[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (46)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Syrphidae

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
66 pages, 27848 KiB  
Article
Climate Change Influences on Central European Insect Fauna over the Last 50 Years: Mediterranean Influx and Non-Native Species
by Attila Haris, Zsolt Józan, Péter Schmidt, Gábor Glemba, Bogdan Tomozii, György Csóka, Anikó Hirka, Peter Šima and Sándor Tóth
Ecologies 2025, 6(1), 16; https://doi.org/10.3390/ecologies6010016 - 13 Feb 2025
Viewed by 1704
Abstract
The Central European fauna, in the last decades, has been undergoing a strong transformation due to four main factors: the retreat of living organisms that require cool and wet habitats, the proliferation of organisms that thrive in warm and dry conditions, the northward [...] Read more.
The Central European fauna, in the last decades, has been undergoing a strong transformation due to four main factors: the retreat of living organisms that require cool and wet habitats, the proliferation of organisms that thrive in warm and dry conditions, the northward migration of Mediterranean organisms, and the gradual establishment of plants and animals with tropical origins. In this study, we detail the changes in the orders Diptera, Hymenoptera, and Lepidoptera and analyze the establishment of non native insects and the northward migration of Mediterranean insect species. The transformation towards a Mediterranean-type fauna is prominently indicated by the population in total abundance increase of xerothermic Aculeata, bee flies (Bombyliidae), and horse flies (Tabanidae). Additionally, groups that require cool and wet ecological conditions, particularly hoverflies (Syrphidae), but also sawflies (Tenthredinidae) and tachinid flies (Tachinidae), have shown a notable decline. In nocturnal moths, we observe a decrease in species richness in certain areas, as well as frequent outbreaks in populations of some less climate-sensitive species. Some species of butterflies are less sensitive to the current extent of climate change, exhibiting significant population in total abundance growth under protected conditions. However, most of the previously sporadic and rare butterfly species have proven to be climate-sensitive, unable to achieve significant population in abundance growth even under strict nature conservation. In recent decades, the influx from Mediterranean regions and the establishment of tropical non native insect species have turned at an exponential rate. We have reviewed the presence of alien insect species, recording 803 alien insect species in our region; 298 of them have arrived in the past quarter-century, with a significant proportion (54%) originating from tropical and Mediterranean regions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers of Ecologies 2024)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The <span class="html-italic">Graphocephala fennahi</span> Young, 1977 (Rhododendron Leafhopper), native to North America, were first found on the leaves of Rhododendron catawbiense in Hungary in 2012. It well illustrates the role of alien insect species in the transformation of our fauna (photo: György Csóka).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Biogeographic map of the investigated area. Pannonian (brown), Continental (green), and Alpine biogeographic regions (violet). (source: EEA [<a href="#B7-ecologies-06-00016" class="html-bibr">7</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Hydrogeological map of the Carpathian Basin (source: [<a href="#B8-ecologies-06-00016" class="html-bibr">8</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Average annual temperatures of three Central European countries between 1970 and 2023. Green: Hungary, orange: Romania, red: Slovakia. Climatic data from World Bank Portal [<a href="#B19-ecologies-06-00016" class="html-bibr">19</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Long-term trend of horse-flies (Tabanidae) in the Carpathian Basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Long-term declining trend of hoverflies (Syrphidae) in the Carpathian Basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Long-term increasing trend of xerotherm bee flies (Bombyliidae) in the Carpathian Basin, winners of the warming climatic conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Long-term trend of tachinid flies (Tachinidae) in the Carpathian Basin. General declining trend with strong fluctuation probably typical for parasitoids.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Long-term trend of species richness of Bumblebees in the high (blue) and low (red) elevations of the Carpathian Basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Long-term trend of wild bee families in the Carpathian Basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Long-term trend of Bembecidae, Psenidae, Sphecidae and Pemphedronidae in the Carpathian Basint.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Long-term trend of Chrysididae, Philantidae and Crabronidae in the Carpathian Basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Long-term trend of numbers of specimens of sawflies (Symphyta) by Malaise trap method based on Haris et al., 2024 [<a href="#B6-ecologies-06-00016" class="html-bibr">6</a>]. Sawflies are primarily distributed in northern and montane regions, mostly inhabiting moderately cool, rainy areas.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Long-term trend of species richness of sawflies (Symphyta) by Malaise trap method based on Haris et al., 2024 [<a href="#B6-ecologies-06-00016" class="html-bibr">6</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p><span class="html-italic">Aglais urticae</span> (Linnaeus, 1758) (Small Tortoiseshell) was once common until the late 1980s. In the last decades, it nearly disappeared from the deeper region of the Carpathian Basin (photo: Ádám Gór).</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p><span class="html-italic">Brintesia circe</span> (Fabricius, 1775) (Great Banded Grayling) has successfully resisted climate change so far (photo: Péter Schmidt).</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Some butterflies, like <span class="html-italic">Iphiclides podalirius</span> (Linnaeus, 1758) (Scarce Swallowtail), have even been able to increase their abundance in Central Europe (Photo: Gábor Glemba).</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Changes in nocturnal macrolepidoptera populations in total abundance between 1970 and 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Changes in nocturnal macrolepidoptera populations in total abundance between 2014 and 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Changes in species richness of nocturnal macrolepidoptera between 1970 and 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Timeline of non-native insects in the Carpathian Basin from the Neolithic period till 2024.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Timeline of the introduction of tropical insect species.</p>
Full article ">Figure 23
<p>Division of non-native insects according to their taxonomic groups.</p>
Full article ">Figure 24
<p>Division of non-native insects according to their origin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 25
<p><span class="html-italic">Ovalisia festiva</span> (Linnaeus, 1767) (Cypress Jewel Beetle) had double colonization: natural and introduction with ornamental plants (photo: György Csóka).</p>
Full article ">Figure 26
<p>Timeline of the influx of Mediterranean insect species.</p>
Full article ">Figure 27
<p>Long-term trend of wild bees in Belgium’s aboundances (after Duchenne et al. [<a href="#B202-ecologies-06-00016" class="html-bibr">202</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 28
<p>The <span class="html-italic">Parnassius mnemosyne</span> (Linnaeus, 1758) (Clouded Apollo) appears stable in our region (photo: Gábor Glemba).</p>
Full article ">Figure 29
<p>Different types of increase of insect populations in abundance as a response to climate change (yellow: exponential growth of invasive insect, red: moderate population growth after the temperature optimum, blue: continuous growth of abundance of xerotherm insect).</p>
Full article ">Figure 30
<p>Different types of decline of insect abundances as a response to climate change (yellow: exponential decline of highly sensitive insects of climate change, red: gradual decline of population in abundance of hylophilous insects, blue: disappearance of climate change-sensitive butterfly species).</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 5890 KiB  
Article
Identification of Diverse Bacteriophages Associated with Bees and Hoverflies
by Rohan A. Bandoo, Simona Kraberger, Cahit Ozturk, Michael C. Lund, Qiyun Zhu, Chelsea Cook, Brian Smith and Arvind Varsani
Viruses 2025, 17(2), 201; https://doi.org/10.3390/v17020201 - 30 Jan 2025
Viewed by 543
Abstract
Bacteriophages are the most numerous, ubiquitous, and diverse biological entities on the planet. Prior studies have identified bacteriophages associated with pathogenic and commensal microbiota of honeybees. In this study we expand on what is known about bacteriophages from the lineages Caudoviricetes, Inoviridae [...] Read more.
Bacteriophages are the most numerous, ubiquitous, and diverse biological entities on the planet. Prior studies have identified bacteriophages associated with pathogenic and commensal microbiota of honeybees. In this study we expand on what is known about bacteriophages from the lineages Caudoviricetes, Inoviridae, and Microviridae, which are associated with honeybees (Apidae, Apis mellifera), solitary bees of the genus Nomia (Halictidae, Nomia), and hoverflies (Syrphidae). The complete genomes of seven caudoviruses, seven inoviruses, and 288 microviruses were assembled from honeybees (n = 286) and hoverflies in Arizona (n = 2). We used bacterial host predictive software and sequence read mapping programs to infer the commensal and transient bacterial hosts of pollinating insects. Lastly, this study explores the phylogenetic relationships of microviruses sampled from bees, opportunistically sampled pollinating insects such as hoverflies, and blackflies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Bacterial Viruses)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Map showing sampling sites for honeybees, solitary bees, and hoverflies for this study. The top left panel shows all three sampling regions in a larger map of North America and the Caribbean. The top right panel shows an enlargement of the Caribbean Island of Jamaica. The bottom two panels show enlargements of Arizona and Wisconsin in the USA. Sampling sites are displayed by colored circles based on insect type and location sampled.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Individual ViPTree clusters depicting the proteomic relationships of (<b>A</b>) wisapiscaud virus 1 (PQ490692) and (<b>B</b>) wisapiscaud virus 2 (PQ490692) together with representative sequences from the class <span class="html-italic">Caudoviricetes.</span> The virus and putative hosts are shown next to the tree. The linearized genomes with their open reading frames are shown with some of the conserved protein-coding genes highlighted in different colors. Those in bold represent genome sequences from this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Individual ViPTree clusters depicting the proteomic relationships of (<b>A</b>) ariapiscaud virus 1 (PQ490687), (<b>B</b>) ariapiscaud virus 2 (PQ490688), and (<b>C</b>) ariapiscaud virus 3 (PQ490689) together with representative sequences from the class <span class="html-italic">Caudoviricetes.</span> The virus and putative hosts are shown next to the tree. The linearized genomes with their open reading frames are shown with some of the conserved protein-coding genes highlighted in different colors. Those in bold represent genome sequences from this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Individual ViPTree clusters depicting the proteomic relationships of (<b>A</b>) ariapiscaud virus 4 (PQ490690) and (<b>B</b>) ariapiscaud virus 5 (PQ490691) together with representative sequences from the class <span class="html-italic">Caudoviricetes.</span> The virus and putative hosts are shown next to the tree. The linearized genomes with their open reading frames are shown with some of the conserved protein-coding genes highlighted in different colors. Those in bold represent genome sequences from this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>A ViPTre depicting the relationship of representative sequences of the family <span class="html-italic">Inoviridae</span> with the assembled inovirus genomes from this study. The putative virus and hosts are shown next to the tree. The linearized genomes with their open reading frames are shown with some of the conserved protein-coding genes highlighted in different colors. Those in bold represent genome sequences from this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>A circular ViPTree visualized in ITOL with the putative grouping determined using vConTACT 2. The branches of the tree are annotated by colors representing the groupings. Honeybee and hoverfly microvirus genomes from this study along with those previously identified from honeybees [<a href="#B15-viruses-17-00201" class="html-bibr">15</a>] and blackflies [<a href="#B61-viruses-17-00201" class="html-bibr">61</a>] are highlighted in a color strip around the tree.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Summary of the microvirus genomes identified in this study from honeybees and hoverflies as well as those from honeybees by Kraberger et al. (2019) [<a href="#B15-viruses-17-00201" class="html-bibr">15</a>] and blackflies by Kraberger et al. (2019) [<a href="#B61-viruses-17-00201" class="html-bibr">61</a>], based on vConTACT 2 and ViPTree clustering.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>A</b>) Summary of presence/absence matrix of caudovirus, inovirus, and microvirus sequences across all samples when present in at least two sample pools. Matrix for all viruses is provided in <a href="#app1-viruses-17-00201" class="html-app">Supplementary Materials, Figure S9</a>. Viruses were considered present in a sample pool if at least 25% of the genome had read coverage. (<b>B</b>) A circo-plot displaying the connection to sample pools that showed the presence of the virus in sample pools where the virus was first identified is displayed at the bottom of the read mapping array. Sample location identities and color schemes are displayed according to the legend on the bottom left.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 3003 KiB  
Article
Water Deprivation and Sowing Times Alter Plant–Pollination Interactions and Seed Yield in Sunflower, Helianthus annuus L. (Asteraceae)
by Qasim Ali, Mudssar Ali, Fawad Zafar Ahmad Khan, Ahmed Noureldeen, Akram Alghamdi, Hadeer Darwish, Akash Fatima, Ahmad Ibrahim Jalali, Kit Prendergast and Shafqat Saeed
Plants 2024, 13(22), 3194; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13223194 - 14 Nov 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1428
Abstract
Climate change effects, including temperature extremes and water stress, cause abiotic stress in plants. These changes directly affect flowering and the flower reward system for pollinators, influencing plant–pollinator interactions and ultimately seed production in flowering plants. Here, we tested the effects of water [...] Read more.
Climate change effects, including temperature extremes and water stress, cause abiotic stress in plants. These changes directly affect flowering and the flower reward system for pollinators, influencing plant–pollinator interactions and ultimately seed production in flowering plants. Here, we tested the effects of water deprivation on the behavior of various pollinator species, plant–pollinator interactions, and the seed yield of sunflower, Helianthus annuus L. (Asteraceae). Sunflower was sown during four different months (January–April) and subjected to two different water availability levels (well-watered and water-deprived). Pollinator abundance was recorded five times a day (8:00 am, 10:00 am, 12:00 pm, 2:00 pm, and 4:00 pm) from flower heads and the florets. In addition, foraging behavior was also recorded. We found that lowest abundance, visit duration, and visitation rate occurred in April-sown sunflower. The European honey bee Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) was the most abundant visitor to sunflower, the hover fly Eristalinus aeneus (Diptera: Syrphidae) exhibited the longest visit duration, while Xylocopa sp. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) exhibited the highest visitation rate. The visitation rate of bees was significantly affected by water stress, with more bee visits occurring under well-watered conditions. Additionally, plant parameters, including flower head diameter, head weight, seed number, and seed weight, were significantly lower in the water-deprived treatments in April-sown sunflower. Open flowers without the pollination exclusion cages showed a higher yield, indicating the pollination dependence of sunflower. In conclusion, the plant modifications induced by sowing months and water-deprived conditions may alter pollinator behavior and may ultimately affect sunflower yield. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Development and Morphogenesis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Pollinator abundance on sunflower: (<b>A</b>) sowing months of the crop, (<b>B</b>) water regimes, (<b>C</b>) bee pollinators. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean (SEM) across replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments based on the LSD test at a 5% significance level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Visit duration of pollinators on sunflower: (<b>A</b>) sowing months of the crop, (<b>B</b>) water regimes, and (<b>C</b>) pollinator species. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean (SEM) across replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments based on the LSD test at a 5% significance level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Visitation rate of pollinators on sunflower floret: (<b>A</b>) sowing months of the crop, (<b>B</b>) water regimes, and (<b>C</b>) pollinator species. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean (SEM) across replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments based on the LSD test at a 5% significance level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Visitation rate of pollinators on sunflower head: (<b>A</b>) sowing months of the crop, (<b>B</b>) water regimes, and (<b>C</b>) pollinator species. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean (SEM) across replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments based on the LSD test at a 5% significance level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Yield parameters of sunflower in different sowing months, (<b>A</b>) head diameter, (<b>B</b>) head weight, (<b>C</b>) seed number, and (<b>D</b>) seed weight. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean (SEM) across replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments based on the LSD test at a 5% significance level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Effect of water regimes on different yield parameters of sunflower (<b>A</b>) head diameter, (<b>B</b>) head weight, (<b>C</b>) seed number, and (<b>D</b>) seed weight. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean (SEM) across replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Effect of pollination types on different yield parameters of sunflower (<b>A</b>) head diameter, (<b>B</b>) head weight, (<b>C</b>) seed number, (<b>D</b>) seed weight. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean (SEM) across replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 7835 KiB  
Article
Reproductive Biology in the Possible Last Healthy Population of Parodia rechensis (Cactaceae): Perspectives to Avoid Its Extinction
by Rafael Becker, Rosana Farias-Singer, Diego E. Gurvich, Renan Pittella, Fernando H. Calderon-Quispe, Júlia de Moraes Brandalise and Rodrigo Bustos Singer
Plants 2024, 13(20), 2890; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13202890 - 15 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1048
Abstract
All 32 Brazilian species of Parodia Speg (Cactaceae) occurring in Rio Grande do Sul State are considered threatened, according to the IUCN criteria. Until 2021, Parodia rechensis (CR) was known by only two small populations. However, a new population with over 400 individuals [...] Read more.
All 32 Brazilian species of Parodia Speg (Cactaceae) occurring in Rio Grande do Sul State are considered threatened, according to the IUCN criteria. Until 2021, Parodia rechensis (CR) was known by only two small populations. However, a new population with over 400 individuals was discovered in 2021, prompting the study of its reproductive biology as a way to promote its conservation. Anthesis, breeding system, and natural pollination were studied in the field. The breeding system was studied by applying controlled pollination treatments to plants excluded from pollinators (bagged). Germination features were studied at the Seed Bank of the Porto Alegre Botanical Garden under controlled temperatures (20, 25, and 30 °C). The anthesis is diurnal and lasts for up to four days. The flowers offer pollen as the sole resource to the pollinators. The study species is unable to set fruit and seed without the agency of pollinators and has self-incompatible (unable to set fruit and seeds when pollinated with pollen of the same individual) characteristics that can considerably restrict its reproduction. Native bees of Halictidae and Apidae (Hymenoptera) are the main pollinators, with a smaller contribution of Melyridae (Coleoptera) and Syrphidae (Diptera). Natural fruit set is moderate (≤64%, per individual), but the species presents vegetative growth, producing several branches from the mother plant. Seeds showed the optimum germination rate at 20 °C and an inhibition of 75% in germinability at 30 °C. Our findings suggest the need to manage the species’ habitat to guarantee the permanency of the plants and healthy populations of pollinators as well. Our findings raise concerns about the germination and establishment of new individuals in the context of rising temperatures caused by climate change. Suggestions for the possible management of the extant populations are made. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pollination in a Changing World)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>General appearance of <span class="html-italic">Parodia rechensis</span> in its habitat. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Flowers with orange perianth elements. (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) Flowers with yellow perianth elements. (<b>e</b>) Plants of both phenotypes in the environment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p><span class="html-italic">Parodia rechensis</span> habitat. (<b>a</b>) Area of the type population discovered in 1968. (<b>b</b>) New population discovered in 2021.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Average frequency of pollinator interaction with <span class="html-italic">Parodia rechensis</span> flowers at 60-min intervals.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Insect pollinators in <span class="html-italic">Parodia rechensis</span>. (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">Augochlora</span> sp. (Halictidae); (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">Ceratina</span> sp. (Apidae); (<b>c</b>) Syrphidae; and (<b>d</b>) Melyridae.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Boxplot graphics showing the variation in height (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>), width (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>), and number of branches (<b>g</b>–<b>i</b>) of <span class="html-italic">Parodia rechensis</span> during 12 months. In yellow is the group exposed to the sun, and in gray is the shaded group. T1: initial measurement (October/2022); T2: period between October/2022 and April/2023; T3: period between April/2023 and October/2023. Significant <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values are indicated in their respective boxplots. (ns): non-significant <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value at 5%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Temperature in Caxias do Sul, Brazil, between 1961 and 2024. Mean maximum temperature for October–January (blue); historical mean maximum temperature (orange) (INMET, 2024).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p><span class="html-italic">Parodia rechensis</span> location. (<b>a</b>) Rio Grande do Sul state map with phytogeographic domain borders, following IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística). (<b>b</b>) general aspect of Mixed Ombrofilous Forest, an Atlantic Rainforest biome; (<b>c</b>) general aspect of Pampa grasslands.</p>
Full article ">
27 pages, 11103 KiB  
Article
Resolving the Taxonomy of Mountain Syrphidae (Diptera) in the Iberian Peninsula: The Species Group of Cheilosia melanura Becker, 1894
by Iván Ballester-Torres, Zorica Nedeljković, Pablo Aguado-Aranda, Ante Vujić, María Ángeles Marcos-García and Antonio Ricarte
Insects 2024, 15(9), 640; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15090640 - 26 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1136
Abstract
The largest genus of Palaearctic Syrphidae, Cheilosia Meigen, 1822 (Syrphidae: Rhingiini), is currently under revision in the Ibero-Balearic region (Iberian Peninsula + Balearic Islands). Prior to this study, various species groups with putative phylogenetic support were defined for this genus of complex taxonomy. [...] Read more.
The largest genus of Palaearctic Syrphidae, Cheilosia Meigen, 1822 (Syrphidae: Rhingiini), is currently under revision in the Ibero-Balearic region (Iberian Peninsula + Balearic Islands). Prior to this study, various species groups with putative phylogenetic support were defined for this genus of complex taxonomy. The group of Cheilosia melanura Becker, 1894 includes species distributed all over Europe, with some of these species being similar each other in both morphology and genetics. After recent fieldwork in different Iberian localities and consultation of entomological collections, a new species from Sierra Nevada (Granada, Spain) was uncovered, described, and illustrated. Data on diagnostic characters, intraspecific variability, and adult biology were also provided. Maximum likelihood analyses of the fragment “C” of the 5′ end of the cytochrome c oxydase subunit I (COI-5′) and complete COI-5′ were performed to explore and support morphological species concepts within the group. The Spanish-endemic Cheilosia andalusiaca Torp Pedersen, 1971 is recognised here to be part of the C. melanura group based both on morphological and molecular evidence. Cheilosia carbonaria Egger, 1860 and Cheilosia cynocephala Loew, 1840 from the Iberian Peninsula are reported for the first time based on specimens originating in the Spanish Pyrenees. An identification key for the Iberian species of the C. melanura group is provided. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Systematics, Phylogeny and Evolution)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Map of the localities (red circles) sampled between 2021 and 2024 in the Iberian Peninsula and the Balearic Islands.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Location of the Sierra Nevada and distribution of the sampled localities (black circles) in the present <span class="html-italic">Cheilosia</span> study. The outer black line represents the border of the Sierra Nevada Natural Park, whilst the darkened area corresponds with the National Park area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Maximum Likelihood tree based on COI-5′ of Iberian and European specimens of the <span class="html-italic">Cheilosia melanura</span> group. DNA vouchers for own sequences are highlighted in bold. DNA vouchers for the new species are grouped in a blue rectangle. Bootstrap values of &gt;50 are shown near nodes. Branch lengths are measured in numbers of substitutions per site.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Maximum Likelihood tree based on fragment “C” of COI-5′ of Iberian and European specimens of the <span class="html-italic">Cheilosia melanura</span> group. DNA vouchers for own sequences are highlighted in bold. DNA vouchers for the new species and <span class="html-italic">Cheilosia andalusiaca</span> are each grouped in a blue rectangle. Bootstrap values of &gt;50 are shown near nodes. Branch lengths are measured in numbers of substitutions per site.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p><span class="html-italic">Cheilosia triamilia</span> Ballester-Torres, Ricarte, and Nedeljković sp. nov. (<b>A</b>) Holotype, male, dorsal view. (<b>B</b>) Holotype, male, lateral view. (<b>C</b>) Paratype (CEUA00114370), female, dorsal view. (<b>D</b>) Paratype, female, lateral view. Scale bars: (<b>A</b>,<b>C</b>) 2.5 mm; (<b>B</b>,<b>D</b>) 2.5 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p><span class="html-italic">Cheilosia triamilia</span> Ballester-Torres, Ricarte, and Nedeljković sp. nov. (<b>A</b>) Holotype, male, antenna, lateral view. (<b>B</b>) Paratype, female, antenna, lateral view. Scale bars: (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) 0.25 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p><span class="html-italic">Cheilosia triamilia</span> Ballester-Torres, Ricarte, and Nedeljković sp. nov.; measurements of the described characters (<b>A</b>) Paratype, female. (<b>B</b>) Holotype, male. Abbreviations: bl = body length; bw = body width; ec = eye contiguity length; ft = frontal triangle length; wl = wing length. Scale bars = (<b>A</b>) 2.5 mm; (<b>B</b>) 1 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p><span class="html-italic">Cheilosia triamilia</span> sp. nov., male genitalia, holotype. (<b>A</b>) Hypandrium with right gonostylus, lateral view. (<b>B</b>) Epandrium with right surstylus, lateral view. (<b>C</b>) Epandrium, dorsal view. Abbreviations: dl: dorsal lobe of gonostylus; s la: surstylus lamella; vl: ventral lobe of gonostylus. Scale bar (<b>A</b>–<b>C</b>): 250 µm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Distribution of <span class="html-italic">Cheilosia triamilia</span> sp. nov. in the Sierra Nevada mountain range (white dots). The outer black line represents the limits of the Natural Park of Sierra Nevada, whilst the darkened area corresponds with the National Park area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p><span class="html-italic">Cheilosia andalusiaca</span> Torp Pedersen, 1971, male genitalia (based on CEUA00016731). (<b>A</b>) Hypandrium with the right gonostylus, lateral view. (<b>B</b>) Epandrium with the right surstylus, lateral view. Abbreviations: dl: dorsal lobe of the gonostylus; s la: surstylus lamella; vl: ventral lobe of the gonostylus. Scale bar: (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) 250 µm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p><span class="html-italic">Cheilosia carbonaria</span> from Sant Joan de Toran, Lleida, Spain. (<b>A</b>) Female, dorsal view. (<b>B</b>) Female, lateral view. Scale bar: (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) 2.5 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p><span class="html-italic">Cheilosia cynocephala</span> from Portillo de Eraize, Navarra, Spain. (<b>A</b>) Male, lateral view. (<b>B</b>) Female, dorsal view. Scale bars: (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) 2.5 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Heads of species of the <span class="html-italic">Cheilosia melanura</span> group in posterior view. (<b>A</b>). <span class="html-italic">Cheilosia bergenstammi</span>, male (<b>B</b>). <span class="html-italic">Cheilosia triamilia</span> sp. nov., male. Red arrows indicate the presence of hairs (<b>C</b>). <span class="html-italic">Cheilosia bracusi,</span> male. Scale bars: (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) 0.5 mm; (<b>C</b>) 0.75 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Hind legs of species of the <span class="html-italic">Cheilosia melanura</span> group to show the colour and pilosity of the tibia, anterior view (except for (<b>C</b>), posterior view; (<b>E</b>), dorsal view) (<b>A</b>). <span class="html-italic">Cheilosia fraterna,</span> male. (<b>B</b>). <span class="html-italic">Cheilosia triamilia</span> sp. nov., female. (<b>C</b>). <span class="html-italic">Cheilosia triamilia</span> sp. nov., female. (<b>D</b>). <span class="html-italic">Cheilosia bracusi,</span> male. (<b>E</b>). <span class="html-italic">Cheilosia bracusi,</span> male. Red arrows indicate the presence of long hairs. Scale bars: (<b>A</b>,<b>E</b>) 0.75 mm; (<b>B</b>,<b>C</b>) 0.5 mm; (<b>D</b>) 1 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Hind legs of <span class="html-italic">Cheilosia andalusiaca,</span> highlighting the variability in the tibia colour<span class="html-italic">,</span> anterior view. (<b>A</b>). Male with a completely black tibia. (<b>B</b>). Female with a basally orange tibia. (<b>C</b>). Male with an orange tibia at both ends. Scale bars: (<b>A</b>–<b>C</b>) 0.75 mm.</p>
Full article ">
41 pages, 1934 KiB  
Article
Changes in Population Densities and Species Richness of Pollinators in the Carpathian Basin during the Last 50 Years (Hymenoptera, Diptera, Lepidoptera)
by Attila Haris, Zsolt Józan, Ladislav Roller, Peter Šima and Sándor Tóth
Diversity 2024, 16(6), 328; https://doi.org/10.3390/d16060328 - 3 Jun 2024
Viewed by 4028
Abstract
Temporal changes in population densities and species richness of three main pollinator groups—moths and butterflies (Lepidoptera); bees, wasps and sawflies (Hymenoptera); and hoverflies, horseflies, tachinids and bee flies (Diptera)—were investigated in the Carpathian Basin. Maintaining pollinator diversity is a crucial factor for preserving [...] Read more.
Temporal changes in population densities and species richness of three main pollinator groups—moths and butterflies (Lepidoptera); bees, wasps and sawflies (Hymenoptera); and hoverflies, horseflies, tachinids and bee flies (Diptera)—were investigated in the Carpathian Basin. Maintaining pollinator diversity is a crucial factor for preserving our biodiversity and ecosystems; furthermore, several pollinator species have a strong economic role in maintaining crop and fruit cultures. Our conclusions are based on our three and four decades of faunistic surveys in various regions of the Carpathian Basin. Analyzing and comparing our data with the historical data of the last 50 years, we concluded that densities of some pollinators declined during the past decade and a half (Symphyta, hoverflies), although populations of several species of Mediterranean origin grew (Aculeata) and new species even migrated from the warmer regions. In numerous cases, this decrease was dramatic: more than 90% decline of certain butterfly species were detected. On the other hand, the composition of pollinator fauna significantly changed due to the disappearance of some mountainous or mesophile species. The main reason for the decrease in pollinator communities is due partly to climatic change and partly to anthropogenic factors. Different groups of pollinators react differently: some groups like Syrphidae, Tachinidae, most of the butterfly families and bumblebees suffered a strong decline in the last two decades; other warm-loving groups like most of Aculeata and horseflies and bee flies showed a significant increase in population densities. Our conclusion: in our region, the pollinator crisis is present but moderate; however, there is a clear sign of the gradual transition of our pollinator fauna towards the Mediterranean type. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emerging Effects of Pollinator Loss on Biodiversity)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>National average annual temperatures between 1970 and 2023 in Hungary with a trend line (based on the data supply of the Hungarian Meteorological Service).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Sampling points of lepidoptera between 1970 and 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Changes in sawfly populations between 1991 and 2021 with a trend line and equation (based on <a href="#diversity-16-00328-t002" class="html-table">Table 2</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Changes in Aculeata populations between 1988 and 2023 with a trend line and equation (based on <a href="#diversity-16-00328-t005" class="html-table">Table 5</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Changes in moth populations between 1970 and 2023 with two trend lines: from 1970 and from the 2014 break point (based on <a href="#diversity-16-00328-t016" class="html-table">Table 16</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Changes in moth species richness between 1970 and 2023 with a trend line and equation (based on <a href="#diversity-16-00328-t017" class="html-table">Table 17</a>).</p>
Full article ">
27 pages, 368 KiB  
Review
White Mustard, Sweet Alyssum, and Coriander as Insectary Plants in Agricultural Systems: Impacts on Ecosystem Services and Yield of Crops
by Gedyon Tamiru Mena and Janina Gospodarek
Agriculture 2024, 14(4), 550; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14040550 - 30 Mar 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2320 | Correction
Abstract
The main reason for adding plants to accompany the main crop is to protect it from pests and diseases. We reviewed the effectiveness of white mustard (Sinapis alba L.), sweet alyssum (Lobularia maritima L.), and coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) in [...] Read more.
The main reason for adding plants to accompany the main crop is to protect it from pests and diseases. We reviewed the effectiveness of white mustard (Sinapis alba L.), sweet alyssum (Lobularia maritima L.), and coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) in this regard. White mustard proximity had a strong positive influence on the occurrence of Syrphidae, parasitoids, Coccinellidae, and Carabidae, as well as on the fertility of Syrphidae and the longevity of parasitoids—all of which are essential for biological pest control. It also reduced many pests and diseases. The influence of S. alba on yield depends on the spacing used and the species of protected plant. Sweet alyssum positively affected the occurrence of Syrphidae, Coccinellidae, Anthocoridae, epigeal, and soil fauna, as well as the longevity of parasitoids and Anthocoridae. Its effect on the crop yield is variable, depending on the references consulted. The sensitivity of L. maritima to Phyllotreta spp. excludes it as a companion plant for hosts of these pests. Coriander positively affected the occurrence of Chrysopidae, Coccinellidae, Staphylinidae, and Aranea, as well as the longevity of parasitoids and the egg-laying of Syrphidae. It also reduced some crop pests. Introduction of the reviewed plants can improve the biodiversity of beneficial entomofauna that can help control pests and reduce diseases, with benefits to crop and yield. The use of synthetic insecticides can thus be greatly reduced, though it is not always possible to avoid them completely. Full article
18 pages, 11524 KiB  
Article
Unveiling the Mainland vs. Insular Variability of the Eumerus barbarus Species Group (Diptera: Syrphidae) in the Western Mediterranean Basin
by Pablo Aguado-Aranda, Antonio Ricarte, Zorica Nedeljković, Martin Hauser, Scott Kelso, Lucía Sainz-Escudero, Jeffrey H. Skevington and María Ángeles Marcos-García
Insects 2024, 15(4), 239; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15040239 - 29 Mar 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1484
Abstract
Comprising nearly 300 described species, Eumerus Meigen, 1822, is one of the most speciose syrphid genera worldwide, and its taxonomic diversity is remarkable in the Mediterranean basin. The Eumerus barbarus (Coquebert, 1804) group consists of four species in the western Mediterranean. Although the [...] Read more.
Comprising nearly 300 described species, Eumerus Meigen, 1822, is one of the most speciose syrphid genera worldwide, and its taxonomic diversity is remarkable in the Mediterranean basin. The Eumerus barbarus (Coquebert, 1804) group consists of four species in the western Mediterranean. Although the phenotypic variability of this species group has been commented on in previous studies, it has never been contrasted with molecular data. In the present work, the morphological variation found in 300+ specimens of this species group from the western Mediterranean is explored and tested against the COI mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). The highest phenotypic disparity was found in E. barbarus and Eumerus sulcitibius Rondani 1868. The integrative approach has not revealed cryptic diversity within the species E. barbarus but in E. sulcitibius. As a result, a new species close to E. sulcitibius was discovered, Eumerus sardus Aguado-Aranda, Ricarte & Hauser sp. n., from Sardinia, Italy. The new insular species is here described, illustrated, and discussed. A total of twenty-three haplotypes of COI mtDNA were identified amongst the analyzed Mediterranean specimens of E. barbarus, whereas two and five haplotypes were distinguished in the Iberian specimens of E. sulcitibius and Eumerus gibbosus van Steenis, Hauser & van Zuijen, 2017, respectively. Moreover, the first known barcodes of E. gibbosus and Eumerus schmideggeri van Steenis, Hauser & van Zuijen, 2017 were obtained, and the distribution ranges of all species are mapped. An updated dichotomous key to the males of the E. barbarus group from the western Mediterranean is provided. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Systematics, Phylogeny and Evolution)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p><span class="html-italic">Eumerus barbarus</span>, vertical triangle and scutum, pilosity (male): (<b>a</b>) mainly golden-yellow (but black on the ocellar triangle); (<b>b</b>) black on the vertical triangle anteriorly and intermixed on the scutum; (<b>c</b>) black on vertical triangle and intermixed on the scutum. Scale bar = 750 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p><span class="html-italic">Eumerus barbarus</span>, variation in the shape of the cercus of genitalia (male). An arrow indicates the triangular expansion. Scale bar = 250 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p><span class="html-italic">Eumerus barbarus</span>, scutum, pilosity (female): (<b>a</b>) short yellow hairs; (<b>b</b>) long yellow hairs; (<b>c</b>) black and yellow hairs intermixed. An arrow indicates the black hairs. Scale bar = 1 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p><span class="html-italic">Eumerus barbarus</span>, variation in the basoflagellomere coloration, male: (<b>a</b>) reddish orange, (<b>b</b>) blackish brown; female: (<b>c</b>) reddish orange, (<b>d</b>) blackish brown. Scale bar = 750 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Maximum Likelihood tree based on COI-5′. We included only one sequence of each haplotype of <span class="html-italic">E. sulcitibius</span> from the eastern Mediterranean. DNA vouchers of specimens analyzed for this work are highlighted in bold. Bootstrap values &gt;70 are shown near nodes. Branch lengths are measured in the number of substitutions per site.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Maximum Likelihood tree based on COI (COI-5′+COI-3′). DNA vouchers of specimens analyzed for this work are highlighted in bold. Bootstrap values &gt; 70 are shown near nodes. Branch lengths are measured in the number of substitutions per site.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Haplotype network of <span class="html-italic">E. barbarus</span> from the western Mediterranean based on COI-5′ sequence data (see <a href="#app1-insects-15-00239" class="html-app">Supplementary Material S3</a>). Size of circles is proportional to the number of individuals. Black dots depict the number of mutational steps. Three loops were removed in the network. Numbers of the haplotypes are indicated close to the circles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Haplotype network of <span class="html-italic">E. sulcitibius</span> from the Mediterranean area based on COI-5′ sequence data (see <a href="#app1-insects-15-00239" class="html-app">Supplementary Material S3</a>). Size of circles is proportional to the number of individuals. Black dots depict the number of mutational steps. Numbers of the haplotypes are indicated close to the circles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p><span class="html-italic">Eumerus sardus</span> sp. n., holotype (male), habitus: (<b>a</b>) dorsal view, (<b>b</b>) lateral view; head: (<b>c</b>) dorsal view, (<b>d</b>) lateral view. Scale bars = (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) 1 mm; (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) 750 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p><span class="html-italic">Eumerus sardus</span> sp. n., holotype (male), genitalia: (<b>a</b>) hypandrium, lateral view; (<b>b</b>) epandrium, lateral view. <span class="html-italic">Eumerus sulcitibius</span>, male, genitalia: (<b>c</b>) surstylus, lateral view. Legend: asl, anterior surstylar lobe; n, notch; pe, pointed expansion; psl, posterior surstylar lobe; te, triangular expansion. Scale bar = 250 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Distribution range of <span class="html-italic">E. sardus</span> sp. n.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Distribution range of <span class="html-italic">E. barbarus</span> in the western Mediterranean basin. Magnifications: (<b>a</b>) Province of Alicante, (<b>b</b>) Mallorca, (<b>c</b>) Menorca. Red dots indicate new records, green dots indicate confirmed literature records, and blue dots indicate unconfirmed literature records.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Distribution range of <span class="html-italic">E. sulcitibius</span> in the Ibero-Balearic area. Red dots indicate new records, green dots indicate confirmed literature records, and blue dots indicate unconfirmed literature records.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Distribution range of <span class="html-italic">E. gibbosus</span>. Red dots indicate new records and yellow dots indicate literature records.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Distribution range of <span class="html-italic">E. schmideggeri</span>. Red dots indicate new records and yellow dots indicate literature records.</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 1294 KiB  
Article
Artificial Adult Diet as a New Tool for Improving a Biocontrol Program with Predatory Hoverflies
by Noémie Gonzalez, Marc Fournier, Rosemarije Buitenhuis and Eric Lucas
Agriculture 2024, 14(4), 527; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14040527 - 27 Mar 2024
Viewed by 1281
Abstract
Syrphine hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphinae) are important predators of aphids in agricultural crops. While the use of flowering plants to enhance their efficacy is well established, recent research has developed an artificial diet for adult hoverflies consisting of a sugar solution and pollen in [...] Read more.
Syrphine hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphinae) are important predators of aphids in agricultural crops. While the use of flowering plants to enhance their efficacy is well established, recent research has developed an artificial diet for adult hoverflies consisting of a sugar solution and pollen in a dispenser. To ensure that the artificial diet is suitable to support hoverfly reproduction, a comparative analysis was conducted between a natural diet of flowering buckwheat plants versus an artificial diet consisting of artificial flowers (including honey solution and pollen), complemented by a sugar solution disperser. The study evaluated the fecundity, fertility, oviposition period, egg hatchability, and overall lifespan of the American hoverfly, Eupeodes americanus (Wiedemann 1830). The results indicate that the artificial diet does not negatively impact the reproductive parameters of E. americanus when compared to the buckwheat-based diet. Consequently, artificial diets emerge as a promising and more convenient alternative to flowering plants to support hoverflies in biological control strategies and for their mass rearing in research facilities and commercial insectaries. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Pest Control Strategies in Agroecosystems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Buckwheat diet treatment (<b>left</b>) and artificial diet treatment composed of one artificial flower and one sugar water disperser (<b>right</b>) for feeding a pair of the American hoverfly, <span class="html-italic">E. americanus</span> (modified from Gonzalez et al. [<a href="#B29-agriculture-14-00527" class="html-bibr">29</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Oviposition of <span class="html-italic">E. americanus</span> females under different adult diets (i.e., buckwheat or artificial diet), (<b>a</b>) daily and lifetime fecundity (i.e., number of eggs laid), (<b>b</b>) total fertility (i.e., number of hatched eggs), and (<b>c</b>) oviposition period in days (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 15). The letters indicate the significant differences with an alpha = 0.05 (Wilcoxon test), “ns” indicate non-significant differences. The lines represent the mean ± SE.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Kaplan–Meier survival curves of females (solid lines) and males (dashed lines) <span class="html-italic">E. americanus</span> reared under artificial diet (orange colors) and buckwheat diet (green colors). Shade-colored areas indicate a 95% confidence interval computed from the medians of Kaplan–Meier survival curves. There were no significant differences among genders or treatments.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 1458 KiB  
Article
Predation and Biocontrol Potential of Eupeodes corollae Fabricius (Diptera: Syrphidae) on Wheat Aphids
by Shanshan Jiang, Hui Li, Hainuo Wang, Xiaoxia Liu and Kongming Wu
Agronomy 2024, 14(3), 600; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14030600 - 16 Mar 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1149
Abstract
Wheat aphids are major pests of wheat and a significant threat to global food security. Eupeodes corollae Fabricius is one of the dominant species of wheat field hoverflies, but its ability and role in wheat aphid control lack systematic research. This study on [...] Read more.
Wheat aphids are major pests of wheat and a significant threat to global food security. Eupeodes corollae Fabricius is one of the dominant species of wheat field hoverflies, but its ability and role in wheat aphid control lack systematic research. This study on the predatory function responses of E. corollae to Rhopalosiphum padi Linnaeus, Schizaphis graminum Rondani, and Sitobion miscanthi, Takahashi showed that the maximum daily predation (1/Th) of 2nd instar E. corollae larvae was 166.67, 125.00, and 142.86, and that of 3rd instar larvae was 333.33, 250.00, and 250.00, respectively. The cage simulation test indicated that the wheat aphid population decline rate was 100% at the 60th hour of inoculation of 3rd instar E. corollae larvae at a 1:100 ratio. Eupeodes corollae exhibited a predatory relationship with all three wheat aphid species in the wheat fields of Hebei Province, China, and the corrected predation detection rates of E. corollae larvae against R. padi, S. graminum, and S. miscanthi were 12.36%, 1.08%, and 28.77% in 2022, and 6.74%, 0.82%, and 37.56% in 2023, respectively. The results of this study clarify the predatory ability of E. corollae on wheat aphids and the predatory relationship between them and provide technical support for the management of wheat aphids using the bio-control ecological service function of E. corollae. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pest and Disease Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The predation amount of 2nd or 3rd instar <span class="html-italic">E. corollae</span> larvae on <span class="html-italic">R. padi</span> (<b>A</b>), <span class="html-italic">S. graminum</span> (<b>B</b>), and <span class="html-italic">S. miscanthi</span> (<b>C</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The number of aphid populations under different treatments. Numbers in the <span class="html-italic">X</span>-axis represent the hours since the beginning of the experiment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The predation detection rate of <span class="html-italic">R. padi</span> (<b>A</b>), <span class="html-italic">S. graminum</span> (<b>B</b>), and <span class="html-italic">S. miscanthi</span> (<b>C</b>) in <span class="html-italic">E. corollae</span> larvae at different digestion times.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The corrected predation detection rate of <span class="html-italic">R. padi</span>, <span class="html-italic">S. graminum</span>, and <span class="html-italic">S. miscanthi</span> in <span class="html-italic">E. corollae</span> larvae collected from the field in 2022 (<b>A</b>) and 2023 (<b>B</b>). Numbers in the X axis represent the sampling date. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different wheat aphid species on the same sampling date.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 53661 KiB  
Article
First Morpho-Functional Assessment of Immature Stages of Pelecocera Species (Diptera: Syrphidae) Feeding on False Truffles
by José J. Orengo-Green, M. Ángeles Marcos-García, Leif Bloss Carstensen and Antonio Ricarte
Insects 2024, 15(3), 191; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15030191 - 13 Mar 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1762
Abstract
With 14 species, Pelecocera Meigen, 1822 is a scarce and small genus of hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae: Rhingiini) from the Holarctic Region. Apart from the finding of larvae of Pelecocera (Chamaesyrphus) japonica (Shiraki, 1956) in fungi in Japan, the larval biology of [...] Read more.
With 14 species, Pelecocera Meigen, 1822 is a scarce and small genus of hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae: Rhingiini) from the Holarctic Region. Apart from the finding of larvae of Pelecocera (Chamaesyrphus) japonica (Shiraki, 1956) in fungi in Japan, the larval biology of these hoverflies is virtually unknown. The early stages of all Pelecocera species are undescribed. The adults of Pelecocera (Pelecocera) tricincta Meigen, 1822 and Pelecocera (Chamaesyrphus) lugubris Perris, 1839 are found in Palearctic conifer forests with sand dunes. We here report the first morphological evidence of the immature stages of Pelecocera (P. lugubris and P. tricincta), as well as specific data on their breeding sites. Larvae of both species were collected feeding on the hypogean basidiomycete Rhizopogon luteolus Fr. & Nordholm, 1817 in Denmark in 2021. The first larval stage and second larval stage of P. tricincta, the third larval stage of P. lugubris, the anterior respiratory process, and the posterior respiratory process of the puparia of these two species were analyzed and studied using stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscope techniques. The chaetotaxy of the puparium of each species is also described and illustrated. A taxonomic diagnosis of the larvae of the genus Pelecocera is proposed to separate them from the larvae of other genera of the tribe. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Systematics, Phylogeny and Evolution)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Localities where <span class="html-italic">Pelecocera</span> larvae were found in Denmark. Legend: white circle indicates <span class="html-italic">Pelecocera (Chamaesyrphus) lugubris</span>; black circle indicates <span class="html-italic">Pelecocera (Pelecocera) tricincta</span> and <span class="html-italic">P. lugubris</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Examples of sampling area: (<b>A</b>) Hvidbjerg Klitplantage; (<b>B</b>) Lild Klitplantage (Photos: Leif Bloss Carstensen).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p><span class="html-italic">Pelecocera</span> adults reared from larvae collected in Hvidbjerg Klitplantage and Svinkløv Klitplantage, Denmark: (<b>A</b>) Male of <span class="html-italic">Pelecocera (Chamaesyrphus) lugubris</span>; (<b>B</b>) Female of <span class="html-italic">Pelecocera (Pelecocera) tricincta</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Second stage larva (L2) of <span class="html-italic">Pelecocera (Pelecocera) tricincta</span>: (<b>A</b>) Dorsal view; (<b>B</b>) Lateral view. Dash arrows indicate locomotory prominences.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Drawing of the head skeleton of a second stage larva (L2) of <span class="html-italic">Pelecocera (Pelecocera) tricincta</span>: (<b>A</b>) Lateral view; (<b>B</b>) Ventral view. Legend: Dc, dorsal cornu; Mh, mouth hook; Ml, mandibular lobe; P, pharyngeal ridges; Tb, tentorial bar; Vc, ventral cornu.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Prothorax ventral view of a second stage larva (L2) larva of <span class="html-italic">Pelecocera (Pelecocera) tricincta</span>. A dash circle indicates the antenna-maxillary organs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Anterior respiratory process of a second stage larva (L2) larva of <span class="html-italic">Pelecocera (Pelecocera) tricincta</span>, dorsal-lateral view.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Posterior respiratory process of a second stage larva (L2) and puparium of <span class="html-italic">Pelecocera</span> species: (<b>A</b>) Puparium of <span class="html-italic">Pelecocera (Pelecocera) tricincta</span>, lateral view (stereomicroscope image); (<b>B</b>) Puparium of <span class="html-italic">Pelecocera (Chamaesyrphus) lugubris</span>, lateral view (stereomicroscope image); (<b>C</b>) L2 of <span class="html-italic">Pelecocera (Pelecocera) tricincta</span>, dorsal view (SEM) image.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Posterior respiratory process of pupae of <span class="html-italic">Pelecocera species</span>: (<b>A</b>) <span class="html-italic">Pelecocera (Pelecocera) tricincta</span>, polar view (stereomicroscope image); (<b>B</b>) <span class="html-italic">Pelecocera (Chamaesyrphus) lugubris</span>, polar view (stereomicroscope image); (<b>C</b>) <span class="html-italic">Pelecocera (Pelecocera) tricincta</span>, polar view (drawing). Legend: Interspiracular setae indicated with an arrow; perispiracular gland indicated with a dash arrow; I, II, and III spiracular openings; ES, ecdysial scar.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Chaetotaxy map of <span class="html-italic">Pelecocera</span> species showing the number and relative positions of the body sensilla. Legend: Pt, prothorax; Ms, mesothorax; Mt, metathorax, A1–A8, abdominal segments; ARP, anterior respiratory process; PRP, posterior respiratory process; #, antenna-maxillary organs; •, sensilla with seta; a dash circle indicates a lappet position.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Puparium of <span class="html-italic">Pelecocera (Pelecocera) tricincta</span>: (<b>A</b>) Lateral view; (<b>B</b>) Dorsal view. Legend: H, height; L, length; W, width.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Pupal spiracles of <span class="html-italic">Pelecocera (Pelecocera) tricincta</span> and <span class="html-italic">Pelecocera (Chamaesyrphus) lugubris</span>: (<b>A</b>) <span class="html-italic">Pelecocera tricincta</span>, posterior side; (<b>B</b>) <span class="html-italic">Pelecocera tricincta</span>, anterior side; (<b>C</b>) <span class="html-italic">Pelecocera lugubris</span>, posterior side; (<b>D</b>) <span class="html-italic">Pelecocera lugubris</span>, anterior side; (<b>E</b>) Indication of distance measured for the descriptions. Legend: L, length; Sb, space between the pupal spiracle tips; W, width. Tubercles indicated with an arrow.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Third stage larva (L3) of <span class="html-italic">Pelecocera (Chamaesyrphus) lugubris</span>: (<b>A</b>) Dorsal view; (<b>B</b>) Lateral view. Dash arrows indicate locomotory prominences.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Puparium of <span class="html-italic">Pelecocera (Chamaesyrphus) lugubris</span>: (<b>A</b>) Lateral view; (<b>B</b>) Dorsal view.</p>
Full article ">
39 pages, 13240 KiB  
Article
The Extraordinary Diversity of Merodon avidus Complex (Diptera: Syrphidae)—Adding New Areas, New Species and a New Molecular Marker
by Ante Vujić, Nataša Kočiš Tubić, Snežana Radenković, Jelena Ačanski, Laura Likov, Maja Arok, Iva Gorše and Mihajla Djan
Insects 2024, 15(2), 105; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15020105 - 2 Feb 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1898
Abstract
In this paper, the Merodon avidus (Diptera, Syrphidae) species complex was revised, whereupon we discovered and described four new species for science: Merodon atroavidus Vujić, Radenković et Likov sp. nov., M. magnus Vujić, Kočiš Tubić et Ačanski sp. nov., M. nigroscutum Vujić, Radenković [...] Read more.
In this paper, the Merodon avidus (Diptera, Syrphidae) species complex was revised, whereupon we discovered and described four new species for science: Merodon atroavidus Vujić, Radenković et Likov sp. nov., M. magnus Vujić, Kočiš Tubić et Ačanski sp. nov., M. nigroscutum Vujić, Radenković et Likov sp. nov. and M. pseudomoenium Vujić, Kočiš Tubić et Ačanski sp. nov. An integrative taxonomy approach was used to delimit species boundaries. Two molecular markers (the mitochondrial COI gene and nuclear 28S rRNA gene—newly analysed marker for the complex) and geometric morphometry of the wing shape, together with morphological data and distribution, successfully separated all species from the complex. The morphological variability of the analysed species is described and discussed and an illustrated diagnostic key for typical morpho-forms of species from the M. avidus complex is presented. A distribution map of all investigated species from the complex is provided. The level of endemicity of the M. avidus complex was discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Systematics, Phylogeny and Evolution)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Habitus of male (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">Merodon avidus</span> and (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">M. moenium</span>, dorsal view. Scale bar 2 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p><span class="html-italic">Merodon moenium</span>, the location of 11 landmarks on a left wing selected for geometric morphometric analysis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Maximum Likelihood tree based on the concatenated COI gene fragments (5′-end and 3′-end) (bootstrap support values (≥50) are shown near nodes).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Maximum Likelihood tree based on combined COI gene fragments (5′-end and 3′-end) and 28S rRNA gene sequences (bootstrap support values (≥50) are shown near nodes).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Geometric morphometric analysis of the wing shape in males. (<b>A</b>) Position of male specimens in the space defined by CV1 and CV2 axes, (<b>B</b>) position of male specimens in the space defined by CV3 and CV4 axes, (<b>C</b>) position of male specimens in the space defined by CV5 and CV6 axes, (<b>D</b>) UPGMA phenogram constructed using squared Mahalanobis distances of wing shape.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Geometric morphometric analysis of the wing shape in females. (<b>A</b>) Position of female specimens in the space defined by CV1 and CV2 axes, (<b>B</b>) position of female specimens in the space defined by CV3 and CV4 axes, (<b>C</b>) position of female specimens in the space defined by CV4 and CV5 axes, (<b>D</b>) UPGMA phenogram constructed using squared Mahalanobis distances of wing shape.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>UPGMA phenogram constructed using squared Mahalanobis distances of wing shape for populations of species of the <span class="html-italic">Merodon avidus</span> complex.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Legs of male. (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">Merodon atroavidus</span>, (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">M. nigroscutum</span>, (<b>c</b>) <span class="html-italic">M. magnus</span>, (<b>d</b>) <span class="html-italic">M. pseudomoenium</span> and (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>) <span class="html-italic">M. atroavidus</span>. (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) metaleg, lateral view, (<b>e</b>) protibia and –tarsus, dorsal view and (<b>f</b>) mesotibia and –tarsus, dorsal view (scale bar (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) 1 mm, (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>) 0.5 mm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Metatarsus of male, dorsal view. (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">Merodon avidus</span>, (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">M. femoratus</span>, (<b>c</b>) <span class="html-italic">M. nigritarsis</span>, (<b>d</b>) <span class="html-italic">M. atroavidus</span> and (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>) <span class="html-italic">M. megavidus</span> (scale bar (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) 0.5 mm, (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>) 0.75 mm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Male genitalia <span class="html-italic">Merodon avidus</span>. (<b>a</b>) epandrium, lateral view, (<b>b</b>) epandrium, ventral view and (<b>c</b>) hypandrium, lateral view (scale bar 0.2 mm). pl—posterior surstylar lobe; al—anterior surstylar lobe; s—lateral sclerite of aedeagus; the ctenidium marked with arrow.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Male genitalia <span class="html-italic">Merodon nigritarsis</span>.(<b>a</b>) epandrium, lateral view, (<b>b</b>) epandrium, ventral view and (<b>c</b>) hypandrium, lateral view (scale bar 0.5 mm). pl—posterior surstylar lobe; al—anterior surstylar lobe; s—lateral sclerite of aedeagus; the subapical thorn marked with arrow.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Basoflagellomere of male, lateral view. (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">M. atroavidus</span>, (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">M. magnus</span> and (<b>c</b>) <span class="html-italic">M. nigroscutum</span> (scale bar 0.5 mm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p><span class="html-italic">Merodon magnus</span>, head of male. (<b>a</b>) frontal view, (<b>b</b>) lateral view (scale bar 0.5 mm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Abdomen of male, dorsal view. (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">M. atroavidus</span>, (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">M. magnus</span>, (<b>c</b>) <span class="html-italic">M. nigroscutum</span> and (<b>d</b>) <span class="html-italic">M. pseudomoenium</span> (scale bar 1 mm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Abdomen of female, dorsal view. (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">M. atroavidus</span>, (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">M. nigroscutum</span> (scale bar 1 mm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Thorax of female, lateral view. (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">M. atroavidus</span>, (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">M. nigroscutum</span> (scale bar 1 mm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Male genitalia, surstylar lobe, lateral view. (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">M. atroavidus</span>, (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">M. magnus</span>, (<b>c</b>) <span class="html-italic">M. nigroscutum</span> and (<b>d</b>) <span class="html-italic">M. pseudomoenium</span> (scale bar 0.1 mm). pl—posterior surstylar lobe; al—anterior surstylar lobe.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Distribution map of <span class="html-italic">M. avidus, M. ibericus, M. atroavidus</span> sp. nov and <span class="html-italic">M. nigroscutum</span> sp. nov.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Distribution map of <span class="html-italic">M. megavidus, M. moenium, M. magnus</span> sp. nov and <span class="html-italic">M. pseudomoenium</span> sp. nov.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Metaleg, lateral view. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">Merodon avidus</span>, (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) <span class="html-italic">M. megavidus</span> ((<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) male; (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) female; scale bar 1 mm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Summary of the results of integrative species delimitation. Each species is represented by a different colour. Solid colour boxes indicate successful species delimitation by a particular approach. Multicolour boxes depict clusters formed by multiple species.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 2162 KiB  
Article
Effect of Climatic Variations in the Floral Phenology of Berberis microphylla and Its Pollinator Insects
by Silvia Radice, Edgardo Giordani and Miriam E. Arena
Horticulturae 2023, 9(12), 1254; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9121254 - 23 Nov 2023
Viewed by 1384
Abstract
Berberis microphylla (calafate) is an evergreen shrub that grows spontaneously in the Argentinean and Chilean Patagonia with a very harsh climate. This Sub-Antarctic zone is affected by the “El Niño” and “La Niña” pattern, which is measured using the Oceanic Niño Index (ONI). [...] Read more.
Berberis microphylla (calafate) is an evergreen shrub that grows spontaneously in the Argentinean and Chilean Patagonia with a very harsh climate. This Sub-Antarctic zone is affected by the “El Niño” and “La Niña” pattern, which is measured using the Oceanic Niño Index (ONI). The objective of this study was to analyze the floral phenology and its pollinator insects, in relation to the climatic conditions observed. This work was developed in Ushuaia (Argentina) during 2010, 2014, 2015, and 2016. Significant differences were observed for the development of flower bud and floral phenology between the four years studied. On 26 October, between 84 and 100% of flower buds was recorded in the shrubs tested during the years 2010, 2014, and 2015 and then decreased abruptly in 2010 and more slowly in 2014 and 2015. However, in 2016 on the same date, it was recorded 70% of button flowers increasing to 90% on 5 November and then slowly evolving towards the anthesis phase. On the other hand, the anthesis phase was developed rapidly for 2010 and 2015 and slower for 2014 and 2016. A peak in anthesis occurred on 2 November in 2010, while in the other years, it was observed later in 16 November. The hoverflies of the genus Carposcalis and Allograpta, both insects verified to be responsible for the pollination of calafate, were registered between 2014 and 2016. Carposcalis was significantly more present in 2014, while in 2015 and 2016, Allograpta was predominant. The insect activity was also related with the climatic conditions, i.e., air temperature, air relative humidity, wind speed, and gust of wind along the day during the anthesis phase, and which also modified its life cycle. So, it was observed in 2016, the year with winter temperatures higher than normal, that adult hoverflies ended their hibernation period earlier and began to lay eggs on the juvenile calafate sprouts; hence, the emerging larvae ate the pollen grain of button flowers, causing a decrease in future fruits harvested. The results presented show that the “La Niña” and “El Niño” effects in these latitudes are the opposite of those expected. Spring 2016 developed under a strong “La Niña” effect, as occurred in 2010 with temperatures warmer than in 2014 and 2015, where both years developed under the “El Niño” effect. This study showed how climatic conditions can modify the floral phenology of B. microphylla and its pollinator insect frequency, their activity, and their life cycle. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p><span class="html-italic">Berberis microphylla</span> (calafate) grown in Tierra del Fuego. (<b>A</b>) Shrub with flowers; (<b>B</b>) flower in anthesis phase with <span class="html-italic">Carposcalis</span> sp. sucking nectar; and (<b>C</b>) details of fruits.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Phenology of <span class="html-italic">Berberis microphylla</span> (calafate) growing in the Ushuaia bay during 2010, 2014, 2015, and 2016 spring periods. (<b>A</b>) Evolution of button flowers; (<b>B</b>) evolution of flowers in anthesis phase. Values are expressed in percentage. Different letters among years show significant differences according to χ<sup>2</sup> and post hoc test (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Frequency of pollinator hoverflies (% of hoverfly visit with respect to the total number of insect visits) measured in spring of 2014 according to (<b>A</b>) temperature; (<b>B</b>) wind speed and gust of wind. (<b>C</b>) Values are expressed in percentage ± error bar according to χ<sup>2</sup> and post hoc test (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Presence of insects on <span class="html-italic">Berberis microphylla</span>. (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) Eggs of hoverflies over leaf of calafate; (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>) hoverflies larvae feeding on an aphid; and (<b>E</b>) hoverflies larvae (arrow).</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 1330 KiB  
Article
Local-Scale DNA Barcoding of Afrotropical Hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae): A Case Study of the Eastern Free State of South Africa
by Michel Mathurin Kamdem, Mpho Ramoejane and Patricks Voua Otomo
Insects 2023, 14(8), 692; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14080692 - 4 Aug 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1486
Abstract
The Afrotropical hoverflies remain an understudied group of hoverflies. One of the reasons for the lack of studies on this group resides in the difficulties to delimit the species using the available identification keys. DNA barcoding has been found useful in such cases [...] Read more.
The Afrotropical hoverflies remain an understudied group of hoverflies. One of the reasons for the lack of studies on this group resides in the difficulties to delimit the species using the available identification keys. DNA barcoding has been found useful in such cases of taxonomical uncertainty. Here, we present a molecular study of hoverfly species from the eastern Free State of South Africa using the mitochondrial cytochrome-c oxidase subunit I gene (COI). The identification of 78 specimens was achieved through three analytical approaches: genetic distances analysis, species delimitation models and phylogenetic reconstructions. In this study, 15 nominal species from nine genera were recorded. Of these species, five had not been previously reported to occur in South Africa, namely, Betasyrphus inflaticornis Bezzi, 1915, Mesembrius strigilatus Bezzi, 1912, Eristalinus tabanoides Jaennicke, 1876, Eristalinus vicarians Bezzi, 1915 and Eristalinus fuscicornis Karsch, 1887. Intra- and interspecific variations were found and were congruent between neighbour-joining and maximum likelihood analyses, except for the genus Allograpta Osten Sacken, 1875, where identification seemed problematic, with a relatively high (1.56%) intraspecific LogDet distance observed in Allograpta nasuta Macquart, 1842. Within the 78 specimens analysed, the assembled species by automatic partitioning (ASAP) estimated the presence of 14–17 species, while the Poisson tree processes based on the MPTP and SPTP models estimated 15 and 16 species. The three models showed similar results (10 species) for the Eristalinae subfamily, while for the Syrphinae subfamily, 5 and 6 species were suggested through MPTP and SPTP, respectively. Our results highlight the necessity of using different species delimitation models in DNA barcoding for species diagnoses. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Systematics, Phylogeny and Evolution)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study area in the Maluti-A-Phufong and Phumelela municipalities (Free State province of South Africa). Red circles represent sampling locations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Neighbour-joining tree depicting the degree of relationship between the Afrotropical hoverfly species produced from the COI gene. Bootstrap support values higher than 70 are reported on the tree. Information on specimens is given in the <a href="#insects-14-00692-t0A1" class="html-table">Table A1</a> in <a href="#app1-insects-14-00692" class="html-app">Appendix A</a>. <span class="html-italic">Alipumilio avispas</span> (AY261709) was included as the outgroup.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Maximum likelihood tree based on the general time-reversible model. Bootstrap support values higher than 70 are reported on the tree. The twelve green bars represent specimens included in species delimitation models (ASAP, MPTP and SPTP). The thirteen black bars indicate published sequences (and accession numbers) downloaded from either Genbank or Bold. <span class="html-italic">Alipumilio avispas</span> (AY261709) was included as the outgroup.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 973 KiB  
Article
Annual Crops Contribute More Predators than Perennial Habitats during an Aphid Outbreak
by Crystal D. Almdal and Alejandro C. Costamagna
Insects 2023, 14(7), 624; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14070624 - 11 Jul 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1438
Abstract
Crops and semi-natural habitats provide predator populations with varying floral and prey resources, but their individual role on predator movement has seldom been studied. Here, we tease apart the role of adjacent habitats, predator abundance in the adjacent habitat, and soybean aphid ( [...] Read more.
Crops and semi-natural habitats provide predator populations with varying floral and prey resources, but their individual role on predator movement has seldom been studied. Here, we tease apart the role of adjacent habitats, predator abundance in the adjacent habitat, and soybean aphid (Aphis glycines Matsumura) abundance in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) on predator movement into soybean. We studied 12 soybean fields adjacent to alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), canola (Brassica napus L.), spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), or woody vegetation, during a soybean aphid outbreak. Bidirectional Malaise traps and sticky traps were used to quantify predator movement between and abundance within soybean and adjacent habitats, respectively. Field plant counts were conducted to quantify aphid abundance in soybean. Coccinellidae and Syrphidae were the two most abundant families collected. Coccinellids and Eupeodes americanus (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Syrphidae) had net movement in soybean and their movement increased with aphid abundance. Movement of E. americanus was highest from wheat, coccinellid abundance was higher in wheat than woody vegetation, Toxomerus marginatus (Say) (Diptera: Syrphidae) abundance was highest in canola, and all other predators were more abundant in canola than woody vegetation. In general, our study suggests that annual crops have and provide more predators to soybean during aphid outbreaks than perennial habitats. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Pest and Vector Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Effects of adjacent habitat type (canola, spring wheat, alfalfa, and woody vegetation) on predator bidirectional movement (log10 [individuals/trap] +1) in soybean, across two weeks collected from bidirectional Malaise traps, for (<b>a</b>) syrphids, (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">Eupeodes americanus</span>, and (<b>c</b>) coccinellids. Confidence intervals (95%) were plotted. Different letters denote significant differences between adjacent habitat types (Tukey test; <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05), see <a href="#insects-14-00624-t002" class="html-table">Table 2</a> for model statistics.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Factors affecting movement of predators into soybean (log10 [individuals/trap] +1) across two weeks collected from bidirectional Malaise traps. Effects of (<b>a</b>) number of syrphids in adjacent habitats and (<b>b</b>) adjacent habitat types on syrphid movement into soybean, of (<b>c</b>) number of aphids in soybean and (<b>d</b>) adjacent habitat types on <span class="html-italic">Eupeodes americanus</span> movement into soybean, of (<b>e</b>) number of <span class="html-italic">Toxomerus marginatus</span> in adjacent habitats on <span class="html-italic">T. marginatus</span> movement into soybean, and of (<b>f</b>) number of aphids in soybean on coccinellid movement into soybean. Adjacent habitat abundance was estimated using sticky traps (log10 [#/5 sticky traps] +1) and aphid abundance was estimated by plant counts (log10 [mean # aphids/plant]). Continuous variables in linear models are presented as black lines, partial residuals as gray dots and confidence intervals (95%) as grey area; categorical variables are presented as means ± standard errors. Different letters denote significant differences between adjacent habitat types (Tukey test; <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05), see <a href="#insects-14-00624-t003" class="html-table">Table 3</a> for full model statistics.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop