[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (106)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = direct-sun measurement

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
17 pages, 6078 KiB  
Article
Verification of Spatial Heterodyne Spectral Velocimetry Technology Based on Solar Spectrum
by Xiang Peng, Mu Gu, Sujun Li, Qifeng Ren and Rujin Zhao
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(1), 68; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17010068 - 28 Dec 2024
Viewed by 461
Abstract
Deep space exploration is one of the key development directions in the aerospace field. With the significant increase in detection distance, the traditional space exploration methods may be ineffective due to effects such as signal energy attenuation and channel delay. There is an [...] Read more.
Deep space exploration is one of the key development directions in the aerospace field. With the significant increase in detection distance, the traditional space exploration methods may be ineffective due to effects such as signal energy attenuation and channel delay. There is an urgent need for a miniaturized, quasi-real-time, high-precision space velocity measurement instrument to be mounted on deep space aircraft and provide autonomous navigation. Spatial heterodyne spectral velocimetry technology is a newly proposed high-precision velocimetry method in recent years, and relevant research units have also obtained excellent measurement results in applications. However, this technology originally used laser light sources for active detection, which differs from the passive detection based on stellar light sources required for deep space vehicles in terms of prerequisites. Therefore, this article focuses on the technical route and feasibility exploration of using spatial heterodyne spectral velocimetry technology for stellar absorption spectrum and proposes a practical measurement scheme based on the technical principle of the background light synchronous cancellation method. We measured the radial velocity difference caused by the sun’s rotation at different positions on the solar image plane through outside validation experiments built in a simulated environment on the ground and obtained the experimental data with measurement deviation about 90 m/s and standard deviation about 55 m/s. The experimental results indicate that, under the current stability conditions of ground-based solar observation, we have achieved the same level of measurement accuracy as large ground-based telescopes by using instruments and equipment of much smaller size. It can be considered that the spatial heterodyne spectral velocity measurement scheme proposed in this article has achieved feasibility verification based on stellar spectral detection capability under the premise of instrument miniaturization and quasi-real-time processing. The research content provides a preliminary verification for the development of spatial heterodyne spectral velocimetry technology in the aerospace field and also provides reference for the realization of high-precision autonomous navigation capability in future aerospace technology. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Satellite Missions for Earth and Planetary Exploration)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Model of the solar atmosphere structure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Solar standard spectra (7540–7590 Å window).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Basic structure of SHS and DASH interferometer: (<b>a</b>) SHS; (<b>b</b>) DASH.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Schematic of the experimental structure with BLSE method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparison of simulation curves between background light and signal light.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Schematic of the overall optical path system for the field experiment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Schematic of the image received on the flange.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Blackbody radiation energy curves at temperatures of 6000 K and 7000 K.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Distribution of the solar spectrum around 589.6 nm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The incident spectrum selected for the experiment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The simulated interference signal waveform from the selected incident spectrum.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Efficiency function of the simulating solar spectrum.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Corresponding position relationship of the analyzed signal phase curve.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>The radial velocity field distribution on the solar surface: (<b>a</b>) 3D grid image; (<b>b</b>) surface splicing image.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Doppler velocity fitting based on NVST-measured solar photosphere spectrum.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 9878 KiB  
Article
Arctic Sea Ice Surface Temperature Retrieval from FengYun-3A MERSI-I Data
by Yachao Li, Tingting Liu, Zemin Wang, Mohammed Shokr, Menglin Yuan, Qiangqiang Yuan and Shiyu Wu
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(23), 4599; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16234599 - 7 Dec 2024
Viewed by 639
Abstract
Arctic sea-ice surface temperature (IST) is an important environmental and climatic parameter. Currently, wide-swath sea-ice surface temperature products have a spatial resolution of approximately 1000 m. The Medium Resolution Spectral Imager (MERSI-I) offers a thermal infrared channel with a wide-swath width of 2900 [...] Read more.
Arctic sea-ice surface temperature (IST) is an important environmental and climatic parameter. Currently, wide-swath sea-ice surface temperature products have a spatial resolution of approximately 1000 m. The Medium Resolution Spectral Imager (MERSI-I) offers a thermal infrared channel with a wide-swath width of 2900 km and a high spatial resolution of 250 m. In this study, we developed an applicable single-channel algorithm to retrieve ISTs from MERSI-I data. The algorithm accounts for the following challenges: (1) the wide range of incidence angle; (2) the unstable snow-covered ice surface; (3) the variation in atmospheric water vapor content; and (4) the unique spectral response function of MERSI-I. We reduced the impact of using a constant emissivity on the IST retrieval accuracy by simulating the directional emissivity. Different ice surface types were used in the simulation, and we recommend the sun crust type as the most suitable for IST retrieval. We estimated the real-time water vapor content using a band ratio method from the MERSI-I near-infrared data. The results show that the retrieved IST was lower than the buoy measurements, with a mean bias and root-mean-square error (RMSE) of −1.928 K and 2.616 K. The retrieved IST is higher than the IceBridge measurements, with a mean bias and RMSE of 1.056 K and 1.760 K. Compared with the original algorithm, the developed algorithm has higher accuracy and reliability. The sensitivity analysis shows that the atmospheric water vapor content with an error of 20% may lead to an IST retrieval error of less than 1.01 K. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Geodata Science and Spatial Analysis with Remote Sensing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The locations of the AERONET stations (red stars), buoys (yellow stars), and MERSI-I/MODIS images (blue rectangles) in the Arctic. Because of the movement of the buoys, the yellow stars may represent the same buoy at different times. The MERSI-I/ MODIS images are not the complete scenes, and only the overlapping areas between the two sensors are presented.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Temperature profiles in the snow and sea ice measured by the thermistor string installed in a CRREL buoy device. The colored lines denote the observation times. The dotted line denotes the snow–air interface. The data are from (<b>a</b>) 18 April 2010, and (<b>b</b>) 3 June 2011.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The flowchart of the developed algorithm for the MERSI-I TIR data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Modeled directional emissivity of five ice and snow types at 0–75 emergence angles in the 7–15 μm range. The ice and snow type and corresponding <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>f</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics> </math> values are listed in the subfigures (<b>a</b>–<b>e</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The ice and snow surface emissivity variation plot with the emergence angle and error in the IST caused by the ice and snow surface emissivity variation. The sea-ice surface type is sun crust (<math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>f</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics> </math> = 0.53).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The IST retrieval error from using the emissivity of different sea-ice surface types: (<b>a</b>–<b>e</b>) IST retrieval errors caused by using the emissivity values for fine dendrite snow, medium granular snow, coarse grained snow, sun crust snow, and bare glaze ice, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Scatter plots of the simulated AWVC and band ratios: (<b>a</b>)–(<b>c</b>) scatter plots of AWVC and band ratios <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>17</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics> </math>, <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>18</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics> </math>, and <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>19</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics> </math>, respectively. <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics> </math> is the band ratio of band <span class="html-italic">i</span> and band 16 (<span class="html-italic">i</span> = 17, 18, and 19).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Scatter plots of the predictions and ground truths for four parameters (transmissivity, <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>T</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>a</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics> </math>, atmospheric upwelling radiance, and downwelling radiance) based on the different fitting equations (linear, affine, and quadratic). The coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) values of the different scatter plots are listed in the subfigures.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Scatter plots of the ISTs from buoy data against the retrieved ISTs: (<b>a</b>) proposed algorithm; (<b>b</b>) ISC algorithm; (<b>c</b>) MODIS IST product.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Comparison with the IST from the IceBridge measurements; (<b>a</b>) locations of the comparison points; (<b>b</b>) comparison between the IST from the proposed algorithm and the IST from the IceBridge measurements; (<b>c</b>) comparison between the IST from the proposed ISC algorithm and the IST from the IceBridge measurements.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Comparison between the spatial maps of the IST from the MERSI-I ISC algorithm and the MODIS IST product over subsections of the Arctic. The two columns on the left are MERSI-I and MODIS IST. The right column presents the scatter plots of the ISTs from the two datasets. The dates of the images are shown in the spatial maps.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Scatter plots of the retrieved AWVC from MERSI-I and AERONET: (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) accuracy verification with and without including R<sub>19</sub>, respectively.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 3391 KiB  
Article
Bioactivity of Grape Pomace Extract and Sodium Selenite, Key Components of the OenoGrape Advanced Complex, on Target Human Cells: Intracellular ROS Scavenging and Nrf2/ARE Induction Following In Vitro Intestinal Absorption
by Cécile Dufour, Camille Gironde, Mylène Rigal, Christophe Furger and Erwan Le Roux
Antioxidants 2024, 13(11), 1392; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox13111392 - 14 Nov 2024
Viewed by 703
Abstract
Oenobiol Sun Expert, a food formulation designed to enhance skin health prior to sun exposure, has been optimized by incorporating the OenoGrape Advanced Complex, which includes grape pomace extract, increased selenium content and 10% lycopene-rich tomato extract, with these constituents exhibiting high antioxidant [...] Read more.
Oenobiol Sun Expert, a food formulation designed to enhance skin health prior to sun exposure, has been optimized by incorporating the OenoGrape Advanced Complex, which includes grape pomace extract, increased selenium content and 10% lycopene-rich tomato extract, with these constituents exhibiting high antioxidant potential. To evaluate the effects of these individual ingredients and the overall formulation at the cellular level, the AOP1 cell antioxidant efficacy assay was employed to measure the intracellular free radical scavenging activity, while the Cell Antioxidant Assay (CAA or DCFH-DA) assay was used to assess peroxidation scavenging at the plasma membrane level. The indirect antioxidant activity was examined using stably transfected cell lines containing a luciferase reporter gene controlled by the Antioxidant Response Element (ARE), which activates the endogenous antioxidant system via the Nrf2/Keap1-ARE pathway. Our results indicate that among the individual components, grape pomace extract and sodium selenite possess high and complementary antioxidant properties. Grape pomace extract was particularly effective in inhibiting free radicals (AOP1 EC50 = 6.80 μg/mL) and activating the ARE pathway (ARE EC50 = 231.1 μg/mL), whereas sodium selenite exerted its effects through potent ARE activation at sub-microgram levels (EC50 = 0.367 μg/mL). In contrast, the lycopene-rich tomato extract did not show a notable contribution to the antioxidant effects. The antiradical activity of the OenoGrape Advanced Complex, comprising these three ingredients, was very efficient and consistent with the results obtained for the individual components (AOP1 EC50 = 15.78 µg/mL and ARE EC50 of 707.7 μg/mL). Similarly, the free radical scavenging activity still persisted in the Oenobiol Sun Expert formulation (AOP1 EC50 = 36.63 µg/mL). Next, in vitro intestinal transepithelial transfer experiments were performed. The basolateral compartments of cells exposed to the ingredients were collected and assessed using the same antioxidant cell assays. The direct and indirect antioxidant activities were measured on both hepatocytes and keratinocytes, demonstrating the bioavailability and bioactivity of grape pomace extract and sodium selenite. These finding suggest that the ingredients of this food supplement contribute to enhanced cytoprotection following ingestion. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antioxidant and Protective Effects of Plant Extracts—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The intracellular ROS scavenging activity of three individual ingredients was assessed on HepG2 cells using the AOP1 bioassay. HepG2 cells were incubated for 1 h with increasing concentrations of a 10% lycopene-rich tomato extract (<b>A</b>), sodium selenite (<b>B</b>) and grape pomace extract (<b>C</b>). Left panel: kinetic fluorescence profiles, where the <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis represents the light flash number, and the <span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis displays the Relative Fluorescence Unit (RFU) values for each sample concentration. <b>Middle panel</b>: Antioxidant Index (AI) values calculated for each concentration. <b>Right panel</b>: dose–response curves with the log-transformed concentration on the <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis and the AI on the <span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis. Data points: mean RFU value from triplicate wells; error bars: standard deviation (SD); EC<sub>50</sub>: efficacy concentration required to achieve 50% of the maximum effect; R<sup>2</sup>: coefficient of determination for the dose–response fit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Intracellular ROS scavenging activity on HepG2 cells was assessed for OenoGrape Advanced Complex, Oenobiol Sun Expert and Oenobiol Solaire Intensif formulations. HepG2 cells were incubated for 1 h with increasing concentrations of OenoGrape Advanced Complex (<b>A</b>), Oenobiol Sun Expert (<b>B</b>) and Oenobiol Solaire Intensif formulations (<b>C</b>). <b>Left panel:</b> kinetic profile of AOP1 biosensor fluorescence, where the <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis represents light flashes, and the <span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis shows relative fluorescence unit (RFU) values recorded for each concentration. <b>Middle panel:</b> Antioxidant Index (AI) calculated for each concentration. <b>Right panel:</b> dose–response curves, with the <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis representing the log-transformed concentration and the <span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis the Antioxidant Index (AI) values. Data points: mean RFU values from triplicate measurements; error bars: SD; EC<sub>50</sub>: efficacy concentration required for 50% efficacity; R<sup>2</sup>: coefficient of determination for the dose–response fit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The cell membrane radical scavenging activity of a 10% lycopene-rich extract, the OenoGrape Advanced Complex and Oenobiol Sun Expert formulation was evaluated in HepG2 cells using the CAA or AAPH/DCFH-DA assay. HepG2 cells were incubated for 4 h with varying concentrations of the 10% lycopene-rich tomato extract (<b>A</b>), OenoGrape Advanced Complex (<b>B</b>) and Oenobiol Sun Expert formulation (<b>C</b>). <b>Left panel:</b> fluorescence emission kinetics of the DCFH probe. <b>Middle panel:</b> Antioxidant Index (AI) calculated for each concentration. <b>Right panel:</b> dose–response curves. Data points: mean RFUs of triplicate wells; error bars: SD; EC<sub>50</sub>: efficacy concentrations at which 50% efficacity is observed; R<sup>2</sup>: coefficient of determination for the dose–response fit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The ARE transcriptional activity of the three individual ingredients was assessed on ARE-luc-HepG2 cells. ARE–luciferase–HepG2 cells were treated for 17 h with a range of concentrations of 10% lycopene-rich tomato extract (<b>A</b>), sodium selenite (<b>B</b>) and grape pomace extract (<b>C</b>), and the luciferase luminescence was measured as relative luminescence units. <b>Left panel:</b> the graphs display the luciferase gene expression as the fold increase (FI) relative to the vehicle control. <b>Right panel</b>: the dose–response curves are represented, where the log-transformed concentrations are plotted on the <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis against the fold increase in the gene expression (FI). Data points: mean FI of duplicate measurements; error bars: SD; EC<sub>50</sub>: efficacy concentration required for 50% of the maximum effect; R<sup>2</sup>: coefficient of determination for the dose–response curve.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The ARE transcriptional activity of the OenoGrape Advanced Complex, Oenobiol Sun Expert and Solaire Intensif formulations was evaluated on ARE-luc-HepG2 cells. ARE–luciferase–HepG2 cells were treated for 17 h with a range of concentrations of the OenoGrape Advanced Complex (<b>A</b>), Oenobiol Sun Expert (<b>B</b>) and Solaire Intensif (<b>C</b>) formulations, and the luciferase luminescence was measured. The left panel displays the fold increase in gene expression (FI) relative to the vehicle control, while the right panel presents the dose–response curves with the log-transformed concentrations plotted on the <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis and the fold increase in gene expression (FI) on the <span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis. Data points: the mean fold increase in gene expression (FI) of duplicate measurements; error bars: SD; EC<sub>50</sub>: efficacy concentration required to achieve 50% of the maximum effect; R<sup>2</sup>: coefficient of determination for the dose–response fit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>A comparative analysis of the ROS scavenging activity (AOP1 assay) in HepG2 cells was performed for the Oenobiol Sun Expert formulation, before and after intestinal transepithelial transfer. HepG2 cells were treated with increasing concentrations of raw Oenobiol Sun Expert (panel (<b>A</b>)) and with serial dilutions of the basolateral fractions obtained from Caco2 cells following a 1 h incubation with Oenobiol Sun Expert (panel (<b>B</b>)). Top panel: kinetic fluorescence profiles, with the <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis representing the light flash number and the <span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis showing the normalized Relative Fluorescence Unit (RFU) values. Bottom panel: dose–response curves, where log concentrations or log dilutions are plotted on the <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis and the Antioxidant Index on the <span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis. Data points: mean RFUs of triplicate measurements; error bars: SD; EC<sub>50</sub>: efficacy concentrations at 50% effect; R<sup>2</sup>: coefficient of determination.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>A comparison of the ROS scavenging activity (AOP1 assay) in HepG2 cells was conducted for grape pomace extract before and after intestinal transepithelial transfer. HepG2 cells were treated with increasing concentrations of raw grape pomace extract (panel (<b>A</b>)) and increasing dilutions of basolateral fractions collected from Caco2 cells following a 1 h incubation with either 25 mg/mL (panel (<b>B</b>)) or 6 mg/mL (panel (<b>C</b>)) grape pomace extract. Top panel: kinetic fluorescence profiles, with the light flash number on the <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis and the normalized Relative Fluorescence Unit (RFU) values on the <span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis. Bottom panel: dose–response curves, with log concentrations or log dilutions plotted on the <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis and the Antioxidant Index on the <span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis. Data points: mean RFUs from triplicate measurements; bars: SD; EC<sub>50</sub>: efficacy concentrations at 50% effect; R<sup>2</sup>: coefficient of determination.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>A comparison of the ROS scavenging activity (AOP1 assay) in HaCaT cells was performed for the Oenobiol Sun Expert formulation before and after intestinal transepithelial transfer. HaCaT cells were treated with increasing concentrations of raw Oenobiol Sun Expert (panel (<b>A</b>)) and increasing dilutions of basolateral fractions obtained from Caco2 cells after a 1 h incubation with Oenobiol Sun Expert (panel (<b>B</b>)). Top panel: kinetic fluorescence profiles, with the light flash number on the <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis and the normalized Relative Fluorescence Unit (RFU) values on the <span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis. Bottom panel: dose–response curves, with log concentrations or log dilutions plotted on the <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis and the Antioxidant Index on the <span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis. Data points: mean RFUs of triplicate measurements; bars: SD; EC<sub>50</sub>: efficacy concentrations at 50% effect; R<sup>2</sup>: coefficient of determination.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>A comparison of the ROS scavenging activity (AOP1 test) was conducted on HacaT cells for grape pomace extract before and after intestinal transepithelial transfer. HaCaT cells were treated with increasing concentrations of raw grape pomace extract (panel (<b>A</b>)) and increasing dilutions of basolateral fractions from Caco2 cells after a 1 h incubation with 25 mg/mL (panel (<b>B</b>)) or 6 mg/mL (panel (<b>C</b>)) of grape pomace extract. Top panel: kinetic fluorescence profiles, with the light flash number on the <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis and the normalized Relative Fluorescence Unit (RFU) values on the <span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis. Bottom panel: dose–response curves with log concentrations or log dilutions plotted on the <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis and the Antioxidant Index on the <span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis. Data points: mean RFUs of triplicate measurements; bars: SD; EC<sub>50</sub>: efficacy concentrations at 50% effect; R<sup>2</sup>: coefficient of determination.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>A comparison of ARE transcriptional activity comparison in ARE–luciferase–HepG2 cells was conducted for sodium selenite before and after intestinal transfer. ARE–luciferase–HepG2 cells were treated for 17 h with a range of sodium selenite concentrations (panel (<b>A</b>)) or dilutions of basolateral compartments collected from Caco2 cells after a 1 h incubation with 10 or 20 μg/mL sodium selenite (panel (<b>B</b>)). Luciferase luminescence was measured as an indicator of ARE pathway activation. The graphs depict the gene expression fold increase (FI) relative to the vehicle control for either decreasing concentrations of sodium selenite or varying dilutions of the basolateral fractions. Data points: mean fold increase (FI) of duplicate measurements; bars: SD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>A comparison of ARE transcriptional activity in ARE–luciferase–HacaT cells was conducted for sodium selenite before and after intestinal transfer. ARE–luciferase–HacaT cells were treated for 17 h with a range of concentrations of sodium selenite (panel (<b>A</b>)) or dilutions of basolateral fractions collected from Caco2 cells following a 1 h incubation with 10 or 20 μg/mL sodium selenite (panel (<b>B</b>)). Luciferase luminescence was measured to assess ARE pathway activation. The graphs display the fold increase (FI) in gene expression compared to the vehicle control for either decreasing concentrations of sodium selenite or different dilutions of the basolateral fractions. Data points: mean fold increase (FI) of duplicate measurements; bars: SD.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 11953 KiB  
Article
Investigation of Bus Shelters and Their Thermal Environment in Hot–Humid Areas—A Case Study in Guangzhou
by Yan Pan, Shan Li and Xiaoxiang Tang
Buildings 2024, 14(8), 2377; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14082377 - 1 Aug 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1011
Abstract
The acceleration of urbanization intensifies the urban heat island, outdoor activities (especially the road travel) are seriously affected by the overheating environment, and the comfort and safety of the bus shelter as an accessory facility of road travel are crucial to the passenger’s [...] Read more.
The acceleration of urbanization intensifies the urban heat island, outdoor activities (especially the road travel) are seriously affected by the overheating environment, and the comfort and safety of the bus shelter as an accessory facility of road travel are crucial to the passenger’s experience. This study investigated the basic information (e.g., distribution, orientation) of 373 bus shelters in Guangzhou and extracted the typical style by classifying the characteristics of these bus shelters. Additionally, we also measured the thermal environment of some bus shelters in summer and investigated the cooling behavior of passengers in such an environment. The results show that the typical style of bus shelters in the core area of Guangzhou is north–south orientation, with only one station board at the end of the bus, two backboards, two roofs (opaque green), and the underlying surface is made of red permeable brick. The air temperature and relative humidity under different bus shelters, tree shading areas, and open space in summer are 34–37 °C and 49–56%, respectively. For the bus shelters with heavy traffic loads, the air temperature is basically above 35.5 °C, and the thermal environment is not comfortable. During the hot summer, when there is no bus shelter or trees to shade the sun, the waiting people adjust their position with the sun’s height, azimuth angles, and direct solar radiation intensity to reduce the received radiation as much as possible, which brings great inconvenience to them. When only bus shelters provide shade, people tend to gather in the shaded space, and cooling measures such as umbrellas, hats, and small fans are still needed to alleviate thermal discomfort. However, the aforementioned various spontaneous cooling behaviors still cannot effectively alleviate overheating, and it is very important to increase auxiliary cooling facilities in bus shelters. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Workflow of investigation of bus shelters, their thermal environment, and cooling behaviors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Distribution of survey objects (the area around the red line is the core area of Guangzhou).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The combined bus shelters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The distribution location and route of the measured bus shelters in Tianhe District, Guangzhou.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The measured sites, bus shelter in (<b>a</b>) Changfu Road Station, (<b>b</b>) Changxing Road Station, (<b>c</b>) Tianhe Passenger Station, (<b>d</b>) Tianyuan Road Station, (<b>e</b>) measured site under the tree, (<b>f</b>) measured site with no shading.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The statistics of shooting date and orientation of bus shelters, (<b>a</b>) shooting date of Street View map, (<b>b</b>) orientations of bus shelters in different districts, (<b>c</b>) proportion of bus shelter orientations of Guangzhou.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The proportion of combined bus shelters and bus shelters with two boards in different districts.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) Proportion of bus shelters with different number of roofs (excluding public telephone booths) in different districts, (<b>b</b>) proportion of bus shelters with different number of roofs (excluding public telephone booths) in Guangzhou, (<b>c</b>) Enning Road bus station in Liwan District.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a</b>) Proportion of bus shelters with different number of roofs (including public telephone booths) in different districts, (<b>b</b>) proportion of bus shelters with different number of roofs (including public telephone booths) in Guangzhou.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The common types of roofs for the investigated bus shelters, (<b>a</b>) opaque green roof, (<b>b</b>) translucent roof, and (<b>c</b>) opaque gray roof.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The different types of underlay surfaces of investigated bus shelters, (<b>a</b>) gray permeable brick, (<b>b</b>) red permeable brick, (<b>c</b>) impervious brick, and (<b>d</b>) cement.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The proportion of (<b>a</b>) roofs and (<b>b</b>) underlying surfaces for the investigated bus shelters in Guangzhou.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>A typical bus shelter in Guangzhou (Light Industrial Secondary School Station).</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>(<b>a</b>) Air temperature and relative humidity (RH), (<b>b</b>) wind speed, and (<b>c</b>) black globe temperature (<span class="html-italic">T</span><sub>g</sub>) and mean radiant temperature (MRT) at each measured point.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>The cooling behaviors of waiting people in the bus stations with only station boards, (<b>a</b>) crouching in the shadow of board, (<b>b</b>) carrying umbrella.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>The cooling behaviors in the bus shelters without trees around, (<b>a</b>) standing or sitting in the shaded space, (<b>b</b>) wearing hats, (<b>c</b>) fanning clothes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>The cooling behaviors in the bus shelters with trees, (<b>a</b>) Tianhe Passenger Station, (<b>b</b>) Jianshe Road Station.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 16351 KiB  
Article
Fine-Scale Quantification of the Effect of Maize Tassel on Canopy Reflectance with 3D Radiative Transfer Modeling
by Youyi Jiang, Zhida Cheng, Guijun Yang, Dan Zhao, Chengjian Zhang, Bo Xu, Haikuan Feng, Ziheng Feng, Lipeng Ren, Yuan Zhang and Hao Yang
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(15), 2721; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16152721 - 25 Jul 2024
Viewed by 944
Abstract
Quantifying the effect of maize tassel on canopy reflectance is essential for creating a tasseling progress monitoring index, aiding precision agriculture monitoring, and understanding vegetation canopy radiative transfer. Traditional field measurements often struggle to detect the subtle reflectance differences caused by tassels due [...] Read more.
Quantifying the effect of maize tassel on canopy reflectance is essential for creating a tasseling progress monitoring index, aiding precision agriculture monitoring, and understanding vegetation canopy radiative transfer. Traditional field measurements often struggle to detect the subtle reflectance differences caused by tassels due to complex environmental factors and challenges in controlling variables. The three-dimensional (3D) radiative transfer model offers a reliable method to study this relationship by accurately simulating interactions between solar radiation and canopy structure. This study used the LESS (large-scale remote sensing data and image simulation framework) model to analyze the impact of maize tassels on visible and near-infrared reflectance in heterogeneous 3D scenes by modifying the structural and optical properties of canopy components. We also examined the anisotropic characteristics of tassel effects on canopy reflectance and explored the mechanisms behind these effects based on the quantified contributions of the optical properties of canopy components. The results showed that (1) the effect of tassels under different planting densities mainly manifests in the near-infrared band of the canopy spectrum, with a variation magnitude of ±0.04. In contrast, the impact of tassels on different leaf area index (LAI) shows a smaller response difference, with a magnitude of ±0.01. As tassels change from green to gray during growth, their effect on reducing canopy reflectance increases. (2) The effect of maize tassel on canopy reflectance varied with spectral bands and showed an obvious directional effect. In the red band at the same sun position, the difference in tassel effect caused by the observed zenith angle on canopy reflectance reaches 200%, while in the near-infrared band, the difference is as high as 400%. The hotspot effect of the canopy has a significant weakening effect on the shadow effect of the tassel. (3) The non-transmittance optical properties of maize tassels reduce canopy reflectance, while their high reflectance increases it. Thus, the dual effects of tassels create a game in canopy reflectance, with the final outcome mainly depending on the sensitivity of the canopy spectrum to transmittance. This study demonstrates the potential of using 3D radiative transfer models to quantify the effects of crop fine structure on canopy reflectance and provides some insights for optimizing crop structure and implementing precision agriculture management (such as selective breeding of crop optimal plant type). Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Overview of the study area. (<b>a</b>) Location of the study area; (<b>b</b>) UAV image of the experimental spot.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Observation instrument and artificial tassel cutting test site. (<b>a</b>) DJI P4 Multispectral; (<b>b</b>) ASD FieldSpec 4 Hi-Res; (<b>c</b>) maize trial plot.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Data acquisition process of maize stem and leaf structure. (<b>a</b>) Artec Leo Scanner; (<b>b</b>) indoor scanning; (<b>c</b>) 3D structure of maize.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Schematic diagram of 3D phenotypic measurement system for maize tassel.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>3D reconstruction of maize tassel.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Maize tassel reflectance measurement process. (<b>a</b>) Maize tassels at different growth stages; (<b>b</b>) measurement scenarios.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparison of measured and simulated values of canopy reflectance in tassel cutting experiment. In this figure, the vertical axis label Difference of reflectance represents the reflectance difference between the with and without tassel canopy (same as below).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>3D reconstruction results of maize tassel. (<b>a</b>) Compact type; (<b>b</b>) fewer tassel branches type; (<b>c</b>) loose type.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Canopy reflectance difference caused by different tassel structures. (<b>a</b>) Vertical observation; (<b>b</b>) hotspot direction; (<b>c</b>) dark spot direction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Canopy reflectance difference caused by tassels at different growth stages. (<b>a</b>) Input spectra of the LESS model; (<b>b</b>) vertical observation; (<b>c</b>) hotspot direction; (<b>d</b>) dark spot direction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>3D scene top view of different planting densities. (<b>a</b>) 60,000 plants/hm<sup>2</sup>; (<b>b</b>) 75,000 plants/hm<sup>2</sup>; (<b>c</b>) 90,000 plants/hm<sup>2</sup>; (<b>d</b>) 120,000 plants/hm<sup>2</sup>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The reflectance difference between the with and without tassel canopy under different planting densities. (<b>a</b>) Vertical observation; (<b>b</b>) hotspot direction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>The difference of maximum tassel effect under different planting densities. (<b>a</b>) Visible band; (<b>b</b>) near-infrared band.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>The difference in tassel effect under different planting densities. (<b>a</b>) LAI = 5; (<b>b</b>) LAI = 4.5; (<b>c</b>) LAI = 4; (<b>d</b>); LAI = 3.5; (<b>e</b>) LAI = 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Difference analysis of canopy reflectance under different LAI. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) are the changes in canopy reflectance without a tassel; (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) are the differences in canopy reflectance caused by tassels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Polar plot of canopy reflectance for maize without tassel @695 nm and 775 nm, and the three sun positions considered. <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">θ</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> represents the zenith angle of the sun, (<b>a</b>,<b>d</b>) are 13:50; (<b>b</b>,<b>e</b>) are 15:20; (<b>c</b>,<b>f</b>) are 16:30. The black cross marker represents the sun’s position. The black dashed line is row direction (east-west).</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Polar representation of the reflectance difference distribution of the non-tassel canopy in the symmetrical direction of the principal plane at different sun positions. R represents the hemisphere where the red band is located, and N represents the hemisphere where the near-infrared band is located. <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">θ</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> represents the zenith angle of the sun, (<b>a</b>) is 13:50; (<b>b</b>) is 15:20; (<b>c</b>) is 16:30. The projection line of the principal plane of the sun is represented by a white solid line. The black dashed line is row direction (east-west).</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Directional distribution of the reflectance difference between the with and without tassel canopy. <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">θ</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> represents the zenith angle of the sun, (<b>a</b>,<b>d</b>) are 13:50; (<b>b</b>,<b>e</b>) are 15:20; (<b>c</b>,<b>f</b>) are 16:30. The black cross marker represents the sun’s position. The black dashed line is row direction (east-west).</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Comparison of the effects of leaf optical properties on the reflectance of the non-tassel canopy. (<b>a</b>) Comparison of Canopy Reflectance Change; (<b>b</b>) percentage reduction of canopy reflectance. In the figure, T represents the transmittance, and BR represents the back reflectance (Same as below).</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Comparison of the effects of the reflectance of NTAB-leaves on the reflectance of the non-tassel canopy. In the figure, FR represents the front reflectance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Comparison of the effects of tassels with transmittance on canopy reflectance.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 5072 KiB  
Technical Note
Reflection–Polarization Characteristics of Greenhouses Studied by Drone-Polarimetry Focusing on Polarized Light Pollution of Glass Surfaces
by Péter Takács, Adalbert Tibiássy, Balázs Bernáth, Viktor Gotthard and Gábor Horváth
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(14), 2568; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16142568 - 13 Jul 2024
Viewed by 831
Abstract
Drone-based imaging polarimetry is a valuable new tool for the remote sensing of the polarization characteristics of the Earth’s surface. After briefly reviewing two earlier drone-polarimetric studies, we present here the results of our drone-polarimetric campaigns, in which we measured the reflection–polarization patterns [...] Read more.
Drone-based imaging polarimetry is a valuable new tool for the remote sensing of the polarization characteristics of the Earth’s surface. After briefly reviewing two earlier drone-polarimetric studies, we present here the results of our drone-polarimetric campaigns, in which we measured the reflection–polarization patterns of greenhouses. From the measured patterns of the degree and angle of linear polarization of reflected light, we calculated the measure (plp) of polarized light pollution of glass surfaces. The knowledge of polarized light pollution is important for aquatic insect ecology, since polarotactic aquatic insects are the endangered victims of artificial horizontally polarized light sources. We found that the so-called Palm House of a botanical garden has only a low polarized light pollution, 3.6% ≤ plp ≤ 13.7%, while the greenhouses with tilted roofs are strongly polarized-light-polluting, with 24.8% ≤ plp ≤ 40.4%. Similarly, other tilted-roofed greenhouses contain very high polarized light pollution, plp ≤ 76.7%. Under overcast skies, the polarization patterns and plp values of greenhouses practically only depend on the direction of view relative to the glass surfaces, as the rotationally invariant diffuse cloud light is the only light source. However, under cloudless skies, the polarization patterns of glass surfaces significantly depend on the azimuth direction of view and its angle relative to the solar meridian because, in this case, sunlight is the dominant light source, rather than the sky. In the case of a given direction of view, those glass surfaces are the strongest polarized-light-polluting, from which sunlight and/or skylight is reflected at or near Brewster’s angle in a nearly vertical plane, i.e., with directions of polarization close to horizontal. Therefore, the plp value is usually greatest when the sun shines directly or from behind. The plp value of greenhouses is always the smallest in the green spectral range due to the green plants under the glass. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Drone Remote Sensing II)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Photograph (<b>A</b>), manually red-marked glass surfaces (<b>B</b>), patterns of the degree <span class="html-italic">d</span> of linear polarization (<b>C</b>) and polarization angle α measured clockwise from the vertical (<b>D</b>), polarized-light-polluting areas marked in blue (<b>E</b>), which an aquatic insect perceives as water if <span class="html-italic">d</span> &gt; 10% and 65° &lt; α &lt; 115° for the glass roof of the Palm House in the ELTE Botanical Garden. In the photograph (<b>A</b>), some particular glass panes are numbered (1.-7.). The polarization patterns were measured by imaging drone-polarimetry in the green (550 nm) spectral region, when the drone was at a height of <span class="html-italic">h</span> = 22 m, and the azimuth angle of the optical axis of its polarization camera was β = +180° clockwise from the solar meridian.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Similar to <a href="#remotesensing-16-02568-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>, but now in the case of the tilted-roofed greenhouses in the ELTE Botanical Garden, when (<b>A</b>–<b>E</b>) the drone was at a height of <span class="html-italic">h</span> = 20 m, and the azimuth angle of the optical axis of its polarization camera was β = +100° clockwise from the solar meridian, (<b>F</b>–<b>J</b>) <span class="html-italic">h</span> = 20 m, β = +75°, (<b>K</b>–<b>O</b>) <span class="html-italic">h</span> = 20 m, β = +15°. In the photographs (<b>A</b>, <b>F</b>, <b>K</b>), some particular glass panes and water surfaces are numbered.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Similar to <a href="#remotesensing-16-02568-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>, but now in the case of the greenhouses in Vácrátót, when (<b>A</b>–<b>E</b>) the drone was at a height of <span class="html-italic">h</span> = 30 m, and the azimuth angle of the optical axis of its polarization camera was β = −95° clockwise from the solar meridian, (<b>F</b>–<b>J</b>) <span class="html-italic">h</span> = 30 m, β = −95°, (<b>K</b>–<b>O</b>) <span class="html-italic">h</span> = 30 m, β = −20°, (<b>P</b>–<b>T</b>) <span class="html-italic">h</span> = 30 m, β = +5°.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Our drone-polarimeter with the new mounting mechanism for the polarization camera, to be used in future studies.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 7481 KiB  
Article
Solar Radiation Measurement Tools and Their Impact on In Situ Testing—A Portuguese Case Study
by Marta Oliveira, Hélder Silva Lopes, Paulo Mendonça, Martin Tenpierik and Lígia Torres Silva
Buildings 2024, 14(7), 2117; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14072117 - 10 Jul 2024
Viewed by 2112
Abstract
Accurate knowledge of solar radiation data or its estimation is crucial to maximize the benefits derived from the Sun. In this context, many sectors are re-evaluating their investments and plans to increase profit margins in line with sustainable development based on knowledge and [...] Read more.
Accurate knowledge of solar radiation data or its estimation is crucial to maximize the benefits derived from the Sun. In this context, many sectors are re-evaluating their investments and plans to increase profit margins in line with sustainable development based on knowledge and estimation of solar radiation. This scenario has drawn the attention of researchers to the estimation and measurement of solar radiation with a low level of error. Various types of models, such as empirical models, time series, artificial intelligence algorithms and hybrid models, for estimating and measuring solar radiation have been continuously developed in the literature. In general, these models require atmospheric, geographical, climatic and historical solar radiation data from a specific region for accurate estimation. Each analysis model has its advantages and disadvantages when it comes to estimating solar radiation and, depending on the model, the results for one region may be better or worse than for another. Furthermore, it has been observed that an input parameter that significantly improves the model’s performance in one region can make it difficult to succeed in another. The research gaps, challenges and future directions in terms of solar radiation estimation have substantial impacts, but regardless of the model, in situ measurements and commercially available equipment consistently influence solar radiation calculations and, subsequently, simulations or estimates. This article aims to exemplify, through a case study in a multi-family residential building located in Viana do Castelo, a city in the north of Portugal, the difficulties of capturing the spectrum of radiations that make up the total radiation that reaches the measuring equipment or site. Three pieces of equipment are used—a silicon pyranometer, a thermopile pyranometer and a solar meter—on the same day, in the same place, under the same meteorological conditions and with the same measurement method. It is found that the thermopile pyranometer has superior behavior, as it does not oscillate as much with external factors such as the ambient temperature, which influence the other two pieces of equipment. However, due to the different assumptions of the measurement models, the various components of the measurement site make it difficult to obtain the most accurate and reliable results in most studies. Despite the advantages of each model, measurement models have gained prominence in terms of the ease of use and low operating costs rather than the rigor of their results. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Building Energy, Physics, Environment, and Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The evolution of the global development framework for sustainable development.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Case study area in D. Maria II Street (Viana do Castelo). (<b>A</b>) European context; (<b>B</b>) Alto Minho NUTS III and Municipality of Viana do Castelo; and (<b>C</b>) location of study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>View of the area of the block chosen as the case study and the respective markings of the data collection points (PC).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Solar radiation measurements at four data collection points (<b>A</b>) PC1; (<b>B</b>) PC2; (<b>C</b>) PC3; (<b>D</b>) PC4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Relational comparison between the thermopile pyranometer and the other two sensors (silicon pyranometer and solar radiation meter). Blue dots represent the relationship between the values measured with the thermopile pyranometer and the solar radiation meter. Orange dots are the relationship between the thermopile pyranometer and the silicon pyranometer.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 5894 KiB  
Technical Note
Infrared Maritime Small-Target Detection Based on Fusion Gray Gradient Clutter Suppression
by Wei Wang, Zhengzhou Li and Abubakar Siddique
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(7), 1255; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16071255 - 2 Apr 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1290
Abstract
The long-distance ship target turns into a small spot in an infrared image, which has the characteristics of small size, weak intensity, limited texture information, and is easily affected by noise. Moreover, the presence of heavy sea clutter, including sun glints that exhibit [...] Read more.
The long-distance ship target turns into a small spot in an infrared image, which has the characteristics of small size, weak intensity, limited texture information, and is easily affected by noise. Moreover, the presence of heavy sea clutter, including sun glints that exhibit local contrast similar to small targets, negatively impacts the performance of small-target detection methods. To address these challenges, we propose an effective detection scheme called fusion gray gradient clutter suppression (FGGCS), which leverages the disparities in grayscale and gradient between the target and its surrounding background. Firstly, we designed a harmonic contrast map (HCM) by using the two-dimensional difference of Gaussian (2D-DoG) filter and eigenvalue harmonic mean of the structure tensor to highlight high-contrast regions of interest. Secondly, a local gradient difference measure (LGDM) is designed to distinguish isotropic small targets from background edges with local gradients in a specific direction. Subsequently, by integrating the HCM and LGDM, we designed a fusion gray gradient clutter suppression map (FGGCSM) to effectively enhance the target and suppress clutter from the sea background. Finally, an adaptive constant false alarm threshold is adopted to extract the targets. Extensive experiments on five real infrared maritime image sequences full of sea glints, including a small target and sea–sky background, show that FGGCS effectively increases the signal-to-clutter ratio gain (SCRG) and the background suppression factor (BSF) by more than 22% and 82%, respectively. Furthermore, its receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve has an obviously more rapid convergence rate than those of other typical detection algorithms and improves the accuracy of small-target detection in complex maritime backgrounds. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Remote Sensing Image Processing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The flowchart of the proposed algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Two-dimensional Gaussian spatial distribution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Target image patch. (<b>b</b>) Sea clutter edge image patch. (<b>c</b>) IGVF of target. (<b>d</b>) IGVF of sea clutter edge.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Gradient region partition map of target.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Template W1. (<b>b</b>) Template W2. (<b>c</b>) Template W3. (<b>d</b>) Template W4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The representative images: (<b>a</b>) 8th frame of Sequence 1. (<b>b</b>) 19th frame of Sequence 2. (<b>c</b>) 22th frame of Sequence 3. (<b>d</b>) 86th frame of Sequence 4. (<b>e</b>) 10th frame of Sequence 5.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The background suppression saliency map of <a href="#remotesensing-16-01255-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>a by different methods. (<b>a</b>) Max-median. (<b>b</b>) WTH. (<b>c</b>) MGDWIE. (<b>d</b>) IPI. (<b>e</b>) MPCM. (<b>f</b>) FGGCS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The background suppression saliency map of <a href="#remotesensing-16-01255-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>b by different methods. (<b>a</b>) Max-median. (<b>b</b>) WTH. (<b>c</b>) MGDWIE. (<b>d</b>) IPI. (<b>e</b>) MPCM. (<b>f</b>) FGGCS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The background suppression saliency map of <a href="#remotesensing-16-01255-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>c by different methods. (<b>a</b>) Max-median. (<b>b</b>) WTH. (<b>c</b>) MGDWIE. (<b>d</b>) IPI. (<b>e</b>) MPCM. (<b>f</b>) FGGCS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The background suppression saliency map of <a href="#remotesensing-16-01255-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>d by different methods. (<b>a</b>) Max-median. (<b>b</b>) WTH. (<b>c</b>) MGDWIE. (<b>d</b>) IPI. (<b>e</b>) MPCM. (<b>f</b>) FGGCS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The background suppression saliency map of <a href="#remotesensing-16-01255-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>e by different methods. (<b>a</b>) Max-median. (<b>b</b>) WTH. (<b>c</b>) MGDWIE. (<b>d</b>) IPI. (<b>e</b>) MPCM. (<b>f</b>) FGGCS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The ROC curves of different methods under five scenes with sea glint clutter. (<b>a</b>) Sequence 1. (<b>b</b>) Sequence 2. (<b>c</b>) Sequence 3. (<b>d</b>) Sequence 4. (<b>e</b>) Sequence 5.</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 2323 KiB  
Communication
Quantitation of the Surface Shortwave and Longwave Radiative Effect of Dust with an Integrated System: A Case Study at Xianghe
by Mengqi Liu, Hongrong Shi, Jingjing Song and Disong Fu
Sensors 2024, 24(2), 397; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24020397 - 9 Jan 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1026
Abstract
Aerosols play a crucial role in the surface radiative budget by absorbing and scattering both shortwave and longwave radiation. While most aerosol types exhibit a relatively minor longwave radiative forcing when compared to their shortwave counterparts, dust aerosols stand out for their substantial [...] Read more.
Aerosols play a crucial role in the surface radiative budget by absorbing and scattering both shortwave and longwave radiation. While most aerosol types exhibit a relatively minor longwave radiative forcing when compared to their shortwave counterparts, dust aerosols stand out for their substantial longwave radiative forcing. In this study, radiometers, a sun photometer, a microwave radiometer and the parameterization scheme for clear-sky radiation estimation were integrated to investigate the radiative properties of aerosols. During an event in Xianghe, North China Plain, from 25 April to 27 April 2018, both the composition (anthropogenic aerosol and dust) and the aerosol optical depth (AOD, ranging from 0.3 to 1.5) changed considerably. A notable shortwave aerosol radiative effect (SARE) was revealed by the integrated system (reaching its peak at −131.27 W·m−2 on 26 April 2018), which was primarily attributed to a reduction in direct irradiance caused by anthropogenic aerosols. The SARE became relatively consistent over the three days as the AODs approached similar levels. Conversely, the longwave aerosol radiative effect (LARE) on the dust days ranged from 8.94 to 32.93 W·m−2, significantly surpassing the values measured during the days of anthropogenic aerosol pollution, which ranged from 0.35 to 28.67 W·m−2, despite lower AOD values. The LARE increased with a higher AOD and a lower Ångström exponent (AE), with a lower AE having a more pronounced impact on the LARE than a higher AOD. It was estimated that, on a daily basis, the LARE will offset approximately 25% of the SARE during dust events and during periods of heavy anthropogenic pollution. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing Techniques for Atmospheric Pollutants Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Overview of the integrated system for the quantitation of the SARE and LARE of dust. AOD, AE, T, AH, e, GHI, DNI, DHI and DLR represent aerosol optical depth, Ångström exponent, screen-level temperature, absolute humidity, water vapor pressure, global horizontal irradiance, direct normal irradiance, diffuse horizontal irradiance, downward longwave radiation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Images of the NCP captured by MODIS on board the Terra satellite for (<b>a</b>) 25, (<b>b</b>) 26 and (<b>c</b>) 27 April 2018. The red circles identify the position of Xianghe.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Variation in AOD, AE, T, AH, GHI and DLR on 25–27 April 2018 at Xianghe.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Variation in (<b>a</b>) AOD, AE, (<b>b</b>) T, AH, (<b>c</b>) GHI and DLR during the clean and clear day of 5 May 2018 at Xianghe.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Intercomparison between the measured and the estimated (<b>a</b>) GHI and (<b>b</b>) DLR for a clean and clear day, i.e., 5 May 2018. The red dashed line is 1:1 line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Diurnal variations in (<b>a</b>) SARE and (<b>b</b>) LARE on 25–27 April 2018 at Xianghe.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) DNI and (<b>b</b>) DHI at different times on 25–27 April 2018 at Xianghe.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Scattering diagram of the LARE as a function of AOD and AE in the studied episode.</p>
Full article ">
35 pages, 4586 KiB  
Review
Plant Physiological Analysis to Overcome Limitations to Plant Phenotyping
by Matthew Haworth, Giovanni Marino, Giulia Atzori, Andre Fabbri, Andre Daccache, Dilek Killi, Andrea Carli, Vincenzo Montesano, Adriano Conte, Raffaella Balestrini and Mauro Centritto
Plants 2023, 12(23), 4015; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12234015 - 29 Nov 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3887
Abstract
Plant physiological status is the interaction between the plant genome and the prevailing growth conditions. Accurate characterization of plant physiology is, therefore, fundamental to effective plant phenotyping studies; particularly those focused on identifying traits associated with improved yield, lower input requirements, and climate [...] Read more.
Plant physiological status is the interaction between the plant genome and the prevailing growth conditions. Accurate characterization of plant physiology is, therefore, fundamental to effective plant phenotyping studies; particularly those focused on identifying traits associated with improved yield, lower input requirements, and climate resilience. Here, we outline the approaches used to assess plant physiology and how these techniques of direct empirical observations of processes such as photosynthetic CO2 assimilation, stomatal conductance, photosystem II electron transport, or the effectiveness of protective energy dissipation mechanisms are unsuited to high-throughput phenotyping applications. Novel optical sensors, remote/proximal sensing (multi- and hyperspectral reflectance, infrared thermography, sun-induced fluorescence), LiDAR, and automated analyses of below-ground development offer the possibility to infer plant physiological status and growth. However, there are limitations to such ‘indirect’ approaches to gauging plant physiology. These methodologies that are appropriate for the rapid high temporal screening of a number of crop varieties over a wide spatial scale do still require ‘calibration’ or ‘validation’ with direct empirical measurement of plant physiological status. The use of deep-learning and artificial intelligence approaches may enable the effective synthesis of large multivariate datasets to more accurately quantify physiological characters rapidly in high numbers of replicate plants. Advances in automated data collection and subsequent data processing represent an opportunity for plant phenotyping efforts to fully integrate fundamental physiological data into vital efforts to ensure food and agro-economic sustainability. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">P</span><sub>N</sub>–<span class="html-italic">C</span><sub>i</sub> response curve (<span class="html-italic">Olea europaea</span> L.) showing the stage of the curve limited by the rate of electron transport required for ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) regeneration (<span class="html-italic">J</span><sub>max</sub>), the part of the curve limited by the carboxylation capacity of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RubisCO) (<span class="html-italic">V</span>c<sub>max</sub>), and the maximum rate of photosynthesis at <span class="html-italic">PAR</span><sub>sat</sub> and high [CO<sub>2</sub>] (<span class="html-italic">P</span><sub>Nmax</sub>), grey circles indicate steady state measurements of photosynthetic gas exchange taken at each [CO<sub>2</sub>] level; (<b>b</b>) RACiR curves (red, yellow, and blue symbols) overlain with a traditional <span class="html-italic">P</span><sub>N</sub>–<span class="html-italic">C</span><sub>i</sub> steady state response curve (<span class="html-italic">Phragmites australis</span> (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud.); (<b>c</b>) example of an error during [CO<sub>2</sub>] ramping that can affect post-processing of a RACiR curve, and; (<b>d</b>) the results of the [CO<sub>2</sub>] ramping error outlined in (<b>c</b>) on the corrected RACiR curve (red symbols) of a <span class="html-italic">P. australis</span> leaf, alongside a RACiR error caused by the use of an excessively fast [CO<sub>2</sub>] ramping rate (yellow symbols).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) The light compensation point (PAR<sub>comp</sub>), maximum quantum efficiency of CO<sub>2</sub> assimilation (<math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mo>Φ</mo> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">C</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">O</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <mi mathvariant="normal">m</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">a</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">x</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>), and light-saturated rate of photosynthesis (<span class="html-italic">P</span><sub>N sat</sub>) from a light response curve of wheat (<span class="html-italic">Triticum aestivum</span> L.); (<b>b</b>) relationship between <span class="html-italic">P</span><sub>N</sub> measured using gas exchange and ΦPSII measured using ChlF of well-watered (white fill) and drought-stressed (grey fill) Moroccan (circle symbol), Sicilian (triangle symbol), and Tuscan (square symbol) ecotypes of <span class="html-italic">Arundo donax</span>, black central line indicates the regression best-fit, the two grey lines either side indicate 95% confidence intervals of the mean; (<b>c</b>) relationship between the actual quantum efficiency of PSII in the light-adapted state (ΦPSII) determined using ChlF and quantum efficiency determined using leaf gas exchange (<math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mo>Φ</mo> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">C</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">O</mi> </mrow> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>) of <span class="html-italic">A. donax</span> (symbols and statistical analysis as in (<b>b</b>), and; (<b>d</b>) the ratio of ΦPSII to <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mo>Φ</mo> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">C</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">O</mi> </mrow> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math> of the <span class="html-italic">A. donax</span> genotypes under well-watered (white fill) and drought-stressed (grey filled) conditions consistent with an increase in the proportion of energy utilized via photorespiration in the drought-stressed plants, letters indicate homogeneous groupings indicated by a one-way ANOVA with an LSD <span class="html-italic">post-hoc</span> test. Recalculated from Haworth et al. [<a href="#B109-plants-12-04015" class="html-bibr">109</a>] and Riggi et al. [<a href="#B72-plants-12-04015" class="html-bibr">72</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The relationship between SPAD values and leaf gas exchange values of photosynthesis (<b>a</b>) and chlorophyll fluorescence analysis of the actual quantum efficiency of photosystem II (ΦPSII) (<b>b</b>) of ginkgo (<span class="html-italic">Ginkgo biloba</span> L.) grown at 20/25 °C (white fill) and 30/35 °C (grey fill) [<a href="#B146-plants-12-04015" class="html-bibr">146</a>]—the solid black lines indicate linear regression, grey lines either side of linear regression indicate 95% confidence intervals of the regression line. The use of SPAD (<b>c</b>) and spectrophotometric quantification of chlorophyll content per dry weight of leaf (<b>d</b>) to phenotype the effect of well-watered (WW: open fill) and water deficit (WD: hashed fill) irrigation on drought-tolerant (white fill) and drought-sensitive (grey fill) sunflower (<span class="html-italic">Helianthus annuus</span> L.) [<a href="#B67-plants-12-04015" class="html-bibr">67</a>]. Error bars indicate one standard error either side of the mean. Letters indicate significant difference between groups in SPAD (lower case) and chlorophyll content per dry weight of leaf (upper case letters) values using a one-way ANOVA and LSD post hoc test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) UAV-mounted infrared thermography of cannabis (<span class="html-italic">Cannabis sativa</span> L.) receiving full (100% white fill) and water deficit (50% grey fill) irrigation. (<b>b</b>) Temperature measurement of the plots shown in panel a (one-way ANOVA: F<sub>1,22</sub> = 35.4; <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 5.4 × 10<sup>−6</sup>). (<b>c</b>) Stomatal conductance (<span class="html-italic">G</span><sub>s</sub>) of the plants measured using a LiCor Li600 porometer–fluorometer (Li-Cor, Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA) (one-way ANOVA: F<sub>1,22</sub> = 18.0; <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.0003).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Example of spectral reflectance of an olive leaf under well-watered (black line) and water deficit (grey line) conditions: (<b>a</b>) spectral reflectance of the leaf over the wavelengths 300–700 nm that mostly corresponds to visible and photosynthetically active radiation in the 400–700 nm band. Absorption spectra of chlorophyll a and b (data from [<a href="#B201-plants-12-04015" class="html-bibr">201</a>]). Horizontal dashed lines mark the wavelengths utilized for the photochemical reflectance index (PRI—<a href="#sec6dot1-plants-12-04015" class="html-sec">Section 6.1</a>) and PSII chlorophyll fluorescence (<a href="#sec3dot1-plants-12-04015" class="html-sec">Section 3.1</a>). (<b>b</b>) Spectral reflectance of the leaf over the wavelengths 300–2500 nm: writing in orange indicates the main factors affecting specific parts of the spectra; key wavelengths and parts of the spectra used to estimate specific parameters such as the water index (WI) or red-edge are marked on the figure [<a href="#B15-plants-12-04015" class="html-bibr">15</a>,<a href="#B196-plants-12-04015" class="html-bibr">196</a>,<a href="#B202-plants-12-04015" class="html-bibr">202</a>,<a href="#B203-plants-12-04015" class="html-bibr">203</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Example of linear regression correlations between spectral reflectance indices and physiological parameters of <span class="html-italic">Olea europea grown</span> under full (white fill) and deficit (grey fill) irrigation: (<b>a</b>) photosynthesis (<span class="html-italic">P</span><sub>N</sub>) versus photochemical reflectance index (PRI); (<b>b</b>) photosynthesis versus normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI); (<b>c</b>) leaf water potential (Ψ<sub>leaf</sub>) versus the water index (WI), and; (<b>d</b>) sap flux density versus the water index. Linear regression and confidence interval lines as in <a href="#plants-12-04015-f003" class="html-fig">Figure 3</a>. Re-drawn from Marino, et al. [<a href="#B157-plants-12-04015" class="html-bibr">157</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>LiDAR systems mounted on: (<b>a</b>) a mobile phenotyping station (Geoslam Zeb Horizon), and; (<b>b</b>) an unmanned aerial vehicle (Riegel mini Vux).</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 16243 KiB  
Article
The Use of Deep Learning Methods for Object Height Estimation in High Resolution Satellite Images
by Szymon Glinka, Jarosław Bajer, Damian Wierzbicki, Kinga Karwowska and Michal Kedzierski
Sensors 2023, 23(19), 8162; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23198162 - 29 Sep 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3162
Abstract
Processing single high-resolution satellite images may provide a lot of important information about the urban landscape or other applications related to the inventory of high-altitude objects. Unfortunately, the direct extraction of specific features from single satellite scenes can be difficult. However, the appropriate [...] Read more.
Processing single high-resolution satellite images may provide a lot of important information about the urban landscape or other applications related to the inventory of high-altitude objects. Unfortunately, the direct extraction of specific features from single satellite scenes can be difficult. However, the appropriate use of advanced processing methods based on deep learning algorithms allows us to obtain valuable information from these images. The height of buildings, for example, may be determined based on the extraction of shadows from an image and taking into account other metadata, e.g., the sun elevation angle and satellite azimuth angle. Classic methods of processing satellite imagery based on thresholding or simple segmentation are not sufficient because, in most cases, satellite scenes are not spectrally heterogenous. Therefore, the use of classical shadow detection methods is difficult. The authors of this article explore the possibility of using high-resolution optical satellite data to develop a universal algorithm for a fully automated estimation of object heights within the land cover by calculating the length of the shadow of each founded object. Finally, a set of algorithms allowing for a fully automatic detection of objects and shadows from satellite and aerial imagery and an iterative analysis of the relationships between them to calculate the heights of typical objects (such as buildings) and atypical objects (such as wind turbines) is proposed. The city of Warsaw (Poland) was used as the test area. LiDAR data were adopted as the reference measurement. As a result of final analyses based on measurements from several hundred thousand objects, the global accuracy obtained was ±4.66 m. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing for Spatial Information Extraction and Process)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The relationship between the length of the shadow (L′) of an object, elevation angle of the sun (Θ), and building base height (H) (Equation (1)).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>A sample image covering the analyzed area (Warsaw, Poland).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Methodology and pipeline schema.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Shadow length estimation—segmentation vector (green) versus ground vector (purple); light green color represents shadow. (<b>b</b>) Imagery fragment corresponding to (<b>a</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Example: (<b>a</b>) satellite imagery, (<b>b</b>) building mask prediction, (<b>c</b>) shadow map prediction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Building segmentation examples; (<b>a</b>) Example 1: green—building segmentation vector, (<b>b</b>) Example 2: pink—ground truth building vector.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Shadow segmentation examples; green—recognized shadows. (<b>a</b>) Shadow detection in tall buildings. (<b>b</b>) Shadow detection in low buildings (<b>c</b>) Example of false positives—the area of artificial turf on the sports field shown.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Joint visualization of buildings (red) and shadows (blue).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Height estimation process: (<b>a</b>) cutting lines (<b>b</b>) shadows (brown) and objects (red).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Visualization of shadow–building relationship. Green—shadows, orange—objects.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Visualization of differences between reference data and determined data. Green represents differences of 0–3 m, light green of 3–6 m, orange of 6–10 m, and red represents differences above 10 m. Additionally, detected shadows are marked in blue. The <b>top</b> image shows a larger view, while the bottom shows (<b>a</b>) an image with annotated height estimations differences, and (<b>b</b>) the distribution of differences.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>(<b>a</b>) Software interface to run and analyze the algorithm. (<b>b</b>) Obstacle visualization on map.</p>
Full article ">
5 pages, 1284 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
The Global and Diffuse Solar Radiation Trends Using GEBA & BSRN Ground Based Measurements during 1984–2018
by Michael Stamatis, Pavlos Ioannou, Marios-Bruno Korras-Carraca and Nikolaos Hatzianastassiou
Environ. Sci. Proc. 2023, 26(1), 141; https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2023026141 - 31 Aug 2023
Viewed by 684
Abstract
Surface solar radiation (SSR) is a crucial parameter for both the Earth’s climate and human activities, and it consists of two components: the direct beam from the sun and diffuse radiation, with the latter being scattered by atmospheric molecules, aerosols, or clouds. The [...] Read more.
Surface solar radiation (SSR) is a crucial parameter for both the Earth’s climate and human activities, and it consists of two components: the direct beam from the sun and diffuse radiation, with the latter being scattered by atmospheric molecules, aerosols, or clouds. The multidecadal variations of SSR, known as Global Dimming and Brightening (GDB), should also arise from a corresponding variability of either the direct or the diffuse radiation. Thus, the determination of the trends of both the direct and the diffuse radiation is important for showing the causes of GDB. In the present study, we estimate the trends of global and diffuse radiation on a global scale during the period 1984–2018, using worldwide reference ground-based measurements from the Global Energy Balance Archive (GEBA) and the Baseline Surface Radiation Network (BSRN). An increasing tendency of SSR is observed over most locations on our planet, while a decreasing trend occurs in India. On the other hand, the diffuse radiation has decreased over Europe and parts of Asia, whereas it has increased over the USA, India, and East Asia. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Global distribution of changes in (<b>a</b>) SSR and (<b>b</b>) diffuse radiation (in W/m<sup>2</sup>) during the years 1984–2018 at 64 globally distributed GEBA stations. Reddish and yellow colors indicate increasing trends, while bluish colors indicate decreasing trends. The statistical significance of each trend is denoted by embedded “x” symbols.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The global distribution of changes in (<b>a</b>) SSR and (<b>b</b>) diffuse radiation (in W/m<sup>2</sup>) during the years 1992–2018 at 23 globally distributed BSRN stations. Reddish and yellow colors indicate increasing trends, while bluish colors indicate decreasing trends. The statistical significance of each trend is denoted by embedded “x” symbols.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 7586 KiB  
Article
Analysis and Compensation of Sun Direction Error on Solar Disk Velocity Difference
by Mingzhen Gui, Hua Yang, Dangjun Zhao, Mingzhe Dai and Chengxi Zhang
Mathematics 2023, 11(17), 3716; https://doi.org/10.3390/math11173716 - 29 Aug 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 940
Abstract
Solar disk velocity difference is an emerging celestial navigation measurement acquired through four spectrometers positioned on the four corners of the quadrangular pyramid. The alignment of the pyramid’s axis with the direction from the sun to the spacecraft is crucial. However, the sun [...] Read more.
Solar disk velocity difference is an emerging celestial navigation measurement acquired through four spectrometers positioned on the four corners of the quadrangular pyramid. The alignment of the pyramid’s axis with the direction from the sun to the spacecraft is crucial. However, the sun sensor measurement error inevitably leads to the sun direction error, which both significantly affect navigation accuracy. To address this issue, this article proposes an augmented state sun direction/solar disk velocity difference integrated navigation method. By analyzing the impact of the sun direction error on sun direction and solar disk velocity difference measurements, the errors of the solar elevation and azimuth angle are extended to the state vector. The navigation method establishes state and measurement models that consider these errors. Simulation results show that the position error and velocity error of the proposed method are reduced by 97.51% and 96.91% compared with those of the integrated navigation with the sun direction error, respectively. The result demonstrates that the proposed method effectively mitigates the impact of sun direction error on navigation performance. In addition, the proposed method can maintain a satisfactory error suppression effect under different sun direction error values. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The spectrometer array [<a href="#B25-mathematics-11-03716" class="html-bibr">25</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The diagram of the solar disks obtained with and without sun direction error.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Integrated navigation without sun direction error. (<b>a</b>) Position error. (<b>b</b>) Velocity error.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Integrated navigation with sun direction error. (<b>a</b>) Position error. (<b>b</b>) Velocity error.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Augmented state integrated navigation. (<b>a</b>) Position error. (<b>b</b>) Velocity error.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Estimated result of sun direction error. (<b>a</b>) Solar elevation angle error. (<b>b</b>) Solar azimuth angle error.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Navigation accuracy for various sample time. (<b>a</b>) Position error. (<b>b</b>) Velocity error.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Navigation accuracy under different number of spectrometers. (<b>a</b>) Position error. (<b>b</b>) Velocity error.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Navigation accuracy under different sun direction errors. (<b>a</b>) Position error. (<b>b</b>) Velocity error.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 1191 KiB  
Article
The 48-Year Data Analysis Collected by Nagoya Muon Telescope—A Detection of Possible (125 ± 45) Day Periodicity
by Yasushi Muraki, Shoichi Shibata, Hisanori Takamaru and Akitoshi Oshima
Universe 2023, 9(9), 387; https://doi.org/10.3390/universe9090387 - 28 Aug 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1278
Abstract
Muons produced by cosmic rays above the atmosphere provide valuable information on the intensity of cosmic rays and variations in the upper atmosphere. Since 1970, the Nagoya University Cosmic Ray Laboratory has been observing the muon intensity using a multi-directional cosmic ray telescope [...] Read more.
Muons produced by cosmic rays above the atmosphere provide valuable information on the intensity of cosmic rays and variations in the upper atmosphere. Since 1970, the Nagoya University Cosmic Ray Laboratory has been observing the muon intensity using a multi-directional cosmic ray telescope with two layers of 36 plastic scintillators of 1m2 each, which measure the muon intensity in different incident directions. The energy of an incident proton that produces a muon incident from a vertical direction is over 11.5 GV. This paper analyzes vertical muon intensities obtained over 48 years from 1970 to 2018 using methods that differ from the East–West method. As a result, a new periodicity of (125±45) days and a new periodicity of (4–16) days were found. The latter appears only in winter time, so it may be caused by a synoptic-scale disturbance associated with the arrival of the Siberian cold air mass. On the other hand, the former periodicity may be related to solar dynamo activity. In 1984, the Solar Maximum Mission’s Gamma Ray Spectrometers reported a periodicity of about (154±10) days in the flux of solar gamma rays. The (125±45)-day periodicity found here is most likely related to solar dynamo activity, since the intensity of cosmic rays around 11.5 GV is affected by the magnetic field induced by the Sun. However, this (125±45)-day periodicity differs from the report measured by the GRS instrument in a point that it also appears during periods of low solar activity. Furthermore, it has not appeared often during lower solar activity since 1992. This information is important for future investigation of the origin of this periodicity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Impulsive Solar Flares and Particle Acceleration)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The data of Nagoya vertical muon. The vertical axis represents the counting rate in units of 0.01%/hour and the horizontal axis shows the time since January 1st of 2008, 00:00 UT. The upper blue curve is the Nagoya muon vertical intensity recoded during 2008–2018. And the curve fitted by using the equation explained in the text (red curve) is shown superimposed on the raw data. The difference between the raw data and the fitting curve are shown at the bottom (black curve). The seasonal variation by the temperature effect seems to be removed. The Forbush Decrease can be seen around 36,000 and 64,000 h. We do not remove these events because the effect is negligible.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The GLE event observed on 29 September 1989. The vertical axis represents the counting rate in units of 0.01%/hour and the horizontal axis represents hours. The peak time 6516 corresponds to 13–14 UT. The excess at this time, ∼900, is converted into actual counting rate by (900–100) × 0.01%/hour = 8%/hour. The average counting rate per hour is provided by <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mn>2.76</mn> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <mo>×</mo> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <msup> <mn>10</mn> <mn>6</mn> </msup> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <mo>×</mo> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mn>8</mn> <mo>/</mo> <mn>100</mn> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2.208</mn> <mo>×</mo> <msup> <mn>10</mn> <mn>5</mn> </msup> <mo>/</mo> <mi>hour</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Comparison of the present GLE (red curve) with other GLEs. The GLE on 29 September 1989 had quite a hard energy spectrum. This figure was originally prepared by Sakakibara for internal use of the cosmic ray group of Japan, but is not yet published.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The Matlab plot shows the results of the Morlet wavelet analysis from October 1970 to December 2018 (total duration). The vertical and abscissa are presented by the unit of day. Along the line of vertical value of day (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mn>125</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>45</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>), several spots are appeared. We confirmed that the enhancements around day (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mn>125</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>45</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>) have the statistical significance over 5 <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>σ</mi> </semantics></math>. The number 16 in the color bar corresponds to around 3 <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>σ</mi> </semantics></math> excess.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The result of the analysis baesd on the Morlet wavelet or one year data of 2018. We can recognize a clear periodicity along the horizontally line with 24 h periodicity. Furthermore, along the horizontal line from January to April with 120 h, an interesting periodicity can be recognized. They are produced by the synoptic scale disturbances by Siberian cold wind. The strong periodicity around 648 h is induced by the 27-day priodicty owing to the solar rotation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The 10.7 cm solar radio wave from 14 October 1970 to 30 April 2018.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Matlab plot for the 10.7 cm solar radio wave. The Morlet wavelet function was applied to the data. The 27-day periodicity appeared during the solar maximum time and one excess point around day (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mn>125</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>45</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>) can be recognized at 3900 days from October 1970. The time corresponds to the dominant 154-day periodicity observation by GRS on broad SMM and H-alpha observation of solar surface.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The results of the wavelet analysis for Oulu neutron monitor data during October 1970 and December 2018. The Morlet wavelet function was used. Two peaks are recognized around 64 days on June 1991 (at 7600 days) and October 2003 (at 12,000 days).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The variation in the altitude at 100 hPa point over Wajima from January 2016 to June 2019. Vertical axis is represented by the unit of meters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The results of the wavelet analysis for the data at 100 hPa over Wajima based on the Morlet wavelet function for the data from January 2016 to June 2019. The variation appears during the winter time regularly with the period of (4∼16) days.</p>
Full article ">
6 pages, 1437 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Retrieval of Total NO2 Columns Using Direct-Sun Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy Measurements in Thessaloniki
by Dimitrios Nikolis, Dimitris Karagkiozidis and Alkiviadis F. Bais
Environ. Sci. Proc. 2023, 26(1), 51; https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2023026051 - 25 Aug 2023
Viewed by 707
Abstract
The monitoring of trace gases in the troposphere has been routinely performed at the Laboratory of Atmospheric Physics, Thessaloniki, Greece, for a decade now, by multiple Multi-Axis Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS) instruments. Even though measurements of trace gas concentrations in the troposphere [...] Read more.
The monitoring of trace gases in the troposphere has been routinely performed at the Laboratory of Atmospheric Physics, Thessaloniki, Greece, for a decade now, by multiple Multi-Axis Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS) instruments. Even though measurements of trace gas concentrations in the troposphere are of great interest in terms of air quality, the MAX-DOAS technique is only sensitive to absorbers in the lowest few kilometers of the atmosphere. In this work, we present a methodology for the retrieval of total NO2 columns in the atmosphere by applying the DOAS technique on direct sun spectra (DS-DOAS) measured with a new research-grade system. The advantages and limitations of the total NO2 retrieval methodology, based on DS-DOAS, are discussed. The accuracy and the quality of the retrieved columns were assessed by comparison with a collocated Pandora system that also measures total NO2 column amounts using a similar technique with independent calibration. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Histogram of RMSE of NO<sub>2</sub> relative slant columns measured by Delta and analyzed through QDOAS 3.2 software.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Relative NO<sub>2</sub> slant columns SC<sub>REL</sub> as a function of AMFs for Delta. The green dots are the 2nd percentile minima of each of the 5 AMF bins and the red line is the respective linear regression.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The comparison between absolute total VCDs from Delta and Pandora systems.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The total NO<sub>2</sub> VCDs differences between the Delta and the Pandora systems (in Pmolec/cm<sup>2</sup>).</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop