[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (747)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = soil respiration

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 925 KiB  
Article
Can Ecological Outcomes Be Used to Assess Soil Health?
by Isabella C. F. Maciel, Guilhermo F. S. Congio, Eloa M. Araujo, Morgan MathisonSlee, Matt R. Raven and Jason E. Rowntree
Environments 2025, 12(3), 85; https://doi.org/10.3390/environments12030085 (registering DOI) - 12 Mar 2025
Abstract
Soil health is typically evaluated using physical, chemical, and biological parameters. However, identifying cost-effective and interpretable metrics remains a challenge. The effectiveness of ecological outcome verification (EOV) in predicting soil health in grazing lands was assessed at 22 ranches. Sixty-four soil samples were [...] Read more.
Soil health is typically evaluated using physical, chemical, and biological parameters. However, identifying cost-effective and interpretable metrics remains a challenge. The effectiveness of ecological outcome verification (EOV) in predicting soil health in grazing lands was assessed at 22 ranches. Sixty-four soil samples were analyzed using the Haney soil health test (HSHT) and phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA). Of 104 variables, 13 were retained following principal component analysis (PCA), including variables associated with plant community, carbon dynamics, and microbial community structure. Soils with enriched microbial and organic matter (SOM) characteristics supported a healthier ecological status, as corroborated by greater EOV scores. Water-extractable organic carbon (WEOC) was positively correlated to plant functional groups, whereas SOM was positively correlated with plant biodiversity and functional groups. Total bacteria were positively correlated with all EOV parameters. Microbial biomass (MB) was positively correlated with both water and energy cycle indexes, whereas arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) was positively correlated with the water cycle. From the multiple regression analyses, water infiltration emerged as a key predictor of soil respiration and WEOC. Overall, the ecological outcomes measured by EOV have the potential to serve as a proxy for soil health, providing a practical tool for producers to make informed land management decisions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Scheme of a 6 ha monitoring site (dotted line) within a given pasture (solid line) including twelve sampling locations (STM protocol, green circles) and the three transects (T1, T2, and T3) of the long-term monitoring (LTM protocol, gray bars) with locations where soil cores (yellow triangles) and water infiltration (red squares) samples were taken.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Principal component analysis biplot of Haney soil heath test and phospholipid fatty acid test parameters, including 32 monitoring sites (blue dots). SR: soil respiration, WEOC: water-extractable organic carbon, SOM: soil organic matter, MB: total microbial biomass, Bacteria: total bacteria, Fungi: total fungi, AMF: arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, SF: saprophytic fungi.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 8696 KiB  
Article
Effects of Microplastics on Selected Earthworm Species
by Marek Klimasz and Anna Grobelak
Toxics 2025, 13(3), 201; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13030201 - 11 Mar 2025
Viewed by 151
Abstract
Microplastics currently pose a serious threat to aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. The high mobility of particles and their diversity in size, material and shape lets them spread widely. Further complicating matters is the ever-expanding plastics industry and modifications to its manufacturing processes. To [...] Read more.
Microplastics currently pose a serious threat to aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. The high mobility of particles and their diversity in size, material and shape lets them spread widely. Further complicating matters is the ever-expanding plastics industry and modifications to its manufacturing processes. To date, many cases of negative, often toxic effects of microplastics on various species such as fish, birds and mammals have been documented. The methodology for measuring and determining the effects of microplastics on soil organisms is still an area of little understanding and certainly requires further study. In our conducted experiment, we reported the effects of selected microplastics in soil (polyethylene, polyethylene terephthalate, polystyrene, polyamide and a mixture of these plastics) at concentrations of 0.1% w/v and 1% w/v at two time intervals, one and three months, on five different earthworm species, identifying the species-related microplastic response. This study investigated the effects of different microplastics on biological parameters such as survival and respiration and biochemical parameters such as effects on glutathione s-transferase (GST), a marker of detoxification and adaptive response in earthworm species Eisenia andrei, Eisenia fetida, Lumbricus terrestris, Apporectoda caliginosa and Dendrobena veneta. The choices of species and the types of microplastic selected are intended to map the occurrence of microplastic contamination in the soil and determine the adaptation of earthworms to changing environmental conditions, considering their ecological significance and functional diversity in soil ecosystems. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Effect of microplastics on GST activity after 1 month of exposure in tested earthworms; statistically significant differences marked with “*”.</p>
Full article ">Figure 1 Cont.
<p>Effect of microplastics on GST activity after 1 month of exposure in tested earthworms; statistically significant differences marked with “*”.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Effects of microplastics on GST activity after 3 months of exposure in tested earthworms; statistically significant differences marked with “*”.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2 Cont.
<p>Effects of microplastics on GST activity after 3 months of exposure in tested earthworms; statistically significant differences marked with “*”.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Effects of microplastics on respiration after 1 month of exposure in tested earthworms; mg CO<sub>2</sub> emitted per g of live worms and per hour.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3 Cont.
<p>Effects of microplastics on respiration after 1 month of exposure in tested earthworms; mg CO<sub>2</sub> emitted per g of live worms and per hour.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Effects of microplastics on respiration in tested earthworms after 3 months of exposure; mg CO<sub>2</sub> emitted per g of live worms and per hour.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4 Cont.
<p>Effects of microplastics on respiration in tested earthworms after 3 months of exposure; mg CO<sub>2</sub> emitted per g of live worms and per hour.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Effect of microplastics on individual survival in tested earthworms.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5 Cont.
<p>Effect of microplastics on individual survival in tested earthworms.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 4216 KiB  
Article
Changes in Soil Properties Under the Influence of Microplastics in Plastic and Open Field Production in Three Serbian Valleys
by Elmira Saljnikov, Tara Grujić, Marina Jovković, Veljko Perović, Dragan Čakmak, Aigul Zhapparova, Vesela Radović, Slobodan Stefanović, Vladimir Miladinović, Slađan Stanković, Žaklina Marjanović, Sayagul Kenzhegulova, Aigul Tleppayeva, Gulya Kunypiyaeva and Slobodan Krnjajić
Horticulturae 2025, 11(3), 305; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11030305 (registering DOI) - 11 Mar 2025
Viewed by 98
Abstract
Crop production in plastic greenhouses is one of the major sources of plastic pollution worldwide. The main hypothesis of this study is that the regular use of mulch film in greenhouses leads to the cumulative accumulation of microplastic particles (MPs) in the soil, [...] Read more.
Crop production in plastic greenhouses is one of the major sources of plastic pollution worldwide. The main hypothesis of this study is that the regular use of mulch film in greenhouses leads to the cumulative accumulation of microplastic particles (MPs) in the soil, which ultimately leads to changes in the soil properties. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to identify the possible changes in the physical, chemical, and biological properties of soil in greenhouses in three regions of Serbia. The following chemical parameters were determined: electrical conductivity, soil acidity, cation exchange capacity (CEC), total carbon (TC) and nitrogen (TN) content, plant-available phosphorus and potassium content, and trace element content. The following physical parameters were determined: particle size distribution, volumetric mass, specific mass, and porosity; the biological parameters that were determined were microbial respiration and labile carbon. The obtained data were processed using network analysis (NA) to identify the complex relationships between MP content and soil parameters. The NA results support the main findings that the presence of microplastics leads to the destruction of soil structure, which reduces bulk density and increases soil porosity. A strong positive correlation of MPs with soil particles < 0.02 mm and a negative correlation with CEC were found. In the Danube Valley, soil respiration was 78% higher in the open ground compared to a plastic greenhouse. The results contribute to a better understanding of the influence of MPs on soil properties and its ecological functions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Vegetable Production Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Wild plastic waste discharge at a forest stream near the sampling site at the Morava River basin, May 2022 (photo by E. Saljnikov).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Studied locations: Sava River valley (Jakovo town); Danube River valley (Smederevo town); and south Morava River valley (Leskovac town), Serbia.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Example of a sampling location: the greenhouse (<b>a</b>) and adjacent open field (<b>b</b>) in the Morava River Valley, 2022 (photo by E. Saljnikov).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Content of microplastics (g/kg) in the soil of the greenhouse and open fields from three locations in Serbia, where JakPL and JakCON represent the greenhouse and open-field at the Sava River site, respectively; SmePL and SmeCON represent the greenhouse and open field at the Danube River site; and LesPL and LesCON represent the greenhouse and open field at the south Morava River site.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Network structure and centrality measure in open fields: (<b>a</b>) network structure of the soil indicator nodes; (<b>b</b>) centrality (strength) plot. Blue lines represent positive relationships; red lines indicate negative relationships. The variations in the intensity and thickness of the lines illustrate these relationships.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Network structure and centrality measure in greenhouses: (<b>a</b>) network structure of the soil indicator nodes; (<b>b</b>) centrality (strength) plot. Blue lines represent positive relationships; red lines indicate negative relationships. The variations in the intensity and thickness of the lines illustrate these relationships.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 1966 KiB  
Article
Long-Term Effects of Biochar Application on Soil Heterotrophic Respiration in a Warm–Temperate Oak Forest
by Shinpei Yoshitake, Kakuya Enichi, Yuki Tsukimori, Toshiyuki Ohtsuka, Hiroshi Koizumi and Mitsutoshi Tomotsune
Forests 2025, 16(3), 489; https://doi.org/10.3390/f16030489 (registering DOI) - 11 Mar 2025
Viewed by 29
Abstract
Biochar application as a soil amendment is gaining attention as a stable, long-term carbon sequestration strategy for the mitigation of climate change. However, biochar applied to the soil may increase soil carbon efflux. This study aimed to determine the long-term (8 years) effects [...] Read more.
Biochar application as a soil amendment is gaining attention as a stable, long-term carbon sequestration strategy for the mitigation of climate change. However, biochar applied to the soil may increase soil carbon efflux. This study aimed to determine the long-term (8 years) effects of biochar application to the forest floor on soil carbon effluxes (soil respiration [SR] and heterotrophic respiration [HR]) in a warm–temperate oak forest. Biochar was applied at the rate of 0, 5, or 10 Mg ha−1 to 20 m × 20 m plots (n = 4). The SR and HR rates were determined using the closed chamber method and the trenching method. The annual SR tended to increase over 8 years following biochar application, whereas a significant increase in the annual HR (+31%–37%) was observed in the short term (<3 years). The increased HR likely included CO2 emissions from the decomposition of the labile fraction of biochar carbon and from the microbial decomposition of the original soil organic matter stimulated through changes in the soil physicochemical environment, such as soil moisture and pH. The results suggest that a short-term increase in HR should be considered in the evaluation of carbon sequestration in response to biochar addition to forest ecosystems. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Temporal changes in (<b>a</b>) soil respiration rate (<span class="html-italic">R</span><sub>S</sub>) and (<b>b</b>) heterotrophic respiration rate (<span class="html-italic">R</span><sub>H</sub>) in the plots with or without biochar. C0, C5, and C10 represent the experimental plots with 0, 5, and 10 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> biochar application, respectively. Values are means (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3–4).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Temporal changes in (<b>a</b>) soil temperature and (<b>b</b>) soil moisture (volumetric soil water content) recorded during the respiration measurements in plots with or without biochar. C0, C5, and C10 represent experimental plots with 0, 5, and 10 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> biochar application, respectively. Values are means (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3–4).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Soil pH in plots with or without biochar. C0, C5, and C10 represent experimental plots with 0, 5, and 10 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> biochar application, respectively. Bars and error bars indicate the mean ± SD (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 4). Bars labeled with different lowercase letters differ significantly (Tukey’s test, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Soil microbial biomass carbon determined with the adenosine triphosphate method in plots with or without biochar. C0, C5, and C10 represent experimental plots with 0, 5, and 10 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> biochar application, respectively. Bars and error bars represent the mean ± SD (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 4). Bars labeled with different lowercase letters differ significantly (Tukey’s test, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). n.d., not determined.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Annual soil respiration (SR) and (<b>b</b>) annual heterotrophic respiration (HR) in the plots with or without biochar from the second to the eighth year. C0, C5, and C10 represent the experimental plots with 0, 5, and 10 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> biochar application, respectively. Bars and error bars represent the mean ± SD (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 4). Bars labeled with different lowercase letters differ significantly (Tukey’s test, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). n.d., not determined.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 2579 KiB  
Article
Carbon Dioxide Fluxes Associated with Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Communities in Ice-Free Areas on King George Island, Maritime Antarctica
by Luiz H. Rosa, Vívian N. Gonçalves, Débora Luiza Costa Barreto, Marcio Rocha Francelino, Clara Glória Oliveira Baldi, Danilo Cesar Mello, Kárita C. R. Santos, Fabyano A. C. Lopes, Micheline Carvalho-Silva, Peter Convey and Paulo E. A. S. Câmara
DNA 2025, 5(1), 15; https://doi.org/10.3390/dna5010015 - 10 Mar 2025
Viewed by 177
Abstract
Background and Methods: We assessed the prokaryotic and eukaryotic diversity present in non-vegetated and vegetated soils on King George Island, Maritime Antarctic, in combination with measurements of carbon dioxide fluxes. Results: For prokaryotes, 381 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were assigned, dominated by the [...] Read more.
Background and Methods: We assessed the prokaryotic and eukaryotic diversity present in non-vegetated and vegetated soils on King George Island, Maritime Antarctic, in combination with measurements of carbon dioxide fluxes. Results: For prokaryotes, 381 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were assigned, dominated by the phyla Actinobacteriota, Acidobacteriota, Pseudomonadota, Chloroflexota, and Verrucomicrobiota. A total of 432 eukaryotic ASVs were assigned, including representatives from seven kingdoms and 21 phyla. Fungi dominated the eukaryotic communities, followed by Viridiplantae. Non-vegetated soils had higher diversity indices compared with vegetated soils. The dominant prokaryotic ASV in non-vegetated soils was Pyrinomonadaceae sp., while Pseudarthrobacter sp. dominated vegetated soils. Mortierella antarctica (Fungi) and Meyerella sp. (Viridiplantae) were dominant eukaryotic taxa in the non-vegetated soils, while Lachnum sp. (Fungi) and Polytrichaceae sp. (Viridiplantae) were dominant in the vegetated soils. Measured CO2 fluxes indicated that the net ecosystem exchange values measured in vegetated soils were lower than ecosystem respiration in non-vegetated soils. However, the total flux values indicated that the region displayed positive ecosystem respiration values, suggesting that the soils may represent a source of CO2 in the atmosphere. Conclusions: Our study revealed the presence of rich and complex communities of prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms in both soil types. Although non-vegetated soils demonstrated the highest levels of diversity, they had lower CO2 fluxes than vegetated soils, likely reflecting the significant biomass of photosynthetically active plants (mainly dense moss carpets) and their resident organisms. The greater diversity detected in exposed soils may influence future changes in CO2 flux in the studied region, for which comparisons of non-vegetated and vegetated soils with different microbial diversities are needed. This reinforces the necessity for studies to monitor the impact of resident biota on CO2 flux in different areas of Maritime Antarctica, a region strongly impacted by climatic changes. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Soil sample collection locations on the Keller Peninsula, King George Island. (<b>a</b>) The South Shetland Islands, Maritime Antarctic; (<b>b</b>) King George Island; (<b>c</b>) Keller Peninsula in Admiralty Bay; (<b>d</b>) oblique aerial photograph of Keller Peninsula; (<b>e</b>) paraglacial region (red rectangle) at Keller Peninsula where the samples were obtained (62°5′23.695″ S; 58°24′24.162″ W); (<b>f</b>) vegetated soil; and (<b>g</b>) non-vegetated soil. Photo d by L. H. Rosa; photos e and g M.R. Francelino.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Krona chart illustrating the prokaryotic ASVs detected across all seven soil samples obtained on Keller Peninsula, King George Island.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Krona chart illustrating the eukaryotic taxa assigned across the seven sampling sites on Keller Peninsula, King George Island.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Venn diagrams showing the distribution of (<b>a</b>) prokaryotic and (<b>b</b>) eukaryotic assemblages across the non-vegetated and vegetated soil samples obtained on Keller Peninsula, King George Island.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Measured values of carbon dioxide fluxes for non-vegetated soil and vegetated soil.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 2737 KiB  
Article
Effects of Wood-Derived Biochar on Soil Respiration of a European Beech Forest Under Current Climate and Simulated Climate Change
by Andrea Vannini, Debora Tarasconi, Federico Pietropoli, T’ai Gladys Whittingham Forte, Filippo Grillo, Michele Carbognani and Alessandro Petraglia
Forests 2025, 16(3), 474; https://doi.org/10.3390/f16030474 - 8 Mar 2025
Viewed by 375
Abstract
Biochar (BCH) amendments represent a valuable strategy for increasing forest carbon stock, but their effects on soil respiration of beech forests under climate change are largely unknown. We conducted a short-term mesocosm experiment investigating the impact of BCH applications (0%, 10%, 20%, and [...] Read more.
Biochar (BCH) amendments represent a valuable strategy for increasing forest carbon stock, but their effects on soil respiration of beech forests under climate change are largely unknown. We conducted a short-term mesocosm experiment investigating the impact of BCH applications (0%, 10%, 20%, and 50%, v/v) on respiration of a European beech forest soil in N-Italy. The experiment, carried out in Parma, was conducted under both ambient and modified climatic conditions, involving higher soil temperatures (c. +1 K) and reduced precipitation (−50%). The experiment was performed during autumn 2022 and repeated in spring 2023, periods representing late and early summer, respectively. Soil respiration significantly increased with BCH applications when compared to controls, irrespective of the percentage applied. The highest values were recorded in the 20% amendment, while values were significantly lower in BCH 50%, similar to those recorded in BCH 10%. Although soil respiration and soil temperature were positively correlated, no effect of simulated warming was observed. No effects of precipitation reduction were also found, despite respiration being significantly influenced by soil moisture. These results provide an initial insight into the potentially negligible impact of BCH applications on soil respiration in European beech forests under both current and future climate scenarios. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Schematic representation of pot arrangement in each of the 10 experimental blocks. The white circle indicates a half-filled pot, filled only with soil (halfBC) or only with biochar (halfBCH). Colored circles indicate different treatments: BC—unamended control soil; B10—soil amended with 10% BCH (<span class="html-italic">v</span>/<span class="html-italic">v</span>); B20—soil amended with 20% BCH (<span class="html-italic">v</span>/<span class="html-italic">v</span>); B50—soil amended with 50% BCH (<span class="html-italic">v</span>/<span class="html-italic">v</span>). In each block, the eight BCH-amended pots are arranged as follows: four pots undergoing full irrigation (F) and the remaining four pots subjected to “drought” irrigation (D).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic representation of the experimental set-up, illustrating the aluminum structure supporting the nylon sheet cover. On the left, the area beneath the shelter is shown with the 10 blocks where pots were located: nW—blocks without open top chambers (OTCs); W—blocks with OTCs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Respiration rates (g (CO<sub>2</sub>) m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>) of beech forest soils amended with different BCH application percentages: 0% (BC), 10% (B10), 20% (B20), and 50% (B50). Black lines indicate mean values, whereas gray bands indicate 95% confidence intervals. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). Estimates are based on a linear mixed-effect models including biochar amendment as fixed effect, measurement date nested within period as random effects, a variance structure allowing different variation among fixed effect levels, and a variance structure modeling residuals as exponential function of the fitted values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Effects of soil temperature (°C) on respiration rates (g (CO<sub>2</sub>) m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>) of beech forest soils amended with different biochar application percentages in each of the two investigated seasons (fall and spring). Slope estimates for controls are reported, with <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values of the comparison with null slope (for fall) and with fall slope (for spring). Black, dashed lines indicate estimated relationships, whereas gray bands indicate 95% confidence intervals. Estimates are based on a linear mixed-effect model including biochar amendment, soil temperature, soil moisture, and the interaction between biochar amendment and soil temperature as fixed effects, measurement date crossed with pot identity as random effects, and a variance structure allowing different variation among biochar amendment levels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Effects of soil moisture (g (H<sub>2</sub>O) per pot) on respiration rates (g (CO<sub>2</sub>) m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>) of beech forest soils amended with different biochar application percentages in each of the two investigated seasons (fall and spring). Slope estimates for controls are reported, with <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values of the comparison with null slope (for fall) and with fall slope (for spring). Black, dashed lines indicate estimated relationships, whereas gray bands indicate 95% confidence intervals. Estimates are based on a linear mixed-effect model including biochar amendment, soil temperature, soil moisture, and the interaction between biochar amendment and soil temperature as fixed effects, measurement date crossed with pot identity as random effects, and a variance structure allowing different variation among biochar amendment levels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Effects of soil temperature (°C) on respiration rates (g (CO<sub>2</sub>) m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>) of beech forest soils amended with different biochar application percentages, i.e., 0% (BC), 10% (B10), 20% (B20), and 50% (B50). Slope estimates for fall are reported, with <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values of the comparison with null slope (for BC) and with BC slope (for biochar amendments). Black, dashed lines indicate estimated relationships, whereas gray bands indicate 95% confidence intervals. Estimates are based on a linear mixed-effect model including biochar amendment, soil temperature, soil moisture, and the interaction between biochar amendment and soil temperature as fixed effects, measurement date crossed with pot identity as random effects, and a variance structure allowing different variation among biochar amendment levels.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Respiration rates (g (CO<sub>2</sub>) m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>) of European beech forest soils amended with different biochar application rates (<b>A</b>) in each of the two investigated seasons (fall and spring) and as a function of (<b>B</b>) soil temperature (°C) and (<b>C</b>) soil moisture (g (H<sub>2</sub>O) per pot).</p>
Full article ">Figure A2
<p>Average respiration rates (g (CO<sub>2</sub>) m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>) of pots entirely filled with European beech forest soil (BC) and soil amended with 50% biochar (B50) and pots only half-filled only with soil (half-BC) or only with biochar (half-BCH).</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 5418 KiB  
Article
Modeling of CO2 Efflux from Forest and Grassland Soils Depending on Weather Conditions
by Sergey Kivalov, Irina Kurganova, Sergey Bykhovets, Dmitriy Khoroshaev, Valentin Lopes de Gerenyu, Yiping Wu, Tatiana Myakshina, Yakov Kuzyakov and Irina Priputina
Soil Syst. 2025, 9(1), 25; https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems9010025 - 6 Mar 2025
Viewed by 204
Abstract
Carbon dioxide (CO2) efflux from soil (or soil respiration, SR) is one of the most important yet variable characteristics of soil. When evaluating large areas, CO2 efflux modeling serves as a viable alternative to direct measurements. This research aims to [...] Read more.
Carbon dioxide (CO2) efflux from soil (or soil respiration, SR) is one of the most important yet variable characteristics of soil. When evaluating large areas, CO2 efflux modeling serves as a viable alternative to direct measurements. This research aims to identify site-specific differences and their effects on empirical CO2 efflux modeling. The experimental data from 25 years of field observations were utilized to identify the optimal site- and weather-specific models, parameterized for normal, wet, and dry years, for the forest and grassland ecosystems located on similar Entic Podzols (Arenic) in the same bioclimatic coniferous–deciduous forest zone. The following parameters were considered in the examined models: mean monthly soil or air temperatures (Tsoil and Tair), amount of precipitation during the current (P) and the previous (PP) months, and the storage of soil organic carbon (SOC) in the top 20 cm of soil. The weighted non-linear regression method was employed to estimate the model parameters for the normal, wet, and dry years. To increase the magnitude of the model resolutions, we controlled the slope and intercept of the linear model comparison between the measured and modeled data through the change in R0—CO2 efflux at Tsoil = 0 °C. The mean bias error (MBE), root-mean-square error (RMSE), and determination coefficient (R2) were employed to assess the quality of the model’s performance. The measured Tsoil, Tair, and P, as well as the litter (for forest) or sod (for grassland) horizon (modeled by the Soil SCLmate Statistical Simulator (SCLISS)), and soil temperatures (Tlit_m, Tsoil_m) and moistures (Mlit_m, Msoil_m), were used for SR simulation. For the CO2 efflux in the forest ecosystem with the lower SOC availability for mineralization, the direct Tsoil and Tair measurements in combination with SOC storage provided better parameterization for the empirical TPPC model. For the CO2 efflux in the grassland ecosystem with the high SOC availability for mineralization, the temperature became the governing factor, and the TPPrh model provided better performance over all the considered models. The model’s performance was the best for the wet years, and the worst for the dry years for both ecosystems. For forest ecosystems, the model performance for average precipitation years was equivalent to that in wet years. For grassland ecosystems, however, the model performance was equivalent to that in dry years due to differing exposure and hydrothermal regimes. The wet-year R0 obtained for both forest and grassland ecosystems differed from the normal- and dry-year values. The measured SR values relevant for the R0 estimations distribute along the precipitation range for the forest and along the temperature range for the grassland. The SCLISS-modeled Tlit_m and Mlit_m provide good alternatives to direct atmospheric measurements, and can be used as initial temperature and moisture data for CO2 efflux modeling when direct soil and moisture observations are not available on site. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Forest and grassland sites’ soil profiles: (<b>a</b>) For the forest site, (<b>b</b>) for the grassland site; the gleyic color below 70 cm depth is due to the stagnic water conditions for the grassland site.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Comparison among the measured air (Tair, black circles and lines) and SCLISS-modeled litter/sod and soil (Tlit_m, red lines; Tsoil_m, blue lines) temperatures with the measured soil temperature (Tsoil) for forest and grassland sites; the vertical dashed line is the Tsoil = 2 °C threshold when the average Tair = 0 °C.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Comparison of the SCLISS-modeled litter or sod horizon (Mlit_m) and soil (Msoil_m) moisture with measured precipitation (Prec) at Danki (<b>a</b>) and measured soil moisture (W, % by mass) at the grassland site (<b>b</b>): red circles—Mlit_m (% by volume); blue circles—Msoil_m (% by volume).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Measured CO<sub>2</sub> efflux (SR)–precipitation (Prec) dependency for the 0 &lt; Tsoil &lt; 1 °C for Entic Podzol under forest (<b>left</b>) and grassland (<b>right</b>) with the obtained R<sub>0</sub> (g C m<sup>−2</sup> day<sup>−1</sup>) for normal (green), dry (brown), and wet (blue) years—horizontal lines. Labels show months with their monthly precipitation: red (11 &lt; Prec &lt; 34 mm), brown (34 &lt; Prec &lt; 57 mm), yellow (57 &lt; Prec &lt; 80 mm), green (80 &lt; Prec &lt; 103 mm), and blue (103 &lt; Prec &lt;126 mm); numbers near colored cycles show individual values in October (10), November (11) and December (12).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Measured CO<sub>2</sub> efflux (SR)–soil temperature (Tsoil) dependency for the 0 &lt; Tsoil &lt; 1 °C for Entic Podzol under forest (<b>left</b>) and grassland (<b>right</b>) sites with the obtained R<sub>0</sub> values (g C m<sup>−2</sup> day<sup>−1</sup>) for normal (green), dry (brown), and wet (blue) years—horizontal lines. Labels show months with their measured soil temperatures: blue (0 &lt; Tsoil &lt; 0.2 °C), green (0.2 &lt; Tsoil &lt; 0.4 °C), yellow (0.4 &lt; Tsoil &lt; 0.6 °C), brown (0.6 &lt; Tsoil &lt; 0.8 °C), and red (0.8 &lt; Tsoil &lt; 1 °C); numbers near colored cycles are individual in October (10), November (11) and December (12).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The TPPC model CO<sub>2</sub> efflux comparisons (SR<sub>TPPC</sub>) between the weather-specific model (red) and the all-weather model (green for normal, brown for dry, and blue for wet conditions) against the measured CO<sub>2</sub> efflux data (SRmeas) with the respective regressions; for the measured soil and air and modeled litterM and soilM parameterizations; for the forest (<b>left</b>) and the grassland (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The TPPrh model CO<sub>2</sub> efflux comparisons (SR<sub>TPPrh</sub>) between the weather-specific model (red) and the all-weather model (green for normal, orange for dry, and blue for wet conditions) against the measured CO<sub>2</sub> efflux data (SRmeas) with the respective regressions; for the measured soil and air and modeled litterM and soilM parameterizations; for the forest (<b>left</b>) and the grassland (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Comparison of the weather-specific TPPC_nwd (<b>top</b>) or TPPrh_nwd (<b>bottom</b>) model performances parameterized by the Tair−Prec (blue), Tsoil−Prec (red), and Tlit_m−Mlit_m (brown) and their variations from the measurements taken for the cold and warm periods for the forest site; measured CO<sub>2</sub> efflux—the thick black line; spatial variability of measurements—the thin black lines; normal (light green), dry (beige), and wet (light blue) years.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparison of the weather-specific TPPC_nwd (<b>top</b>) or TPPrh_nwd (<b>bottom</b>) model performances parameterized by the Tair−Prec (blue), Tsoil−Prec (red), and Tlit_m−Mlit_m (brown) and their variation from the measurements taken for the cold and warm periods for the grassland site; measured CO<sub>2</sub> efflux—the thick black line; spatial variability of measurements—the thin black lines; normal (light green), dry (beige), and wet (light blue) years.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Monthly precipitation distribution over the monthly temperature range of soil (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) and air (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) during the year for the normal (green), dry (brown), and wet (blue) years; colored dots—individual monthly measurements; colored lines—trends for the respective conditions; for forest (<b>left</b>) and grassland (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Soil temperature (Tsoil)–precipitation (Prec) diagram of the measured CO<sub>2</sub> efflux (SR) (colored dots) (g C m<sup>−2</sup> day<sup>−1</sup>): blue (0.1 &lt; SR &lt; 0.51 °C), green (0.51 &lt; SR &lt; 0.92 °C), yellow (0.92 &lt; SR &lt; 1.34 °C), brown (1.34 &lt; SR &lt; 1.75 °C), and red (1.75 &lt; SR &lt; 2.16 °C). Ellipses—confidence (40%) locations of the <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>-related measured CO<sub>2</sub> efflux clouds for the normal (green), wet (blue), and dry (brown) conditions.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 879 KiB  
Article
Comparing Effects of Soil Amendments on Plant Growth and Microbial Activity in Metal-Contaminated Soils
by Sylwia Siebielec and Grzegorz Siebielec
Sustainability 2025, 17(5), 2135; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17052135 - 1 Mar 2025
Viewed by 254
Abstract
Phytostabilization of metals involves the inactivation of metals in the soil through the use of various materials as soil amendments, which reduces the bioavailability of metals, and then the introduction of vegetation. There are limited data comparing the effectiveness of different phytostabilization amendments [...] Read more.
Phytostabilization of metals involves the inactivation of metals in the soil through the use of various materials as soil amendments, which reduces the bioavailability of metals, and then the introduction of vegetation. There are limited data comparing the effectiveness of different phytostabilization amendments under the same soil and environmental conditions. Therefore, the aim of this research was to compare the effectiveness of a range of soil amendments on reducing the extractability of metals, metal uptake by plants, microbial activity in soil and nutrient availability to plants. Eight materials potentially limiting metal availability were used in a pot experiment: two composts (CG, CM), municipal biosolids (SB), bentonite (BEN), phosphorus fertilizer (PF), amorphous iron oxide (FE), waste rock material (WR), calcium carbonate (LM); and these materials were compared with typical fertilization (NPK) and an untreated soil as the control (CTL). The following trace metal-contaminated soils were used in the pot experiment: soil taken from the area of strong dust fall from the zinc and lead smelter (soil P); soil taken from an outcrop of ore-bearing rocks near a smelter waste heap (soil H); soil artificially polluted through smelter dust spill in the 1990s (soil S). In general, the greatest yields of plants (oat and white mustard) were recorded for compost-treated soils. Changes in the solubility of zinc (Zn) and cadmium (Cd) after the application of various amendments largely reflected changes in soil pH. Biosolids caused a significant increase in extractable Zn and Cd, which was related to the decrease in soil pH, while a significant reduction in Cd extractability was observed across soils after the application of both composts, especially the compost characterized by alkaline pH. Interestingly, low extractability of Cd in the soil with the addition of another compost was observed, despite the pH decrease, as compared to the control pots. This fact proves the high sorption capacity of the compost towards Cd. The microbiological analyses revealed the highly beneficial effect of composts for dehydrogenases and nitrification activities, and for soil respiration, whereas soil amendment with iron oxide caused an increase in respiration activity across soils. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The influence of soil amendments on metal extractability in Ca-nitrate after first harvest (90 days after mixing) in soils P, H and S. First row: Cd extractability (mg kg<sup>−1</sup>), second row: Zn extractability (mg kg<sup>−1</sup>). Means marked with the same letter do not differ significantly across the treatments (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3) according to the Tukey test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The relationships between soil pH (<b>left</b>) and Zn extractability (<b>right</b>) and nitrification activity in soil S as an effect of soil amendments.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 2770 KiB  
Article
Carbon Absorption Potential of Abandoned Rice Paddy Fields in Korea
by Chang-Seok Lee, Bong-Soon Lim and Ji-Eun Seok
Sustainability 2025, 17(5), 2054; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17052054 - 27 Feb 2025
Viewed by 289
Abstract
Over time, the vegetation of abandoned rice paddy fields is succeeded by communities of willow (Salix pierotii Miq.). This study was carried out to confirm the potential for future carbon farming by evaluating the carbon absorption capacity of willow communities restored passively [...] Read more.
Over time, the vegetation of abandoned rice paddy fields is succeeded by communities of willow (Salix pierotii Miq.). This study was carried out to confirm the potential for future carbon farming by evaluating the carbon absorption capacity of willow communities restored passively in abandoned rice paddy fields. The net primary productivity (NPP) of willow communities established in abandoned rice paddy fields in three areas of central Korea (Cheongju, Andong, and Buyeo) was determined. The NPP was obtained by combining the diameter growth of willow individuals and the density of willow stands, yielding 24.36, 19.74, and 38.69 tons·ha−1·yr−1, respectively, and the average NPP of the three sites was 27.62 tons·ha−1·yr−1. The carbon-based NPP calculated from the average NPP at the three sites was 13.81 tons·C·ha−1·yr−1, and the amount of heterotrophic respiration, which is the respiration of microorganisms and animals in the soil, measured in abandoned rice paddy fields in Cheongju was 5.25 tons·C·ha−1·yr−1. As a result, the net ecosystem production (NEP) of the willow communities established in the abandoned rice paddy fields was calculated as 8.56 tons·C·ha−1·yr−1. By substituting this NEP value into the area of abandoned rice paddy fields so far, the carbon dioxide absorption capacity of abandoned rice paddy fields was estimated to exceed 19 million·tons·yr−1. This amount is high enough to account for 77% of the total forecasted carbon absorption capacity in 2050, which is the year Korea aims to achieve carbon neutrality. In this regard, carbon farming using abandoned rice paddy fields is evaluated as a promising project. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Development of Agricultural Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>A map showing the study areas.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>DCA ordination of the stands based on vegetation data collected from abandoned rice paddy fields with different abandonment histories across the central part of the Republic of Korea. Pa: <span class="html-italic">Phragmites australis</span>, Pt: <span class="html-italic">Persicaria thunbergii</span>, To: <span class="html-italic">Typha orientalis</span>, Sp: <span class="html-italic">Salix pierotii</span>, Sp (present): <span class="html-italic">S. pierotii</span> stands selected for this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>An allometric equation derived from the correlation between the diameter at breast height (DBH) and the dry weight of the willows excavated at the Cheongju study site [<a href="#B38-sustainability-17-02054" class="html-bibr">38</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Cumulative diameter growth of <span class="html-italic">S. pierotii</span> at three study sites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Changes in annual diameter growth of <span class="html-italic">S. pierotii</span> trees at three study sites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Changes in the NPP of <span class="html-italic">S. pierotii</span> trees at three study sites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Seasonal variation in monthly mean soil respiration in <span class="html-italic">S. pierotii</span> communities established in the abandoned rice paddy fields of Cheongju. Bars indicate standard errors of mean soil respiration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Scatter plots of observed soil respiration vs. temperatures (°C) measured in air (1.5 m height) and soil (0.5 cm depth) in the <span class="html-italic">S. pierotii</span> communities established in the abandoned rice paddy fields of Cheongju.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>A change in the area of rice paddy fields in the Republic of Korea.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>A yearly change in the area of abandoned rice paddy fields in the Republic of Korea.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 8809 KiB  
Article
Soil Respiration Characteristics and Karst Carbon Sink Potential in Woodlands and Grasslands
by Ning Zhang, Qiong Xiao, Yongli Guo, Fajia Chen, Pingan Sun, Ying Miao and Cheng Zhang
Forests 2025, 16(3), 424; https://doi.org/10.3390/f16030424 - 26 Feb 2025
Viewed by 218
Abstract
The weathering of carbonate rocks consumes significant amounts of soil CO2, contributing to both direct source reduction and to the enhancement of carbon sinks. This process holds substantial potential as a carbon sink, making it a critical strategy for achieving carbon [...] Read more.
The weathering of carbonate rocks consumes significant amounts of soil CO2, contributing to both direct source reduction and to the enhancement of carbon sinks. This process holds substantial potential as a carbon sink, making it a critical strategy for achieving carbon neutrality and mitigating climate change. However, the control mechanisms for the reverse assessment of karst carbon sinks, with soil CO2 as the core at the input end of karstification, are unclear. By comparing soil respiration and its δ13C values between karst and non-karst regions, we analyzed the impact of karstification on soil respiration. In this study, we examined the karst grassland (KG), woodland (KW), and non-karst woodland (NKW) in the karst region with identical climate conditions as the research subject, analyzing the differences in soil respiration rate (RS), flux (SRF), and isotope δ13C under different land-use types, and comparing them with the non-karst region to reveal the carbon sink potential of karstification in reducing carbon emissions. The results showed that after the land-use change from KG to KW in the karst region, the annual mean values of the RS and SRF increased by 55.50% and 20.94%, respectively. Additionally, the annual mean values of the soil respiration contribution to carbonate weathering in KG were approximately 8.2% higher than those in KW. In contrast, the annual mean values of RS and SRF in KW were 25.14% and 41.80% lower than those in NKW, respectively. Furthermore, the soil respiration participation in carbonate weathering in KW was about 8.9% of that in NKW. Land use change can significantly influence karst carbon sinks, with the KG exhibiting the highest carbon sink capacity. Karst soils play a crucial role in reducing atmospheric CO2 levels and facilitating regional carbon neutralization. Therefore, the karst systems play a pivotal role in mitigating the “land use change term” (source term, ELUC) in the global carbon balance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Karst Environment and Global Change)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Land use of study area and location of study sites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Changes in environmental factors and background levels of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentration. (<b>a</b>) Monthly variation in temperature. (<b>b</b>) Monthly variation in precipitation (<b>c</b>) Monthly variation in atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> at KG. (<b>d</b>) Monthly variation in atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> at KW. (<b>e</b>) Monthly variation in atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> at NKW.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Monthly Variation Trends and comparisons of RS in KG, KW, and NKW (<b>a</b>); Violin Plots of RS in KG, KW, and NKW During the Dry and Rainy Seasons (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Monthly Trends of SRS in KG, KW, and NKW (<b>a</b>); Violin Plots of SFR for Different Land Use Types During the Dry and Rainy Seasons (<b>b</b>); Violin Plots of SFR for Karst and Non-Karst Areas During the Dry and Rainy Seasons (<b>c</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Temporal changes in the δ<sup>13</sup>C of headspace carbon dioxide within chambers during the 0–30 min period in KG, KW, and NKW. (<b>a</b>) Changes in δ<sup>13</sup>C for KG. (<b>b</b>) Changes in δ<sup>13</sup>C for KW. (<b>c</b>) Changes in δ<sup>13</sup>C for NKW.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Trends and comparisons of δ<sup>13</sup>C values of soil respiration in KG, KW, and NKW.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparison of weathering ratios of KG to KW and KW to NKW participating carbonates.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 3833 KiB  
Article
Microbial Indicators Show the Rehabilitation Flow of Soil Microbiota After the Brumadinho Dam Collapse
by Paulo Wilson Goulart, Amanda Tristão Santini, Lutecia Rigueira Medina, Alan Emanuel Silva Cerqueira, Alex Castro Gazolla, Wiane Meloni Silva, Igor Rodrigues de Assis, Diego Aniceto, Sergio Oliveira de Paula and Cynthia Canêdo da Silva
Mining 2025, 5(1), 16; https://doi.org/10.3390/mining5010016 - 26 Feb 2025
Viewed by 131
Abstract
Iron ore extraction can lead to significant environmental degradation, particularly due to the generation of tailings during the beneficiation process. This issue was highlighted by the B1 dam collapse in Brumadinho, Brazil, in 2019. Therefore, the study and monitoring of affected areas is [...] Read more.
Iron ore extraction can lead to significant environmental degradation, particularly due to the generation of tailings during the beneficiation process. This issue was highlighted by the B1 dam collapse in Brumadinho, Brazil, in 2019. Therefore, the study and monitoring of affected areas is essential to assess soil quality throughout the rehabilitation process, whether through natural recovery or active rehabilitation practices. Microbial indicators can serve as valuable tools to track the recovery of these areas, given their high sensitivity and rapid response to environmental changes. The aim of this study was to evaluate soil microbial indicators, such as enzyme activity, microbial biomass carbon, microbial basal respiration and microbial diversity, and to select microbial approaches for monitoring the area affected by mining tailings in Brumadinho. The results indicated that the reference area initially outperformed the affected area on all evaluated bioindicators, highlighting environmental stress in the affected zone. Over the course of the study, the two areas began to show greater similarity, suggesting a natural recovery of the soil together with the return of natural vegetation. Indicators such as microbial carbon biomass went from values close to 50 mg of C Kg of soil−1 in the affected area, to around 200, statistically equal to the reference. qCO2 also varied in the affected area to values statistically equal to those of the reference over time, variated in the first collection to 0.25 mg of C-CO2 mg of C−1 h−1 in the affected area against 0.1 in the reference area; in the last collection, both areas presented values close to 0.2. Enzymatic activity had superior values in the reference area about the affected area, being urease, and arylsulfatase more sensitive to show differences between areas over time. The metataxonomic data again revealed indicator species for each environment, including genera such as Bacillus, Mycobacterium, Acidibacter, and Burkholderia representative of the reference, and the genera Ramlibacter, Sinomonas, Psedarthrobacter, and Knoellia indicators of the affected area. By the end of this study, the applicability of microbial indicators for monitoring soil microbiota and its ecosystem services was successfully demonstrated. In addition, specific microbial indicators were proposed for monitoring areas affected by iron mining tailings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Envisioning the Future of Mining, 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Points sampled in the Remanso 1B area, Brumadinho—Brazil, with their respective geographical coordinates.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Microbial basal respiration (MBR), microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and soil qCO<sub>2</sub> in Brumadinho region, Brazil. Different letters represent statistical differences using the Kruskal–Wallis and Fisher test at 5% significance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Comparison of the values obtained for bioindicators MBR (microbial basal respiration), MBC (microbial biomass carbon) and qCO<sub>2</sub> (metabolic quotient). These indicators were evaluated in three collections conducted in the Remanso 1B area of the Brumadinho, Brazil. Different letters indicate statistical differences, as determined by the Kruskal–Wallis and Fisher tests at a 5% significance level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Potential soil enzyme activity, expressed per unit of microbial biomass, for samples collected in Remanso 1B, Brumadinho, Brazil. Different letters represent statistical differences using the Kruskal–Wallis and Fisher test at 5% significance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>PCA based on the correlation of microbiological and physicochemical indicators of the soil studied at three time points (March and September 2022, and March 2023).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Relative abundance of the main phyla observed in the samples collected at Remanso 1B in the Brumadinho, Brazil.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Indicator ASVs at genus level and with above 0.01 from partial sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene from soil samples collected in the Brumadinho, Brazil. The gray bars represent the ASVs present in the two areas.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 3591 KiB  
Article
Effects of Fertilization on Soil Physicochemical Properties and Enzyme Activities of Zanthoxylum planispinum var. Dingtanensis Plantation
by Yurong Fu, Yanghua Yu, Shunsong Yang, Guangguang Yang, Hui Huang, Yun Yang and Mingfeng Du
Forests 2025, 16(3), 418; https://doi.org/10.3390/f16030418 - 25 Feb 2025
Viewed by 202
Abstract
Zanthoxylum planispinum var. Dingtanensis (hereafter Z. planispinum) has excellent characteristics, including Ca and drought tolerance. It can flourish in stony soils, and it is used as a pioneer plant in karst rocky desertification control. However, soil degradation, coupled with the removal of [...] Read more.
Zanthoxylum planispinum var. Dingtanensis (hereafter Z. planispinum) has excellent characteristics, including Ca and drought tolerance. It can flourish in stony soils, and it is used as a pioneer plant in karst rocky desertification control. However, soil degradation, coupled with the removal of nutrients absorbed from the soil by Z. planispinum’s fruit harvesting, exacerbates nutrient deficiency. The effects of fertilization on soil nutrient utilization and microbial limiting factors remain unclear. Here, we established a long-term (3 year) field experiment of no fertilization (CK), organic fertilizer + chemical fertilizer + sprinkler irrigation (T1), chemical fertilizer + sprinkler irrigation (T2), chemical fertilizer treatment (T3), and leguminous (soybean) + chemical fertilizer + sprinkler irrigation (T4). Our findings indicate that fertilization significantly improved the nutrient uptake efficiency of Z. planispinum, and it also enhanced urease activity compared with CK. T1 increased soil respiration and improved water transport, and the soil nutrient content retained in T1 was relatively high. It delayed the mineralization rate of organic matter, promoted nutrient balance, and enhanced enzyme activity related to the carbon and nitrogen cycle. T4 caused soil acidification, reducing the activity of peroxidase (POD) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO). The soil microbial community in the Z. planispinum plantation was limited by carbon and phosphorus, and T1 mitigated this limitation. This study indicated that soil nutrient content regulated enzymatic activity by influencing microbial resource limitation, with organic carbon being the dominant factor. Overall, we recommend T1 as the optimal fertilization strategy for Z. planispinum plantations. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geographical location of the research area and plot.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Differences in POD (<b>a</b>), SUC (<b>b</b>), URE (<b>c</b>), CAS (<b>d</b>), AKP (<b>e</b>), PPO (<b>f</b>), βG (<b>g</b>), and NRA (<b>h</b>) among different fertilization methods. Data are presented as means ± standard deviation (n = 3 replicates). Different lowercase letters represent significant differences at the 0.05 level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Differences in C/N (<b>a</b>), N/P (<b>b</b>), C/P (<b>c</b>), C/Ca (<b>d</b>), P/K (<b>e</b>), Ca/K (<b>f</b>), Ca/P (<b>g</b>), Ca/Si (<b>h</b>), and Fe/Si (<b>i</b>) among different fertilization methods. Soil C/N, N/P, C/P, C/Ca, P/K, Ca/K, Ca/P, Ca/Si, and Fe/Si ratios were expressed as mass ratios. Data are presented as means ± standard deviation (n = 3 replicates). Different lowercase letters represent significant differences at the 0.05 level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Differences in EEA<sub>C:N</sub> (<b>a</b>), EEA<sub>C:P</sub> (<b>b</b>), EEA<sub>N:P</sub> (<b>c</b>), CQI (<b>d</b>), VL (<b>e</b>), and VA (<b>f</b>) among different fertilization methods. Data are presented as means ± standard deviation (n = 3 replicates). Different lowercase letters represent significant differences at the 0.05 level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Correlation analysis between soil enzyme activity and soil physicochemical properties; (<b>b</b>) Correlation analysis between soil enzyme activity and nutrient stoichiometry. *, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; **, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01; ***, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Redundancy analysis (RDA) of soil enzyme activity and soil physicochemical properties affected by long-term fertilization. The blue arrows represent soil physicochemical properties, whereas the red arrows indicate soil enzyme activity.</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 9588 KiB  
Article
Evapotranspiration Partitioning for Croplands Based on Eddy Covariance Measurements and Machine Learning Models
by Jie Zhang, Shanshan Yang, Jingwen Wang, Ruiyun Zeng, Sha Zhang, Yun Bai and Jiahua Zhang
Agronomy 2025, 15(3), 512; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15030512 - 20 Feb 2025
Viewed by 203
Abstract
Accurately partitioning evapotranspiration (ET) of cropland into productive plant transpiration (T) and non-productive soil evaporation (E) is important for improving crop water use efficiency. Many methods, including machine learning methods, have been developed for ET partitioning. However, the applicability of machine learning models [...] Read more.
Accurately partitioning evapotranspiration (ET) of cropland into productive plant transpiration (T) and non-productive soil evaporation (E) is important for improving crop water use efficiency. Many methods, including machine learning methods, have been developed for ET partitioning. However, the applicability of machine learning models in cropland ET partitioning with diverse crop rotations is not clear. In this study, machine learning models are used to predict E, and T is obtained by calculating the difference between ET and E, leading to the derivation of the ratio of transpiration to evapotranspiration (T/ET). We evaluated six machine learning models (i.e., artificial neural networks (ANN), extremely randomized trees (ExtraTrees), gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), random forest (RF), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)) on partitioning ET at 16 cropland flux sites during the period from 2000 to 2020. The evaluation results showed that the XGBoost model had the best performance (R = 0.88, RMSE = 6.87 W/m2, NSE = 0.77, and MAE = 3.41 W/m2) when considering the meteorological data, ecosystem sensible heat flux, ecosystem respiration, soil water content, and remote sensing vegetation indices as input variables. Due to the unavailability of observed E or T data at the 16 cropland sites, we used three other widely used ET partitioning methods to indirectly validate the accuracy of our ET partitioning results based on XGBoost. The results showed that our T estimation results were highly consistent with their T estimation results (R = 0.83–0.91). Moreover, based on the XGBoost model and the three other ET partitioning methods, we estimated the ratio of transpiration to evapotranspiration (T/ET) for different crops. On average, maize had the highest T/ET of 0.619 ± 0.119, followed by soybean (0.618 ± 0.085), winter wheat (0.614 ± 0.08), and sugar beet (0.611 ± 0.065). Lower T/ET was found for paddy rice (0.505 ± 0.055), winter barley (0.590 ± 0.058), potato (0.540 ± 0.088), and rapeseed (0.522 ± 0.107). These results suggest the machine learning models are easy and applicable for cropland T/ET estimation with different crop rotations and reveal obvious differences in water use among different crops, which is crucial for the sustainability of water resources and improvements in cropland water use efficiency. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Machine Learning in Agriculture)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The spatial distribution of the 16 eddy covariance flux sites of cropland used in this study. (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>) are detailed explanations of the two black boxes in (<b>a</b>) above. The base map is the world map from the Köppen–Geiger Climate Classification (<a href="http://www.gloh2o.org/koppen" target="_blank">www.gloh2o.org/koppen</a> (accessed on 10 May 2024)).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) R, (<b>b</b>) RMSE, (<b>c</b>)NSE, and (<b>d</b>) MAE of ANN, ExtraTrees, GBDT, LightGBM, RF, and XGBoost across eight experiments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Performance of ANN, ExtraTrees, GBDT, LightGBM, RF, and XGBoost in the prediction of soil evaporation in the A8 experiment for all cropland sites. The solid black line represents the 1:1 line, and the dashed red line is the fitted line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Performance of the XGBoost model when meteorological features, sensible heat flux, ecosystem respiration, soil water content, and vegetation indices (A8) are input at each site. The solid black line represents the 1:1 line, and the dashed red line is the fitted line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparison of estimated daily T of the X24 method with three other methods: (<b>a</b>) T<sub>X24</sub> compared to T<sub>Z16</sub>, (<b>b</b>) T<sub>X24</sub> compared to T<sub>N18</sub> (<b>c</b>) T<sub>X24</sub> compared to T<sub>Y22</sub>, and (<b>d</b>) T<sub>X24</sub> compared to T<sub>Mean</sub>. The T<sub>Mean</sub> is the mean of the T estimated by the other three methods (Z16, N18, and Y22).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparison of the estimated daily T using the Z16, N18, Y22, and X24 methods at (<b>a</b>) DE-Kli, maize was planted from 23 April to 2 October 2007; (<b>b</b>) DE-Rus, sugar beet was planted from 27 March to 1 October 2014; (<b>c</b>) US-Twt, paddy rice was planted from 2 April to 20 September 2013; and (<b>d</b>) FR-Gri, winter wheat was planted before 15 July 2006, and winter barley was planted after 4 October 2006.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The multi-year mean T/ET for different crops based on four ET partitioning methods (Z16, N18, Y22, and X24). Error bars represent ± 1 standard error.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Scatter plots of predicted and observed soil evaporation using four different depths of SWC: (<b>a</b>) TIME + SWC1, (<b>b</b>) TIME + SWC2, (<b>c</b>) TIME + SWC3, (<b>d</b>) TIME + SWC4, (<b>e</b>) TIME + SWC1 + SWC2, (<b>f</b>) TIME + SWC1 + SWC2 + SWC3, and (<b>g</b>) TIME + SWC1 + SWC2 + SWC3 + SWC4. The solid black line represents the 1:1 line, and the dashed red line is the fitted line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>SHAP values of the model input variables in the prediction of soil evaporation. (<b>a</b>) The mean absolute SHAP value across 16 sites for each input variable, with a dot representing a flux site; (<b>b</b>) the SHAP summary plot of the input variables from all sites, with a dot representing a sample. The SHAP contribution (%) in (<b>a</b>) is calculated as the ratio of the SHAP value of each variable to the sum of all absolute SHAP values.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 2298 KiB  
Article
Effects of Land Use Changes on CO2 Emission Dynamics in the Amazon
by Adriano Maltezo da Rocha, Mauricio Franceschi, Alan Rodrigo Panosso, Marco Antonio Camillo de Carvalho, Mara Regina Moitinho, Marcílio Vieira Martins Filho, Dener Marcio da Silva Oliveira, Diego Antonio França de Freitas, Oscar Mitsuo Yamashita and Newton La Scala
Agronomy 2025, 15(2), 488; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15020488 - 18 Feb 2025
Viewed by 325
Abstract
Global climate change is closely tied to CO2 emissions, and implementing conservation-agricultural systems can help mitigate emissions in the Amazon. By maintaining forest cover and integrating sustainable agricultural practices in pasture, these systems help mitigate climate change and preserve the carbon stocks [...] Read more.
Global climate change is closely tied to CO2 emissions, and implementing conservation-agricultural systems can help mitigate emissions in the Amazon. By maintaining forest cover and integrating sustainable agricultural practices in pasture, these systems help mitigate climate change and preserve the carbon stocks in Amazon forest soils. In addition, these systems improve soil health, microclimate regulation, and promote sustainable agricultural practices in the Amazon region. This study aimed to evaluate the CO2 emission dynamics and its relationship with soil attributes under different uses in the Amazon. The experiment consisted of four treatments (Degraded Pasture—DP; Managed Pasture—MP; Native Forest—NF; and Livestock Forest Integration—LF), with 25 replications. Soil CO2 emission (FCO2), soil temperature, and soil moisture were evaluated over a period of 114 days, and the chemical, physical, and biological attributes of the soil were measured at the end of this period. The mean FCO2 reached values of 4.44, 3.88, 3.80, and 3.14 µmol m−2 s−1 in DP, MP, NF, and LF, respectively. In addition to the direct relationship between soil CO2 emissions and soil temperature for all land uses, soil bulk density indirectly influenced emissions in NF. The amount of humic acid induced the highest emission in DP. Soil organic carbon and carbon stock were higher in MP and LF. These values demonstrate that FCO2 was influenced by the Amazon land uses and highlight LF as a low CO2 emission system with a higher potential for carbon stock in the soil. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Farming Sustainability)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Experimental areas. (<b>A</b>) DP—Degraded Pasture, (<b>B</b>) MP—Managed Pasture, (<b>C</b>) LF—Livestock–Forest Integration, and (<b>D</b>) NF—Native Forest. Paranaíta, MT, Brazil.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Daily means and mean standard error bars of soil CO<sub>2</sub> emission (<b>A</b>), soil moisture (<b>B</b>), and soil temperature (<b>C</b>) in different land uses, Paranaíta, MT, Brazil, 2018 to 2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Linear regression between soil CO<sub>2</sub> emission and soil temperature in different land use typologies.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Biplot graph with soil attributes, management systems, and confidence ellipses (95% confidence). FCO<sub>2</sub>: soil CO<sub>2</sub> emission, Ts: soil temperature, Ms: soil moisture. pH: potential of hydrogen, H + Al: potential acidity, Cstock: soil carbon stock, CEC: cation exchange capacity, Macro: macroporosity, Micro: microporosity, BD: soil bulk density, FA: fulvic acid, HA: humic acid, MBC: soil microbial biomass carbon, BSR: basal soil respiration.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 3893 KiB  
Article
Impact of Microplastics on Forest Soil Properties in Pollution Hotspots in Alluvial Plains of Large Rivers (Morava, Sava, and Danube) of Serbia
by Tara Grujić, Elmira Saljnikov, Dragosav Mutavdžić, Marina Jovković, Slobodan Stefanović, Vladimir Miladinović, Slobodan Krnjajić, Snežana Belanović Simić and Žaklina Marjanović
Forests 2025, 16(2), 363; https://doi.org/10.3390/f16020363 - 17 Feb 2025
Viewed by 462
Abstract
Plastic pollution has become a major environmental problem, while the products of its degradation, microplastics (MPs), appear everywhere on Earth. Data on MPs in agricultural soils have appeared lately, but a significant knowledge gap exists regarding forest soils. In Serbia, municipal waste is [...] Read more.
Plastic pollution has become a major environmental problem, while the products of its degradation, microplastics (MPs), appear everywhere on Earth. Data on MPs in agricultural soils have appeared lately, but a significant knowledge gap exists regarding forest soils. In Serbia, municipal waste is often dumped in forests, creating environmental problems that have not been documented. To explore the impact of waste dumping and MPs on forest fluvisols, we evaluated MPs from topsoils of three waste dumps and adequate visibly plastic non-contaminated forest sites located in alluviums of the largest rivers in Serbia. For assessing the influence of environmental factors on soil MPs, samples were taken in three forest vegetational seasons, in two years. The impact of MPs on soil structure, chemistry, and microbial respiration (MR) was examined. Undisturbed soil columns from uncontaminated sites with added known MP particles were used to estimate the dynamic of MP transfer through the topsoil. Large aggregate formation, soil coarse sand content, specific mass, porosity, and available P, but not MR were affected by contamination. Seasonal and annual environmental changes significantly influenced the behavior of MPs in forest luvisols. MPs effectively penetrated the deeper layers of soil columns within 3 months, with strong accumulation in the 0–10 cm layer. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Influence of Environmental Changes on Forest Soil Quality and Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Sampling locations in the map of Serbia. For the visualization of sampling points, a thematic map was created using QGIS (version 3.34.10), a free and open-source Geographic Information System software, with OpenStreetMap 2.0, license (CC BY-SA 2.0). XYZ Tiles as the basemap. S—Sava sampling site; D—Danube sampling site; M—Morava sampling site.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Rates of microbial respiration in different years/seasons in contaminated and uncontaminated sites. Factorial analysis of variance with a balanced design was used, with Duncan’s test applied for post hoc comparisons (significance level of 5%).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The amounts of MP extracted from contaminated and uncontaminated soil samples in 2022 and 2023, in three forest vegetation seasons (June, August, and November) in selected locations of Morava, Sava, and Danube alluviums.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Visualization of correlations between physical (<b>a</b>) and chemical (<b>b</b>) soil parameters and isolated MP amounts according to the Pearson correlation coefficient. The circle’s size equals the correlation level, while the intensity of blue corresponds to the positive and the intensity of red to the negative correlation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Percentage of total applied MPs that penetrated soil columns measured after 3 months from application. Soil columns were taken at three investigated uncontaminated sites. Applied on each column surface was either 5 g of 1000–3000 μm sized-PVC or 1.5 g of 500–1000 μm-sized PVC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Percentage distribution of isolated MP that penetrated soil columns by depth in three months after the addition of known MP particles. Only deeper layers were presented to reach better visibility—more than 90% of particles that penetrated the soil columns remained in layers 0–10 cm.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop