[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (32)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = amphotericin B resistance in C. auris

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
11 pages, 288 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Etest and MICRONAUT-AM Assay for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Candida auris: Underestimation of Fluconazole Resistance by MICRONAUT-AM and Overestimation of Amphotericin B Resistance by Etest
by Mohammad Asadzadeh, Suhail Ahmad, Wadha Alfouzan, Inaam Al-Obaid, Bram Spruijtenburg, Eelco F. J. Meijer, Jacques F. Meis and Eiman Mokaddas
Antibiotics 2024, 13(9), 840; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13090840 - 4 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1188
Abstract
Multidrug-resistant Candida auris has recently caused major outbreaks in healthcare facilities. Rapid and accurate antifungal susceptibility testing (AST) of C. auris is crucial for proper management of invasive infections. The Commercial Sensititre Yeast One and Vitek 2 methods underestimate or overestimate the resistance [...] Read more.
Multidrug-resistant Candida auris has recently caused major outbreaks in healthcare facilities. Rapid and accurate antifungal susceptibility testing (AST) of C. auris is crucial for proper management of invasive infections. The Commercial Sensititre Yeast One and Vitek 2 methods underestimate or overestimate the resistance of C. auris to fluconazole and amphotericin B (AMB). This study evaluated the AST results of C. auris against fluconazole and AMB by gradient-MIC-strip (Etest) and broth microdilution-based MICRONAUT-AM-EUCAST (MCN-AM) assays. Clinical C. auris isolates (n = 121) identified by phenotypic and molecular methods were tested. Essential agreement (EA, ±1 two-fold dilution) between the two methods and categorical agreement (CA) based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC’s) tentative resistance breakpoints were determined. Fluconazole resistance-associated mutations were detected by PCR-sequencing of ERG11. All isolates identified as C. auris belonged to South Asian clade I and contained the ERG11 Y132F or K143R mutation. The Etest–MCN-AM EA was poor (33%) for fluconazole and moderate (76%) for AMB. The CA for fluconazole was higher (94.2%, 7 discrepancies) than for AMB (91.7%, 10 discrepancies). Discrepancies were reduced when an MCN-AM upper-limit value of 4 µg/mL for fluconazole-susceptible C. auris and an Etest upper-limit value of 8 µg/mL for the wild type for AMB were used. Our data show that resistance to fluconazole was underestimated by MCN-AM, while resistance to AMB was overestimated by Etest when using the CDC’s tentative resistance breakpoints of ≥32 µg/mL for fluconazole and ≥2 µg/mL for AMB. Method-specific resistance breakpoints should be devised for accurate AST of clinical C. auris isolates for proper patient management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Epidemiology, Antifungal Resistance and Therapy in Fungal Infection)
15 pages, 1620 KiB  
Article
Potential Activity of Micafungin and Amphotericin B Co-Encapsulated in Nanoemulsion against Systemic Candida auris Infection in a Mice Model
by Gabriel Davi Marena, Gabriela Corrêa Carvalho, Alba Ruiz-Gaitán, Giovana Scaramal Onisto, Beatriz Chiari Manzini Bugalho, Letícia Maria Valente Genezini, Maíra Oliveira Dos Santos, Ana Lígia Blanco, Marlus Chorilli and Tais Maria Bauab
J. Fungi 2024, 10(4), 253; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10040253 - 27 Mar 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1593
Abstract
The Candida auris species is a multidrug-resistant yeast capable of causing systemic and lethal infections. Its virulence and increase in outbreaks are a global concern, especially in hospitals where outbreaks are more recurrent. In many cases, monotherapy is not effective, and drug combinations [...] Read more.
The Candida auris species is a multidrug-resistant yeast capable of causing systemic and lethal infections. Its virulence and increase in outbreaks are a global concern, especially in hospitals where outbreaks are more recurrent. In many cases, monotherapy is not effective, and drug combinations are opted for. However, resistance to antifungals has increased over the years. In view of this, nanoemulsions (NEs) may represent a nanotechnology strategy in the development of new therapeutic alternatives. Therefore, this study developed a co-encapsulated nanoemulsion with amphotericin B (AmB) and micafungin (MICA) (NEMA) for the control of infections caused by C. auris. NEs were developed in previous studies. Briefly, the NEs were composed of a mixture of 10% sunflower oil and cholesterol as the oil phase (5:1), 10% Polyoxyethylene (20) cetyl ether (Brij® 58) and soy phosphatidylcholine as surfactant/co-surfactant (2:1), and 80% PBS as the aqueous phase. The in vivo assay used BALB/c mice weighing between 25 and 28 g that were immunosuppressed (CEUA/FCF/CAr n° 29/2021) and infected with Candida auris CDC B11903. The in vivo results show the surprising potentiate of the antifungal activity of the co-encapsulated drugs in NE, preventing yeast from causing infection in the lung and thymus. Biochemical assays showed a higher concentration of liver and kidney enzymes under treatment with AmB and MICAmB. In conclusion, this combination of drugs to combat the infection caused by C. auris can be considered an efficient therapeutic option, and nanoemulsions contribute to therapeutic potentiate, proving to be a promising new alternative. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Alternative Therapeutic Approaches of Candida Infections, 3rd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Determination of the antifungal potential of AmB and NEA in mice infected with <span class="html-italic">C. auris.</span> Legend: IC: Infection control (infection + saline); NE: control infection with nanoemulsion without the drug (infection + NE); NEA: nanoemulsion + amphotericin B; AmB: amphotericin B. (<b>A</b>): liver; (<b>B</b>): spleen; (<b>C</b>): kidneys; (<b>D</b>): thymus; (<b>E</b>): lung. <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 (*); <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.005 (**); <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001 (***), <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0001 (****).</p>
Full article ">Figure 1 Cont.
<p>Determination of the antifungal potential of AmB and NEA in mice infected with <span class="html-italic">C. auris.</span> Legend: IC: Infection control (infection + saline); NE: control infection with nanoemulsion without the drug (infection + NE); NEA: nanoemulsion + amphotericin B; AmB: amphotericin B. (<b>A</b>): liver; (<b>B</b>): spleen; (<b>C</b>): kidneys; (<b>D</b>): thymus; (<b>E</b>): lung. <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 (*); <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.005 (**); <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001 (***), <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0001 (****).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Determination of the antifungal potential of MICA and NEM in mice infected with <span class="html-italic">C. auris.</span> Legend: IC: Infection control (infection + saline); NE: control infection with nanoemulsion without the drug (infection + NE); NEM: nanoemulsion + micafungin; MICA: micafungin. (<b>A</b>): liver; (<b>B</b>): spleen; (<b>C</b>): kidneys; (<b>D</b>): thymus; (<b>E</b>): lung. <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 (*); <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.005 (**); <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0001 (****).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2 Cont.
<p>Determination of the antifungal potential of MICA and NEM in mice infected with <span class="html-italic">C. auris.</span> Legend: IC: Infection control (infection + saline); NE: control infection with nanoemulsion without the drug (infection + NE); NEM: nanoemulsion + micafungin; MICA: micafungin. (<b>A</b>): liver; (<b>B</b>): spleen; (<b>C</b>): kidneys; (<b>D</b>): thymus; (<b>E</b>): lung. <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 (*); <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.005 (**); <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0001 (****).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Determination of the antifungal potential of MICAmB and NEMA in mice infected with <span class="html-italic">C. auris.</span> Legend: IC: Infection control (infection + saline); NE: control infection with nanoemulsion without the drug (infection + NE); NEMA: nanoemulsion + micafungin + amphotericin B; MICAmB: micafungin + amphotericin B. (<b>A</b>): liver; (<b>B</b>): spleen; (<b>C</b>): kidneys; (<b>D</b>): thymus; (<b>E</b>): lung. <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.005 (**); <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0001 (****).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3 Cont.
<p>Determination of the antifungal potential of MICAmB and NEMA in mice infected with <span class="html-italic">C. auris.</span> Legend: IC: Infection control (infection + saline); NE: control infection with nanoemulsion without the drug (infection + NE); NEMA: nanoemulsion + micafungin + amphotericin B; MICAmB: micafungin + amphotericin B. (<b>A</b>): liver; (<b>B</b>): spleen; (<b>C</b>): kidneys; (<b>D</b>): thymus; (<b>E</b>): lung. <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.005 (**); <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0001 (****).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Determination of liver and kidney enzyme concentration in infected and treated mice. Legend: GOT: glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase; PGT: glutamic pyruvic transaminase; CRE: creatinine; NEA: nanoemulsion + amphotericin B; NEM: nanoemulsion + micafungin; NEMA: nanoemulsion + micafungin + amphotericin B; AmB: Amphotericin B; MICA: Micafungin; MICAmB: Micafungin + amphotericin B; control: infected mice without treatment; <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 (*); <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.005 (**).</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 1336 KiB  
Systematic Review
Candida auris Infection, a Rapidly Emerging Threat in the Neonatal Intensive Care Units: A Systematic Review
by Rozeta Sokou, Alexia Eleftheria Palioura, Paschalia Kopanou Taliaka, Aikaterini Konstantinidi, Andreas G. Tsantes, Daniele Piovani, Konstantina A. Tsante, Eleni A. Gounari, Zoi Iliodromiti, Theodora Boutsikou, Argirios E. Tsantes, Stefanos Bonovas and Nicoletta Iacovidou
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(6), 1586; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13061586 - 10 Mar 2024
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 3180
Abstract
(1) Background: In recent years, a global epidemiological shift in candidemia has been observed, marked by the emergence of resistant non-albicans Candida species. Candida auris, in particular, has become a significant global concern, causing infections in both pediatric and adult populations within [...] Read more.
(1) Background: In recent years, a global epidemiological shift in candidemia has been observed, marked by the emergence of resistant non-albicans Candida species. Candida auris, in particular, has become a significant global concern, causing infections in both pediatric and adult populations within healthcare settings. Despite its widespread impact, there is a limited understanding of the clinical course and transmission dynamics of neonatal systemic Candida auris infections, hindering effective prevention and management. This study focused on the epidemiologic data, the clinical presentation, risk factors, and outcome of C. auris infection in neonatal population. (2) Methods: A systematic review of the literature using PubMed and Scopus databases until December 2023 was conducted. (3) Results: A total of 24 relevant studies were identified, encompassing 476 documented cases of Candida auris infection in neonates. Prematurity emerged as a primary risk factor, alongside total parenteral nutrition, central line insertion, mechanical ventilation, and prior broad-spectrum antibiotic use. The mortality rate reached approximately 42%, with therapeutic details sparingly reported in 12% of cases. Treatment strategies varied, with amphotericin B predominantly used as monotherapy, while combination antifungal agents were used in 44% of cases. Notably, 97.4% of cases exhibited fluconazole resistance, and 67.1% showed resistance to amphotericin B. Limited data were available on resistance to other antifungal agents. (4) Conclusions: Despite the rarity of neonatal Candida auris infections, their global occurrence necessitates comprehensive preparedness in patient care. A deeper understanding of Candida auris pathogenesis is crucial for developing effective strategies to control and prevent neonatal infections caused by this pathogen. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Pediatrics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flowchart of the systematic review.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Map of countries where cases of <span class="html-italic">Candida auris</span> infection were documented in neonatal population.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 2868 KiB  
Article
Associations between Genomic Variants and Antifungal Susceptibilities in the Archived Global Candida auris Population
by Yue Wang and Jianping Xu
J. Fungi 2024, 10(1), 86; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10010086 - 22 Jan 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2831
Abstract
Candida auris is a recently emerged human fungal pathogen that has posed a significant threat to public health. Since its first identification in 2009, this fungus has caused nosocomial infections in over 47 countries across all inhabited continents. As of May 2023, the [...] Read more.
Candida auris is a recently emerged human fungal pathogen that has posed a significant threat to public health. Since its first identification in 2009, this fungus has caused nosocomial infections in over 47 countries across all inhabited continents. As of May 2023, the whole-genome sequences of over 4000 strains have been reported and a diversity of mutations, including in genes known to be associated with drug resistance in other human fungal pathogens, have been described. Among them, 387 strains contained antifungal-susceptibility information for which different methods might be used depending on the drugs and/or investigators. In most reports on C. auris so far, the number of strains analyzed was very small, from one to a few dozen, and the statistical significance of the relationships between these genetic variants and their antifungal susceptibilities could not be assessed. In this study, we conducted genome-wide association studies on individual clades based on previously published C. auris isolates to investigate the statistical association between genomic variants and susceptibility differences to nine antifungal drugs belonging to four major drug categories: 5-fluorocytosine, amphotericin B, fluconazole, voriconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole, anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin. Due to the small sample sizes for Clades II, V, and VI, this study only assessed Clades I, III, and IV. Our analyses revealed 15 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in Clade I (10 in coding and 5 in noncoding regions), 24 SNPs in Clade III (11 in coding and 13 in noncoding regions), and 13 SNPs in clade IV (10 in coding and 3 in noncoding regions) as statistically significantly associated with susceptibility differences to one or more of the nine antifungal drugs. While four SNPs in genes encoding lanosterol 14-α-demethylase (ERG11) and the catalytic subunit of 1,3-beta-D-glucan synthase (FKS1) were shared between clades, including the experimentally confirmed Ser639Phe/Pro missense substitutions in FKS1 for echinocandin resistance, most of the identified SNPs were clade specific, consistent with their recent independent origins. Interestingly, the majority of the antifungal resistance-associated SNPs were novel, and in genes and intergenic regions that have never been reported before as associated with antifungal resistance. While targeted study is needed to confirm the role of each novel SNP, the diverse mechanisms of drug resistance in C. auris revealed here indicate both challenges for infection control and opportunities for the development of novel antifungal drugs against this and other human fungal pathogens. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Perspectives for Candidiasis 2.0)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Histograms depicting the distributions of MICs (μg/mL) among strains for each clade against different drugs. Y-axis depicts the counts while x-axis depicts the MIC values, with 10<sup>−2</sup>, 10<sup>−1</sup>, 10<sup>0</sup>, 10<sup>1</sup>, and 10<sup>2</sup> on the x-axis being equivalent to 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, and 100 μg/mL.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>QQ plots and Manhattan plots showing genome-wide SNPs associated with antifungal-susceptibility differences among strains within Clade I. The left panel displays the QQ plots for five GWAS analyses, while the right panel presents the Manhattan plots. Plots are arranged from top to bottom in the following order: FLU, AMB, CAS, MFG, and AFG. The QQ plots display the expected −log10 (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value) on the X-axis and the observed −log10 (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value) on the Y-axis. The Manhattan plots are depicted with scaffold position on the X-axis and the −log10 (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value) on the Y-axis. The significant <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value threshold for the SNPs is represented by green lines on the Manhattan plots.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>QQ plots and Manhattan plots showing genome-wide SNPs associated with antifungal-susceptibility differences among strains within Clade III. The left panel displays the QQ plots for five GWAS analyses, while the right panel presents the Manhattan plots. Plots are arranged from top to bottom in the following order: FLU, CAS (FarmCPU; BLINK), MFG (FarmCPU; BLINK), and AFG (FarmCPU; BLINK). The QQ plots display the expected −log10 (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value) on the X-axis and the observed −log10 (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value) on the Y-axis. The Manhattan plots are depicted with scaffold position on the X-axis and the −log10 (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value) on the Y-axis. The significant <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value threshold for the SNPs is represented by green lines on the Manhattan plots.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>QQ plots and Manhattan plots showing genome-wide SNPs associated with antifungal-susceptibility differences among strains within Clade IV. The left panel displays the QQ plots for three GWAS analyses, while the right panel presents the Manhattan plots. Plots are arranged from top to bottom in the following order: VOR, CAS (FarmCPU; BLINK), and MFG. The QQ plots display the expected −log10 (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value) on the X-axis and the observed −log10 (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value) on the Y-axis. The Manhattan plots are depicted with scaffold position on the X-axis and the −log10 (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value) on the Y-axis. The significant <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value threshold for the SNPs is represented by green lines on the Manhattan plots.</p>
Full article ">
33 pages, 2457 KiB  
Review
Molecular Mechanisms Associated with Antifungal Resistance in Pathogenic Candida Species
by Karolina M. Czajka, Krishnan Venkataraman, Danielle Brabant-Kirwan, Stacey A. Santi, Chris Verschoor, Vasu D. Appanna, Ravi Singh, Deborah P. Saunders and Sujeenthar Tharmalingam
Cells 2023, 12(22), 2655; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12222655 - 19 Nov 2023
Cited by 25 | Viewed by 8030
Abstract
Candidiasis is a highly pervasive infection posing major health risks, especially for immunocompromised populations. Pathogenic Candida species have evolved intrinsic and acquired resistance to a variety of antifungal medications. The primary goal of this literature review is to summarize the molecular mechanisms associated [...] Read more.
Candidiasis is a highly pervasive infection posing major health risks, especially for immunocompromised populations. Pathogenic Candida species have evolved intrinsic and acquired resistance to a variety of antifungal medications. The primary goal of this literature review is to summarize the molecular mechanisms associated with antifungal resistance in Candida species. Resistance can be conferred via gain-of-function mutations in target pathway genes or their transcriptional regulators. Therefore, an overview of the known gene mutations is presented for the following antifungals: azoles (fluconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole and itraconazole), echinocandins (caspofungin, anidulafungin and micafungin), polyenes (amphotericin B and nystatin) and 5-fluorocytosine (5-FC). The following mutation hot spots were identified: (1) ergosterol biosynthesis pathway mutations (ERG11 and UPC2), resulting in azole resistance; (2) overexpression of the efflux pumps, promoting azole resistance (transcription factor genes: tac1 and mrr1; transporter genes: CDR1, CDR2, MDR1, PDR16 and SNQ2); (3) cell wall biosynthesis mutations (FKS1, FKS2 and PDR1), conferring resistance to echinocandins; (4) mutations of nucleic acid synthesis/repair genes (FCY1, FCY2 and FUR1), resulting in 5-FC resistance; and (5) biofilm production, promoting general antifungal resistance. This review also provides a summary of standardized inhibitory breakpoints obtained from international guidelines for prominent Candida species. Notably, N. glabrata, P. kudriavzevii and C. auris demonstrate fluconazole resistance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fungal Infections and Resistance)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Mechanisms of antifungal action for the four main drug types. (1) <b>Azoles</b> bind to and inhibit the Erg11 enzyme and subsequent ergosterol production. (2) <b>Polyenes</b> bind to ergosterol and induce the formation of cell membrane pores, which cause intracellular ion leakage. (3) <b>Echinocandins</b> bind to and inhibit beta-glucan synthase, which disrupts cell wall architecture. (4) <b>Nucleoside analogues</b> are incorporated into nucleic acid molecules and disrupt DNA/RNA biosynthesis (created with <a href="http://BioRender.com" target="_blank">BioRender.com</a>, accessed on 16 October 2023).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The key points for each of the four antifungal drug types with the chemical structures of members from each class. All drug structure images were obtained from <span class="html-italic">Wikimedia Commons</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Genes associated with antifungal resistance in drug target pathways: (1) ergosterol biosynthesis, (2) cell membrane, (3) cell wall biosynthesis and (4) DNA/RNA biosynthesis (created with <a href="http://BioRender.com" target="_blank">BioRender.com</a>, accessed on 16 October 2023).</p>
Full article ">
10 pages, 1594 KiB  
Communication
An Autochthonous Susceptible Candida auris Clade I Otomycosis Case in Iran
by Bahram Ahmadi, Behrouz Naeimi, Mohammad Javad Ahmadipour, Hamid Morovati, Theun de Groot, Bram Spruijtenburg, Hamid Badali and Jacques F. Meis
J. Fungi 2023, 9(11), 1101; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9111101 - 11 Nov 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1872
Abstract
Candida auris is a newly emerging multidrug-resistant fungal pathogen considered to be a serious global health threat. Due to diagnostic challenges, there is no precise estimate for the prevalence rate of this pathogen in Iran. Since 2019, only six culture-proven C. auris cases [...] Read more.
Candida auris is a newly emerging multidrug-resistant fungal pathogen considered to be a serious global health threat. Due to diagnostic challenges, there is no precise estimate for the prevalence rate of this pathogen in Iran. Since 2019, only six culture-proven C. auris cases have been reported from Iran, of which, five belonged to clade V and one to clade I. Herein, we report a case of otomycosis due to C. auris from 2017 in a 78-year-old man with diabetes mellitus type II without an epidemiological link to other cases or travel history. Short tandem repeat genotyping and whole genome sequencing (WGS) analysis revealed that this isolate belonged to clade I of C. auris (South Asian Clade). The WGS single nucleotide polymorphism calling demonstrated that the C. auris isolate from 2017 is not related to a previously reported clade I isolate from Iran. The presence of this retrospectively recognized clade I isolate also suggests an early introduction from other regions or an autochthonous presence. Although the majority of reported C. auris isolates worldwide are resistant to fluconazole and, to a lesser extent, to echinocandins and amphotericin B, the reported clade I isolate from Iran was susceptible to all antifungal drugs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genomic Epidemiology of Fungal Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Short tandem repeat (STR) typing of <span class="html-italic">Candida auris</span> isolates including the current isolate. The UPGMA dendrogram was generated with BioNumerics v7.6, branch lengths indicate similarity, and the currently reported isolate is indicated in bold.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Phylogenetic tree based on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of 29 <span class="html-italic">Candida auris</span> isolates including all reported clades. Numbers below the branch indicate the number of SNPs. The tree was generated with MEGA11 using the neighbor-joining tree method.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 1103 KiB  
Article
Virulence Traits and Azole Resistance in Korean Candida auris Isolates
by Seung A. Byun, Yong Jun Kwon, Ga Yeong Lee, Min Ji Choi, Seok Hoon Jeong, Dokyun Kim, Min Hyuk Choi, Seung-Jung Kee, Soo Hyun Kim, Myung Geun Shin, Eun Jeong Won and Jong Hee Shin
J. Fungi 2023, 9(10), 979; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9100979 - 28 Sep 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1792
Abstract
We analyzed the virulence traits and azole resistance mechanisms of 104 Candida auris isolates collected from 13 Korean hospitals from 1996 to 2022. Of these 104 isolates, 96 (5 blood and 91 ear isolates) belonged to clade II, and 8 (6 blood and [...] Read more.
We analyzed the virulence traits and azole resistance mechanisms of 104 Candida auris isolates collected from 13 Korean hospitals from 1996 to 2022. Of these 104 isolates, 96 (5 blood and 91 ear isolates) belonged to clade II, and 8 (6 blood and 2 other isolates) belonged to clade I. Fluconazole resistance (minimum inhibitory concentration ≥32 mg/L) was observed in 68.8% of clade II and 25.0% of clade I isolates. All 104 isolates were susceptible to amphotericin B and three echinocandins. In 2022, six clade I isolates indicated the first nosocomial C. auris cluster in Korea. Clade II C. auris isolates exhibited reduced thermotolerance at 42 °C, with diminished in vitro competitive growth and lower virulence in the Galleria mellonella model compared to non-clade II isolates. Of the 66 fluconazole-resistant clade II isolates, several amino acid substitutions were identified: Erg11p in 14 (21.2%), Tac1Ap in 2 (3.0%), Tac1Bp in 62 (93.9%), and Tac1Bp F214S in 33 (50.0%). Although there were a limited number of non-clade II isolates studied, our results suggest that clade II C. auris isolates from Korean hospitals might display lower virulence traits than non-clade II isolates, and their primary fluconazole resistance mechanism is linked to Tac1Bp mutations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Invasive Candidiasis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Kinetic growth curves at 42 °C for 97 clade II isolates (96 Korean and 1 CDC isolate) (blue bars) and 17 non-clade II isolates (8 clade I Korean and 9 non-clade II CDC isolates) (red bars) of <span class="html-italic">C. auris</span>. These data were obtained following the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing method, but with an incubation temperature of 42 °C.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>A</b>) Biofilm formation in <span class="html-italic">C. auris</span> clinical isolates (clades I and II) from Korea in addition to non-clade II CDC-FDA isolates. (<b>B</b>) Biofilm formation in <span class="html-italic">C. auris</span> clinical isolates from Korean hospitals compared to those of closely related species, assessed using an XTT assay. Abbreviations: <span class="html-italic">C. pseudo.</span>, <span class="html-italic">C. pseudohaemulonii</span>; <span class="html-italic">C. haemul.</span>, <span class="html-italic">C. haemulonii</span> complex.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>A</b>) In vivo virulence of <span class="html-italic">C. auris</span> clinical isolates (clades I and II) compared to those of closely related species, assessed using the <span class="html-italic">Galleria mellonella</span> infection model. (<b>B</b>) Competitive growth index of <span class="html-italic">C. auris</span> isolates obtained after 24 h of co-culture in a 1:1 ratio with the <span class="html-italic">Candida albicans</span> SC5314 strain at 35 °C. Abbreviations: PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; <span class="html-italic">C. pseudo.</span>, <span class="html-italic">C. pseudohaemulonii</span>; <span class="html-italic">C. haemul.</span>, <span class="html-italic">C. haemulonii</span> complex.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 3684 KiB  
Article
Invasive Candidiasis in Adult Patients with COVID-19: Results of a Multicenter Study in St. Petersburg, Russia
by Olga Kozlova, Ekaterina Burygina, Sofya Khostelidi, Olga Shadrivova, Andrey Saturnov, Denis Gusev, Aleksandr Rysev, Anatoliy Zavrazhnov, Maria Vashukova, Galina Pichugina, Mikhail Mitichkin, Sergey Kovyrshin, Tatiana Bogomolova, Yulia Borzova, Ellina Oganesyan, Natalya Vasilyeva, Nikolay Klimko and Working Group
J. Fungi 2023, 9(9), 927; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9090927 - 14 Sep 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 1741
Abstract
We studied the risk factors, etiology, clinical manifestations, and treatment outcomes of COVID-19-associated invasive candidiasis (COVID-IC) in adult patients admitted to six medical facilities in St. Petersburg. (November 2020–December 2022). In this retrospective study, we included 72 patients with COVID-IC with a median [...] Read more.
We studied the risk factors, etiology, clinical manifestations, and treatment outcomes of COVID-19-associated invasive candidiasis (COVID-IC) in adult patients admitted to six medical facilities in St. Petersburg. (November 2020–December 2022). In this retrospective study, we included 72 patients with COVID-IC with a median age of 61 years (range 29–96), 51% of whom were women. The predisposing factors for COVID-IC were a central venous catheter (CVC) for more than 10 days (the odds ratio (OR) = 70 [15–309]), abdominal surgical treatment performed in the previous 2 weeks (OR = 8.8 [1.9–40.3]), bacteremia (OR = 10.6 [4.8–23.3]), pulmonary ventilation (OR = 12.9 [5.9–28.4]), and hemodialysis (OR = 11.5 [2.5–50.8]). The signs and symptoms of COVID-IC were non-specific: fever (59%), renal failure (33%), liver failure (23%), and cardiovascular failure (10%). Candida albicans (41%) predominated among the pathogens of the candidemia. The multidrug-resistant Candida species C. auris (23%) and C. glabrata (5%) were also identified. Empirical therapy was used in 21% of COVID-IC patients: azole-93%, echinocandin–7%. The majority of COVID-IC patients (79%) received, after laboratory confirmation of the diagnosis of IC, fluconazole (47%), voriconazole (25%), echinocandin (26%), and amphotericin B (2)%. The 30 days overall survival rate was 45%. The prognosis worsened concomitant bacteremia, hemodialysis, and long-term therapy by systemic glucocorticosteroids (SGCs), bronchial colonization with Candida spp. The survival prognosis was improved by the early change/replacement of CVC (within 24 h), the initiation of empirical therapy, and the use of echinocandin. Conclusions: We highlighted the risk factors that predispose COVID-19 patients to candidiasis and worsen the survival prognosis. Their individual effects in patients with COVID-19 must be well understood to prevent the development of opportunistic co-infections that drastically lower chances of survival. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fungal Infections in COVID-19 Patients)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Frequency of comorbidities in the COVID-IC and COVID without IC groups (* <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0001). HIV—human immunodeficiency virus; COPD—chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Risk factors for COVID-IC (* OR &gt; 1).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Clinical manifestations of COVID-IC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Antifungal therapy in the study and control groups.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The influence of various factors on survival rate of patients with COVID-IC: (<b>A</b>) bronchial colonization by fungi of the genus <span class="html-italic">Candida</span>; (<b>B</b>) <span class="html-italic">C. auris</span> and non-<span class="html-italic">C. auris</span> infection; (<b>C</b>) concomitant bacteremia; (<b>D</b>) hemodialysis; (<b>E</b>) empirical therapy; (<b>F</b>) use of echinocandin; (<b>G</b>) change of central venous catheter; (<b>H</b>) initiation of the antifungal therapy.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5 Cont.
<p>The influence of various factors on survival rate of patients with COVID-IC: (<b>A</b>) bronchial colonization by fungi of the genus <span class="html-italic">Candida</span>; (<b>B</b>) <span class="html-italic">C. auris</span> and non-<span class="html-italic">C. auris</span> infection; (<b>C</b>) concomitant bacteremia; (<b>D</b>) hemodialysis; (<b>E</b>) empirical therapy; (<b>F</b>) use of echinocandin; (<b>G</b>) change of central venous catheter; (<b>H</b>) initiation of the antifungal therapy.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 3690 KiB  
Review
An Overview on Candida auris in Healthcare Settings
by Maria Luisa Cristina, Anna Maria Spagnolo, Marina Sartini, Alessio Carbone, Martino Oliva, Elisa Schinca, Silvia Boni and Emanuele Pontali
J. Fungi 2023, 9(9), 913; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9090913 - 8 Sep 2023
Cited by 21 | Viewed by 4634
Abstract
Candida auris has become a major concern in critical care medicine due to the increasing number of immunocompromised patients and candidiasis is the most frequent cause of fungal infections. C. auris and other fungal pathogens are responsible for at least 13 million infections [...] Read more.
Candida auris has become a major concern in critical care medicine due to the increasing number of immunocompromised patients and candidiasis is the most frequent cause of fungal infections. C. auris and other fungal pathogens are responsible for at least 13 million infections and 1.5 million deaths globally per year. In immunocompromised patients, infections can quickly become severe, causing wound infections, otitis and candidemia, resulting in high morbidity and mortality. The clinical presentation of C. auris is often non-specific and similar to other types of systemic infections; in addition, it is harder to identify from cultures than other, more common types of Candida spp. Some infections are particularly difficult to treat due to multi-resistance to several antifungal agents, including fluconazole (and other azoles), amphotericin B and echinocandins. This entails treatment with more drugs and at higher doses. Even after treatment for invasive infections, patients generally remain colonized for long periods, so all infection control measures must be followed during and after treatment of the C. auris infection. Screening patients for C. auris colonization enables facilities to identify individuals with C. auris colonization and to implement infection prevention and control measures. This pathogenic fungus shows an innate resilience, enabling survival and persistence in healthcare environment and the ability to rapidly colonize the patient’s skin and be easily transmitted within the healthcare setting, thus leading to a serious and prolonged outbreak. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Patterns in Epidemiology and Antifungal Resistance)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Morphology of cells of the microbial organism <span class="html-italic">C. auris</span> (Stephanie Rossow/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention—<a href="https://phil.cdc.gov/Details.aspx?pid=23239" target="_blank">https://phil.cdc.gov/Details.aspx?pid=23239</a>, accessed on 13 February 2023).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flowchart of recommendations for treatment of <span class="html-italic">C. auris</span> infections ([<a href="#B33-jof-09-00913" class="html-bibr">33</a>], modified).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Reported cases of <span class="html-italic">C. auris</span> infection or carriage in thirty EU/EEA countries, 2013–2021 ([<a href="#B45-jof-09-00913" class="html-bibr">45</a>], modified).</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 3066 KiB  
Article
Nanoemulsion Increases the Antifungal Activity of Amphotericin B against Four Candida auris Clades: In Vitro and In Vivo Assays
by Gabriel Davi Marena, Alba Ruiz-Gaitán, Victor Garcia-Bustos, María Ángeles Tormo-Mas, Jose Manuel Pérez-Royo, Alejandro López, Patricia Bernarbe, María Dolores Pérez Ruiz, Lara Zaragoza Macian, Carmen Vicente Saez, Antonia Avalos Mansilla, Eulogio Valentín Gómez, Gabriela Corrêa Carvalho, Tais Maria Bauab, Marlus Chorilli and Javier Pemán
Microorganisms 2023, 11(7), 1626; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11071626 - 21 Jun 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 1712
Abstract
Candida auris is an emerging yeast of worldwide interest due to its antifungal resistance and mortality rates. The aim of this study was to analyse the in vitro and in vivo antifungal activity of a nanoemulsion loaded with amphotericin B (NEA) against planktonic [...] Read more.
Candida auris is an emerging yeast of worldwide interest due to its antifungal resistance and mortality rates. The aim of this study was to analyse the in vitro and in vivo antifungal activity of a nanoemulsion loaded with amphotericin B (NEA) against planktonic cells and biofilm of C. auris clinical isolates belonging to four different clades. In vivo assays were performed using the Galleria mellonella model to analyse antifungal activity and histopathological changes. The in vitro results showed that NEA exhibited better antifungal activity than free amphotericin B (AmB) in both planktonic and sessile cells, with >31% inhibition of mature biofilm. In the in vivo assays, NEA demonstrated superior antifungal activity in both haemolymph and tissue. NEA reduced the fungal load in the haemolymph more rapidly and with more activity in the first 24 h after infection. The histological analysis of infected larvae revealed clusters of yeast, immune cells, melanisation, and granulomas. In conclusion, NEA significantly improved the in vitro and in vivo antifungal activity of AmB and could be considered a promising therapy for C. auris infections. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Activity of NEA and AmB against <span class="html-italic">C. auris</span> biofilm formation. NEA: nanoemulsion + amphotericin B; NE: nanoemulsion; S: solvent (DMSO 5% + YEPD); CC: growth control; AmB: amphotericin B. <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values &lt; 0.0001 (****), <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.002 (**), and <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01 (*). Black (****) indicates the difference between the treated group (AmB or NEA) and the control group (growth control, S, and NE). Red (****) indicates a statistically significant difference between treatments (NEA and AmB, respectively).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Activity of AmB and NEA in mature biofilms of <span class="html-italic">C. auris</span>. NEA: nanoemulsion + amphotericin B; NE: nanoemulsion; S: solvent (DMSO 5% + YEPD); CC: growth control; AmB: amphotericin B. <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values &lt; 0.0001 (****), <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.003 (***), <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.002 (**), and <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01 (*). Black (****) indicates the difference between the treated group (AmB or NEA) compared to the control group (growth control, S, and NE). Red (****) indicates a statistical difference between the treatments (NEA and AmB).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Antifungal activity of NEA and AmB in the haemolymph of <span class="html-italic">G. mellonella</span> infected with <span class="html-italic">C. auris</span>. NEA: nanoemulsion + amphotericin B; AmB: amphotericin B; PBS + AmP: phosphate-buffered saline + ampicillin (20 µg/mL) with infection; NE: nanoemulsion with infection. NE and PBS + AmP: considered control groups (without therapy); the presence of letters indicates statistical difference between the infection control group (PBS + AmP or NE) and the treated group (AmB and NEA). Time 0 indicates the fungal load after 2 h of infection.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Quantification of the fungal load of <span class="html-italic">C. auris</span> in infected <span class="html-italic">G. mellonella</span> tissues treated with NEA and AmB. NEA: nanoemulsion + amphotericin B; AmB: amphotericin B; PBS + AmP: phosphate-buffered saline + ampicillin 20 µg/mL with infection; NE: nanoemulsion with infection; NE and PBS + AmP: considered control groups or untreated groups. The absence of letters indicates that there is no statistical difference; the presence of letters indicates a statistical difference between the infection control group (PBS + AmP or NE) and the treated group (AmB and NEA). Time 0 indicates the fungal load after 2 h of infection. n = 3 larva/time.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Histopathological findings of <span class="html-italic">G. mellonella</span> larvae infected with <span class="html-italic">C. auris</span> InP13 strain stained with HE (<b>A</b>,<b>C</b>,<b>E</b>,<b>G</b>) and PAS (<b>B</b>,<b>D</b>,<b>F</b>,<b>H</b>), 100× magnification. (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>): PBS + ampicillin; (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>): nanoemulsion; (<b>E</b>,<b>F</b>): amphotericin B; (<b>G</b>,<b>H</b>): nanoemulsion + amphotericin B; (M): melanisation; (L): cluster of yeasts; (at): adipose tissue; (H): haemolymph; (h): haemocytes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Histopathological findings of <span class="html-italic">G. mellonella</span> larvae infected with the <span class="html-italic">C. auris</span> JAP 1 strain stained with HE (<b>A</b>,<b>C</b>,<b>E</b>,<b>G</b>) and PAS (<b>B</b>,<b>D</b>,<b>F</b>,<b>H</b>), 100× magnification. (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>): PBS + ampicillin; (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>): nanoemulsion; (<b>E</b>,<b>F</b>): amphotericin B; (<b>G</b>,<b>H</b>): nanoemulsion + amphotericin B; (M): melanisation; (L): cluster of yeasts; (at): adipose tissue; (H): haemolymph; (h): haemocytes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Histopathological findings of <span class="html-italic">G. mellonella</span> larvae infected with the <span class="html-italic">C. auris</span> SP96 strain, stained with HE (<b>A</b>,<b>C</b>,<b>E</b>,<b>G</b>) and PAS (<b>B</b>,<b>D</b>,<b>F</b>,<b>H</b>), 100× magnification. (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>): PBS + ampicillin; (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>): nanoemulsion; (<b>E</b>,<b>F</b>): amphotericin B; (<b>G</b>,<b>H</b>): nanoemulsion + amphotericin B; (M): melanisation; (L): cluster of yeasts; (at): adipose tissue; (H): haemolymph; (h): haemocytes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Histopathological findings of <span class="html-italic">G. mellonella</span> larvae infected with the <span class="html-italic">C. auris</span> VEN C6 strain stained with HE (<b>A</b>,<b>C</b>,<b>E</b>,<b>G</b>) and PAS (<b>B</b>,<b>D</b>,<b>F</b>,<b>H</b>), 100× magnification. (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>): PBS + ampicillin; (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>): nanoemulsion; (<b>E</b>,<b>F</b>): amphotericin B; (<b>G</b>,<b>H</b>): nanoemulsion + amphotericin B; (M): melanisation; (L): cluster of yeast; (at): adipose tissue; (H): haemolymph; (h): haemocytes; (P): budding or pseudohyphae.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Total count of granulomas in histopathological sections of <span class="html-italic">G. mellonella</span> treated with NEA and AmB. AmP: ampicillin; NE: nanoemulsion; AmB: amphotericin B; NEA: nanoemulsion + amphotericin B; NE and PBS + AmP: considered control groups or group without therapy. The absence of a letter means that there is no statistical difference; the presence of letters indicates a statistical difference compared with the control groups (PBS + AmP and NE); n = 3 larva/time.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 3669 KiB  
Article
In Vitro and In Vivo Activity of Citral in Combination with Amphotericin B, Anidulafungin and Fluconazole against Candida auris Isolates
by Iñigo de-la-Fuente, Andrea Guridi, Nerea Jauregizar, Elena Eraso, Guillermo Quindós and Elena Sevillano
J. Fungi 2023, 9(6), 648; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9060648 - 6 Jun 2023
Viewed by 1902
Abstract
Candida auris is an emerging fungal pathogen responsible for hospital outbreaks of invasive candidiasis associated with high mortality. The treatment of these mycoses is a clinical challenge due to the high resistance levels of this species to current antifungal drugs, and alternative therapeutic [...] Read more.
Candida auris is an emerging fungal pathogen responsible for hospital outbreaks of invasive candidiasis associated with high mortality. The treatment of these mycoses is a clinical challenge due to the high resistance levels of this species to current antifungal drugs, and alternative therapeutic strategies are needed. In this study, we evaluated the in vitro and in vivo activities of combinations of citral with anidulafungin, amphotericin B or fluconazole against 19 C. auris isolates. The antifungal effect of citral was in most cases similar to the effect of the antifungal drugs in monotherapy. The best combination results were obtained with anidulafungin, with synergistic and additive interactions against 7 and 11 of the 19 isolates, respectively. The combination of 0.06 μg/mL anidulafungin and 64 μg/mL citral showed the best results, with a survival rate of 63.2% in Caenorhabditis elegans infected with C. auris UPV 17-279. The combination of fluconazole with citral reduced the MIC of fluconazole from > 64 to 1–4 μg/mL against 12 isolates, and a combination of 2 μg/mL fluconazole and 64 μg/mL citral was also effective in reducing mortality in C. elegans. Amphotericin B combined with citral, although effective in vitro, did not improve the activity of each compound in vivo. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antifungal Discovery of Natural Products)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Synergy distribution determined by a Bliss interaction model for the combination of amphotericin B (AMB) and citral (CIT) against <span class="html-italic">C. auris</span> 17-280. Left: matrix synergy plot with synergy scores for each combination. Right: synergy distribution mapped to the dose–response surface. (* <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Synergy distribution determined by a Bliss interaction model for the combination of anidulafungin (ANI) and citral (CIT) against <span class="html-italic">C. auris</span> UPV 17-283. Left: matrix synergy plot with synergy scores for each combination. Right: synergy distribution mapped to the dose–response surface. (* <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Synergy distribution determined by a Bliss interaction model for the combination of fluconazole (FLZ) and citral (CIT) against <span class="html-italic">C. auris</span> UPV 17-261. Left: matrix synergy plot with synergy scores for each combination. Right: synergy distribution mapped to the dose–response surface. (* <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 10<sup>−4</sup>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Survival assay of <span class="html-italic">C. elegans</span> infected with isolates <span class="html-italic">C. auris</span> UPV 17-281, <span class="html-italic">C. auris</span> UPV 17-267 and <span class="html-italic">C. auris</span> UPV 17-279 and treated with fluconazole (FLZ) and citral (CIT).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Survival assay of <span class="html-italic">C. elegans</span> infected with <span class="html-italic">C. auris</span> UPV 17-281, <span class="html-italic">C. auris</span> UPV 17-267 and <span class="html-italic">C. auris</span> UPV 17-279 isolates and treated with anidulafungin (ANI) and citral (CIT).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Survival assay of <span class="html-italic">C. elegans</span> infected with <span class="html-italic">C. auris</span> UPV 17-281, <span class="html-italic">C. auris</span> UPV 17-267 and <span class="html-italic">C. auris</span> UPV 17-279 isolates and treated with amphotericin B (AMB) and citral (CIT).</p>
Full article ">
10 pages, 299 KiB  
Brief Report
The Mortality Attributable to Candidemia in C. auris Is Higher than That in Other Candida Species: Myth or Reality?
by Carlos A. Alvarez-Moreno, Soraya Morales-López, Gerson J. Rodriguez, Jose Y. Rodriguez, Estelle Robert, Carine Picot, Andrés Ceballos-Garzon, Claudia M. Parra-Giraldo and Patrice Le Pape
J. Fungi 2023, 9(4), 430; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9040430 - 31 Mar 2023
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 3936
Abstract
Candida auris has become a major health threat due to its transmissibility, multidrug resistance and severe outcomes. In a case-control design, 74 hospitalised patients with candidemia were enrolled. In total, 22 cases (29.7%) and 52 controls (C. albicans, 21.6%; C. parapsilosis [...] Read more.
Candida auris has become a major health threat due to its transmissibility, multidrug resistance and severe outcomes. In a case-control design, 74 hospitalised patients with candidemia were enrolled. In total, 22 cases (29.7%) and 52 controls (C. albicans, 21.6%; C. parapsilosis, 21.6%; C. tropicalis, 21.6%; C. glabrata, 1.4%) were included and analysed in this study. Risk factors, clinical and microbiological characteristics and outcomes of patients with C. auris and non-auris Candida species (NACS) candidemia were compared. Previous fluconazole exposure was significantly higher in C. auris candidemia patients (OR 3.3; 1.15–9.5). Most C. auris isolates were resistant to fluconazole (86.3%) and amphotericin B (59%) whilst NACS isolates were generally susceptible. No isolates resistant to echinocandins were detected. The average time to start antifungal therapy was 3.6 days. Sixty-three (85.1%) patients received adequate antifungal therapy, without significant differences between the two groups. The crude mortality at 30 and 90 days of candidemia was up to 37.8% and 40.5%, respectively. However, there was no difference in mortality both at 30 and 90 days between the group with candidemia by C. auris (31.8%) and by NACS (42.3%) (OR 0.6; 95% IC 0.24–1.97) and 36.4% and 42.3% (0.77; 0.27–2.1), respectively. In this study, mortality due to candidemia between C. auris and NACS was similar. Appropriate antifungal therapy in both groups may have contributed to finding no differences in outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pathogenesis and Treatment of Candida Species)
12 pages, 849 KiB  
Article
Emergence of Clonally-Related South Asian Clade I Clinical Isolates of Candida auris in a Greek COVID-19 Intensive Care Unit
by Maria Katsiari, Angeliki Mavroidi, Nikolaos Kesesidis, Eleftheria Palla, Konstantina Zourla, Kyriakos Ntorlis, Konstantinos Konstantinidis, Maria Laskou, Konstantinos Strigklis, Anastasios Sakkalis, Charikleia Nikolaou, Evangelia D. Platsouka, Ioannis Karakasiliotis, Georgia Vrioni and Athanasios Tsakris
J. Fungi 2023, 9(2), 243; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9020243 - 11 Feb 2023
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 2593
Abstract
Candida auris has recently emerged as a multidrug-resistant yeast implicated in various healthcare-associated invasive infections and hospital outbreaks. In the current study, we report the first five intensive care unit (ICU) cases affected by C. auris isolates in Greece, during October 2020–January 2022. [...] Read more.
Candida auris has recently emerged as a multidrug-resistant yeast implicated in various healthcare-associated invasive infections and hospital outbreaks. In the current study, we report the first five intensive care unit (ICU) cases affected by C. auris isolates in Greece, during October 2020–January 2022. The ICU of the hospital was converted to a COVID-19 unit on 25 February 2021, during the third wave of COVID-19 in Greece. Identification of the isolates was confirmed by Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time of Flight mass spectroscopy (MALDI-TOF]. Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed by the EUCAST broth microdilution method. Based on the tentative CDC MIC breakpoints, all five C. auris isolates were resistant to fluconazole (≥32 μg/mL), while three of them exhibited resistance to amphotericin B (≥2 μg/mL). The environmental screening also revealed the dissemination of C. auris in the ICU. Molecular characterization of C. auris clinical and environmental isolates was performed by MultiLocus Sequence Typing (MLST) of a set of four genetic loci, namely ITS, D1/D2, RPB1 and RPB2, encoding for the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS) of the ribosomal subunit, the large ribosomal subunit region and the RNA polymerase II largest subunit, respectively. MLST analysis showed that all isolates possessed identical sequences in the four genetic loci and clustered with the South Asian clade I strains. Additionally, PCR amplification and sequencing of the CJJ09_001802 genetic locus, encoding for the “nucleolar protein 58” that contains clade-specific repeats was performed. Sanger sequence analysis of the TCCTTCTTC repeats within CJJ09_001802 locus also assigned the C. auris isolates to the South Asian clade I. Our study confirms that C. auris is an emerging yeast pathogen in our region, especially in the setting of the ongoing COVID-19 worldwide pandemic. Adherence to strict infection control is needed to restrain further spread of the pathogen. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Timeline of the five <span class="html-italic">C. auris</span> cases in the ICU. The boxes denote the length of stay (LOS) of <span class="html-italic">C. auris</span> cases in the ICU prior (grey boxes) and post to (black boxes) the isolation of <span class="html-italic">C. auris</span>. The black line denotes the period that the ICU has been functioned as a COVID-19 ICU.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Evolutionary relationships based on the concatenated ITS, RPB1, RPB2 and D1/D2-nucleotide sequences of the <span class="html-italic">C. auris</span> isolates identified in this study and other strains belonging to clades Ι to V. The identifier <span class="html-italic">C. auris</span> strain names and countries of isolation are depicted. Branches corresponding to partitions reproduced in less than 50% bootstrap replicates were collapsed. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (500 replicates) are shown next to the branches.</p>
Full article ">
7 pages, 283 KiB  
Article
Initial Results of the International Efforts in Screening New Agents against Candida auris
by Vanice Rodrigues Poester, Lívia Silveira Munhoz, Jéssica Louise Benelli, Aryse Martins Melo, Abdullah M. S. Al-Hatmi, David J. Larwood, Marife Martinez, David A. Stevens and Melissa Orzechowski Xavier
J. Fungi 2022, 8(8), 771; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8080771 - 25 Jul 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2156
Abstract
Background: Candida auris is an emergent fungal pathogen and a global concern, mostly due to its resistance to many currently available antifungal drugs. Objective: Thus, in response to this challenge, we evaluated the in vitro activity of potential new drugs, diphenyl diselenide (PhSe) [...] Read more.
Background: Candida auris is an emergent fungal pathogen and a global concern, mostly due to its resistance to many currently available antifungal drugs. Objective: Thus, in response to this challenge, we evaluated the in vitro activity of potential new drugs, diphenyl diselenide (PhSe)2 and nikkomycin Z (nikZ), alone and in association with currently available antifungals (azoles, echinocandins, and polyenes) against Candida auris. Methods: Clinical isolates of C. auris were tested in vitro. (PhSe)2 and nikZ activities were tested alone and in combination with amphotericin B, fluconazole, or the echinocandins, micafungin and caspofungin. Results: (PhSe)2 alone was unable to inhibit C. auris, and antagonism or indifferent effects were observed in the combination of this compound with the antifungals tested. NikZ appeared not active alone either, but frequently acted cooperatively with conventional antifungals. Conclusion: Our data show that (PhSe)2 appears to not have a good potential to be a candidate in the development of new drugs to treat C. auris, but that nikZ is worthy of further study. Full article
15 pages, 911 KiB  
Article
Antifungal Activity of Select Essential Oils against Candida auris and Their Interactions with Antifungal Drugs
by Ryan A. Parker, Kyle T. Gabriel, Kayla D. Graham, Bethany K. Butts and Christopher T. Cornelison
Pathogens 2022, 11(8), 821; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11080821 - 22 Jul 2022
Cited by 25 | Viewed by 4877
Abstract
Candida auris is an emerging fungal pathogen that commonly causes nosocomial blood infections in the immunocompromised. Several factors make this pathogen a global threat, including its misidentification as closely related species, its ability to survive for weeks on fomites, and its resistance to [...] Read more.
Candida auris is an emerging fungal pathogen that commonly causes nosocomial blood infections in the immunocompromised. Several factors make this pathogen a global threat, including its misidentification as closely related species, its ability to survive for weeks on fomites, and its resistance to commonly prescribed antifungal drugs, sometimes to all three classes of systemic antifungal drugs. These factors demonstrate a need for the development of novel therapeutic approaches to combat this pathogen. In the present study, the antifungal activities of 21 essential oils were tested against C. auris. Several essential oils were observed to inhibit the growth and kill C. auris, Candida lusitaniae, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae when in direct contact and at concentrations considered safe for topical use. The most effective essential oils were those extracted from lemongrass, clove bud, and cinnamon bark. These essential oils also elicited antifungal activity in gaseous form. The efficacies of formulations comprised of these three essential oils in combination with fluconazole, amphotericin B, flucytosine, and micafungin were explored. While synergism was neither observed with cinnamon bark oil nor any of the antifungal drugs, lemongrass oil displayed synergistic, additive, and indifferent interactions with select drugs. Formulations of clove bud oil with amphotericin B resulted in antagonistic interactions but displayed synergistic interactions with fluconazole and flucytosine. These essential oils and their combinations with antifungal drugs may provide useful options for surface disinfection, skin sanitization, and possibly even the treatment of Candida infections. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 10th Anniversary of Pathogens—Feature Papers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Selection of well for calculating FIC values of an example plate. Gold wells indicate growth. The well used for calculation is the inhibited well that is approximately midway along the inhibition interface, denoted as the light blue well in the example plate.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop