[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (175)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = error exponents

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
23 pages, 424 KiB  
Article
Joint Communication and Channel Discrimination
by Han Wu and Hamdi Joudeh
Entropy 2024, 26(12), 1089; https://doi.org/10.3390/e26121089 - 13 Dec 2024
Viewed by 275
Abstract
We consider a basic joint communication and sensing setup comprising a transmitter, a receiver and a sensor. The transmitter sends a codeword to the receiver through a discrete memoryless channel, and the receiver is interested in decoding the transmitted codeword. At the same [...] Read more.
We consider a basic joint communication and sensing setup comprising a transmitter, a receiver and a sensor. The transmitter sends a codeword to the receiver through a discrete memoryless channel, and the receiver is interested in decoding the transmitted codeword. At the same time, the sensor picks up a noisy version of the transmitted codeword through one of two possible discrete memoryless channels. The sensor knows the codeword and wishes to discriminate between the two possible channels, i.e., to identify the channel that has generated the output given the input. We study the trade-off between communication and sensing in the asymptotic regime, captured in terms of the channel coding rate against the two types of discrimination error exponents. We characterize the optimal trade-off between the rate and the exponents for general discrete memoryless channels with an input cost constraint. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Integrated Sensing and Communications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Illustration of the considered setting. A precise definition of all blocks is given in <a href="#sec2-entropy-26-01089" class="html-sec">Section 2</a>.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 578 KiB  
Article
Testing the Isotropic Cauchy Hypothesis
by Jihad Fahs, Ibrahim Abou-Faycal and Ibrahim Issa
Entropy 2024, 26(12), 1084; https://doi.org/10.3390/e26121084 - 11 Dec 2024
Viewed by 318
Abstract
The isotropic Cauchy distribution is a member of the central α-stable family that plays a role in the set of heavy-tailed distributions similar to that of the Gaussian density among finite second-moment laws. Given a sequence of n observations, we are interested [...] Read more.
The isotropic Cauchy distribution is a member of the central α-stable family that plays a role in the set of heavy-tailed distributions similar to that of the Gaussian density among finite second-moment laws. Given a sequence of n observations, we are interested in characterizing the performance of Likelihood Ratio Tests, where two hypotheses are plausible for the observed quantities: either isotropic Cauchy or isotropic Gaussian. Under various setups, we show that the probability of error of such detectors is not always exponentially decaying with n, with the leading term in the exponent shown to be logarithmic instead, and we determine the constants in that leading term. Perhaps surprisingly, the optimal Bayesian probabilities of error are found to exhibit different asymptotic behaviors. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Information Theory, Probability and Statistics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p><math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>ℓ</mo> <mo>(</mo> <mi>r</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> for <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msup> <mi>ξ</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, with <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (solid blue), <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>8</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (dashed green), and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>13</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (pointed red).</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p><math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mi>e</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> vs. <span class="html-italic">n</span> for <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>η</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.5</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>1.5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. Solid line: numerical computations. Dashed line: approximate expression.</p>
Full article ">Figure A2
<p><math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">G</mi> <mo>|</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">C</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math> vs. n for <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">C</mi> <mo>|</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">G</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.01</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>0.05</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>0.09</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. Solid line: numerical computations. Dashed line: approximate expression.</p>
Full article ">Figure A3
<p><math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mo form="prefix">ln</mo> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">C</mi> <mo>|</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">G</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> vs. n for <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">G</mi> <mo>|</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">C</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.07</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>0.14</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 4974 KiB  
Article
An Analysis of WiFi Coverage Modeling for a Hotspot in the Parish of Checa Employing Deterministic and Empirical Propagation Models
by Iván Sánchez, Fabricio Vallejo, Pablo Palacios Játiva and Ali Dehghan Firoozabadi
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(23), 11120; https://doi.org/10.3390/app142311120 - 28 Nov 2024
Viewed by 452
Abstract
This study presents the analysis and comparison of Wi-Fi coverage modeling for a hotspot using deterministic and empirical propagation models developed by researchers from the Universidad de Las Américas in Quito, Ecuador. Signal intensity measurements were taken from both the hotspot and the [...] Read more.
This study presents the analysis and comparison of Wi-Fi coverage modeling for a hotspot using deterministic and empirical propagation models developed by researchers from the Universidad de Las Américas in Quito, Ecuador. Signal intensity measurements were taken from both the hotspot and the repeater at various locations within the Checa parish using a Raspberry Pi and a Global Positioning System (GPS). To assess the accuracy of the models, heat maps were generated using Matlab (R2023A). The results showed that the adjusted model, comparing the received signal levels of the hotspot with the Stanford University Interim Propagation Model (SUI), exhibited a significant error margin, especially at distances below 60 m. However, starting at −70 dBm and beyond 60 m, the sampled data aligned better with the adjusted model. The discrepancy in the heatmaps was explained by the hotspot’s higher transmission power compared to the Wi-Fi repeater. Furthermore, the reception levels of the hotspot were low near the transmitter, which led to new measurements being taken with the Wi-Fi repeater (Raspberry Pi 3). With the new measurements, the adjusted model using logarithmic regression showed a better fit, particularly in the range from −40 dBm to −98 dBm, with a path loss exponent of 8.96. This demonstrated a significant improvement in prediction accuracy, particularly at short distances. The results emphasize the importance of using tools such as Matlab and reference models to optimize network planning, providing the Universidad de Las Américas with a valuable tool to generate heat maps in areas with characteristics similar to those of Checa in the context of their community outreach programs. This approach could be crucial for future research and optimization of community Wi-Fi networks in similar environments. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flowchart for adjusting a radio frequency signal propagation model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Photograph of Checa’s central park, showing the location of the repeater at the top, and the location of the hotspot at the bottom.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Radiation pattern lobes to 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Received power vs distance according to the SUI mode. Parameters: receiver height <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>h</mi> <mi>m</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> = 1.7 m, frequency <span class="html-italic">f</span> = 2.412 GHz, and Category C suburban areas [Equation (<a href="#FD6-applsci-14-11120" class="html-disp-formula">6</a>)].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Empirical samples obtained by the Raspberry Pi 3 of hotspot power levels vs distance in meters. Parameters: 560 samples of the reception level power.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Received Power levels vs distance using Equation (<a href="#FD6-applsci-14-11120" class="html-disp-formula">6</a>) of SUI model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparison between received power levels of the hotspot based on the SUI model [Equtation (<a href="#FD6-applsci-14-11120" class="html-disp-formula">6</a>)], the empirical data collected in the field, and the adjusted model [Equation (<a href="#FD8-applsci-14-11120" class="html-disp-formula">8</a>)] vs. distance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Received power levels vs distance using Equation (<a href="#FD8-applsci-14-11120" class="html-disp-formula">8</a>) the fitted model, at the site where the hotspot is installed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Received power levels vs distance using Equation (<a href="#FD8-applsci-14-11120" class="html-disp-formula">8</a>) the fitted model, at the site where the WiFi signal repeater is installed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Location map of the 560 empirical samples obtained the received power levels by Raspberry Pi 3 and GPS from the repeater the señal WiFi.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Heatmap of the 560 empirical samples of the received power levels by Raspberry Pi 3 and GPS from the repeater of the signal WiFi.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Model fitting graph based on the linear regression method [Equation (<a href="#FD13-applsci-14-11120" class="html-disp-formula">13</a>)].</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Model fitting graph based on the generation of a probabilistic logarithmic function [Equation (<a href="#FD14-applsci-14-11120" class="html-disp-formula">14</a>)].</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Comparison between received power levels of repeater WiFi based on the empirical data collected in the field, adjusted linear model [Equation (<a href="#FD13-applsci-14-11120" class="html-disp-formula">13</a>)], and the adjusted logarithmic model [Equation (<a href="#FD14-applsci-14-11120" class="html-disp-formula">14</a>)] vs distance at which WiFi signal repeater is installed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Model fitting graph based on the logarithmic regression method. Parameters: base height <span class="html-italic">h<sub>b</sub></span> = 5 m, receiver height <span class="html-italic">h<sub>m</sub></span> = 1.7 m, frequency <span class="html-italic">f</span> = 2.412 GHz, and suburban areas Category C.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 3387 KiB  
Article
How Gait Nonlinearities in Individuals Without Known Pathology Describe Metabolic Cost During Walking Using Artificial Neural Network and Multiple Linear Regression
by Arash Mohammadzadeh Gonabadi, Farahnaz Fallahtafti and Judith M. Burnfield
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(23), 11026; https://doi.org/10.3390/app142311026 - 27 Nov 2024
Viewed by 503
Abstract
This study uses Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) and multiple linear regression (MLR) models to explore the relationship between gait dynamics and the metabolic cost. Six nonlinear metrics—Lyapunov Exponents based on Rosenstein’s algorithm (LyER), Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFA), the Approximate Entropy (ApEn), the correlation [...] Read more.
This study uses Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) and multiple linear regression (MLR) models to explore the relationship between gait dynamics and the metabolic cost. Six nonlinear metrics—Lyapunov Exponents based on Rosenstein’s algorithm (LyER), Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFA), the Approximate Entropy (ApEn), the correlation dimension (CD), the Sample Entropy (SpEn), and Lyapunov Exponents based on Wolf’s algorithm (LyEW)—were utilized to predict the metabolic cost during walking. Time series data from 10 subjects walking under 13 conditions, with and without hip exoskeletons, were analyzed. Six ANN models, each corresponding to a nonlinear metric, were trained using the Levenberg–Marquardt backpropagation algorithm and compared with MLR models. Performance was assessed based on the mean squared error (MSE) and correlation coefficients. ANN models outperformed MLR, with DFA and Lyapunov Exponent models showing higher R2 values, indicating stronger predictive accuracy. The results suggest that gait’s nonlinear characteristics significantly impact the metabolic cost, and ANNs are more effective for analyzing these dynamics than MLR models. The study emphasizes the potential of focusing on specific nonlinear gait variables to enhance assistive device optimization, particularly for hip exoskeletons. These findings support the development of personalized interventions that improve walking efficiency and reduce metabolic demands, offering insights into the design of advanced assistive technologies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flow diagram of the research development process for predicting the metabolic cost using multiple linear regression (MLR) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) models, based on six gait nonlinearity measures: the Lyapunov Exponent based on Rosenstein’s algorithm (LyER), Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFA), the Approximate Entropy (ApEn), the correlation dimension (CD), the Sample Entropy (SpEn), and the Lyapunov Exponent based on Wolf’s algorithm (LyEW). The diagram outlines the sequential steps, from data collection and preparation through model design, cross-validation, and evaluation, and a comparative analysis of ANN and MLR models. Each variable represents specific gait parameters, including joint angles, velocities, moments, ground reaction forces (GRFs), and center of mass (COM) metrics. Key nonlinear measures for accurate metabolic cost prediction are emphasized, along with conclusions on the strengths and limitations of each model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Partial Dependence Plots (PDPs), the graphical analysis of gait nonlinearity measures, and their prediction errors. This figure illustrates the relationship between various gait parameters—such as joint angles, velocities, moments, center of mass (COM) displacement in the sagittal plane, and ground reaction force (GRF) magnitudes in vertical and anterior–posterior directions—and their influence on the prediction of the metabolic cost. Subfigures represent the mean of nonlinearity measures, (<b>A</b>) the Lyapunov Exponent based on Rosenstein’s algorithm (LyE<sub>R</sub>), (<b>B</b>) Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFA), (<b>C</b>) the Approximate Entropy (ApEn), (<b>D</b>) the correlation dimension (CD), (<b>E</b>) the Sample Entropy (SpEn), and (<b>F</b>) the Lyapunov Exponent based on Wolf’s algorithm (LyE<sub>w</sub>), respectively. Blue bars (left vertical axis) indicate the measure values, while red bars (right vertical axis) show the corresponding prediction error of energy expenditure percentages, highlighting the impact of each gait parameter on the precision of metabolic cost estimation.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 2094 KiB  
Article
Fractional Calculus Applied to the Generalized Model and Control of an Electrohydraulic System
by Edgar Hiram Robles, Felipe J. Torres, Antonio J. Balvantín-García, Israel Martínez-Ramírez, Gustavo Capilla and Juan-Pablo Ramírez-Paredes
Fractal Fract. 2024, 8(12), 679; https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract8120679 - 21 Nov 2024
Viewed by 466
Abstract
In this paper, fractional calculus is used to develop a generalized fractional dynamic model of an electrohydraulic system composed of a servo valve and a hydraulic cylinder, where a fractional position controller PIγDμ is proposed for minimizing the performance [...] Read more.
In this paper, fractional calculus is used to develop a generalized fractional dynamic model of an electrohydraulic system composed of a servo valve and a hydraulic cylinder, where a fractional position controller PIγDμ is proposed for minimizing the performance index according to the integral of the time-weighted absolute error (ITAE). First, the general mathematical equations of the cylinder and servo valve are used to obtain the transfer functions in fractional order by applying Caputo’s definition and a Laplace transform. Then, through a block diagram of the closed-loop system without a controller, the fractional model is validated by comparing its performance concerning the integer-order electrohydraulic system model reported in the literature. Subsequently, a fractional PID controller is designed to control the cylinder position. This controller is included in the closed-loop system to determine the fractional exponents of the transfer functions of the servo valve, cylinder, and control, as well as to tune the controller gains, by using the ITAE objective function, with a comparison of the following: (1) the electrohydraulic system model in integer order and the controller in fractional order; (2) the electrohydraulic system model in fractional order and the controller in integer order; and (3) both the system model and the controller in fractional order. For each of the above alternatives, numerical simulations were carried out using MATLAB®/Simulink® R2023b and adding white noise as a perturbation. The results show that strategy (3), where electrohydraulic system and controller model are given in fractional order, develops the best performance because it generates the minimum value of ITAE. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fractional-Order Approaches in Automation: Models and Algorithms)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The electrohydraulic system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Closed-loop fractional system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Fractional block in MATLAB<sup>®</sup>/Simulink<sup>®</sup>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Comparison of the system simulation results under step signal input in fractional and integer order.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Experimental test bench of the electrohydraulic system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Output response of the electrohydraulic system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Fractal spectrum of the electrohydraulic system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Experimental data of a flow rate measurement.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Simulation results of the system without noise under (<b>a</b>) step signal input, (<b>b</b>) sinusoidal signal input. Area of interest for the results under (<b>c</b>) step input, (<b>d</b>) sinusoidal signal input.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Simulation results of the integer-order system model with a fractional-order controller under (<b>a</b>) step signal input, (<b>b</b>) sinusoidal signal input. Area of interest for the results under (<b>c</b>) step input, (<b>d</b>) sinusoidal signal input.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Simulation results of the fractional-order system model with the integer-order controller under (<b>a</b>) step signal input, (<b>b</b>) sinusoidal signal input. Area of interest for the results under (<b>c</b>) step input; (<b>d</b>) sinusoidal signal input.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Simulation results of the fractional-order system model and controller under (<b>a</b>) step signal input, (<b>b</b>) sinusoidal signal input. Area of interest for the results under (<b>c</b>) step input, (<b>d</b>) sinusoidal signal input.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Simulation results of the fractional-order system model and controller with a signal of 0.002 power under (<b>a</b>) step signal input, (<b>b</b>) sinusoidal signal input. Area of interest for the results under (<b>c</b>) step input, (<b>d</b>) sinusoidal signal input.</p>
Full article ">
27 pages, 11457 KiB  
Article
From Polar Day to Polar Night: A Comprehensive Sun and Star Photometer Study of Trends in Arctic Aerosol Properties in Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard
by Sandra Graßl, Christoph Ritter, Jonas Wilsch, Richard Herrmann, Lionel Doppler and Roberto Román
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(19), 3725; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16193725 - 7 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1273
Abstract
The climate impact of Arctic aerosols, like the Arctic Haze, and their origin are not fully understood. Therefore, long-term aerosol observations in the Arctic are performed. In this study, we present a homogenised data set from a sun and star photometer operated in [...] Read more.
The climate impact of Arctic aerosols, like the Arctic Haze, and their origin are not fully understood. Therefore, long-term aerosol observations in the Arctic are performed. In this study, we present a homogenised data set from a sun and star photometer operated in the European Arctic, in Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard, of the 20 years from 2004–2023. Due to polar day and polar night, it is crucial to use observations of both instruments. Their data is evaluated in the same way and follows the cloud-screening procedure of AERONET. Additionally, an improved method for the calibration of the star photometer is presented. We found out, that autumn and winter are generally more polluted and have larger particles than summer. While the monthly median Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) decreases in spring, the AOD increases significantly in autumn. A clear signal of large particles during the Arctic Haze can not be distinguished from large aerosols in winter. With autocorrelation analysis, we found that AOD events usually occur with a duration of several hours. We also compared AOD events with large-scale processes, like large-scale oscillation patterns, sea ice, weather conditions, or wildfires in the Northern Hemisphere but did not find one single cause that clearly determines the Arctic AOD. Therefore the observed optical depth is a superposition of different aerosol sources. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Different relevant processes during polar day (<b>a</b>) and polar night (<b>b</b>). The numbers indicate (1) sea spray formation; (2a–b and 8) (non-)marine secondary aerosol formation; (3) particle processing in fog; (4) Arctic Ice Nucleation Particles (INP) concentrations; (5 and 7) Long-range transport; (6, 10 and 11) cloud formation; (9) blowing snow. Figure is adapted from Schmale et al. [<a href="#B14-remotesensing-16-03725" class="html-bibr">14</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Map of Ny-Ålesund on Svalbard in the European Arctic (source: Svalbardkartet (<a href="https://geokart.npolar.no/Html5Viewer/index.html?viewer=Svalbardkartet" target="_blank">https://geokart.npolar.no/Html5Viewer/index.html?viewer=Svalbardkartet</a>, accessed on 2 October 2024)); courtesy of Norwegian Polar Institute.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Relative availability of cloud-screened measurements <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>[</mo> <mo>%</mo> <mo>]</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> over the course of a year separated between sun and star photometer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Overview of combined photometer data. Every point is a daily median AOD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The monthly median values for the AOD is shown for each year of 2004–2023 in grey. The blue lines indicate the median (solid) and mean (dashed) of these values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Box-and-whisker plots for AOD for every month measured by sun and star photometer. All individual data points after cloud-screening are taken into account. As a reference for the amount of data per month and year, see <a href="#remotesensing-16-03725-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a>. 25th and 75th percentile are shown by the blue boxes, whiskers indicated 9th and 91th percentile, median is shown by <span style="color: #FF0000">−</span> and mean by <span style="color: #FF0000">+</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Deviation from monthly mean AOD values in dependency of the year.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>One exemplary day with PSC (9 February 2020), measured by the Raman Lidar KARL in Ny-Ålesund. The PSC is clearly visible in about 20 km altitude throughout the entire day.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Daily median of Ångström Exponent for sun and star photometer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Density plot of AOD and Ångström Exponent (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>A</mi> <mi>E</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>) for Sun (<b>left</b>) and star photometer (<b>right</b>) for all individual measurements from 2004 to 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Monthly median values of the Ångström Exponent is shown in grey for all of the years 2004 to 2023. The median (solid) and mean (dashed) of these annual cycle is given in orange.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Box-and-whisker plots for Ångström Exponent for every month measured by sun and star photometer. All individual data points after cloud screening are taken into account. As a reference for the amount of data per month and year, see <a href="#remotesensing-16-03725-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a>. The 25th and 75th percentile are shown by the blue boxes, whiskers indicate the 9th and 91st percentile, and the median is shown by <span style="color: #FF0000">−</span> and mean by <span style="color: #FF0000">+</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Deviation from monthly <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>A</mi> <mi>E</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> mean values to long-term median <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>A</mi> <mi>E</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Autocorrelations for each month across the 20-year period (shown in grey) are displayed. The green line represents the median autocorrelation function derived from all individual monthly autocorrelations. Vertical lines indicate key time intervals at 1 h and 1 day. Additionally, black diamonds highlight the vertexes within the data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Monthly median AOD values are given in blue. With a multiple linear regression this AOD is reconstructed by using the above-mentioned parameter coefficients.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 5813 KiB  
Article
Micromechanical Characterization of AlCu Films for MEMS Using Instrumented Indentation Method
by Dongyang Hou, Yuhang Ouyang, Zhen Zhou, Fang Dong and Sheng Liu
Materials 2024, 17(19), 4891; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17194891 - 5 Oct 2024
Viewed by 2913
Abstract
The micromechanical properties (i.e., hardness, elastic modulus, and stress–strain curve) of AlCu films were determined by an instrumented indentation test in this work. For three AlCu films with different thicknesses (i.e., 1 µm, 1.5 µm, and 2 µm), the same critical ratio ( [...] Read more.
The micromechanical properties (i.e., hardness, elastic modulus, and stress–strain curve) of AlCu films were determined by an instrumented indentation test in this work. For three AlCu films with different thicknesses (i.e., 1 µm, 1.5 µm, and 2 µm), the same critical ratio (hmax/t) of 0.15 and relative indentation depth range of 0.15–0.5 existed, within which the elastic modulus (i.e., 59 GPa) and nanoindentation hardness (i.e., 0.75 GPa, 0.64 GPa and 0.63 GPa for 1 µm, 1.5 µm and 2 µm films) without pile-up and substrate influence can be determined. The yield strength (i.e., 0.754 GPa, 0.549 GPa and 0.471 GPa for 1 µm, 1.5 µm and 2 µm films) and hardening exponent (i.e., 0.073, 0.131 and 0.150 for 1 µm, 1.5 µm and 2 µm films) of Al-(4 wt.%)Cu films for MEMS were successfully reported for the first time using a nanoindentation reverse method. In dimensional analysis, the ideal representative strain εr was determined to be 0.038. The errors of residual depth hr between the simulations and the nanoindentation experiments was less than 5% when the stress–strain curve obtained by the nanoindentation reverse method was used for simulation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances of Indentation Technology in Materials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic illustration of the geometry and mesh of 2D axisymmetric model used for nanoindentation simulations: (<b>a</b>) global view and (<b>b</b>) local view.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flow chart of the proposed reverse analysis method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The microstructural characterization of AlCu films with different thicknesses: SEM images of the cross-section for (<b>a</b>) 1 µm, (<b>b</b>) 1.5 µm and (<b>c</b>) 2 µm films; AFM images of surface topography for (<b>d</b>) 1 µm, (<b>e</b>) 1.5 µm and (<b>f</b>) 2 µm films; the roughness profile of surface topography for (<b>g</b>) 1 µm, (<b>h</b>) 1.5 µm and (<b>i</b>) 2 µm films; and (<b>j</b>) EDS spectra.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Variation in <span class="html-italic">H</span><sub>IT</sub> and <span class="html-italic">E</span><sub>IT</sub> of Si (111) substrate with <span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>max</sub>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Variations in (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <msubsup> <mi>E</mi> <mrow> <mi>IT</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>OP</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </semantics></math> and (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <msubsup> <mi>H</mi> <mrow> <mi>I</mi> <mi>T</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>O</mi> <mi>P</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </semantics></math> obtained by the OP method with <span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>max</sub>/<span class="html-italic">t</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Optical images of residual imprints of AlCu films with different thicknesses under applied load of 50 mN: (<b>a</b>) 1 µm, (<b>b</b>) 1.5 µm, and (<b>c</b>) 2 µm; (<b>d</b>) schematic illustration for calculating the projected area considering pile-up.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Variations in (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <msubsup> <mi>E</mi> <mrow> <mi>IT</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>CA</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </semantics></math> and (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <msubsup> <mi>H</mi> <mrow> <mi>IT</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>CA</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </semantics></math> obtained by the CACA method with <span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>max</sub>/<span class="html-italic">t</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) Variations in <span class="html-italic">C</span> with <span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>max</sub>/<span class="html-italic">t</span>; <span class="html-italic">F</span>-<span class="html-italic">h</span> curves of AlCu films with different thicknesses under different <span class="html-italic">F</span><sub>max</sub>: (<b>b</b>) 1 µm, (<b>c</b>) 1.5 µm, and (<b>d</b>) 2 µm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8 Cont.
<p>(<b>a</b>) Variations in <span class="html-italic">C</span> with <span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>max</sub>/<span class="html-italic">t</span>; <span class="html-italic">F</span>-<span class="html-italic">h</span> curves of AlCu films with different thicknesses under different <span class="html-italic">F</span><sub>max</sub>: (<b>b</b>) 1 µm, (<b>c</b>) 1.5 µm, and (<b>d</b>) 2 µm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Variation in <span class="html-italic">C</span>/<span class="html-italic">σ</span><sub>r</sub> with <span class="html-italic">E</span>*/<span class="html-italic">σ</span><sub>r</sub> for 2 µm AlCu film at different <span class="html-italic">n</span> and <span class="html-italic">ε</span><sub>r</sub>: (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">ε</span><sub>r</sub> = 0.010, (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">ε</span><sub>r</sub> = 0.038, and (<b>c</b>) <span class="html-italic">ε</span><sub>r</sub> = 0.290; and (<b>d</b>) the relationships between <span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>r</sub> and <span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>max</sub> for 0.15 &lt; <span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>max</sub>/<span class="html-italic">t</span> &lt; 0.5.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Variation in <span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>r</sub>/<span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>max</sub> as a function of <span class="html-italic">E</span>*/<span class="html-italic">σ</span><sub>r</sub> and <span class="html-italic">n</span> for 2 µm AlCu film.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The results and validation of <span class="html-italic">σ</span><sub>y</sub> obtained by the nanoindentation reverse method for Al-(4 wt.%)Cu films with different thicknesses: (<b>a</b>) stress–strain curves; (<b>b</b>) the comparison of <span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>r</sub> between simulation and experimental results; (<b>c</b>) the comparison of <span class="html-italic">σ</span><sub>y</sub> between this work and that reported by various methods in the literature: Macionczyk [<a href="#B79-materials-17-04891" class="html-bibr">79</a>], Nix [<a href="#B60-materials-17-04891" class="html-bibr">60</a>], Doerner [<a href="#B80-materials-17-04891" class="html-bibr">80</a>], Cai [<a href="#B81-materials-17-04891" class="html-bibr">81</a>], Yeo [<a href="#B5-materials-17-04891" class="html-bibr">5</a>], Stone [<a href="#B82-materials-17-04891" class="html-bibr">82</a>], Yu [<a href="#B83-materials-17-04891" class="html-bibr">83</a>], Hommel [<a href="#B84-materials-17-04891" class="html-bibr">84</a>], Balk [<a href="#B85-materials-17-04891" class="html-bibr">85</a>], Gouldstone [<a href="#B22-materials-17-04891" class="html-bibr">22</a>], Keller [<a href="#B71-materials-17-04891" class="html-bibr">71</a>], Flinn [<a href="#B72-materials-17-04891" class="html-bibr">72</a>], and Zhang [<a href="#B86-materials-17-04891" class="html-bibr">86</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>The independence test results of FEM mesh.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 603 KiB  
Article
Using Short Time Series of Monofractal Synthetic Fluctuations to Estimate the Foreign Exchange Rate: The Case of the US Dollar and the Chilean Peso (USD–CLP)
by Juan L. López, David Morales-Salinas and Daniel Toral-Acosta
Economies 2024, 12(10), 269; https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12100269 - 4 Oct 2024
Viewed by 652
Abstract
Short time series are fundamental in the foreign exchange market due to their ability to provide real-time information, allowing traders to react quickly to market movements, thus optimizing profits and mitigating risks. Economic transactions show a strong connection to foreign currencies, making exchange [...] Read more.
Short time series are fundamental in the foreign exchange market due to their ability to provide real-time information, allowing traders to react quickly to market movements, thus optimizing profits and mitigating risks. Economic transactions show a strong connection to foreign currencies, making exchange rate prediction challenging. In this study, the exchange rate estimation between the US dollar (USD) and the Chilean peso (CLP) for a short period, from 2 August 2021 to 31 August 2022, is modeled using the nonlinear Schrödinger equation (NLSE) and calculated with the fourth-order Runge–Kutta method, respectively. Additionally, the daily fluctuations of the current exchange rate are characterized using the Hurst exponent, H, and later used to generate short synthetic fluctuations to predict the USD–CLP exchange rate. The results show that the USD–CLP exchange rate can be estimated with an error of less than 5%, while when using short synthetic fluctuations, the exchange rate shows an error of less than 10%. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Macroeconomics, Monetary Economics, and Financial Markets)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Evolution of exchange rate between the USD and the CLP. (<b>a</b>) The original record containing 283 data points from 2 August 2021 to 31 August 2022. (<b>b</b>) The logarithmic differences record of the daily exchange rate.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The exchange rate between the USD and the CLP. The blue line is the actual data from 2 August 2021 to 31 August 2022, and the red line is the estimate using NLSE by RK4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Second-order fluctuations by applied of DFA on differences of the exchange rate USD–CLP in consecutive days.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Synthetic fluctuations with the Hurst exponent close to white noise <span class="html-italic">H</span> = 0.58. (<b>b</b>) The cumulative data for the synthetic fluctuations case.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The exchange rate between the USD and the CLP from 2 August 2021 to 31 August 2022. (<b>a</b>) The blue line is the actual data, and the color lines are the estimated exchange rate results of each aleatory and independent realization when synthetics fluctuation is used. (<b>b</b>) The blue line is the actual data, the red line is the estimate using NLSE by RK4, and the green line is the mean value of the estimated exchange rate for the synthetics fluctuations.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 1860 KiB  
Article
CHAM-CLAS: A Certificateless Aggregate Signature Scheme with Chameleon Hashing-Based Identity Authentication for VANETs
by Ahmad Kabil, Heba Aslan, Marianne A. Azer and Mohamed Rasslan
Cryptography 2024, 8(3), 43; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryptography8030043 - 17 Sep 2024
Viewed by 773
Abstract
Vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs), which are the backbone of intelligent transportation systems (ITSs), facilitate critical data exchanges between vehicles. This necessitates secure transmission, which requires guarantees of message availability, integrity, source authenticity, and user privacy. Moreover, the traceability of network participants is [...] Read more.
Vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs), which are the backbone of intelligent transportation systems (ITSs), facilitate critical data exchanges between vehicles. This necessitates secure transmission, which requires guarantees of message availability, integrity, source authenticity, and user privacy. Moreover, the traceability of network participants is essential as it deters malicious actors and allows lawful authorities to identify message senders for accountability. This introduces a challenge: balancing privacy with traceability. Conditional privacy-preserving authentication (CPPA) schemes are designed to mitigate this conflict. CPPA schemes utilize cryptographic protocols, including certificate-based schemes, group signatures, identity-based schemes, and certificateless schemes. Due to the critical time constraints in VANETs, efficient batch verification techniques are crucial. Combining certificateless schemes with batch verification leads to certificateless aggregate signature (CLAS) schemes. In this paper, cryptanalysis of Xiong’s CLAS scheme revealed its vulnerabilities to partial key replacement and identity replacement attacks, alongside mathematical errors in the batch verification process. Our proposed CLAS scheme remedies these issues by incorporating an identity authentication module that leverages chameleon hashing within elliptic curve cryptography (CHAM-CLAS). The signature and verification modules are also redesigned to address the identified vulnerabilities in Xiong’s scheme. Additionally, we implemented the small exponents test within the batch verification module to achieve Type III security. While this enhances security, it introduces a slight performance trade-off. Our scheme has been subjected to formal security and performance analyses to ensure robustness. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Visual diagram of Xiong’s scheme.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Attacks on Xiong’s scheme.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>A</b>) Visual diagram of our CHAM-HASH-based CLAS scheme; (<b>B</b>) Batch verification component of our CLAS scheme and proof of correctness.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Batch verification time (in milliseconds) for different values of n (number of signatures).</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 2140 KiB  
Article
A New Critical Plane Multiaxial Fatigue Criterion with an Exponent to Account for High Mean Stress Effect
by Mikel Abasolo, Luis Pallares-Santasmartas and Martin Eizmendi
Metals 2024, 14(9), 964; https://doi.org/10.3390/met14090964 - 26 Aug 2024
Viewed by 689
Abstract
The mean stress effect remains a critical aspect in multiaxial fatigue analysis. This work presents a new criterion that, based on the classical Findley criterion, applies a material-dependent exponent to the mean normal stress term and includes the ultimate tensile stress as a [...] Read more.
The mean stress effect remains a critical aspect in multiaxial fatigue analysis. This work presents a new criterion that, based on the classical Findley criterion, applies a material-dependent exponent to the mean normal stress term and includes the ultimate tensile stress as a fitting parameter. This way of considering the non-linear effect of the mean stress, with a material-dependent rather than a fixed exponent, is totally innovative among the multiaxial fatigue criteria found in the literature. In order to verify its accuracy, the new criterion has been checked against an extended version of the Papuga database of multiaxial experimental tests with 485 results, and compared with the criteria by Findley, Robert, and Papuga. The new criterion provides outstanding results for pure uniaxial cases, with multiaxial performance similar to the Robert criterion with a smaller range of error and a conservative trend, even surpassing the popular Papuga method in several relevant loading scenarios. These features enhance the applicability and versatility of the criterion for its use in the fatigue design of structural components. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Metal Failure Analysis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Experimental uniaxial results of Bomas et al. [<a href="#B29-metals-14-00964" class="html-bibr">29</a>] on SAE 52100 steel and theoretical predictions by Findley, Robert, and Papuga criteria.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Values of <span class="html-italic">c<sub>A</sub></span> in the Abasolo criterion: (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">κ</span> = 1.25, (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">κ</span> = 1.50, <span class="html-italic">(</span><b>c</b>) <span class="html-italic">κ</span> = 1.75.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Experimental results of four materials and theoretical predictions by the Findley, Robert, Papuga, and Abasolo criteria: (<b>a</b>) EN-GJV-450 cast iron [<a href="#B46-metals-14-00964" class="html-bibr">46</a>], (<b>b</b>) EN25 steel [<a href="#B41-metals-14-00964" class="html-bibr">41</a>], (<b>c</b>) SAE 52100 steel [<a href="#B29-metals-14-00964" class="html-bibr">29</a>], (d) EN-GJS-400-18 ductile cast iron [<a href="#B47-metals-14-00964" class="html-bibr">47</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Definition of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>σ</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mi>n</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>τ</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mi>t</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> in Mohr’s circle for a biaxial stress state.</p>
Full article ">Figure A2
<p>Value of parameter <span class="html-italic">c</span> for a material with <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>σ</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo>/</mo> <msub> <mrow> <mi>σ</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>u</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>σ</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo>/</mo> <msub> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <mi>σ</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2</mn> <mo>/</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>3 and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>σ</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo>/</mo> <msub> <mrow> <mi>τ</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.75</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, calculated according to Equation (A11).</p>
Full article ">Figure A3
<p>Value of parameter <span class="html-italic">c</span> for a material with <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>σ</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo>/</mo> <msub> <mrow> <mi>σ</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>u</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>σ</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo>/</mo> <msub> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <mi>σ</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2</mn> <mo>/</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>3 and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>σ</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo>/</mo> <msub> <mrow> <mi>τ</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.75</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, illustrated in previous <a href="#metals-14-00964-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>c, calculated according to Equation (A10).</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 6194 KiB  
Article
Construction of a Discrete Elemental Model for Clayey Soil Considering Pressure–Sinkage Nonlinear Relationship to Investigate Stress Transfer
by Zhuohuai Guan, Dong Jiang, Min Zhang, Haitong Li, Mei Jin and Tao Jiang
AgriEngineering 2024, 6(3), 2732-2748; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering6030159 - 7 Aug 2024
Viewed by 571
Abstract
The discrete element method (DEM) has been extensively utilized to investigate the mechanical properties of granules, particularly their microscopic behavior, overcoming limitations in field tests such as cost, time consumption, and soil condition restrictions. To ensure the development of reliable DEM simulations, proper [...] Read more.
The discrete element method (DEM) has been extensively utilized to investigate the mechanical properties of granules, particularly their microscopic behavior, overcoming limitations in field tests such as cost, time consumption, and soil condition restrictions. To ensure the development of reliable DEM simulations, proper contact model selection and parameter calibration are essential. In this research, a DEM parameter calibration method that could represent the nonlinear relationship between clayey soil pressure and sinkage at different moisture contents was proposed. Firstly, the sinking modulus K and the soil deformation exponent n were identified to reflect the nonlinear pressure–sinkage relationship. Then, sensitive DEM parameters on the soli pressure–sinkage relationship were investigated and calibrated, and the effect of moisture content on them was explored. Finally, the transfer of soil internal stress during subsidence was analyzed using the constructed discrete element model. The average error of the sinking modulus K and the soil deformation exponent n between the DEM and the experimental result at four moisture contents were 4.7% and 4.9%, respectively. The relative error of soil internal stress between simulation and experiment was 6.7%, 4.4%, and 9.7% at depths of 50 mm, 100 mm, and 150 mm, respectively. The soil particle trajectory, soil internal stress distribution, and variations during plate pressure–sinkage progress were analyzed by the constructed DEM model. The results demonstrated good agreement with theoretical models and experimental findings. The proposed clayey soil DEM modeling process that considers the pressure–sinkage nonlinear relationship at different moisture contents can be applied in machine-soil research. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The PST. (<b>a</b>) Physical test. (<b>b</b>) Simulation test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Soil internal stress test. (<b>a</b>) Experiment. (<b>b</b>) Simulation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The relationship between sinkage and stress at different soil moistures.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Simulation model stability test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Pareto chart of the parameters on the response. (<b>a</b>) On the sinking modulus K. (<b>b</b>) On soil deformation exponent n.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The effect of interaction factors on sinking modulus.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The DEM parameters vary with moisture content. (<b>a</b>) Soil–soil restitution coefficient. (<b>b</b>) Soil–soil static friction coefficient. (<b>c</b>) Surface energy. (<b>d</b>) Contact plasticity ratio.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Comparison of experimental and simulation for pressure–sinkage relationship under different moisture contents. (<b>a</b>) 13.2%. (<b>b</b>) 18.1%. (<b>c</b>) 22.7%. (<b>d</b>) 27.9%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Soil internal stress at different depths (22.7% moisture content).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Soil particle average total force during plate pressure–sinkage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Soil particle trajectory during plate pressure–sinkage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Soil stress clouds at different plate sinkage depths. (<b>a</b>) 10 mm. (<b>b</b>) 20 mm. (<b>c</b>) 30 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Variation curve of soil particle average total force with soil depth.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Soil particle trajectory at different depth sections.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Variation of soil stress cloud with plate sinking depth and section depth.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 7997 KiB  
Article
Spatial Localization of Transformer Inspection Robot Based on Adaptive Denoising and SCOT-β Generalized Cross-Correlation
by Hongxin Ji, Chao Zheng, Zijian Tang, Xinghua Liu and Liqing Liu
Sensors 2024, 24(15), 4937; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24154937 - 30 Jul 2024
Viewed by 852
Abstract
In the detection process of the internal defects of large oil-immersed transformers, due to the huge size of large transformers and metal-enclosed structures, the positional localization of miniature inspection robots inside the transformer faces great difficulties. To address this problem, this paper proposes [...] Read more.
In the detection process of the internal defects of large oil-immersed transformers, due to the huge size of large transformers and metal-enclosed structures, the positional localization of miniature inspection robots inside the transformer faces great difficulties. To address this problem, this paper proposes a three-dimensional positional localization method based on adaptive denoising and the SCOT weighting function with the addition of the exponent β (SCOT-β) generalized cross-correlation for L-type ultrasonic arrays of transformer internal inspection robots. Aiming at the strong noise interference in the field, the original signal is decomposed by an improved Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) method, and the optimal center frequency and bandwidth of each mode are adaptively searched. By extracting the modes in the frequency band of the positional localization signal, suppressing the modes in the noise frequency band, and reconstructing the Intrinsic Mode Function (IMF) of the independently selected superior modal components, a signal with a high signal-to-noise ratio is obtained. In addition, for the traditional mutual correlation algorithm with a large delay estimation error at a low signal-to-noise ratio, this paper adopts an improved generalized joint weighting function, SCOT-β, which improves the anti-jamming ability of the generalized mutual correlation method at a low signal-to-noise ratio by adding an exponential function to the denominator term of the SCOT weighting function’s generalized cross-correlation. Finally, the accurate positional localization of the transformer internal inspection robot is realized based on the quadratic L-array and search-based maximum likelihood estimation method. Simulation and experimental results show the following: the improved EMD denoising method better improves the signal-to-noise ratio of the positional localization signal with a lower distortion rate; in the transformer test tank, which is 120 cm in length, 100 cm in width, and 100 cm in height, based on the positional localization method in this paper, the average relative positional localization error of the transformer internal inspection robot in three-dimensional space is 2.27%, and the maximum positional localization error is less than 2 cm, which meets the requirements of engineering positional localization. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Sensors and Robotics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic diagram of the generalized cross-correlation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic diagram of spatial positional localization with the quadratic ultrasound array.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Simulated signal with a signal-to-noise ratio of −5 dB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Spectrogram of the simulated ultrasound signal.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Intrinsic modal components obtained with EMD decomposition: (<b>a</b>) IMF1; (<b>b</b>) IMF2; (<b>c</b>) IMF3; (<b>d</b>) IMF4; (<b>e</b>) IMF5; (<b>f</b>) IMF6; (<b>g</b>) IMF7; (<b>h</b>) IMF8; (<b>i</b>) IMF9; (<b>j</b>) Residual.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Intrinsic modal components obtained by the improved EMD algorithm decomposition: (<b>a</b>) IMF1; (<b>b</b>) IMF2; (<b>c</b>) IMF3; (<b>d</b>) IMF4; (<b>e</b>) IMF5; (<b>f</b>) IMF6.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The denoising result with the EMD algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The denoising results of the improved EMD algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Cross-correlation results obtained with different methods: (<b>a</b>) the result of basic cross-correlation; (<b>b</b>) the result of SCOT generalized cross-correlation; (<b>c</b>) the result of SCOT-β (β = 0.2); (<b>d</b>) the result of SCOT-β (β = 0.4); (<b>e</b>) the result of SCOT-β (β = 0.6); (<b>f</b>) the result of SCOT-β (β = 0.8).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Physical diagram of the 3D spatial positional localization test platform.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Schematic diagram of transformer internal inspection robot.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>L-shaped sensor array.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Ultrasound signals received by the ultrasound array: (<b>a</b>) Sensor No. 1; (<b>b</b>) Sensor No. 2; (<b>c</b>) Sensor No. 3; (<b>d</b>) Sensor No. 4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Ultrasonic waveforms after the denoising: (<b>a</b>) Sensor No. 1; (<b>b</b>) Sensor No. 2; (<b>c</b>) Sensor No. 3; (<b>d</b>) Sensor No. 4.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 2303 KiB  
Article
A Low-Computational Burden Closed-Form Approximated Expression for MSE Applicable for PTP with gfGn Environment
by Yehonatan Avraham and Monika Pinchas
Fractal Fract. 2024, 8(7), 418; https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract8070418 - 17 Jul 2024
Viewed by 664
Abstract
The Precision Time Protocol (PTP) plays a pivotal role in achieving precise frequency and time synchronization in computer networks. However, network delays and jitter in real systems introduce uncertainties that can compromise synchronization accuracy. Three clock skew estimators designed for the PTP scenario [...] Read more.
The Precision Time Protocol (PTP) plays a pivotal role in achieving precise frequency and time synchronization in computer networks. However, network delays and jitter in real systems introduce uncertainties that can compromise synchronization accuracy. Three clock skew estimators designed for the PTP scenario were obtained in our earlier work, complemented by closed-form approximations for the Mean Squared Error (MSE) under the generalized fractional Gaussian noise (gfGn) model, incorporating the Hurst exponent parameter (H) and the a parameter. These expressions offer crucial insights for network designers, aiding in the strategic selection and implementation of clock skew estimators. However, substantial computational resources are required to fit each expression to the gfGn model parameters (H and a) from the MSE perspective requirement. This paper introduces new closed-form estimates that approximate the MSE tailored to match gfGn scenarios that have a lower computational burden compared to the literature-known expressions and that are easily adaptable from the computational burden point of view to different pairs of H and a parameters. Thus, the system requires less substantial computational resources and might be more cost-effective. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fractional Processes and Systems in Computer Science and Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>PTP diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Performances of OWD clock skew estimators (<a href="#FD5-fractalfract-08-00418" class="html-disp-formula">5</a>) and (<a href="#FD6-fractalfract-08-00418" class="html-disp-formula">6</a>) for the gfGn case compared with the performances obtained with the newly derived closed−form estimates that approximate MSEs (<a href="#FD18-fractalfract-08-00418" class="html-disp-formula">18</a>) and (<a href="#FD19-fractalfract-08-00418" class="html-disp-formula">19</a>) associated with those clock skew estimators. <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>50</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> ppm, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>Q</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> ms, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mi>y</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>c</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>15.6</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> ms (64 packet/s), <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> ms, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mi>m</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.8</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> ms, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>σ</mi> <msub> <mi>ω</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <msub> <mi>σ</mi> <msub> <mi>ω</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>60</mn> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">μ</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>s. The <span class="html-italic">a</span> parameter: <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>a</mi> <mi>F</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>a</mi> <mi>R</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>a</b>) OWD clock skew estimator for Forward path (<a href="#FD5-fractalfract-08-00418" class="html-disp-formula">5</a>). (<b>b</b>) OWD clock skew estimator for Reveres path (<a href="#FD6-fractalfract-08-00418" class="html-disp-formula">6</a>). In total, 100 Monte Carlo trials were used to obtain the averaged results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Performances of OWD clock skew estimators (<a href="#FD5-fractalfract-08-00418" class="html-disp-formula">5</a>) and (<a href="#FD6-fractalfract-08-00418" class="html-disp-formula">6</a>) for the gfGn case compared with the performances obtained with the newly derived closed−form estimates that approximate MSEs (<a href="#FD18-fractalfract-08-00418" class="html-disp-formula">18</a>) and (<a href="#FD19-fractalfract-08-00418" class="html-disp-formula">19</a>) associated with those clock skew estimators. <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>50</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> ppm, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>Q</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> ms, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mi>y</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>c</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>15.6</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> ms (64 packet/s), <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> ms, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mi>m</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.8</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> ms, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>σ</mi> <msub> <mi>ω</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <msub> <mi>σ</mi> <msub> <mi>ω</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>60</mn> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">μ</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>s. The <span class="html-italic">a</span> parameter: <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>a</mi> <mi>F</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.05</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>a</mi> <mi>F</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.05</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>a</b>) OWD clock skew estimator for Forward path (<a href="#FD5-fractalfract-08-00418" class="html-disp-formula">5</a>). (<b>b</b>) OWD clock skew estimator for Reveres path (<a href="#FD6-fractalfract-08-00418" class="html-disp-formula">6</a>). In total, 100 Monte Carlo trials were used to obtain the averaged results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Performances of OWD clock skew estimators (<a href="#FD5-fractalfract-08-00418" class="html-disp-formula">5</a>) and (<a href="#FD6-fractalfract-08-00418" class="html-disp-formula">6</a>) for the gfGn case compared with the performances obtained with the newly derived closed−form estimates that approximate MSEs (<a href="#FD18-fractalfract-08-00418" class="html-disp-formula">18</a>) and (<a href="#FD19-fractalfract-08-00418" class="html-disp-formula">19</a>) associated with those clock skew estimators. <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>50</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> ppm, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>Q</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> ms, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mi>y</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>c</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>15.6</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> ms (64 packet/s), <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> ms, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mi>m</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.8</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> ms, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>σ</mi> <msub> <mi>ω</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <msub> <mi>σ</mi> <msub> <mi>ω</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>60</mn> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">μ</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>s. The <span class="html-italic">a</span> parameter: <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>a</mi> <mi>F</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.01</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>a</mi> <mi>R</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.01</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>a</b>) OWD clock skew estimator for Forward path (<a href="#FD5-fractalfract-08-00418" class="html-disp-formula">5</a>). (<b>b</b>) OWD clock skew estimator for Reveres path (<a href="#FD6-fractalfract-08-00418" class="html-disp-formula">6</a>). In total, 100 Monte Carlo trials were used to obtain the averaged results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Performances of OWD clock skew estimators (<a href="#FD5-fractalfract-08-00418" class="html-disp-formula">5</a>) and (<a href="#FD6-fractalfract-08-00418" class="html-disp-formula">6</a>) for the gfGn case compared with the performances obtained with the newly derived closed−form estimates that approximate MSEs (<a href="#FD44-fractalfract-08-00418" class="html-disp-formula">44</a>) and (<a href="#FD45-fractalfract-08-00418" class="html-disp-formula">45</a>) associated with those clock skew estimators. <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>50</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> ppm, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>Q</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> ms, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mi>y</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>c</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>15.6</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> ms (64 packet/s), <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> ms, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mi>m</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.8</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> ms, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>σ</mi> <msub> <mi>ω</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <msub> <mi>σ</mi> <msub> <mi>ω</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>60</mn> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">μ</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>s. For the <span class="html-italic">a</span> parameter that intends to zero, we set <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>a</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mi>μ</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>a</b>) OWD clock skew estimator for Forward path (<a href="#FD5-fractalfract-08-00418" class="html-disp-formula">5</a>). (<b>b</b>) OWD clock skew estimator for Reveres path (<a href="#FD6-fractalfract-08-00418" class="html-disp-formula">6</a>). In total, 100 Monte Carlo trials were used to obtain the averaged results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Performances of OWD clock skew estimators (<a href="#FD5-fractalfract-08-00418" class="html-disp-formula">5</a>) and (<a href="#FD6-fractalfract-08-00418" class="html-disp-formula">6</a>) for the gfGn case compared with the performances obtained with the newly derived closed−form approximated expressions for MSEs (<a href="#FD18-fractalfract-08-00418" class="html-disp-formula">18</a>) and (<a href="#FD19-fractalfract-08-00418" class="html-disp-formula">19</a>) related to those clock skew estimators. <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>50</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> ppm, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>Q</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> ms, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mi>y</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>c</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>15.6</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> ms (64 packet/s), <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> ms, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mi>m</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.8</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> ms, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>σ</mi> <msub> <mi>ω</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <msub> <mi>σ</mi> <msub> <mi>ω</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>60</mn> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">μ</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>s. The <span class="html-italic">a</span> parameter: <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>a</mi> <mi>F</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.6</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>a</mi> <mi>R</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.6</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>a</b>) OWD clock skew estimator for Forward path (<a href="#FD5-fractalfract-08-00418" class="html-disp-formula">5</a>). (<b>b</b>) OWD clock skew estimator for Reveres path (<a href="#FD6-fractalfract-08-00418" class="html-disp-formula">6</a>). In total, 100 Monte Carlo trials were used to obtain the averaged results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Performances of OWD clock skew estimators (<a href="#FD5-fractalfract-08-00418" class="html-disp-formula">5</a>) and (<a href="#FD6-fractalfract-08-00418" class="html-disp-formula">6</a>) for the gfGn case compared with the performances obtained with the newly derived closed−form approximated expressions for MSEs (<a href="#FD18-fractalfract-08-00418" class="html-disp-formula">18</a>) and (<a href="#FD19-fractalfract-08-00418" class="html-disp-formula">19</a>) related to those clock skew estimators. <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>50</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> ppm, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>Q</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> ms, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mi>y</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>c</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>15.6</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> ms (64 packet/s), <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> ms, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mi>m</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.8</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> ms, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>σ</mi> <msub> <mi>ω</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <msub> <mi>σ</mi> <msub> <mi>ω</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>60</mn> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">μ</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>s. The <span class="html-italic">a</span> parameter: <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>a</mi> <mi>F</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>a</mi> <mi>R</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>a</b>) OWD clock skew estimator for Forward path (<a href="#FD5-fractalfract-08-00418" class="html-disp-formula">5</a>). (<b>b</b>) OWD clock skew estimator for Reveres path (<a href="#FD6-fractalfract-08-00418" class="html-disp-formula">6</a>). In total, 100 Monte Carlo trials were used to obtain the averaged results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Performances of TWD clock skew estimator (<a href="#FD3-fractalfract-08-00418" class="html-disp-formula">3</a>) for the gfGn case compared with the performances obtained with the newly derived closed−form approximated expression for MSE (<a href="#FD17-fractalfract-08-00418" class="html-disp-formula">17</a>) related to this clock skew estimator. <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>50</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> ppm, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>Q</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> ms, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mi>y</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>c</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>15.6</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> ms (64 packet/s), <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> ms, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mi>m</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.8</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> ms, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>σ</mi> <msub> <mi>ω</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <msub> <mi>σ</mi> <msub> <mi>ω</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>60</mn> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">μ</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>s. The <span class="html-italic">a</span> parameter: (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>a</mi> <mi>F</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>a</mi> <mi>R</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>a</mi> <mi>F</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.6</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>a</mi> <mi>R</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.6</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. In total, 100 Monte Carlo trials were used to obtain the averaged results.</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 517 KiB  
Review
A Survey on Error Exponents in Distributed Hypothesis Testing: Connections with Information Theory, Interpretations, and Applications
by Sebastián Espinosa, Jorge F. Silva and Sandra Céspedes
Entropy 2024, 26(7), 596; https://doi.org/10.3390/e26070596 - 12 Jul 2024
Viewed by 906
Abstract
A central challenge in hypothesis testing (HT) lies in determining the optimal balance between Type I (false positive) and Type II (non-detection or false negative) error probabilities. Analyzing these errors’ exponential rate of convergence, known as error exponents, provides crucial insights into system [...] Read more.
A central challenge in hypothesis testing (HT) lies in determining the optimal balance between Type I (false positive) and Type II (non-detection or false negative) error probabilities. Analyzing these errors’ exponential rate of convergence, known as error exponents, provides crucial insights into system performance. Error exponents offer a lens through which we can understand how operational restrictions, such as resource constraints and impairments in communications, affect the accuracy of distributed inference in networked systems. This survey presents a comprehensive review of key results in HT, from the foundational Stein’s Lemma to recent advancements in distributed HT, all unified through the framework of error exponents. We explore asymptotic and non-asymptotic results, highlighting their implications for designing robust and efficient networked systems, such as event detection through lossy wireless sensor monitoring networks, collective perception-based object detection in vehicular environments, and clock synchronization in distributed environments, among others. We show that understanding the role of error exponents provides a valuable tool for optimizing decision-making and improving the reliability of networked systems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Entropy-Based Statistics and Their Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The general distributed test. <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>f</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mo>·</mo> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>g</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mo>·</mo> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math> are the two encoders and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ϕ</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mo>·</mo> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math> represents the detector (decision-maker).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The one-directional distributed test. <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>f</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mo>·</mo> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math> represents the encoder and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ϕ</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mo>·</mo> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math> is the detector.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The one-round distributed test. <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>f</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mo>·</mo> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>g</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mo>·</mo> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math> represent the encoders and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ϕ</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mo>·</mo> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math> is the detector.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>CNSs predicted by Theorem 8 across different values of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>δ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <msup> <mn>10</mn> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mi>k</mi> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>. The values used are for <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>I</mi> <mo>(</mo> <mi>X</mi> <mo>;</mo> <mi>Y</mi> <mo>)</mo> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, with <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>R</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> for the low-rate case and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>I</mi> <mo>(</mo> <mi>X</mi> <mo>;</mo> <mi>Y</mi> <mo>)</mo> <mo>=</mo> <mn>9</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>R</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>4</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> for the high-rate case.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 2791 KiB  
Article
Quantitative Inversion of Multiantenna Ground-Penetrating Radar Data with Modeling Error Correction Based on Long Short-Term Memory Cells
by Alessandro Fedeli, Valentina Schenone and Andrea Randazzo
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(12), 2050; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16122050 - 7 Jun 2024
Viewed by 645
Abstract
Quantitative inversion of GPR data opens the door to precise characterization of underground environments. However, in order to make the inverse scattering problem solution easier from a computational viewpoint, simplifying assumptions are often applied, i.e., two-dimensional approximations or the consideration of idealized field [...] Read more.
Quantitative inversion of GPR data opens the door to precise characterization of underground environments. However, in order to make the inverse scattering problem solution easier from a computational viewpoint, simplifying assumptions are often applied, i.e., two-dimensional approximations or the consideration of idealized field probes and electromagnetic sources. These assumptions usually produce modeling errors, which can degrade the dielectric reconstruction results considerably. In this article, a processing step based on long short-term memory cells is proposed for the first time to correct the modeling error in a multiantenna GPR setting. In particular, time-domain GPR data are fed into a neural network trained with couples of finite-difference time-domain simulations, where a set of sample targets are simulated in both realistic and idealized configurations. Once trained, the neural network outputs an approximation of multiantenna GPR data as they are collected by an ideal two-dimensional measurement setup. The inversion of the processed data is then accomplished by means of a regularizing Newton-based nonlinear scheme with variable exponent Lebesgue space formulation. A numerical study has been conducted to assess the capabilities of the proposed inversion methodology. The results indicate the possibility of effectively compensating for modeling error in the considered test cases. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microwave Tomography: Advancements and Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Configuration of the GPR multiantenna measurement setup (considering, as an example, the <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>-th view) and basic scheme of the proposed processing approach.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Proposed modeling error correction strategy based on the use of an LSTM cell.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Example of paired FDTD simulations adopted to train the neural network for modeling error correction: (<b>a</b>) 3D simulation with bowtie antennas; (<b>b</b>) 2D simulation of the same case with line-current sources and ideal field probes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Average relative root mean squared error on the reconstruction of the scattered electric field by the proposed neural network (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>e</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>U</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>) versus the number of neurons of FC layers (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>L</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>) and the LSTM cell state size (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>H</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Assessment of the processing of scattered field by the proposed method: (<b>a</b>) B-scan of the raw 3D data, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mover accent="true"> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold">U</mi> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">~</mo> </mover> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mi>c</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mfenced separators="|"> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </semantics></math>; (<b>b</b>) B-scan of the 2D canonical data, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold">U</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mi>c</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>a</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>t</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> <mfenced separators="|"> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </semantics></math>; (<b>c</b>) B-scan of the 3D data corrected by the LSTM-based method, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold">U</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mi>c</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mfenced separators="|"> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </semantics></math>; (<b>d</b>) difference between 2D canonical data and corrected 3D data, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold">U</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mi>c</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mfenced separators="|"> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> </mrow> </mfenced> <mo>−</mo> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold">U</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mi>c</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>a</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>t</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> <mfenced separators="|"> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </semantics></math>; (<b>e</b>) example of A-scan (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>k</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Distributions of the relative dielectric permittivity inside the subsurface investigation domain: (<b>a</b>) actual values; reconstruction using raw 3D data: (<b>b</b>) variable exponent Lebesgue space inversion algorithm, and (<b>c</b>) Hilbert space inversion algorithm; reconstruction using 2D canonical data: (<b>d</b>) variable exponent Lebesgue space inversion algorithm, and (<b>e</b>) Hilbert space inversion algorithm; reconstruction using 3D data corrected by the proposed approach: (<b>f</b>) variable exponent Lebesgue space inversion algorithm, and (<b>g</b>) Hilbert space inversion algorithm. White circle represents the true profile of the target.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop