[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (3,903)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = crop farming

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
15 pages, 984 KiB  
Review
Therapeutic Potential of Endophytic Microbes: Emphasizing Both Fungal and Bacterial Endophytes
by Azhar Abdullah Najjar
Appl. Microbiol. 2025, 5(1), 5; https://doi.org/10.3390/applmicrobiol5010005 - 5 Jan 2025
Viewed by 181
Abstract
This review explores the diverse applications and therapeutic potential of endophytic microbes, emphasizing both fungal and bacterial endophytes. These microorganisms reside within plant tissues without causing harm and play an important role in enhancing plant growth, nutrient acquisition, and resistance to pathogens. They [...] Read more.
This review explores the diverse applications and therapeutic potential of endophytic microbes, emphasizing both fungal and bacterial endophytes. These microorganisms reside within plant tissues without causing harm and play an important role in enhancing plant growth, nutrient acquisition, and resistance to pathogens. They produce phytohormones, facilitate nutrient uptake, solubilize essential nutrients, fix nitrogen, and improve stress tolerance. Furthermore, endophytes contribute to agricultural sustainability by producing plant growth regulators, providing biocontrol against pathogens through antimicrobial compounds, and competing for resources. Integrating endophytic microbes into agricultural practices can reduce reliance on chemical fertilizers and pesticides, promoting eco-friendly and sustainable farming. This review highlights the dual role of endophytic microbes in fostering sustainable agriculture and providing novel therapeutic applications. By minimizing dependence on chemical inputs, endophytes support environmental health while boosting crop yields. The synthesis underscores the importance of leveraging endophytic microbes to tackle global food security and sustainability challenges. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Symbiotic relationship between fungal and bacterial endophytes and plants.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 2179 KiB  
Article
Sources and Application Modes of Phosphorus in a No-Till Wheat–Soybean Cropping System
by Vanderson M. Duart, Victor G. Finkler and Eduardo F. Caires
Sustainability 2025, 17(1), 268; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17010268 - 2 Jan 2025
Viewed by 351
Abstract
Phosphate fertilization management under no-till farming has important implications for sustainable agriculture, especially in highly weathered soils. A field experiment examined the effects of phosphorus (P) sources and application modes on soil P levels, plant P nutrition, and grain yields of a wheat–soybean [...] Read more.
Phosphate fertilization management under no-till farming has important implications for sustainable agriculture, especially in highly weathered soils. A field experiment examined the effects of phosphorus (P) sources and application modes on soil P levels, plant P nutrition, and grain yields of a wheat–soybean cropping system under no-till. Five cycles of a wheat–soybean crop succession were evaluated on an Oxisol in the period from 2016 to 2021 in the State of Parana, Brazil. The treatments consisted of fertilization with monoammonium phosphate (MAP) and single superphosphate (SSP), in addition to a control without P, to subplots within plots with in-furrow and broadcast P applications. The annual application of 100 kg of P2O5 ha−1 from phosphate sources, either broadcast or in the sowing furrow, was sufficient to maintain an adequate level of P in the soil, supply P demand for the secession of wheat–soybean crops, and obtain high grain yields. In a wheat–soybean cropping system, the application of the fertilizers MAP or SSP-based phosphates in the sowing furrow or broadcast in wheat crop is a strategy that should be encouraged in highly weathered soils under no-till to minimize P fixation to soil particles, improve P-leaf concentration, and increase wheat and soybean grain yields. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Data on the (<b>a</b>) monthly rainfall that occurred and the 47-year (1954–2001) average monthly rainfall in Ponta Grossa, Southern Brazil, and the (<b>b</b>) relative humidity and monthly minimum and maximum temperatures for the duration of the experiment (2016–2021).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Soil P (Mehlich-1) levels at 0–10 and 10–20 cm depths after the soybean harvest in (<b>a</b>) 2017 (first soil sampling), (<b>b</b>) 2019 (second soil sampling), and (<b>c</b>) 2021 (third soil sampling) as affected by application modes and P sources. Values followed by the same letter, lowercase for application modes and uppercase for P sources, are not significantly different by the LSD test at <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.05. Error bars denote standard deviation from the mean.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Soil P levels (Mehlich-1) at (<b>a</b>) 0–10 cm and (<b>b</b>) 10–20 cm depths considering the P sources (control, MAP, and SSP) throughout the growing years. Values followed by the same letter within each year are not significantly different by the LSD test at <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.05. ns = non-significant.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Cumulative wheat grain yield of the 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020 harvests as affected by (<b>a</b>) application modes and (<b>b</b>) P sources. Values followed by the same letter in columns are not significantly different by the LSD test at <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.05. Error bars denote standard deviation from the mean.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The cumulative soybean grain yield of the 2016–2017, 2017–2018, 2018–2019, 2019–2020, and 2020–2021 harvests as affected by (<b>a</b>) application modes and (<b>b</b>) P sources. Values followed by the same letter in columns are not significantly different by the LSD test at <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.05. Error bars denote standard deviation from the mean.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Relative cumulative grain yields of wheat (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) and soybean (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) as affected by the soil P concentration at 0–10 and 10–20 cm depths. Soils were sampled in 2021, 5 years after beginning the experiment. ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 714 KiB  
Article
Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Maize Biomass Yield: Leveraging Feature Engineering and Comprehensive Data Integration
by Maryam Abbasi, Paulo Váz, José Silva and Pedro Martins
Sustainability 2025, 17(1), 256; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17010256 - 2 Jan 2025
Viewed by 302
Abstract
The efficient prediction of corn biomass yield is critical for optimizing crop production and addressing global challenges in sustainable agriculture and renewable energy. This study employs advanced machine learning techniques, including Gradient Boosting Machines (GBMs), Random Forests (RFs), Support Vector Machines (SVMs), and [...] Read more.
The efficient prediction of corn biomass yield is critical for optimizing crop production and addressing global challenges in sustainable agriculture and renewable energy. This study employs advanced machine learning techniques, including Gradient Boosting Machines (GBMs), Random Forests (RFs), Support Vector Machines (SVMs), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), integrated with comprehensive environmental, soil, and crop management data from key agricultural regions in the United States. A novel framework combines feature engineering, such as the creation of a Soil Fertility Index (SFI) and Growing Degree Days (GDDs), and the incorporation of interaction terms to address complex non-linear relationships between input variables and biomass yield. We conduct extensive sensitivity analysis and employ SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values to enhance model interpretability, identifying SFI, GDDs, and cumulative rainfall as the most influential features driving yield outcomes. Our findings highlight significant synergies among these variables, emphasizing their critical role in rural environmental governance and precision agriculture. Furthermore, an ensemble approach combining GBMs, RFs, and ANNs outperformed individual models, achieving an RMSE of 0.80 t/ha and R2 of 0.89. These results underscore the potential of hybrid modeling for real-world applications in sustainable farming practices. Addressing the concerns of passive farmer participation, we propose targeted incentives, education, and institutional support mechanisms to enhance stakeholder collaboration in rural environmental governance. While the models assume rational decision-making, the inclusion of cultural and political factors warrants further investigation to improve the robustness of the framework. Additionally, a map of the study region and improved visualizations of feature importance enhance the clarity and relevance of our findings. This research contributes to the growing body of knowledge on predictive modeling in agriculture, combining theoretical rigor with practical insights to support policymakers and stakeholders in optimizing resource use and addressing environmental challenges. By improving the interpretability and applicability of machine learning models, this study provides actionable strategies for enhancing crop yield predictions and advancing rural environmental governance. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Learning curves for GBMs and RFs models. GBMs model achieves lower validation errors with smaller training sets, showcasing its learning efficiency and predictive power compared to RFs model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Top 10 features based on mean absolute SHAP values. SFI was the most critical factor, followed by GDDs and cumulative rainfall.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Interaction effects of SFI and GDDs on biomass yield. The synergistic effect of high SFI and GDD values is evident, leading to higher yields.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Partial dependence plots for key features. The plots show non-linear relationships, with diminishing returns for SFI and GDDs beyond certain thresholds.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Sensitivity analysis of GBMs model to key input variables. SFI is the most sensitive variable, followed by GDDs and cumulative rainfall.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Heatmap of feature correlations. Strong positive correlations between GDDs, cumulative rainfall, and biomass yield are observed, while planting density shows a negative correlation at higher levels.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 6345 KiB  
Article
Fast Dynamic Time Warping and Hierarchical Clustering with Multispectral and Synthetic Aperture Radar Temporal Analysis for Unsupervised Winter Food Crop Mapping
by Hsuan-Yi Li, James A. Lawarence, Philippa J. Mason and Richard C. Ghail
Agriculture 2025, 15(1), 82; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15010082 - 2 Jan 2025
Viewed by 364
Abstract
Food sustainability has become a major global concern in recent years. Multiple complimentary strategies to deal with this issue have been developed; one of these approaches is regenerative farming. The identification and analysis of crop type phenology are required to achieve sustainable regenerative [...] Read more.
Food sustainability has become a major global concern in recent years. Multiple complimentary strategies to deal with this issue have been developed; one of these approaches is regenerative farming. The identification and analysis of crop type phenology are required to achieve sustainable regenerative faming. Earth Observation (EO) data have been widely applied to crop type identification using supervised Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) classifications, but these methods commonly rely on large amounts of ground truth data, which usually prevent historical analysis and may be impractical in very remote, very extensive or politically unstable regions. Thus, the development of a robust but intelligent unsupervised classification model is attractive for the long-term and sustainable prediction of agricultural yields. Here, we propose FastDTW-HC, a combination of Fast Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) and Hierarchical Clustering (HC), as a significantly improved method that requires no ground truth input for the classification of winter food crop varieties of barley, wheat and rapeseed, in Norfolk, UK. A series of variables is first derived from the EO products, and these include spectral indices from Sentinel-2 multispectral data and backscattered amplitude values at dual polarisations from Sentinel-1 Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) data. Then, the phenological patterns of winter barley, winter wheat and winter rapeseed are analysed using the FastDTW-HC applied to the time-series created for each variable, between Nov 2019 and June 2020. Future research will extend this winter food crop mapping analysis using FastDTW-HC modelling to a regional scale. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The growth stages of winter barley, winter wheat and winter rapeseed from late November to June [<a href="#B33-agriculture-15-00082" class="html-bibr">33</a>,<a href="#B34-agriculture-15-00082" class="html-bibr">34</a>,<a href="#B35-agriculture-15-00082" class="html-bibr">35</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Location of Norfolk in the UK, using a Google Earth image (inset), and a Sentinel-2 image map of Norfolk, UK, with the yellow square showing the study area; (<b>b</b>) detailed image of the study area and ground truth point locations for winter barley (orange), wheat (blue) and rapeseed (lilac) from RPA, UK.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The flowchart and workflow of this research.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The general concepts of the Euclidean and DTW similarity (distance) calculations between pixels X and Y in two time-series.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Illustration of a “warp path” between the index values of two pixels in two time-series datasets, X and Y, in an n-by-m matrix of time points, where the “warp path” represents the similarity between the index values of two pixels in time-series n and m.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>An example of the Fast DTW process on an optimal warping alignment with local neighbourhood adjustments from a 1/8 resolution to the original resolution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>A graphical illustration of the hierarchical clustering concept. Five individual (conceptual) clusters (A, B, C, D and E) are clustered according to their similarity (i.e., distance) values. Clusters A and B and clusters D and E then form new clusters of AB and DE, whilst C remains alone. Similarities among AB, DE and the individual cluster C, are then used to form the second layer. Since C is more similar to AB, a new ABC cluster is formed whilst DE remains. The final layer gathers all remaining clusters into one large cluster, ABCDE, and the dendrogram of A, B, C, D and E is formed [<a href="#B48-agriculture-15-00082" class="html-bibr">48</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) Supervised classification results on winter crops produced by the RPA (RPA, 2021); (<b>b</b>) initial result with the NDVI and the final integration results with R1 to R5 (<b>c</b>–<b>g</b>). Orange represents barley, blue represents wheat and lilac represents rapeseed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8 Cont.
<p>(<b>a</b>) Supervised classification results on winter crops produced by the RPA (RPA, 2021); (<b>b</b>) initial result with the NDVI and the final integration results with R1 to R5 (<b>c</b>–<b>g</b>). Orange represents barley, blue represents wheat and lilac represents rapeseed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Spectral index and amplitude values throughout the growing season for winter varieties of barley (orange), wheat (blue) and rapeseed (lilac).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9 Cont.
<p>Spectral index and amplitude values throughout the growing season for winter varieties of barley (orange), wheat (blue) and rapeseed (lilac).</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 249 KiB  
Article
Yield, Quality, Antioxidants, and Mineral Composition of Traditional Italian Storage Onion Cultivars in Response to Protein Hydrolysate and Microalgae Biostimulation
by Alessio Vincenzo Tallarita, Otilia Cristina Murariu, Tomas Kopta, Florin Daniel Lipșa, Leonardo Gomez, Eugenio Cozzolino, Pasquale Lombardi, Silvio Russo and Gianluca Caruso
Horticulturae 2025, 11(1), 25; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11010025 - 2 Jan 2025
Viewed by 280
Abstract
Increasing interest is being devoted to environmentally friendly strategies, such as the use of plant biostimulants, to enhance crop performance and concurrently ensure food security under the perspective of sustainable management. The effects of two biostimulant formulations (protein hydrolysate and spirulina) on four [...] Read more.
Increasing interest is being devoted to environmentally friendly strategies, such as the use of plant biostimulants, to enhance crop performance and concurrently ensure food security under the perspective of sustainable management. The effects of two biostimulant formulations (protein hydrolysate and spirulina) on four Italian traditional storage onion cultivars (Ramata di Montoro, Rossa di Tropea, Rocca Bruna, Dorata di Parma) were investigated in Naples province (southern Italy), in terms of yield, quality, shelf-life, bioactive compounds, and mineral composition. Ramata di Montoro showed the highest levels of yield (66.4 t ha−1) and vitamin C (31.5 mg g−1 d.w.) and the longest shelf-life (228 days). Significant increases in marketable yield were recorded under the applications of both protein hydrolysate (+15.5%) and spirulina (+12.4%) compared to the untreated control. The two biostimulant formulations significantly increased bulb shelf-life and the contents of polyphenols (201.4 mg gallic acid eq. 100 g−1 d.w. on average vs. 158.6 of the untreated control), vitamin C (26.8 mg g−1 d.w. on average vs. 22), and both lipophilic and hydrophilic antioxidant activities. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of both protein hydrolysate and spirulina as sustainable tools for enhancing both yield and quality parameters within the frame of environmentally friendly farming management. Full article
29 pages, 1823 KiB  
Review
From Natural Hosts to Agricultural Threats: The Evolutionary Journey of Phytopathogenic Fungi
by Asanka Madhushan, Dulan Bhanuka Weerasingha, Evgeny Ilyukhin, Paul W. J. Taylor, Amila Sandaruwan Ratnayake, Jian-Kui Liu and Sajeewa S. N. Maharachchikumbura
J. Fungi 2025, 11(1), 25; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11010025 - 1 Jan 2025
Viewed by 626
Abstract
Since the domestication of plants, pathogenic fungi have consistently threatened crop production, evolving genetically to develop increased virulence under various selection pressures. Understanding their evolutionary trends is crucial for predicting and designing control measures against future disease outbreaks. This paper reviews the evolution [...] Read more.
Since the domestication of plants, pathogenic fungi have consistently threatened crop production, evolving genetically to develop increased virulence under various selection pressures. Understanding their evolutionary trends is crucial for predicting and designing control measures against future disease outbreaks. This paper reviews the evolution of fungal pathogens from natural habitats to agricultural settings, focusing on eight significant phytopathogens: Pyricularia oryzae, Botrytis cinerea, Puccinia spp., Fusarium graminearum, F. oxysporum, Blumeria graminis, Zymoseptoria tritici, and Colletotrichum spp. Also, we explore the mechanism used to understand evolutionary trends in these fungi. The studied pathogens have evolved in agroecosystems through either (1) introduction from elsewhere; or (2) local origins involving co-evolution with host plants, host shifts, or genetic variations within existing strains. Genetic variation, generated via sexual recombination and various asexual mechanisms, often drives pathogen evolution. While sexual recombination is rare and mainly occurs at the center of origin of the pathogen, asexual mechanisms such as mutations, parasexual recombination, horizontal gene or chromosome transfer, and chromosomal structural variations are predominant. Farming practices like mono-cropping resistant cultivars and prolonged use of fungicides with the same mode of action can drive the emergence of new pathotypes. Furthermore, host range does not necessarily impact pathogen adaptation and evolution. Although halting pathogen evolution is impractical, its pace can be slowed by managing selective pressures, optimizing farming practices, and enforcing quarantine regulations. The study of pathogen evolution has been transformed by advancements in molecular biology, genomics, and bioinformatics, utilizing methods like next-generation sequencing, comparative genomics, transcriptomics and population genomics. However, continuous research remains essential to monitor how pathogens evolve over time and to develop proactive strategies that mitigate their impact on agriculture. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Dark Side of Sordariomycetes)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>An image illustrating human-induced selection pressures in an agricultural ecosystem. Farming practices such as monocropping, pesticide application, fertilization, and stubble burning affect the evolutionary dynamics of pathogenic fungi. Expanding crop cultivation into natural ecosystems allows pathogenic fungi from natural settings to transfer to cultivated crops, where they may undergo rapid evolutionary changes due to exposure to previously unexperienced conditions in agricultural lands.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>An illustration depicting the emergence of novel pathogenic fungi in agricultural ecosystems. Phytopathogenic fungi can evolve either through the introduction from external sources or through local origins, which involve processes such as host-pathogen co-evolution, host shifting, and genetic variations within existing pathogenic strains.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 855 KiB  
Article
An Economic Model Evaluating Competitive Wheat Genotypes for Weed Suppression and Yield in a Wheat and Canola Rotation
by Thomas L. Nordblom, Saliya Gurusinghe, Pieter-Willem Hendriks, Greg J. Rebetzke and Leslie A. Weston
Agronomy 2025, 15(1), 103; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15010103 - 1 Jan 2025
Viewed by 292
Abstract
Recurrent selection for early vigour traits in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) has provided an opportunity to generate competitive biotypes to suppress agronomically important weeds. Quantifying the potential benefits of competitive genotypes, including yield improvement and reduced frequency of herbicide application when incorporated [...] Read more.
Recurrent selection for early vigour traits in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) has provided an opportunity to generate competitive biotypes to suppress agronomically important weeds. Quantifying the potential benefits of competitive genotypes, including yield improvement and reduced frequency of herbicide application when incorporated into a long-term rotation, is vital to increase grower adoption. In this simple economic model, we evaluated a weed-suppressive early vigour genotype utilising on-farm experimental results and simulation analysis to predict gross margins for a seven-year wheat-canola rotation in southeastern Australia. The model applied a local weather sequence and predicted wheat production potential, costs and benefits over time. An early vigour wheat genotype was compared to commercial wheat cultivars for weed control, yield and actual production cost. With respect to weed control, three scenarios were evaluated in the model: standard herbicide use with a commercial cultivar (A), herbicide use reduced moderately by inclusion of an early vigour wheat genotype and elimination of the postharvest grass herbicide (B) or inclusion of an early vigour wheat genotype and withdrawal of both postharvest grass and broadleaf herbicides (C). Cost savings for the use of a competitive wheat genotype ranged from 12 AUD/ha in scenario B to 40 AUD/ha in scenario C, for a total saving of 52 AUD/ha. The model generated annual background gross margins, which varied from 300 AUD/ha to 1400 AUD/ha based on historical weather conditions, production costs and crop prices over the 30-year period from 1992 to 2021. The benefits of lower costs for each of the three scenarios are presented with rolling seven-year average wheat–canola rotation gross margins over the 30-year period. The limitations of this model for evaluation of weed suppression and cost benefits are discussed, as well as relative opportunities for adoption of early vigour traits in wheat. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Farming Sustainability)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Comparison of grain yields of high-vigour lines (W010709, W400203, W670704 and W470201) with commercial cultivars (Condo, Wyalkatchem, Yitpi, Janz, Mace), historic cultivar (Federation) and the triticale control (Chopper) from experimental plots established in Wagga Wagga, 2020. The open arrow points to the commercial wheat cultivar “Condo” and the red arrow points to the early vigour genotype “W470201”, each yielding 6 t/ha in 2020. This conjunction allowed the simple economic comparisons made in this paper. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean. Bars that share the same letters are not significantly different (<span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.05). Adapted from Hendriks 2023 [<a href="#B11-agronomy-15-00103" class="html-bibr">11</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Wheat and canola in 24 seven-year rotations simulated for Wagga Wagga, NSW, under three weed control regimes, A, B and C from 1992 to 2021: (<b>a</b>) rolling annual average for wheat and canola gross margins, and (<b>b</b>) rolling annual wheat gross margins, all calculations are presented in 2021 AUD/ha/year.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 11775 KiB  
Article
Mulching Practice Regulates the Soil Hydrothermal Regime to Improve Crop Productivity in the Rainfed Agroecosystem of the Loess Plateau in China
by Fanxiang Han, Yuanhong Zhang, Lei Chang, Yuwei Chai, Zhengyu Bao, Hongbo Cheng, Shouxi Chai, Fangguo Chang, Guohua Chang and Ruiqi Yang
Agriculture 2025, 15(1), 76; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15010076 - 31 Dec 2024
Viewed by 308
Abstract
Mulching practices have demonstrated the potential to increase crop yields and resource utilization efficiency. However, the response of different crops with various growth stages to different mulching practices remains unclear, particularly in the rainfed agroecosystem. Therefore, a two-year field experiment (2013–2015) of different [...] Read more.
Mulching practices have demonstrated the potential to increase crop yields and resource utilization efficiency. However, the response of different crops with various growth stages to different mulching practices remains unclear, particularly in the rainfed agroecosystem. Therefore, a two-year field experiment (2013–2015) of different crops (wheat, maize, and potato) was conducted to evaluate the effects of three different mulching treatments: straw strip mulching (SM), plastic film mulching (PM), and conventional planting without mulching as the control (CK), on soil moisture and temperature, evapotranspiration (ET), water use efficiency (WUE), crop yield and economic benefits on the Loess Plateau. The results indicated that both mulching practices significantly increased the soil water content (SM: 4.3% and PM: 3.6%) compared to CK. However, the effects on soil temperature varied between mulching practices, PM increased soil temperature by 4.9% compared to CK, while SM decreased it by 6.3%. The improved soil hydrothermal conditions, characterized by favorable temperatures and higher soil water status would lead to a higher crop daily growth rate (5.3–49.8%), as well as greater dry matter accumulation (4.7–36.7%). Furthermore, mulching practice (SM and PM) has a significant influence on crop yield and its components of various crops, as well as WUE. The mean grain yield of SM and PM was, respectively, increased by 11.4% and 27.1% for winter wheat, compared to CK, 1.8% and 24.3% for spring maize, and 23.0% and 13.9% for potato, respectively. Compared to CK, PM yielded a higher net economic benefit and WUE for winter wheat and spring maize, while SM presented the best economic benefit and WUE for potato. In conclusion, a comprehensive analysis of crop yield, economic benefits, and resource utilization efficiency suggests that straw strip mulching for potato is a more sustainable environmentally friendly mulching practice, recommended for rainfed farming systems on the Loess Plateau and areas with similar climatic conditions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic diagram of the different cropping systems, and the temperature and precipitation during the 2013–2015 growing seasons at Tongwei, China. SM, straw strip mulching; PM, plastic film mulching; CK, conventional planting without mulching.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Yield and its components of different mulching practices during 2013–2015 growing seasons. SM, straw strip mulching; PM, plastic film mulching; CK, conventional planting without mulching. Different letters following the means represent significance at the 5% level (LSD). Error bar represents the standard error of mean (n = 3).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Relationships between the crop yield and yield components of different crops. Note: * represents significance at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; *** represents significance at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Dry matter accumulation and daily growth rate of different mulching practices during 2013–2015 growing seasons. SM, straw strip mulching; PM, plastic film mulching; CK, conventional planting without mulching; RV, reviving stage; JT, jointing stage; HA, heading stage; FL, flowering stage; GF, grain-filling stage; HV, harvest stage; SD, seeding stage; BF, big flare stage; SQ, squaring stage; TF, tuber formation stage; TB, tuber bulging stage; SA, starch accumulation stage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Dynamics of soil water content (%) in the 0–200 cm soil layer of different mulching practices during 2013–2015 growing seasons. SM, straw strip mulching; PM, plastic film mulching; CK, conventional planting without mulching; SW, sowing stage; WT, wintering stage; RV, reviving stage; JT, jointing stage; HA, heading stage; FL, flowering stage; GF, grain-filling stage; HV, harvest stage; SD, seeding stage; BF, big flare stage; SQ, squaring stage; TF, tuber formation stage; TB, tuber bulging stage; SA, starch accumulation stage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Soil water storage in the 0–200 cm soil layer under different mulching practices during 2013–2025. SM, straw strip mulching; PM, plastic film mulching; CK, conventional planting without mulching. The gray and pink areas represent the growing periods of winter wheat, spring maize or potato. Error bar represents the standard error of mean (n = 3).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Dynamics of soil temperature (°C) in the 0–25 cm soil layer of different mulching practices during 2013–2015 growing seasons. SM, straw strip mulching; PM, plastic film mulching; CK, conventional planting without mulching; WT, wintering stage; RV, reviving stage; JT, jointing stage; HA, heading stage; FL, flowering stage; GF, grain-filling stage; HV, harvest stage; SD, seeding stage; BF, big flare stage; SQ, squaring stage; TF, tuber formation stage; TB, tuber bulging stage; SA, starch accumulation stage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Average soil temperature in the 0–25 cm soil layer under different mulching practices during 2013–2015. SM, straw strip mulching; PM, plastic film mulching; CK, conventional planting without mulching. The gray and pink areas represent the growing periods of winter wheat, spring maize or potato. Error bar represents the standard error of mean (n = 3).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Evapotranspiration and water use efficiency of different mulching practices during 2013–2015 growing seasons. SM, straw strip mulching; PM, plastic film mulching; CK, conventional planting without mulching. Different letters following the means represent significance at the 5% level (LSD). Error bar represents the standard error of mean (n = 3).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Performance of selected parameters for different cropping systems using radar chart. Note: SM, straw strip mulching; PM, plastic film mulching; CK, conventional planting without mulching; GY, grain yield; KPM, kernel number per square meter; KW, kernel weight; HI, harvest index; DGR, daily growth rate; TPP, tuber number per plant; STW, single tuber weight; FTY, fresh tuber yield; ET, evapotranspiration; WUE, water use efficiency; SWS, soil water storage; ST, soil temperature; OI, output–input ratio; NI, net income; TI, total income.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 1042 KiB  
Article
Effects of Climatic Conditions and Agronomic Practices on Health, Tuber Yield, and Mineral Composition of Two Contrasting Potato Varieties Developed for High and Low Input Production Systems
by Gultekin Hasanaliyeva, Ourania Giannakopoulou, Juan Wang, Marcin Barański, Enas Khalid Sufar, Daryl Knutt, Jenny Gilroy, Peter Shotton, Halima Leifert, Dominika Średnicka-Tober, Ismail Cakmak, Levent Ozturk, Bingqiang Zhao, Per Ole Iversen, Nikolaos Volakakis, Paul Bilsborrow, Carlo Leifert and Leonidas Rempelos
Agronomy 2025, 15(1), 89; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15010089 - 31 Dec 2024
Viewed by 258
Abstract
Modern potato varieties from high-input, conventional farming-focused breeding programs produce substantially (up to 45%) lower yields when grown in organic production systems, and this was shown to be primarily due to less efficient fertilization and late blight (Phytophthora infestans) control methods [...] Read more.
Modern potato varieties from high-input, conventional farming-focused breeding programs produce substantially (up to 45%) lower yields when grown in organic production systems, and this was shown to be primarily due to less efficient fertilization and late blight (Phytophthora infestans) control methods being used in organic farming. It has been hypothesized that the breeding of potato varieties suitable for the organic/low-input sector should (i) focus on increasing nutrient (especially N) use efficiency, (ii) introduce durable late blight resistance, and (iii) be based on selection under low-input conditions. To test this hypothesis, we used an existing long-term factorial field experiment (the NEFG trials) to assess the effect of crop management practices (rotation design, fertilization regime, and crop protection methods) used in conventional and organic farming systems on crop health, tuber yield, and mineral composition parameters in two potato varieties, Santé and Sarpo mira, that were developed in breeding programs for high and low-input farming systems, respectively. Results showed that, compared to Santé, the variety Sarpo mira was more resistant to foliar and tuber blight but more susceptible to potato scab (Streptomyces scabies) and produced higher yields and tubers with higher concentrations of nutritionally desirable mineral nutrients but lower concentrations of Cd. The study also found that, compared to the Cu-fungicides permitted for late blight control in organic production, application of synthetic chemical fungicides permitted and widely used in conventional production resulted in significantly lower late blight severity in Sante but not in Sarpo mira. Results from both ANOVA and redundancy analysis (RDA) indicate that the effects of climatic (precipitation, radiation, and temperature) and agronomic (fertilization and crop protection) explanatory variables on crop health and yield differed considerably between the two varieties. Specifically, the RDA identified crop protection as a significant driver for Santé but not Sarpo mira, while precipitation was the strongest driver for crop health and yield for Sarpo mira but not Santé. In contrast, the effect of climatic and agronomic drivers on tuber mineral and toxic metal concentrations in the two varieties was found to be similar. Our results support the hypothesis that selection of potato varieties under low agrochemical input conditions can deliver varieties that combine (i) late blight resistance/tolerance, (ii) nutrient use efficiency, and (iii) yield potential in organic farming systems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Agroecology Innovation: Achieving System Resilience)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Bi-plot resulting from the RDA showing the associations between climate and agronomic explanatory variables/drivers and potato health and tuber yield response variables for the varieties Santé and Sarpo mira. Data included were from three growing seasons/years (2010, 2011, 2012). For the variety Santé, the horizontal axis 1 explains 31.7% of the variation and the vertical axis 2 a further 10.2%. For the variety Sapro mira, the horizontal axis 1 explains 24.4% of the variation and the vertical axis 2 a further 12.9%. NC, not computed. <b>Continuous explanatory variables (△): PRE</b>, precipitation; <b>RAD</b>, radiation; <b>TEMP</b>, temperature. <b>Fixed explanatory variables (▲): CP</b>, conventional crop protection; <b>OP</b>, organic crop protection; <b>CF</b>, conventional fertilization (mineral NPK); <b>OF</b>, organic fertilization (farmyard manure). <b>Response variables (<span style="color:#FF0000">▲</span>):</b> <span class="html-italic">fwy</span>, fresh weight yield, <span class="html-italic">dwy</span>, dry weight yield; <span class="html-italic">my+ST</span>, marketable fresh weight yield including tubers with scab; <span class="html-italic">my-ST</span>, marketable fresh weight yield excluding tubers with scab; <span class="html-italic">fb</span>, foliar blight (AUDPC); <span class="html-italic">tb</span>, % of tubers with tuber blight; <span class="html-italic">sc</span>, % of tubers with scab; <span class="html-italic">sl</span>, % of tubers with slug damage; gt, % of green tubers; ct, % cracked tubers.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Bi-plot resulting from the RDA showing the associations between climate and agronomic explanatory variables/drivers and potato health and tuber yield response variables for the varieties Santé and Sarpo mira. Data included were from three growing seasons/years (2010, 2011, 2012). For the variety Santé, the horizontal axis 1 explains 34.7% of the variation and vertical axis 2 a further 10.0%. For the variety Sapro mira, horizontal axis 1 explains 25.6% of the variation and vertical axis 2 a further 8.0%. NC, not computed. <b>Continuous explanatory variables (△): PRE</b>, precipitation; <b>RAD</b>, radiation; <b>TEMP</b>, temperature. <b>Fixed explanatory variables (▲): CP</b>, conventional crop protection; <b>OP</b>, organic crop protection; <b>CF</b>, conventional fertilization (mineral NPK); <b>OF,</b> organic fertilization (farmyard manure). <b>Response variables (<span style="color:#FF0000">▲</span>): <span class="html-italic">Macronutrients</span>:</b> <span class="html-italic">N</span>, nitrogen; <span class="html-italic">P</span>, phosphorus; <span class="html-italic">K</span>, potassium; <span class="html-italic">S</span>, sulfur; <span class="html-italic">Ca</span>, calcium; <span class="html-italic">Mg</span>, magnesium. <b><span class="html-italic">Micronutrients</span>:</b> <span class="html-italic">B</span>, boron; <span class="html-italic">Cu</span>, copper; <span class="html-italic">Fe</span>, iron; <span class="html-italic">Zn</span>, zinc; <b><span class="html-italic">Toxic metals</span>:</b> <span class="html-italic">Al</span>, aluminum; <span class="html-italic">Cd</span>, cadmium; <span class="html-italic">Ni</span>, nickel; <span class="html-italic">Pb</span>, lead.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 957 KiB  
Article
Winter Wheat Resilience Under Different Pre-Crop Conditions in Albeluvisol Soils
by Dalė Šumskienė, Lina Skinulienė and Donatas Klimavičius
Sustainability 2025, 17(1), 216; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17010216 - 31 Dec 2024
Viewed by 431
Abstract
One of the most popular varieties in crop farming is wheat. In Lithuania, more than 460 winter wheat varieties are registered in the State Register of Plant Varieties. One of the most popular and time-tested varieties is ‘Skagen’, which is highly valued for [...] Read more.
One of the most popular varieties in crop farming is wheat. In Lithuania, more than 460 winter wheat varieties are registered in the State Register of Plant Varieties. One of the most popular and time-tested varieties is ‘Skagen’, which is highly valued for its winter hardiness. The aim of the research is to determine the influence of different pre-crops on the winter survival of the wheat variety ‘Skagen’ in Albeluvisol soils. For the experiment, fields of the winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) variety ‘Skagen’ from farms in the Lazdijai district were chosen. The experiment was conducted from 2017 to 2018. Plant count, chlorophyll index, and weed count were evaluated. After evaluating the differences in plant density after winter, it was found that a significantly greater reduction in plant density, 98.06%, occurred after winter wheat and 97.62% after spring wheat pre-crops compared to perennial grass pre-crops. The highest chlorophyll index was in winter wheat crops, where the pre-crops were peas, winter rape, and perennial grasses, respectively, ranging from 17.78% to 19.57%. Properly selected pre-crops reduce the risk of overwintering and form a strong crop from the beginning of vegetation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Experimental locations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The trajectory of soil sampling.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Density assessment of winter wheat crops during the autumn and spring periods, 2017–2018, units m<sup>−2</sup>. Notes. <sup>a–d</sup> Different letters indicate significant differences between the treatments (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Changes in chlorophyll content in winter wheat leaves after different pre-crops, 2018. Notes. <sup>a,b</sup> Different letters indicate significant differences between the treatments (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 6508 KiB  
Article
NDVI Estimation Throughout the Whole Growth Period of Multi-Crops Using RGB Images and Deep Learning
by Jianliang Wang, Chen Chen, Jiacheng Wang, Zhaosheng Yao, Ying Wang, Yuanyuan Zhao, Yi Sun, Fei Wu, Dongwei Han, Guanshuo Yang, Xinyu Liu, Chengming Sun and Tao Liu
Agronomy 2025, 15(1), 63; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15010063 - 29 Dec 2024
Viewed by 404
Abstract
The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) is an important remote sensing index that is widely used to assess vegetation coverage, monitor crop growth, and predict yields. Traditional NDVI calculation methods often rely on multispectral or hyperspectral imagery, which are costly and complex to [...] Read more.
The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) is an important remote sensing index that is widely used to assess vegetation coverage, monitor crop growth, and predict yields. Traditional NDVI calculation methods often rely on multispectral or hyperspectral imagery, which are costly and complex to operate, thus limiting their applicability in small-scale farms and developing countries. To address these limitations, this study proposes an NDVI estimation method based on low-cost RGB (red, green, and blue) UAV (unmanned aerial vehicle) imagery combined with deep learning techniques. This study utilizes field data from five major crops (cotton, rice, maize, rape, and wheat) throughout their whole growth periods. RGB images were used to extract conventional features, including color indices (CIs), texture features (TFs), and vegetation coverage, while convolutional features (CFs) were extracted using the deep learning network ResNet50 to optimize the model. The results indicate that the model, optimized with CFs, significantly enhanced NDVI estimation accuracy. Specifically, the R2 values for maize, rape, and wheat during their whole growth periods reached 0.99, while those for rice and cotton were 0.96 and 0.93, respectively. Notably, the accuracy improvement in later growth periods was most pronounced for cotton and maize, with average R2 increases of 0.15 and 0.14, respectively, whereas wheat exhibited a more modest improvement of only 0.04. This method leverages deep learning to capture structural changes in crop populations, optimizing conventional image features and improving NDVI estimation accuracy. This study presents an NDVI estimation approach applicable to the whole growth period of common crops, particularly those with significant population variations, and provides a valuable reference for estimating other vegetation indices using low-cost UAV-acquired RGB images. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Unmanned Farms in Smart Agriculture)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Research sites and experimental field layout.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic representation of the different major reproductive stages of crops.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Flowchart of the experiment methodology.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Schematic of ResNet50 convolutional feature extraction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Contributions of different RGB image features in NDVI estimation models. Note: (<b>a</b>–<b>e</b>) show the global distribution of SHAP values of RGB image feature models for five crops: cotton, maize, rice, rape and wheat, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Feature selection results for five crops throughout the whole growth period. Note: (<b>a</b>–<b>e</b>) show the results of Pearson’s correlation coefficients between RGB image features and NDVI for five crops: cotton, maize, rice, rape and wheat, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) results of conventional feature models for estimating the whole growth stages of five crops. Left axis, solid rectangular symbols, and black solid lines: data-trained R<sup>2</sup>; right axis, solid rectangular symbols, and red solid lines: data-predicted R<sup>2</sup>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Estimation results after adding convolutional feature optimization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Optimization results for different crops throughout the whole growth period.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Comparison of estimates before and after the optimization of two maize growth stages. Note: The figure incorporates a 95% confidence interval to visually illustrate the reliability of the model’s predictions. The confidence interval for the pre-optimization model is represented in dark blue, while the post-optimization interval is shown in light red. In line with the model’s accuracy, the maize model for the second season demonstrates greater stability, with reduced data variability.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Accuracy comparison before and after convolutional feature optimization. Note: The gray diagonal lines are 1:1 lines used as a reference to analyze the accuracy of the model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Before and after convolutional feature (CF) optimization for images of different scales.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 1817 KiB  
Article
Model-Based Valuation of Ecosystem Services Using Bio-Economic Farm Models: Insights for Designing Green Tax Policies and Payment for Ecosystem Services
by Seyed-Ali Hosseini-Yekani, Stefan Tomaczewski and Peter Zander
Agriculture 2025, 15(1), 60; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15010060 - 29 Dec 2024
Viewed by 354
Abstract
The integration of ecosystem services (ESs) valuation into agricultural policy frameworks is critical for fostering sustainable land management practices. This study leverages the redesigned version of the bio-economic farm model MODAM (Multi-Objective Decision Support Tool for Agro-Ecosystem Management) to estimate the shadow prices [...] Read more.
The integration of ecosystem services (ESs) valuation into agricultural policy frameworks is critical for fostering sustainable land management practices. This study leverages the redesigned version of the bio-economic farm model MODAM (Multi-Objective Decision Support Tool for Agro-Ecosystem Management) to estimate the shadow prices of ESs, enabling the derivation of demand and supply curves for nitrate leaching and soil erosion control, respectively. Two hypothetical farms in Brandenburg, Germany—a smaller, arable farm in Märkisch-Oderland and a larger, diversified farm with livestock in Oder-Spree—are analyzed to explore the heterogeneity in shadow prices and corresponding cropping patterns. The results reveal that larger farms exhibit greater elasticity in response to green taxes on nitrate use and lower costs for supplying erosion control compared to smaller farms. This study highlights the utility of shadow prices as proxies for setting green taxes and payments for ecosystem services (PESs), while emphasizing the need for differentiated policy designs to address disparities between farm types. This research underscores the potential of model-based ESs valuation to provide robust economic measures for policy design, fostering sustainable agricultural practices and ecosystem conservation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Agricultural Policies toward Sustainable Farm Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Farmer’s demand curve for ESs <span class="html-italic">s</span> in year <span class="html-italic">t</span>. Adapted from Kaiser and Messer (2012) [<a href="#B17-agriculture-15-00060" class="html-bibr">17</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Farmer’s supply curve for ESs <span class="html-italic">d</span> in year <span class="html-italic">t</span>. Adapted from Kaiser and Messer (2012) [<a href="#B17-agriculture-15-00060" class="html-bibr">17</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Nitrate leaching demand curve of the hypothetical farm type in Märkisch-Oderland (Brandenburg, Germany) and its optimal cropping patterns simulated under different levels of a green tax. Source: Own processing, results obtained using MODAM model implemented in GAMS software (Release 48.4.0).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Nitrate leaching demand curve of the hypothetical farm type in Oder-Spree (Brandenburg, Germany) and its optimal cropping patterns simulated under different levels of a green tax. Source: Own processing, results obtained using MODAM model implemented in GAMS software (Release 48.4.0).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Nitrate leaching demand curves of two hypothetical farm types in Märkisch-Oderland and Oder-Spree. Source: Own processing, results obtained using MODAM model implemented in GAMS software (Release 48.4.0).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Erosion control supply curve of the hypothetical farm type in Märkisch-Oderland and its optimal cropping patterns simulated under different levels of a PES. Source: Own processing, results obtained using MODAM model implemented in GAMS software (Release 48.4.0).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Erosion control supply curve of the hypothetical farm type in Oder-Spree and its optimal cropping patterns simulated under different levels of a PES. Source: Own processing, results obtained using MODAM model implemented in GAMS software (Release 48.4.0).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Soil erosion control supply curves of two hypothetical farm types in Märkisch-Oderland and Oder-Spree. Source: Own processing, results obtained using MODAM model implemented in GAMS software (Release 48.4.0).</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 977 KiB  
Article
Exploring Fungal Biodiversity in Crop Rotation Systems: Impact of Soil Fertility and Winter Wheat Cropping
by Srdjan Šeremešić, Sonja Tančić Živanov, Miloš Rajković, Vladimir Aćin, Stanko Milić, Brankica Babec and Snežana Jovanović
Plants 2025, 14(1), 65; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14010065 - 28 Dec 2024
Viewed by 492
Abstract
This study investigated soil fungal biodiversity in wheat-based crop rotation systems on Chernozem soil within the Pannonian Basin, focusing on the effects of tillage, crop rotation, and soil properties. Over three years, soil samples from ten plots were analyzed, revealing significant fungal diversity [...] Read more.
This study investigated soil fungal biodiversity in wheat-based crop rotation systems on Chernozem soil within the Pannonian Basin, focusing on the effects of tillage, crop rotation, and soil properties. Over three years, soil samples from ten plots were analyzed, revealing significant fungal diversity with Shannon–Wiener diversity indices ranging from 1.90 in monoculture systems to 2.38 in a fertilized two-year crop rotation. Dominant fungi, including Fusarium oxysporum, Penicillium sp., and Aspergillus sp., showed distinct preferences for soil conditions such as pH and organic matter (OM). Conservation tillage significantly enhanced fungal diversity and richness, with the highest diversity observed in a three-year crop rotation system incorporating cover crops, which achieved an average winter wheat yield of 7.0 t ha−1—47% higher than unfertilized monoculture systems. Increased OM and nitrogen levels in these systems correlated with greater fungal abundance and diversity. Canonical correspondence analysis revealed strong relationships between fungal communities and soil properties, particularly pH and calcium carbonate content. These findings highlight the importance of tailored crop rotation and tillage strategies to improve soil health, enhance microbial biodiversity, and boost agricultural sustainability in temperate climates, providing valuable insights for mitigating the impacts of intensive farming and climate change. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Winter wheat yield (t ha<sup>−1</sup>) at the experimental field (2020–2023) MOC: WW monoculture CT; MOP: WW monoculture PT; N2P: unfertilized WW PT; N3P: unfertilized WW PT; F2C: fertilized 2-year WW CT; F2P: fertilized 2-year WW PT; F3C: fertilized 3-year WW CT; F3P: fertilized 3-year WW PT; F3Ccc: fertilized 3-year WW cover crop CT; F3Pcc: fertilized 3-year WW cover crop PT. Histogram bars marked with the same letter do not differ significantly at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The relationship of soil fungi with physical and chemical soil properties analyzed by canonical correspondence analysis (CCA): cropping systems (MOC, MOP, N2P, N3P, F2C, F2P, F3C, F3P, F3Ccc, F3Pcc,), calcium carbonate (CaCO3), organic matter (OM), total nitrogen (N), soil reaction (pHKCl) and (pHH<sub>2</sub>O), available phosphorus (AL_P2O5), available potassium (AL_K2O), the percentage of coarse sand (CS), fine sand (FS), silt (S), clay (C), sand total (ST CCA), silt and clay (SC).</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 19869 KiB  
Article
PMDNet: An Improved Object Detection Model for Wheat Field Weed
by Zhengyuan Qi and Jun Wang
Agronomy 2025, 15(1), 55; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15010055 - 28 Dec 2024
Viewed by 283
Abstract
Efficient and accurate weed detection in wheat fields is critical for precision agriculture to optimize crop yield and minimize herbicide usage. The dataset for weed detection in wheat fields was created, encompassing 5967 images across eight well-balanced weed categories, and it comprehensively covers [...] Read more.
Efficient and accurate weed detection in wheat fields is critical for precision agriculture to optimize crop yield and minimize herbicide usage. The dataset for weed detection in wheat fields was created, encompassing 5967 images across eight well-balanced weed categories, and it comprehensively covers the entire growth cycle of spring wheat as well as the associated weed species observed throughout this period. Based on this dataset, PMDNet, an improved object detection model built upon the YOLOv8 architecture, was introduced and optimized for wheat field weed detection tasks. PMDNet incorporates the Poly Kernel Inception Network (PKINet) as the backbone, the self-designed Multi-Scale Feature Pyramid Network (MSFPN) for multi-scale feature fusion, and Dynamic Head (DyHead) as the detection head, resulting in significant performance improvements. Compared to the baseline YOLOv8n model, PMDNet increased [email protected] from 83.6% to 85.8% (+2.2%) and [email protected]:0.95 from 65.7% to 69.6% (+5.9%). Furthermore, PMDNet outperformed several classical single-stage and two-stage object detection models, achieving the highest precision (94.5%, 14.1% higher than Faster-RCNN) and [email protected] (85.8%, 5.4% higher than RT-DETR-L). Under the stricter [email protected]:0.95 metric, PMDNet reached 69.6%, surpassing Faster-RCNN by 16.7% and RetinaNet by 13.1%. Real-world video detection tests further validated PMDNet’s practicality, achieving 87.7 FPS and demonstrating high precision in detecting weeds in complex backgrounds and small targets. These advancements highlight PMDNet’s potential for practical applications in precision agriculture, providing a robust solution for weed management and contributing to the development of sustainable farming practices. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Precision and Digital Agriculture)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Example of Weeds.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Example of Data Augmentation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Training Set Labels Distribution: (<b>1</b>) Category Instances (<b>2</b>) Bounding Box Shapes (<b>3</b>) Bounding Box Position (x vs. y) (<b>4</b>) Bounding Box Dimensions (width vs. height).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Network structure diagram of PMDNet model. Note: Stem is the initial preprocessing module for feature extraction; SPPF is a spatial pyramid pooling module for enhancing multi-scale contextual information. Concat merges feature maps from different layers to preserve multi-scale details; C2f is a feature fusion component derived from YOLOv8, designed to optimize feature representation. Upsampling increases spatial resolution for fine-grained localization. Downsampling reduces spatial resolution to capture high-level semantic features effectively. P3–P5 represent outputs of different layer feature maps. PKI Stage is the core module of the PKINet backbone; MultiScaleFusion is the core module of the self-designed feature fusion layer MSFPN, and DyHead serves as the detection head. These three components will be described in detail in the subsequent sections.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Structure diagram of PKI Stage. Note: FFN refers to the Feed-Forward Network, a fully connected layer used to process and transform feature representations. CAA refers to the Context Anchor Attention module, designed to capture long-range dependencies and enhance central feature regions, improving small object detection in complex backgrounds. Conv stands for a standard convolutional layer responsible for extracting local spatial features. DWConv refers to Depthwise Convolution, which reduces computation by applying spatial convolution independently to each channel, often used to build lightweight neural networks.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Structure diagram of MultiScaleFusion. Note: PWConv refers to Pointwise Convolution, a 1 × 1 convolution used to adjust the channel dimensions of feature maps, enabling efficient feature transformation and information fusion with minimal computational cost.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Structure diagram of DyHead. Note: hard sigmoid refers to an approximation of the sigmoid function to constrain values within [0, 1]; relu denotes the activation function; avg pool represents global average pooling; offset refers to self-learned offsets in deformable convolution; index indicates the corresponding channel or spatial index. Sigmoid represents the standard sigmoid function; fc stands for fully connected layers; normalize is the normalization operation applied to inputs. Symbols <span class="html-italic">α</span>1, <span class="html-italic">α</span>2, <span class="html-italic">β</span>1, and <span class="html-italic">β</span>2 represent parameters controlling channel activations and offsets.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Comparison of Training Results Between PMDNet and YOLOv8n Models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparison of Model Prediction Results. Note: The three columns in this figure represent, from left to right, the ground truth annotations, the predictions by YOLOv8n, and the predictions by PMDNet.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Field detection results of the PMDNet model in wheat fields.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 1230 KiB  
Review
Bioconversion of Poultry Litter into Insect Meal and Organic Frasstilizer Using Black Soldier Fly Larvae as a Circular Economy Model for the Poultry Industry: A Review
by Anand Raj Kumar Kullan, Arumuganainar Suresh, Hong Lim Choi, Elke Gabriel Neumann and Fatima Hassan
Insects 2025, 16(1), 12; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16010012 - 27 Dec 2024
Viewed by 395
Abstract
Poultry litter waste management poses a significant global challenge, attributed to its characteristics (odorous, organic, pathogenic, attracting flies). Conventional approaches to managing poultry litter involve composting, biogas generation, or direct field application. Recently, there has been a surge of interest in a novel [...] Read more.
Poultry litter waste management poses a significant global challenge, attributed to its characteristics (odorous, organic, pathogenic, attracting flies). Conventional approaches to managing poultry litter involve composting, biogas generation, or direct field application. Recently, there has been a surge of interest in a novel technology that involves the bioconversion of organic waste utilizing insects (known as entomoremediation), particularly focusing on black soldier fly larvae (BSFL), and has demonstrated successful transformation of various organic waste materials into insect meal and frass (referred to as organic frasstilizer). Black soldier flies have the capacity to consume any organic waste material (ranging from livestock litter, food scraps, fruit and vegetable residues, sewage, sludge, municipal solid waste, carcasses, and defatted seed meal) and convert it into valuable BSFL insect meal (suitable for animal feed) and frass (serving as an organic fertilizer). The bioconversion of poultry litter by black soldier flies offers numerous advantages over traditional methods, notably in terms of reduced land and water requirements, lower emissions, cost-effectiveness, swift processing, and the production of both animal feeds and organic fertilizers. This review focuses on the existing knowledge of BSFL, their potential in bioconverting poultry litter into BSFL meal and frass, and the utilization of BSFL in poultry nutrition, emphasizing the necessity for further innovation to enhance this sustainable circular economy approach. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Role of Insects in Human Society)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Number of document counts on “Black soldier fly” and “Black soldier fly” “Chicken” for the period of 2005–2025 from the Google Scholar database using custom range, accessed 3 July 2024 (<a href="https://scholar.google.com/" target="_blank">https://scholar.google.com/</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The circular economy concept of bioconverting poultry litter into black soldier fly larvae meal, frasstilizer, and lifecycle of black soldier fly.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop