[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (210)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = ascidian

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 6712 KiB  
Article
Nanoplastic-Induced Developmental Toxicity in Ascidians: Comparative Analysis of Chorionated and Dechorionated Phallusia mammillata Embryos
by Maria Concetta Eliso, Ilaria Corsi, Antonietta Spagnuolo and Rémi Dumollard
J. Xenobiot. 2025, 15(1), 10; https://doi.org/10.3390/jox15010010 - 10 Jan 2025
Viewed by 557
Abstract
Nanoplastics pose a growing threat to marine ecosystems, particularly affecting the early developmental stages of marine organisms. This study investigates the effects of amino-modified polystyrene nanoparticles (PS-NH2, 50 nm) on the embryonic development of Phallusia mammillata, a model ascidian species. [...] Read more.
Nanoplastics pose a growing threat to marine ecosystems, particularly affecting the early developmental stages of marine organisms. This study investigates the effects of amino-modified polystyrene nanoparticles (PS-NH2, 50 nm) on the embryonic development of Phallusia mammillata, a model ascidian species. Both chorionated and dechorionated embryos were exposed to increasing concentrations of PS-NH2 so morphological alterations could be assessed with a high-content analysis of the phenotypes and genotoxicity. PS-NH2 induced the same morphological alterations in both chorionated and dechorionated embryos, with dechorionated embryos being more sensitive (EC50 = 3.0 μg mL−1) than chorionated ones (EC50 = 6.26 μg mL−1). Interestingly, results from the morphological analysis showed two concentration-dependent mechanisms of action: (i) at concentrations near the EC50, neurodevelopmental abnormalities resembling the ones induced by exposure to known endocrine disruptors (EDs) were observed, and (ii) at higher concentrations (15 μg mL−1 and 7.5 μg mL−1 for chorionated and dechorionated embryos, respectively), a nonspecific toxicity was evident, likely due to general oxidative stress. The phenotypes resulting from the PS-NH2 treatment were not related to DNA damage, as revealed by a genotoxicity assay performed on neurula embryos. Our data suggest that PS-NH2-induced toxicity is primarily mediated through oxidative stress, probably triggered by interactions between the positive charges of the PS NPs and the negative charges on the cell membranes. The lack of a protective chorion further exacerbated these effects, highlighting its role in mitigating/protecting against NP-induced damage. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Ecotoxicology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Percentage (%) of normal hatched larvae of <span class="html-italic">P. mammillata</span> upon 22 h exposure of chorionated embryos (<b>A</b>) and dechorionated embryos (<b>B</b>) to PS-NH<sub>2</sub> in NSW. Bars represent mean ± SD (PS-NH<sub>2</sub> N = 240). Asterisks indicate values that are significantly different compared to the control (Kruskal–Wallis test, Dunn’s post hoc test (* <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01, *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001)). EC<sub>50</sub> values are shown.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Light microscopy images of <span class="html-italic">P. mammillata</span> embryos exposed for 22 h to PS-NH<sub>2</sub>. (<b>A</b>–<b>E</b>) represent the phenotypes for embryos developed in a chorion: (<b>A</b>) control; (<b>B</b>) 5 μg mL<sup>−1</sup>; (<b>C</b>) 7.5 μg mL<sup>−1</sup>; (<b>D</b>) 10 μg mL<sup>−1</sup>; (<b>E</b>) 15 μg mL<sup>−1</sup>. White and red arrows represent a good and wrong shape of pigmented cells (PCs) and palps (P), respectively. Scale bar: 100 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Light microscopy images of <span class="html-italic">P. mammillata</span> embryos exposed for 22 h to PS-NH<sub>2</sub>. (<b>A</b>–<b>E</b>) represent the phenotypes for embryos developed without a chorion: (<b>A</b>) control; (<b>B</b>) 2 μg mL<sup>−1</sup>; (<b>C</b>) 3 μg mL<sup>−1</sup>; (<b>D</b>) 3.5 μg mL<sup>−1</sup>; (<b>E</b>) 5 μg mL<sup>−1</sup>; (<b>F</b>) 7.5 μg mL<sup>−1</sup>. White and red arrows represent a good and wrong shape of pigmented cells (PCs) and palps (P), respectively. Scale bar: 100 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Morphometric analysis of phenotypes induced in <span class="html-italic">P. mammillata</span> embryos (<b>A</b>) with a chorion and (<b>B</b>) without a chorion exposed to PS-NH<sub>2</sub> (0; 7.5 and 15 μg mL<sup>−1</sup> for chorionated embryos, 0; 3.5 and 7.5 μg mL<sup>−1</sup> for dechorionated embryos). The radar charts summarize the following endpoints: ocellus (Oc) + otolith (Ot) area (µm<sup>2</sup>); Oc/Ot distance (µm); percentage of embryos with palps (%); trunk L/W (length/width) ratio; tail length (µm). All measurements were performed at 22 hpf. The values are normalized to the corresponding value of the same parameter in the control (stage 26) and presented as a percentage of the control value. Complete radar charts of all tested concentrations are shown in <a href="#app1-jox-15-00010" class="html-app">Figure S3</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Genotoxicity assay performed analyzing 7 hpf embryos (neurula stage). (<b>A</b>) Control embryo (NSW), (<b>B</b>) 5 μg mL<sup>−1</sup>; (<b>C</b>) 7.5 μg mL<sup>−1</sup>. At the bottom of each image, the percentage of embryos not showing DNA aberrations is reported (N control = 152; 5 μg mL<sup>−1</sup> = 175; 7.5 μg mL<sup>−1</sup> = 160.).</p>
Full article ">
28 pages, 8919 KiB  
Article
Fine-Tuned Expression of Evolutionarily Conserved Signaling Molecules in the Ciona Notochord
by Lenny J. Negrón-Piñeiro, Yushi Wu, Ravij Mehta, Julie E. Maguire, Cindy Chou, Joyce Lee, Chitra L. Dahia and Anna Di Gregorio
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(24), 13631; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252413631 - 20 Dec 2024
Viewed by 651
Abstract
The notochord is an axial structure required for the development of all chordate embryos, from sea squirts to humans. Over the course of more than half a billion years of chordate evolution, in addition to its structural function, the notochord has acquired increasingly [...] Read more.
The notochord is an axial structure required for the development of all chordate embryos, from sea squirts to humans. Over the course of more than half a billion years of chordate evolution, in addition to its structural function, the notochord has acquired increasingly relevant patterning roles for its surrounding tissues. This process has involved the co-option of signaling pathways and the acquisition of novel molecular mechanisms responsible for the precise timing and modalities of their deployment. To reconstruct this evolutionary route, we surveyed the expression of signaling molecules in the notochord of the tunicate Ciona, an experimentally amenable and informative chordate. We found that several genes encoding for candidate components of diverse signaling pathways are expressed during notochord development, and in some instances, display distinctive regionalized and/or lineage-specific patterns. We identified and deconstructed notochord enhancers associated with TGF-β and Ctgf, two evolutionarily conserved signaling genes that are expressed dishomogeneously in the Ciona notochord, and shed light on the cis-regulatory origins of their peculiar expression patterns. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ascidian Early Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Reconstruction of the Rac1 interactome in the <span class="html-italic">Ciona</span> notochord. (<b>A</b>) Drawings of <span class="html-italic">Ciona robusta</span> embryos at the initial tailbud (<b>left</b>) and late tailbud (<b>right</b>). In the initial tailbud, only the notochord cells are colored (red). In the late tailbud, also the CNS (sensory vesicle and nerve cord), epidermis, and endoderm (trunk endoderm and endodermal strand) are colored (blue, green, and yellow, respectively), while tail muscles and mesenchyme, which fall onto different focal planes, are not depicted. Abbreviations: A, anterior; P, posterior. (<b>B</b>–<b>J</b>) Whole-mount <span class="html-italic">C. robusta</span> embryos at the initial tailbud stage (<b>B</b>–<b>G</b>,<b>J</b>; dorsal view) and mid-tailbud II (<b>H</b>,<b>I</b>; side view), hybridized in situ with digoxigenin-labeled antisense RNA probes. Gene names are reported on top of each panel; gene models on the bottom right corners; on the left corners, the ESTs used to synthesize each antisense probe are reported. Insets in (<b>B</b>–<b>F</b>,<b>J</b>) display embryos at tailbud stages subsequent to those in the main panels; inset in (<b>H</b>) shows an embryo at the late gastrula stage; inset in (<b>I</b>) shows an embryo at the late neurula stage. In all panels, anterior is to the left. Arrowheads color code: red, notochord; pink, faint notochord signal; white, unstained notochord; blue, CNS; violet, mesenchyme; yellow, endoderm. Scale bar: 50 μm. (<b>K</b>) Graph of the normalized read counts from the notochord of E12.5 mouse embryos (E12.5) and from NP cells at post-natal day zero (P0) from the published bulk RNA-seq dataset (GSE100934; [<a href="#B56-ijms-25-13631" class="html-bibr">56</a>]). (<b>L</b>) Graph of the normalized chip signals plotted as gene expression measures from microarray dataset E-MTAB-6868, obtained from human embryonic notochord cells at 7.5–8.5 weeks post-conception (WPC) and fetal NP cells at 12–14 WPC. (<b>M</b>,<b>N</b>) STRING protein–protein interaction (PPI) analysis, performed using the <span class="html-italic">Homo sapiens</span> genes in (<b>L</b>) as a reference. Colored circles represent network nodes (proteins); edges represent protein–protein associations, which are not necessarily physical interactions. The sources of the interactions are color coded as follows: blue, interactions derived from a database; fuchsia, experimentally determined interactions; green, text-mining; violet, co-expression; lilac, protein homology. (<b>M</b>) PPI-network. (<b>N</b>) Unsupervised MCL-clustering identification of four natural clusters (colored in red, yellow, blue, and green) among the nine nodes, based on stochastic flow. Nodes that are part of each cluster are annotated with the same color. Dashed lines indicate inter-cluster edges.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Evolutionarily conserved signaling molecules and their presumptive functions in the <span class="html-italic">Ciona</span> notochord. (<b>A</b>–<b>K</b>) Whole-mount <span class="html-italic">C. robusta</span> embryos at stages approximately ranging from late neurula/initial tailbud to late tailbud I [<a href="#B47-ijms-25-13631" class="html-bibr">47</a>], hybridized in situ with digoxigenin-labeled antisense RNA probes. Gene names are reported on top of each panel, gene models in the bottom right corners; on the left corner of each panel are reported the ESTs used to synthesize each antisense probe. Insets in (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>,<b>G</b>,<b>H</b>,<b>J</b>) display embryos at developmental stages subsequent to those displayed in the main panels; inset in (<b>B</b>) shows an optical section of the tail of an older embryo from the same experiment, with the notochord in the center; insets in (<b>D</b>,<b>E</b>,<b>G</b>,<b>K</b>) show embryos at earlier stages compared to those in the respective main panels. Arrowheads color code: red, notochord; pink, faint notochord signal; white, unstained notochord; blue, CNS; violet, mesenchyme; yellow, endoderm; green, epidermis. (<b>L</b>) Graph of the normalized read counts from the notochord of E12.5 mouse embryos (E12.5) and from NP cells at post-natal day zero (P0) from the published bulk RNA-seq dataset (GSE100934; [<a href="#B56-ijms-25-13631" class="html-bibr">56</a>]). (<b>M</b>) Graph of the normalized chip signals plotted as gene expression measures from microarray dataset E-MTAB-6868 [<a href="#B63-ijms-25-13631" class="html-bibr">63</a>], obtained from human embryonic notochord cells at 7.5–8.5 weeks post-conception (WPC) and fetal NP cells at 12–14 WPC. Bottom panel: summary of the presumptive functions of 17 of the genes identified in this study, inferred from studies carried out in other organisms (individually cited in the main text).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Signaling molecules heterogeneously expressed in the <span class="html-italic">Ciona</span> notochord. (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>,<b>E</b>,<b>H</b>,<b>J</b>,<b>L</b>) Drawings of <span class="html-italic">Ciona</span> embryos at the 110-cell stage (<b>A</b>) and at the late tailbud stage (<b>B</b>,<b>E</b>,<b>H</b>,<b>J</b>,<b>L</b>), illustrating (<b>A</b>) the A- and B-lineage notochord precursors and (<b>B</b>) their daughter cells, which form the primary and secondary notochord, respectively, and the diverse expression patterns that have been observed and/or previously reported for notochord genes (<b>E</b>,<b>H</b>,<b>J</b>,<b>L</b>). (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>) <span class="html-italic">Inpp5b</span> and <span class="html-italic">Hpcal4</span> are expressed predominantly in the primary notochord and appear excluded from the secondary notochord (<b>E</b>); inset in (<b>C</b>) shows the tip of the tail of a different embryo, which, in addition to the image in the main panel, further illustrates the difference in hybridization signal between the primary and secondary notochord. In (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>), the boundary between these two groups of notochord cells is approximately delineated by a red dashed line. (<b>F</b>,<b>G</b>) <span class="html-italic">Lzts2</span> and <span class="html-italic">Wee1</span> display gradated anterior–posterior expression, similarly to <span class="html-italic">TGF-β</span> [<a href="#B32-ijms-25-13631" class="html-bibr">32</a>] (<b>H</b>). Insets in (<b>F</b>,<b>G</b>) show embryos at earlier developmental stages. (<b>I</b>,<b>I’</b>) <span class="html-italic">Ptpra</span> is expressed mosaically in a lineage-independent fashion, both at early (<b>I</b>) and late (<b>I’</b>) developmental stages, similarly to <span class="html-italic">multidom</span> [<a href="#B31-ijms-25-13631" class="html-bibr">31</a>]. (<b>J</b>). Inset in (<b>I</b>) shows a close-up of the region boxed in black in the main panel; inset in (<b>I’</b>) shows a late tailbud. (<b>K</b>,<b>K’</b>) <span class="html-italic">Ywhag</span> is expressed exclusively at the anterior and posterior tips of the notochord at early (<b>K</b>) and late (<b>K’</b>,<b>L</b>) stages. Gene models and ESTs are reported in <a href="#ijms-25-13631-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a> and <a href="#ijms-25-13631-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a> and in <a href="#app1-ijms-25-13631" class="html-app">Table S1</a>. Arrowheads color code: red, notochord staining; pink, weak notochord staining; white, absence of notochord staining.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Identification and functional characterization of the <span class="html-italic">Cr-TGF-β</span> notochord CRM. Identification of the putative TF binding sites necessary for the transcriptional activity of the <span class="html-italic">Cr-TGF-β</span> notochord enhancer, achieved through sequence-unbiased truncations and site-directed mutations. (<b>A</b>) Schematic representation of the location of the <span class="html-italic">Cr-TGF-β</span> notochord enhancer region (red horizontal bar), which maps within intron 3 and encompasses ATAC-Seq peak 3846 (orange oval) [<a href="#B78-ijms-25-13631" class="html-bibr">78</a>]. Grey ovals symbolize ATAC-Seq peaks that were inactive when tested in vivo; white ovals represent ATAC-Seq peaks that were not tested. The “-” signs indicate a complete absence of notochord activity. Putative Ci-Bra binding sites are depicted as yellow vertical bars, numbered as B1 and B2; small arrows on top of each bar indicate the orientation of each binding site. (<b>B</b>) Motif–motif similarities between the functional Ci-Bra binding site in the <span class="html-italic">Cr-TGF-β</span> notochord CRM and the human BRA/TBXT consensus sequence identified by SELEX assays. Sequence comparison analysis was performed using Tomtom software Version 5.5.7 and the databases JASPAR Vertebrates (Version 2024) and Uniprobe [<a href="#B79-ijms-25-13631" class="html-bibr">79</a>]. (<b>C</b>) Quantification of notochord activity in embryos electroporated with constructs containing single mutations in the Ci-Bra binding sites, (B1) and (B2), as detected by X-Gal staining. The total number of X-Gal-stained embryos (<span class="html-italic">n</span>) analyzed per experiment is reported underneath the <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis. Data represent 25th to 75th percentiles (bounds of box), median (center line) ± min to max (whiskers); asterisk indicates <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; ns, non-significant; two-sided Student’s <span class="html-italic">t</span> test (<span class="html-italic">n</span> ≥ 3 biologically independent samples per category). (<b>D</b>–<b>G</b>) Low-magnification group photomicrographs of mid-tailbud embryos electroporated in parallel with either the 1.38 kb <span class="html-italic">Cr-TGF-β</span> notochord CRM (<b>D</b>), the 127 bp CRM (<b>E</b>), or with constructs carrying single mutations (<b>F</b>,<b>G</b>) in the Ci-Bra binding sites, respectively. Mutated sequences are in lower case and colored in red. The mutations were as follows: B1 Mt: GTGTCA to tctTCA; B2 Mt: GTGCAA to tctCAA. Insets show higher magnification photomicrographs of representative embryos stained by X-Gal; arrowheads indicate the embryonic tissues stained by each construct: red, notochord; purple, mesenchyme; green, epidermis. Scale bars: 200 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Regionalized activity of the <span class="html-italic">Cr-TGF-β</span> notochord CRM. To quantify the frequency of embryos with primary, secondary, or primary/secondary notochord staining, <span class="html-italic">Ciona</span> zygotes were electroporated with 75 µg of the 1.38 kb <span class="html-italic">TGF-β</span> notochord enhancer region (<a href="#ijms-25-13631-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a>A). After electroporation, embryos were cultured during the day at 21.5 °C and fixed for ~8 hrs after fertilization. X-Gal staining was carried out at 37 °C for ~20 h In a representative experiment, of the total embryos analyzed (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 206), 73 embryos displayed notochord staining (35.4%). Of the 73 embryos with notochord staining, 19 showed only primary notochord staining (26%), 51 showed only secondary notochord staining (~70%), and only 3 displayed staining in both the primary and secondary notochord (~4%). (<b>A</b>) Low-magnification photomicrograph of a group of <span class="html-italic">Ciona</span> embryos showing staining only in the secondary notochord, selected from different replicates of the experiment described above. (<b>B</b>) Low-magnification photomicrograph of a group of <span class="html-italic">Ciona</span> embryos showing staining in both the primary and secondary notochord, selected from different replicates of the experiment described above. (<b>A’</b>,<b>A”</b>) Higher magnification views of embryos with staining in the secondary notochord. (<b>B’</b>,<b>B”</b>) Higher magnification views of embryos with staining in both the primary and secondary notochord. Arrowheads color code: notochord (red), mesenchyme (purple), epidermis (green). Scale bars: 200 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Identification and functional characterization of the <span class="html-italic">Cr-Ctgf</span> notochord CRM. Identification of the minimal sequences necessary for the transcriptional activity of the <span class="html-italic">Cr-Ctgf</span> notochord enhancer in reporter assays, through sequence-unbiased truncations and site-directed mutations. (<b>A</b>) Schematic representation of the location of the <span class="html-italic">Cr-Ctgf</span> notochord enhancer (red horizontal bar), which lies within intron 1 and encompasses ATAC-Seq peaks 6980 and 4029 (ovals) [<a href="#B78-ijms-25-13631" class="html-bibr">78</a>]. The ATAC-Seq peak 6980 (orange oval) is included in the notochord enhancer; tested ATAC-Seq peaks with no activity are depicted as gray-colored ovals; a white oval denotes an untested ATAC-Seq peak. The “+” and “−” signs are used to show the presence or absence of notochord activity, respectively. Putative TF binding sites are symbolized by geometric shapes of different colors; small arrows on top of each bar indicate the orientation of each binding site. Mutated sequences are in lower case and colored in red. The mutations were as follows: HD Mt: TAAT to TccT; Hnf1a Mt: GATCAAA to ttaCAAA; Myb Mt: TAAC to gcAC. (<b>B</b>) Motif–motif similarities between the functional Ci-Bra binding site in the <span class="html-italic">Cr-Ctgf</span> notochord CRM and the human MYBL1 consensus sequence identified by SELEX assays. Sequence comparison was performed as described in Fig. 4. (<b>C</b>) Quantification of the results of the truncation/mutation analysis of the <span class="html-italic">Cr-Ctgf</span> notochord CRM, determined by X-Gal staining. The total number of X-Gal-stained embryos (<span class="html-italic">n</span>) analyzed per experiment is reported underneath the <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis. Data represent 25th to 75th percentiles (bounds of box), median (center line) ± min to max (whiskers); * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01, *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001, **** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0001, ns, non-significant; two-sided Student’s <span class="html-italic">t</span> test (n ≥ 3 independent samples per category). The intensity of the notochord staining elicited by each truncation and mutation is reported using different shades of red and pink, with red indicating full intensity and lighter red/pink indicating faint notochord staining.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>In vivo activity of different truncated and mutant versions of the <span class="html-italic">Cr-Ctgf</span> notochord enhancer region. (<b>A</b>–<b>N</b>) Low-magnification group photomicrographs of mid-tailbud embryos electroporated in parallel with the transgenes indicated in the lower left corner of each panel and stained with X-Gal. Insets in (<b>A</b>–<b>N</b>) show high-magnification photomicrographs of the representative embryos from each experiment. Arrowheads color code: red, notochord; purple, mesenchyme; orange, muscle. Scale bars: 200 μm.</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 739 KiB  
Article
Single but Not Combined In Vitro Exposure to Bisphenol A and Nanoplastics Affects the Cholinergic Function of the Ascidian Ciona robusta
by Safa Melki, Emma Ferrari, Raja Ben Ahmed, Antonietta Spagnuolo and Ilaria Corsi
J. Xenobiot. 2024, 14(4), 1930-1940; https://doi.org/10.3390/jox14040103 - 5 Dec 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 762
Abstract
Nanoplastics are known to represent a threat to marine ecosystems. Their combination with other contaminants of emerging concerns (CECs) may amplify ecotoxic effects, with unknown impacts on marine biodiversity. This study investigates the effects, single and combined, of bisphenol A (BPA)—one of the [...] Read more.
Nanoplastics are known to represent a threat to marine ecosystems. Their combination with other contaminants of emerging concerns (CECs) may amplify ecotoxic effects, with unknown impacts on marine biodiversity. This study investigates the effects, single and combined, of bisphenol A (BPA)—one of the most hazardous CECs—and polystyrene nanoparticles (PS NPs)—as a proxy for nanoplastics, being among the most commonly found asmarine debris—on cholinesterase (ChE) activities of the ascidian Ciona robusta. ChE activity was first measured in the siphons, tunic, and viscera of wild-caught adult specimens and exposed in vitro to BPA (0.01, 0.21, 0.69 mM) and PS NPs (0.0096–0.096 mM; 8.096 × 109–1010 particles, respectively) alone and combined for 15 min of incubation. PS NPs’ behavior in milliQ water and in the ChE assay reaction buffer was characterized alone, combined with BPA, and analyzed through ζ-potential measurements via Dynamic Light Scattering. The results revealed that ChE activity was predominant in the viscera and siphons of C. robusta; PS NPs did not affect the ChE activity alone or combined, while BPA caused a concentration-dependent inhibition of ChE activity in the viscera. No changes in ζ-potential were observed for PS NPs alone or combined with BPA in the ChE buffer, suggesting no interaction. Further investigations are needed to understand the potential neurotoxic consequences for C. robusta and ecological risk scenarios due to exposure to BPA and nanoplastics in marine coastal waters. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Ecotoxicology)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>ChE vs. ASCh activity (nmol/min/mg prot) in the three tissues of Ciona as siphons (S), tunic (T), and viscera (V). Values are shown as mean ± standard deviation. Asterisks denote significant differences compared to (V) group. A 2-way ANOVA with a Tukey multiple comparisons test was performed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>ChE vs. ASCh activity (<b>A</b>) = BPA alone, (<b>B</b>) = PS NPs alone, (<b>C</b>) = PS NPs + BPA combined) in the viscera of Ciona in vitro exposed to BPA (0.01–0.21–0.69 mM), PS NPs (0.0096–0.096 mM) and combined (0.096 mM PS NPs and 0.69 mM BPA). Values are shown as mean ± standard deviation. Asterisks denote significant differences compared to control groups and letters between treatment groups (a = 0.01 mM, c = 0.69 mM). Two-way ANOVA with a Tukey multiple comparisons test and anUnpaired <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test were performed.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 4878 KiB  
Article
Involvement of Metalloproteases in the Fertilization of the Ascidian Halocynthia roretzi
by Hitoshi Sawada, Ikuya Hattori, Noritaka Hashii and Takako Saito
Biomolecules 2024, 14(12), 1487; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom14121487 - 22 Nov 2024
Viewed by 658
Abstract
We previously reported that five astacin-like metalloproteases with thrombospondin type-1 repeats (Tasts) located on the sperm surface are a promising candidate as the protease involved in sperm penetration of the vitelline coat (VC) during fertilization of the ascidian Ciona intestinalis type A (Phlebobranchia). [...] Read more.
We previously reported that five astacin-like metalloproteases with thrombospondin type-1 repeats (Tasts) located on the sperm surface are a promising candidate as the protease involved in sperm penetration of the vitelline coat (VC) during fertilization of the ascidian Ciona intestinalis type A (Phlebobranchia). However, whether such a protease is involved in the fertilization of other ascidians is unknown. Here, we investigated the effects of four metalloprotease inhibitors on the fertilization of the ascidian Halocynthia roretzi (Stolidobranchia). Three metalloprotease inhibitors, GM6001, TAPI-0, and TAPI-1, strongly inhibited fertilization at 33 and 11 μM, whereas TAPI-2 weakly inhibited fertilization at 33 μM. In contrast, GM6001NC (negative control) had no effect on fertilization at 100 μM. Furthermore, GM6001 had no inhibitory effect on the fertilization of VC-deprived eggs. The metalloprotease appears to function at the middle or late stage of fertilization. Ten Tast genes were identified in the H. roretzi genome database, among which four genes (HrTast1, HrTast2b, HrTast2c, and HrTast3c) possessed a single transmembrane domain in the N-terminal region. These four genes are transcribed in the testis and ovary, as revealed by RT-PCR. Anti-HrTast2c IgG raised against a peptide corresponding to the Zn-binding consensus sequence weakly inhibited fertilization at 0.5 mg/mL. These results led us to propose that sperm astacin-like metalloproteases may be involved in sperm penetration of the VC during H. roretzi fertilization. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gametogenesis and Gamete Interaction, 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Effects of metalloprotease inhibitors on <span class="html-italic">H. roretzi</span> fertilization. (<b>a</b>) Metalloprotease inhibitors (TAPI-0 (purple), TAPI-1 (red), GM6001 (green), and TAPI-2 (orange)) were dissolved in DMSO at a concentration of 10 mM and were serially diluted 3-fold with ASW. The final inhibitor concentrations are indicated on the abscissa. GM6001NC (negative control; blue) is an analog of GM6001 without a metal-chelating hydroxamate group. The final concentration of DMSO (blue) used as a vehicle was 1% at 100 μM. Error bar: SE (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 5). (<b>b</b>) The structures of the compounds used in (<b>a</b>) are illustrated. Every compound has a Leu residue at the P1′ position (green), whereas only strong inhibitors such as GM6001, TAPI-0, and TAPI-1 possess an aromatic ring at the P2′ position (blue circle). Notably, MG6001NC, lacking a hydroxamate group, has no inhibitory activity, even with the presence of an aromatic ring at the P2′ position (not indicated by a blue circle). For the nomenclature of the P1′ and P2′ positions, see [<a href="#B37-biomolecules-14-01487" class="html-bibr">37</a>,<a href="#B38-biomolecules-14-01487" class="html-bibr">38</a>]. (<b>c</b>) Effects of GM6001 on the fertilization of intact and VC-free eggs of <span class="html-italic">H. roretzi</span>. None, 0.1% DMSO; GM6001, 25 μM GM6001 containing 0.1% DMSO. Error bar: SE (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Effects of the timing of the addition of GM6001 (metalloprotease inhibitor; green) or MG115 (proteasome inhibitor; blue) after nonself-sperm addition during fertilization. After insemination, a small volume (5 μL) of 10 mM GM6001 or MG115 was added to the egg suspension in ASW in a final volume of 500 μL. After incubation at 13 °C for 1 h, the fertilization ratio was determined by counting the number of total eggs and fertilized eggs on the basis of VC elevation. (<b>a</b>) One representative result. (<b>b</b>) Five experimental results (mean ± SE).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Schematic drawings of four <span class="html-italic">H. roretzi</span> Tast (astacin-like metalloprotease with thrombospondin type 1 repeats) proteins and domains, as predicted from the respective gene models. The domain organization, including the transmembrane domain, of <span class="html-italic">Ciona intestinalis</span> type A Tast proteins (CiTast1, CiTast2a, CiTast2b, CiTast2c, and CiTast2d) is also illustrated in the upper panel.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Genomic organization of clustered <span class="html-italic">H. roretzi Tast</span> genes in scaffold 41, where <span class="html-italic">HrTast2a</span>, <span class="html-italic">2b</span>, <span class="html-italic">2c</span>, and <span class="html-italic">2d</span> are contiguously located, and in scaffold 261, where <span class="html-italic">HrTast3a</span>, <span class="html-italic">3b</span>, and <span class="html-italic">3c</span> contiguously reside.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Molecular phylogenetic tree of astacin-like metalloproteases with thrombospondin type-1 repeats. Proteins containing an astacin-like metalloprotease domain and thrombospondin type-1 repeat were multialigned via MEGAX and viewed via a phylogenetic tree. <span class="html-italic">Ciona intestinalis</span> type A (indicated by CiTast or KH), <span class="html-italic">Ciona savignyi</span> (Cisavi), <span class="html-italic">Halocynthia roretzi</span> (Harore or HrTast), and <span class="html-italic">Halocynthia aurantium</span> (Haaura). To clarify the molecular phylogenetic relationship, CiTast1, 2a, 2b, 2c, and 2d were indicated by blue, while HrTast1, 2a, 2b, 2c, 2d, 3a, 3b, and 3c were indicated by red.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>mRNA expression of <span class="html-italic">HrTast</span> genes. The ovary, testis, gill tissue, muscle tissue, and hepatopancreas were dissected from each sexually mature <span class="html-italic">H. roretzi</span> during the spawning season, from which RNAs were isolated and subjected to RT-PCR using the respective primers indicated in <a href="#biomolecules-14-01487-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a>. The PCR products were subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized via UV irradiation of gels stained with ethidium bromide. The PCR products from cDNA are denoted with red circles. The <span class="html-italic">EF1a</span> gene was used as an internal standard and is expressed in every tissue or organ. M, marker; Ov, ovary: Te, testis: G, gill; Mu, muscle; Hp, hepatopancreas.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Effects of anti-HrTast2c peptide antibodies (positions 1 and 2) on fertilization. Two peptide antibodies against the HrTast2c Zn-binding consensus sequence (position 1) and the unique sequence (position 2) were generated in rabbits. The IgG preparations, which were obtained from the respective antisera as described in the Materials and Methods, were dialyzed against ASW and preincubated with sperm at a final concentration of 0.5 mg/mL. After preincubation, a small volume of egg suspension was mixed in a total volume of 500 μL. Three independent fertilization experiments were carried out, and the results are listed in (<b>a</b>). The combined data at 0.5 mg/mL are depicted in (<b>b</b>). Error bar, SE (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Prediction of the 3D structure of HrTast2c with AlphaFold2. (<b>a</b>) Full-length HrTast2c (inactive pro-HrTast2c) containing the pro-domain (cyan). (<b>b</b>) Active HrTast2c. The Zn-binding segments (green) in the active site are exposed after the pro-domain is removed. (<b>c</b>) Superposition of Aa-astacin (blue, PDB ID: 1AST [<a href="#B36-biomolecules-14-01487" class="html-bibr">36</a>]) and AlphaFold2-predicted HrTast2c (yellow). Zn-binding segments are shown as green sticks, and Zn<sup>2+</sup> ions are shown in red. The Zn-binding segments are highly conserved between these two proteins. The inset shows a zoomed-in view of the catalytic center of the protease domain.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 11443 KiB  
Article
Immunohistochemical Characterization of Spermatogenesis in the Ascidian Ciona robusta
by Haruka Sakurai, Kogiku Shiba, Katsumi Takamura and Kazuo Inaba
Cells 2024, 13(22), 1863; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells13221863 - 11 Nov 2024
Viewed by 860
Abstract
Animals show diverse processes of gametogenesis in the evolutionary pathway. Here, we characterized the spermatogenic cells in the testis of the marine invertebrate Ciona robusta. Ciona sperm differentiate in a non-cystic type of testis, comprising many follicles with various sizes and stages of [...] Read more.
Animals show diverse processes of gametogenesis in the evolutionary pathway. Here, we characterized the spermatogenic cells in the testis of the marine invertebrate Ciona robusta. Ciona sperm differentiate in a non-cystic type of testis, comprising many follicles with various sizes and stages of spermatogenic cells. In the space among follicles, we observed free cells that were recognized by antibody against Müllerian inhibiting substance, a marker for vertebrate Sertoli cells. We further categorized the spermatogenic cells into four round stages (RI to RIV) and three elongated stages (EI to EIII) by morphological and immunohistochemical criteria. An antibody against a vertebrate Vasa homolog recognized a few large spermatogonium-like cells (RI) near the basal wall of a follicle. Consistent with the period of meiosis, a synaptonemal complex protein SYCP3 was recognized from early spermatocytes (RII) to early spermatids (E1). Acetylated tubulins were detected in spermatids before flagellar elongation at the RIV stage and became distributed along the flagella. Electron microscopy showed that the free cells outside the testicular follicle possessed a characteristic of vertebrate Sertoli cells. These results would provide a basis for basic and comparative studies on the mechanism of spermatogenesis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Cell Biology of Fertilization)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Paraffin section images of testicular follicles in the ascidian <span class="html-italic">Ciona robusta.</span> (<b>A</b>) A section of the testis, showing that it is composed of numerous testicular follicles (yellow circle). (<b>B</b>) Distribution of spermatogenic cells within a testicular follicle. Cells with round nuclei are located in the peripheral region, while mature sperm are seen in the central region, connected to the efferent duct (dashed line). Abbreviation: ef, efferent duct. (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>) Localization of different stages of spermatogenic cells within a follicle. The areas highlighted by dashed squares in (<b>C</b>) are shown at higher magnification in (<b>D</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Immunofluorescence image of a frozen section stained with anti-Müllerian Inhibiting Substance (MIS) antibody. (<b>A</b>) MIS H-300 positive cells (red) are localized in the space between testicular follicles. Scale bar, 20 μm. (<b>B</b>) The cells located between follicles display a round shape. Scale bar, 5 μm. Blue, DAPI staining.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Immunofluorescence image of a frozen section stained with an antibody against <span class="html-italic">Ciona robusta</span> Vasa homolog (CiVH). (<b>A</b>) CiVH signals (red) are detected in a few large cells located along the basal region of a testicular follicle. Scale bar, 20 μm. (<b>B</b>) CiVH-positive cells appear round and large, likely representing primordial germ cells or spermatogonia (RI). The immunofluorescence signal was present throughout the cytoplasm but not in the nucleus (blue). Scale bar, 5 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Immunofluorescence image of a frozen section stained with an antibody against TD09. This protein is one of the gene products from highly expressed genes in <span class="html-italic">Ciona</span> testis, showing homology with the synaptonemal complex protein SYCP3. (<b>A</b>) The antibody recognizes a broad area of the testis (red), except for the central region near the efferent duct containing mature sperm. Scale bar, 20 μm. (<b>B</b>,<b>C</b>) The anti-TD09 antibody detects the nuclei of both round-stage cells (RII to RIV; (<b>B</b>)) and short-flagellated elongated-stage cells (EI; (<b>C</b>)). Scale bar, 5 μm. Blue, DAPI staining.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Immunofluorescence image of a frozen section stained with an antibody against TD02. This protein is one of the gene products from highly expressed genes in <span class="html-italic">Ciona</span> testis, showing homology with histone H1-like protein or protamine. (<b>A</b>) The antibody recognizes spermatids and mature sperm (red) located in the central area of the testicular follicle near the efferent duct. Scale bar, 20 μm. (<b>B</b>–<b>D</b>) The antibody stained the nuclei of late spermatids and mature sperm (EII; (<b>C</b>), EIII; (<b>D</b>)) but not early-stage spermatids (EI; (<b>B</b>)), even though the latter had already formed long flagella. Scale bar, 5 μm. Red, TD02 immunostaining. Blue, DAPI staining.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Immunofluorescence image of a frozen section stained with anti-acetylated α-tubulin antibody. (<b>A</b>) Immunofluorescence analysis of a testis section showed strong staining in the central area of the testicular follicle, similar to anti-TD02 staining. Scale bar, 20 μm. (<b>B</b>) The antibody recognizes the cytoplasm of non-flagellated spermatids (EI stage). Scale bar, 5 μm. (<b>C</b>) The flagella of mature sperm were strongly stained by the anti-acetylated α-tubulin antibody. Scale bar, 5 μm. Red, immunostaining with anti-acetylated α-tubulin antibody. Blue, DAPI staining.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Transmission electron microscopy images of <span class="html-italic">Ciona</span> testis. (<b>A</b>) An image of a testicular follicle shows the non-cystic distribution of spermatogenic cells. A free cell with prominent heterochromatin in the nucleus (asterisk) is visible between testicular follicles. Scale bar, 5 μm. (<b>B</b>) A higher magnification of the free cell (asterisk). Scale bar, 2 μm. (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>) Free cells (asterisks) are sometimes associated with the outer layer of a testicular follicle. Scale bars, 2 μm (<b>C</b>); 5 μm (<b>D</b>). (<b>E</b>,<b>F</b>) Long striated rootlets extend from the basal body of a flagellum in flat epithelial cells. Scale bars, 1 μm. (<b>G</b>) The axonemes exhibit a 9+2 structure with dynein arms, indicating motility. Scale bar, 500 nm. Arrows, striated rootlets.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>A schematic drawing of <span class="html-italic">Ciona</span> spermatogenesis based on the staining patters by several marker antibodies. Spermatogenic cells are categorized into four round stages (RI to RIV) and three elongated stages (EI to EIII). The reactivities against the antibodies used in this study and the localizations are indicated by colors. Stages at RI, RII/RIII and RIV/EI/EII/EIII are considered as spermatogonia, spermatocytes, and spermatids, respectively (see text).</p>
Full article ">
28 pages, 3510 KiB  
Review
Harnessing Ascidians as Model Organisms for Environmental Risk Assessment
by Amalia Rosner and Baruch Rinkevich
Environments 2024, 11(11), 232; https://doi.org/10.3390/environments11110232 - 23 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1285
Abstract
Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA) often relies on a restricted set of species as bio-indicators, introducing uncertainty when modeling complex environmental variables. This may lead to oversimplified or erroneous risk assessments. Ascidians, marine filter-feeding sessile chordates, are valuable models for scientific research in various [...] Read more.
Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA) often relies on a restricted set of species as bio-indicators, introducing uncertainty when modeling complex environmental variables. This may lead to oversimplified or erroneous risk assessments. Ascidians, marine filter-feeding sessile chordates, are valuable models for scientific research in various biological fields such as stem cell biology, embryogenesis, regeneration, innate immunity, and developmental biology. Their global distribution, sensitivity to pollutants, high abundance, mass sexual reproduction, and habitation in coastal areas impacted by anthropogenic pollution make them excellent indicators for monitoring marine pollution and global environmental changes, including biological invasions and species diversity diminution cases. Despite their potential as environmental bioindicators, ascidians remain underutilized in ERAs (≤0.13% of ERA studies), particularly in the field of chemical pollution impact assessment, primarily due to a lack of standardization. This underrepresentation poses a challenge for accurate modeling, especially in models relying on a broad range of species (e.g., Species Sensitivity Distributions). Given these constraints, expanding the use of ascidians in ERAs could improve the comprehension and precision of environmental changes and their assessments. This underscores the necessity for future research to establish standardized testing protocols and choose the most suitable ascidian species for inclusion in ERAs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Risk Assessment of Aquatic Ecosystem)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Phylogenetic tree based on 18S ribosomal RNA (18S rRNA) gene fragments of ascidian species reviewed in this study. A few species are not represented due to the absence of their 18S gene sequences in the database. The taxonomic order of the species is depicted, illustrating the clustering of species within the same order. The analysis was conducted using the EMBL-EBI T-Coffee program [<a href="#B33-environments-11-00232" class="html-bibr">33</a>]. The NCBI GenBank accession numbers for the 18S rRNA gene sequences used are as follows: <span class="html-italic">Ascidiella scabra</span> (AB811928.1), <span class="html-italic">Botrylloides leachi</span> (JN573237.1), <span class="html-italic">Botrylloides_violaceus</span> (AY903927.1), <span class="html-italic">Botryllus_schlosseri</span> (FM244858.1), <span class="html-italic">Ciona intestinalis</span> (AB013017.1), <span class="html-italic">Ciona savignyi</span> (LC547329.1), <span class="html-italic">Didemnum molle</span> (AB211071.1), <span class="html-italic">Didemnum vexillum</span> (JF738071.1), <span class="html-italic">Halocynthia roretzi</span> (AB013016.1), <span class="html-italic">Herdmania momus</span> (AF165827.1), <span class="html-italic">Microcosmus exasperates</span> (XR005567858.1), <span class="html-italic">Molgula manhattensis</span> (L12426.2), <span class="html-italic">Phallusia nigra</span> (FM244845.1), <span class="html-italic">Polycarpa mytiligera</span> (FM244860.1), <span class="html-italic">Styela clava</span> (XR_005567858.1), <span class="html-italic">Styela_plicata</span> (L12444.2).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Modes of life cycles in two ascidian model species: (<b>a</b>) a solitary ascidian (<span class="html-italic">Ciona</span> spp.) revealing classical sexual reproduction progressions of a broadcasting species; (<b>b</b>) asexual (outer cycle in the diagram) and sexual phases in a colonial ascidian (<span class="html-italic">Botryllus schlosseri</span>) highlighted by weekly astogenic rounds of zooidal life and death (each cycle is called blastogenesis). Each blastogenic cycle is divided into four stages (A–D) where three generations of colonial modules (the functional zooids and two cohorts of developing buds, primary and secondary buds) coexist side by side, depicting highly synchronized developmental statuses as the colony progresses through blastogenesis. At stage D, the functional zooids start their degeneration, first by closing the siphons, where simultaneously all zooids undergo cell apoptosis and phagocytosis processes within the next 24–36 h and are morphologically absorbed, while the primary buds mature to the zooidal level of development. Subsequently, stage A of the following blastogenic cycle begins as primary buds complete their development into zooids by opening the inhalant siphons and resuming water filtration, while secondary buds (budlets) develop to the primary bud’s state, starting the generation of new sets of secondary buds. Gametogenesis is highly synchronized with the blastogenic cycle among modules of the same generation. The sexual cycle is typified as brooding, where gametes start differentiation within the budlets. Gametes maturation and egg fertilization occur within the zooids (at the onset of stage A). Embryos differentiation is synchronized with the blastogenic stage and continues within the zooids (inner cycle; showing for each blastogenic stage a single large zooid with its bud/s and budlet/s), culminating in the release of the larvae into the surrounding waters at late blastogenic stage C. The larvae swim for a very short period until they settle, undergo metamorphosis starting with the absorption of the tail, and new juveniles (oozooids) are formed, and a colony is formed by repeated blastogenic cycles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Pie charts depicting taxa percentages for search hits in the ‘Web of Science’ and ‘Google Scholar’ databases, filtered by the terms ‘environmental risk assessments’ and ‘marine’ environment, as compared to the total hits for ‘environmental risk assessment’ (marine and terrestrial). Each taxon (a group of different bioindicators) is represented by a specific-colored descriptor detailed in the caption. The black sections encompass the residual hits for taxa with the smaller number of hits. The magnified pie sections on the right provide a detailed breakdown for some of these taxa. <a href="#app1-environments-11-00232" class="html-app">Supplementary Table S1</a> details the specific queries used to obtain the data for each taxon.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Commonly used model ascidians: the solitary ascidians (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">Ciona robusta</span> and (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">Ciona intestinalis</span> (by John Bishop from the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom), once considered as a single species; (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) different color morphs of the colonial ascidian <span class="html-italic">Botryllus schlosseri</span>. (<b>c</b>) A colony reared in the laboratory at the Israel Oceanography and Limnological Research, Haifa, and maintained at a constant temperature of 20 °C with a regimen of 12:12 light:dark hours. This colony is a descendant of the Monterey, California, population; (<b>d</b>) a colony from New Zealand reared on a glass slide.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Pictures of additional solitary (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) and colonial ascidian (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) used in toxicity, environmental pollution monitoring tests, and biological invasions. (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">Phallusia</span> spp.; (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">Polycarpa</span> spp.; (<b>c</b>) <span class="html-italic">Halocynthia</span> spp.; (<b>d</b>) <span class="html-italic">Botrylloides</span> spp.; (<b>e</b>) <span class="html-italic">Didemnum</span> spp.; (<b>f</b>) <span class="html-italic">Didemnum vexillum</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Pie charts depicting taxa percentages for search hits in ‘Google Scholar’ databases, filtered by the terms: (<b>a</b>) ‘environmental risk assessment’ and ‘marine’ environment, and ‘invasion’ (61.5% of hits) as compared to the total hits for ‘environmental risk assessments’ and ‘invasion’ (100%). The total number of hits involving individual taxa exceeds the number of hits for ‘environmental risk assessment’, ‘marine’ environment, and ‘invasion’, as many publications examine multiple taxa; (<b>b</b>) ‘environmental risk assessment’ and ‘marine’ environment, and ‘biodiversity’ (62.6%) as compared to the total hits for ‘environmental risk assessments’ and ‘biodiversity’ (100%). The total number of hits involving individual taxa exceeds the number of hits for ‘environmental risk assessment’ and ‘marine’ environment and ‘biodiversity’, as many publications examine multiple taxa. Each taxon is represented by a specific-colored descriptor detailed in the caption. The magnified pie sections on the right are for categories with smaller numbers of hits. <a href="#app1-environments-11-00232" class="html-app">Supplementary Table S2</a> details the specific queries used to obtain the data for each taxon.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>A graphical representation illustrating the potential applications of ascidian-based bioassays within the framework of ERA. The bioassays utilize both solitary and colonial ascidians, which may offer unique advantages for studying different environmental impacts. MCR—multiple clonal ramets; Blue arrows indicate bioassays that have already been successfully employed in toxicity testing; Red arrows represent potential applications that have yet to be widely explored.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 4753 KiB  
Article
New Clavelina (Ascidiacea) Species from the Bahamas
by Xavier Turon and Susanna López-Legentil
Taxonomy 2024, 4(3), 661-679; https://doi.org/10.3390/taxonomy4030034 - 3 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1746
Abstract
The ascidian fauna of the Bahamas remains grossly understudied. Here, we examined specimens of the genus Clavelina collected from four Bahamian islands using morphological observations and genetic barcoding. Only three species of Clavelina have been previously reported in the Caribbean: C. picta, [...] Read more.
The ascidian fauna of the Bahamas remains grossly understudied. Here, we examined specimens of the genus Clavelina collected from four Bahamian islands using morphological observations and genetic barcoding. Only three species of Clavelina have been previously reported in the Caribbean: C. picta, C. oblonga, and C. puertosecensis. Here, we report C. picta and three species new to science: C. rochae, C. pawliki, and C. erwinorum. C. picta and C. pawliki were found in the northernmost island surveyed, while C. rochae and C. erwinorum were particularly prevalent on the southeastern Bahamian islands. A complete review of genetic barcoding data and morphological characters of accepted Clavelina species was performed. The unique combination of in vivo coloration, morphological characteristics, haplotypes, and species distribution supported the establishment of three new species, significantly adding to the diversity of the genus Clavelina in the Caribbean. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic representation of a zooid with a straight abdomen (<b>A</b>) and a twisted abdomen (<b>B</b>). D: dorsal side; V: ventral side. Note that gonads lie on the right in (<b>A</b>) and the left in (<b>B</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schemes of the main patterns of thoracic musculature observed. (<b>A</b>) The most common longitudinal pattern in <span class="html-italic">Clavelina</span> species is fibers that run posteriorly from the anterior end of the endostyle and the oral, neural, and atrial zones. (<b>B</b>) In the transverse pattern, fibers originate on the ventral side, running dorsally and then passing posteriorly. (<b>C</b>) In the ventral pattern, the ventral fibers closest to the endostyle run towards it and then enter the abdomen. Note that this figure is highly schematic. In the fixed zooids, fibers anastomose, bifurcate, and merge over their length.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Images of Bahamian <span class="html-italic">Clavelina</span> species. (<b>A</b>) Colony of <span class="html-italic">C. picta</span> from Sweetings Cay photographed on 30 May 2008. (<b>B</b>) <span class="html-italic">C. picta</span> (asterisk), <span class="html-italic">C. pawliki</span> (triangle), and <span class="html-italic">Ecteinascidia turbinata</span> (arrow) growing together in Sweetings Cay, photo taken on 10 June 2008. (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>) <span class="html-italic">C. rochae</span> from Plana Cay, photographed on 25 June 2007. (<b>E</b>) Colony of <span class="html-italic">C. pawliki</span> photographed at Sweetings Cay on 17 June 2007. (<b>F</b>) <span class="html-italic">C. pawliki</span> and <span class="html-italic">E. turbinata</span> growing together in Sweetings Cay, photographed on 10 June 2008. (<b>G</b>) A colony of <span class="html-italic">C. erwinorum</span> from San Salvador photographed on 5 June 2008. (<b>H</b>) <span class="html-italic">C. erwinorum</span> photographed in Key Largo, Florida (USA) on 14 November 2006. Scale bar 1 cm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p><span class="html-italic">Clavelina picta</span>. (<b>A</b>) Image of two zooid clumps; (<b>B</b>) Zooid without gonads. Note the straight abdomen. (<b>C</b>) Abdomen with gonads. (<b>D</b>–<b>F</b>) Left, ventral, and dorsal views of the thoracic musculature of a zooid. The dark body at the base of the branchial sac is a copepod. (<b>G</b>) Ventral view of the anterior part of a straight abdomen of the same zooid than in D–F, showing muscles passing from right to left. (<b>H</b>) Dissected thorax (stained). (<b>I</b>) Larva. Scale bars: (<b>A</b>), 15 mm; (<b>B</b>,<b>C</b>), 2 mm; (<b>D</b>–<b>G</b>), 2 mm; (<b>H</b>), 2 mm; (<b>I</b>), 0.4 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p><span class="html-italic">Clavelina rochae</span>. (<b>A</b>) Image of two zooids with their tunic. (<b>B</b>) Zooids extracted from the tunic. Note the twisted abdomen in the left zooid and the straight abdomen in the right zooid. (<b>C</b>) Branchial sac with brooded embryos. (<b>D</b>) Abdomen with gonads. (<b>E</b>) Dissected thorax (stained). (<b>F</b>) Larva. Scale bars: (<b>A</b>), 5 mm; (<b>B</b>), 2 mm; (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>), 1 mm; (<b>E</b>): 1 mm; (<b>F</b>), 0.25 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p><span class="html-italic">Clavelina pawliki</span>. (<b>A</b>) Image of the basal part of two abdomens united to the basal layer of tunic. (<b>B</b>) Zooid. Note the straight abdomen and some brooded embryos. (<b>C</b>–<b>E</b>) Thoracic musculature from right (<b>C</b>), ventral (<b>D</b>), and dorsolateral (<b>E</b>) views. (<b>E</b>) Image stained to show the finer bands. (<b>F</b>) Dissected thorax (stained). (<b>G</b>) Larva (stained). Note that the tail separation from the body is an artifact of manipulation. Scale bars: (<b>A</b>), 2 mm; (<b>B</b>), 2 mm; (<b>C</b>–<b>E</b>), 2 mm; (<b>F</b>), 1 mm; (<b>G</b>), 0.3 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p><span class="html-italic">Clavelina erwinorum.</span> (<b>A</b>) Image of a clump of zooids basally embedded in a common tunic. (<b>B</b>) Zooid. Note the twisted abdomen. (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>) Thoracic musculature from ventral (<b>C</b>) and laterodorsal (<b>D</b>) views. (<b>E</b>) Thorax cut open; the right side is shown (stained). (<b>F</b>) Larva. Scale bars: (<b>A</b>), 5 mm; (<b>B</b>), 1 mm; (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>), 1 mm; (<b>E</b>): 1 mm; (<b>F</b>), 0.4 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Phylogeny of partial Cytochrome Oxidase I gene sequences from clavelinidae species. The phylogenetic position of species from this study is highlighted (bold lettering). Labels on terminal nodes of sequences indicate the ascidian species and GenBank accession numbers or sampling code. Collection countries are noted in parentheses. The tree topology was obtained from maximum likelihood (ML) analysis. Individual bootstrap values from neighbor-joining (NJ) are under the tree nodes and, for ML analyses, above tree nodes when support values are greater than 50%. The scale bar represents the number of substitutions per site.</p>
Full article ">
73 pages, 18532 KiB  
Review
An Overview on the Synthesis of Lamellarins and Related Compounds with Biological Interest
by Vasiliki-Panagiota M. Mitsiou, Anastasia-Maria N. Antonaki, Matina D. Douka and Konstantinos E. Litinas
Molecules 2024, 29(17), 4032; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29174032 - 26 Aug 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1268
Abstract
Lamellarins are natural products with a [3,4]-fused pyrrolocoumarin skeleton possessing interesting biological properties. More than 70 members have been isolated from diverse marine organisms, such as sponges, ascidians, mollusks, and tunicates. There is a continuous interest in the synthesis of these compounds. In [...] Read more.
Lamellarins are natural products with a [3,4]-fused pyrrolocoumarin skeleton possessing interesting biological properties. More than 70 members have been isolated from diverse marine organisms, such as sponges, ascidians, mollusks, and tunicates. There is a continuous interest in the synthesis of these compounds. In this review, the synthetic strategies for the synthesis of the title compounds are presented along with their biological properties. Three routes are followed for the synthesis of lamellarins. Initially, pyrrole derivatives are the starting or intermediate compounds, and then they are fused to isoquinoline or a coumarin moiety. Second, isoquinoline is the starting compound fused to an indole moiety. In the last route, coumarins are the starting compounds, which are fused to a pyrrole moiety and an isoquinoline scaffold. The synthesis of isolamellarins, azacoumestans, isoazacoumestans, and analogues is also described. The above synthesis is achieved via metal-catalyzed cross-coupling, [3 + 2] cycloaddition, substitution, and lactonization reactions. The title compounds exhibit cytotoxic, multidrug resistance (MDR), topoisomerase I-targeted antitumor, anti-HIV, antiproliferative, anti-neurodegenerative disease, and anti-inflammatory activities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Coumarin and Its Derivatives III)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Lamellarins found in nature.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Lamellarin’s related compounds with biological interest.</p>
Full article ">Scheme 1
<p>Synthesis of lamellarin G trimethyl ether (<b>5</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 2
<p>Synthesis of lamellarin framework <b>15</b>.</p>
Full article ">Scheme 3
<p>Total synthesis of ningalin A (<b>22</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 4
<p>Total synthesis of ningalin B (<b>34</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 5
<p>Total synthesis of lamellarin L (<b>43</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 6
<p>Total synthesis of ningalin B (<b>34</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 7
<p>Synthesis of ningalin B hexamethyl ether (<b>33</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 8
<p>Synthesis of ningalin B hexamethyl ether (<b>33</b>) and lamellarin G trimethyl ether (<b>5</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 9
<p>Synthesis of lamellarin G trimethyl ether (<b>5</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 10
<p>Synthesis of lamellarin D (<b>84</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 11
<p>Synthesis of lamellarins D (<b>84</b>), L (<b>43</b>), and N (<b>100</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 12
<p>Synthesis of lamellarin α 20-sulfate (<b>112</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 13
<p>Synthesis of ningalin B (<b>34</b>), lamellarin G (<b>123</b>), and lamellarin K (<b>124</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 14
<p>Synthesis of lamellarin G trimethyl ether (<b>5</b>) and ningalin B hexamethyl ether (<b>33</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 15
<p>Synthesis of <b>140</b> and <b>144a</b>–<b>h</b>, analogues of lamellarin D.</p>
Full article ">Scheme 16
<p>Synthesis of lamellarin α (<b>158</b>) and lamellarin α 13-sulfate (<b>155</b>), 20-sulfate (<b>112</b>), and 13,20-disulfate (<b>159</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 16 Cont.
<p>Synthesis of lamellarin α (<b>158</b>) and lamellarin α 13-sulfate (<b>155</b>), 20-sulfate (<b>112</b>), and 13,20-disulfate (<b>159</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 17
<p>Synthesis of lamellarin G trimethyl ether (<b>5</b>) and lamellarin S (<b>175</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 18
<p>Synthesis of lamellarins D (<b>84</b>) and H (<b>181</b>) and ningalin B (<b>34</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 19
<p>Synthesis of lamellarins L (<b>43</b>) and N (<b>100</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 20
<p>Synthesis of lamellarins I (<b>199a</b>) and C (<b>199b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 21
<p>Synthesis of lamellarin G trimethyl ether (<b>5</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 22
<p>Synthesis of lamellarin L (<b>43</b>) and lamellarin N (<b>100</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 23
<p>Synthesis of lamellarin D trimethyl ether (<b>218</b>) and lamellarin H (<b>181</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 24
<p>Synthesis of lamellarins η (<b>224a</b>), D (<b>84</b>), N (<b>100</b>), and α (<b>158</b>) and 5,6-dehydrolamellarin Y (<b>224b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 25
<p>Synthesis of lamellarin D (<b>84</b>), lamellarin H (<b>181</b>), and lamellarin analogues <b>236</b> and <b>239</b>.</p>
Full article ">Scheme 26
<p>Synthesis of lamellarins H (<b>181</b>) and η (<b>224a</b>), dihydrolamellarin η (<b>250</b>), lamellarin G trimethyl ether (<b>5</b>), lamellarin D trimethyl ether (<b>218</b>), and tris-desmethyl lamellarin G (<b>246</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 27
<p>Synthesis of lamellarin U (<b>256</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 28
<p>Synthesis of lamellarin D (<b>84</b>) using puruvic acid orthoester.</p>
Full article ">Scheme 29
<p>Synthesis of ningalin B (<b>34</b>) and lamellarins S (<b>175</b>) and Z (<b>277</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 30
<p>Total synthesis of lamellarins S (<b>175</b>), Z (<b>277</b>), L (<b>43</b>), G (<b>123</b>), and N (<b>100</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 31
<p>Synthesis of lamellarin D (<b>84</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 32
<p>Total synthesis of lamellarins L (<b>43</b>), J (<b>307</b>), G (<b>123</b>), and Z (<b>277</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 33
<p>Total synthesis of lamellarins U (<b>256</b>) and A3 (<b>318</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 34
<p>Synthesis of lamellarins D (<b>84</b>) and H (<b>181</b>) and lamellarin analogue <b>336</b>.</p>
Full article ">Scheme 35
<p>Total synthesis of lamellarin K (<b>124</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 36
<p>Total synthesis of lamellarin G trimethyl ether (<b>5</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 37
<p>Synthesis of lamellarins I (<b>199a</b>) and K (<b>124</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 38
<p>Synthesis of lamellarin D analogues.</p>
Full article ">Scheme 39
<p>Synthesis of lamellarin H (<b>181</b>), lamellarin α (<b>158</b>), and lamellarin α 13,20-disulfate (<b>159</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 40
<p>Synthesis of lamellarin alkaloids via metal–halogen exchange.</p>
Full article ">Scheme 41
<p>Synthesis of lamellarins U (<b>256</b>) and L (<b>43</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 42
<p>Synthesis of lamellarins L (<b>43</b>) and K (<b>124</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 43
<p>Synthesis of lamellarin D <b>(84</b>) and lamellarin 501 (<b>378</b>) derivatives.</p>
Full article ">Scheme 44
<p>Synthesis of lamellarin D triester derivatives with aminoacids.</p>
Full article ">Scheme 45
<p>Synthesis of lamellarin U (<b>256</b>) and its derivatives, and lamellarin L (<b>43</b>) by solid-phase procedure.</p>
Full article ">Scheme 46
<p>Synthesis of lamellarins by polymer-supported reagents.</p>
Full article ">Scheme 47
<p>Synthesis of lamellarin skeleton by 1,5-electrocyclization of azomethine ylides.</p>
Full article ">Scheme 48
<p>Synthesis of lamellarins G trimethyl ether (<b>5</b>), L (<b>43</b>), G (<b>123</b>), K (<b>124</b>), I (<b>199a</b>), C (<b>199b</b>), dihydro η (<b>250</b>), U (<b>256</b>), J (<b>307</b>), X (<b>404</b>), Y (<b>405</b>), T (<b>406</b>), F (<b>407</b>), and E (<b>408</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 49
<p>Synthesis of lamellarins D (<b>84</b>), N (<b>100</b>), α (<b>158</b>), η (<b>224a</b>), 5,6-dehydro Y (<b>224b</b>), 5,6-dehydro G trimethyl ether (<b>411</b>), 5,6-dehydro G (<b>412</b>), M (<b>413</b>), ζ (<b>414</b>), B (<b>415</b>), 5,6-dehydro J (<b>416</b>), W (<b>417</b>), ε (<b>418</b>), and X (<b>419</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 50
<p>Synthesis of lamellarin U (<b>256</b>) and lamellarin G trimethyl ether (<b>5</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 51
<p>Synthesis of lamellarin G trimethyl ether (<b>5</b>), lamellarin η (<b>224a</b>), and dihydrolamellarin η (<b>250</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 52
<p>Synthesis of lamellarin G trimethyl ether (<b>5</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 53
<p>Synthesis of lamellarin G trimethyl ether (<b>5</b>), lamellarin A4 or trisdesmethyllamellarin G (<b>246</b>), lamellarin D trimethyl ether (<b>218</b>), and lamellarin H (<b>181</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 54
<p>Synthesis of lamellarin D trimethyl ether (<b>218</b>), lamellarin D (<b>84</b>), and lamellarin analogues.</p>
Full article ">Scheme 55
<p>Synthesis of lamellarin analogues via 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction of isoquinolinium ylides to nitrostilbenes.</p>
Full article ">Scheme 56
<p>Synthesis of lamellarin G trimethyl ether (<b>5</b>) from 3-bromo-4-(3,4-dimethoxybenzoyl)-6,7-dimethoxychroman-2-one (<b>459</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 57
<p>Synthesis of lamellarin scaffold <b>239</b> from 2-phenylchromeno[3,4-<span class="html-italic">b</span>]pyrrol-4(3<span class="html-italic">H</span>)-one (<b>470d</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 58
<p>Synthesis of lamellarin D trimethyl ether (<b>218</b>), lamellarin H (<b>181</b>), and the lamellarin analogues <b>479</b> and <b>480</b>.</p>
Full article ">Scheme 59
<p>Synthesis of lamellarin D trimethyl ether (<b>218</b>) and lamellarin H (<b>181</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 60
<p>Synthesis of lamellarin D (<b>84</b>) and 501 (<b>378</b>) and tribenzyl ether of lamellarin D (<b>98</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 61
<p>Synthesis of ningalin B (<b>34</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 62
<p>Synthesis of isolamellarins A <b>494a</b>,<b>b</b>.</p>
Full article ">Scheme 63
<p>Synthesis of pentacyclic compound <b>498</b>.</p>
Full article ">Scheme 64
<p>Synthesis of isolamellarin A <b>505</b> and isolamellarins B <b>507a</b>,<b>b</b>.</p>
Full article ">Scheme 65
<p>Synthesis of isolamellarin A <b>505</b> and isolamellarin B <b>507a</b> under Ru(II)-catalysis.</p>
Full article ">Scheme 66
<p>Synthesis of isoazacoumestan <b>518</b>.</p>
Full article ">Scheme 67
<p>Synthesis of azacoumestans <b>520a</b>,<b>b</b>.</p>
Full article ">Scheme 68
<p>Synthesis of isoazacoumestans <b>524a</b>,<b>b</b>.</p>
Full article ">Scheme 69
<p>Synthesis of azacoumestrol (<b>529</b>).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 70
<p>Pd-catalyzed synthesis of azacoumestan <b>533</b>.</p>
Full article ">Scheme 71
<p>Synthesis of azacoumestan <b>533</b> and isoazacoumestan <b>536</b>.</p>
Full article ">Scheme 72
<p>Synthesis of azacoumestan <b>540</b> and isoazacoumestan <b>544</b>.</p>
Full article ">Scheme 73
<p>Pd-catalyzed synthesis of azacoumestanes <b>520a</b> and <b>549</b>.</p>
Full article ">Scheme 74
<p>Synthesis of azacoumestans <b>553a</b>–<b>h</b> by the Cadogan reaction.</p>
Full article ">Scheme 75
<p>Pd-catalyzed synthesis of azacoumestans <b>533</b> and <b>557a</b>–<b>f</b>.</p>
Full article ">Scheme 76
<p>Pd-catalyzed synthesis of azacoumestans <b>520a</b> and <b>559a</b>–<b>d</b>.</p>
Full article ">Scheme 77
<p>Pd-catalyzed synthesis of azacoumestans <b>520a</b> and <b>559a</b>–<b>z</b> (without base).</p>
Full article ">Scheme 78
<p>Pd-catalyzed synthesis of azacoumestans <b>520a</b> and <b>559e</b>,<b>I</b>,<b>j</b>,<b>v</b>,<b>w</b>,<b>aa</b>–<b>ae</b> under MW.</p>
Full article ">Scheme 79
<p>Pd-catalyzed synthesis of azacoumestans from alkynes under carbonylation.</p>
Full article ">Scheme 80
<p>Synthesis of azacoumestan derivatives <b>573</b>, <b>574</b>, and <b>576</b>–<b>579</b>.</p>
Full article ">Scheme 81
<p>Synthesis of isoazacoumestns <b>581a</b>–<b>s</b>.</p>
Full article ">Scheme 82
<p>Synthesis of azacoumestans <b>533 and 584a</b>–<b>j</b>.</p>
Full article ">Scheme 83
<p>Synthesis of “E-ring free” lamellarin analogues <b>587a</b>–<b>c</b>.</p>
Full article ">Scheme 84
<p>Synthesis of pentacycle isoazacoumestan analogues <b>592a</b>,<b>b</b>.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 3820 KiB  
Article
Updated and Corrected List of Hosts of European Pinnotherids (Crustacea, Decapoda, and Pinnotheridae): Relationship between Number of Hosts and Distribution
by Jose A. Cuesta, Sara Román, Isabel Muñoz, Ana Rodríguez de la Rúa, Carlos Farias, Luis Silva and Marina Delgado
Diversity 2024, 16(8), 470; https://doi.org/10.3390/d16080470 - 4 Aug 2024
Viewed by 698
Abstract
The present work provides an updated and corrected list of hosts for the five European species of pinnotherid crabs, taking into consideration all recent published works as well as new data obtained in the present study. In relation to the number of hosts, [...] Read more.
The present work provides an updated and corrected list of hosts for the five European species of pinnotherid crabs, taking into consideration all recent published works as well as new data obtained in the present study. In relation to the number of hosts, there are two groups of species, one composed by Pinnotheres pisum and Afropinnotheres monodi with the highest number of hosts, and a second group, with a reduced number of hosts and more specific taxa, consisting of three other species: Nepinnotheres pinnotheres, Pinnotheres bicristatus, and P. pectunculi. When studying the relationships between host preferences, host distributions, and pea crab distributions, we could not find a clear direct relationship between these parameters. Temperature is also probably an important influence and relevant factor responsible for the distribution of pinnotherid crabs, and this may be independent from the potential distribution due to the distribution of hosts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Marine Diversity)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Iberian Peninsula and the study area at the southwestern Spanish coast of the Gulf of Cádiz (black box). The locations of sampling stations during the surveys are shown as red (ACUVEN-2 and -3) and blue points (ARSA0318 and 0319).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Locations of pinnotherids crabs and hosts in the subtidal and shelf areas of the Gulf of Cádiz (southwestern Spain).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Presence-absence maps of the hosts <span class="html-italic">Anomia ephippium</span>, <span class="html-italic">Acanthocardia paucicostata</span>, and <span class="html-italic">Atrina fragilis</span> along the Gulf of Cadiz. Presence (blue dots)-absence (white dots) maps. LAT: latitude and LONG: longitude. Data from ACUVEN-2, ACUVEN-3, and ARSA0318 surveys.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3 Cont.
<p>Presence-absence maps of the hosts <span class="html-italic">Anomia ephippium</span>, <span class="html-italic">Acanthocardia paucicostata</span>, and <span class="html-italic">Atrina fragilis</span> along the Gulf of Cadiz. Presence (blue dots)-absence (white dots) maps. LAT: latitude and LONG: longitude. Data from ACUVEN-2, ACUVEN-3, and ARSA0318 surveys.</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 1990 KiB  
Article
The Interplay of TLR-NFκB Signalling Pathway and Functional Immune-Related Enzymes in the Inflammatory Response of Ciona robusta
by Luca Bisanti, Claudia La Corte, Mariano Dara, Federica Bertini, Jacopo Vizioli, Maria Giovanna Parisi, Matteo Cammarata and Daniela Parrinello
Animals 2024, 14(15), 2169; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14152169 - 25 Jul 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1060
Abstract
The close phylogenetic relationship between ascidians (Tunicata) and vertebrates makes them a powerful model for studying the innate immune system. To better understand the nature and dynamics of immune responses and the mechanisms through which bacterial infections are detected and translated into inflammation [...] Read more.
The close phylogenetic relationship between ascidians (Tunicata) and vertebrates makes them a powerful model for studying the innate immune system. To better understand the nature and dynamics of immune responses and the mechanisms through which bacterial infections are detected and translated into inflammation in Ciona robusta, we applied an approach combining in vivo lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation, immune-labelling techniques and functional enzymatic analyses. The immunohistochemistry showed that Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and nuclear factor kappa B (NFκB) were expressed during the inflammatory pharynx response 4 h post-LPS, with the formation of nodules in pharynx vessel lumen. Also, the endothelium vessels were involved in the inflammatory response. Observations of histological sections from naive and buffer-inoculated ascidians confirmed an immuno-positive response. Enzyme immune parameters—which included the activity of phenoloxidase, glutathione peroxidase, lysozyme, alkaline phosphatase and esterase—showed up-modulation 4 h after LPS injection, confirming their participation during ascidian inflammatory response. These findings provide new insights into the mechanisms underlying the LPS-induced C. robusta response and suggest that a broad innate immune mechanism, as in vertebrates, is involved in the regulation of inflammatory responses. Further findings in this direction are needed to cover knowledge gaps regarding the organized set of molecular and cellular networks involved in universal immune interactions with pathogens. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Aquatic Animals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Representative sections of <span class="html-italic">C. robusta</span> pharynx at 4 h post-LPS inoculation showing immunohistochemistry with anti-TLR4 and anti-NFκB antibodies. (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) Control ascidians (not injected); (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>) sham-injected ascidians inoculated with MS; (<b>E</b>,<b>F</b>) pharynx vessels at 4 h post-LPS inoculation showing densely populated haemocytes and nodules (nd) marked by the anti-TLR4 and anti-NFκB antibodies, respectively; (<b>G</b>,<b>H</b>) magnification of marked haemocyte nodules and endothelium (end) in the vessels. Scale bar 50 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Quantification of the immune-positive stained areas in pharynx vessels (percentage of stained cells; mean values ± SD) from slides belonging to experimental treatments. The letters indicate statistically significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05) between experimental groups.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Enzymatic response of phenoloxidase (PO), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), lysozyme (LYS), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and esterase (EST) in ascidians at 4 h post-inoculation with <span class="html-italic">E. coli</span> LPS. The letters indicate statistically significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05) between experimental groups.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 3226 KiB  
Article
Conserved Signaling Pathways in the Ciona robusta Gut
by Marco Gerdol, Samuele Greco, Rita Marino, Annamaria Locascio, Michelina Plateroti and Maria Sirakov
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(14), 7846; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25147846 - 18 Jul 2024
Viewed by 1087
Abstract
The urochordate Ciona robusta exhibits numerous functional and morphogenetic traits that are shared with vertebrate models. While prior investigations have identified several analogies between the gastrointestinal tract (i.e., gut) of Ciona and mice, the molecular mechanisms responsible for these similarities remain poorly understood. [...] Read more.
The urochordate Ciona robusta exhibits numerous functional and morphogenetic traits that are shared with vertebrate models. While prior investigations have identified several analogies between the gastrointestinal tract (i.e., gut) of Ciona and mice, the molecular mechanisms responsible for these similarities remain poorly understood. This study seeks to address this knowledge gap by investigating the transcriptional landscape of the adult stage gut. Through comparative genomics analyses, we identified several evolutionarily conserved components of signaling pathways of pivotal importance for gut development (such as WNT, Notch, and TGFβ-BMP) and further evaluated their expression in three distinct sections of the gastrointestinal tract by RNA-seq. Despite the presence of lineage-specific gene gains, losses, and often unclear orthology relationships, the investigated pathways were characterized by well-conserved molecular machinery, with most components being expressed at significant levels throughout the entire intestinal tract of C. robusta. We also showed significant differences in the transcriptional landscape of the stomach and intestinal tract, which were much less pronounced between the proximal and distal portions of the intestine. This study confirms that C. robusta is a reliable model system for comparative studies, supporting the use of ascidians as a model to study gut physiology. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Biology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>RNA-seq approach and preliminary results. (<b>A</b>) The anatomical parts of the <span class="html-italic">Ciona</span> gastrointestinal tract analyzed separately. S = stomach, PI = proximal intestine, DI = distal intestine, blue. (<b>B</b>) Principal component analysis, constructed based on log-transformed Transcript Per Million (TPM) expression values of all genes, summarizing the relatedness of the transcriptional profiles of the three biological samples of S (SA, SB, and SH), PI (PIA, PIB, and PIH), and DI (DIA, DIB, and DIH). (<b>C</b>) Heat map representing the log-transformed TPM expression levels of all DEGs characterized by fold change (FC) &gt; 10 in at least one pairwise comparison among S, PI, and ID. DEGs were hierarchically clustered based on Euclidean distance, using an average linkage method. (<b>D</b>) Heat map representing the log-transformed TPM expression levels of the <span class="html-italic">Hox</span> and <span class="html-italic">paraHox</span> genes, hierarchically clustered based on Euclidean distance, using an average linkage method. Genes displaying statistically significant over-expression in one of the three GI tracts are boxed. The terms A, B, and H refer to different individual animals; for details, see the Material and Methods (<a href="#sec4-ijms-25-07846" class="html-sec">Section 4</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Go enrichment and validation of digestion-related genes. Dendrogram representation of the significantly enriched GO terms in the S vs. I pairwise comparison. (<b>A</b>) GO terms associated with DEGs upregulated in S. (<b>B</b>) GO terms associated with DEGs upregulated in I. The size of the GO terms indicates the observed/expected ratio, whereas the color scale represents the statistical significance. GO term clustering was based on the presence of shared DEGs. (<b>C</b>) Validation by real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) of the digestion-related genes. Violin plots represent relative expression calculated using the ΔCt method, normalization against ELF1. N = 4. ns: not significant, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01 *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001, **** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0001.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Canonical WNT signaling reconstruction. (<b>A</b>) Schematic view of the WNT/βcatenin pathway realized using BioRender.com (accessed on 13 September 2023). (<b>B</b>) STRING networks represent the interactions among selected genes linked with the Wnt pathway, arbitrarily classified as ligands, receptors, nuclear effectors, modulators, targets, and related genes. Only mouse genes sharing at least one orthologous gene with <span class="html-italic">C. robusta</span> are shown. Gene interaction networks were constructed based on known or inferred relationships among mouse orthologs. (<b>C</b>) Heat map representing the log-transformed TPM expression levels of the main genes (excluding target and related genes) included in the STRING network, observed in <span class="html-italic">C. robusta</span> S, PI, and DI samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Canonical Notch signaling reconstruction. (<b>A</b>) Schematic view of the Notch pathway realized using BioRender.com (accessed on 13 September 2023). (<b>B</b>) STRING networks representing the interactions among selected genes linked with the Notch pathway, arbitrarily classified as ligands, receptors, nuclear effectors, modulators, targets, and related genes. Only mouse genes sharing at least one orthologous gene with <span class="html-italic">C. robusta</span> are shown. Gene interaction networks were constructed based on known or inferred relationships among mouse orthologs. (<b>C</b>) Heat map representing the log-transformed TPM expression levels of the main genes (excluding target and related genes) included in the STRING network observed in <span class="html-italic">C. robusta</span> S, PI, and DI samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Canonical TGFβ-BMP signaling reconstruction. (<b>A</b>) Schematic view of the TGFβ-BMP pathway realized using BioRender.com (accessed on 13 September 2023). (<b>B</b>) STRING networks representing the interactions among selected genes linked with the TGFβ-BMP pathway, arbitrarily classified as ligands, receptors, nuclear effectors, modulators, targets, and related genes. Only mouse genes sharing at least one orthologous gene with <span class="html-italic">C. robusta</span> are shown. Gene interaction networks were constructed based on known or inferred relationships among mouse orthologs. (<b>C</b>) Heat map representing the log-transformed TPM expression levels of the main genes (excluding target and related genes) included in the STRING network, observed in <span class="html-italic">C. robusta</span> S, PI, and DI samples.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 11374 KiB  
Article
Colonial Ascidian Populations at Inshore Coral Reefs of Norfolk Island, South Pacific
by Shannon Eckhardt, Tracy D. Ainsworth, William Leggat and Charlotte E. Page
Diversity 2024, 16(7), 384; https://doi.org/10.3390/d16070384 - 30 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1069
Abstract
Subtropical coral reefs such as the lagoonal reefs of Norfolk Island in the remote South Pacific are vastly understudied, with many benthic species unrecorded in the scientific literature. Here we report on ascidian populations from 2021 to 2023 at Norfolk Islands inshore reefs. [...] Read more.
Subtropical coral reefs such as the lagoonal reefs of Norfolk Island in the remote South Pacific are vastly understudied, with many benthic species unrecorded in the scientific literature. Here we report on ascidian populations from 2021 to 2023 at Norfolk Islands inshore reefs. Quantitative assessments spanning that period were conducted to assess ascidian presence, cover, and benthic interactions. We show ascidian cover remained persistently low and stable across the lagoonal reefs during the study period. We find adjacent reef site, Cemetery Bay showed variation in ascidian cover over time, where we measure a 3.2-fold increase in cover over 2 years. Ascidians were associated primarily with sand and sediment substrates at all reef locations. Recorded interactions between hard corals and ascidians were low. This study provides valuable insights into the population dynamics of ascidians within subtropical reef ecosystems. Ongoing ascidian population monitoring can provide a comprehensive understanding of ascidian dynamics whilst also providing insight of theimpact of anthropogenic stressors on benthic communities. Together, this can aid in informing management and conservation strategies for subtropical reefs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Patterns Of Marine Benthic Biodiversity)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>A</b>) Location of Norfolk Island 1400 km east of the Australian East Coast. (<b>B</b>) Map of Norfolk Island and location of the 3 study sites (red box). (<b>C</b>) Slaughter, Emily, and Cemetery Bay are located in the south of Norfolk Island. The KAVHA catchment creek flows directly into the lagoon at Emily Bay. (<b>D</b>) Timeline of the bleaching event in March 2020 [<a href="#B47-diversity-16-00384" class="html-bibr">47</a>], followed by benthic surveys in April 2021, April 2022, and April 2023. Disease was prevalent from December 2020 until April 2023 [<a href="#B48-diversity-16-00384" class="html-bibr">48</a>]. Red line: Austral summer, blue line: Austral winter. Picture credits: (<b>A</b>) Google Maps, 2023, (<b>B</b>,<b>C</b>) Google Earth, 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Images of ascidian colonies observed at Norfolk Island. (<b>A</b>–<b>C</b>) Colonial ascidian suspected to be <span class="html-italic">Diplosoma</span> spp. (<b>D</b>) Colonial ascidian suspected to be <span class="html-italic">Diplosoma</span> spp. containing photosynthetic algae. Photo credits: (<b>A</b>–<b>C</b>) Charlotte Page, (<b>D</b>) Ashley Coutts, Biofouling Solutions Pty Ltd., used with permission.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Benthic categories ascidians, cyanobacteria, hard coral, hard substrate, macroalgae, other benthic invertebrates, sand and sediment, turf, and all other. (<b>A</b>) Mean percent cover-based frequency distribution of the benthic categories present at each site (SB = Slaughter Bay; EB = Emily Bay; CB = Cemetery Bay) averaged over April 2021, 2022, and 2023. Each bar represents the relative proportion for each benthic category, calculated based on its mean percent cover value. See mean percent cover values in <a href="#diversity-16-00384-t002" class="html-table">Table 2</a>. (<b>B</b>) Ascidians. (<b>C</b>) Red cyanobacteria in the “cyanobacteria” category. (<b>D</b>) Hard coral. (<b>E</b>) Dead coral in the “hard substrate” category. (<b>F</b>) Macroalgae. (<b>G</b>) Anemone belonging to the “other benthic invertebrates” category. (<b>H</b>) Sand in the “sand and sediment” category. (<b>I</b>) Green turf belonging to the “turf” category. Photo credits: Norfolk Island, Charlotte Page, used with permission.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Box plots showing percent cover of <span class="html-italic">Diplosoma</span> spp. at (<b>A</b>) Slaughter Bay, (<b>B</b>) Emily Bay, (<b>C</b>) Cemetery Bay over three time points in April 2021, 2022, and 2023. The box represents the interquartile range (IQR; 25th to 75th percentile), with the black line indicating the median. Whiskers extend to 1.5 × IQR from the quartiles, and points beyond are outliers.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Percentage-based frequency distribution of (<b>A</b>) substrate <span class="html-italic">Diplosoma</span> spp. were found growing on and (<b>B</b>) interactions <span class="html-italic">Diplosoma</span> spp. had with cyanobacteria, hard coral, hard substrate, macroalgae, sand and sediment, and/or turf averaged the sites (SB = Slaughter Bay; EB = Emily Bay; CB = Cemetery Bay) over April 2021, 2022, and 2023. <span class="html-italic">Diplosoma</span> spp. growing (<b>C</b>) on coral, (<b>D</b>) in between a bed of macroalgae and turf, (<b>E</b>) on sand and interacting with turf, macroalgae, and coral, (<b>F</b>) on coral and interacting with red cyanobacteria, (<b>G</b>) on sediment and interacting with macroalgae, (<b>H</b>) on sand and interacting with turf and red cyanobacteria. Photo credits: Norfolk Island, Charlotte Page and Sophie Vuleta, used with permission.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 6494 KiB  
Article
Marine-Derived Phosphoeleganin and Its Semisynthetic Derivative Decrease IL6 Levels and Improve Insulin Signaling in Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells
by Ayewa L. Agognon, Marcello Casertano, Alessio Vito, Sonia Orso, Serena Cabaro, Federica Mormone, Cristina Morelli, Giuseppe Perruolo, Pietro Formisano, Marialuisa Menna, Concetta Imperatore and Francesco Oriente
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(11), 6039; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25116039 - 30 May 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 925
Abstract
Marine natural products constitute a great source of potential new antidiabetic drugs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of phosphoeleganin (PE), a polyketide purified from the Mediterranean ascidian Sidnyum elegans, and its derivatives PE/2 and PE/3 on insulin [...] Read more.
Marine natural products constitute a great source of potential new antidiabetic drugs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of phosphoeleganin (PE), a polyketide purified from the Mediterranean ascidian Sidnyum elegans, and its derivatives PE/2 and PE/3 on insulin sensitivity in human hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2) cells. In our experiments, insulin stimulates the phosphorylation of its receptor (INSR) and AKT by 1.5- and 3.5-fold, respectively, whereas in the presence of PE, PE/2, and PE/3, the insulin induced INSR phosphorylation is increased by 2.1-, 2-, and 1.5-fold and AKT phosphorylation by 7.1-, 6.0-, and 5.1-fold, respectively. Interestingly, PE and PE/2 have an additive effect on insulin-mediated reduction of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK) expression. Finally, PE and PE/2, but not PE/3, decrease interleukin 6 (IL6) secretion and expression before and after palmitic acid incubation, while in the presence of high glucose (HG), only PE reduces IL6. Levels of other cytokines are not significantly affected by PE and its derivates. All these data suggest that PE and its synthetic-derived compound, PE/2, significantly decrease IL6 and improve hepatic insulin signaling. As IL6 impairs insulin action, it could be hypothesized that PE and PE/2, by inhibiting IL6, may improve the hepatic insulin pathway. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) The marine polyketide phosphoeleganin (PE), purified from the Mediterranean ascidian <span class="html-italic">S. elegans.</span> (<b>b</b>) Previously reported pharmacological effects of PE and its semisynthetic derivatives PE/2 and PE/3. For the oxidative cleavage, reactions and conditions are (i) NaIO<sub>4</sub>, MeOH, rt, 3 h; (ii) NaBH<sub>4</sub>, 0 °C, 1 h.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Effect of PE, PE/2, and PE/3 on insulin receptor (INSR), AKT, and ERK1/2 phosphorylation. HepG2 cells were incubated with PE, PE/2, and PE/3 (25 µM) for 4 h and then stimulated with insulin (100 nM) for 10 min. The protein expression of pINSR, pAKT, and pERK1/2 was analyzed by Western blotting. INSR, AKT, and ERK1/2 bands were taken from a parallel gel loaded with the same lysates. Vinculin antibody was used for normalization. The autoradiographs shown are representative of three different experiments and subjected to densitometric analysis. Bars represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Asterisks denote statistical differences (* <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01; *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Effect of PE, PE/2, and PE/3 on PEPCK expression and glycogen content. (<b>a</b>) HepG2 cells were incubated with PE, PE/2, and PE/3 (25 µM) and insulin (100 nM) for 8 h. <span class="html-italic">PEPCK</span> mRNA levels were evaluated by real-time RT-PCR analysis. Data were normalized by the amount of <span class="html-italic">beta-ACTIN</span>, used as an internal control. Bars represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. (<b>b</b>) HepG2 cells were incubated with PE, PE/2, and PE/3 (25 µM) and insulin (100 nM) for 3 h. Glycogen content was measured as described in the <a href="#sec4-ijms-25-06039" class="html-sec">Section 4</a>. Asterisks denote statistical differences (* <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01; *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Effect of PE, PE/2, and PE/3 on IL6 expression. HepG2 cells were incubated with PE, PE/2, and PE/3 (25 µM) for 4 h. <span class="html-italic">IL6</span> mRNA levels were evaluated by real-time RT-PCR analysis. Data were normalized by the amount of <span class="html-italic">beta-ACTIN</span>, used as an internal control. Bars represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. Asterisks denote statistical differences (* <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Effect of PE, PE/2, and PE/3 on IL6 secretion and expression in the presence of palmitic acid (PA) (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) or high glucose (HG) (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>). HepG2 cells were incubated with PA (0.5 mM) for 8 h or with HG (60 mM) for 24 h with or without PE, PE/2, and PE/3 (25 µM). IL6 secretion was determined in the conditioned media by using a custom Human Magnetic Luminex Assay. <span class="html-italic">IL6</span> mRNA levels were evaluated by real-time RT-PCR analysis. Data were normalized by the amount of <span class="html-italic">beta-ACTIN</span>, used as an internal control. Bars represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. Asterisks denote statistical differences (* <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Scheme illustrating PE, PE/2, and PE/3 action in myoblast and hepatocyte. PE/3 exhibits a high inhibitory activity towards PTP1B, which enhances the INSR/AKT pathway and leads to increased glucose uptake in muscle cells. However, considering PE/2’s inability to act through PTP1B, we may suppose that its improvement of hepatic insulin resistance could be mediated by the inhibition of IL6 (black dashed arrow). Finally, PE possibly targets both IL6 and PTPB1, hence its amelioration of the insulin pathway in both muscle and hepatic cells (red arrows refer to negative regulation, black arrows refer to positive regulation).</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 4833 KiB  
Article
Environmentally Friendly and Efficient Methods for Mitigating the Density of Ascidian Fouling in Mediterranean Mussel Farming
by Dimitrios Tsotsios, Dimitrios K. Papadopoulos, Maria V. Alvanou, Ioannis Georgoulis, Athanasios Lattos, Basile Michaelidis, Konstantinos Feidantsis, Ioannis A. Giantsis and John A. Theodorou
Fishes 2024, 9(4), 135; https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9040135 - 14 Apr 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1335
Abstract
Ascidian biofouling generates significant challenges to bivalve aquaculture. Their rapid spread across almost every available surface leads to increased maintenance costs and reduced yields in shellfish farming. In addition, ascidians may introduce pathogens or toxins, further compromising the health and marketability of bivalve [...] Read more.
Ascidian biofouling generates significant challenges to bivalve aquaculture. Their rapid spread across almost every available surface leads to increased maintenance costs and reduced yields in shellfish farming. In addition, ascidians may introduce pathogens or toxins, further compromising the health and marketability of bivalve stocks and thereby necessitating strict management strategies to manage these impacts. The aim of this study was the evaluation of different management practices for eliminating ascidian fouling and the identification of the best method for Mytilus galloprovincialis (Lamarck, 1819) aquaculture farms. The effects of different anti-fouling treatments as well as their interactive outcomes were examined by conducting two experiments. Various experimental procedures were applied, including the temporally differential washing of mussels, air exposure and immersion in 50 ppt and 70 ppt salinity solutions, as well as the combination of these applications. All treatments reduced the number of ascidian colonies on mussel socks but at varying proportions. Immersing mussel socks in a 70 ppt salinity solution followed by air exposure for 1 day was the most efficient method and led to a 93% eradication. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Map location of the Amvrakikos Gulf and the area of Mazoma Lagoon where the mussel farm in which the field experimental procedure was conducted is located. Coordinates: 39.025628318910435, 20.7571601812546.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Longline and raft mussel farm installation located close to the Mazoma Lagoon (northwest coast of Amvrakikos Gulf) (<b>A</b>); where mussel socks were placed (<b>B</b>). Mussel socks before (<b>C</b>) and after (<b>D</b>) the washing with sea water and/or air exposure; (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>) were obtained after transferring the mussels to a sunny place in order for them to be better displayed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Schematic representation of experiment 1 in the four different groups of mussel socks (a–d), as described in the <a href="#sec2dot3-fishes-09-00135" class="html-sec">Section 2.3</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Schematic representation of the experimental protocol employing sea water tanks of different salinities and different immersion times of mussels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Schematic representation of experiment 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Seasonal variations in sea water temperature, oxygen and Chl-α concentration in the Mazoma Lagoon mussel farm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Fifteen-day washing effect for a period of 5 months on the number of ascidian colonies of the mussel socks. Values are mean ± S.D. of <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 4. Lower case letters denote statistically significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05) between different time periods of intervention, while asterisks (*) denote statistically significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05) between control and treated mussels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Thirty-day washing (<b>A</b>), air exposure (<b>B</b>), combination of washing and air exposure effect (<b>C</b>) and comparison between all treatments (<b>D</b>) for a period of five months on the number of ascidian colonies of the mussel socks. Values are mean ± S.D. of <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 4. Lower case letters denote statistically significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05) between different time periods of intervention, asterisks (*) denote statistically significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05) between control and treated mussel socks, and carets (^) denote statistically significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05) between different treatments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Effect of immersion in 50 and 70 ppt sea water for 3 and 5 min and exposure to air on the number (<b>A</b>) and the (<b>B</b>) % maintenance of ascidian colonies on the mussel socks. Values are mean ± S.D. of <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 4. Asterisks (*) denote statistically significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05) between control and treated mussel socks and carets (^) denote statistically significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05) before and after treatment (<b>A</b>) and between different time exposures (3 and 5 min) (<b>B</b>).</p>
Full article ">
8 pages, 29126 KiB  
Interesting Images
Unique Aggregations of a Large Undescribed Solitary Tunicate in the Arabian Sea
by Kaveh Samimi-Namin, Tito Monteiro da Cruz Lotufo, Bert W. Hoeksema, Sarah M. Tweedt, Christopher Meyer and Gustav Paulay
Diversity 2024, 16(4), 221; https://doi.org/10.3390/d16040221 - 6 Apr 2024
Viewed by 1882
Abstract
We document aggregations of an undescribed benthic solitary tunicate of the family Pyuridae from the Arabian Sea. This new genus was found forming dense thickets in shallow rocky substrates around Masirah Island and the Dhofar area in Oman. Such aggregations of tunicates have [...] Read more.
We document aggregations of an undescribed benthic solitary tunicate of the family Pyuridae from the Arabian Sea. This new genus was found forming dense thickets in shallow rocky substrates around Masirah Island and the Dhofar area in Oman. Such aggregations of tunicates have not been reported before from coral reefs in the Indo-West Pacific region and the Atlantic. This observation contributes to our understanding of the ecology and biogeography of ascidians, setting the stage for a comprehensive species description and in-depth analysis of this species. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Interesting Images from the Sea)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Locations where the undescribed pyurid tunicate species was observed along the Omani coast and around Masirah Island (red dots). Blue shading represents depth gradients.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Dense aggregations of the undescribed pyurid tunicate species around Masirah Island, Oman. Scales = 10 cm. Note overgrowth by other organisms. (<b>A</b>) Individuals at the north of the island at 5 m depth. (<b>B</b>) Individuals at the southwest of the island at 10 m depth. (<b>C</b>) Close-up of an individual animal.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) Tunic remaining from individual attached by putative predator; note the absence of the orange tunicate body and remaining white tunic (hatched rectangle). (<b>C</b>) Remnant of an individual, most likely removed by predation. (<b>D</b>) Space left on rock by several individuals that appear to have been recently removed judging by the clean, vacant surface. (<b>E</b>) The individual without its thick tunic. (<b>F</b>) Cross-section of the individual with the body separated, scale = 5 cm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Anatomical section of the preserved specimen of the undescribed pyurid tunicate species from Oman. (<b>A</b>) Cross-section of the individual, arrow pointing at the body wall, scale = 2 cm. (<b>B</b>) Dissected pharynx and body, hatched rectangles, representing (<b>C</b>–<b>F</b>) macro images, scale = 1 cm. (<b>C</b>) Endocarps. (<b>D</b>) Pharynx wall with folds, showing longitudinal vessels and 2nd, 3rd, and 4th folds. (<b>E</b>) External view of the oral siphon and oral tentacles. (<b>F</b>) Internal view of the oral siphon and oral tentacles.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop