[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (8,609)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = satellite observations

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
23 pages, 1251 KiB  
Article
A Comparison of Physical-Based and Statistical-Based Radiative Transfer Models in Retrieving Atmospheric Temperature Profiles from the Microwave Temperature Sounder-II Onboard the Feng-Yun-3 Satellite
by Qiurui He, Xiao Guo, Ruiling Zhang, Jiaoyang Li, Lanjie Zhang, Junqi Jia and Xuhui Zhou
Atmosphere 2025, 16(1), 44; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16010044 - 2 Jan 2025
Abstract
The statistical retrieval of atmospheric parameters will be greatly affected by the accuracy of the simulated brightness temperatures (BTs) derived from the radiative transfer model. However, it is challenging to further improve a physical-based radiative transfer model (RTM) developed based on the physical [...] Read more.
The statistical retrieval of atmospheric parameters will be greatly affected by the accuracy of the simulated brightness temperatures (BTs) derived from the radiative transfer model. However, it is challenging to further improve a physical-based radiative transfer model (RTM) developed based on the physical mechanisms of wave transmission through the atmosphere. We develop a deep neural network-based RTM (DNN-based RTM) to calculate the simulated BTs for the Microwave Temperature Sounder-II onboard the Fengyun-3D satellite under different weather conditions. The DNN-based RTM is compared in detail with the physical-based RTM in retrieving the atmospheric temperature profiles by the statistical retrieval scheme. Compared to the physical-based RTM, the DNN-based RTM can obtain higher accuracy for simulated BTs and enables the statistical retrieval scheme to achieve higher accuracy in temperature profile retrieval in clear, cloudy, and rainy sky conditions. Due to its ability to simulate microwave observations more accurately, the DNN-based RTM is valuable for the theoretical study of microwave remote sensing and the application of passive microwave observations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Atmospheric Techniques, Instruments, and Modeling)
19 pages, 3737 KiB  
Article
End-to-End Multi-Scale Adaptive Remote Sensing Image Dehazing Network
by Xinhua Wang, Botao Yuan, Haoran Dong, Qiankun Hao and Zhuang Li
Sensors 2025, 25(1), 218; https://doi.org/10.3390/s25010218 - 2 Jan 2025
Abstract
Satellites frequently encounter atmospheric haze during imaging, leading to the loss of detailed information in remote sensing images and significantly compromising image quality. This detailed information is crucial for applications such as Earth observation and environmental monitoring. In response to the above issues, [...] Read more.
Satellites frequently encounter atmospheric haze during imaging, leading to the loss of detailed information in remote sensing images and significantly compromising image quality. This detailed information is crucial for applications such as Earth observation and environmental monitoring. In response to the above issues, this paper proposes an end-to-end multi-scale adaptive feature extraction method for remote sensing image dehazing (MSD-Net). In our network model, we introduce a dilated convolution adaptive module to extract global and local detail features of remote sensing images. The design of this module can extract important image features at different scales. By expanding convolution, the receptive field is expanded to capture broader contextual information, thereby obtaining a more global feature representation. At the same time, a self-adaptive attention mechanism is also used, allowing the module to automatically adjust the size of its receptive field based on image content. In this way, important features suitable for different scales can be flexibly extracted to better adapt to the changes in details in remote sensing images. To fully utilize the features at different scales, we also adopted feature fusion technology. By fusing features from different scales and integrating information from different scales, more accurate and rich feature representations can be obtained. This process aids in retrieving lost detailed information from remote sensing images, thereby enhancing the overall image quality. A large number of experiments were conducted on the HRRSD and RICE datasets, and the results showed that our proposed method can better restore the original details and texture information of remote sensing images in the field of dehazing and is superior to current state-of-the-art methods. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Sensing and Imaging)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Diagram of the MSD-Net model architecture.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Diagram of the internal structure of the MSD-Net group module.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Visualization table of shallow concentration haze on HRRSD dataset.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Visualization table of equal concentration haze in HRRSD dataset.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>HRRSD dataset dense haze visualization table.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>RICE dataset visualization table.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>RICE Dataset Visualization Table.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Visualization of ablation experiments on the HRRSD dataset.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 2392 KiB  
Article
Single-Nucleus RNA Sequencing Reveals Cellular Transcriptome Features at Different Growth Stages in Porcine Skeletal Muscle
by Ziyu Chen, Xiaoqian Wu, Dongbin Zheng, Yuling Wang, Jie Chai, Tinghuan Zhang, Pingxian Wu, Minghong Wei, Ting Zhou, Keren Long, Mingzhou Li, Long Jin and Li Chen
Cells 2025, 14(1), 37; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14010037 - 2 Jan 2025
Abstract
Porcine latissimus dorsi muscle (LDM) is a crucial source of pork products. Meat quality indicators, such as the proportion of muscle fibers and intramuscular fat (IMF) deposition, vary during the growth and development of pigs. Numerous studies have highlighted the heterogeneous nature of [...] Read more.
Porcine latissimus dorsi muscle (LDM) is a crucial source of pork products. Meat quality indicators, such as the proportion of muscle fibers and intramuscular fat (IMF) deposition, vary during the growth and development of pigs. Numerous studies have highlighted the heterogeneous nature of skeletal muscle, with phenotypic differences reflecting variations in cellular composition and transcriptional profiles. This study investigates the cellular-level transcriptional characteristics of LDM in large white pigs at two growth stages (170 days vs. 245 days) using single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq). We identified 56,072 cells across 12 clusters, including myofibers, fibro/adipogenic progenitor (FAP) cells, muscle satellite cells (MUSCs), and other resident cell types. The same cell types were present in the LDM at both growth stages, but their proportions and states differed. A higher proportion of FAPs was observed in the skeletal muscle of 245-day-old pigs. Additionally, these cells exhibited more active communication with other cell types compared to 170-day-old pigs. For instance, more interactions were found between FAPs and pericytes or endothelial cells in 245-day-old pigs, including collagen and integrin family signaling. Three subclasses of FAPs was identified, comprising FAPs_COL3A1+, FAPs_PDE4D+, and FAPs_EBF1+, while adipocytes were categorized into Ad_PDE4D+ and Ad_DGAT2+ subclasses. The proportions of these subclasses differed between the two age groups. We also constructed differentiation trajectories for FAPs and adipocytes, revealing that FAPs in 245-day-old pigs differentiated more toward fibrosis, a characteristic reminiscent of the high prevalence of skeletal muscle fibrosis in aging humans. Furthermore, the Ad_PDE4D+ adipocyte subclass, predominant in 245-day-old pigs, originated from FAPs_PDE4D+ expressing the same gene, while the Ad_DGAT2+ subclass stemmed from FAPs_EBF1+. In conclusion, our study elucidates transcriptional differences in skeletal muscle between two growth stages of pigs and provides insights into mechanisms relevant to pork meat quality and skeletal muscle diseases. Full article
21 pages, 15639 KiB  
Article
First Retrieval of Sea Surface Currents Using L-Band SAR in Satellite Formation
by Bo Pan, Xinzhe Yuan, Tao Li, Tao Lai, Xiaoqing Wang, Chengji Xu and Haifeng Huang
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(1), 131; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17010131 - 2 Jan 2025
Abstract
The inversion of ocean currents is a significant challenge and area of interest in ocean remote sensing. Spaceborne along-track interferometric synthetic aperture radar (ATI-SAR) has several advantages and benefits, including precise observations, extensive swath coverage, and high resolution. However, a limited number of [...] Read more.
The inversion of ocean currents is a significant challenge and area of interest in ocean remote sensing. Spaceborne along-track interferometric synthetic aperture radar (ATI-SAR) has several advantages and benefits, including precise observations, extensive swath coverage, and high resolution. However, a limited number of spaceborne interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) systems are operating in orbit. Among these, the along-track baseline length is generally suboptimal, resulting in low inversion accuracy and difficulty in achieving operational stability. One of the approaches involves employing lower-frequency bands such as the L band to increase the baseline length to achieve the optimal baseline for a satellite formation. The LuTan-1 mission, the world’s first L-band distributed spaceborne InSAR system, was successfully launched on 27 February 2022. L-band distributed formation operation provides insight into the development of future spaceborne ATI systems with application to new exploration regimes and under optimal baseline conditions. There are two novel aspects of this investigation: (1) We described the ocean current inversion process and results based on LuTan-1 SAR data for the first time. (2) A cross-track baseline component phase removal method based on parameterized modeling was proposed for distributed InSAR systems. Both qualitative and quantitative comparisons validated the effectiveness and accuracy of the inversion results. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic of along-track interferometry geometry.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic of across-track interferometry geometry.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Geographical location of study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Intensity of primary image. (<b>b</b>) Intensity of secondary image.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Reference data. (<b>a</b>) ECMWF wind field at 10 m height above sea surface. (<b>b</b>) CMEMS sea surface velocity. (<b>c</b>) CMEMS sea surface height.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Flowchart of surface current extraction processor for distributed SAR interferometry.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) Correlation coefficient between primary and secondary images. (<b>b</b>) Interferometric phase diagram. The red box in the left column indicates the area corresponding to the interference fringes on the right.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Acquisition geometry of hybrid interferometric SAR.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a</b>) The residual fringe after the orbit-based method. (<b>b</b>) The fitted flat Earth phase. (<b>c</b>) The re-flattened interferograms. The color map represents the interferometric phase.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>M4S model ATI-SAR ocean surface retrieval process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>(<b>a</b>) Variation in RMSE with number of iterations. (<b>b</b>) Percentage of points that meet convergence conditions with increasing number of iterations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>(<b>a</b>) Sea surface velocity from LuTan-1. (<b>b</b>) Sea surface velocity reference data from CMEMS. Color map represents radial current velocity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>A scatter diagram of the LuTan-1 ATI currents versus the CMEMS reference data. The color map shows the point density per pixel. The red line represents the reference line where <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>y</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mi>x</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>The sea surface velocity retrieved by ATI. The color map represents the radial current velocity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Enlarged views of selected subregions from <a href="#remotesensing-17-00131-f014" class="html-fig">Figure 14</a>: (<b>a</b>) Region 1, (<b>b</b>) Region 2. The color map represents the radial current velocity.</p>
Full article ">
30 pages, 6197 KiB  
Article
Shoreline Change of Western Long Island, New York, from Satellite-Derived Shorelines
by Catherine N. Janda, Jonathan A. Warrick, Daniel Buscombe and Sharon Batiste
Coasts 2025, 5(1), 2; https://doi.org/10.3390/coasts5010002 - 2 Jan 2025
Abstract
Shoreline measurement techniques using satellite-derived imagery can provide decades of observations of shoreline change. Here we apply these techniques to the western south shore of Long Island, New York, which has three distinct beaches, Rockaway Peninsula, Long Beach, and Jones Beach Island, which [...] Read more.
Shoreline measurement techniques using satellite-derived imagery can provide decades of observations of shoreline change. Here we apply these techniques to the western south shore of Long Island, New York, which has three distinct beaches, Rockaway Peninsula, Long Beach, and Jones Beach Island, which are 18, 15, and 24 km in length, respectively. These beaches are recreation areas for millions of regional residents and include several groin fields, sediment dredging and nourishment operations, and a coastal wave climate that includes winter northeasterly storms and summer hurricanes. The shorelines along the western ends of these three beaches have been accreting at ~4 m/yr during the observation record (1984–2022) resulting from net westward longshore drift. The central 10–12 km of the beaches have lower shoreline change rates, and these rates are generally lowest within the groin fields (0.5–1.5 m/yr). Shoreline change observations also provide evidence for westward propagating accretion and erosion sediment waves that have durations of several years. Beach nourishment projects are shown to significantly influence rates of shoreline accretion, and this is commonly followed by significant shoreline retreat during the subsequent years. Full article
27 pages, 12707 KiB  
Review
Review of Assimilating Spaceborne Global Navigation Satellite System Remote Sensing Data for Tropical Cyclone Forecasting
by Weihua Bai, Guanyi Wang, Feixiong Huang, Yueqiang Sun, Qifei Du, Junming Xia, Xianyi Wang, Xiangguang Meng, Peng Hu, Cong Yin, Guangyuan Tan and Ruhan Wu
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(1), 118; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17010118 - 1 Jan 2025
Viewed by 349
Abstract
Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Radio Occultation (RO) and GNSS Reflectometry (GNSS-R) are the two major spaceborne GNSS remote sensing (GNSS-RS) techniques, providing observations of atmospheric profiles and the Earth’s surface. With the rapid development of GNSS-RS techniques and spaceborne missions, many experiments [...] Read more.
Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Radio Occultation (RO) and GNSS Reflectometry (GNSS-R) are the two major spaceborne GNSS remote sensing (GNSS-RS) techniques, providing observations of atmospheric profiles and the Earth’s surface. With the rapid development of GNSS-RS techniques and spaceborne missions, many experiments and studies were conducted to assimilate those observational data into numerical weather-prediction models for tropical cyclone (TC) forecasts. GNSS RO data, known for its high precision and all-weather observation capability, is particularly effective in forecasting mid-to-upper atmospheric levels. GNSS-R, on the other hand, plays a significant role in improving TC track and intensity predictions by observing ocean surface winds under high precipitation in the inner core of TCs. Different methods were developed to assimilate these remote sensing data. This review summarizes the results of assimilation studies using GNSS-RS data for TC forecasting. It concludes that assimilating GNSS RO data mainly enhances the prediction of precipitation and humidity, while assimilating GNSS-R data improves forecasts of the TC track and intensity. In the future, it is promising to combine GNSS RO and GNSS-R data for joint retrieval and assimilation, exploring better effects for TC forecasting. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Latest Advances and Application in the GNSS-R Field)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Mean forecast performance for each model over the North Atlantic (circle) and eastern North Pacific (triangle) basins [<a href="#B5-remotesensing-17-00118" class="html-bibr">5</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The geometric relations of RO and GNSS-R.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Typhoon Hondo in 2008 best-track and co-located ROs (<b>a</b>). TD (tropical depression), TS (tropical storm), and Cat. 1–4 means 1 min maximum sustained wind speed (m/s) ≤ 17, 18–32, 33–42, 43–49, 50–58, and 58–70 respectively. From the surface to 25 km altitude temperature (<b>b</b>) and specific humidity (<b>c</b>) profiles in the storm [<a href="#B17-remotesensing-17-00118" class="html-bibr">17</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Is DDM power, and (<b>b</b>) is DDM BRCS. In (<b>b</b>), the white rectangle highlights the region of the <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>σ</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> BRCS that can be used for estimating the wind speed. The white X marks the estimated location of the specular bin in the DDM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>GNSS-R ocean surface wind observations of FY-3E GNOS-II for Typhoon Mawaron 25 May in 2023 [<a href="#B25-remotesensing-17-00118" class="html-bibr">25</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The structure of the spaceborne integrated GNSS remote sensors (SIGRS) for FY-3E/GNOS- II [<a href="#B50-remotesensing-17-00118" class="html-bibr">50</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Difference distribution between the cloud top heights and the tropopause altitudes in GPS RO profiles with TC best tracks [<a href="#B58-remotesensing-17-00118" class="html-bibr">58</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) The Control Hurricane Zeta forecasts initialized at 1200 UTC 26 Oct, respectively, at 12, 24, and 30 h. (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) The C2 (Control with RO bending angle) Hurricane Zeta 12, 24, and 30 h forecasts initialized at 1200 UTC 26 Oct, respectively. (<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>) figures have horizontal wind vectors on the forecasts. (<b>g</b>–<b>i</b>) SSMIS 91-GHz color composite imagery, at 2225 UTC 26 Oct, 1058 UTC 27 Oct, and 0030 UTC 28 Oct, respectively. In (<b>h</b>), the NHC best track center is marked by a white triangle at 1200 UTC 27 Oct (21.38N, 89.08W) [<a href="#B76-remotesensing-17-00118" class="html-bibr">76</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a</b>) The HWRF Control Hurricane Zeta horizontal wind vectors (m/s) at 750 mbar with layer-averaged RH (shade, %) at 700–800 mbar from the cycled analysis initialized at 1200 UTC 26 Oct. (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>) As in (<b>a</b>), but for the 12 and 18 h verification times, respectively. (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) As in (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>), but for the HWRF C2 forecast. The dry tongue is highlighted by the black rectangular boxes [<a href="#B76-remotesensing-17-00118" class="html-bibr">76</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) is for GA (the JMA global analysis), MA (analysis by the Meso 4D-Var system), and MA_RO (the same as MA but RO data were assimilated additionally), the distributions of sea-level pressure (hPa), surface wind vectors (m/s), and accumulated precipitation (shade, mm) in a 3 h period at 0000 UTC 31 July 2007 from NHM forecasts using different background fields [<a href="#B78-remotesensing-17-00118" class="html-bibr">78</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Time series of the central pressure predicted by NHM of typhoon Usagi, for GA, MA, MA_RO, and Besttrack data [<a href="#B78-remotesensing-17-00118" class="html-bibr">78</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>(<b>a</b>) The black dot is the best track from observations, and others are the simulated tracks for NODA (the initial condition from NCEP), GTS (assimilating conventional and satellite radiance data), REF (GTS along with RO refractivity), and BND (GTS along with RO bending angle), respectively. The area in the dashed square is zoomed as shown at the upper-right corner with the details of the tracks. (<b>b</b>) As in (<b>a</b>), but the tracks during 5–7 Jul [<a href="#B79-remotesensing-17-00118" class="html-bibr">79</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>(<b>a</b>) Observation, (<b>b</b>) NODA, (<b>c</b>) GTS, (<b>d</b>) REF, and (<b>e</b>) BND, the accumulated rainfall (mm) during 0000 UTC 7–8 Jul 2016. Text at the bottom right is the location and amount of the maximum rainfall (mm) [<a href="#B79-remotesensing-17-00118" class="html-bibr">79</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>(<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) are time series of MSLP and MSW, respectively, during the cycled DA period, 1200 UTC 1 to 0600 UTC 4 Aug 2005. Red for CTRL (assimilating simulated conventional observations), pink and blue for GYGNSS SUPO (CTRL plus CYGNSS speeds and thinning data to one per grid box, closest point kept) and THIN (SUPO but speeds averages kept), respectively, and black for NR. (<b>c</b>–<b>f</b>) As in (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>), but for track, track errors, MSLP, and MSW, respectively, between 0600 UTC 4 and 0000 UTC 6 Aug 2005. Different colored numbers mean the absolute error average of track and intensity in the whole analysis or simulation [<a href="#B88-remotesensing-17-00118" class="html-bibr">88</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>(<b>a</b>,<b>d</b>,<b>g</b>) 6 h; (<b>b</b>,<b>e</b>,<b>h</b>) 3 h; and (<b>c</b>,<b>f</b>,<b>i</b>) 1 h DA cycling experiments for average storm forecast error. Averaged errors/deviations are colored by OSSE experiment: CNTL (conventional observation assimilated) is black/gray, CYG (CNTL plus CYGNSS speeds) is red/light red, and VAM (CNTL plus CYGNSS VAM vectors) is blue/light blue [<a href="#B87-remotesensing-17-00118" class="html-bibr">87</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>TC intensity in time series for (<b>a</b>) MSLP and (<b>b</b>) MSW from JTWC best track data, CTRL (a WRF regional simulation), DA_cyg_fd (assimilating CYGNSS fully developed seas wind speed), DA_cyg_lf (assimilating CYGNSS young seas/limited fetch wind speed), and DA_com (assimilating combined IMERGE rainfall, ASCT vector wind, and CYGNSS wind speed) at 0000 UTC on 6–9 January 2018 [<a href="#B90-remotesensing-17-00118" class="html-bibr">90</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>(<b>a</b>) IMERG (Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM data), (<b>b</b>) CTRL, and (<b>c</b>) DA_com precipitation around the TC center at 1500 UTC on 7 January 2018; (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) as in (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>), but at 2100 UTC on 8 January 2018 [<a href="#B90-remotesensing-17-00118" class="html-bibr">90</a>].</p>
Full article ">
30 pages, 60239 KiB  
Article
Retrieval and Evaluation of Global Surface Albedo Based on AVHRR GAC Data of the Last 40 Years
by Shaopeng Li, Xiongxin Xiao, Christoph Neuhaus and Stefan Wunderle
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(1), 117; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17010117 - 1 Jan 2025
Viewed by 308
Abstract
In this study, the global land surface albedo namely GAC43 was retrieved for the years 1979 to 2020 using Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) global area coverage (GAC) data onboard National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and Meteorological Operational (MetOp) satellites. We [...] Read more.
In this study, the global land surface albedo namely GAC43 was retrieved for the years 1979 to 2020 using Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) global area coverage (GAC) data onboard National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and Meteorological Operational (MetOp) satellites. We provide a comprehensive retrieval process of the GAC43 albedo, followed by a comprehensive assessment against in situ measurements and three widely used satellite-based albedo products, the third edition of the CM SAF cLoud, Albedo and surface RAdiation (CLARA-A3), the Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) albedo product, and MODIS BRDF/albedo product (MCD43). Our quantitative evaluations indicate that GAC43 demonstrates the best stability, with a linear trend of ±0.002 per decade at nearly all pseudo invariant calibration sites (PICS) from 1982 to 2020. In contrast, CLARA-A3 exhibits significant noise before the 2000s due to the limited availability of observations, while C3S shows substantial biases during the same period due to imperfect sensors intercalibrations. Extensive validation at globally distributed homogeneous sites shows that GAC43 has comparable accuracy to C3S, with an overall RMSE of approximately 0.03, but a smaller positive bias of 0.012. Comparatively, MCD43C3 shows the lowest RMSE (~0.023) and minimal bias, while CLARA-A3 displays the highest RMSE (~0.042) and bias (0.02). Furthermore, GAC43, CLARA-A3, and C3S exhibit overestimation in forests, with positive biases exceeding 0.023 and RMSEs of at least 0.028. In contrast, MCD43C3 shows negligible bias and a smaller RMSE of 0.015. For grasslands and shrublands, GAC43 and MCD43C3 demonstrate comparable estimation uncertainties of approximately 0.023, with close positive biases near 0.09, whereas C3S and CLARA-A3 exhibit higher RMSEs and biases exceeding 0.032 and 0.022, respectively. All four albedo products show significant RMSEs around 0.035 over croplands but achieve the highest estimation accuracy better than 0.020 over deserts. It is worth noting that significant biases are typically attributed to insufficient spatial representativeness of the measurement sites. Globally, GAC43 and C3S exhibit similar spatial distribution patterns across most land surface conditions, including an overestimation compared to MCD43C3 and an underestimation compared to CLARA-A3 in forested areas. In addition, GAC43, C3S, and CLARA-A3 estimate higher albedo values than MCD43C3 in low-vegetation regions, such as croplands, grasslands, savannas, and woody savannas. Besides the fact that the new GAC43 product shows the best stability covering the last 40 years, one has to consider the higher proportion of backup inversions before 2000. Overall, GAC43 offers a promising long-term and consistent albedo with good accuracy for future studies such as global climate change, energy balance, and land management policy. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Local solar times and solar zenith angles of equator observations for all AVHRR-carrying NOAA and MetOp satellites used to generate GAC43 albedo products as shown in (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>), respectively. SZA &gt; 90° indicates night conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Globally distributed sites with homogeneous characteristics and corresponding land cover types defined by the IGBP from the MCD12C1 product. Purple squares located in the desert are used to evaluate temporal stability, while other sites are utilized for direct validations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Flowchart for this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The performance of full inversion and full and backup inversion at various IGBP land cover types.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The performance of the GAC43 albedo with full inversions at various land cover types, where panels (<b>a</b>–<b>h</b>) represent the land cover types of BSV, CRO, DBF, EBF, ENF, GRA, OSH and WSA, respectively. In the plots, the red solid line represents the 1:1 line, and the green dotted line and purple solid lines represent the limits of deviation ±0.02 and ±0.04, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Google Earth <sup>TM</sup> images were used to visually illustrate the heterogeneity surrounding selected homogeneous sites representing various land cover types: (<b>a</b>) EBF, (<b>b</b>) BSV, (<b>c</b>) CRO and (<b>d</b>) GRA, as defined by the MCD12C1 IGBP classification. The red circle in each image denotes a radius of 2.5 km.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Inter-comparison performance among four satellite-based albedo products. The top four subfigures (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) show the accuracy of all available matching samples between in situ measurements and estimated albedo values derived from satellite products, while the bottom four subfigures (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>) give the performance of that using same samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The performance of four satellite-based albedo products using same samples across various land surface types, evaluated in terms of (<b>a</b>) RMSE and (<b>b</b>) bias, respectively. The <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis represents the land cover type classified as forest, grassland or shrublands, cropland, and desert, and corresponding available samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The temporal performance of four satellite-based albedo products related to in situ measurements, and each subplot represents one case of different land cover surface, including (<b>a</b>) EBF, (<b>b</b>) ENF, (<b>c</b>) DBF, (<b>d</b>) GRA, and (<b>e</b>) CRO, respectively. The grey shaded areas depict situations with snow cover.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Spatial distributions of GAC43 BSA in July 2013 are shown in subgraph (<b>a</b>), with corresponding differences from (<b>b</b>) CLARA-A3, (<b>c</b>) C3S, and (<b>d</b>) MCD43C3 in the same month, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Percentage difference in BSA values between (<b>a</b>) GAC43 and CLARA-A3, (<b>b</b>) GAC43 and C3S, and (<b>c</b>) GAC43 and MCD43C3 in July 2013.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The scattering plots between GAC43 BSA and (<b>a</b>) CLARA-A3 BSA, (<b>b</b>) C3S BSA, and (<b>c</b>) MCD43C3 BSA using all snow-free monthly pixels in July 2013, where the red lines indicate 1:1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>The monthly BSA for the four satellite-based products across various land cover types in July 2013, where panels (<b>a</b>–<b>i</b>) represent the land cover types of CRO, DBF, DNF, EBF, ENF, GRA, MF, SAV and WSA, respectively. In the plots, the bottom values of each albedo product are the median of all corresponding land cover estimates. The top values match available samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Monthly BSA from GAC43, MCD43C3, C3S, and CALRA-A3 at three randomly selected PICS sites: (<b>a</b>) Arabia 2, 20.19°N, 51.63°E; (<b>b</b>) Libya 3, 23.22°N, 23.23°E; and (<b>c</b>) Sudan 1, 22.11°N, 28.11°E, all characterized by BSV land surfaces as defined by IGBP.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Box plots of the slope per decade for GAC43, CLARA-A3, C3S, and MCD43C3 at all PICS sites, where (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) represent the corresponding statistics during 1982–1990, 1991–2000, 2001–2010 and 2011–2020, respectively, and three dashed grey lines represent the 75%, 50%, and 25% quantiles. Red dotted lines indicate the horizontal line where slope is 0.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Percentage of full inversions for the years 2004, 2008, 2012, and 2016 based on GAC43 (<b>top</b>) and MCD43A3 (<b>bottom</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Percentage of full inversions of GAC43 at various continents from 1979 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Spatial distributions of GAC43 BSA in July 2004 are shown in subgraph (<b>a</b>), with corresponding differences from (<b>b</b>) CLARA-A3, (<b>c</b>) C3S, and (<b>d</b>) MCD43C3 in the same month, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure A2
<p>Spatial distributions of GAC43 BSA in July 2008 are shown in subgraph (<b>a</b>), with corresponding differences from (<b>b</b>) CLARA-A3, (<b>c</b>) C3S, and (<b>d</b>) MCD43C3 in the same month, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure A3
<p>Spatial distributions of GAC43 BSA in July 2012 are shown in subgraph (<b>a</b>), with corresponding differences from (<b>b</b>) CLARA-A3, (<b>c</b>) C3S, and (<b>d</b>) MCD43C3 in the same month, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure A4
<p>Spatial distributions of GAC43 BSA in July 2016 are shown in subgraph (<b>a</b>), with corresponding differences from (<b>b</b>) CLARA-A3, (<b>c</b>) C3S, and (<b>d</b>) MCD43C3 in the same month, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure A5
<p>Percentages of full inversions for the years between 1979 and 2020 based on GAC43 data record.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 2960 KiB  
Article
Comparison of Precipitation Rates from Global Datasets for the Five-Year Period from 2019 to 2023
by Heike Hartmann
Hydrology 2025, 12(1), 4; https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology12010004 - 1 Jan 2025
Viewed by 295
Abstract
Precipitation is a fundamental component of the hydrologic cycle and is an extremely important variable in meteorological, climatological, and hydrological studies. Reliable climate information including accurate precipitation data is essential for identifying precipitation trends and variability as well as applying hydrologic models for [...] Read more.
Precipitation is a fundamental component of the hydrologic cycle and is an extremely important variable in meteorological, climatological, and hydrological studies. Reliable climate information including accurate precipitation data is essential for identifying precipitation trends and variability as well as applying hydrologic models for purposes such as estimating (surface) water availability and predicting flooding. In this study, I compared precipitation rates from five reanalysis datasets and one analysis dataset—the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Reanalysis Version 5 (ERA-5), the Japanese 55-Year Reanalysis (JRA-55), the Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications Version 2 (MERRA-2), the National Center for Environmental Prediction/National Center for Atmospheric Research Reanalysis 1 (NCEP/NCAR R1), the NCEP/Department of Energy Reanalysis 2 (NCEP/DOE R2), and the NCEP/Climate Forecast System Version 2 (NCEP/CFSv2)—with the merged satellite and rain gauge dataset from the Global Precipitation Climatology Project in Version 2.3 (GPCPv2.3). The latter was taken as a reference due to its global availability including the oceans. Monthly mean precipitation rates of the most recent five-year period from 2019 to 2023 were chosen for this comparison, which included calculating differences, percentage errors, Spearman correlation coefficients, and root mean square errors (RMSEs). ERA-5 showed the highest agreement with the reference dataset with the lowest mean and maximum percentage errors, the highest mean correlation, and the smallest mean RMSE. The highest mean and maximum percentage errors as well as the lowest correlations were observed between NCEP/NCAR R1 and GPCPv2.3. NCEP/DOE R2 showed significantly higher precipitation rates than the reference dataset (only JRA-55 precipitation rates were higher), the second lowest correlations, and the highest mean RMSE. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Mean precipitation rates for the period from 2019 to 2023 for the different datasets. Data are presented in a spatial resolution of 2.5 °. The maps show mean precipitation rates from (<b>a</b>) ERA-5, (<b>b</b>) JRA-55, (<b>c</b>) MERRA-2, (<b>d</b>) NCEP/NCAR R1, (<b>e</b>) NCEP/DOE R2, (<b>f</b>) NCEP/CFSv2, and (<b>g</b>) GPCPv2.3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Differences between all datasets and the reference dataset for the period from 2019 to 2023. The maps show differences between precipitation rates from (<b>a</b>) ERA-5 and GPCPv2.3, (<b>b</b>) JRA-55 and GPCPv2.3, (<b>c</b>) MERRA-2 and GPCPv2.3, (<b>d</b>) NCEP/NCAR R1 and GPCPv2.3, (<b>e</b>) NCEP/DOE R2 and GPCPv2.3, and (<b>f</b>) NCEP/CFSv2 and GPCPv2.3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Percentage errors between all datasets and the reference dataset for the period from 2019 to 2023. The maps show percentage errors between precipitation rates from (<b>a</b>) ERA-5 and GPCPv2.3, (<b>b</b>) JRA-55 and GPCPv2.3, (<b>c</b>) MERRA-2 and GPCPv2.3, (<b>d</b>) NCEP/NCAR R1 and GPCPv2.3, (<b>e</b>) NCEP/DOE R2 and GPCPv2.3, and (<b>f</b>) NCEP/CFSv2 and GPCPv2.3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Spearman rank correlation coefficients between all datasets and the reference dataset in monthly resolution for the period from 2019 to 2023. The maps show Spearman rank correlation coefficients between (<b>a</b>) ERA-5 and GPCPv2.3, (<b>b</b>) JRA-55 and GPCPv2.3, (<b>c</b>) MERRA-2 and GPCPv2.3, (<b>d</b>) NCEP/NCAR R1 and GPCPv2.3, (<b>e</b>) NCEP/DOE R2 and GPCPv2.3, and (<b>f</b>) NCEP/CFSv2 and GPCPv2.3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>RMSEs between all datasets and the reference dataset in monthly resolution for the period from 2019 to 2023. The maps show RMSEs between (<b>a</b>) ERA-5 and GPCPv2.3, (<b>b</b>) JRA-55 and GPCPv2.3, (<b>c</b>) MERRA-2 and GPCPv2.3, (<b>d</b>) NCEP/NCAR R1 and GPCPv2.3, (<b>e</b>) NCEP/DOE R2 and GPCPv2.3, and (<b>f</b>) NCEP/CFSv2 and GPCPv2.3.</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 19809 KiB  
Article
Remote Monitoring of the Impact of Oil Spills on Vegetation in the Niger Delta, Nigeria
by Abdullahi A. Kuta, Stephen Grebby and Doreen S. Boyd
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(1), 338; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15010338 - 1 Jan 2025
Viewed by 323
Abstract
The widespread oil extraction in the Niger Delta and the impacts on different types of vegetation are poorly understood due to lack of ground access. This study aims to determine the impact of oil spills on vegetation in the Niger Delta using a [...] Read more.
The widespread oil extraction in the Niger Delta and the impacts on different types of vegetation are poorly understood due to lack of ground access. This study aims to determine the impact of oil spills on vegetation in the Niger Delta using a Landsat satellite-derived normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI). The impact of oil spill volume and time after an oil spill on the health of different types of vegetation were evaluated, and the time series of the changes in NDVI were analysed to determine the medium- and long-term responses of vegetation to oil spill exposure, using a combination of linear regression and paired t-tests. With regards to the relationship between spill volume and NDVI, a moderate correlation (R2 = 0.5018) was observed for spill volumes in the range of 401–1000 barrels for sparse vegetation, for volumes greater than 1000 barrels for dense vegetation (R2 = 0.4356), whilst no correlation was found for mangrove vegetation at any range of spill volume. Similarly, the results of the paired t-test confirmed a significant difference (p-value < 0.05) between the change in NDVI values for spill sites and non-spill sites for all vegetation types, with the sparse vegetation being the most affected of the three types. However, the impact of the oil spill on vegetation over a period is not statistically significant. The outcomes of this study provide insights into how different types of vegetation in the Niger Delta respond to oil spills, which could ultimately help in designing an oil spill clean-up program to reduce the impact on the environment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Earth Sciences)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Map of the study area (<b>b</b>) in relation to Nigeria and (<b>c</b>) in relation to West Africa, and field picture of dense vegetation (<b>d</b>), sparse vegetation (<b>e</b>), and mangrove vegetation (<b>f</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Spatial distribution of oil spill sample points for determining the effect of oil spills on the different vegetation types and (<b>b</b>) locations of spills and no-spills sites for temporal monitoring of oil spill impacts on vegetation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Vegetation sample points in red at the spill site, (<b>a</b>) before the spill, (<b>b</b>) after the spill, and control site, (<b>c</b>) before the spill, and (<b>d</b>) after the spill for dense vegetation (<b>Top left</b>), sparse vegetation (<b>Top right</b>), and the mangrove vegetation (<b>bottom</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Box plot statistical summary of post-spill NDVI values for each vegetation type. Min and Max are the lowest and highest values of NDVI, respectively, excluding the outliers (diamond symbols). Q1 is the first quartile (25 percentile), and Q3 is the third quartile (75th percentile).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The relationship between post-spill NDVI and oil spill volume for (<b>a</b>) dense vegetation, (<b>b</b>) sparse vegetation, and (<b>c</b>) mangrove vegetation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The relationship between post-spill NDVI and oil spill volumes greater than 225 bbl for (<b>a</b>) dense vegetation, (<b>b</b>) sparse vegetation, and (<b>c</b>) mangrove vegetation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The relationship between post-spill NDVI and oil spill volumes of 225–400 bbl for (<b>a</b>) dense vegetation, (<b>b</b>) sparse vegetation, and (<b>c</b>) mangrove vegetation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The relationship between post-spill NDVI and oil spill volumes of 401–1000 bbl for (<b>a</b>) dense vegetation, (<b>b</b>) sparse vegetation, and (<b>c</b>) mangrove vegetation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Relationship between post-spill NDVI and oil spill volumes greater than 1000 bbl for (<b>a</b>) dense vegetation, (<b>b</b>) sparse vegetation, and (<b>c</b>) mangrove vegetation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Relationship between post-spill NDVI and time after the spill for (<b>a</b>) dense vegetation, (<b>b</b>) sparse vegetation, and (<b>c</b>) mangrove vegetation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Relationship between ∆NDVI and number of days after a spill for volumes above 225 bbl and control sites for (<b>a</b>) dense vegetation, (<b>b</b>) sparse vegetation, and (<b>c</b>) Mangrove vegetation and (<b>d</b>) boxplot summary of ∆NDVI for spill sites (SSs) and control sites (CSs) for dense, sparse, and mangrove vegetation with the <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values from paired <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test analysis to determine the statistical differences in post-spill ∆NDVI for corresponding pairs of SSs and CSs located within dense (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 8), sparse (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 8) and mangrove vegetation (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 6). Levels of significance: <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value &lt; 0.0010 (highly significant); <span class="html-italic">p</span> value &lt; 0.0100 (very significant); <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value &lt; 0.0500 (significant); <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value ≥ 0.0500 (not significant) <a href="#applsci-15-00338-f011" class="html-fig">Figure 11</a>d.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>h</b>) Temporal changes in NDVI (ΔNDVI) for SS and CS pairs in dense vegetation for different oil spill volumes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>h</b>) Temporal changes in NDVI (ΔNDVI) for SS and CS pairs in sparse vegetation for different oil spill volumes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>) Temporal changes in NDVI (ΔNDVI) for SS and CS pairs in mangrove vegetation for different oil spill volumes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Temporal changes in NDVI (ΔNDVI) at spill sites (SSs) for different oil spill volumes in (<b>a</b>) dense vegetation, (<b>b</b>) sparse vegetation, and (<b>c</b>) mangroves.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 2632 KiB  
Article
Assessment of Beach Slope and Sediment Grain Size Anywhere in the World: Review of Existing Formulae, Integration of Tidal Influence, and Perspectives from Satellite Observations
by Amélie Arias, Rafael Almar, Vincent Regard, Erwin W. J. Bergsma, Bruno Castelle and Thierry Garlan
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2025, 13(1), 58; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13010058 - 31 Dec 2024
Viewed by 268
Abstract
Grain size and beach slope are critical factors in coastal science and management. However, it is difficult to have information on their distribution everywhere in the world, as most of the coast has never been documented. For many applications, it is essential to [...] Read more.
Grain size and beach slope are critical factors in coastal science and management. However, it is difficult to have information on their distribution everywhere in the world, as most of the coast has never been documented. For many applications, it is essential to have at least a rough estimate when local field measurements are not available. Here, we review the existing prediction formulas relating beach slope to grain size and wave conditions, using publicly available global datasets and comparing them with a benchmark dataset of ground measurements from different authors worldwide. Uncertainties arise from the input parameters, in particular coastal waves, a key parameter of all formulae, but also from empirical coefficients that are undocumented or inaccessible with the global dataset. Despite the recognized importance of tides, they are often overlooked in formulae relating beach slope to sediment grain size. We therefore present an improved formulation that incorporates tidal effects. Although satellites offer a promising alternative to predictive formulae for direct estimation of beach slope and grain size, the current accuracy and methodologies of satellite data are insufficient for global applications. Continued advances in satellite missions, including higher resolution and revisit frequency, as well as new sensors, are essential to improve predictive capabilities and facilitate wider implementation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Coastal Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Illustration of the wide variety of sediment grain size along world beaches (Photos from E. Anthony at Grand Popo, Benin, left, and A. Arias at Oleron island, France, right).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Location of the studied field sites (black circles) in (<b>a</b>), with the distribution of formula parameters, hydrodynamic forcing from global numerical models, wave (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">Hs</span> and (<b>c</b>) <span class="html-italic">Tp</span>, (<b>d</b>) tidal range (<span class="html-italic">M</span>), and locally measured (<b>e</b>) grain size and (<b>f</b>) beach slope.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Relationship between in situ and derivated beach face slope for the validation sites, using various formulas.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Explained fraction of the total reconstructed signal (52%) of the grain size variability, considering a multilinear model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Observed versus predicted beach slopes considering the Sunnamura84 formula and the tidally modified expression of <span class="html-italic">Hs</span> and (<b>b</b>) the departure of the hydrodynamic parameter <span class="html-italic">Hs</span><sub>_tide</sub> influenced by tidal range from original Hs (i.e., no tidal range gives <span class="html-italic">Hs</span><sub>_tide</sub> = <span class="html-italic">Hs</span> over the 1:1 line).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Satellite-derived beach slope versus in situ beach slope, and (<b>b</b>) relationship between in situ sediment grain size (mm) and derivated beach face slope for the validation sites. The x-axis represents the in situ grain size, and the y-axis represents the calculated beachfront slope using various formulas.</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 8167 KiB  
Article
Utilizing Machine Learning and Geospatial Techniques to Evaluate Post-Fire Vegetation Recovery in Mediterranean Forest Ecosystem: Tenira, Algeria
by Ali Ahmed Souane, Abbas Khurram, Hui Huang, Zhan Shu, Shujie Feng, Benamar Belgherbi and Zhiyuan Wu
Forests 2025, 16(1), 53; https://doi.org/10.3390/f16010053 - 31 Dec 2024
Viewed by 324
Abstract
This study investigated post-fire vegetation recovery in Algeria’s Tenira forest using statistical traits (PCA), RFM, and LANDIS-II spatial analysis. The dataset included satellite imagery and environmental variables such as precipitation, temperature, slope, and elevation, spanning over a decade (2010–2020). Tenira forest is composed [...] Read more.
This study investigated post-fire vegetation recovery in Algeria’s Tenira forest using statistical traits (PCA), RFM, and LANDIS-II spatial analysis. The dataset included satellite imagery and environmental variables such as precipitation, temperature, slope, and elevation, spanning over a decade (2010–2020). Tenira forest is composed of Mediterranean species (36.5%); the biological types encountered are dominated by therophytes (39.19%). Ninety fire outbreaks were recorded, resulting in a loss of 1400.56 ha of surface area. Following the PCA results, precipitation, temperature, slope, and elevation were the main drivers of recovery (PC1 explained 43% alone, with the first five principal components accounting for 90% of observed variance, reflecting significant environmental gradients). Based on these components, an RFM predicted the post-fire recovery with an overall accuracy of 70.5% (Cost-Sensitive Accuracy), Quantity Disagreement of 3.1%, and Allocation Disagreement of 76%, highlighting spatial misallocation as the primary source of errors. The evaluation also identified PC4 (species richness) and PC3 (elevation) as significant predictors, collectively accounting for >50% of the variation in post-fire recovery. In the spatial analysis using LANDIS-II, the growth of vegetation, mainly in mid-altitude areas, was shown to be stronger, with the species consisting of those areas being more diverse. As a result, it demonstrated the connection between species richness and recovery capability. These findings can be useful in developing a management and development strategy, as well as proposing actions for species recovery after fire, such as the construction of firebreaks or the introduction of fireproof species, to make the forest more resistant to weather changes in Mediterranean ecosystems. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Map of the study area, showing the geographical location of the Tenira forest.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Ombrothermic diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Pictures demonstrating forest fire loss in the area: (<b>a</b>) non-burnt area; (<b>b</b>) burnt area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Location of sampling stations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Vegetation layers: (<b>a</b>) tree layer (&gt;4 m), (<b>b</b>) sub-shrub layer (1 m &lt; H &lt; 2 m), (<b>c</b>) shrub layer (2 m &lt; H &lt; 4 m), and (<b>d</b>) herbaceous layer (0 &lt; H &lt; 0.5 m).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Specific richness per station.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Classification of the flora identified by family.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Global biological spectrum (Raunkiaer’s classification).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Global biogeographic spectrum.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Scree plot of variance explained by each principal component.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>PCA bi-plots showing the number (1–13) in figure correspond to individual sampling stations distributed within the study area. Each station corresponds to a specific geographical lo-cation at which vegetation and environmental data were collected. These points are placed ac-cording to their PCA scores, reflecting the relative distance to the environmental variables (blue arrows) and how much each point contributes to the total variance in the data set. This visual mapping enables better understanding of how local environmental gradients, such as elevation, slope, and precipitation, influence post-fire vegetation recovery patterns at each station.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Variable importance in the Random Forest model, measured by the importance score. The score reflects the relative contribution of each principal component (PC1, PC2, and PC3) to the model’s performance, with higher values indicating stronger influence.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Determination of PC1 partial dependence, the figure represents the smoothed partial dependence plot with the blue line as output, demonstrating the model’s predicted recovery level in respect to PC1, and the red line indicates the trend achieved by a linear approximation of the PDP. Both these lines assist in representing the detailed non-linear relationships the model learns and the overall trend of the relationships of PC1 on the level of predicted recovery.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Determination of PC2 partial dependence, The output of the smoothed PDP shows the predicted recovery level based on PC2; the blue line represents this output. The red line represents the general trend, where the model has taken the linear approximation of the PDP. These lines reveal a more thorough un-derstanding of the non-linear relationship that the model depicts (the blue lines) as well as the general direction of the effect PC2 makes on recovery-level predictions (red).</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Spatial distribution of recovery levels in the Tenira forest after the post-fire event. The map has indicated the recovery levels as high (green), medium (yellow), and low (red) as inferred from the model Random Forest, based on the key environmental predictors used, which include precipitation, temperature, slope, and elevation, to indicate the level of variation in vegetation resilience in that area.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 6327 KiB  
Article
Detecting the Lake Area Seasonal Variations in the Tibetan Plateau from Multi-Sensor Satellite Data Using Deep Learning
by Xingyu Chen, Xiuyu Zhang, Changwei Zhuang and Xibang Hu
Water 2025, 17(1), 68; https://doi.org/10.3390/w17010068 - 30 Dec 2024
Viewed by 350
Abstract
Monitoring lake area changes with a higher spatial and temporal resolution can facilitate a more detailed analysis of climate-related changes in the Tibetan Plateau. In the Landsat era, optical remote sensing observation with water body index-based methods mainly contributed to alpine lake investigation. [...] Read more.
Monitoring lake area changes with a higher spatial and temporal resolution can facilitate a more detailed analysis of climate-related changes in the Tibetan Plateau. In the Landsat era, optical remote sensing observation with water body index-based methods mainly contributed to alpine lake investigation. However, monitoring the seasonal or monthly change of a lake area is challenging since optical data are easily contaminated by the high cloud cover in the Tibetan Plateau. To cope with this, we generated new time series datasets including Sentinel-1 Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) and the Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) observations. Meanwhile, we presented an improved deep learning model with spatial and channel attention mechanisms. Based on these datasets, we compared several deep learning models and found that the CloudNet+ had better performance. Taking this architecture as a baseline, we added spatial and channel attention mechanisms to generate our AttCloudNet+ for extracting the lake area. The results revealed that AttCloudNet+ had a better performance compared with the CloudNet+ and other CNNs (e.g., DeepLabv3+, UNet). For the accuracy of the lakeshore prediction, results from AttCloudNet+ demonstrated closer distance to the truth-value than other models. The obtained mean RMSE and MAE were 21.6 and 16.6 m, respectively. In contrast, the mean RMSE and MAE of the DeepLabv3+ were 99.5 and 76.0 m, while the corresponding RMSE and MAE for UNet were 91.1 and 64.9 m. In addition, we found our AttCloudNet+ was more robust than UNet and DeepLabv3+ because AttCloudNet+ is less influenced by the input optical images compared with DeepLabv3+ and UNet. By combining the results from different seasons and satellite sensors, we are capable of generating the complete lake area seasonal dynamics of the 15 largest lakes. The mean correlation coefficient (R2) between our seasonal lake area time series and the water level of LEGOS is 0.81, which is much better than the previous study (0.25). This indicates that our method can be used to monitor lake area seasonal variation, which is important for understanding regional climate change in the Tibetan Plateau and other similar areas. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of New Technology in Water Mapping and Change Analysis)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Locations of the 15 largest lakes in the Tibetan Plateau.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>l</b>) Monthly images of the Sentinel-1 and Landsat-8 OLI B6-SWIR in Selin Co, 2019. A figure that only contains a base map indicated no available data in that month (e.g., right image of (<b>e</b>) and (<b>g</b>–<b>j</b>)).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) The Sentinel-1 image in VV polarization of the Selin Co region in February 2019; (<b>b</b>) zoom-in of the red box region in a; c and d correspond to same area as a and b by using SWIR data of Landsat-8 image; (<b>c</b>) The Landsat-8 SWIR image of the same region in February 2019; (<b>d</b>) zoom-in of the red box region in (<b>c</b>); (<b>e</b>) profiles of the horizontal yellow lines from the Landsat-8 image (orange line) and Sentinel-1image (green line). The gray vertical dashed line denotes the pixel-wise location of the lake boundary.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Flowchart of lake area extraction method with Landsat and Sentinel-1 data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) The extracted lake area of Selin Co using the Sentinel-1 images solely (false positives are indicated by red boxes); (<b>b</b>) the extracted lake area of Selin Co using combined Sentinel-1 and Landsat images.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The comparison between the lake boundary delineated by visual interpretation (green line) in Selin Co and (<b>a</b>) boundary predicted by the AttCloudNet+ using the combined Landsat-Sentinel images, (<b>b</b>) boundary predicted by the LaeNet using the Landsat-8 images. Blue and white patches are lake and land areas predicted by models, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The prediction results of AttCloudNet+ and DeepLabv3+ for combined data after adding optical images at different times; (<b>a</b>,<b>e</b>) the SAR image to be predicted in August 2020, the orange line is the visual interpretation lakeshore; (<b>b</b>–<b>d</b>) prediction results of AttCloudNet+ after supplementing optical images in 2015, 2017, and 2020; (<b>f</b>–<b>h</b>) prediction results of DeepLabv3+ after supplementing optical images in 2015, 2017, and 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) The linear regression between lake area predicted by deep learning models and the LEGOS lake water level in Selin Co lake; (<b>b</b>) the linear regression of WHU in the same region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The comparison between our extracted lake area series (orange line, with the shaded region represents the uncertainties), the LEGOS water level series (light green line), the CAS water level series (dark green line), the annual lake area from the CAS (purple dots), and the lake area series of the WHU (blue line) in Selin Co lake.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>(<b>a</b>) Landsat RGB true-color images (left) and B6-SWIR images (right) of December 2019; (<b>b</b>) Landsat RGB true-color images (left) and B6-SWIR images (right) of January 2020. Most regions were covered by snow in this month; (<b>c</b>–<b>e</b>) snow cover disappeared from February to April 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The radar shadow occurred in the mountainous regions around the Bangongco. The yellow outline is the boundary of the Bangongco.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The original images and classification images using different methods in Selin Co: (<b>a</b>) the RGB true-color image; (<b>b</b>) NDWI; (<b>c</b>) classification image using LaeNet; (<b>d</b>) Sentinel-1 image; (<b>e</b>) classification image using Otsu threshold algorithm. False positives are indicated by arrows; (<b>f</b>) classification image using AttCloudNet+.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 6373 KiB  
Article
Comparisons and Analyses of Thermospheric Mass Densities Derived from Global Navigation Satellite System–Precise Orbit Determination and an Ionization Gauge–Orbital Neutral Atmospheric Detector Onboard a Spherical Satellite at 520 km Altitude
by Yujiao Jin, Xianguo Zhang, Maosheng He, Yongping Li, Xiangguang Meng, Jiangzhao Ai, Bowen Wang, Xinyue Wang and Yueqiang Sun
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(1), 98; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17010098 - 30 Dec 2024
Viewed by 256
Abstract
Thermospheric mass densities are investigated to explore their responses to solar irradiance and geomagnetic activity during the period from 31 October to 7 November 2021. Utilizing data from the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) payload and an ionization gauge mounted on the Orbital [...] Read more.
Thermospheric mass densities are investigated to explore their responses to solar irradiance and geomagnetic activity during the period from 31 October to 7 November 2021. Utilizing data from the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) payload and an ionization gauge mounted on the Orbital Neutral Atmospheric Detector (OAD) payload onboard the QQ-Satellite, thermospheric mass densities are derived through two independent means: precise orbit determination (POD) and pressure measurements. For the first time, observations of these two techniques are compared and analyzed in this study to demonstrate similarities and differences. Both techniques exhibit similar spatial–temporal variations, with clear dependences on local solar time (LT). However, the hemispheric asymmetry is almost absent in simulations from the NRLMSISE-00 and DTM94 models compared with observations. At high latitudes, density enhancements of observations and simulations are shown, characterized by periodic bulge structures. In contrast, only the OAD-derived densities exhibit wave-like disturbances that propagate from two poles to lower latitudes during geomagnetic storm periods, suggesting a connection to traveling atmospheric disturbances (TADs). Over the long term, thermospheric mass densities derived from the two means of POD and the OAD show good agreements, yet prominent discrepancies emerge during specific periods and under different space-weather conditions. We propose possible interpretations as well as suggestions for utilizing these two means. Significantly, neutral winds should be considered in both methods, particularly at high latitudes and under storm conditions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) The QQ-Satellite, and (<b>b</b>) the projections of the QQ-Satellite orbits in a local solar time–latitude frame.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Thermospheric mass densities at (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) dawn and (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>) dusk derived from (<b>a</b>,<b>e</b>) NRLMSISE-00, (<b>b</b>,<b>f</b>) DTM94, (<b>c</b>,<b>g</b>) POD, and (<b>d</b>,<b>h</b>) OAD. The (<b>a</b>,<b>e</b>) black solid line is the daily F10.7 index, and the (<b>a</b>,<b>e</b>) black dashed line is ten times of the daily Kp index.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The evolutions of (<b>a</b>) thermospheric mass densities derived from two means and (<b>b</b>) their ratios, along with the evolutions of (<b>c</b>) F10.7 and (<b>d</b>) Kp indices.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Normal distributions of ratios displayed in <a href="#remotesensing-17-00098-f003" class="html-fig">Figure 3</a>b for (<b>a</b>) all data, and for three periods defined in <a href="#sec3dot2-remotesensing-17-00098" class="html-sec">Section 3.2</a>: (<b>b</b>) increasing period, (<b>c</b>) decreasing period, and (<b>d</b>) transition period.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>,<b>e</b>) Thermospheric mass densities derived from POD and OAD, and (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>,<b>f</b>) their ratios. The O<sub>2</sub>, O<sub>3</sub>, O<sub>50</sub>, O<sub>51</sub>, O<sub>68</sub>, and O<sub>69</sub> indicate the accumulated numbers of the QQ-Satellite’s orbits since 31 October 2021. And the shadows represent the increasing periods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Similar plot to <a href="#remotesensing-17-00098-f005" class="html-fig">Figure 5</a>, except for different satellite orbits. (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>,<b>e</b>) Thermospheric mass densities derived from POD and OAD, and (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>,<b>f</b>) their ratios. And the shadows represent the decreasing periods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Similar plot to <a href="#remotesensing-17-00098-f005" class="html-fig">Figure 5</a>, except for different satellite orbits. (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>,<b>e</b>,<b>g</b>) Thermospheric mass densities derived from POD and OAD, and (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>,<b>f</b>,<b>h</b>) their ratios. And the shadows represent the transition periods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The evolutions of (<b>a</b>) peak densities in the orbital bulge structures from simulations and observations and their (<b>b</b>) enhancements, along with the evolution of (<b>c</b>) the AE index.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Spatial distributions of peak density in bulge structures at (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) dawn (0–8 LT) and at (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>) dusk (16–24 LT), derived from (<b>a</b>,<b>e</b>) NRLMSISE-00, (<b>b</b>,<b>f</b>) DTM94, (<b>c</b>,<b>g</b>) POD, and (<b>d</b>,<b>h</b>) OAD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Statistical distributions in latitudes for bulge peaks derived from (<b>a</b>) NRLMSISE-00, (<b>b</b>) DTM94, (<b>c</b>) POD, and (<b>d</b>) OAD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Ratios of OAD densities during storm periods on 3 November to 5 November relative to a quiet period on 2 November at (<b>a</b>) dawn, 4–8 LT and at (<b>b</b>) dusk, 16–20 LT.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 4500 KiB  
Article
Validation of DSDs of GPM DPR with Ground-Based Disdrometers over the Tianshan Region, China
by Xinyu Lu, Xiuqin Wang, Cheng Li, Yan Liu, Yong Zeng and Hong Huo
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(1), 79; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17010079 - 28 Dec 2024
Viewed by 340
Abstract
The Tianshan Mountains are known as the “Water Tower of Central Asia” and are of significant strategic importance for Xinjiang as well as the Central Asian region. Accurately monitoring the spatiotemporal distribution of precipitation in the Tianshan Mountains is crucial for understanding global [...] Read more.
The Tianshan Mountains are known as the “Water Tower of Central Asia” and are of significant strategic importance for Xinjiang as well as the Central Asian region. Accurately monitoring the spatiotemporal distribution of precipitation in the Tianshan Mountains is crucial for understanding global water cycles and climate change. Raindrop Size Distribution (DSD) parameters play an important role in improving quantitative precipitation estimation with radar and understanding microphysical precipitation processes. In this study, DSD parameters in the Tianshan Mountains were evaluated on the basis of Global Precipitation Measurement mission (GPM) dual-frequency radar data (DPR) and ground-based laser disdrometer observations from 2019 to 2024. With the disdrometer observations as the true values, we performed spatiotemporal matching between the satellite radar and laser disdrometer data. The droplet spectrum parameters retrieved with the GPM dual-frequency radar system were compared with those calculated from the laser disdrometer observations. The reflectivity observations from the GPM DPR in both the Ku and Ka bands (ZKu and ZKa) were greater than the actual observations, with ZKa displaying a greater degree of overestimation than ZKu. In the applied single-frequency retrieval algorithm (SFA), the rainfall parameters retrieved from the Ka band outperformed those retrieved from the Ku band, indicating that the Ka band has stronger detection capability in the Tianshan Mountains area, where light rain predominates. The dual-frequency ratio (DFR), i.e., the differences in the reflectivity of the raindrop spectra obtained from both the Ku and Ka bands, fluctuated more greatly than those of the GPM DPR. DFR is a monotonically increasing function of the mass-weighted mean drop diameter (Dm). Rainfall rate (R) and Dm exhibited a strong positive correlation, and the fitted curve followed a power function distribution. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Atmospheric Remote Sensing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Map of the study area and the locations of the disdrometers.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Scatter plot comparison of GPM DPR and ground disdrometer measurements for (<b>a</b>) Zku and (<b>b</b>) Zka in the Tianshan Mountain region (ZKu<sub>GPM</sub> and ZKu<sub>Disdro,</sub> respectively, represent the reflectivity factors of GPM and disdrometers in the Ku band. ZKa<sub>GPM</sub> and ZKa<sub>Disdro</sub> are the same).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Scatter plot comparison of the GPM DPR and ground disdrometer measurements for R (<b>a</b>), Dm (<b>b</b>), and Nw (<b>c</b>) in the Tianshan Mountain region (R<sub>GPM</sub> and R<sub>Disdro,</sub> respectively, represent the rainfall rates of GPM and disdrometers, while Dm and Nw are the same).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Comparison of the scatter plots of (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Zku, (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) Zka, (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>) R, (<b>g</b>,<b>h</b>) Dm, and (<b>i</b>,<b>j</b>) Nw between the GPM DPR and ground-based disdrometers in the Tianshan Mountain region on the basis of the DFA and SFA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) CC, (<b>b</b>) RB, (<b>c</b>) RMSE, and (<b>d</b>) MAE obtained comparison of the five precipitation parameters (Zku, Zka, R, Dm, and Nw) between the GPM DPR and ground-based disdrometers in the Tianshan Mountain region on the basis of the DFA and SFA (RMSE and MAE are in the same unit of the variable, as reported in the figure).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) CC, (<b>b</b>) RB, (<b>c</b>) RMSE, and (<b>d</b>) MAE obtained comparison of the five precipitation parameters (Zku, Zka, R, Dm, and Nw) between the GPM DPR and ground-based disdrometers in the Tianshan Mountain region for the Ku and Ka bands (RMSE and MAE are in the same unit of the variable, as reported in the figure).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The functional relationships between DFR and Dm (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>), and between DFR and R (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) in the Tianshan Mountains of Xinjiang (DFR<sub>GPM</sub> and DFR<sub>Disdro</sub> represent the differential frequency ratios of GPM and disdrometers, respectively).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Scatter plots of the R-Dm relationships for (<b>a</b>) GPM and (<b>b</b>) disdrometers in the Tianshan Mountains.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Scatter plots of the Nw and Dm relationships for (<b>a</b>) GPM and (<b>b</b>) disdrometers in the Tianshan Mountains.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 7144 KiB  
Article
A Study of NOAA-20 VIIRS Band M1 (0.41 µm) Striping over Clear-Sky Ocean
by Wenhui Wang, Changyong Cao, Slawomir Blonski and Xi Shao
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(1), 74; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17010074 - 28 Dec 2024
Viewed by 215
Abstract
The Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) onboard the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration-20 (NOAA-20) satellite was launched on 18 November 2017. The on-orbit calibration of the NOAA-20 VIIRS visible and near-infrared (VisNIR) bands has been very stable over time. However, NOAA-20 operational [...] Read more.
The Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) onboard the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration-20 (NOAA-20) satellite was launched on 18 November 2017. The on-orbit calibration of the NOAA-20 VIIRS visible and near-infrared (VisNIR) bands has been very stable over time. However, NOAA-20 operational M1 (a dual gain band with a center wavelength of 0.41 µm) sensor data records (SDR) have exhibited persistent scene-dependent striping over clear-sky ocean (high gain, low radiance) since the beginning of the mission, different from other VisNIR bands. This paper studies the root causes of the striping in the operational NOAA-20 M1 SDRs. Two potential factors were analyzed: (1) polarization effect-induced striping over clear-sky ocean and (2) imperfect on-orbit radiometric calibration-induced striping. NOAA-20 M1 is more sensitive to the polarized lights compared to other NOAA-20 short-wavelength bands and the similar bands on the Suomi NPP and NOAA-21 VIIRS, with detector and scan angle-dependent polarization sensitivity up to ~6.4%. The VIIRS M1 top of atmosphere radiance is dominated by Rayleigh scattering over clear-sky ocean and can be up to ~70% polarized. In this study, the impact of the polarization effect on M1 striping was investigated using radiative transfer simulation and a polarization correction method similar to that developed by the NOAA ocean color team. Our results indicate that the prelaunch-measured polarization sensitivity and the polarization correction method work well and can effectively reduce striping over clear-sky ocean scenes by up to ~2% at near nadir zones. Moreover, no significant change in NOAA-20 M1 polarization sensitivity was observed based on the data analyzed in this study. After the correction of the polarization effect, residual M1 striping over clear-sky ocean suggests that there exists half-angle mirror (HAM)-side and detector-dependent striping, which may be caused by on-orbit radiometric calibration errors. HAM-side and detector-dependent striping correction factors were analyzed using deep convective cloud (DCC) observations (low gain, high radiances) and verified over the homogeneous Libya-4 desert site (low gain, mid-level radiance); neither are significantly affected by the polarization effect. The imperfect on-orbit radiometric calibration-induced striping in the NOAA operational M1 SDR has been relatively stable over time. After the correction of the polarization effect, the DCC-based striping correction factors can further reduce striping over clear-sky ocean scenes by ~0.5%. The polarization correction method used in this study is only effective over clear-sky ocean scenes that are dominated by the Rayleigh scattering radiance. The DCC-based striping correction factors work well at all radiance levels; therefore, they can be deployed operationally to improve the quality of NOAA-20 M1 SDRs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection The VIIRS Collection: Calibration, Validation, and Application)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Monthly DCC reflectance (mode) time series for NOAA-20 VIIRS bands M1–M4 from May 2018 to June 2024.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>NOAA-20 M1 (<b>a</b>) detector level relative response (RSR, represented by different colors) functions and (<b>b</b>) operational F-factors on 31 December 2023 (right).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Example of 6SV simulated Stokes vectors (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">I</span>, (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">Q</span>, (<b>c</b>) <span class="html-italic">U</span>, and (<b>d</b>) DoLP for a NOAA-20 VIIRS M1 granule on 9 January 2024 20:36–20:38 UTC (Pacific Coast, latitude: 29.27°, longitude: −116.95°).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>6SV simulated degree of linear polarization (DoLP, unitless) over clear-sky ocean at surface pressure of 1013.5 hPa and wind speed of 5 m/s: (<b>a</b>) DoLP as functions of view zenith angle (VZA) and relative azimuth angle (RAA) at solar zenith angle (SZA) of 22.5°; (<b>b</b>) DoLP as functions of SZA and RAA at VZA of 22.5°.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>6SV simulated DoLP (black dots) for NOAA-20 M1 over clear-sky ocean as a function of scattering angle, at a surface pressure of 1013.5 hPa and a wind speed of 5 m/s. The blue vertical dash line marks the 90° scattering angle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Polar plots of NOAA-20 VIIRS M1 prelaunch polarization sensitivity and phase angle at different scan angles for (<b>a</b>) HAM-A and (<b>b</b>) HAM-B. Polarization sensitivity (unit: percent) is represented by the length of a vector on the polar plot, while polarization phase angle is represented by the direction of the vector. Scan angle is represented by different colors; detector is represented by different symbols.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>NOAA-20 VIIRS M1 detector- and HAM-side-dependent <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>12</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> (left panel) and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>13</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> (right panel) terms as a function of the scan angle, derived using prelaunch characterized polarization amplitude and phase angle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>NOAA-20 M1 striping over a clear-sky ocean scene on 9 January 2024 20:36 UTC: (<b>a</b>) operational SDR image; (<b>b</b>) HAM-side and detector-level reflectance divergence in the operational SDR; (<b>c</b>) operational reflectance ratios between individual detectors and band-averaged value; (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) are similar to (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>), but after applying the polarization correction. The gray horizontal dash lines in (<b>c</b>,<b>f</b>) mark reflectance ratio values of 0.99, 1.00, and 1.01, to assist understanding only.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Similar to <a href="#remotesensing-17-00074-f008" class="html-fig">Figure 8</a>, but for a NOAA-20 M1 clear-sky ocean scene on 23 September 2018 06:12 UTC (Indian Ocean, West Coast of Australia): (<b>a</b>) operational SDR image; (<b>b</b>) HAM-side and detector-level reflectance divergence in the operational SDR; (<b>c</b>) operational reflectance ratios between individual detectors and band-averaged value; (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) are similar to (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>), but after applying the polarization correction. The gray horizontal dash lines in (<b>c</b>,<b>f</b>) mark reflectance ratio values of 0.99, 1.00, and 1.01, to assist understanding only.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Comparison of NOAA-20 M1 DCC-based striping correction factors for (<b>a</b>) considering detector-dependent striping only and (<b>b</b>) considering both HAM-side- and detector-dependent striping.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Impacts of DCC-based striping correction factors for NOAA-20 M1 over the Libyan-4 desert site (30 March 2024, 11:32 UTC): (<b>a</b>) operational SDR image; (<b>b</b>) HAM-side and detector-level reflectance divergence in the operational SDR; (<b>c</b>) operational reflectance ratios between individual detectors and band-averaged value; (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) are similar to (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>), but after applying the DCC-based striping correction. The gray horizontal dash lines in (<b>c</b>,<b>f</b>) mark reflectance ratio values of 0.99, 1.00, and 1.01, to assist understanding only.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Similar to <a href="#remotesensing-17-00074-f008" class="html-fig">Figure 8</a>, but after applying both DCC-based striping correction and polarization correction: (<b>a</b>) SDR image; (<b>b</b>) HAM-side and detector-level reflectance divergence; (<b>c</b>) reflectance ratios between individual detectors and band-averaged value. The gray horizontal dash lines in (<b>c</b>) mark reflectance ratio values of 0.99, 1.00, and 1.01, to assist understanding only.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Similar to <a href="#remotesensing-17-00074-f009" class="html-fig">Figure 9</a>, but after applying both DCC-based striping correction and polarization correction: (<b>a</b>) SDR image; (<b>b</b>) HAM-side and detector-level reflectance divergence; (<b>c</b>) reflectance ratios between individual detectors and band-averaged value. The gray horizontal dash lines in (<b>c</b>) mark reflectance ratio values of 0.99, 1.00, and 1.01, to assist understanding only.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop