[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (1)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Tongtianmiao pluton

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
20 pages, 9384 KiB  
Article
Petrogenetic Implications of the Lithium-Rich Tongtianmiao Granite Pluton, South China: Evidence from Geochemistry and Geochronology
by Xinhui Yu, Yongzhang Zhou, Wei Cao, Hanyu Wang, Can Zhang, Lifeng Zhong, Wu Wei, Zhiqiang Wang, Jianying Yao, Zhiqiang Chen and Qinghe Xu
Minerals 2024, 14(7), 637; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14070637 - 21 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1065
Abstract
The South China Block, a region renowned for its extensive granite distribution and rich metal deposits, serves as a natural laboratory for the study of granite-related mineralization. This research focuses on the Tongtianmiao granite pluton, which is located at the intersection of the [...] Read more.
The South China Block, a region renowned for its extensive granite distribution and rich metal deposits, serves as a natural laboratory for the study of granite-related mineralization. This research focuses on the Tongtianmiao granite pluton, which is located at the intersection of the Qin-Hang and Nanling metallogenic belts and has been confirmed as a significant lithium mineral resource. Despite its discovery and ongoing development, the lithium-rich Tongtianmiao pluton has been understudied, particularly concerning its petrogenesis, which has only recently come to the forefront of scientific inquiry. By integrating an array of petrogeochemical data with geochronological studies derived from zircon and monazite dating, this study provides insights into the magmatic processes related to lithium enrichment in the Tongtianmiao granites. The Tongtianmiao granites are classified as A-type granites characterized by high SiO2 contents (69.18–78.20 wt.%, average = 74.08 wt.%), K2O + Na2O contents (4.59–8.34 wt.%, average = 6.86 wt.%), A/CNK > 1.2, and low concentrations of Ca, Mg, and Fe. These granites are enriched in alkali metals such as Li, Rb, and Cs but are significantly depleted in Ba, Sr, and Eu. They show no significant fractionation of light or heavy rare-earth elements but present characteristic tetrad effects. A finding of this study is the identification of multiple ages from in situ zircon U–Pb dating, which implies a prolonged history of magmatic activity. However, given the high uranium content in zircons, which could render U–Pb ages unreliable, emphasis is placed on the monazite U–Pb ages. These ages cluster at approximately 172.1 ± 1.1 Ma and 167.9 ± 1.6 Ma, indicating a Middle Jurassic period of granite formation. This timing correlates with the retreat of the Pacific subduction plate and the associated NE-trending extensional fault activity, which likely provided favorable conditions for lithium enrichment. The study concluded that the Tongtianmiao granites were formed through partial melting of crustal materials and subsequent underplating by mantle-derived materials, and were contaminated by strata materials. This process resulted in the formation of highly differentiated granite through magmatic differentiation and external forces. These findings have significant implications for understanding the petrogenesis of lithium-rich granites and are expected to inform future exploration endeavors in the Tongtianmiao pluton. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geological sketch map of the South China Block (modified from Chen et al., 1989 [<a href="#B28-minerals-14-00637" class="html-bibr">28</a>], Zhou et al., 2012 [<a href="#B21-minerals-14-00637" class="html-bibr">21</a>]), showing the distribution of Yanshanian granitic plutons. The map is presented in the WGS84 coordinate system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Geological sketch showing the strata and intrusion distribution in the Xianghualing ore field (modified from Yuan et al., 2008 [<a href="#B14-minerals-14-00637" class="html-bibr">14</a>]); (<b>b</b>) geological sketch showing the horizontal distribution of sampling boreholes ZK6404, ZK7412 and ZK8203, CRS: WGS84.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Photographs and micrographs of representative rocks: (<b>a</b>) lithium-rich mica quartz vein; (<b>b</b>) zinnwaldite specimen; (<b>c</b>) fine-grained zinnwaldite granite veins intersecting medium-grained zinnwaldite granite; (<b>d</b>) grain size variation and greisen vein in zinnwaldite granite; (<b>e</b>) greisen; (<b>f</b>) albitized zinnwaldite granite; (<b>g</b>) zinnwaldite granite; (<b>h</b>) biotite monzonitic granite; (<b>i</b>) sericitized granite thin section; (<b>j</b>) zinnwaldite granite thin section; (<b>k</b>) greisen thin section; (<b>l</b>) altered quartz-enriched granite thin section. Pl—plagioclase, Kfs—potassium feldspar, Qz—quartz, Znw—zinnwaldite, Ms—muscovite, Bt—biotite, Ser—sericite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Geologic cross sections of drill holes ZK6404, ZK7412 and ZK8203 showing the spatial relationships among different rocks and sampling locations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Plots of SiO<sub>2</sub> vs. (<b>a</b>) Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>; (<b>b</b>) Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub><sup>T</sup>; (<b>c</b>) MnO; (<b>d</b>) MgO; (<b>e</b>) CaO; (<b>f</b>) Na<sub>2</sub>O; (<b>g</b>) Rb; (<b>h</b>) Sr; and (<b>i</b>) Ba for the Tongtianmiao granitic rocks and other intrusions in the Xianghualing ore field (data obtained from previous research [<a href="#B7-minerals-14-00637" class="html-bibr">7</a>,<a href="#B8-minerals-14-00637" class="html-bibr">8</a>,<a href="#B11-minerals-14-00637" class="html-bibr">11</a>,<a href="#B18-minerals-14-00637" class="html-bibr">18</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Chemical classification of Tongtianmiao plutonic rocks using the total alkali versus silica (TAS) diagram, modified from Middlemost (1994) [<a href="#B38-minerals-14-00637" class="html-bibr">38</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub> vs. K<sub>2</sub>O diagram, modified from Peccerillo and Taylor (1976) [<a href="#B39-minerals-14-00637" class="html-bibr">39</a>]; (<b>b</b>) A/CNK versus A/NK plots of granites from the Tongtianmiao pluton, based on the diagram of Maniar and Piccoli (1989) [<a href="#B40-minerals-14-00637" class="html-bibr">40</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) The primitive mantle normalized diagram of trace elements and (<b>b</b>) the chondrite-normalized REE patterns, with normalization values from Sun and McDonough (1989) [<a href="#B41-minerals-14-00637" class="html-bibr">41</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Zircon CL images of samples ZK7412-1 and ZK7412-5.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Monazite CL images of samples ZK7412-5 and ZK7412-6.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Monazite U–Pb ages of sample ZK7412-5.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Monazite U–Pb ages of sample ZK7412-6.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Granite discrimination diagram of granite genetic type (modified from [<a href="#B55-minerals-14-00637" class="html-bibr">55</a>]): (<b>a</b>) 10,000 Ga/Al vs. Zr; (<b>b</b>) Zr + Nb + Ce + Y vs. FeO<sup>T</sup>/MgO; (<b>c</b>) 10,000 Ga/Al vs. Ce; (<b>d</b>) Zr + Nb + Ce + Y vs. (Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O)/CaO. FG—fractionated felsic granite; OTG—other I-, S- and M-type granite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Granite discrimination diagram of the tectonic setting (modified from [<a href="#B62-minerals-14-00637" class="html-bibr">62</a>]): (<b>a</b>) Y vs. Nb; (<b>b</b>) Yb vs. Ta. Syn-COLG—syn-collisional granite; VAG—volcanic arc granite; ORG—ocean ridge granite; WPG—within plate granite; MORG—mantle-derived ocean ridge granite.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop