[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (233)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = conductive yarn

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
12 pages, 4073 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Electrical Characteristics of Weft-Knitted Strain Sensors for Joint Motion Monitoring: Focus on Plating Stitch Structure
by You-Kyung Oh and Youn-Hee Kim
Sensors 2024, 24(23), 7581; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24237581 - 27 Nov 2024
Viewed by 436
Abstract
We developed a sensor optimized for joint motion monitoring by exploring the effects of the stitch pattern, yarn thickness, and NP number on the performance of knitted strain sensors. We conducted stretching experiments with basic weft-knit patterns to select the optimal stitch pattern [...] Read more.
We developed a sensor optimized for joint motion monitoring by exploring the effects of the stitch pattern, yarn thickness, and NP number on the performance of knitted strain sensors. We conducted stretching experiments with basic weft-knit patterns to select the optimal stitch pattern and analyze its sensitivity and reproducibility. The plain stitch with a conductive yarn located on the reverse side exhibited the highest gauge factor value (143.68) and achieved excellent performance, with a stable change in resistance even after repeated sensing. For an in-depth analysis, we developed six sensors using the aforementioned pattern with different combinations of yarn thickness (1-ply, 2-ply) and NP numbers (12, 13, 14). Based on bending experiments, the GF across all sensors was 60.2–1092, indicating noticeable differences in sensitivity. However, no significant differences were observed in reproducibility, reliability, and responsiveness, confirming that all the sensors are capable of joint motion monitoring. Therefore, the plain-patterned plating stitch structure with conductive yarn on the reverse side is optimal for joint motion monitoring, and the yarn thickness and NP numbers can be adjusted to suit different purposes. This study provides basic data for developing knitted strain sensors and offers insights into how knitting methods impact sensor performance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wearable Systems for Monitoring Joint Kinematics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Pattern design and knitting process for knitted strain sensor: (<b>a</b>) pattern software and computerized flat knitting machine; (<b>b</b>) methods of knitting purl and rib stitches; and (<b>c</b>) plating stitch structure for knitting plain pattern.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Preparation for bending test: (<b>a</b>) front and rear sides of knitted strain sensor connected to MCU; (<b>b</b>) E-textile flexing tester; and (<b>c</b>) circuit diagram for calculating sensor voltage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Variations in (<b>a</b>) resistance change rate and (<b>b</b>) GF with stretching; (<b>c</b>) results of five repeated stretching tests; (<b>d</b>) loop component; (<b>e</b>) contact points; (<b>f</b>) sensor surface variations and sensing mechanisms before and after stretching.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Bending test results: (<b>a</b>) 90° bending tests of six samples converted to strain rate; (<b>b</b>) GF results for 60°, 90°, and 120°; (<b>c</b>) response to bending rate changes in B1-12; (<b>d</b>) reaction time depending on bending rate for B1-12; (<b>e</b>) voltage change by angle for B1-12; 100-cycle repeated bending test of (<b>f</b>) B1-12 and (<b>g</b>) B2-12; and (<b>h</b>) voltage level according to bending state for B2-14.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Application prospects of the sensors developed in this study.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 7201 KiB  
Article
Development of Textile-Based Strain Sensors for Compression Measurements in Sportswear (Sports Bra)
by Aqsa Imran, Shahood uz Zaman, Mozzan Razzaq, Ayesha Ahmad and Xuyuan Tao
Sensors 2024, 24(23), 7495; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24237495 - 24 Nov 2024
Viewed by 580
Abstract
Women sports wearer’s comfort and health are greatly impacted by the breast movements and resultant sports bra compression to prevent excessive movement. However, as sports bras are only made in universal sizes, they do not offer the right kind of support that is [...] Read more.
Women sports wearer’s comfort and health are greatly impacted by the breast movements and resultant sports bra compression to prevent excessive movement. However, as sports bras are only made in universal sizes, they do not offer the right kind of support that is required for a certain activity. To prevent this issue, textile-based strain sensors may be utilized to track compression throughout various activities to create activity-specific designed sports bras. Textile-based strain sensors are prepared in this study using various conductive yarns, including steel, Ag-coated polyamide, and polypropylene/steel-blended threads. Various embroidery designs, including straight, zigzag, and square-wave embroidery patterns, etc., were created on knitted fabric and characterized for strain sensing efficiencies. The experiments concluded that strain sensors prepared from polypropylene/steel thread using a 2-thread square-wave design were best performed in terms of linear conductivity, sensitivity of mechanical impact, and wide working range. This best-performed sample was also tested by integrating it into the sportswear for proposed compression measurements in different body movements. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Wearables)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Microscopic images of conductive threads. (<b>a</b>) Ag-coated polyamide, (<b>b</b>) steel, (<b>c</b>) polyester/steel-blended, and (<b>d</b>) polypropylene/steel-blended.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Evolution of elongation versus electric resistance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Top view of a customized tensile tester. (<b>b</b>) Side view of a customized tensile tester. (<b>c</b>) Electrical schematic of the tester.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Experimental setup for testing.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Pattern designs: (<b>a</b>) straight, (<b>b</b>) 1-thread zigzag, (<b>c</b>) 2-thread zigzag, (<b>d</b>) 3-thread zigzag, (<b>e</b>) 1-thread square-wave, (<b>f</b>) 2-thread square-wave, and (<b>g</b>) 3-thread square-wave.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Proto samples of six pattern designs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Sample testing of the straight design in (<b>a</b>) the horizontal and (<b>b</b>) vertical directions (sample code: A0).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) Sample testing of the zigzag design in both directions (sample code: D1). (<b>b</b>) Sample testing of the square-wave design in both directions (sample code: A4).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Graph of resistance against changes in length of the Ag-coated polyamide threads (Samples A1–A6). The red straight line is the fit linear line by linear regression.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Graph of resistance against changes in length of steel threads. The red straight line is the fit linear line by linear regression.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Graph of resistance against changes in length of polypropylene/steel−blended thread. The red straight line is the fit linear line by linear regression.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Functional properties of the selected samples. (<b>a</b>) Gauge factor of the selected strain sensors, and (<b>b</b>) working range and resistance change per mm of the selected sensors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Repeatability assessment tests for samples A5 and C5.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Wash analysis for samples A5 and C5.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Prototype of the integrated sample used for the women wear analysis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Simulation of the running activity in CLO 3D. (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) various running postures.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Resistance changes by changing the bra size of sportswear (<b>a</b>) at 10 km/h., (<b>b</b>) 15 km/h., and (<b>c</b>) 20 km/h. (<b>d</b>) Resistance change for accelerating and deaccelerating.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Resistance changes by changing the bra size of sportswear after 5 washing cycles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Graphical representation of the questionnaire for comfort analysis. (<b>a</b>) Size 32C (<b>b</b>) Size 34C (<b>c</b>) Size 36C (<b>d</b>) Size 38C.</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 2849 KiB  
Article
High-Strength and Conductive Electrospun Nanofiber Yarns
by Qingqing Shao, Bo Xing, Zhaoqun Du and Weidong Yu
Polymers 2024, 16(22), 3137; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16223137 - 11 Nov 2024
Viewed by 747
Abstract
In electrospinning, nanofibers are frequently produced in nonwoven web form. Their poor mechanical properties (below 100 MPa) and difficulty in tailoring the fibrous structure have restricted their applications. However, advanced materials must be highly resistant to both deformation and fracture. By combining electrospinning [...] Read more.
In electrospinning, nanofibers are frequently produced in nonwoven web form. Their poor mechanical properties (below 100 MPa) and difficulty in tailoring the fibrous structure have restricted their applications. However, advanced materials must be highly resistant to both deformation and fracture. By combining electrospinning technology with stretching, we have overcome this disadvantage and demonstrated a polyacrylonitrile nanofiber yarn with a tensile strength of 743 ± 20 MPa. The nearly perfect uniaxial orientation of the fibrils under the stretching process is crucial for the remarkable mechanical properties of the yarn. Additionally, the nanofiber yarn was functionalized by a dip-coating process with silver nanowires (AgNWs), imparting conductive properties. This conductive, high-strength nanofiber yarn demonstrates practical applications in flexible and wearable devices. The presented strategy is versatile and can be adapted to create other high-performance nanofiber yarns, with potential uses in fields such as biomedicine and smart textiles. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Polymer Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Preparation route (<b>a</b>). SEM images of different SRs; (<b>b</b>) SR 0, (<b>c</b>) SR 3, (<b>d</b>) SR 6 and (<b>e</b>) SR 8. SEM images with higher magnification are shown in the yellow frame.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Diameter of the yarns and nanofibers at SR 0, SR 3, SR 6, and SR 8. (<b>b</b>) Alignment factor and twist angle of yarns at different SRs. (<b>c</b>) Mechanical properties, (<b>d</b>) tensile strength and (<b>e</b>) modulus of yarns at different SRs. Stress/strain curves of yarns at (<b>f</b>) SR 3, (<b>g</b>) SR 6, and (<b>h</b>) SR 8 under maximum stress of 200 MPa for 500 cycles. (<b>i</b>) Changes in strain with different SRs over 500 cycles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) WAXS spectra of yarns with different stretch ratios. (<b>b</b>) Dependence of the degree of crystallinity and crystallite size of yarns (corresponding to <a href="#polymers-16-03137-f003" class="html-fig">Figure 3</a>a) as a function of the SR. The fits of yarns at (<b>c</b>) SR 0, (<b>d</b>) SR 3, (<b>e</b>) SR 6, and (<b>f</b>) SR 8.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) curves (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) derivative thermogravimetric (DTG) curves of samples in a nitrogen atmosphere.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Preparation route of the composite yarn. SEM images of uncoated yarn (<b>b</b>) and (<b>c</b>) composite yarn. (<b>d</b>) CBS-SEM image of composite yarn. (<b>e</b>) UV/Vis absorption spectrum of the control sample and test sample after washing the composite yarn. (<b>f</b>) Stress–strain curves and (<b>g</b>) stress and strain of uncoated yarn and composite yarn.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Circuit diagram when the yarn is used as an element. (<b>b</b>) Photo showing LED light at 3 V using composite yarn as a conductive element. (<b>c</b>) Current–time curves of uncoated yarn and composite yarn. (<b>d</b>) Current of uncoated yarn and composite yarn versus the bending degree from 0° to 180°. Pictures of the bending process have been inserted.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 19204 KiB  
Article
Investigations of the Interface Design of Polyetheretherketone Filament Yarn Considering Plasma Torch Treatment
by Toty Onggar, Leopold Alexander Frankenbach and Chokri Cherif
Coatings 2024, 14(11), 1424; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings14111424 - 8 Nov 2024
Viewed by 595
Abstract
Taking advantage of its high-temperature resistance and elongation properties, conductive-coated polyetheretherketone (PEEK) filament yarn can be used as a textile-based electroconductive functional element, in particular as a strain sensor. This study describes the development of electrical conductivity on an inert PEEK filament surface [...] Read more.
Taking advantage of its high-temperature resistance and elongation properties, conductive-coated polyetheretherketone (PEEK) filament yarn can be used as a textile-based electroconductive functional element, in particular as a strain sensor. This study describes the development of electrical conductivity on an inert PEEK filament surface by the deposition of metallic nickel (Ni) layers via an electroless galvanic plating process. To enhance the adhesion properties of the nickel layer, both PEEK multifilament and monofilament yarn surfaces were metalized by plasma torch pretreatment, followed by nickel plating. Electrical characterizations indicate the potential of nickel-coated PEEK for structural monitoring in textile-reinforced composites. In addition, surface energy measurements before and after plasma torch pretreatment, surface morphology, nickel layer thickness, chemical structure changes, and mechanical properties were analyzed and compared with untreated PEEK. The thickness of the Ni layer was measured and showed an average thickness of 1.25 µm for the multifilament yarn and 3.36 µm for the monofilament yarn. FTIR analysis confirmed the presence of new functional groups on the PEEK surface after plasma torch pretreatment, indicating a successful modification of the surface chemistry. Mechanical testing showed an increase in tensile strength after plasma torch pretreatment but a decrease after nickel plating. In conclusion, this study successfully developed conductive PEEK yarns through plasma torch pretreatment and nickel plating. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>PEEK multifilament yarn (<b>a</b>) and PEEK monofilament yarn (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic representation of the simplified continuous plasma torch pretreatment system for PEEK filament yarns.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Electroless galvanic nickel plating of PEEK filament yarns.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Four-wire resistance measurement of nickel-plated PEEK filament yarns.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Chemical structure of PEEK.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>FTIR spectrum of the untreated, plasma-torch-pretreated, and nickel-plated PEEK multifilament yarns.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Possible degradation reactions on the surface of PEEK filaments during plasma torch pretreatment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>FTIR spectrum of the untreated, plasma-torch-pretreated, and nickel-plated PEEK monofilament yarns.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Determination of filament yarn diameter by light microscopy.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Light microscopy image of untreated (<b>a</b>) and plasma-torch-pretreated (<b>b</b>) PEEK multifilament yarn (sample V2).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Light microscopy image of untreated (<b>a</b>) and plasma-torch-pretreated (<b>b</b>) PEEK monofilament yarn (sample V3).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image (1000× (<b>a</b>) and 5000× (<b>b</b>)) of untreated PEEK multifilament yarn.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>SEM image (5000×) of plasma-torch-pretreated PEEK multifilament yarn; influence of increasing treatment distance (sample V1: 2 cm (<b>a</b>); sample V2: 2.5 cm (<b>b</b>) and sample V3: 3 cm (<b>c</b>)) between the plasma torch tip and PEEK surface on the surface.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>SEM image (5000×) of plasma-torch-pretreated PEEK multifilament yarn; influence of increasing yarn speed (sample V10: 1.5 m/min (<b>a</b>), sample V9: 2 m/min (<b>b</b>) and sample V8: 2.5 m/min (<b>c</b>)) during plasma torch pretreatment on the PEEK surface.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>SEM image (5000×) of plasma-torch-pretreated PEEK multifilament yarn; influence of plasma torch power (sample V2 80% (<b>a</b>) and V12 100% (<b>b</b>)) during plasma torch pretreatment on the PEEK surface.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>SEM image (200× (<b>a</b>) and 5000× (<b>b</b>)) of untreated PEEK monofilament yarn.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>SEM image (200× (<b>a</b>) and 500× (<b>b</b>)) of plasma-torch-pretreated PEEK monofilament yarn (sample V4).</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>SEM image (1000× (<b>a</b>) and 20,000× (<b>b</b>)) of nickel-plated PEEK multifilament yarn surface.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>SEM image (200× (<b>a</b>) and 10,000× (<b>b</b>)) of nickel-plated PEEK monofilament yarn.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>SEM image of the cross-section of nickel-plated PEEK multifilament yarn (<b>a</b>) and PEEK monofilament yarn (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Tensile properties of untreated, plasma-torch-pretreated, and nickel-plated PEEK multifilament yarn. Lines of different colours mean that several measurements were carried out on one sample.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Measured electrical resistivity of nickel-plated PEEK multifilament yarn and monofilament yarn as a function of yarn length.</p>
Full article ">
26 pages, 12355 KiB  
Article
Embroidered Transmission Lines with Conductive Yarns: Challenges, Modeling, Fabrication, and Experimental Performance Assessment
by Chrysanthi Angelaki, Aris Tsolis, Sofia Bakogianni and Antonis A. Alexandridis
Sensors 2024, 24(21), 6961; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24216961 - 30 Oct 2024
Viewed by 650
Abstract
This paper presents an enhanced measurement technique for evaluating embroidered transmission lines (TLs), based on a TL characterization method. The evaluation metric is the “pure” losses of the embroidered TL excluding mismatch losses. Enhanced mechanical stability and removability of embroidered samples under a [...] Read more.
This paper presents an enhanced measurement technique for evaluating embroidered transmission lines (TLs), based on a TL characterization method. The evaluation metric is the “pure” losses of the embroidered TL excluding mismatch losses. Enhanced mechanical stability and removability of embroidered samples under a test is supported by a specially designed measurement setup. Losses are used to find the effective conductivity of each embroidery pattern. Various embroidered samples are fabricated, measured, and evaluated. The repeatability of measurements and fabrication are analyzed and assessed, resulting in average deviations of 0.5 dB and 0.7 dB, respectively. A comparative evaluation of two different yarns of low and high conductivity is presented. Single and double stitching patterns for each yarn are manufactured with stitch densities of 1–7 lines/mm. For interconnection with SMA connectors, a conductive fabric contact (CFC) was selected as the finish of the TL, as a more practical interface instead of direct yarn contact (YC). The analysis of the measurements proved useful findings, such as an increase in the stitch density or the amount of yarn used does not always improve the performance; the use of double stitching greatly improves low-performance stitch densities; the effective conductivity of embroidery patterns changes with frequency; the YC interface yields more losses for medium stitch densities, but for higher stich densities, it presents an improved performance compared with the CFC interconnection. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Physical Sensors 2024)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Evaluation process of embroidered transmission lines using the proposed technique.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Double-stitch (ds) pattern formation. (<b>b</b>) Close-up of an embroidered microstrip sample with density 1 line/mm, with single and double stitching, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Copper reference sample and d4 sample.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Measurement set-up of the proposed method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>A two-port network of a microstrip line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Lockstitch formation and thread positions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Conductive fabric feeding (CFC) and yarn contact (YC) feeding techniques.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Measured loss (L[dB]) of 10 cm-long Shieldex-embroidered microstrip samples with single stitching.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Measured loss (L[dB]) of 10 cm-long Elitex-embroidered microstrip samples with single stitching.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Close-ups of sample d5 embroidered with Shieldex and Elitex yarn, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Measured forward loss factor (FLF [dB]) of 10 cm-long Elitex-embroidered microstrip samples with single stitching.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Measured loss (L[dB]) of 10 cm-long Shieldex-embroidered microstrip samples with double stitching.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Measured loss (L[dB]) of 10 cm-long Elitex-embroidered microstrip samples with double stitching.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Manufacturing repeatability (a–b samples comparison) of Shieldex- and Elitex-embroidered microstrip samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Measurement repeatability (first–second measurement comparison) of Shieldex-embroidered microstrip samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Measurement repeatability (first–second measurement comparison) of Elitex-embroidered microstrip samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>(<b>a</b>) Initial estimation of the effective conductivity of sample d4 (Shieldex), throughout the whole frequency range (0.5–4.0 GHz), and (<b>b</b>) estimation of the effective conductivity individually for each frequency region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Microscope zoomed-in photos of single-stitch embroidered patterns on the interface point for densities d1, d4, d7 for (<b>a</b>) Shieldex and (<b>b</b>) Elitex yarns.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18 Cont.
<p>Microscope zoomed-in photos of single-stitch embroidered patterns on the interface point for densities d1, d4, d7 for (<b>a</b>) Shieldex and (<b>b</b>) Elitex yarns.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Measured loss (L[dB]) of 10 cm-long Shieldex-embroidered microstrip samples with single stitching with densities equal to 4 and 7 lines/mm, employing CFC and YC feeding.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Measured loss (L[dB]) of 10 cm-long Elitex-embroidered microstrip samples with single stitching with densities equal to 4 and 7 lines/mm, employing CFC and YC feeding.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Measured loss (L[dB]) of 10 cm-long Shieldex-embroidered microstrip samples with double stitching for densities equal to 4 and 7 lines/mm, employing CFC and YC feeding.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Measured loss (L[dB]) of 10 cm-long Elitex-embroidered microstrip samples with double stitching for densities equal to 4 and 7 lines/mm, employing CFC and YC feeding.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 7533 KiB  
Article
Enhancing Force Absorption, Stress–Strain and Thermal Properties of Weft-Knitted Inlay Spacer Fabric Structures for Apparel Applications
by Mei-Ying Kwan, Yi-Fan Tu, Kit-Lun Yick, Joanne Yip, Nga Wun Li, Annie Yu and Ka-Wai Lo
Polymers 2024, 16(21), 3031; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16213031 - 29 Oct 2024
Viewed by 676
Abstract
The pursuit of materials that offer both wear comfort and protection for functional and protective clothing has led to the exploration of weft-knitted spacer structures. Traditional cushioning materials such as spacer fabrics and laminated foam often suffer from deformation under compression stresses, thus [...] Read more.
The pursuit of materials that offer both wear comfort and protection for functional and protective clothing has led to the exploration of weft-knitted spacer structures. Traditional cushioning materials such as spacer fabrics and laminated foam often suffer from deformation under compression stresses, thus compromising their protective properties. This study investigates the enhancement of the force absorption, stress–strain, and thermal properties of weft-knitted spacer fabrics with inlays. Surface yarns with superior stretchability and thermal properties are used and combined with elastic yarns in various patterns to fabricate nine different inlay samples. The mechanical and thermal properties of these samples are systematically analyzed, including their compression, stretchability, thermal comfort, and surface properties. The results show that the inlay spacer fabric exhibits superior compression properties and thermal conductivity compared to traditional laminated foam and spacer fabrics while maintaining stretchability, thus providing better performance than traditional fabrics for protective clothing and wearable cushioning products. This study further confirms that the type of inlay yarn and inlay structure are crucial factors that significantly influence the thermal, tensile, and compressive properties of the fabric. This research provides valuable insights into the design and development of advanced textile structures to improve wear comfort and protection in close-fitting apparel applications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Polymer Fibers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic of inlay fabric: (<b>a</b>) knitting notation of Pattern I, (<b>b</b>) cross-sectional view of Pattern I, (<b>c</b>) close up of Pattern I, (<b>d</b>) knitting notation of Pattern II, (<b>e</b>) cross-sectional view of Pattern II, (<b>f</b>) close up of Pattern II, (<b>g</b>) knitting notation of Pattern III, (<b>h</b>) cross-sectional view of Pattern III, and (<b>i</b>) close up of Pattern III.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Microscopic cross-sectional view: (<b>a</b>) laminated foam F1, (<b>b</b>) laminated foam F2, (<b>c</b>) spacer fabric S1, (<b>d</b>) spacer fabric S2. (<b>e</b>) inlay spacer fabric with Pattern I, (<b>f</b>) inlay spacer fabric with Pattern II, and (<b>g</b>) inlay fabric with Pattern III.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Production process of inlay fabric.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Results of tensile load for fabric elongation of 50% in the wale direction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Load-strain curves in wale direction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Results of thermal conductivity test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Compression displacement-force curves of fabrics.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Results of force reduction test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Potential application of inlay fabric as bra pads.</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 15207 KiB  
Article
Structure Design on Thermoplastic Composites Considering Forming Effects
by Wei Xie, Kai Song, Ju Yang, Fengyu Wang, Linjie Dong, Shengjie Jin, Guohua Zhu and Zhen Wang
Polymers 2024, 16(20), 2905; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16202905 - 15 Oct 2024
Viewed by 829
Abstract
Carbon fiber reinforced polypropylene (CF/PP) thermoplastics integrate the superior formability of fabrics with the recoverable characteristics of polypropylene, making them a pivotal solution for achieving lightweight designs in new energy vehicles. However, the prevailing methodologies for designing the structural performance of CF/PP vehicular [...] Read more.
Carbon fiber reinforced polypropylene (CF/PP) thermoplastics integrate the superior formability of fabrics with the recoverable characteristics of polypropylene, making them a pivotal solution for achieving lightweight designs in new energy vehicles. However, the prevailing methodologies for designing the structural performance of CF/PP vehicular components often omit the constraints imposed by the manufacturing process, thereby compromising product quality and reliability. This research presents a novel approach for developing a stamping–bending coupled finite element model (FEM) utilizing ABAQUS/Explicit. Initially, the hot stamping simulation is implemented, followed by the transmission of stamping information, including fiber yarn orientation and fiber yarn angle, to the follow-up step for updating the material properties of the cured specimen. Then, the structural performance analysis is conducted, accounting for the stamping effects. Furthermore, the parametric study reveals that the shape and length of the blank holding ring exerted minimal influence on the maximum fiber angle characteristic. However, it is noted that the energy absorption and crushing force efficiency metrics of the CF/PP specimens can be enhanced by increasing the length of the blank holding ring. Finally, a discrete optimization design is implemented to enhance the bending performance of the CF/PP specimen, accounting for the constraint of the maximum shear angle resulting from the stamping process. The optimized design resulted in a mass reduction of 14.3% and an improvement in specific energy absorption (SEA) by 17.5% compared to the baseline sample. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Mechanical property parameter characterizations of CF/PP prepregs and the CF/PP laminates: (<b>a</b>) the bias-extension equipment for the CF/PP prepreg; (<b>b</b>) the normalized shear force–shear strain curve of single CF/PP prepreg; (<b>c</b>) the bias-extension equipment for the CF/PP laminate; (<b>d</b>) the true stress–true strain curves of CF/PP laminates; and (<b>e</b>) failure positions of three different CF/PP tensile samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Manufacturing process of the hat-shaped CF/PP specimen: (<b>a</b>) the hot stamping machine and the molds; (<b>b</b>) the stamping molds and prepregs are pre-heated first, then the punch moves downwards and finishes the stamping step; the non-orthogonal cured specimen is taken out after cooling stage and trimmed to the final configuration for the further three-point bending test, the red line represents the weft yarn, and the blue line denotes the warp yarn, and the yellow arrow is the fiber direction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The three-point bending test fixtures and the typical bending responses of the CF/PP specimen: (<b>a</b>) three-point bending fixture descriptions; (<b>b</b>) force-/energy–displacement curves, deformation patterns and failure modes; and (<b>c</b>) typical historical photos of the CF/PP specimen.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The establishment and workflow diagrams of the stamping–bending coupled model: (<b>a</b>) multi-step procedure of the stamping–bending coupled analysis in ABAQUS/Explicit, in which the orthogonal fabric configuration turned into a non-orthogonal configuration in the stamping step, and then the stamping information was transferred to the subsequent structural analysis step; (<b>b</b>) the VUMAT flowchart for the stamping–bending coupled finite element model, in which the trimming and mapping VUMAT served as a connecting link between the stamping VUMAT and bending VUMAT.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The stamping–bending coupled finite element model of the hat-shaped CF/PP tube: (<b>a</b>) the stamping finite element model; (<b>b</b>) the molds removing and material trimming finite element model; and (<b>c</b>) the bending finite element model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparisons in forming and bending performances of the hat-shaped CF/PP specimen between the simulation and experiment results: (<b>a</b>) typical fiber angle variations; (<b>b</b>) force-/energy–displacement curves; (<b>c</b>) bending damage modes; and (<b>d</b>) bending deformation histories.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The influences of the cross-sectional shape on the forming and bending characteristics of the CF/PP specimens: (<b>a</b>) the diagrams of stamping molds with three different cross-sectional shapes; (<b>b</b>) the fiber yarn shear angle distributions after the stamping process; (<b>c</b>) the bending force–displacement curves; and (<b>d</b>) the ultimate damage modes and plastic deformations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The influences of the blank holding ring shapes on the forming and bending characteristics of the CF/PP specimens: (<b>a</b>) the diagrams of stamping molds with three different blank holding ring shapes; (<b>b</b>) the fiber yarn shear angle distributions after the stamping process; (<b>c</b>) the bending force–displacement curves; and (<b>d</b>) the ultimate damage modes and plastic deformations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The influences of the blank holding ring lengths on the forming and bending characteristics of the CF/PP specimens: (<b>a</b>) the diagrams of stamping molds with three different blank holding ring lengths; (<b>b</b>) the fiber yarn shear angle distributions after the stamping process; (<b>c</b>) the bending force–displacement curves; and (<b>d</b>) the ultimate damage modes and plastic deformations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Comparisons in the forming and bending performance indicators of the CF/PP specimens: (<b>a</b>) the maximum fiber angle after the stamping process; (<b>b</b>) the peak force indicator; (<b>c</b>) the energy absorption indicator; and (<b>d</b>) the crushing force efficiency indicator.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The multi-objective discrete optimization flowchart of CF/PP hat-shaped specimen accounting for the stamping process effects, in which the Taguchi approach was employed to deal with the discrete variables, and the gray relational analysis method was adopted to transform the constrained multi-objective problems into the unconstrained single-objective problems.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Iteration history of gray relational degree.</p>
Full article ">
34 pages, 1156 KiB  
Systematic Review
From Fabric to Fallout: A Systematic Review of the Impact of Textile Parameters on Fibre Fragment Release
by Jacqueline Han, Rachel H. McQueen and Jane C. Batcheller
Textiles 2024, 4(4), 459-492; https://doi.org/10.3390/textiles4040027 - 10 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1464
Abstract
With an expanding global clothing and textile industry that shows no signs of slowing, concerns over its environmental impacts follow. Fibre fragments (FFs)—short pieces of textiles that have separated from a textile construction—are a growing area of concern due to increasing evidence of [...] Read more.
With an expanding global clothing and textile industry that shows no signs of slowing, concerns over its environmental impacts follow. Fibre fragments (FFs)—short pieces of textiles that have separated from a textile construction—are a growing area of concern due to increasing evidence of their accumulation in the environment. Most of the existing research on this topic focuses on the role of consumer behaviour rather than the textiles themselves. A systematic literature review is used here to explore the key textile parameters that influence FF release. A search of articles published between 2011 and June 2024 was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Three databases (Scopus, Web of Science, and EBSCO) were used, and articles were screened to ensure that a minimum of one textile parameter was manipulated in the study. A total of 52 articles were selected and where appropriate, comparisons between samples used and key findings were made. The textile parameters that were found to reduce FF release include fibres of a longer length and higher tenacity, as well as filament yarns with low hairiness and higher twists. At the fabric level, tight fabric structures and high abrasion resistance show lower FF shedding. Mechanical finishes that reduce the number of protruding fibre ends or chemical finishes that increase abrasion resistance also prove to be beneficial. Lastly, sewing and cutting methods that enclose or seal the textile edge can reduce FF release. While optimal parameters have been identified, they are not applicable to all textile end-uses. Rather, these factors can serve as a guide during future production and be applied where possible to limit FF release. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>PRISMA flow diagram of article selection steps.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Proposed mechanism for FF release during laundering from fabrics made of polyester (<b>left</b>) and cellulosic (<b>right</b>) fibres. Loose fibres come out of the textile structure during wear and use (fuzz formation). These fibres are then broken during the laundering process by the mechanical action of the washing machine. In the presence of water and detergent, swelling of the cellulosic fibres occurs. The mechanical action on swollen fibres can cause cellulosic fibres to fibrillate and break causing further FF release (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [<a href="#B24-textiles-04-00027" class="html-bibr">24</a>]. Copyright 2019, Elsevier).</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 1488 KiB  
Article
A Comparative Analysis of Denim Fabric Performances from Cotton/Polyester Blended Rigid and Stretched Yarns
by Md Abul Shahid, Neslihan Okyay and Osman Babaarslan
Fibers 2024, 12(10), 86; https://doi.org/10.3390/fib12100086 - 9 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1106
Abstract
Cotton and polyester fiber blends are commonly used to improve the aesthetic features of finished items. The denim industry’s growing need for polyester fiber aids in analyzing the performance of denim fabrics woven from rigid and stretched weft yarn combined with cotton and [...] Read more.
Cotton and polyester fiber blends are commonly used to improve the aesthetic features of finished items. The denim industry’s growing need for polyester fiber aids in analyzing the performance of denim fabrics woven from rigid and stretched weft yarn combined with cotton and polyester. This study evaluates the weight, dimensional changes, stiffness, tensile and tearing strength, stretch, and comfort properties of denim fabric woven from cotton and polyester in various blended ratios. Here, Ne 14/1 (42 tex) 100% cotton warp yarn and Ne 18/1 (33 tex) weft yarns, consisting of 100% cotton, 75/25, 50/50, and 25/75 cotton/polyester (CO/PES) blends, as well as 100% polyester, were used to produce 3/1 Z twill denim fabric. The weft yarns were categorized into three groups: rigid, core-spun, and dual-core-spun yarns. Experimental results showed a higher polyester content in weft yarn, and denim fabrics’ tensile and tearing strength was improved, whereas fabrics’ weight loss, dimensional changes, and stretch properties were reduced. Furthermore, different statistical analyses were conducted to evaluate the type of weft yarn and blending ratio interaction and correlation with fabric properties. Additionally, a regression model was developed with the weft yarn type and blending ratio as independent variables to predict the fabric properties. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Fabrics’ dry and washed weight.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Dimensional changes in warp and weft directions of the fabric.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Tensile strength of the fabrics.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Tearing strength of fabrics.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Stiffness of the fabrics.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Stretch properties of the fabrics.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comfort properties of the fabrics.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 6099 KiB  
Article
Influence of Graphene, Carbon Nanotubes, and Carbon Black Incorporated into Polyamide Yarn on Fabric Properties
by Veerakumar Arumugam, Aleksander Góra and Vitali Lipik
Textiles 2024, 4(4), 442-458; https://doi.org/10.3390/textiles4040026 - 4 Oct 2024
Viewed by 850
Abstract
Carbon nanomaterials are increasingly being integrated into modern research, particularly within the textile industry, to significantly boost performance and broaden application possibilities. This study investigates the impact of incorporating three distinct carbon-based nanofillers—carbon nanotubes (CNTs), carbon black (CB), and graphene (Gn)—into polyamide 6 [...] Read more.
Carbon nanomaterials are increasingly being integrated into modern research, particularly within the textile industry, to significantly boost performance and broaden application possibilities. This study investigates the impact of incorporating three distinct carbon-based nanofillers—carbon nanotubes (CNTs), carbon black (CB), and graphene (Gn)—into polyamide 6 (PA6) multifilament yarns. It explores how these nanofillers affect the physical, mechanical, and thermal properties of PA6 yarns and fabrics. By utilizing melt extrusion, the nanomaterials were uniformly distributed in the yarns, and knitted fabrics were subsequently produced for detailed analysis. The research offers critical insights into how each nanofiller improves the thermal behavior of PA6-based textiles, enabling the customization of their applications. FTIR spectroscopy revealed significant chemical interactions between polyamide and carbon additives, while DSC analysis showed enhanced thermal stability, particularly with the inclusion of graphene. The introduction of these nanomaterials led to increased absorbance and decreased transmittance in the UV-Vis-NIR spectrum. Additionally, Far-Infrared (FIR) emissivity and thermal effusivity varied with different concentrations, with optimal improvements observed at specific levels. Although thermal conductivity decreased with the addition of these nanomaterials, heat management experiments demonstrated varied effects on heat accumulation and cooling times, underscoring potential applications in insulation and cooling technologies. These findings enrich the existing knowledge on nanomaterial-enhanced textiles, providing valuable guidance for optimizing PA6 yarns and fabrics for use in protective clothing, sportswear, and technical textiles. The comparative analysis offers a thorough understanding of the relationship between carbon nanomaterials and thermal properties, paving the way for innovative advancements in functional textile materials. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Extruded melt-spun multifilament yarns.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Developed fabric samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Tensile properties of yarns.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>FTIR spectra of fabrics.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis of fabrics.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Effect of additives on UV-Vis-NIR spectra of fabrics.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>FIR emissivity of fabrics.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Thermal effusivity of fabrics.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Thermal conductivity of fabrics.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Dynamic heat accumulation and release of fabrics.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 5884 KiB  
Article
Closed-Form Solutions for Current Distribution in Ladder-Type Textile Heaters
by Kaspar M. B. Jansen
Thermo 2024, 4(4), 433-444; https://doi.org/10.3390/thermo4040023 - 26 Sep 2024
Viewed by 822
Abstract
Textile heaters are made from knitted conductive yarns integrated into their fabric, making them stretchable, washable, breathable and suitable for close-to-skin wear. However, the non-zero resistance in the lead wires causes non-uniform power distribution, which presents a design challenge. To address this, the [...] Read more.
Textile heaters are made from knitted conductive yarns integrated into their fabric, making them stretchable, washable, breathable and suitable for close-to-skin wear. However, the non-zero resistance in the lead wires causes non-uniform power distribution, which presents a design challenge. To address this, the electrical performance of the heaters is modeled as an n-ladder resistor network. By using the finite difference method, simple, closed-form expressions are derived for networks with their power source connected to input terminals A1B1 and A1Bn, respectively. The exact results are then used to derive approximations and design criteria. The solutions for the ladder networks presented in this paper apply to a wider class of physical problems, such as irrigation systems, transformer windings, and cooling fins. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>Left</b>): thermal image of a knitted textile heater. (<b>Right</b>): schematic representation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Resistances for the ladder configuration with input terminals connected to <span class="html-italic">A</span><sub>1</sub><span class="html-italic">B</span><sub>1</sub>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Resistances for the diagonal configuration with input terminals connected to <span class="html-italic">A</span><sub>1</sub><span class="html-italic">B<sub>n</sub></span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Equivalent resistances for ladder configuration. Full lines are exact solutions; symbols are Simulink data; dashed lines are limiting solutions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Equivalent resistances for diagonal configuration. Full lines are exact solutions; symbols are Simulink data; dashed lines are limiting solutions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Lead wire currents for ladder configuration. Lines are exact solutions; symbols are Simulink data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Heater currents for ladder configuration. Lines are exact solutions; symbols are Simulink data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Lead wire currents for diagonal configuration. Lines are exact solutions; symbols are Simulink data and dashed lines are approximations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Heater currents for diagonal configuration. Lines are exact solutions; symbols are Simulink data. Dashed lines are the approximation according to Equation (17).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Contour plot for criterion Equation (18). Ladder configuration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>As in <a href="#thermo-04-00023-f010" class="html-fig">Figure 10</a>. Diagonal configuration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Contour plot for criterion Equation (20). Ladder configuration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>As in <a href="#thermo-04-00023-f012" class="html-fig">Figure 12</a>. Diagonal configuration. The dots are in accordance with Equation (22).</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 15802 KiB  
Article
Structural Design and Performance of Cut-Resistant Fabrics with Concave–Convex Arrays
by Fei Jiang, Ting Su, Leimei Fang, Kezheng Zhao and Honglian Cong
Polymers 2024, 16(15), 2137; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16152137 - 27 Jul 2024
Viewed by 992
Abstract
As the risk of social security increases, it is crucial to develop flexible protective materials that combine flexibility with high protective performance. Ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) was selected as the raw material, and four types of flat-knitting cut-resistant fabrics were ultimately designed and prepared [...] Read more.
As the risk of social security increases, it is crucial to develop flexible protective materials that combine flexibility with high protective performance. Ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) was selected as the raw material, and four types of flat-knitting cut-resistant fabrics were ultimately designed and prepared from a three-dimensional longitudinal dimension and concave–convex array structure based on rib knitting. A series of experiments must be conducted on fabrics in order to study the law of protection performance of different structural fabrics. They were thus subjected to comprehensive evaluation and theoretical analysis of cut resistance. The results demonstrate that the four structural fabrics exhibited resilience in abrasion tests, withstanding over 100,000 cycles without failure. A weighting algorithm was employed to determine the comprehensive cutting resistance of the S1, S2, S3, and S4 structural fabrics, resulting in values of 1939.9 gf, 2298.6 gf, 2577.1 gf, and 2822.2 gf, respectively. Therefore, S1 reached class A4, which is sufficient to address a medium cut hazard. Similarly, S2, S3, and S4 reached class A5, which is adequate to address a high cut hazard. The obtained fitting equation, with uniform yarn fineness T as the dependent variable, demonstrates that the cut resistance improved as the concave–convex density level increased. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Progress on Advanced Fibrous Materials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Design basis for cut-resistant fabrics. (<b>a</b>) Schematic diagram of the cutting angle of fabric resistance; (<b>b</b>) schematic diagram of the fabric cut resistance equation; (<b>c</b>) fabric design principle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Fabric concave–convex arrays structure diagram. (<b>a</b>) Front of fabric; (<b>b</b>) concave–convex arrays structure; (<b>c</b>) back of fabric.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Fabric knitting process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Fabric cut resistance test. (<b>a</b>) Tomodynamometer test equipment; (<b>b</b>) schematic diagram of blade cutting on fabric and cutting direction; (<b>c</b>) preparation method for cutting samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Fabric object picture.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Fabric abrasion resistance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Fabric cut resistance regression line. (<b>a</b>) Fabric 0° cut resistance regression line; (<b>b</b>) fabric 45° cut resistance regression line; (<b>c</b>) fabric 90° cut resistance regression line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Comprehensive fabric cut resistance. (<b>a</b>) Comprehensive evaluation of cut resistance of fabrics; (<b>b</b>) fabric cut resistance correlation fitting curve.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 9420 KiB  
Article
Assessment of Adhesion in Woven Fabric-Reinforced Laminates (FRLs) Using Novel Yarn Pullout in Laminate Test
by Feyi Adekunle, Ang Li, Rahul Vallabh and Abdel-Fattah M. Seyam
J. Compos. Sci. 2024, 8(7), 242; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs8070242 - 26 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1425
Abstract
Fiber-reinforced laminates with flexibility (FRLs) are becoming increasingly crucial across diverse sectors due to their adaptability and outstanding mechanical attributes. Their ability to deliver high performance relative to their weight makes them indispensable in lighter-than-air (LTA) applications, such as aerostats, inflatable antennas, surge [...] Read more.
Fiber-reinforced laminates with flexibility (FRLs) are becoming increasingly crucial across diverse sectors due to their adaptability and outstanding mechanical attributes. Their ability to deliver high performance relative to their weight makes them indispensable in lighter-than-air (LTA) applications, such as aerostats, inflatable antennas, surge bladders, gas storage balloons, life rafts, and other related uses. This research delved into employing woven fabrics as the reinforcement material and explored how their specific parameters, like fiber type, fabric count (warp thread density × weft thread density), fabric areal density, and fabric cover influence the bonding and mechanical properties of laminates. A thorough analysis encompassing standard T-peel (ASTM standard D1876) and a newly proposed yarn pullout in laminate test were conducted on laminates fabricated with various woven reinforcements, each with its unique specifications. The T-peel test was utilized to gauge the adhesive strength between FRL components, offering crucial insights into interfacial bonding within the laminates. Nevertheless, challenges exist with the T-peel test, including instances where the adherents lack the strength to withstand rupture, resulting in unsuccessful peel propagation and numerous outliers that necessitate costly additional trials. Thus, our research group introduced a novel yarn pullout in laminate test to accurately assess adhesion in FRLs. This study uncovered correlations between both adhesion tests (T-peel and yarn pullout in laminate), indicating that the innovative yarn pullout in laminate test could effectively substitute for characterizing adhesion in FRLs. Furthermore, the findings unveiled a complex relationship between woven fabric specifications and laminate properties. We noted that variations in fiber type, yarn linear density, and adhesive type significantly impacted adhesion strength. For instance, Kevlar exhibited markedly superior adhesion compared to Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) when paired with Thermoplastic Polyurethane (TPU) adhesive, whereas UHMWPE demonstrated better adhesion with Ethylene Vinyl Acetate (EVA). Moreover, the adhesion quality lessened as fabric count increased for the same adhesive quantity. These discoveries carry practical implications for material selection and design across industries, from automotive to aerospace, offering avenues to enhance FRL performance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Discontinuous Fiber Composites, Volume III)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Laminate structure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Bonding high-performance fibers with adhesives: (<b>a</b>) Kevlar and TPU, (<b>b</b>) Kevlar and EVA, and (<b>c</b>) Kevlar and EVOH [<a href="#B9-jcs-08-00242" class="html-bibr">9</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>UHMWPE atomic structure showing strong covalent C-C bonds and weak hydrogen bonds between the molecules [<a href="#B13-jcs-08-00242" class="html-bibr">13</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Microscopic images (X80) of UHMWPE woven fabrics: (<b>a</b>) UP66 and (<b>b</b>) UP80 showing different tightness levels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Test panel and specimen for T-peel test [<a href="#B19-jcs-08-00242" class="html-bibr">19</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Typical load-displacement curve for T-peel test for FRLs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Yarn pullout in laminate sample specifications.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Typical load-displacement curve for yarn pullout in laminate test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparison of adhesion using T-peel test in Kevlar and UHMWPE woven fabrics with analogous areal density.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Correlation between pullout force and peel strength for (<b>a</b>) weft samples and (<b>b</b>) warp samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Comparison of peel and yarn pullout in laminate values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Microscopic images of yarn pullout in laminate test: (<b>a</b>) KP60_EVOH before testing in X20 mag, (<b>b</b>) KP60_EVOH before testing in X40 mag, (<b>c</b>) KP60_EVOH after testing in X40 mag, (<b>d</b>) KP60_EVOH after testing in X80 mag, (<b>e</b>) UP66_TPU after testing in X20 mag, and (<b>f</b>) UP66_TPU after testing in X40 mag.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Pullout force of Kevlar samples in weft and warp directions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Microscopic images of yarn after being pulled out of laminate: (<b>a</b>) Kevlar yarn in 40× mag, (<b>b</b>) Kevlar yarn in 100× mag, (<b>c</b>) UHMWPE yarn in 40× mag, and (<b>d</b>) UHMWPE yarn in 100× mag.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14 Cont.
<p>Microscopic images of yarn after being pulled out of laminate: (<b>a</b>) Kevlar yarn in 40× mag, (<b>b</b>) Kevlar yarn in 100× mag, (<b>c</b>) UHMWPE yarn in 40× mag, and (<b>d</b>) UHMWPE yarn in 100× mag.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Pullout force of UHMWPE samples in weft and warp directions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Microscopic image of UP60 showing number of yarns in warp and weft directions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Yarn pullout in laminates KP36, KP60, KP140, and KP170, graphs for: (<b>a</b>) EVA, (<b>b</b>) TPU, and (<b>c</b>) EVOH.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17 Cont.
<p>Yarn pullout in laminates KP36, KP60, KP140, and KP170, graphs for: (<b>a</b>) EVA, (<b>b</b>) TPU, and (<b>c</b>) EVOH.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Box plot of pullout force (N).</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 3715 KiB  
Review
A Review of the Electrical Conductivity Test Methods for Conductive Fabrics
by Zeyue Xie, Heura Ventura and Monica Ardanuy
Textiles 2024, 4(3), 284-308; https://doi.org/10.3390/textiles4030017 - 22 Jun 2024
Viewed by 2091
Abstract
With the substantial growth of the smart textiles market, electrical properties are becoming a basic requirement for most of the advanced textiles used in the development of wearable solutions and other textile-based smart applications. Depending on the textile substrate, the test method to [...] Read more.
With the substantial growth of the smart textiles market, electrical properties are becoming a basic requirement for most of the advanced textiles used in the development of wearable solutions and other textile-based smart applications. Depending on the textile substrate, the test method to determine the electrical properties can be different. Unlike smart fibers and yarns, the characterization of the electrical properties of fabrics cannot be tested between two connection points because the result would not represent the behavior of the entire fabric, so the electrical properties must be related to an area. The parameters used to characterize the electrical properties of the fabrics include resistance, resistivity, and conductivity. Although all of them can be used to indicate electrical performance, there are significant differences between them and different methods available for their determination, whose suitability will depend on the function and the textile substrate. This paper revises the main parameters used to characterize the electrical properties of conductive fabrics and summarizes the most common methods used to test them. It also discusses the suitability of each method according to several intervening factors, such as the type of conductive fabric (intrinsically or extrinsically conductive), its conductivity range, other fabric parameters, or the final intended application. For intrinsically conductive woven fabrics, all the methods are suitable, but depending on the requirements of conductivity accuracy, the contact resistance from the measuring system should be determined. For intrinsically conductive knitted fabrics, two-point probe, Van der Pauw, and eddy current methods are the most suitable. And for intrinsically conductive nonwoven fabrics, two-point probe and four-point probe methods are the most appropriate. In the case of extrinsically conductive fabrics, the applied method should depend on the substrate and the properties of the conductive layer. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Smart Textiles)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Conductivity levels reported for different functions. Information compiled from several references [<a href="#B8-textiles-04-00017" class="html-bibr">8</a>,<a href="#B9-textiles-04-00017" class="html-bibr">9</a>,<a href="#B10-textiles-04-00017" class="html-bibr">10</a>,<a href="#B11-textiles-04-00017" class="html-bibr">11</a>,<a href="#B12-textiles-04-00017" class="html-bibr">12</a>,<a href="#B13-textiles-04-00017" class="html-bibr">13</a>,<a href="#B14-textiles-04-00017" class="html-bibr">14</a>,<a href="#B15-textiles-04-00017" class="html-bibr">15</a>,<a href="#B16-textiles-04-00017" class="html-bibr">16</a>,<a href="#B17-textiles-04-00017" class="html-bibr">17</a>,<a href="#B18-textiles-04-00017" class="html-bibr">18</a>,<a href="#B19-textiles-04-00017" class="html-bibr">19</a>,<a href="#B20-textiles-04-00017" class="html-bibr">20</a>,<a href="#B21-textiles-04-00017" class="html-bibr">21</a>,<a href="#B22-textiles-04-00017" class="html-bibr">22</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Scheme of the systems to measure (<b>a</b>) surface resistance and (<b>b</b>) volume resistance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Two-point probe method using an ammeter (<b>a</b>) or multimeter (<b>b</b>) to measure resistivity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The two-point probe method used: (<b>a</b>) rectangle probe (<b>b</b>) concentric ring probe.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Test circuit of circular probe (<b>a</b>) surface resistance (<b>b</b>) volume resistance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Strip electrodes in ASTM D257 [<a href="#B48-textiles-04-00017" class="html-bibr">48</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Four-point probe method to measure resistivity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>In line four-point probe method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Measured system of the Van der Pauw method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Measured system of eddy current method: (<b>a</b>) measuring device; and (<b>b</b>) working principle showing the primary magnetic field generated by the coil in a black dotted line, the secondary magnetic field produced by the induced currents in orange dotted lines, and the Eddy currents (electrical currents produced in the fabric) in blue dotted lines.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Measured system using eddy current method in ISO 24584 [<a href="#B85-textiles-04-00017" class="html-bibr">85</a>] with a removable sensor (<b>a</b>) or a non-removable sensor (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Measured system using eddy current method in IEC 62899-202-3 [<a href="#B86-textiles-04-00017" class="html-bibr">86</a>] with (<b>a</b>) a dual probe or (<b>b</b>) a single probe.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>They are composed of intrinsically and extrinsically conductive fabrics (Note: results were obtained for the search on the Web of Science of: “conductive woven fabric”, “conductive knitted or conductive knitting”, “conductive nonwoven”, “conductive fabric and coating (topic)”, “conductive fabric and printing (topic)”, “conductive fabric and in situ (topic)”, “conductive fabric and dipping (topic)”, “conductive fabric And deposition (topic)”, “conductive fabric and spraying (topic)”, “conductive fabric and plating (topic)”, from 2015 to 2024).</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 6156 KiB  
Article
Modern Electromagnetic-Radiation-Shielding Materials Made Using Different Knitting Techniques
by Zbigniew Mikołajczyk, Iwona Nowak, Łukasz Januszkiewicz, Monika Szewczyk and Joanna Junak
Materials 2024, 17(13), 3052; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17133052 - 21 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1158
Abstract
This paper summarizes the possibility of employing knitted textile barriers as a shield against electromagnetic fields to protect the human body from their negative impact. Ten variants of knitted fabrics made of electrically conductive yarns, steel, and copper wire that differed in stitch [...] Read more.
This paper summarizes the possibility of employing knitted textile barriers as a shield against electromagnetic fields to protect the human body from their negative impact. Ten variants of knitted fabrics made of electrically conductive yarns, steel, and copper wire that differed in stitch pattern, structural parameters, and raw material, were designed, manufactured, and tested. The knitted fabrics produced differed in structural parameters, including course and wale density, surface density, thickness, thread length in the loop, wale and course take-up, volume cover factor, and surface porosity. These parameters were examined in accordance with the research methodology used in knitting. Barrier measurements were taken in the direction of the wales and in the direction of the courses for two frequencies of electromagnetic fields: 2–4 GHz and 4–7 GHz. It was observed that the shielding effectiveness of the manufactured materials depends on the structural parameters of the fabric, the stiches applied, and the type of yarn. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Microscope thread images: (<b>a</b>) Shieldex, 150 dtex; (<b>b</b>) Shieldex, 340 dtex; (<b>c</b>) Amman, 120 dtex; (<b>d</b>) Shieldex, 600 dtex; (<b>e</b>) Cu wire; (<b>f</b>) steel wire, (<b>g</b>) scale for sample yarn.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Single-bearing cylindrical crochet machine (cylinder diameter = 4″; needle number <span class="html-italic">NE</span> = 14; number of needles, <span class="html-italic">L</span> = 169; number of revolutions, n = 50–200/min). (<b>a</b>) Full view of the machine; (<b>b</b>) view of the cylinder.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Cylindrical double-bearing crochet machine from Mayer &amp; Cie (cylinder diameter = 30″; gauge pitch = 1.27 mm; needle number, <span class="html-italic">NE</span> = 20; number of needles, <span class="html-italic">L</span> = 2 × 1872).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The HKS 3 warp-knitting machine from Karl Mayer, with needle number <span class="html-italic">NE</span> = 28.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Measurement station equipped with a microscope and view system; (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>) examples of determining the length of yarn in a stitch. (A dozen or so points lying on the yarn axis in the loop were manually marked. The program then automatically connected the dots and approximated them in the form of a curve. After determining the yarn axis, the result of the thread length in the stitch was shown).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Measuring station for determining experimental porosity; (<b>b</b>) histogram made by the TEXTIL-STUDIO program.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) Actual view of the knitted fabric; (<b>b</b>) binary image of knitted fabric.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Electric field orientation in waveguides: (<b>a</b>) coaxial; (<b>b</b>) rectangular in fundamental mode.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Measurement setup.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>(<b>a</b>) The WR284 waveguide; (<b>b</b>) the WR159 waveguide.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Microscope images of knitted fabrics: (<b>a</b>) knitted fabric 1 (variant 1); (<b>b</b>) knitted fabrics 2 and 3; (<b>c</b>) knitted fabric 4; (<b>d</b>) knitted fabric 5; (<b>e</b>) knitted fabric 6; (<b>f</b>) knitted fabric 7; (<b>g</b>) knitted fabric 8; (<b>h</b>) kitted fabric 9; (<b>i</b>) knitted fabric 10 (magnification 4.4×).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Attenuation along courses, frequency range 2–4 GHz.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Attenuation along courses, frequency range 4–7 GHz.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Attenuation along wales, frequency range 2–4 GHz.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Attenuation along wales, frequency range 4–7 GHz.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop