[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (1,438)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = inertial measurement unit (IMU)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
15 pages, 8996 KiB  
Article
Fast and Deterministic Underwater Point Cloud Registration for Multibeam Echo Sounder Data
by Liang Zhao, Lan Cheng, Tingfeng Tan, Chun Cao and Feihu Zhang
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2025, 13(1), 26; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13010026 (registering DOI) - 28 Dec 2024
Viewed by 69
Abstract
Investigating underwater environments using Multi-Beam Echo Sounder (MBES) point cloud registration technology is a critical yet underdeveloped area in oceanographic research. This paper presents a fast, deterministic Branch-and-Bound (BnB) method with four degrees of freedom, which combines Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) data with [...] Read more.
Investigating underwater environments using Multi-Beam Echo Sounder (MBES) point cloud registration technology is a critical yet underdeveloped area in oceanographic research. This paper presents a fast, deterministic Branch-and-Bound (BnB) method with four degrees of freedom, which combines Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) data with MBES point cloud data for precise registration. Given the prevalence of outliers and noise in underwater acoustic measurements, the BnB method is employed to provide globally deterministic solutions. However, due to the exponential convergence speed of the BnB method with respect to the dimensionality of the solution space, searching within a six-degree-of-freedom parameter space (three rotational and three translational degrees of freedom) can be extremely time-consuming. To this end, the Z-axis of the point cloud is aligned with the gravitational direction of the IMU, reducing the rotational degrees of freedom from three to one, specifically concerning yaw. Additionally, an outlier exclusion strategy is introduced to eliminate mismatches, significantly reducing the number of key-point correspondences and thereby improving registration efficiency. Experiments conducted on both public and real-world lake datasets demonstrate that the proposed method achieves a favorable balance between speed and accuracy, outperforming other tested methods and meeting the demands of contemporary research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Oceanography)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The overall algorithmic framework is as follows: Initially, point clouds are preprocessed, including downsampling, extracting Invariant Shape Signature (ISS) key points, and obtaining matching relations using the Fast Point Feature Histograms (FPFH) descriptor. Subsequently, the Fast Marching Pruning (FMP) algorithm is applied to eliminate mismatches within the correspondences. Finally, by aligning the gravity direction of the point cloud with the Z-axis direction, the three degrees of freedom for rotation are reduced to one, and the transformation matrix is computed using the BnB algorithm with four degrees of freedom.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Subfigures (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>,<b>e</b>) represent rotational errors, while subfigures (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>,<b>f</b>) denote translational errors. From top to bottom, they correspond to errors under three types of noise conditions: clean, crop, and jitter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Runtime comparison of different methods across different hardware devices. Figure (<b>a</b>) is run on a device equipped with an Intel Core i5-10400F CPU and 8 GB of RAM, while Figure (<b>b</b>) is run on a device with an Intel Core i5-13500H CPU and 16 GB of RAM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Figure (<b>a</b>) presents the experimental site, a lake encompassing an area of over 10,000 hectares with a maximum depth of 20 m, characterized by a diverse underwater topography. Figure (<b>b</b>) displays the constructed experimental platform, which primarily comprises a multibeam sonar and a suite of inertial navigation systems. The inertial navigation system was utilized to furnish IMU and GPS data, facilitating the construction of the point cloud.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The corresponding relationships within set <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi mathvariant="script">C</mi> </semantics></math> were contrasted before and after the application of FMP to eliminate mismatches. To better showcase these correspondences, the centroids of two point clouds were moved to the origin, and sparse feature points were utilized.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Subfigures (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) represent the registration results of each method on the p1, p2, and p3 matching pairs respectively. In these images, red indicates the source point set, while green represents the target point set.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6 Cont.
<p>Subfigures (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) represent the registration results of each method on the p1, p2, and p3 matching pairs respectively. In these images, red indicates the source point set, while green represents the target point set.</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 848 KiB  
Study Protocol
Do PROMs or Sensor-Based Monitoring Detect Improvements in Patients’ Knee Function After Total-Knee Arthroplasty?—A Study Protocol for a Prospective Controlled Study
by Lotanna Mba, Robert Prill, Jonathan Lettner, Nikolai Ramadanov, Robert Krause, Jan Reichmann and Roland Becker
Sensors 2025, 25(1), 118; https://doi.org/10.3390/s25010118 (registering DOI) - 27 Dec 2024
Viewed by 240
Abstract
Determining whether preoperative performance-based knee function predicts postoperative performance-based knee function and whether patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) completed by participants can detect these changes could significantly enhance the planning of postoperative rehabilitation for patients following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aims to [...] Read more.
Determining whether preoperative performance-based knee function predicts postoperative performance-based knee function and whether patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) completed by participants can detect these changes could significantly enhance the planning of postoperative rehabilitation for patients following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aims to collect data on performance-based knee function using inertial measurement units (IMUs) worn by participants both preoperatively and postoperatively. PROMs will be completed by the patients before and after surgery to assess their ability to detect the same changes in performance-based knee function measured by the sensors. Additionally, the study will investigate the correlation between the degree of knee alignment correction and postoperative performance-based knee function in participants after TKA. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue IMU and Innovative Sensors for Healthcare)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Sensors attached to a preoperative patient’ knee.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Pre- and postoperative long leg X-ray imaging with mechanical knee axis measurements.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 2803 KiB  
Article
Accuracy of Automatically Identifying the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists Threshold Limit Values Twelve Lifting Zones over Three Simplified Zones Using Computer Algorithm
by Menekse S. Barim, Ming-Lun Lu, Shuo Feng, Marie A. Hayden and Dwight Werren
Sensors 2025, 25(1), 111; https://doi.org/10.3390/s25010111 (registering DOI) - 27 Dec 2024
Viewed by 184
Abstract
The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) Threshold Limit Values (TLVs) for lifting provides risk zones for assessing two-handed lifting tasks. This paper describes two computational models for identifying the lifting risk zones using gyroscope information from five inertial measurement units (IMUs) [...] Read more.
The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) Threshold Limit Values (TLVs) for lifting provides risk zones for assessing two-handed lifting tasks. This paper describes two computational models for identifying the lifting risk zones using gyroscope information from five inertial measurement units (IMUs) attached to the lifter. Two models were developed: (1) the ratio model using body segment length ratios of the forearm, upper arm, trunk, thigh, and calf segments, and (2) the ratio + length model using actual measurements of the body segments in the ratio model. The models were evaluated using data from 360 lifting trials performed by 10 subjects (5 males and 5 females) with an average age of 51.50 (±9.83) years. The accuracy of the two models was compared against data collected by a laboratory-based motion capture system as a function of 12 ACGIH lifting risk zones and 3 grouped risk zones (low, medium, and high). Results showed that only the ratio + length model provides acceptable estimates of lifting risk with an average of 69% accuracy level for predicting one of the 3 grouped zones and a higher rate of 92% for predicting the high lifting zone. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sensor Technologies in Sports and Exercise)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Methodology flowchart.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Initial lifting positions based on the ACGIH TLV for lifting (H1: near horizontal distance from the object being lifted (wired grid), H2: middle distance, H3: far distance, V1: shoulder height, V2: elbow height, V3: knee height, and V4: above ankle height) (yellow indicates low-risk zones (4 and 5), green represents medium-risk zones (5, 7, 8, and 9), while orange signifies high-risk zones (1, 2, 3, 10, 11, and 12)).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Placement of the IMU sensors and marker clusters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Body length ratio model and angular data of four sensors used for estimating V and H.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Ratio model heatmap showing correlations between lifting zones identified by computer models using data from inertial measurement units vs. a laboratory-based motion capture system. A value of 0 indicates no correlation, while a value of 3 signifies 100% correlation for that specific zone over all 3 trials for a given subject.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Ratio + length model heatmap showing correlations between lifting zones identified by computer models using data from inertial measurement units vs. a laboratory-based motion capture system. A value of 0 indicates no correlation, while a value of 3 signifies 100% correlation for that specific zone over all 3 trials for a given subject.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Scatter plot of the ratio model dots represents lifting zones identified by the computer model using data from inertial measurement units, and the grid represents lifting zones identified through a laboratory-based motion capture system. Matching colors between dots and zone labels represents the correlation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Scatter plot of the ratio + length model dots represents lifting zones identified by the computer model using data from inertial measurement units, and the grid represents lifting zones identified through a laboratory-based motion capture system. Matching colors between dots and zone labels represents the correlation.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 17676 KiB  
Article
Comparative Assessment of the Effect of Positioning Techniques and Ground Control Point Distribution Models on the Accuracy of UAV-Based Photogrammetric Production
by Muhammed Enes Atik and Mehmet Arkali
Drones 2025, 9(1), 15; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones9010015 - 27 Dec 2024
Viewed by 330
Abstract
Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) systems have recently become essential for mapping, surveying, and three-dimensional (3D) modeling applications. These systems are capable of providing highly accurate products through integrated advanced technologies, including a digital camera, inertial measurement unit (IMU), and Global Navigation Satellite System [...] Read more.
Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) systems have recently become essential for mapping, surveying, and three-dimensional (3D) modeling applications. These systems are capable of providing highly accurate products through integrated advanced technologies, including a digital camera, inertial measurement unit (IMU), and Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS). UAVs are a cost-effective alternative to traditional aerial photogrammetry, and recent advancements demonstrate their effectiveness in many applications. In UAV-based photogrammetry, ground control points (GCPs) are utilized for georeferencing to enhance positioning precision. The distribution, number, and location of GCPs in the study area play a crucial role in determining the accuracy of photogrammetric products. This research evaluates the accuracy of positioning techniques for image acquisition for photogrammetric production and the effect of GCP distribution models. The camera position was determined using real-time kinematic (RTK), post-processed kinematic (PPK), and precise point positioning-ambiguity resolution (PPP-AR) techniques. In the criteria for determining the GCPs, six models were established within the İstanbul Technical University, Ayazaga Campus. To assess the accuracy of the points in these models, the horizontal, vertical, and 3D root mean square error (RMSE) values were calculated, holding the test points stationary in place. In the study, 2.5 cm horizontal RMSE and 3.0 cm vertical RMSE were obtained with the model containing five homogeneous GCPs by the indirect georeferencing method. The highest RMSE values of all three components in RTK, PPK, and PPP-AR methods were obtained without GCPs. For all six models, all techniques have an error value of sub-decimeter. The PPP-AR technique yields error values that are comparable to those of the other techniques. The PPP-AR appears to be an alternative to RTK and PPK, which usually require infrastructure, labor, and higher costs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The basis of globally operating PPP.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The fundamental concept of RTK GNSS positioning through the use of a UAV.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The study area is located on the Ayazaga Campus of Istanbul Technical University, Türkiye.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Distribution of test points (on <b>left</b>) in the study area and GCP sample (on <b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>GCP distribution models generated in the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>All stations of network ISKI-UKBS [<a href="#B55-drones-09-00015" class="html-bibr">55</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Workflow for post-processed positioning techniques.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>PALA station (on <b>left</b>) and distance (on <b>right</b>) from the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Orthomosaic (on <b>left</b>) and DEM (on <b>right</b>) produced as a result of photogrammetric evaluation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Box plot for horizontal and vertical differences in CPs. Red dots refer to outliers.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The errors in the X-axis were evaluated for each positioning technique.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The errors in the Y-axis were evaluated for each positioning technique.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>The errors in the Z-axis were evaluated for each positioning technique.</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 2050 KiB  
Systematic Review
Validity of Wearable Inertial Sensors for Gait Analysis: A Systematic Review
by Giuseppe Prisco, Maria Agnese Pirozzi, Antonella Santone, Fabrizio Esposito, Mario Cesarelli, Francesco Amato and Leandro Donisi
Diagnostics 2025, 15(1), 36; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15010036 - 27 Dec 2024
Viewed by 191
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Gait analysis, traditionally performed with lab-based optical motion capture systems, offers high accuracy but is costly and impractical for real-world use. Wearable technologies, especially inertial measurement units (IMUs), enable portable and accessible assessments outside the lab, though challenges with sensor placement, [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Gait analysis, traditionally performed with lab-based optical motion capture systems, offers high accuracy but is costly and impractical for real-world use. Wearable technologies, especially inertial measurement units (IMUs), enable portable and accessible assessments outside the lab, though challenges with sensor placement, signal selection, and algorithm design can affect accuracy. This systematic review aims to bridge the benchmarking gap between IMU-based and traditional systems, validating the use of wearable inertial systems for gait analysis. Methods: This review examined English studies between 2012 and 2023, retrieved from the Scopus database, comparing wearable sensors to optical motion capture systems, focusing on IMU body placement, gait parameters, and validation metrics. Exclusion criteria for the search included conference papers, reviews, unavailable papers, studies without wearable inertial sensors for gait analysis, and those not involving agreement studies or optical motion capture systems. Results: From an initial pool of 479 articles, 32 were selected for full-text screening. Among them, the lower body resulted in the most common site for single IMU placement (in 22 studies), while the most frequently used multi-sensor configuration involved IMU positioning on the lower back, shanks, feet, and thighs (10 studies). Regarding gait parameters, 11 studies out of the 32 included studies focused on spatial-temporal parameters, 12 on joint kinematics, 2 on gait events, and the remainder on a combination of parameters. In terms of validation metrics, 24 studies employed correlation coefficients as the primary measure, while 7 studies used a combination of error metrics, correlation coefficients, and Bland–Altman analysis. Validation metrics revealed that IMUs exhibited good to moderate agreement with optical motion capture systems for kinematic measures. In contrast, spatiotemporal parameters demonstrated greater variability, with agreement ranging from moderate to poor. Conclusions: This review highlighted the transformative potential of wearable IMUs in advancing gait analysis beyond the constraints of traditional laboratory-based systems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wearable Sensors for Health Monitoring and Diagnostics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Gait phases in a single gait cycle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Summary review workflow.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Distribution of papers over time.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Distribution of wearable sensors: prototypes and commercial wearable inertial systems.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The number of studies that positioned IMUs on specific anatomical locations. The “Single Placement” column represents studies where sensors were located at only one anatomical site. The “Placement Combinations” columns represent studies where sensors were positioned at multiple anatomical locations. Each relevant location is marked with an “x”, and the number of studies utilizing that specific combination is noted at the bottom of each column. The “Total” reflects the cumulative number of studies that placed sensors at the respective anatomical location.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Distribution of gait parameters: spatiotemporal, joint kinematic angles, and gait events.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Employed statistical tool distributions.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 787 KiB  
Article
Instrumenting Parkrun: Usefulness and Validity of Inertial Sensors
by Rachel Mason, Yunus Celik, Gill Barry, Alan Godfrey and Samuel Stuart
Sensors 2025, 25(1), 30; https://doi.org/10.3390/s25010030 - 24 Dec 2024
Viewed by 194
Abstract
The analysis of running gait has conventionally taken place within an expensive and restricted laboratory space, with wearable technology offering a practical, cost-effective, and unobtrusive way to examine running gait in more natural environments. This pilot study presents a wearable inertial measurement unit [...] Read more.
The analysis of running gait has conventionally taken place within an expensive and restricted laboratory space, with wearable technology offering a practical, cost-effective, and unobtrusive way to examine running gait in more natural environments. This pilot study presents a wearable inertial measurement unit (IMU) setup for the continuous analysis of running gait during an outdoor parkrun (i.e., 5 km). The study aimed to (1) provide analytical validation of running gait measures compared to time- and age-graded performance and (2) explore performance validation. Ten healthy adults (7 females, 3 males, mean age 37.2 ± 11.7 years) participated. The participants wore Axivity AX6 IMUs on the talus joint of each foot, recording tri-axial accelerometer and gyroscope data at 200 Hz. Temporal gait characteristics—gait cycle, ground contact time, swing time, and duty factor—were extracted using zero-crossing algorithms. The data were analyzed for correlations between the running performance, foot strike type, and fatigue-induced changes in temporal gait characteristics. Strong correlations were found between the performance time and both the gait cycle and ground contact time, with weak correlations for foot strike types. The analysis of asymmetry and fatigue highlighted modest changes in gait as fatigue increased, but no significant gender differences were found. This setup demonstrates potential for in-field gait analysis for running, providing insights for performance and injury prevention strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inertial Sensing System for Motion Monitoring)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Time series analyses of running gait characteristics over the 5 km run (%). (<b>A</b>) Gait cycle, (<b>B</b>) ground contact time, (<b>C</b>) swing time, (<b>D</b>) duty factor. Each panel includes the mean (solid black line), standard deviation (shaded gray area), and elevation profile (dashed green line).</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 9657 KiB  
Article
Research on Digital Terrain Construction Based on IMU and LiDAR Fusion Perception
by Chen Huang, Yiqi Wang, Xiaoqiang Sun and Shiyue Yang
Sensors 2025, 25(1), 15; https://doi.org/10.3390/s25010015 - 24 Dec 2024
Viewed by 176
Abstract
To address the shortcomings of light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensors in extracting road surface elevation information in front of a vehicle, a scheme for digital terrain construction based on the fusion of an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) and LiDAR perception is proposed. [...] Read more.
To address the shortcomings of light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensors in extracting road surface elevation information in front of a vehicle, a scheme for digital terrain construction based on the fusion of an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) and LiDAR perception is proposed. First, two sets of sensor coordinate systems were configured, and the parameters of LiDAR and IMU were calibrated. Then, a terrain construction system based on the fusion perception of IMU and LiDAR was established, and improvements were made to the state estimation and mapping architecture. Terrain construction experiments were conducted in an academic setting. Finally, based on the output information from the terrain construction system, a moving average-like algorithm was designed to process point cloud data and extract the road surface elevation information at the vehicle’s trajectory position. By comparing the extraction effects of four different sliding window widths, the 4 cm width sliding window, which yielded the best results, was ultimately selected, making the extracted road surface elevation information more accurate and effective. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Radar Sensors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>LiDAR coordinate system and IMU coordinate system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>LiDAR and IMU calibration diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Overall architecture of state estimation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Road segment with speed bump on campus.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Point cloud map of road segment with speed bump.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Point cloud map of road segment with speed bump generated using improved architecture.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Uneven road surface used for the formal experiment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Point cloud map generated using the original architecture.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Improved architecture-generated point cloud maps.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Effect of the Passthrough algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Flowchart of the Passthrough algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Top view of point cloud data for the front tire trajectory position.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Road surface elevation information generated using moving average-like algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Road surface elevation information generated using Gaussian filter algorithm.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 4877 KiB  
Article
Systematic Evaluation of IMU Sensors for Application in Smart Glove System for Remote Monitoring of Hand Differences
by Amy Harrison, Andrea Jester, Surej Mouli, Antonio Fratini and Ali Jabran
Sensors 2025, 25(1), 2; https://doi.org/10.3390/s25010002 - 24 Dec 2024
Viewed by 266
Abstract
Human hands have over 20 degrees of freedom, enabled by a complex system of bones, muscles, and joints. Hand differences can significantly impair dexterity and independence in daily activities. Accurate assessment of hand function, particularly digit movement, is vital for effective intervention and [...] Read more.
Human hands have over 20 degrees of freedom, enabled by a complex system of bones, muscles, and joints. Hand differences can significantly impair dexterity and independence in daily activities. Accurate assessment of hand function, particularly digit movement, is vital for effective intervention and rehabilitation. However, current clinical methods rely on subjective observations and limited tests. Smart gloves with inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors have emerged as tools for capturing digit movements, yet their sensor accuracy remains underexplored. This study developed and validated an IMU-based smart glove system for measuring finger joint movements in individuals with hand differences. The glove measured 3D digit rotations and was evaluated against an industrial robotic arm. Tests included rotations around three axes at 1°, 10°, and 90°, simulating extension/flexion, supination/pronation, and abduction/adduction. The IMU sensors demonstrated high accuracy and reliability, with minimal systematic bias and strong positive correlations (p > 0.95 across all tests). Agreement matrices revealed high agreement (<1°) in 24 trials, moderate (1–10°) in 12 trials, and low (>10°) in only 4 trials. The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) ranged from 1.357 to 5.262 for the 90° tests, 0.094 to 0.538 for the 10° tests, and 0.129 to 0.36 for the 1° tests. Likewise, mean absolute error (MAE) ranged from 0.967 to 4.679 for the 90° tests, 0.073 to 0.386 for the 10° tests, and 0.102 to 0.309 for the 1° tests. The sensor provided precise measurements of digit angles across 0–90° in multiple directions, enabling reliable clinical assessment, remote monitoring, and improved diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation for individuals with hand differences. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>System architecture showing the data acquisition pathway.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Overview of the glove system, showing key components: PCB, IMUs, microcontroller, and multiplexer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Software system architecture and data flow.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Flowchart showing the processes of the glove system’s firmware.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Experimental setup for validation of the IMU using the UR5e robotic arm, allowing rotation of sensor B in the x, y, and z axes shown.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Robotic arm poses at rest (<b>a</b>) and at 90° rotation around <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis (<b>b</b>), <span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis (<b>c</b>), and <span class="html-italic">z</span>-axis (<b>d</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Angle vs. Time plots measured from the IMU sensors (red) and robotic arms (blue), for all twelve trials of the 90° (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>), 10° (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>), and 1° (<b>g</b>–<b>i</b>) <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis rotation, <span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis rotation, and <span class="html-italic">z</span>-axis rotation tests.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Correlation heatmaps for all twelve trials of the (<b>a</b>) 90° <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis and (<b>b</b>) 90° <span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis rotation tests.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 6270 KiB  
Article
Initial Pose Estimation Method for Robust LiDAR-Inertial Calibration and Mapping
by Eun-Seok Park , Saba Arshad and Tae-Hyoung Park
Sensors 2024, 24(24), 8199; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24248199 - 22 Dec 2024
Viewed by 334
Abstract
Handheld LiDAR scanners, which typically consist of a LiDAR sensor, Inertial Measurement Unit, and processor, enable data capture while moving, offering flexibility for various applications, including indoor and outdoor 3D mapping in fields such as architecture and civil engineering. Unlike fixed LiDAR systems, [...] Read more.
Handheld LiDAR scanners, which typically consist of a LiDAR sensor, Inertial Measurement Unit, and processor, enable data capture while moving, offering flexibility for various applications, including indoor and outdoor 3D mapping in fields such as architecture and civil engineering. Unlike fixed LiDAR systems, handheld devices allow data collection from different angles, but this mobility introduces challenges in data quality, particularly when initial calibration between sensors is not precise. Accurate LiDAR-IMU calibration, essential for mapping accuracy in Simultaneous Localization and Mapping applications, involves precise alignment of the sensors’ extrinsic parameters. This research presents a robust initial pose calibration method for LiDAR-IMU systems in handheld devices, specifically designed for indoor environments. The research contributions are twofold. Firstly, we present a robust plane detection method for LiDAR data. This plane detection method removes the noise caused by mobility of scanning device and provides accurate planes for precise LiDAR initial pose estimation. Secondly, we present a robust planes-aided LiDAR calibration method that estimates the initial pose. By employing this LiDAR calibration method, an efficient LiDAR-IMU calibration is achieved for accurate mapping. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method achieves lower calibration errors and improved computational efficiency compared to existing methods. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Sensors and Robotics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>LiDAR based mapping using (<b>a</b>) LiDAR-IMU calibration method: Error-free mapping, and (<b>b</b>) Without LiDAR-IMU calibration method: Mapping error due to drift, highlighted in yellow circle. The colors in each map represents the intensity of LiDAR point cloud.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Overall framework of the proposed initial pose estimation method for robust LiDAR-IMU calibration. Different colors in voxelization shows the intensity of LiDAR points in each voxel. The extracted planes are represented with yellow and green color while red color points indicate noise.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Robust plane detection method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Robust plane extraction through refinement. (<b>a</b>) Voxels containing edges and noise have low plane scores due to large distances and high variance represented as red color normal vector while those with high plane scores are represented with blue. (<b>b</b>) The refinement process enables the effective separation and removal of areas containing edges and noise.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>LiDAR calibration method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>IMU downsampling.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Qualitative Comparison of the proposed method with the benchmark plane detection algorithms.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Top view of LiDAR data. (<b>a</b>) LiDAR raw data before calibration. (<b>b</b>) LiDAR data after calibration using the proposed method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Performance comparison in terms of (<b>a</b>) roll and (<b>b</b>) pitch errors in the VECtor dataset.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Performance comparison in terms of the (<b>a</b>) mapping result using LI-init and (<b>b</b>) mapping result using LI-init+Proposed.</p>
Full article ">
10 pages, 2003 KiB  
Article
The Measurement of Spatiotemporal Parameters in Running at Different Velocities: A Comparison Between a GPS Unit and an Infrared Mat
by Thomas Provot, Benjamin Millot, Eline Hazotte, Thomas Rousseau and Jean Slawinski
Methods Protoc. 2024, 7(6), 103; https://doi.org/10.3390/mps7060103 - 20 Dec 2024
Viewed by 311
Abstract
The accurate measurement of spatiotemporal parameters, such as step length and step frequency, is crucial for analyzing running and sprinting performance. Traditional methods like video analysis and force platforms are either time consuming or limited in scope, prompting the need for more efficient [...] Read more.
The accurate measurement of spatiotemporal parameters, such as step length and step frequency, is crucial for analyzing running and sprinting performance. Traditional methods like video analysis and force platforms are either time consuming or limited in scope, prompting the need for more efficient technologies. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a commercial Global Positioning System (GPS) unit integrated with an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) in capturing these parameters during sprints at varying velocities. Five experienced male runners performed six 40 m sprints at three velocity conditions (S: Slow, M: Medium, F: Fast) while equipped with a GPS-IMU system and an optical system as the gold standard reference. A total of 398 steps were analyzed for this study. Step frequency, step length and step velocity were extracted and compared using statistical methods, including the coefficient of determination (r2) and root mean square error (RMSE). Results indicated a very large agreement between the embedded system and the reference system, for the step frequency (r2 = 0.92, RMSE = 0.14 Hz), for the step length (r2 = 0.91, RMSE = 0.07 m) and the step velocity (r2 = 0.99, RMSE = 0.17 m/s). The GPS-IMU system accurately measured spatiotemporal parameters across different running velocities, demonstrating low relative errors and high precision. This study demonstrates that GPS-IMU systems can provide comprehensive spatiotemporal data, making them valuable for both training and competition. The integration of these technologies offers practical benefits, helping coaches better understand and enhance running performance. Future improvements in sample rate acquisition GPS-IMU technology could further increase measurement accuracy and expand its application in elite sports. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Methods on Sport Biomechanics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Step extraction on vertical acceleration signals. The time index of each step was deduced from the acceleration signals and used to recalculate the various indicators.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Comparison of the step frequency established between the reference system and the embedded system: correlation graph (<b>left</b>) and Bland and Altman graph (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Comparison of the step length established between the reference system and the embedded system: correlation graph (<b>left</b>) and Bland and Altman graph (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Comparison of the step velocity established between the reference system and the embedded system: correlation graph (<b>left</b>) and Bland and Altman graph (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Evolution of the step frequency (<b>top</b>) and the step length (<b>bottom</b>) as a function of the velocity. The orange crosses represent the reference system, while the blue dots represent the embedded system.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 6119 KiB  
Article
A Laser-Based SLAM Algorithm of the Unmanned Surface Vehicle for Accurate Localization and Mapping in an Inland Waterway Scenario
by Yang Wang, Chao Liu, Jiahe Liu, Jinzhe Wang, Jianbin Liu, Kai Zheng and Rencheng Zheng
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12(12), 2311; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12122311 - 16 Dec 2024
Viewed by 436
Abstract
It is important to improve the localization accuracy of the unmanned surface vehicle (USV) for ensuring safe navigation in an inland waterway scenario. However, the localization accuracy of the USV is affected by the limited availability of global navigation satellite system signals, the [...] Read more.
It is important to improve the localization accuracy of the unmanned surface vehicle (USV) for ensuring safe navigation in an inland waterway scenario. However, the localization accuracy of the USV is affected by the limited availability of global navigation satellite system signals, the sparsity of feature points, and the high scene similarity in inland waterway scenarios. Therefore, this paper proposes a laser-based simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) algorithm for accurate localization and mapping in inland waterway scenarios. Inertial measurement unit (IMU) data are integrated with lidar data to address motion distortion caused by the frequent motion of the USV. Subsequently, a generalized iterative closest point (GICP) algorithm incorporating rejection sampling is integrated to enhance the accuracy of point cloud matching, involving a two-phase filtering process to select key feature points for matching. Additionally, a mixed global descriptor is constructed by combining point cloud intensity and distance information to improve the accuracy of loop closure detection. Experiments are conducted on the USV-Inland datasets to evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithm. The experimental results show that the proposed algorithm generates accurate mapping and significantly improves localization accuracy by 25.6%, 18.5%, and 23.6% compared to A-LOAM, LeGO-LOAM, and ISC-LOAM, respectively. These results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm achieves accurate localization and mapping in an inland waterway scenario. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Ocean Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Overview of proposed SLAM system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Point cloud matching procedure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Experimental scenarios of USV-Inland datasets. (<b>a</b>) Longest driving scenario and (<b>b</b>) round-trip driving scenario.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Effects of mapping in top view direction. (<b>a</b>) A-LAOM, (<b>b</b>) LeGO-LOAM, (<b>c</b>) ISC-LOAM, and (<b>d</b>) RS-SLAM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Effects of mapping in side view direction. (<b>a</b>) A-LAOM, (<b>b</b>) LeGO-LOAM, (<b>c</b>) ISC-LOAM, and (<b>d</b>) RS-SLAM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Effects of mapping in top view direction. (<b>a</b>) A-LAOM, (<b>b</b>) LeGO-LOAM, (<b>c</b>) ISC-LOAM, and (<b>d</b>) RS-SLAM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Effects of mapping in side view direction. (<b>a</b>) A-LAOM, (<b>b</b>) LeGO-LOAM, (<b>c</b>) ISC-LOAM, and (<b>d</b>) RS-SLAM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Trajectory of straight driving scenario.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Trajectory of corner driving scenario.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Motion trajectory of round-trip driving scenario.</p>
Full article ">
8 pages, 831 KiB  
Article
Subjective and Objective Assessment of the Preferred Rotational Cervical Spine Position in Infants with an Upper Cervical Spine Dysfunction: A Cross-Sectional Study
by Anke Langenfeld, Inga Paravicini, Mette Hobaek Siegenthaler, Martina Wehrli, Melanie Häusler, Torsten Bergander and Petra Schweinhardt
Children 2024, 11(12), 1515; https://doi.org/10.3390/children11121515 - 13 Dec 2024
Viewed by 460
Abstract
Background: We aimed to assess (1) the awareness of parents regarding the cervical rotation preference of their infant and the agreement of the parent, clinician and objective assessments, and (2) the test–retest reliability for objective (measured) rotation, lateral flexion and combined flexion–rotation. Methods: [...] Read more.
Background: We aimed to assess (1) the awareness of parents regarding the cervical rotation preference of their infant and the agreement of the parent, clinician and objective assessments, and (2) the test–retest reliability for objective (measured) rotation, lateral flexion and combined flexion–rotation. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study including 69 infants aged three to six months with upper cervical spine dysfunction, without general health issues or specific cervical spine impairments. No treatment was applied. The primary outcomes were parent and clinician assessments of cervical spine rotation preference. The secondary outcome was the cervical range of motion measured by inertial measurement units (IMUs) at two different timepoints. Spearman correlation was performed for the parent, clinician and objective assessments. IMU data were dichotomized into the preferred and unpreferred sides, and test–retest reliability was assessed (ICC). Results: The mean age of infants was 145 days ± 29.1 days, birth length 49.40 cm ± 2.7 cm, birth weight 3328 g ± 530.9 g and 24 were female. In total, 33 infants were assessed by their parents as right-preferred, 30 as left-preferred and 6 as having no preference. The clinician assessed 38 infants as right-preferred and 31 as left-preferred. The correlation between parents and the clinician was rs = 0.687 (p < 0.001), the clinician and the IMU rs = 0.408 (p = 0.005) and parents and the IMU rs = 0.301 (p = 0.044). The ICC of cervical range of motion measurements ranged from poor to moderate. Conclusions: Clinicians can use the parents’ assessment of cervical spine rotation preference as a foundation for their clinical examination. IMU measurements are difficult in infants, possibly due to their lack of cooperation during measurements. Clinical Trial Registration Number: clinicaltrails.gov (NCT04981782). Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pediatric Orthopedics & Sports Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Positioning of the inertial measurement units on the child, positioning of the child and positioning of the parent’s hands on the child during measurement.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Curves for flexion–rotation test left (L.FRT) and right (R.FRT), lateral flexion test left (L.LAT) and right (R.LAT) and rotation test left (L.ROT) right (R.ROT). For flexion–rotation test, the blue curve represents the flexion of the cervical spine, the yellow curve rotation and the blue straight line the threshold of flexion needed to qualify flexion–rotation as valid. The green dots signify good measurements without flaws. The gray line resembles lateral flexion and the yellow line rotation. The purple line is the combined representation of flexion and rotation, and the point in time with maximum combined (flex/rot) rotation is marked with a purple dot. This point in time is used to obtain rotation degrees (yellow line point). On the yellow line, it is marked as “green” (good) when the flexion degree at this point in time is above the threshold, and otherwise red.</p>
Full article ">
10 pages, 1555 KiB  
Article
Impact of Physiotherapy on Shoulder Kinematics in Swimmers with Swimmer’s Shoulder Pain
by Alessandra Raffini, Miriam Martini, Laura Mazzari, Alex Buoite Stella, Manuela Deodato, Luigi Murena and Agostino Accardo
Sensors 2024, 24(24), 7936; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24247936 - 12 Dec 2024
Viewed by 387
Abstract
Swimmer’s shoulder is a common condition among elite swimmers, often leading to pain and reduced performance. Fatigue can exacerbate this condition by affecting shoulder strength, proprioception, and range of motion, potentially increasing the risk of overuse injuries. This preliminary study aimed to evaluate [...] Read more.
Swimmer’s shoulder is a common condition among elite swimmers, often leading to pain and reduced performance. Fatigue can exacerbate this condition by affecting shoulder strength, proprioception, and range of motion, potentially increasing the risk of overuse injuries. This preliminary study aimed to evaluate the impact of physiotherapy treatment and the effects of fatigue on shoulder kinematics using inertial and magnetic measurement units (IMUs). Five male swimmers (aged 21–27) with at least 3 years of training and suffering from swimmer’s shoulder pain participated in the study. The protocol included three sessions: dry front crawl exercises using one arm in the first and third sessions, and a fatiguing swimming exercise in the second. IMUs were used to capture 3D rotation angles, focusing on flexion/extension, abduction/adduction, and internal/external rotations during the first and third sessions. Stroke amplitude was analyzed before and after the physiotherapy treatment and fatiguing exercise. The results showed a significant increase in internal/external rotation amplitude post-fatigue before physiotherapy (p = 0.03), with a non-significant decrease in flexion/extension after treatment, suggesting improved shoulder stabilization. Despite these preliminary findings being based on a reduced number of participants, they indicate that physiotherapy may enhance shoulder motion control in swimmers with shoulder pain. Nevertheless, further studies with larger cohorts are needed to confirm these results. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic diagram representing the phases of the protocol implemented in the study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Mean amplitude trend of internal/external rotation, flexion/extension, and adduction/abduction before physiotherapy treatment (black) and pathological subjects after physiotherapy treatment (red), before (solid line), and after (dashed line) fatiguing protocol.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Box plots of the amplitude values for each angular rotation and condition (before and after the physiotherapy treatment and before and after the fatiguing protocol). The median values are in red with the box delimiting the 25° and 75° percentiles, and the red point indicates one outlier value.</p>
Full article ">
35 pages, 13196 KiB  
Review
Enhancing Intelligent Shoes with Gait Analysis: A Review on the Spatiotemporal Estimation Techniques
by Anna M. Joseph, Azadeh Kian and Rezaul Begg
Sensors 2024, 24(24), 7880; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24247880 - 10 Dec 2024
Viewed by 480
Abstract
The continuous, automated monitoring of sensor-based data for walking capacity and mobility has expanded gait analysis applications beyond controlled laboratory settings to real-world, everyday environments facilitated by the development of portable, cost-efficient wearable sensors. In particular, the integration of Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) [...] Read more.
The continuous, automated monitoring of sensor-based data for walking capacity and mobility has expanded gait analysis applications beyond controlled laboratory settings to real-world, everyday environments facilitated by the development of portable, cost-efficient wearable sensors. In particular, the integration of Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) into smart shoes has proven effective for capturing detailed foot movements and spatiotemporal gait characteristics. While IMUs enable accurate foot trajectory estimation through the double integration of acceleration data, challenges such as drift errors necessitate robust correction techniques to ensure reliable performance. This review analyzes current literature on shoe-based systems utilizing IMUs to estimate spatiotemporal gait parameters and foot trajectory characteristics, including foot–ground clearance. We explore the challenges and advancements in achieving accurate 3D foot trajectory estimation using IMUs in smart shoes and the application of advanced techniques like zero-velocity updates and error correction methods. These developments present significant opportunities for achieving reliable and efficient real-time gait assessment in everyday environments. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Illustration of different gait events during a gait cycle. Reprinted from [<a href="#B32-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">32</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Taxonomy of IMUs for gait analysis [<a href="#B48-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">48</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Illustration of the medical and technological requirements for Internet of Health for gait monitoring. Adapted from [<a href="#B81-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">81</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Taxonomy of smart shoe for gait analysis illustrating existing research categories [<a href="#B1-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">1</a>,<a href="#B10-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">10</a>,<a href="#B15-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">15</a>,<a href="#B22-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">22</a>,<a href="#B25-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">25</a>,<a href="#B26-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">26</a>,<a href="#B27-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B55-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">55</a>,<a href="#B70-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">70</a>,<a href="#B73-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">73</a>,<a href="#B83-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">83</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Illustration of steps for estimating foot trajectory and spatiotemporal parameters based on literature analysis [<a href="#B9-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">9</a>,<a href="#B10-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">10</a>,<a href="#B15-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">15</a>,<a href="#B22-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">22</a>,<a href="#B25-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">25</a>,<a href="#B26-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">26</a>,<a href="#B27-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B70-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">70</a>,<a href="#B72-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">72</a>,<a href="#B73-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">73</a>,<a href="#B83-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">83</a>,<a href="#B85-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">85</a>,<a href="#B86-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">86</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Visualization of the gait segmentation based on the peak of acceleration signals. IC: initial contact, MS: mid-stance, TO: toe-off. Reprinted from [<a href="#B70-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">70</a>].</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 933 KiB  
Article
Vertical Jump Height Estimation Using Low-Sampling IMU in Countermovement Jumps: A Feasible Alternative to Motion Capture and Force Platforms
by Giacomo Villa, Alessandro Bonfiglio, Manuela Galli and Veronica Cimolin
Sensors 2024, 24(24), 7877; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24247877 - 10 Dec 2024
Viewed by 402
Abstract
Vertical jump height from a countermovement jump is a widespread metric to assess the lower limb functionality. Motion capture systems and force platforms are considered gold standards to estimate vertical jump height; however, their use in ecological settings is limited. This study aimed [...] Read more.
Vertical jump height from a countermovement jump is a widespread metric to assess the lower limb functionality. Motion capture systems and force platforms are considered gold standards to estimate vertical jump height; however, their use in ecological settings is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of low-sampling-rate inertial measurement units as an alternative to the gold standard systems. The validity of three computational methods for IMU-based data—numerical double integration, takeoff velocity, and flight time—was assessed using data from 18 healthy participants who performed five double-leg and ten single-leg countermovement jumps. The data were simultaneously collected from a motion capture system, two force platforms, and an IMU positioned at the L5 level. The comparisons revealed that the numerical double integration method exhibited the highest correlation (0.87) and the lowest bias (2.5 cm) compared to the gold standards and excellent reliability (0.88). Although the takeoff velocity and flight time methods demonstrated comparable performances for double-leg jumps, their accuracy in single-leg jumps was reduced. Overall, the low-sampling-rate IMU with the numerical double integration method seems to be a reliable and feasible alternative for field-based countermovement jump assessment, warranting future investigation across diverse populations and jump modalities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Integrated Circuit and System Design for Health Monitoring)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Main steps to obtain VJH from raw data of the three systems.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Bland–Altman Plots for VJH<sub>MCap</sub> and VJH<sub>FP.</sub> (<b>a</b>) DL-CMJ; (<b>b</b>) R-CMJ; (<b>c</b>) L-CMJ. The center lines represent the systematic bias between systems and the upper and lower LoA [n = 90].</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop