals-15-00038" class="html-bibr">33</a>], Selby et al. [<a href="#B34-minerals-15-00038" class="html-bibr">34</a>], Stevens et al. [<a href="#B71-minerals-15-00038" class="html-bibr">71</a>], Bineli-Betsi et al. [<a href="#B95-minerals-15-00038" class="html-bibr">95</a>], Bineli-Betsi and Bennette [<a href="#B96-minerals-15-00038" class="html-bibr">96</a>], Friend [<a href="#B97-minerals-15-00038" class="html-bibr">97</a>], Bennett et al. [<a href="#B98-minerals-15-00038" class="html-bibr">98</a>], and Godwin [<a href="#B99-minerals-15-00038" class="html-bibr">99</a>].</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 7027 KiB  
Article
The Northernmost Effects of the Neo-Tethys Oceanic Slab Subduction Under the Lhasa Terrane: Evidence from the Mazin Rhyolite Porphyry
by Zhuosheng Wang, Nan Wang, Zhibo Liu and Xudong Ma
Minerals 2024, 14(12), 1292; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14121292 - 20 Dec 2024
Viewed by 453
Abstract
The India–Asia collision represents the most significant geological event in the formation of the Tibetan plateau. The subsidence of the Neo-Tethys oceanic slab and the closure of the ocean basin were precursors of the India–Asia collision. The Linzizong volcanic formations, which range in [...] Read more.
The India–Asia collision represents the most significant geological event in the formation of the Tibetan plateau. The subsidence of the Neo-Tethys oceanic slab and the closure of the ocean basin were precursors of the India–Asia collision. The Linzizong volcanic formations, which range in age from the late Cretaceous to early Cenozoic (70–40 Ma), are widely distributed across the Lhasa terrane and are considered products of the closure of the Neo-Tethys oceanic basin and the India–Asia collision. Here, we report a newly identified series of rhyolite porphyries, which share similar age and geochemical features with typical Linzizong volcanic formations. These porphyries are the northernmost extension of Linzizong volcanic formations discovered to date. Zircon U-Pb dating suggests that they formed between 58.8 and 56.1 Ma. These porphyries are characterized by high SiO2 (75.04%–77.82%), total alkali (K2O: 4.71%–5.03%), and Na2O (2.54%–3.63%) values; relatively low Al2O3 (12.30%–13.62%) and MgO (0.13%–0.33%) values; and low Mg# values (15.8–25.7). They also exhibit strong enrichment in light rare earth elements ([La/Yb]N = 3.76–11.08); negative Eu anomalies (Eu/Eu* = 0.10–0.32); Rb, Ba, Th, U, and Pb enrichments; as well as Nb and Ta depletions. The samples have relatively low εNd(t) values (−6.0 to −3.8) and variable zircon εHf(t) values (−6.3 to +3.6). These features suggest they originated from the remelting of the juvenile lower crust of the North Lhasa terrane under high-temperature and extensional conditions. We propose that the Mazin rhyolite porphyries resulted from mantle-derived magma diapirism, triggering juvenile lower crust remelting during Neo-Tethys oceanic slab rollback at the onset of the India–Asia collision. These findings provide new insights into the magmatic processes associated with early collisional tectonics. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tectonic Evolution of the Tethys Ocean in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Topographic map of Tibetan Plateau. (<b>b</b>) Geological map illustrating spatial distribution of Mesozoic-Cenozoic magmatism (modified from [<a href="#B40-minerals-14-01292" class="html-bibr">40</a>]). (<b>c</b>) Geological map of study area, Baingoin County, northern Lhasa Terrane (modified from [<a href="#B41-minerals-14-01292" class="html-bibr">41</a>]). LMF = Luobadui–Milashan Fault; KF = Karakoram Fault; ATF = Altyn Tagh Fault; IYZS = Indus-Yarlung Zangbo suture zone; SNMZ = Shiquan River–Nam Tso mélange zone; JSS = Jinsha suture zone; BNS = Bangong–Nujiang suture zone.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Long view of Mazin rhyolite porphyry. (<b>b</b>) Photograph of Mazin rhyolite porphyry outcrop. (<b>c</b>) Close-up image of Mazin rhyolite porphyry. (<b>d</b>) Breccias from wall rock associated with Mazin rhyolite porphyry.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Zircon U-Pb isotope concordia diagrams and representative cathodoluminescence images of zircon from Mazin rhyolite porphyry, Baingoin County, northern Lhasa Terrane. (<b>a</b>) BGA38-3; (<b>b</b>) BGA40-3; ‘n’ denotes number of samples; ‘MSWD’ represents mean square of weighted deviations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Diagram of zircon εHf(t) versus zircon <sup>206</sup>Pb/<sup>238</sup>U age (Ma). Zircon εHf(t) data for Xiongmei granite were compiled from [<a href="#B43-minerals-14-01292" class="html-bibr">43</a>]; for Norite, data were compiled from [<a href="#B44-minerals-14-01292" class="html-bibr">44</a>]; and for Xietongmen rhyolite, data were compiled from [<a href="#B29-minerals-14-01292" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Total alkalis versus SiO<sub>2</sub> diagram. (<b>b</b>) Diagram of Zr/TiO<sub>2</sub> × 0.0001 versus Nb/Y. (<b>c</b>) A/NK versus A/CNK [where A/NK = molar Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/(Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O); A/CNK = molar Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/(CaO + Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O)] [<a href="#B45-minerals-14-01292" class="html-bibr">45</a>]; (<b>d</b>) K<sub>2</sub>O versus SiO<sub>2</sub> [<a href="#B46-minerals-14-01292" class="html-bibr">46</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Chondrite-normalized rare earth element spidergram and (<b>b</b>) primitive mantle-normalized trace element spidergram for Mazin rhyolite porphyry, Baingoin County, North Lhasa Terrane. Normalized values were sourced from [<a href="#B47-minerals-14-01292" class="html-bibr">47</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">w</span>(SiO<sub>2</sub>)/% versus <span class="html-italic">w</span>(P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>)/%; (<b>b</b>) 10000Ga/Al versus <span class="html-italic">w</span>(Zr)/10<sup>−6</sup>; (<b>c</b>) Zr+Ce+Nb+Y versus10000 Ga/Al; (<b>d</b>) TFeO/MgO versus Zr+Nb+Ce+Y (FG = high-grade metamorphic granite, OGT = undifferentiated I-type, S-type, and M-type granites) [<a href="#B65-minerals-14-01292" class="html-bibr">65</a>,<a href="#B66-minerals-14-01292" class="html-bibr">66</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) Sr\Y versus La/Yb. (<b>b</b>) Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>\(FeO<sup>T</sup> + MgO + TiO<sub>2</sub>) versus Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> + FeO<sup>T</sup> + TiO<sub>2</sub> (HP means high pressure; LP means low pressure) [<a href="#B71-minerals-14-01292" class="html-bibr">71</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a</b>) Y × 10<sup>−6</sup> versus SiO<sub>2</sub>; (<b>b</b>) Nb/Zr versus Zr × 10<sup>−6</sup>; (<b>c</b>) R2 versus R1; (<b>d</b>) Rb × 10<sup>−6</sup> versus (Y + Nb) × 10<sup>−6</sup> (modified based on [<a href="#B80-minerals-14-01292" class="html-bibr">80</a>,<a href="#B81-minerals-14-01292" class="html-bibr">81</a>,<a href="#B82-minerals-14-01292" class="html-bibr">82</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Schematic illustrations depicting the remote effects of the Paleogene geodynamic evolution processes associated with the Neo-Tethys oceanic tectonic regime in the northern Lhasa Terrane.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 4151 KiB  
Article
Process and Mechanism of Exhumation in the Southern Altai Mountains, Northwest China
by Shiyu Li, Wanming Yuan, Zhidan Zhao, Aikui Zhang, Guochen Dong, Xiaowei Li and Wenli Sun
Minerals 2024, 14(12), 1234; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14121234 - 3 Dec 2024
Viewed by 565
Abstract
This study presents new fission track data from 40 apatite and 40 zircon samples in the Southern Altai Mountains (SAMs), revealing apatite fission track (AFT) ages of 110 ± 8 Ma to 54 ± 4 Ma and zircon fission track (ZFT) ages of [...] Read more.
This study presents new fission track data from 40 apatite and 40 zircon samples in the Southern Altai Mountains (SAMs), revealing apatite fission track (AFT) ages of 110 ± 8 Ma to 54 ± 4 Ma and zircon fission track (ZFT) ages of 234 ± 24 Ma to 86 ± 7 Ma. The exhumation rates derived from three thermochronological methods range from 0.01 to 0.1 km/Ma (Age-Elevation method), 0.01 to 0.14 km/Ma (Half-Space thermal model), and 0.027 to 0.075 km/Ma (Age2exhume model). Thermal history modeling using HeFTy software reveals similar thermal histories on both sides of the Kangbutiebao Fault, with a notable cooling event and higher exhumation rates to the northeast. The Late Cretaceous (100–75 Ma) rapid cooling is associated with tectonic reactivation, likely linked to the collapse of the Mongol–Okhotsk Orogen and slab rollback in the southern Tethys Ocean. In the Late Cenozoic (10–0 Ma), cooling and uplift reflect the influence of tectonic stresses from the India–Eurasia collision, which also drove the reactivation of the Kangbutiebao Fault. These findings suggest a complex interplay of tectonic processes driving exhumation in the SAMs from the Late Jurassic to the Early Paleogene. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Location of Altai Mountains [<a href="#B18-minerals-14-01234" class="html-bibr">18</a>]. (<b>b</b>) Distribution map of samples. They are divided into 3 groups according to different structural locations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Low-temperature thermochronological age distribution in SAMs. (<b>a</b>) Apatite fission track age distribution. (<b>b</b>) Zircon fission track age distribution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>AFT and ZFT Age-Elevation relationships. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>). Apatite and zircon Age-Elevation Relationships for Group 1 samples, northeast of the Kangbutiebao fault. (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>). Apatite and zircon Age-Elevation Relationships for Group 2 samples, southwest of the Kangbutiebao fault. (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>). Apatite and zircon Age-Elevation Relationships for Group 3 samples, southwest of the Kangbutiebao fault. The vertical coordinate here is the altitude of the sample (measured by GPS) plus the closure depth (Zc). The symbol “?” in the figure indicates a possible tectonic event during this stage. However, due to the limited number of sample points, the presence of such an event cannot be definitively confirmed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Exhumation rates for AFT and ZFT low-temperature thermochronology systems calculated using the Half-Space Thermal Model. (<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>) Exhumation rate results of three groups of AFT and ZFT thermochronological systems calculated using the half-space thermal model. Each line segment represents a sample, and the intersection range represents the exhumation rate range. (<b>g</b>) summary of the exhumation rates from panel a to f.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Summary of Thermal History Models Simulated with HeFTy Software for the Three Groups. (<b>a</b>) Summary of thermal history models for Group 1. (<b>b</b>) Summary of thermal history models for Group 2. (<b>c</b>) Summary of thermal history models for Group 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Exhumation rates calculated using Age2exhume. The black horizontal lines in the figure are the A–A′ and B–B′ cross-sections, which are used to analyze the spatial characteristics of the exhumation rate. (<b>a</b>) AFT system. (<b>b</b>) Relationship characteristics of the erosion rate of points on the profile line A–A′. (<b>c</b>) ZFT system. (<b>d</b>) Relationship characteristics of the erosion rate of points on the profile line B–B′.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 20991 KiB  
Article
Petrogenesis of Diorite-Porphyrite in the Southern Xintai Area of the Mid-Western Shandong Peninsula, North China Craton: Insights from Geochronology, Mineralogy, Geochemistry, and Sr-Nd-Hf Isotopes
by Lijie Jin, Jilin Wang, Pinrui Qin, Chunjia Li, Shuang Xu, Zhixin Han, Wei Wang, Wei Liu, Zisheng Wang, Jilei Gao and Fangfang Li
Minerals 2024, 14(12), 1220; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14121220 - 29 Nov 2024
Viewed by 516
Abstract
The Early Cretaceous intermediate intrusive rocks have important significance in understanding the crust–mantle interaction, iron mineralization, and tectonic evolution in the western Shandong Peninsula. In this study, we present new zircon U–Pb ages, and Hf isotope, whole-rock geochemistry, Sr–Nd isotopes, and the mineral [...] Read more.
The Early Cretaceous intermediate intrusive rocks have important significance in understanding the crust–mantle interaction, iron mineralization, and tectonic evolution in the western Shandong Peninsula. In this study, we present new zircon U–Pb ages, and Hf isotope, whole-rock geochemistry, Sr–Nd isotopes, and the mineral chemistry of the diorite-porphyrite in the southern Xintai area, mid-western Shandong Peninsula. The diorite-porphyrite formed at ca. 125 Ma. They have intermediate SiO2 (59.57–62.29 wt.%) and MgO (2.78–3.58 wt.%) contents, high Mg# values (53–56), high Sr (589–939 ppm) and low Y (9.2–10.8 ppm) contents, and high Sr/Y ratios (54–94), showing adakitic affinity. The diorite-porphyrite exhibits lower zircon εHf(t) values (−30.1 to 7.5) and whole-rock εNd(t) values (−3.5 to −6.0), with (87Sr/86Sr)i ratios of 0.70514–0.70567. We suggest that the diorite-porphyrite was derived from the partial melting of the local delamination of lower continental crust and then by the interaction with the enriched lithospheric mantle. The genesis of diorite-porphyrite may be related to the rollback process of the Paleo-Pacific slab in the Early Cretaceous. This geodynamic process induced the melting of the enriched lithospheric mantle, subducted oceanic crust, and local delamination of lower continental crust, which produced different types of adakitic magmatism in the western Shandong Peninsula. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Tectonic subdivision of the NCC (after [<a href="#B43-minerals-14-01220" class="html-bibr">43</a>]). (<b>b</b>) Simplified geological map of Shandong Peninsula (after [<a href="#B27-minerals-14-01220" class="html-bibr">27</a>]). (<b>c</b>) Geological sketch map of the southern Xintai area of the mid-western Shandong Peninsula.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Representative photographs and photomicrographs of diorite-porphyrite in the Xintai area. (<b>a</b>) The diorite-porphyrite intruded into the Lower Cambrian Mantou Formation; (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>) Field photographs of diorite-porphyrite; (<b>d</b>,<b>e</b>) SEM images of porphyritic texture in diorite-porphyrite; (<b>f</b>) Representative plagioclase phenocryst in cross-polarized light.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Typical zircon CL images and zircon U–Pb concordia diagrams of diorite-porphyrite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Diagrams of (<b>a</b>) (K<sub>2</sub>O + Na<sub>2</sub>O) versus SiO<sub>2</sub> (TAS; [<a href="#B56-minerals-14-01220" class="html-bibr">56</a>]); (<b>b</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub> versus K<sub>2</sub>O [<a href="#B57-minerals-14-01220" class="html-bibr">57</a>]; A/CNK versus A/NK [<a href="#B58-minerals-14-01220" class="html-bibr">58</a>]. (<b>c</b>) Data sources: Adakitic rocks from Tiezhai [<a href="#B22-minerals-14-01220" class="html-bibr">22</a>]; Mengyin and Liujing [<a href="#B33-minerals-14-01220" class="html-bibr">33</a>]; Mafic intrusive rocks [<a href="#B11-minerals-14-01220" class="html-bibr">11</a>]; Laiwu ore-related intrusive rocks [<a href="#B55-minerals-14-01220" class="html-bibr">55</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Variation in (<b>a</b>) MgO, (<b>b</b>) Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub><sup>T</sup>, (<b>c</b>) CaO, (<b>d</b>) Na<sub>2</sub>O, (<b>e</b>) TiO<sub>2</sub>, (<b>f</b>) Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, (<b>g</b>) K<sub>2</sub>O, and (<b>h</b>) P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> versus SiO<sub>2</sub> for the samples. Data sources are the same as <a href="#minerals-14-01220-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Chondrite-normalized REE patterns and (<b>b</b>) primitive mantle-normalized element spidergrams. The values used for normalization are adopted from [<a href="#B59-minerals-14-01220" class="html-bibr">59</a>]. Data sources are the same as <a href="#minerals-14-01220-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Diagram of (<sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr)<sub>i</sub> versus ε<sub>Nd</sub>(t) values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Diagram of zircon <sup>206</sup>Pb/<sup>238</sup>U ages versus ε<sub>Hf</sub>(t) values of adakitic rocks, mafic intrusions/dykes and alkaline complex.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Diagrams of (<b>a</b>) hornblende classification [<a href="#B64-minerals-14-01220" class="html-bibr">64</a>]; (<b>b</b>) hornblende equilibrium temperature versus equilibrium pressure; (<b>c</b>) plagioclase Or-Ab-An [<a href="#B65-minerals-14-01220" class="html-bibr">65</a>]; (<b>d</b>,<b>e</b>) variation in An and FeO values of plagioclase phenocrysts.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Diagrams of (<b>a</b>) Ni versus MgO; (<b>b</b>) CaO/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> versus MgO [<a href="#B27-minerals-14-01220" class="html-bibr">27</a>]. Data sources are the same as <a href="#minerals-14-01220-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Plots of (<b>a</b>) Sr/Y versus Y and (<b>b</b>) (La/Yb)<sub>N</sub> versus Yb<sub>N</sub> (after [<a href="#B68-minerals-14-01220" class="html-bibr">68</a>]). Data sources are the same as <a href="#minerals-14-01220-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Plots of (<b>a</b>) Mg# versus SiO<sub>2</sub> (after [<a href="#B80-minerals-14-01220" class="html-bibr">80</a>]), (<b>b</b>) Ni versus SiO<sub>2</sub>, and (<b>c</b>) Cr versus SiO<sub>2</sub> (after [<a href="#B81-minerals-14-01220" class="html-bibr">81</a>]). Data sources are the same as <a href="#minerals-14-01220-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Plots of (<b>a</b>) Ba versus Nb/Y, (<b>b</b>) Th/Yb versus Ba/La, (<b>c</b>) Ba/Y versus Nb/Y, (<b>d</b>) Th/Yb versus Sr/Nd (after [<a href="#B76-minerals-14-01220" class="html-bibr">76</a>]). Data sources are the same as <a href="#minerals-14-01220-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Schematic diagram of the evolution in the Early Cretaceous. Modified form [<a href="#B27-minerals-14-01220" class="html-bibr">27</a>].</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 7689 KiB  
Article
Development of High-Silica Adakitic Intrusions in the Northern Appalachians of New Brunswick (Canada), and Their Correlation with Slab Break-Off: Insights into the Formation of Fertile Cu-Au-Mo Porphyry Systems
by Fazilat Yousefi, David R. Lentz, James A. Walker and Kathleen G. Thorne
Geosciences 2024, 14(9), 241; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences14090241 - 7 Sep 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 985
Abstract
High-silica adakites exhibit specific compositions, as follows: SiO2 ≥ 56 wt.%, Al2O3 ≥ 15 wt.%, Y ≤ 18 ppm, Yb ≤ 1.9 ppm, K2O/Na2O ≥ 1, MgO < 3 wt.%, high Sr/Y (≥10), and La/Yb [...] Read more.
High-silica adakites exhibit specific compositions, as follows: SiO2 ≥ 56 wt.%, Al2O3 ≥ 15 wt.%, Y ≤ 18 ppm, Yb ≤ 1.9 ppm, K2O/Na2O ≥ 1, MgO < 3 wt.%, high Sr/Y (≥10), and La/Yb (>10). Devonian I-type adakitic granitoids in the northern Appalachians of New Brunswick (NB, Canada) share geochemical signatures of adakites elsewhere, i.e., SiO2 ≥ 66.46 wt.%, Al2O3 > 15.47 wt.%, Y ≤ 22 ppm, Yb ≤ 2 ppm, K2O/Na2O > 1, MgO < 3 wt.%, Sr/Y ≥ 33 to 50, and La/Yb > 10. Remarkably, adakitic intrusions in NB, including the Blue Mountain Granodiorite Suite, Nicholas Denys, Sugar Loaf, Squaw Cap, North Dungarvan River, Magaguadavic Granite, Hampstead Granite, Tower Hill, Watson Brook Granodiorite, Rivière-Verte Porphyry, Eagle Lake Granite, Evandale Granodiorite, North Pole Stream Suite, and the McKenzie Gulch porphyry dykes all have associated Cu mineralization, similar to the Middle Devonian Cu porphyry intrusions in Mines Gaspé, Québec. Trace element data support the connection between adakite formation and slab break-off, a mechanism influencing fertility and generation of porphyry Cu systems. These adakitic rocks in NB are oxidized, and are relatively enriched in large ion lithophile elements, like Cs, Rb, Ba, and Pb, and depleted in some high field strength elements, like Y, Nb, Ta, P, and Ti; they also have Sr/Y ≥ 33 to 50, Nb/Y > 0.4, Ta/Yb > 0.3, La/Yb > 10, Ta/Yb > 0.3, Sm/Yb > 2.5, Gd/Yb > 2.0, Nb + Y < 60 ppm, and Ta + Yb < 6 ppm. These geochemical indicators point to failure of a subducting oceanic slab (slab rollback to slab break-off) in the terminal stages of subduction, as the generator of post-collisional granitoid magmatism. The break-off and separation of a dense subducted oceanic plate segment leads to upwelling asthenosphere, heat advection, and selective partial melting of the descending oceanic slab (adakite) and (or) suprasubduction zone lithospheric mantle. The resulting silica-rich adakitic magmas ascend through thickened mantle lithosphere, with minimal affect from the asthenosphere. The critical roles of transpression and transtension are highlighted in facilitating the ascent and emplacement of these fertile adakitic magmas in postsubduction zone settings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Zircon U-Pb Geochronology Applied to Tectonics and Ore Deposits)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Major tectonic zones of the Canadian Appalachians; (<b>b</b>) Tectonic zones and cover sequences of New Brunswick (modified from [<a href="#B27-geosciences-14-00241" class="html-bibr">27</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Regional map of the New Brunswick Appalachians, showing the location of Devonian mafic-to-felsic granitoids and major faults (modified from [<a href="#B28-geosciences-14-00241" class="html-bibr">28</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Geochemical discrimination diagrams for adakitic samples investigated: (<b>a</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub> vs. Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O discrimination diagram. Field boundaries from Cox et al. [<a href="#B32-geosciences-14-00241" class="html-bibr">32</a>]; (<b>b</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub> vs. K<sub>2</sub>O discrimination diagram with field boundaries from [<a href="#B33-geosciences-14-00241" class="html-bibr">33</a>]; (<b>c</b>) Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/(CaO + K<sub>2</sub>O + Na<sub>2</sub>O) (A/CNK) vs. Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/(Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O) (A/NK) diagram modified from [<a href="#B34-geosciences-14-00241" class="html-bibr">34</a>]. The line with an amount of A/CNK = 1.1 is a key parameter to discriminate S- from I-type granites [<a href="#B35-geosciences-14-00241" class="html-bibr">35</a>]; (<b>d</b>) FeOt/(FeOt + MgO) vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> discrimination diagram with field boundaries from [<a href="#B36-geosciences-14-00241" class="html-bibr">36</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) (La/Yb)<sub>N</sub> vs. (Yb)<sub>N</sub> discrimination diagram with field boundaries from [<a href="#B37-geosciences-14-00241" class="html-bibr">37</a>]; (<b>b</b>) Sr/Y vs. Y discrimination diagram with field boundaries from [<a href="#B37-geosciences-14-00241" class="html-bibr">37</a>]; (<b>c</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub> vs. MgO discrimination diagram for high- and low-silica adakite; (<b>d</b>) primitive mantle-normalized extended element spider diagram. Symbols are the same as <a href="#geosciences-14-00241-f003" class="html-fig">Figure 3</a>. Normalized factors are from [<a href="#B38-geosciences-14-00241" class="html-bibr">38</a>]. TTG = tonalite–trondhjemite–granodiorite, ADR = andesite–dacite–rhyolite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Harker diagrams of Devonian adakitic rocks of NB. SiO<sub>2</sub> vs. (<b>a</b>) TiO<sub>2</sub>, (<b>b</b>) Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, (<b>c</b>) Ni, and (<b>d</b>) Co. The same symbols as <a href="#geosciences-14-00241-f003" class="html-fig">Figure 3</a> are used. The arrows indicate a general fractionation trend towards high silica.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Geochemical discrimination diagrams. (<b>a</b>) FeOt/MgO vs. Zr + Nb + Ce + Y (ppm) and (<b>b</b>) Zr + Nb + Ce + Y (ppm) vs. (Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O)/CaO. Field boundaries are from [<a href="#B40-geosciences-14-00241" class="html-bibr">40</a>]. A-type: A-type granite, FG: fractionated granite rocks, OTG: unfractionated granite/other type of granite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Tectonomagmatic discrimination diagrams for differentiating among slab failure, arc, and A-type granites applied to the New Brunswick granites investigated. (<b>a</b>) Nb + Y vs. Ta/Yb; (<b>b</b>) Ta + Yb vs. Ta/Yb; (<b>c</b>) Nb + Y vs. La/Yb; (<b>d</b>) Ta + Yb vs. Sm/Yb; (<b>e</b>) Nb + Y vs. Gd/Yb; (<b>f</b>) Ta + Yb vs. Gd/Yb; (<b>g</b>) Nb + Y vs. Nb/Y; (<b>h</b>) Ta + Yb vs. Nb/Y. All field boundaries are from [<a href="#B48-geosciences-14-00241" class="html-bibr">48</a>,<a href="#B50-geosciences-14-00241" class="html-bibr">50</a>,<a href="#B51-geosciences-14-00241" class="html-bibr">51</a>], respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Continuation of tectonomagmatic discrimination diagrams. (<b>a</b>) Gd/Yb vs. La/Yb; (<b>b</b>) Sm/Yb vs. La/Sm; (<b>c</b>) Ta + Yb vs. Rb; (<b>d</b>) Nb + Y vs. Rb; (<b>e</b>) Y vs. Nb; (<b>f</b>) Yb vs. Ta. Symbols as in <a href="#geosciences-14-00241-f007" class="html-fig">Figure 7</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Tectonic discrimination diagrams for adakitic rocks investigated in this study. (<b>a</b>) Nb/Yb vs. Th/Yb, and (<b>b</b>) TiO<sub>2</sub>/Yb vs. Nb/Yb. Field boundaries are from [<a href="#B53-geosciences-14-00241" class="html-bibr">53</a>]. MORB: mid-ocean ridge basalt, OIB: ocean island basalt, Th: tholeiite, Alk: alkaline, EMORB: enriched mid-ocean ridge basalt, NMORB: normal mid-ocean ridge. Symbols as in <a href="#geosciences-14-00241-f007" class="html-fig">Figure 7</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Discrimination diagrams for the determination of magmatic source rocks for adakites in New Brunswick. (<b>a</b>) MgO (wt.%) vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> (wt.%), and (<b>b</b>) Mg<sup>#</sup> vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> (wt.%) diagrams for determining the effective factors in creating these adakitic magmas. Symbols as in <a href="#geosciences-14-00241-f007" class="html-fig">Figure 7</a>. Field boundaries are from [<a href="#B54-geosciences-14-00241" class="html-bibr">54</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Tectonic discrimination diagram for New Brunswick adakites. Field boundaries are from [<a href="#B55-geosciences-14-00241" class="html-bibr">55</a>]. Hb: hornblende, An: anorthite, Ab: albite, En: enstatite, Fa: fayalite, Fo: forsterite, Bt: biotite, Fs: feldspar, Sp: sphene (titanite), Hd: hedenbergite, Ha: haapalaite, and Di: diopside. Symbols as in <a href="#geosciences-14-00241-f007" class="html-fig">Figure 7</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Schematic model showing the Silurian–Carboniferous tectonic evolution of the northern Appalachian orogen, and the generation of slab break-off-generated magmas; (<b>a</b>) late Silurian–Early Devonian, and (<b>b</b>) Middle Devonian–Early Carboniferous. Modified from [<a href="#B66-geosciences-14-00241" class="html-bibr">66</a>].</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 22614 KiB  
Article
Petrogenesis and Tectonic Setting of Early Cretaceous A-Type Granite from the Southern Great Xing’an Range, Northeastern China: Geochronological, Geochemical, and Hf Isotopic Evidence
by Xiangjin Ran, Xi Wang and Zhenming Sun
Minerals 2023, 13(12), 1523; https://doi.org/10.3390/min13121523 - 6 Dec 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1317
Abstract
The southern Great Xing’an Range is located in the eastern Central Asian Orogenic Belt, where voluminous igneous rocks developed during the Late Mesozoic period. The east slope of the southern Great Xing’an Range has been the topic of numerous debates on the level [...] Read more.
The southern Great Xing’an Range is located in the eastern Central Asian Orogenic Belt, where voluminous igneous rocks developed during the Late Mesozoic period. The east slope of the southern Great Xing’an Range has been the topic of numerous debates on the level of influence of the Mongol-Okhotsk and the Paleo-Pacific regimes in the Late Mesozoic period. Therefore, this area is a suitable region in which to study the temporal changes in magma sources and tectono-magmatic evolution. In this paper, whole-rock geochemical data, zircon U-Pb geochronology, and zircon Hf isotope studies were carried out on the granitoids in the east slope area of the southern Great Xing’an Range. LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb dating revealed the ages of four granitoid samples: 135.0 ± 0.6 Ma, 130.7 ± 1.4 Ma, 130.4 ± 1.0 Ma, and 127.6 ± 0.8 Ma, respectively. The Hf isotope values 176Hf/177Hf = 0.282751–0.283015, εHf (t) = +2.0~+11.5, and T2DM = 583~1442 Ma suggest that the magma was generated by partial melting of Meso- and Neoproterozoic accreted and thickened low crust. The whole-rock geochemical data implied that these granitoids are A-type granite and their formation is closely linked to the subduction of the Paleo-Pacific Ocean plate. These geochemical, isotopic, and geochronological data suggest that the Early Cretaceous magmatism in the east slope area of the southern Great Xing’an Range formed in an extensional back-arc tectonic setting associated with the slab roll-back of the Paleo-Pacific plate subduction. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Mineral Geochemistry and Geochronology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Schematic map of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt, showing the major tectonic entities and the location of <a href="#minerals-13-01523-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>b; (<b>b</b>) geotectonic division map of NE China (modified after [<a href="#B15-minerals-13-01523" class="html-bibr">15</a>]); (<b>c</b>) geological map showing distribution of magmatic rocks [<a href="#B36-minerals-13-01523" class="html-bibr">36</a>]; (<b>d</b>) geological map and sample locations of the study area in the southern GXR.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Representative field photographs showing the massive structure (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) and micrographic porphyritic textures (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>) of granitoids from the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> (after [<a href="#B58-minerals-13-01523" class="html-bibr">58</a>]), (<b>b</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub> vs. K<sub>2</sub>O (after [<a href="#B59-minerals-13-01523" class="html-bibr">59</a>]), and (<b>c</b>) A/NK versus A/CNK diagrams (after [<a href="#B60-minerals-13-01523" class="html-bibr">60</a>]) diagrams of granitoids from the southern GXR.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Chondrite-normalized REE (<b>a</b>) and primitive-mantle-normalized multi-element (<b>b</b>) diagrams for samples of the granitoids in study area (normalizing values are from ([<a href="#B61-minerals-13-01523" class="html-bibr">61</a>]); blue lines represent the study samples, and shaded fields represent A-type granite (data from Zhang et al. [<a href="#B62-minerals-13-01523" class="html-bibr">62</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Representative cathodoluminescence (CL) images of zircons from the granitoid rocks and Zircon U-Pb Concordia diagrams of the granitoid samples. (<b>a</b>) D5092; (<b>b</b>) PM103; (<b>c</b>) PM104; (<b>d</b>) PM105.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Correlations between ε<sub>Hf</sub>(t) and ages of zircons from the intrusions. CAOB = Central Asian Orogenic Belt; YFTB = Yanshan Fold and Thrust Belt. (<b>a</b>) Modified after [<a href="#B19-minerals-13-01523" class="html-bibr">19</a>,<a href="#B64-minerals-13-01523" class="html-bibr">64</a>] and (<b>b</b>) modified after [<a href="#B18-minerals-13-01523" class="html-bibr">18</a>,<a href="#B65-minerals-13-01523" class="html-bibr">65</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Discrimination diagrams of granite genetic type in the study area: (<b>a</b>) (K<sub>2</sub>O + Na<sub>2</sub>O) vs. 10,000 Ga/Al; (<b>b</b>) FeO/MgO vs. 10,000 Ga/Al; (<b>c</b>) Nb vs. 10,000 Ga/Al; and (<b>d</b>) Zr vs. 10,000 Ga/Al (after [<a href="#B2-minerals-13-01523" class="html-bibr">2</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) Ta + Yb vs. Rb diagram; (<b>b</b>) Y vs. Nb diagram [<a href="#B71-minerals-13-01523" class="html-bibr">71</a>]. Abbreviations: VAG—volcanic arc granite; ORG—ocean ridge granite; WPG—within-plate granite; Syn-COLG—syn-collision granite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a</b>) R1-10,000 Ga/Al diagram (after [<a href="#B101-minerals-13-01523" class="html-bibr">101</a>]) and (<b>b</b>) Nb-Y-Ce diagram (after [<a href="#B4-minerals-13-01523" class="html-bibr">4</a>]) of the granitoids from study area.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 6610 KiB  
Article
Late Cryogenian Circum-Rodinia Syn-Subduction Extension: Insights from Highly Fractionated S-Type and A-Type Granitoids in the Northern Tarim Craton
by Talifeng Biedilihan, Nijiati Abuduxun, Peng Huang, Jingmin Gan and Yilidan’na Talati
Minerals 2023, 13(11), 1446; https://doi.org/10.3390/min13111446 - 16 Nov 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1369
Abstract
Late Cryogenian–Ediacaran magmatism represents the latest Precambrian tectonothermal event in the Tarim Craton. However, its geodynamic setting and geological significance are controversial. Here, we report the geochronology, whole-rock geochemistry, and Sr-Nd-Hf isotopic compositions of newly identified late Cryogenian A-type and highly fractionated S-type [...] Read more.
Late Cryogenian–Ediacaran magmatism represents the latest Precambrian tectonothermal event in the Tarim Craton. However, its geodynamic setting and geological significance are controversial. Here, we report the geochronology, whole-rock geochemistry, and Sr-Nd-Hf isotopic compositions of newly identified late Cryogenian A-type and highly fractionated S-type granites from two locations in the northern Tarim Craton. LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb analyses yield ages of 642 ± 7 Ma for a syenogranite and 643 ± 4.5 Ma for a mylonitized granite. The syenogranite is weakly peraluminous and shows an A-type granite affinity, as indicated by its high K2O + Na2O contents (8.35–8.64 wt.%), high field strength elements (Zr + Nb + Ce + Y = 435.8 − 463.4 × 10−6), Ga/Al ratios (2.79−2.83), and zircon saturation temperatures (829–844 °C). In contrast, the mylonitized granite contains Al-oversaturated minerals (e.g., garnet) and has high a differentiation index (DI = of 98.9–99.4), with lower zircon saturation temperatures (786–792 °C); the samples display high SiO2 contents (72.99–74.00 wt.%) and A/CNK values (1.16–1.17) and low Nb/Ta and Zr/Hf ratios and are enriched in Rb and depleted in Ba, Sr, which all point to a highly fractionated S-type granite affinity. The granites are characterized by elevated large-ion lithosphere elements (LILEs) and flat high-field-strength elements (HFSEs) patterns, with deep Nb and Ta troughs and pronounced negative Eu anomalies (Eu/Eu* = 0.17–0.38). They show apparently negative εNd(t) values (−10.1 to −9.8 and −6.8 to −7.9, respectively) and εHf(t) values (−9.66 to −1.77 and −33.5 to −1.3, respectively) with Paleoproterozoic crustal model ages, indicating that they were mainly generated by the partial melting of mature crustal materials with a minor contribution from a mantle-derived magmatic source. By integrating with previously published geological, sedimentological, and structural data, we suggest that the granites formed due to a high-temperature gradient in a syn-subduction extensional setting that was probably induced by northward slab rollback of the Paleo-Asian Oceanic lithosphere. Our new data highlight an upper-plate extension in the northern Tarim Craton that constitutes the northern periphery of the Rodinia supercontinent. The linear distribution of late Cryogenian magmatic rocks provides critical evidence for the orogen strike extension of the terminal suture between the Tarim Craton and southwestern Altaids. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Mineral Geochemistry and Geochronology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Simplified tectonic map showing the Altaids and surrounding cratons (modified after [<a href="#B48-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">48</a>]). The position of (<b>b</b>) is marked. (<b>b</b>) Sketch map of the Tarim Craton and adjacent areas in northwestern China (modified after [<a href="#B17-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">17</a>]) showing spatial and temporal distributions of compiled crystallization ages of late Cryogenian–Ediacaran magmatism (see <a href="#app1-minerals-13-01446" class="html-app">Supplementary Table S1</a> for details and data sources). The position of the terminal suture between the Altaids and the Tarim Craton is according to [<a href="#B52-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">52</a>]. The position of <a href="#minerals-13-01446-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a> is marked. Abbreviations: NTS—North Tianshan; CTS—Central Tianshan; STS—South Tianshan; KYB—Kazakhstan-Yili Block. Literature data are from [<a href="#B17-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">17</a>,<a href="#B18-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">18</a>,<a href="#B19-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">19</a>,<a href="#B22-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">22</a>,<a href="#B23-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">23</a>,<a href="#B24-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B28-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">28</a>,<a href="#B29-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">29</a>,<a href="#B30-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">30</a>,<a href="#B31-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">31</a>,<a href="#B32-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">32</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Simplified geological map of the Ku’erchu and Yeyungou area in the northern Tarim Craton showing sampling sites and distribution of late Cryogenian–Ediacaran granitoids (see <a href="#app1-minerals-13-01446" class="html-app">Supplementary Table S1</a> for details and data sources). The tectonic boundary (thick black line) between the South Tianshan and Quruqtagh is according to [<a href="#B51-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">51</a>]. Its western extension, proposed in this study, is marked with a thick red line. The dashed line represents the previously proposed position of the suture [<a href="#B50-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">50</a>]. Literature data are from [<a href="#B17-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">17</a>,<a href="#B18-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">18</a>,<a href="#B23-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">23</a>,<a href="#B24-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B25-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">25</a>,<a href="#B29-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) A field photo showing that the syenogranite intruded Xingditagh Group in the Ku’erchu area. (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>) Field photos showing outcrops and field occurrences of the mylonitized granite and syenogranite. (<b>d</b>) A σ-type porphyroclast of plagioclase. (<b>e</b>) Mylonitic foliation in the granite. (<b>f</b>) Main mineral compositions of the syenogranite. (<b>g</b>) Ductile deformation of quartz grains in the mylonitized granite. (<b>h</b>) Main mineral compositions of the granitic mylonite showing the presence of Al-oversaturated minerals such as garnet. Abbreviations: Qtz—Quartz; Bt—Biotite; Grt—Garnet; Pl—Plagioclase; Mc—Microcline; Ms—Muscovite; Kfs—K-feldspar.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Representative cathodoluminescence (CL) images showing the internal structure of zircons. The U-Pb (solid red circles) and Hf (yellow dashed circles) analytical sites are marked, and the corresponding numbers refer to the analytical results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>U-Pb Concordia diagrams of zircons from the studied granites. Ages are in Ma and ellipses show 1σ errors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Crystallization age versus <span class="html-italic">ε</span><sub>Hf</sub> (t) diagram for igneous zircons from the studied granites in the northern Tarim. Literature data are from [<a href="#B17-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">17</a>,<a href="#B18-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">18</a>,<a href="#B20-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">20</a>,<a href="#B21-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">21</a>,<a href="#B25-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">25</a>,<a href="#B29-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Histograms of crustal Hf model age (<span class="html-italic">T</span><sub>DM2</sub>) versus crystallization age of zircons from the studied granites in the northern Tarim. Literature data are from [<a href="#B17-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">17</a>,<a href="#B18-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">18</a>,<a href="#B20-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">20</a>,<a href="#B21-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">21</a>,<a href="#B25-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">25</a>,<a href="#B29-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Geochemical classification diagrams of the studied granitoid, and their characteristic major elements. (<b>a</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub> (wt.%) versus (K<sub>2</sub>O + Na<sub>2</sub>O) (wt.%) diagram [<a href="#B60-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">60</a>] showing the samples plot in the fields of granite, which is consistent with their main mineral compositions shown in <a href="#minerals-13-01446-f003" class="html-fig">Figure 3</a>. (<b>b</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub> (wt.%) versus K<sub>2</sub>O (wt.%) diagram [<a href="#B61-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">61</a>] showing that the investigated granitoids belong to the high calc-alkaline series. (<b>c</b>) Plot of A/CNK (molar Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/[CaO + Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O]) versus A/NK (molar Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/[Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O]) [<a href="#B62-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">62</a>] showing the peraluminous to metaluminous nature of the granitoids. Literature data are from [<a href="#B17-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">17</a>,<a href="#B18-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">18</a>,<a href="#B19-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">19</a>,<a href="#B22-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">22</a>,<a href="#B24-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B25-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">25</a>,<a href="#B26-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">26</a>,<a href="#B30-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">30</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a</b>) Chondrite-normalized REE patterns. (<b>b</b>) Primitive mantle-normalized multi-element diagrams. Chondrite and primitive mantle values are from [<a href="#B63-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">63</a>]. Literature data are from [<a href="#B17-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">17</a>,<a href="#B18-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">18</a>,<a href="#B19-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">19</a>,<a href="#B25-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">25</a>,<a href="#B26-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">26</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Whole rock initial <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr versus <span class="html-italic">ε</span><sub>Nd</sub>(t) diagram of the studied granites in the northern Tarim.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Genetic discrimination diagrams of the studied granites in the northern Tarim. (<b>a</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub> (wt.%) versus A/CNK (molar Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/[CaO + Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O]) diagram [<a href="#B62-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">62</a>]; (<b>b</b>) Zr/Hf versus Nb/Ta diagram [<a href="#B72-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">72</a>]; (<b>c</b>) (Zr + Nb + Ce + Y) (ppm) versus (K<sub>2</sub>O + Na<sub>2</sub>O)/CaO; and (<b>d</b>) (Zr + Nb + Ce + Y) (ppm) versus FeO<sup>T</sup>/MgO diagrams [<a href="#B5-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">5</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>(<b>a</b>) Rb/Sr versus Rb/Ba [<a href="#B6-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">6</a>] and (<b>b</b>) molar CaO/(MgO + FeO<sup>T</sup>) versus molar Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/(MgO + FeO<sup>T</sup>) [<a href="#B85-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">85</a>] diagrams for the studied granites in the northern Tarim.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>(<b>a</b>) Yb (ppm) versus Ta (ppm) diagram [<a href="#B89-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">89</a>] and (<b>b</b>) (Yb+Ta) (ppm) versus Rb (ppm) diagram [<a href="#B89-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">89</a>] showing the volcanic arc origin of the late Cryogenian–early Ediacaran granitoids in the northern Tarim Craton. Literature data are from [<a href="#B17-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">17</a>,<a href="#B18-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">18</a>,<a href="#B19-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">19</a>,<a href="#B25-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">25</a>,<a href="#B26-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">26</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>(<b>a</b>) Nb-Y-3 Ga and (<b>b</b>) Nb-Y-Ce discrimination diagrams [<a href="#B4-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">4</a>] show the A<sub>2</sub>-subtype affinity of the A-type granites in the northern Tarim Craton. Literature data are from [<a href="#B17-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">17</a>,<a href="#B25-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">25</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>(<b>a</b>) A simplified map of circum-Rodinia subduction system in the late Neoproterozoic. Position and orientation of the Tarim Craton and other major continents are according to [<a href="#B10-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">10</a>]. (<b>b</b>) Schematic model illustrating the formation of the late Cryogenian granitoids in the northern Tarim Craton. Northward slab rollback of the Paleo-Asian Ocean [<a href="#B17-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">17</a>] induced upwelling of asthenosphere, which led to syn-subduction extension and large-scale crustal melting of the upper plate (modified after [<a href="#B93-minerals-13-01446" class="html-bibr">93</a>]).</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 10536 KiB  
Article
Zircon U-Pb Ages, Petrogenesis, and Tectono-Magmatic Evolution of Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous S-Type Granitoid in Wujinshan Area of Northwestern Zhejiang, South China
by Uzair Siddique, Zhijie Zeng, Fangjun Zhang, Muhammad Farhan, Chengliang Wang, Qijun Xia, Xiang Gao, Kunlun Zhang, Qin Gao and Zilong Li
Minerals 2023, 13(9), 1190; https://doi.org/10.3390/min13091190 - 10 Sep 2023
Viewed by 1501
Abstract
Northwest Zhejiang area (NWZJ) is one of the important parts of the large Qingzhou-Hangzhou mineralized belt in South China formed during the Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous period. Through the study of zircon LA-ICPMS U-Pb dating, whole-rock geochemistry, and Sr-Nd isotopes for the Wujinshan granitoid [...] Read more.
Northwest Zhejiang area (NWZJ) is one of the important parts of the large Qingzhou-Hangzhou mineralized belt in South China formed during the Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous period. Through the study of zircon LA-ICPMS U-Pb dating, whole-rock geochemistry, and Sr-Nd isotopes for the Wujinshan granitoid in NWZJ, two distinct S-type granitic rocks of porphyry type granodiorite and granite were identified, and the two ages of 146.4 ± 1.5 Ma for granodiorite porphyry and 141.9 ± 1.4 Ma for granite porphyries were obtained. These rocks exhibited a geochemical affinity for S-type granitoid, and the two magmatic ages indicate that these rocks were intruded in two magmatic pulses. The Late Jurassic granodiorite porphyry showed moderate SiO2 (64.38–67.89 wt.%) with higher K2O + Na2O (6.22–6.78 wt.%), lower K2O/Na2O (0.57–0.96), moderate Zr (170–215 ppm), high Sr (302–475 ppm), and low Mg# (31–32) contents. The Early Cretaceous granite porphyries contained high SiO2 (69.68–74.85 wt.%), variable K2O + Na2O (4.60–6.99), high K2O/Na2O (1.72–23.53), slightly higher Zr (160–255 ppm), variable Sr (25–412 ppm), and very low to intermediate Mg# (13–44). The granodiorites had intermediate ∑REE (149–177 ppm), while granite samples showed moderate to high ∑REE content (147–271 ppm), and both rocks showed negative Eu anomalies (0.18–0.29). We propose that these two rocks were predominantly generated by the partial melting of Mesoproterozoic metamorphic basement and underwent variable degrees of fractionation and evolution. The Late Jurassic granodiorite porphyry was formed by the partial melting of Mesoproterozoic metamorphic basement with slab-derived melts or basaltic lower crust input following fractional crystallization, while the Early Cretaceous granite porphyries were generated by the partial melting of Mesoproterozoic metamorphic basement and crystal fractionation with variable magma mixing and assimilation in the upper crust. Tectonically, the Wujinshan granitoid formed in a volcanic arc setting largely affected by the subduction and slab rollback of the paleo-Pacific Plate. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Sketch geological map of Southeast China; (<b>b</b>) geological map of Zhejiang Province, modified from Su et al. [<a href="#B28-minerals-13-01190" class="html-bibr">28</a>]; (<b>c</b>) geological map of the study area with marked location of Wujinshan pluton; (<b>d</b>) sketch geological map of Wujinshan magmatic complex with marked sample locations. Abbreviations of strata: Pt-T—pre-Jurassic, J1–2—Lower to Middle Jurassic, K1—Lower Cretaceous, K2—Upper Cretaceous, E—Paleogene, N-Q—Neogene and Quaternary. Abbreviation of faults: JSF—Jiangshang–Shaoxing Fault, ZDF—Zhenghe–Dabu Fault, CNF—Changle–Nan’ao Fault.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Representative field photo and photomicrographs of Wujinshan granitoid samples. (<b>a</b>) Field photo of granodiorite porphyry; (<b>b</b>–<b>e</b>) granodiorite porphyry; (<b>f</b>,<b>g</b>) granite porphyry; (<b>h</b>,<b>i</b>) granite porphyry dikes. Abbreviations: Qtz—quartz, Pl—plagioclase, Bt—biotite, Chl—chlorite, Ser—sericite, Mus—muscovite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Zircon U-Pb concordia diagrams and weighted mean ages of Wujinshan S-type granites. (<b>a</b>) Granodiorite, (<b>b</b>) granite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Classification diagrams of Late Jurassic granodiorite and Early Cretaceous granite from Wujinshan magmatic complex of (<b>a</b>) TAS diagram, SiO<sub>2</sub> vs. Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O [<a href="#B32-minerals-13-01190" class="html-bibr">32</a>]; (<b>b</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub> vs. K<sub>2</sub>O diagram [<a href="#B33-minerals-13-01190" class="html-bibr">33</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Variation diagrams for selected major and trace elements of Wujinshan granitoid. (<b>a</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub> vs. Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> diagram; (<b>b</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub> vs. Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> diagram; (<b>c</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub> vs. MgO diagram; (<b>d</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub> vs. P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> diagram; (<b>e</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub> vs. Eu diagram; (<b>f</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub> vs. Nb diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) A/NK vs. A/CNK diagram (after Maniar and Piccoli [<a href="#B35-minerals-13-01190" class="html-bibr">35</a>]); (<b>b</b>) aluminium saturation index (ASI) vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> (wt.%); (<b>c</b>) Fe−Index (FeO*/(FeO* + MgO) vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> (wt.%); and (<b>d</b>) modified alkali lime index vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> diagrams with Lachlan Fold Belt granites reference fields (Frost et al. [<a href="#B36-minerals-13-01190" class="html-bibr">36</a>] and references therein).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) Chondrite normalized REE patterns; and (<b>b</b>) primitive mantle-normalized spidergram for Wuijnshan S-type granitoids. Normalization values from [<a href="#B34-minerals-13-01190" class="html-bibr">34</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Granite discrimination diagrams of (<b>a</b>) Nb versus 10,000 × Ga/Al diagram [<a href="#B58-minerals-13-01190" class="html-bibr">58</a>]; and (<b>b</b>) Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-(Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O) versus CaO versus FeO<sup>T</sup> + MgO diagram [<a href="#B52-minerals-13-01190" class="html-bibr">52</a>] of Wujinshan granite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a</b>) CaO/Na<sub>2</sub>O vs. Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/TiO<sub>2</sub> diagram (after Sylvester [<a href="#B61-minerals-13-01190" class="html-bibr">61</a>] and Wang [<a href="#B62-minerals-13-01190" class="html-bibr">62</a>]); (<b>b</b>) Rb/Ba vs. Rb/Sr diagram [<a href="#B61-minerals-13-01190" class="html-bibr">61</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>(<b>a</b>) (Zr + Nb + Ce + Y) versus FeO<sup>T</sup>/MgO diagram [<a href="#B58-minerals-13-01190" class="html-bibr">58</a>]; and (<b>b</b>) Mg<sup>#</sup> versus SiO<sub>2</sub> diagram [<a href="#B63-minerals-13-01190" class="html-bibr">63</a>] of Wujinshan granioid. Notes: FG = Fractionated M-, I- and S-type granites, OGT = unfractionated M-, I- and S-type granites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>(<sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr)<sub>i</sub> versus εNd(t) diagram for Wujinshan granodiorite and other granitic suites in the NW Zhejiang. The published data include Huangbaikeng granodiorite porphyry [<a href="#B42-minerals-13-01190" class="html-bibr">42</a>,<a href="#B49-minerals-13-01190" class="html-bibr">49</a>], Baijuhuajian granite porphyry [<a href="#B43-minerals-13-01190" class="html-bibr">43</a>], Huangshitan granite, Jiuligang granite, Ruhong granite, Jiemeng and Datongkeng granodiorite porphyries [<a href="#B26-minerals-13-01190" class="html-bibr">26</a>], Tongcun granite porphyry [<a href="#B49-minerals-13-01190" class="html-bibr">49</a>], Dayutang granodiorite porphyry, and Xiatongcun monzogranite porphyry [<a href="#B42-minerals-13-01190" class="html-bibr">42</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Tectonic discrimination diagrams. (<b>a</b>) Yb vs. Ta diagram [<a href="#B70-minerals-13-01190" class="html-bibr">70</a>]; and (<b>b</b>) Rb/30-Hf-3Ta diagram [<a href="#B71-minerals-13-01190" class="html-bibr">71</a>] of Wujinshan granitoid. Notes: VAG = volcanic arc granite; ORG = oceanic ridge granite; WPG = within-plate granite; and Syn-COLG = syn-collisional granite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Simplified tectono-magmatic evolution model. Illustration of the Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous (150–135 Ma) tectonic evolution and magmatic dynamics in southeast China (after J. Zhou et al. [<a href="#B47-minerals-13-01190" class="html-bibr">47</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>(<b>a</b>) Molar element ratio diagram of (2Ca + Na + K)/Al vs. K/Al [<a href="#B87-minerals-13-01190" class="html-bibr">87</a>]. The arrows show the typical mass transfer processes and vectors towards associated alteration minerals; and (<b>b</b>) the M-F-W ternary plot showing the degree of alteration/weathering trends in the representative samples [<a href="#B86-minerals-13-01190" class="html-bibr">86</a>]. Notes: The three vertices M, F, and W represent unaltered mafic and felsic rocks and the completely weathered/altered rock material, respectively. M = exp[−0.395 × ln(SiO<sub>2</sub>) + 0.206 × ln(TiO<sub>2</sub>) − 0.316 × ln(Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) + 0.160 × ln(Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) + 0.246 × ln(MgO) + 0.368 × ln(CaO) + 0.073 × ln(Na<sub>2</sub>O) − 0.342 × ln(K<sub>2</sub>O) + 2.266], F = exp[0.191 × ln(SiO<sub>2</sub>) − 0.397 × ln(TiO<sub>2</sub>) + 0.020 × ln (Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) − 0.375 × ln(Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) −0.243 × ln(MgO) + 0.079 × ln(CaO) + 0.392 × ln(Na<sub>2</sub>O) + 0.333 × ln(K<sub>2</sub>O) − 0.892], W = exp[0.203 × ln(SiO<sub>2</sub>) + 0.191 × ln(TiO<sub>2</sub>) + 0.296 × ln(Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) + 0.215 × ln(Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) − 0.002 × ln(MgO) − 0.448 × ln(CaO) − 0.464 × ln(Na<sub>2</sub>O) + 0.008 × ln(K<sub>2</sub>O) − 1.374].</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 11641 KiB  
Article
Petrogenesis of the Laoshan Suite in the Jiaodong Peninsula (Eastern China): An Oxidized Low Ba–Sr A1-Type Granite
by Jian Li, Changwei Wang, Mingchun Song, Changjiang Wang, Shiyong Li, Xiao Liu and Qingyi Cui
Minerals 2023, 13(8), 1012; https://doi.org/10.3390/min13081012 - 29 Jul 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1423
Abstract
The Jiaodong Peninsula is closely related to Mesozoic granites in terms of spatial and temporal aspects. However, the specific association between the genesis of gold mineralization and these granites remains unclear. It is also ambiguous why Laoshan-type granites, which are similar to Mesozoic [...] Read more.
The Jiaodong Peninsula is closely related to Mesozoic granites in terms of spatial and temporal aspects. However, the specific association between the genesis of gold mineralization and these granites remains unclear. It is also ambiguous why Laoshan-type granites, which are similar to Mesozoic granites, are not gold mineralized. In this study, we analyzed the Laoshan granites and compiled Mesozoic magmatic rock data (Linglong, Guojialing, and Weideshan suites) of the Jiaodong Peninsula. We performed whole-rock major and trace elements, LA–ICP–MS zircon U–Pb geochronology and geochemistry analyses. Our zircon U–Pb data denote that the Laoshan granite was emplaced during the 118 ± 1 Ma. The Laoshan granite is characterized by high SiO2 content (76.03–80.28 wt.%), high TFe2O3/MgO (11.1–27.1) and Ga/Al (3.0–3.5) ratios, high zircon saturation temperature (809–850 °C), and negative Eu (Eu/Eu* = 0.05–0.08) anomalies, showing A-type granite characteristics. Furthermore, the Laoshan granite is identified as an A1-type granite with low Ba (33.1–42.0 ppm) and Sr (14.1–21.0 ppm) contents. It was formed in an extensional tectonic environment induced by the subducting slab roll-back of the Paleo-Pacific Plate, mainly from the partial melting of lower crustal materials, mixed with a small amount of mantle components. Zircon trace elements indicate that the Laoshan suite had relatively high oxygen fugacity and temperature (ΔFMQ = + 2.43 to + 4.22, T-Ti in zircon (mean) = 796 °C) compared to the pre-mineralization and contemporaneous mineralization magma. We propose that oxidized adakitic magma (Weideshan suite) may contribute to the enrichment and mineralization of gold. Although Laoshan-type granite also has a high oxygen fugacity, its location is distant from the ore-controlling faults, which ultimately hinders the formation of gold mineralization. From the Jurassic to the Cretaceous, the tectonic and geochemical properties of magmatic rocks in the Jiaodong Peninsula have changed, and gold deposits are formed in such a transitional process (compression to extension, reduction to oxidation). Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>A</b>). Distribution map of the main tectonic zones in the NCC (after Yang et al. [<a href="#B12-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">12</a>]); (<b>B</b>). Detailed geological map of the Jiaodong Peninsula (after Song et al. [<a href="#B4-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">4</a>,<a href="#B7-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">7</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Representative photomicrographs of the Laoshan suite from the Jiaodong Peninsula ((<b>A</b>). Field photo; (<b>B</b>). Hand specimen photo; (<b>C</b>). Plane-polarized photo; (<b>D</b>). Cross-polarized photo). Afs = Alkali feldspar; Pl = Plagioclase; Qtz = Quartz.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>A</b>). Representative CL images; (<b>B</b>). Chondrite-normalized REE patterns; (<b>C</b>). Zircon U–Pb concordia diagram. (<b>D</b>). Weighted mean <sup>206</sup>Pb/<sup>238</sup>U age diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Ce/Yb (<b>A</b>), Sc/Yb (<b>B</b>), ΔFMQ (<b>C</b>), Th/U (<b>D</b>), Gd/Yb (<b>E</b>), and U/Yb (<b>F</b>) vs. Hf plots of zircons from the Laoshan suite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Whole-rock geochemistry plots for the Jiaodong Peninsula Mesozoic granitoids. (<b>A</b>). Total alkalis (Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O) vs. silica (SiO<sub>2</sub>) [<a href="#B33-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">33</a>]; (<b>B</b>). K<sub>2</sub>O vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> [<a href="#B34-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">34</a>]; (<b>C</b>). A/NK vs. A/CNK [<a href="#B35-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">35</a>]. Note: A/CNK = molar ratio of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/(CaO + Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O); A/NK = molar ratio of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/(Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O). Published data are from this study and [<a href="#B26-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">26</a>,<a href="#B27-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B36-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">36</a>,<a href="#B37-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">37</a>,<a href="#B38-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">38</a>,<a href="#B39-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">39</a>,<a href="#B40-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">40</a>,<a href="#B41-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">41</a>,<a href="#B42-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">42</a>,<a href="#B43-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">43</a>,<a href="#B44-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">44</a>,<a href="#B45-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">45</a>,<a href="#B46-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">46</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (<b>A</b>), TFe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (<b>B</b>), CaO (<b>C</b>), MgO (<b>D</b>), TiO<sub>2</sub> (<b>E</b>), and P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> (<b>F</b>) vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> plots of Mesozoic granitoids from the Jiaodong Peninsula. The published data are the same as in <a href="#minerals-13-01012-f005" class="html-fig">Figure 5</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Chondrite-normalized REE patterns (<b>A</b>,<b>C</b>,<b>E</b>,<b>G</b>) and primitive mantle-normalized trace element variation diagrams (<b>B</b>,<b>D</b>,<b>F</b>,<b>H</b>) for the Jiaodong Peninsula Mesozoic granitoids. Normalizing values are from McDonough and Sun [<a href="#B47-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">47</a>]. The published data are the same as in <a href="#minerals-13-01012-f005" class="html-fig">Figure 5</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>A</b>). Sr/Y vs. Y (after Martin [<a href="#B53-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">53</a>]; Defant and Drummond [<a href="#B54-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">54</a>]); (<b>B</b>). (La/Yb)<sub>N</sub> vs. Yb<sub>N</sub> (after Martin [<a href="#B55-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">55</a>]; Drummond et al. [<a href="#B56-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">56</a>]; Martin et al. [<a href="#B57-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">57</a>]). The published data are the same as in <a href="#minerals-13-01012-f005" class="html-fig">Figure 5</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Plots of MgO (<b>A</b>), Mg# (<b>B</b>), and Ni (<b>C</b>) vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> for the Mesozoic adakitic rocks in the Jiaodong Peninsula. The published data are the same as in <a href="#minerals-13-01012-f005" class="html-fig">Figure 5</a>. Note: the subducting oceanic crust-derived adakites are from Defant and Drummond [<a href="#B54-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">54</a>], Stern and Kilian [<a href="#B65-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">65</a>], Martin [<a href="#B66-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">66</a>], Smithies [<a href="#B67-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">67</a>], and Defant et al. [<a href="#B68-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">68</a>]; the thickened lower crust-derived adakitic rocks are from Atherton and Petford [<a href="#B69-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">69</a>], Petford and Atherton [<a href="#B70-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">70</a>], Muir et al. [<a href="#B71-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">71</a>], and Smithies [<a href="#B67-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">67</a>]; the delaminated crust-derived adakitic rocks are from Xu et al. [<a href="#B72-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">72</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Plots of εNd(t) vs. (<sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr)<sub>i</sub> ratio (<b>A</b>) and SiO<sub>2</sub> vs. T-Zr (<b>B</b>) diagrams for the granites from the Jiaodong Peninsula. The published data are the same as in <a href="#minerals-13-01012-f005" class="html-fig">Figure 5</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Plots of (<b>A</b>) La vs. La/Yb, (<b>B</b>) La vs. La/Sm, (<b>C</b>) Sr/Nd vs. Th/Yb [<a href="#B73-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">73</a>], and (<b>D</b>) Nb/Y vs. Ba [<a href="#B74-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">74</a>] for the Mesozoic granites from Jiaodong Peninsula. The published data are the same as in <a href="#minerals-13-01012-f005" class="html-fig">Figure 5</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Plots of K<sub>2</sub>O/MgO (<b>A</b>), Nb (<b>B</b>), (Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O)/CaO (<b>C</b>), and TFe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/MgO (<b>D</b>) vs. 10000 Ga/Al (Whalen et al. [<a href="#B81-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">81</a>]), Nb–Y–3*Ga (<b>E</b>), and Nb–Y–Ce (<b>F</b>) (Eby [<a href="#B82-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">82</a>]) discrimination diagrams for the Laoshan suite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Sr–Rb–Ba plot for the Laoshan suite in the Jiaodong Peninsula (Qian et al. [<a href="#B83-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">83</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>(<b>A</b>). T-Ti (°C) (Ti-saturation temperature) vs. ΔFMQ; (<b>B</b>). ΔFMQ histogram; (<b>C</b>). Age (Ma) vs. ΔFMQ. Ti-saturation temperature and ΔFMQ values are calculated from zircon trace elements (<a href="#app1-minerals-13-01012" class="html-app">Table S3</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Tectonic discrimination diagrams for granitoids from the Jiaodong Peninsula. (<b>A</b>). Rb vs. (Yb + Ta) [<a href="#B98-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">98</a>]; (<b>B</b>). Rb vs. (Y + Nb); (<b>C</b>). Ta vs. Yb [<a href="#B99-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">99</a>]; (<b>D</b>). Rb/30-Hf-3*Ta [<a href="#B100-minerals-13-01012" class="html-bibr">100</a>]. Abbreviations: VAG = volcanic arc granites; ORG = ocean ridge granites; WPG = within-plate granites; syn-COLG = syn-collision granites; post-COLG = post-collision granites.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 17113 KiB  
Article
Petrogenesis of Early Cretaceous Granitoids in the Qingdao Area, Jiaodong Peninsula: Constraints from Zircon U–Pb Ages, Geochemistry and Sr–Nd–Hf Isotopes
by Yi Ding, Xuejiao Bu, Hong Zhao, Shihua Zhong and Ming Liu
Minerals 2023, 13(7), 963; https://doi.org/10.3390/min13070963 - 20 Jul 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1333
Abstract
The Jiaodong Peninsula is located on the junction of the North China Craton (NCC) and South China Block (SCB), where Mesozoic igneous rocks are widespread. However, the petrogenesis and tectonic settings for these Mesozoic igneous rocks are still controversial. In this study, we [...] Read more.
The Jiaodong Peninsula is located on the junction of the North China Craton (NCC) and South China Block (SCB), where Mesozoic igneous rocks are widespread. However, the petrogenesis and tectonic settings for these Mesozoic igneous rocks are still controversial. In this study, we present detailed geochronological and geochemical analyses of quartz monzonite, monzogranite, syenogranite, and alkali feldspar granite in the Qingdao area, east of the Jiaodong Peninsula, to constrain their petrogenesis and tectonic setting. Zircon U–Pb dating shows that they mainly formed in the Early Cretaceous (120.5–113.1 Ma). Quartz monzonite exhibits adakitic geochemical features (e.g., low Y and high Sr/Y). Combined with its Sr–Nd–Hf isotopic features, we suggest that quartz monzonite may have been produced by the partial melting of phengite-bearing eclogites at the base of the thickened continental crust of the NCC. In contrast, monzogranite and syenogranite exhibit I-type granite affinities, whereas alkali feldspar granite exhibits features consistent with A-type granite. The strongly negative εHf(t) and εNd(t) values of the I-type rocks indicate that they were most likely produced through partial melting of granitic gneisses from the NCC, whereas A-type magmas may be formed through fractional crystallization from the non-adakitic granitic magma. Combined with previous studies, we suggest that these granitoids were formed in a lithospheric extensional setting via the rollback of the subducted Paleo-Pacific slab, which resulted in the reworking of the deep crust beneath the Sulu ultrahigh-pressure metamorphic belt. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Isotope Geochemical Analysis Technology and Its Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Tectonic framework of the Jiaodong Peninsula. (<b>b</b>) Geological map and sampling location of the Qingdao granitoids.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Photomicrographs showing minerals and textures of the granitoids in the Qingdao area. (<b>a</b>) Quartz monzonite (sample QD008-1). (<b>b</b>) Monzogranite (sample QD002-3). (<b>c</b>) Syenogranite (sample QD016-1). (<b>d</b>) Alkali feldspar granite (sample QD005-3). Abbreviations: Qtz-quartz; Kfs—K-feldspar; Pl—plagioclase; Ser—sericite; Bt—biotite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>CL images of typical zircons from the Qingdao granitoids. The numbers adjacent to circles refer to the zircon <sup>206</sup>Pb/<sup>238</sup>U ages (Ma) and ε<sub>Hf</sub>(t) values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Concordia diagram of zircon U–Pb dating results for the Qingdao granitoids. The ages in the diagram refer to the weighted mean <sup>206</sup>Pb/<sup>238</sup>U ages (Ma).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>K<sub>2</sub>O vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> diagrams for the Qingdao granitoids (modified after [<a href="#B20-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">20</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Total alkalis vs. Silica (modified after [<a href="#B21-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">21</a>]) and (<b>b</b>) A/NK vs. A/CNK (modified after [<a href="#B22-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">22</a>]) diagrams.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>REE and trace element diagrams for the granitoids in the Qingdao area. (<b>a</b>) Chondrite-normalized REE diagrams for all studied samples. (<b>b</b>–<b>e</b>) Individual chondrite-normalized REE diagrams for quartz monzonite, monzogranite, syeogranite and alkali feldspar granite samples, respectively. (<b>f</b>) Primitive mantle-normalized trace element diagrams for all studied samples. (<b>g</b>–<b>j</b>) Primitive mantle-normalized trace element diagrams for quartz monzonite, monzogranite, syeogranite and alkali feldspar granite samples, respectively. The chondrite REE and primitive mantle normalization values are from [<a href="#B24-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">24</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Variation diagrams of (<b>a</b>) 10,000 × Ga/Al vs. FeO<sup>T</sup>/MgO and (<b>b</b>) Zr + Ce + Nb + Y vs. (Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O)/CaO for the Qingdao granitoids (modified after [<a href="#B31-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">31</a>]. FG: Fractionated granites; OGT: Unfractionated I-, S-, and M-type granites).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Sr/Y vs. Y diagram for the Qingdao granitoids. The literature data sources are from [<a href="#B11-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">11</a>,<a href="#B15-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">15</a>,<a href="#B17-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">17</a>]. The solid line indicates the Adakite range, and the dotted line indicates the ADR range. The black lines are from [<a href="#B35-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">35</a>]. The blue lines are from [<a href="#B34-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">34</a>], and the orange lines are from [<a href="#B32-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">32</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Plots of trace elements vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> for the Qingdao granitoids. The literature data sources are from [<a href="#B11-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">11</a>,<a href="#B15-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">15</a>,<a href="#B17-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">17</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>(<sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr)<sub>I</sub> vs. ε<sub>Nd</sub>(t) for the Qingdao granitoids (modified after [<a href="#B30-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">30</a>]). The ages for quartz monzogranite and monzogranite are 120.5 Ma and 119.4 Ma, respectively, which are used to calculate the (<sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr)<sub>I</sub> and ε<sub>Nd</sub>(t). The literature data sources are from [<a href="#B11-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">11</a>,<a href="#B15-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">15</a>,<a href="#B17-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">17</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Plots of major and trace elements vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> for the Qingdao granitoids. The literature data sources are from [<a href="#B11-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">11</a>,<a href="#B15-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">15</a>,<a href="#B17-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">17</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Ba vs. Sr plot (modified after [<a href="#B52-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">52</a>]. Pl: plagioclase; Kfs: K-feldspar; Bt: biotite; Hbl: hornblende).</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Zircon Hf isotope diagrams. (<b>a</b>) Variations of Hf isotopic data with time for depleted mantle and crust. (<b>b</b>) Inserted diagram in a showing the zircon Hf isotopic features for granitoids from the Qingdao area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>(<b>a</b>) Yb/Ta vs. Y/Nb and (<b>b</b>) Y/Nb vs. Ce/Nb diagrams for A-type granite (modified after [<a href="#B57-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">57</a>]. OIB = ocean island basalt; IAB = island arc basalt).</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Correlograms for trace elements ratios of the Qingdao granitoids. The literature data sources are from [<a href="#B11-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">11</a>,<a href="#B15-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">15</a>,<a href="#B17-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">17</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Tectonic model for the generation and emplacement of the Qingdao granitoids.</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 8398 KiB  
Article
Outboard Onset of Ross Orogen Magmatism and Subsequent Igneous and Metamorphic Cooling Linked to Slab Rollback during Late-Stage Gondwana Assembly
by Timothy Paulsen, John Encarnación, Anne Grunow, Jeffrey Benowitz, Paul Layer, Chad Deering and Jakub Sliwinski
Geosciences 2023, 13(4), 126; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13040126 - 21 Apr 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2101
Abstract
Changes in magmatism and sedimentation along the late Neoproterozoic-early Paleozoic Ross orogenic belt in Antarctica have been linked to the cessation of convergence along the Mozambique belt during the assembly of East-West Gondwana. However, these interpretations are non-unique and are based, in part, [...] Read more.
Changes in magmatism and sedimentation along the late Neoproterozoic-early Paleozoic Ross orogenic belt in Antarctica have been linked to the cessation of convergence along the Mozambique belt during the assembly of East-West Gondwana. However, these interpretations are non-unique and are based, in part, on limited thermochronological data sets spread out along large sectors of the East Antarctic margin. We report new 40Ar/39Ar hornblende, muscovite, and biotite age data for plutonic (n = 13) and metasedimentary (n = 3) samples from the Shackleton–Liv Glacier sector of the Queen Maud Mountains in Antarctica. Cumulative 40Ar/39Ar age data show polymodal age peaks (510 Ma, 491 Ma, 475 Ma) that lag peaks in U-Pb igneous crystallization ages, suggesting igneous and metamorphic cooling following magmatism within the region. The 40Ar/39Ar ages are similar to ages in other sectors of the Ross orogen, but younger than detrital mineral 40Ar/39Ar cooling ages indicative of older magmatism and cooling of unexposed inboard areas along the margin. Detrital zircon trace element abundances suggest that the widespread onset of magmatism in outboard localities of the orogen correlates with a ~560–530 Ma decrease in crustal thickness. The timing of crustal thinning recorded by zircon in magmas overlaps with other evidence for the timing of crustal extension, suggesting that the regional onset of magmatism with subsequent igneous and metamorphic cooling probably reflects slab rollback that coincided with possible global plate motion changes induced during the final assembly of Gondwana. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Gondwana reconstruction (~500 Ma) showing the Ross–Delamerian orogen within the greater latest Neoproterozoic to late Paleozoic Terra Australis orogen along the paleo-Pacific margin of Gondwana, as well as the major Precambrian cratons and mobile belts of Gondwana. Inset shows Gondwana within Pangea reconstruction (~250 Ma). Figure modified from [<a href="#B11-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">11</a>,<a href="#B12-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">12</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Simplified geologic map showing intrusive, volcanic, sedimentary, and metamorphic basement rocks of the Ross orogen and unconformably overlying Beacon Supergroup from the south Victoria Land to the south through the Queen Maud and Horlick mountains. There are abundant volcanic rocks in the early to middle Cambrian stratigraphic packages (i.e., the Liv Group) in the Queen Maud Mountains, whereas the early to middle Cambrian stratigraphic packages (i.e., the Byrd group) in the central Transantarctic Mountains are practically devoid of volcanic rocks. The boundary separating the Liv Group from the Byrd Group occurs west of Shackleton Glacier. Inset shows the location of the Transantarctic Mountains (the black area is the Ross orogen). Abbreviations: PM, Pensacola Mountains; TM, Thiel Mountains. Figure compiled and modified from others [<a href="#B16-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">16</a>,<a href="#B17-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">17</a>,<a href="#B18-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">18</a>,<a href="#B19-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">19</a>,<a href="#B20-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">20</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Schematic diagram summarizing the geology of the major rock packages found at outboard localities in the Queen Maud and central Transantarctic Mountains with respect to those found at inboard localities in the Miller Range and south Victoria Land. Ages and metamorphic conditions from sources provided in text.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Simplified map showing the bedrock sample localities and geology in the Ramsey, Shackleton, and Liv Glacier areas (modified from [<a href="#B18-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">18</a>]. White circles show localities of metasedimentary and intrusive rock samples analyzed herein using <sup>40</sup>Ar/<sup>39</sup>Ar method. Black circles show locations of previous <sup>40</sup>Ar/<sup>39</sup>Ar analyses of intrusive rocks and sedimentary rocks reported in [<a href="#B45-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">45</a>,<a href="#B48-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">48</a>,<a href="#B51-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">51</a>,<a href="#B54-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">54</a>]. The Cambria–Ordovician Starshot Formation in the Ramsey Glacier area was originally mapped as Goldie Formation but shown as Starshot Formation after [<a href="#B37-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">37</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p><sup>40</sup>Ar/<sup>39</sup>Ar incremental release spectra for hornblende (Hbl), muscovite (Ms), and biotite (Bt) mineral separates from metasedimentary rocks samples from the Duncan Mountains and Mount Wasko. Vertical axes represent age (Ma), and horizontal axes represent cumulative percent of <sup>39</sup>Ar released. Ages in the figure are reported at the ±1-sigma level but are reported at the ±2-sigma level in the text for the sake of comparison to other geochronological constraints. Steps filled in grey were used for plateau and weighted average age determinations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p><sup>40</sup>Ar/<sup>39</sup>Ar incremental release spectra for hornblende (Hbl) and biotite (Bt) mineral separates from foliated intrusive rock sample in the study area. Vertical axes represent age (Ma), and horizontal axes represent cumulative percent of <sup>39</sup>Ar released. Ages in the figure are reported at the ±1-sigma level but are reported at the ±2-sigma level in the text for the sake of comparison to other geochronological constraints. Steps filled in grey were used for plateau and weighted average age determinations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p><sup>40</sup>Ar/<sup>39</sup>Ar incremental release spectra for hornblende (Hbl) and biotite (Bt) mineral separates from unfoliated intrusive rock sample in the study area. Vertical axes represent age (Ma) and horizontal axes represent cumulative percent of <sup>39</sup>Ar released. Ages in the figure are reported at the ±1-sigma level but are reported at the ±2-sigma level in the text for the sake of comparison to other geochronological constraints. Steps filled in grey were used for plateau and weighted average age determinations. Uncertainty ellipses filled in red were the steps used for isochron age determination.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p><sup>40</sup>Ar/<sup>39</sup>Ar thermochronological data illustrating the cooling histories of metasedimentary (diamond) and foliated/pretectonic (open) and unfoliated (filled) intrusive rocks (squares) with respect to U-Pb detrital zircon maximum depositional ages and U-Pb zircon crystallization ages for intrusive (squares) and volcanic (triangles) rocks in (<b>A</b>) Duncan Mountains, (<b>B</b>) upper Shackleton Glacier, (<b>C</b>) lower Shackleton Glacier areas, and (<b>D</b>) Gabbro Hills. Vertical axes represent temperature (T) and horizontal axes are age (Ma). Zircon U-Pb age data are plotted along, above, and below the 900 °C U-Pb closure temperature for clarity. <sup>40</sup>Ar/<sup>39</sup>Ar nominal closure temperatures are taken to be 540 °C (hornblende, Hbl.; [<a href="#B68-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">68</a>]), 450 °C (muscovite, Ms.; [<a href="#B69-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">69</a>]), and 375 °C (biotite, Bt.; [<a href="#B70-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">70</a>]). Arrows connect symbols for ages from different minerals from the same samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Stacked kernel-density-estimation diagrams [<a href="#B73-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">73</a>] showing in situ igneous and metamorphic <sup>40</sup>Ar/<sup>39</sup>Ar cooling ages, detrital zircon U-Pb ages, volcanic and plutonic U-Pb crystallization ages, and detrital muscovite <sup>40</sup>Ar/<sup>39</sup>Ar ages falling within the 560–460 Ma time period from the Shackleton Glacier area (Ramsey to Liv glaciers) of the Ross orogen. <sup>40</sup>Ar/<sup>39</sup>Ar age contributions from hornblende (blue circle), muscovite (red circle), and biotite (black circle) are shown above the cumulative KDE diagram for in situ igneous and metamorphic <sup>40</sup>Ar/<sup>39</sup>Ar cooling ages. In situ igneous and metamorphic <sup>40</sup>Ar/<sup>39</sup>Ar cooling ages are compiled from data presented in this paper, as well as [<a href="#B45-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">45</a>,<a href="#B46-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">46</a>,<a href="#B48-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">48</a>,<a href="#B51-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">51</a>,<a href="#B54-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">54</a>]. Detrital zircon ages are compiled for the Liv and Beardmore groups from [<a href="#B26-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">26</a>,<a href="#B27-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B54-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">54</a>]. Volcanic and plutonic U-Pb crystallization ages are compiled from data presented in [<a href="#B33-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">33</a>,<a href="#B34-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">34</a>,<a href="#B35-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">35</a>,<a href="#B36-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">36</a>,<a href="#B44-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">44</a>,<a href="#B45-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">45</a>,<a href="#B47-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">47</a>,<a href="#B48-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">48</a>]. <sup>40</sup>Ar/<sup>39</sup>Ar ages for detrital muscovite from the Starshot Formation along Ramsey Glacier are from [<a href="#B45-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">45</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Stacked kernel-density-estimation diagrams [<a href="#B73-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">73</a>] showing in situ igneous and metamorphic <sup>40</sup>Ar/<sup>39</sup>Ar cooling ages, Liv Group detrital zircon U-Pb ages, and Duncan Formation detrital zircon U-Pb ages falling within the 620–460 Ma time period from the Shackleton Glacier area (Ramsey to Liv Glaciers) of the Ross orogen. In situ igneous and metamorphic <sup>40</sup>Ar/<sup>39</sup>Ar cooling ages are compiled from data presented in this paper, as well as [<a href="#B45-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">45</a>,<a href="#B46-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">46</a>,<a href="#B48-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">48</a>,<a href="#B51-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">51</a>,<a href="#B54-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">54</a>]. Detrital zircon ages are compiled for the Liv Group and Duncan Formation from [<a href="#B26-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">26</a>,<a href="#B27-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B54-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">54</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Stacked kernel-density-estimation diagrams [<a href="#B73-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">73</a>] showing in situ igneous and metamorphic <sup>40</sup>Ar/<sup>39</sup>Ar cooling ages and igneous U-Pb crystallization ages falling within the 620–460 Ma time period from the Queen Maud Mountains, central Transantarctic Mountains, and south Victoria Land areas of the Ross orogen. <sup>40</sup>Ar/<sup>39</sup>Ar age contributions from hornblende (blue circle), muscovite (red circle), and biotite (black circle) are shown above the cumulative KDE diagram for in situ igneous and metamorphic <sup>40</sup>Ar/<sup>39</sup>Ar cooling ages. In situ igneous and metamorphic <sup>40</sup>Ar/<sup>39</sup>Ar cooling ages are compiled from data presented in this paper, as well as [<a href="#B37-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">37</a>,<a href="#B45-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">45</a>,<a href="#B46-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">46</a>,<a href="#B48-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">48</a>,<a href="#B51-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">51</a>,<a href="#B52-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">52</a>,<a href="#B54-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">54</a>,<a href="#B79-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">79</a>,<a href="#B80-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">80</a>,<a href="#B81-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">81</a>,<a href="#B82-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">82</a>,<a href="#B83-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">83</a>]. U-Pb crystallization ages from [<a href="#B33-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">33</a>,<a href="#B34-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">34</a>,<a href="#B35-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">35</a>,<a href="#B36-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">36</a>,<a href="#B37-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">37</a>,<a href="#B38-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">38</a>,<a href="#B44-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">44</a>,<a href="#B45-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">45</a>,<a href="#B46-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">46</a>,<a href="#B47-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">47</a>,<a href="#B48-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">48</a>,<a href="#B82-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">82</a>,<a href="#B84-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">84</a>,<a href="#B85-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">85</a>,<a href="#B86-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">86</a>,<a href="#B87-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">87</a>,<a href="#B88-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">88</a>,<a href="#B89-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">89</a>,<a href="#B90-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">90</a>,<a href="#B91-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">91</a>,<a href="#B92-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">92</a>,<a href="#B93-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">93</a>,<a href="#B94-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">94</a>,<a href="#B95-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">95</a>,<a href="#B96-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">96</a>,<a href="#B97-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">97</a>,<a href="#B98-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">98</a>,<a href="#B99-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">99</a>]. <sup>40</sup>Ar/<sup>39</sup>Ar cooling ages for detrital muscovite from the Starshot Formation along Ramsey Glacier are from [<a href="#B54-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">54</a>] and those within the central Transantarctic Mountains (CTAM) are from [<a href="#B37-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">37</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Photo of isoclinally folded Henson Marble Member of the Fairweather Formation in structural contact with the Duncan Formation along the Spillway Fault at Mount Henson.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Average detrital zircon Yb/Gd ratios (20 Myr time brackets) with respect to the timing of metamorphism associated with crustal thickening in south Victoria Land [<a href="#B101-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">101</a>], alkaline volcanism in south Victoria Land [<a href="#B91-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">91</a>], and decompression of ultra-high-pressure metamorphic rocks in the central Transantarctic Mountains [<a href="#B108-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">108</a>], as well as stacked kernel-density-estimation diagrams [<a href="#B73-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">73</a>] showing in situ igneous and metamorphic <sup>40</sup>Ar/<sup>39</sup>Ar cooling ages and igneous U-Pb crystallization ages falling within the 620–460 Ma time period in the Ross orogenic belt from South Victoria Land through the Queen Maud Mountains. Note that the zircon Yb/Gd ratio decreases upwards correlating with increasing crustal thickness. Detrital zircon Yb/Gd data include all zircons regardless of concordance with Th/U &gt; 0.1 (~igneous proxy) and Th, U, Y, Yb, and Gd values &gt; 0. Interpreted zircon ages are <sup>206</sup>Pb/<sup>238</sup>U ages for grains with <sup>206</sup>Pb/<sup>207</sup>Pb ages &lt; 1500 Ma. <sup>40</sup>Ar/<sup>39</sup>Ar cooling ages are compiled from data presented in this paper, as well as [<a href="#B37-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">37</a>,<a href="#B45-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">45</a>,<a href="#B46-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">46</a>,<a href="#B48-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">48</a>,<a href="#B51-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">51</a>,<a href="#B52-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">52</a>,<a href="#B54-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">54</a>,<a href="#B79-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">79</a>,<a href="#B80-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">80</a>,<a href="#B81-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">81</a>,<a href="#B82-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">82</a>,<a href="#B83-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">83</a>]. U-Pb igneous crystallization ages are presented in [<a href="#B33-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">33</a>,<a href="#B34-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">34</a>,<a href="#B35-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">35</a>,<a href="#B36-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">36</a>,<a href="#B37-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">37</a>,<a href="#B38-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">38</a>,<a href="#B44-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">44</a>,<a href="#B45-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">45</a>,<a href="#B46-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">46</a>,<a href="#B47-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">47</a>,<a href="#B48-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">48</a>,<a href="#B82-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">82</a>,<a href="#B84-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">84</a>,<a href="#B85-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">85</a>,<a href="#B86-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">86</a>,<a href="#B87-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">87</a>,<a href="#B88-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">88</a>,<a href="#B89-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">89</a>,<a href="#B90-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">90</a>,<a href="#B91-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">91</a>,<a href="#B92-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">92</a>,<a href="#B93-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">93</a>,<a href="#B94-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">94</a>,<a href="#B95-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">95</a>,<a href="#B96-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">96</a>,<a href="#B97-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">97</a>,<a href="#B98-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">98</a>,<a href="#B99-geosciences-13-00126" class="html-bibr">99</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Schematic tectonic model for the Queen Maud Mountain–south Victoria Land sector of the paleo-Pacific margin of Gondwana. The upper figure broadly corresponds to the earlier time (~late Neoproterozoic-early Cambrian) of crustal thickening indicated in <a href="#geosciences-13-00126-f013" class="html-fig">Figure 13</a>, whereas the lower figure corresponds to the later time (~Cambrian) of crustal thinning, possibly due to extension related to slab rollback.</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 20567 KiB  
Article
Tectonometamorphic Evolution of the Migmatitic Paragneisses of the Filali Unit (Internal Rif, Morocco)
by Abdelkhaleq Afiri, Abderrahim Essaifi, Ali Charroud, Mourad Aqnouy, Kamal Abdelrahman, Amar Alali and Mohamed Abioui
Minerals 2023, 13(4), 484; https://doi.org/10.3390/min13040484 - 30 Mar 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2461
Abstract
A lithosphere-scale extensional shear zone juxtaposes an underlying sub-continental peridotite body and overlying migmatitic paragneisses of the Filali unit in the Beni Bousera massif (Internal Rif, Morocco). Three stages are recognized in the metamorphic evolution of the aluminous paragneiss, marked by the chemical [...] Read more.
A lithosphere-scale extensional shear zone juxtaposes an underlying sub-continental peridotite body and overlying migmatitic paragneisses of the Filali unit in the Beni Bousera massif (Internal Rif, Morocco). Three stages are recognized in the metamorphic evolution of the aluminous paragneiss, marked by the chemical zoning of garnet porphyroblasts and the evolution of associated mineral assemblages characterized by the presence of kyanite and rutile (M1), sillimanite, k-feldspar and melt (M2), and cordierite (M3). Phase-equilibrium modeling (pseudosections) and multi-equilibrium thermobarometry point to P-T conditions of 7 kbar 750 °C and 3.5 kbar 685 °C for the M2 and M3 stages, respectively. M1 conditions of 9.3 kbar 660 °C were inferred using modeling after the reintegration of melt lost during M2 into the bulk composition. Published geochronological data suggest a Variscan age (250–340 Ma) for the M1 event, whereas M2 and M3 are Oligo-Miocene and related to the Alpine orogeny. The recorded sub-isothermal decompression is related to significant crustal attenuation in the Oligo-Miocene and is responsible for the juxtaposition of the hot asthenospheric mantle and the crustal units, causing the melting of the paragneiss. The exhumation of the gneisses by crustal extension is associated with the westward retreat of an Alpine subduction (slab rollback). Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geologic map of the Alboran domain in the Betic-Rif arc with the major tectonic features, modified after Do Couto et al. [<a href="#B1-minerals-13-00484" class="html-bibr">1</a>]. (<b>a</b>) Location of the studied mountain belt within the Gibraltar arc. (<b>b</b>) Detailed geologic and tectonic map of the chain, centered on the Rif and zooming on the Internal zones, with the location of the investigated area (open red box). ODP sites 976 to 979, DSDP site 121, and all industrial wells are also located offshore (And G1 = Andalucía-G1; Alb A1 = Alborán-A1; And A1 = Andalucía-A1). AR = Alboran ridge; AI = Alboran Island; EAB = Eastern Alboran Basin; SAB = South Alboran Basin; WAB = western Alboran Basin; XB = Xauen bank; YF = Yusuf fault.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Geologic and tectonic map of the studied area (the Beni Bousera peridotites and the overlying crustal rocks: granulite and Filali units) showing the main directions of the S2 foliation and stretching lineation. Foliation data are indicated by black symbols and lineation data are represented by black lines with arrows. The figure shows stereoplots, lower-hemisphere equal-area projections of structural data, of the poles of the plane foliation and lineation in the peridotites (i), in the granulite (ii), and in the Filali unit (iii), modified after Afiri et al. [<a href="#B33-minerals-13-00484" class="html-bibr">33</a>], Reuber et al. [<a href="#B40-minerals-13-00484" class="html-bibr">40</a>] and El Bakili et al. [<a href="#B54-minerals-13-00484" class="html-bibr">54</a>]. (<b>b</b>) NW–SE cross-section showing that the contact between the Beni Bousera peridotites and crustal rocks consists of a lithospheric scale extensional shear zone.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Field photographs showing different geometric relationships between partial melting and main schistosity S2 in the migmatitic paragneisses of the Filali unit. (<b>a</b>) Granitic leucosomes parallel to S2 schistosity. (<b>b</b>) Aplitic veins oriented parallel to the main schistosity S2. (<b>c</b>) Asymmetrical P2 folds overturned to the NW deforming leucosomes. (<b>d</b>) Top to the NW shear bands. (<b>e</b>) Metabasic levels intercalated in migmatitic paragneisses, boudinaged and surrounded by the main foliation S2. (<b>f</b>) Alternating leucosomes and melanosomes; leucosomes are boudinaged, stretched, and parallel to the regional foliation S2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Crystallization/deformation relationships in the migmatitic paragneisses of the Filali unit. (<b>a</b>) Two types of garnets are perfectly recognizable: porphyroblasts wrapped by the biotite–sillimanite main schistosity S2 containing inclusion trails of quartz and biotite (S1); small garnets dispersed in a bed of quartz and k-feldspar and slightly wrapped by sillimanite and biotite; garnet porphyroblasts (g1), and garnet with a small size (g2). (<b>b</b>) Pre-S2 kyanite porphyroclasts wrapped by the biotite–sillimanite foliation. (<b>c</b>) Transformation of a second-generation garnet (g2) into cordierite and sillimanite. (<b>d</b>) Foliation S2, defined by biotite and sillimanite, is folded. (<b>e</b>) Late-S2 Subhedral andalusite porphyroblast includes plagioclase and muscovite inclusions. (<b>f</b>) Garnet shows a core (g1), separated by an optical (and chemical) discontinuity from a peripheral zone (g2). Schistosity S2, composed of sillimanite, biotite, and garnet 2, parallel to thin leucosomes, wraps around large crystals of garnet 1, surrounded by rims of garnet 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Temporal relationship between metamorphism and deformation in the migmatitic paragneisses of the Filali unit. The figure also shows the main mineralogical assemblages representative of both S1 and S2 schistosities in this rock.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>X-ray mapping of garnet from the migmatitic paragneisses of the Filali unit. (<b>a</b>) CaO, (<b>b</b>) MgO, (<b>c</b>) MnO, and (<b>d</b>) FeO mapping. Note that the “warm” colors indicate high concentrations and the “cold” colors indicate low concentrations. The white line in (<b>b</b>) refers to the location of the garnet compositional profile shown in <a href="#minerals-13-00484-f007" class="html-fig">Figure 7</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Chemical zoning profile of garnet from the migmatitic paragneisses of the Filali unit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>T-X<sub>H<sub>2</sub>O</sub> pseudosection calculated at 6.5 kbar in the MnNCKFMASHTO chemical system, with calculated compositional isopleths of the grossular (Grs) content of garnet used for determining the bulk H<sub>2</sub>O content. The observed syn-thermal peak assemblage (g bi pl ksp sill ilm ru q) is stable just above the solidus for X<sub>H<sub>2</sub>O</sub> values ranging from 0.34 to 0.66 mol.%. Red dashed line: solidus. Pink dashed line: selected X<sub>H<sub>2</sub>O</sub> (0.58) value.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>P-T pseudosection calculated using the MnNCKFMASHTO chemical system with the measured bulk composition (SEM-EDS) of migmatitic paragneisses with the proposed prograde P-T path (the red line with arrow). The red thick dashed line is the solidus; the blue, brown, and pink thin dashed lines correspond to the isopleths of the grossular (Grs) content of garnet, the y(bi) in biotite, and melt, respectively. The red bold fonts refer to the observed syn-thermal peak mineral assemblage. The semitransparent blue and yellow circles marked by numbers refer to the syn-thermal peak and retrograde metamorphic P-T conditions constrained by the observed mineral assemblages and the mineral composition isopleths. The black full line with an arrow represents the P-T path of the rock. See text for further details.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>P-T pseudosection constructed in the MnNCKFMASHTO chemical system using the software THERMOCALC, with the melt-reintegrated bulk compositions with 6 mol.% added melt. The blue dashed line is the H<sub>2</sub>O-saturated solidus. The red bold fonts refer to the observed early metamorphic peak and syn-thermal peak mineral assemblages. The bulk composition (in mol.%) was calculated with the addition of 6 mol.% melt into the original migmatitic paragneisses composition (<a href="#minerals-13-00484-f009" class="html-fig">Figure 9</a>) and is given above the pseudosection. The dashed bold red line represents the solidus. The red and green dashed lines represent isopleths of the spessartine (Sps) content of garnet and y(bi) in biotite, respectively. The semitransparent blue and yellow circles, marked with numbers 1, 2, and 3, refer to the P-T conditions of the early metamorphic peak, syn-thermal peak, and retrograde assemblages, respectively, constrained by the composition isopleths of garnet and biotite. See text for further details.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Metamorphic P-T path of the migmatitic paragneisses of the Filali unit. The P-T conditions demonstrate that the migmatitic paragneisses underwent three major tectonic metamorphic events, MP-MHT (M1), MP-HT (M2), and LP-HT (M3). The semitransparent circles, marked with numbers, refer to the P-T conditions of the early metamorphic peak, syn-thermal peak, and retrograde assemblages. The obtained retrograde path suggests a clockwise P-T path and a sub-isothermal decompression followed by cooling. See text for further details.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Summary diagram of the different pressure–temperature–time (P-T-t) paths, as well as geochronological data, of peridotite emplacement, tectonometamorphic events of the entire Alboran domain units in Beni Bousera (BB), and Ronda, modified from Melchiorre et al. [<a href="#B16-minerals-13-00484" class="html-bibr">16</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Synthetic geodynamic scenario for the emplacement of the Beni Bousera peridotite and the overlying crustal units of the Alboran domain, based on this study together with previous studies; (<b>a</b>) Permo-carboniferous: crustal thickening/shortening; (<b>b</b>) Early Jurassic: highly extended crust and upper mantle; (<b>c</b>) Upper Eocene–Oligocene; (<b>d</b>) Upper Oligocene–Early Miocene. See text for more details.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 6617 KiB  
Article
Three-Dimensional Lithospheric Electrical Structure beneath the Handan-Xingtai District, North China: Implications for Tectonic Control of Skarn-Iron Mineralization
by Han Zheng, Yaotian Yin, Sheng Jin, Wenbo Wei, Liuyang Xu, Ping Qi, Hongye Wang and Qingyu Wang
Minerals 2023, 13(1), 14; https://doi.org/10.3390/min13010014 - 22 Dec 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2038
Abstract
In this study, we determined the lithospheric electrical structure beneath the Handan-Xingtai district and its adjacent regions using magnetotelluric sounding data. To the west of the Handan-Xingtai district, the crust and upper mantle beneath the Taihang Mountains are mainly characterized by high resistivity [...] Read more.
In this study, we determined the lithospheric electrical structure beneath the Handan-Xingtai district and its adjacent regions using magnetotelluric sounding data. To the west of the Handan-Xingtai district, the crust and upper mantle beneath the Taihang Mountains are mainly characterized by high resistivity (>1000 Ωm, which we interpreted to be the relic cratonic lithosphere. In contrast, the lithosphere beneath the North China Plain to the east shows high-conductivity features (<100 Ωm) overall, which may indicate that it has suffered significant modifications. Additionally, other geological and geophysical studies suggested that this district was located in a significant boundary zone where the lithospheric thickness, temperature and geochemistry properties sharply changed. Combined with our resistivity model, we attributed this to the different degrees of lithospheric modification. Specifically, since the late Mesozoic, the subduction, roll-back and dehydration of the Pacific slab caused an unsteady asthenospheric flow and upwelling; therefore, the deep-derived melts and fluids concentrated within the uppermost mantle had even underplated or intruded into the crust, while this process had a negligible effect on the Taihang Mountains. Small-scale mantle convection and upwelling are likely to occur in this kind of transfer zone of lithospherice properties, leading to mantle-derived melts and fluids transporting upwardly near the surface, which was confirmed by the significantly enhanced conductivity beneath the ore district in our resistivity model. During this process, Fe derived from mantle-source magma or relic Precambrian metamorphic basement beneath the Taihang Mountains was extracted and emplaced along with the Yanshanian magmatism. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) A simplified map of the North China Craton and adjacent regions showing the distribution of late Mesozoic granitoid intrusions and major districts hosting large iron-skarn and iron oxide-apatite deposits (modified from [<a href="#B9-minerals-13-00014" class="html-bibr">9</a>,<a href="#B10-minerals-13-00014" class="html-bibr">10</a>]; (<b>b</b>) Geological sketch map of the research area (modified from [<a href="#B10-minerals-13-00014" class="html-bibr">10</a>,<a href="#B11-minerals-13-00014" class="html-bibr">11</a>,<a href="#B12-minerals-13-00014" class="html-bibr">12</a>,<a href="#B13-minerals-13-00014" class="html-bibr">13</a>,<a href="#B14-minerals-13-00014" class="html-bibr">14</a>]), showing the distribution of dioritic and monzonitic intrusions related nonferrous metal deposits. Most Fe deposits occur near the Taihang Mountains. MT site locations of the profile used in this study are also shown.1—fault; 2—buried fault; 3—basement liniment; 4—Pliocene-Quaternary; 5—Plain deposit; 6—Neogene red clay; 7—Mesozoic intrusive; 8—Cenozoic basalts; 9—gold deposits; 10—MT sites; 11—iron deposits; 12—North–South Gravity Lineament; 13—HXD. Abbreviations: OB—Ordos Basin; LLM—Lüliang Mountain; WHB—Weihe Basin; TYB—Taiyuan Basin; QSD—Qinshui Depression; THM—Taihang Mountain; NCP—North China Plain; HXD—Handan-Xingtai district; TLF—Tancheng-Lujiang fault zone.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Typical apparent resistivity, phase curves and tippers for 4 sub-regions of the research area. (<b>a</b>) Locations of MT sites from 4 sub-regions. (<b>b</b>–<b>e</b>) show the typical curves from the Taiyuan Basin (TYB), Taihang Mountain (THM), and North China Plain (NCP), respectively. It’s notable that the impedance tensors for 2D inversion were rotated to a uniform strike direction, i.e., N45°E, while the impedance components for 3D inversion were unrotated.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Geoelectric strike direction, phase tensor and real induction arrows for different period bands. Strike directions are shown as rose diagrams for three different zones of MT sites according to geographical locations, with red-blue sectors illustrating the inherent 90° ambiguity. Phase tensor ellipses are shaded according to skew value β. The induction vectors are plotted in the Parkinson convention, pointing towards conductors. The superposed tectonic features are the same as those in <a href="#minerals-13-00014-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>b.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Horizontal slices of 3D inversion model at depths of 5, 10, 20, 30 and40 km, respectively. The superposed tectonic features are the same as in <a href="#minerals-13-00014-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>b. The white triangles demonstrate the locations of MT sites. Warm and cold colors indicate low and high resistivity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Vertical slices of both 2D and 3D inversion models along the transect P1 are shown in <a href="#minerals-13-00014-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a>. (<b>a</b>) 2D inversion model;(<b>b</b>) 3D inversion model. Abbreviations: LLM—Lüliang Mountain; TYB—Taiyuan Basin; QSD—Qinshui Depression; THM—Taihang Mountain; NCP—North China Plain. R1–R3 represent major high-resistivity zones. C1–C4 indicates major conductors. The Moho depth was plotted according to a previous seismic survey [<a href="#B25-minerals-13-00014" class="html-bibr">25</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) General geological interpretation for the vertical slice of the 3D inversion model along P1 in <a href="#minerals-13-00014-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a>. (<b>b</b>) An integrated 3D sketch diagram illustrating possible metallogenic mechanisms of the HXD inferred from the crustal and upper mantle electrical structure derived from this research. The deep structure (&gt;80 km) in (<b>b</b>) was determined or modified according to previous studies [<a href="#B26-minerals-13-00014" class="html-bibr">26</a>,<a href="#B27-minerals-13-00014" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B49-minerals-13-00014" class="html-bibr">49</a>], while the shallower part of this sketch is mainly based on the geological interpretation in (<b>a</b>).</p>
Full article ">
33 pages, 7019 KiB  
Article
Petrogenesis and Tectonic Implications of Late Carboniferous Intrusions in the Tuwu-Yandong Porphyry Cu Belt (NW China): Constraints from Geochronology, Geochemistry and Sr–Nd–Hf Isotopes
by Weicai An, Chunji Xue, Yun Zhao, Chao Li, Dengfeng Xu and Bo Chen
Minerals 2022, 12(12), 1573; https://doi.org/10.3390/min12121573 - 7 Dec 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1830
Abstract
The Tuwu-Yandong porphyry Cu belt is located on the southern margin of the Dananhu island arc in eastern Tianshan, constituting the largest Cu metallogenic belt in Northwest China. Two episodes (~334 Ma and ~317 Ma) of porphyry Cu-Mo mineralization in the belt have [...] Read more.
The Tuwu-Yandong porphyry Cu belt is located on the southern margin of the Dananhu island arc in eastern Tianshan, constituting the largest Cu metallogenic belt in Northwest China. Two episodes (~334 Ma and ~317 Ma) of porphyry Cu-Mo mineralization in the belt have been recognized, associated with Early and Late Carboniferous felsic intrusions, respectively. The Carboniferous intrusions, therefore, provide a unique opportunity to investigate tectono-magmatic-metallogenic evolution of the belt. New LA–ICP–MS zircon U–Pb dating indicates that the mineralization-related and post-mineralization intrusions (granodiorite porphyry, gabbro, and granite porphyry) were formed at 321.8 ± 3.1 Ma, 313.5 ± 1.2 Ma, and 309.8 ± 2.5 Ma, respectively. The zircon trace element shows that the granodiorite porphyry (Ce4+/Ce3+ ratios, avg. 129, median = 112, n = 15) was likely derived from a more oxidized (and hydrous) magma source than that of the gabbro (Ce4+/Ce3+ ratios, avg. 74, median = 40, n = 15) and granite porphyry (Ce4+/Ce3+ ratios, avg. 100, median = 91, n = 15), being favorable for porphyry copper mineralization. The granodiorite porphyry shows an adakitic affinity (e.g., high Sr/Y ratios and low Y contents) and has high εNd(t) (6.4–6.7), εHf(t) (11.4–14.3), and Mg# values (47.4–58.1) and low (87Sr/86Sr)i (0.703804–0.703953), suggesting that the melt was derived from partial melting of a subducted oceanic slab followed by mantle peridotite interaction. The gabbro exhibits higher Al2O3 (16.5–17.4 wt.%), Cr (107–172 ppm), and Ni (37–77 ppm) contents and εNd(t) (6.6–7.2), εHf(t) (11.6–15.9), and Mg # (53.3–59.9) values, while it has lower (87Sr/86Sr)i values (0.703681–0.703882) than the granodiorite porphyry, indicating a depleted mantle source. The granite porphyry exhibits an affinity with non-fractionated I-type granites and possesses higher SiO2 (71.1–72.0 wt.%) contents, lower but positive εNd(t) (4.8–5.2), εHf(t) (10.3–13.0), and Mg # (38.7–41.0) values, and higher (87Sr/86Sr)i (0.704544–0.704998) than the granodiorite porphyry and gabbro, together with young Nd and Hf model ages, suggesting that the parental magmas originated from the partial melting of a juvenile lower crust. The enrichment in LREEs and LILEs (e.g., Ba, U, K and Sr) and depletion in HFSEs (e.g., Nb, Ta, and Ti) indicate that these intrusive rocks formed in the subduction zone. With the integration of previous studies, it can be inferred that the northward flat subduction of the Kangguer ocean slab at ca. 335–315 Ma caused the formation of the adakites and associated porphyry Cu mineralization in the Tuwu-Yandong belt. After the prolonged flat subduction, slab rollback may have occurred at ca. 314–310 Ma, followed by a “quiet period” before the final closure of the ancient Tianshan Ocean along the Kangguer Fault in this belt. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Schematic map showing the distribution of major porphyry Cu–(Mo)–(Au) deposits in the Central Asian Orogenic Belt (CAOB; modified from [<a href="#B4-minerals-12-01573" class="html-bibr">4</a>]). (<b>b</b>) Tectonic framework and distribution of deposits in the eastern Tianshan (modified from [<a href="#B28-minerals-12-01573" class="html-bibr">28</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Regional geology and distribution of porphyry Cu deposits in the Tuwu-Yandong belt, eastern Tianshan (modified from unpublished map of geology, minerals, and comprehensive anomaly of the Tuwu-Chihu Belt, 2003, drawn by Xinjiang Institute of Geological Survey).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Field, hand specimen, and microscope photos of magmatic intrusions in the Tuwu-Yandong area. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Hand specimen of the granodiorite porphyry. (<b>c</b>) Photomicrograph of the granodiorite porphyry, showing plagioclase, quartz, and biotite phenocrysts under cross-polarized light. (<b>d</b>) Hand specimen of the gabbro. (<b>e</b>) The gabbro comprised of plagioclase, pyroxene, and amphibole under plane-polarized light. (<b>f</b>) The granite porphyry intruded into CQ<sub>2</sub>. (<b>g</b>) Hand specimen of the granite porphyry. (<b>h</b>) Photomicrograph of the granite porphyry, showing plagioclase, K-feldspar, and quartz phenocrysts under cross-polarized light. Abbreviations: CQ<sub>2</sub>, unit 2 of the Qi’eshan Group; Qtz, quartz; Pl, plagioclase; Bt, biotite; Px, pyroxene; Amp, amphibole; Kf, K-feldspar.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Classification and series diagrams of Late Carboniferous intrusions in the Tuwu-Yandong porphyry Cu Belt. (<b>a</b>) Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> plot diagram [<a href="#B46-minerals-12-01573" class="html-bibr">46</a>]. (<b>b</b>) K<sub>2</sub>O vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> diagram [<a href="#B47-minerals-12-01573" class="html-bibr">47</a>]. (<b>c</b>) AFM diagram (A = Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O, F = FeOt, M = MgO). The boundary between the tholeiite and the calc-alkaline series is from [<a href="#B48-minerals-12-01573" class="html-bibr">48</a>]. (<b>d</b>) A/NK vs. A/CNK plot diagram [<a href="#B49-minerals-12-01573" class="html-bibr">49</a>]. The data from previous studies can be found in <a href="#app1-minerals-12-01573" class="html-app">Supplementary Table S1</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Chondrite-normalized REE and (<b>b</b>) primitive mantle-normalized trace element abundance spider diagram of the Carboniferous intrusions in the Tuwu-Yandong porphyry Cu Belt (normalization values are from [<a href="#B50-minerals-12-01573" class="html-bibr">50</a>,<a href="#B51-minerals-12-01573" class="html-bibr">51</a>]). The N-MORB, E-MORB, and OIB patterns are from [<a href="#B51-minerals-12-01573" class="html-bibr">51</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Sr/Y vs. Y diagram (after [<a href="#B52-minerals-12-01573" class="html-bibr">52</a>]); (<b>b</b>) Mg <sup>#</sup> vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> diagram (after [<a href="#B10-minerals-12-01573" class="html-bibr">10</a>]). The data from previous studies and the data on the Early Carboniferous ore-related adakites can be found in <a href="#app1-minerals-12-01573" class="html-app">Supplementary Table S1</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Cathodoluminescence images of representative zircon grains showing the inner structures and analyzed locations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) <sup>206</sup>Pb/<sup>238</sup>U vs. <sup>207</sup>Pb/<sup>235</sup>U concordia diagrams and (<b>d</b>) Th/U vs. age diagram of zircons for the intrusive rocks.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Chondrite-normalized REE patterns for the zircons from the granodiorite porphyry (<b>a</b>), gabbro (<b>b</b>), granite porphyry (<b>c</b>), and previously studied intrusive rocks (<b>d</b>) in the Tuwu-Yandong belt. The chondrite values are from [<a href="#B51-minerals-12-01573" class="html-bibr">51</a>]. The data for the diorite, plagiogranite porphyry, quartz albite porphyry, and quartz porphyry of the Tuwu-Yandong deposits are from [<a href="#B10-minerals-12-01573" class="html-bibr">10</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>(<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) εHf(t) vs. age (Ma) diagrams, (<b>c</b>) εNd(t) vs. (<sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr)<sub>i</sub> diagram (after [<a href="#B5-minerals-12-01573" class="html-bibr">5</a>]), and (<b>d</b>) εNd(t) vs. age (Ma) diagram for the magmatic rocks from the Tuwu-Yandong belt (and adjacent areas in the middle section of the Dananhu island arc). The data from previous studies can be found in <a href="#app1-minerals-12-01573" class="html-app">Supplementary Tables S2 and S3</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>(<b>a</b>) Zircon age vs. Ce<sup>4+</sup>/Ce<sup>3+</sup> ratios; (<b>b</b>) zircon age vs. T; (<b>c</b>) Zircon δEu vs. Ce<sup>4+</sup>/Ce<sup>3+</sup> ratios and (<b>d</b>) T vs. logƒO<sub>2</sub> [<a href="#B58-minerals-12-01573" class="html-bibr">58</a>,<a href="#B74-minerals-12-01573" class="html-bibr">74</a>]. Data on the ore-related/barren intrusions in northern Chile are from [<a href="#B37-minerals-12-01573" class="html-bibr">37</a>]. Data on the medium-large and small porphyry deposits in the CAOB are from [<a href="#B3-minerals-12-01573" class="html-bibr">3</a>]. The data on the diorite, plagiogranite porphyry, quartz albite porphyry, and quartz porphyry of the Tuwu-Yandong deposits are from [<a href="#B10-minerals-12-01573" class="html-bibr">10</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>(<b>a</b>) Th/Yb vs. Nb/Yb diagram (after [<a href="#B90-minerals-12-01573" class="html-bibr">90</a>]), (<b>b</b>) Th/Yb vs. Ta/Yb diagram (after [<a href="#B91-minerals-12-01573" class="html-bibr">91</a>]), (<b>c</b>) Ba/Th vs. Th/Nb diagram, and (<b>d</b>) La/Sm vs. La diagram of the intrusive rocks in the Tuwu-Yandong belt. N-MORB and E-MORB, respectively, represent the normal and enriched mid-ocean ridge basalts, and OIB represents the ocean island basalts.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Discrimination diagrams for the genetic type of the granitoids in the Tuwu-Yandong belt. (<b>a</b>) Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O vs. 10,000 Ga/Al diagram [<a href="#B96-minerals-12-01573" class="html-bibr">96</a>]; (<b>b</b>) FeO<sup>T</sup>/MgO vs. Zr + Nb + Ce + Y diagram [<a href="#B96-minerals-12-01573" class="html-bibr">96</a>]; (<b>c</b>) P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> diagram; (<b>d</b>) Y vs. Rb diagram [<a href="#B99-minerals-12-01573" class="html-bibr">99</a>]. FG, fractionated felsic granites; OGT, unfractionated M-, I-, and S-type granites. The data from previous studies can be found in <a href="#app1-minerals-12-01573" class="html-app">Supplementary Table S1</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>(<b>a</b>) Rb vs. (Y+Nb) diagram [<a href="#B113-minerals-12-01573" class="html-bibr">113</a>], (<b>b</b>) Ta vs. Yb diagram [<a href="#B113-minerals-12-01573" class="html-bibr">113</a>], and (<b>c</b>) Rb/30-Hf-3×Ta diagram [<a href="#B114-minerals-12-01573" class="html-bibr">114</a>] for the granitic rocks. WPG, within-plate granites; VAG, volcanic arc granites; Syn-COLG, syn-collision granites; Post-COLG, post-collision granites; ORG, ocean ridge granites. (<b>d</b>) Hf/3-Th-Ta diagram [<a href="#B111-minerals-12-01573" class="html-bibr">111</a>] for the gabbro. IAB, island arc basalt; N-MORB, normal-type mid-ocean ridge basalt; E-MORB, enriched-type mid-ocean ridge basalt; WPA, within-plate alkalic; WPT, within-plate tholeiite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Schematic cartoons illustrating the Carboniferous tectono-magmatic-metallogenic evolution model of the Tuwu-Yandong porphyry Cu belt in eastern Tianshan. (<b>a</b>) The northward flat subduction of the Kangguer ocean slab induced the partial melting of the subducted slab, producing the adakitic rocks and associated porphyry Cu mineralization during ca. 335–315 Ma. (<b>b</b>) The ca. 314–310 Ma slab rollback induced the partial melting of the subduction-modified and depleted mantle and juvenile lower crust, producing high-Al gabbro and non-fractionated I-type granite porphyry, respectively.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 32295 KiB  
Article
The Mesozoic Tectonic Transition from Compression to Extension in the South China Block: Insight from Structural Deformation of the Lushan Massif, SE China
by Fan Yang, Chuanzhong Song, Shenglian Ren and Meihua Ji
Minerals 2022, 12(12), 1531; https://doi.org/10.3390/min12121531 - 29 Nov 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1995
Abstract
The Lushan Massif has been considered an extensional dome which represents a typical extensional structure in South China. However, the composition and structure of the Lushan Massif are still unclear. In this study, we identified the eastern detachment fault (EDF) for the first [...] Read more.
The Lushan Massif has been considered an extensional dome which represents a typical extensional structure in South China. However, the composition and structure of the Lushan Massif are still unclear. In this study, we identified the eastern detachment fault (EDF) for the first time. In addition, many sinistral strike-slip structures have also been recognized in the Lushan area, such as the Xingzi shear zone (XZSZ) and Lianhua shear zone (LHSZ). Detailed field observation and structural analysis revealed that the former sinistral faults are tectonic boundaries of the later Lushan extensional dome (LSED). The tectonic evolution sequence was established after the structural analysis combined with zircon U-Pb dating and mica 40Ar-39Ar dating of metamorphic rocks, veins, and intrusive rocks from the strike-slip fault and detachment fault. The Lushan Massif has undergone sinistral ductile shearing within 162–150 Ma. The LSED was then formed in an extensional tectonic setting from 140 to 114 Ma. Together with the regional geological setting, we believe that the sinistral strike-slip structures, represented by the XZSZ and LHSZ, are coeval with the Tanlu fault system and could be controlled by a transpressional stress field resulting from the subduction of the Pacific Plate. The LSED was formed in a back-arc extension setting resulting from the rollback of a subducted slab. The tectonic transition from compression to extension in the South China Block took place at 150–140 Ma. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geological map of the Lushan area (modified from 916 geological party of JiangXi bureau of geology and exploration, 2003).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Transverse section (“A-B”) and tectonic sections in the north (“C-D”) and south (“E-F”) of the Lushan Massif.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The planar and linear structural elements in (<b>A</b>) mylonites, measured within the XZSZ area; (<b>B</b>) mylonitic rocks, measured within the LHSZ area; and (<b>C</b>) ductile-deformed rocks, measured within the strike-slip ductile shear zones, north of the Lushan Massif. All the diagrams are equiareal, lower hemisphere Schmidt nets. Stereographic projections show a consistent trend of NE-NNE of ductile strike-slip structures in the Lushan Massif.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Field and microscopic photographs related to ductile strike-slip structures. “Ss” represents mylonitic foliation, and red arrows represent motion directions in the following figures. (<b>a</b>) Fold boudin that indicates the deformation direction in the XZSZ. (<b>b</b>) Sigma-shape feldspar porphyroblasts and oblique quartz grain shape fabrics indicating shear sense. (<b>c</b>) Asymmetric fold that shows the shear direction in the LHSZ. (<b>d</b>) S-C fabric indicating shear sense.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Plane (<b>a</b>) and stereoscopic (<b>b</b>) sketch of the Lushan area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The planar and linear structural elements of extensional structures in the Lushan Massif. (<b>A</b>) Projection of planar and linear elements in the WDF and other ductile extensional strata (including syntectonic thrust tectonics), measured in the northwestern Lushan Massif, showing a top-to-the-NW shear sense. (<b>B</b>) Projection of planar and linear elements in the WDF and other ductile extensional strata, measured in the southwestern Lushan Massif, showing a top-to-the-SWW shear sense. (<b>C</b>) Projection of planar and linear elements in the EDF and other ductile extensional strata, measured in the southeastern Lushan Massif, indicating a top-to-the-SE shear sense. (<b>D</b>) Projection of planar and linear elements in the EDF and other ductile extensional strata, measured in the northeastern Lushan Massif, indicating a top-to-the-east shear sense. All the diagrams are equiareal, lower hemisphere Schmidt nets.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Field and microscopic photographs related to extensional structures. “Ss” represents mylonitic foliation, and red arrows represent motion directions in the following figures. (<b>a</b>) Tectonic gneiss zone with abundant ductile shearing phenomena in the EDF. (<b>b</b>) Mica-fish indicating a top-to-the-SE sense of shear. (<b>c</b>) Recumbent fold indicating a top-to-SSE shear sense in the EDF. (<b>d</b>) Tectonic breccias zone indicating a top-to-NWW shear sense in the WDF.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Geological map of the Lushan area with the isotopic dating results and sample localities (the legend is the same as in <a href="#minerals-12-01531-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>). White circles indicate the local sampling positions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Representative cathodoluminescence (CL) images of zircon grains for the rocks from the Lushan area. Circles indicate analyzed spots of U-Pb dating and zircon U-Pb ages are also shown.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Zircon U-Pb concordia plots and recalculated weighted mean <sup>206</sup>Pb/<sup>238</sup>U ages for sample LS26-2 (<b>a</b>; newly crystallized rims to the left and inherited cores to the right), sample NS-7 (<b>b</b>; newly crystallized rims to the left and inherited cores to the right), sample NS-17 (<b>c</b>; newly crystallized rims to the left and inherited cores to the right), sample LS26-3 (<b>d</b>), sample NS-16 (<b>e</b>) and sample LS23-1 (<b>f</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Plateau and inverse isochron Ar–Ar age of muscovite samples (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) from the metamorphic rocks within the WDF and biotite samples (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) from the Haihui granite and the gneiss within the Tan–Lu fault, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Structural evolution diagram of extensional stage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Schematic diagram showing the formation and evolution of two-period structures for the Lushan area. (<b>a</b>) Oblique subduction of the Pacific plate resulted in compressional stress field with formation of sinistral shear structures; (<b>b</b>) the compressional stress transformed into extensional stress under lithospheric thinning with the formation of extensional structures; (<b>c</b>) extension detachment and magmation led to the formation and uplift of the LSED.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Late Mesozoic tectonic evolution sequence of the Lushan Massif.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop