[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (62)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Digital Shoreline Analysis System

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
17 pages, 17273 KiB  
Article
Monitoring Coastal Evolution and Geomorphological Processes Using Time-Series Remote Sensing and Geospatial Analysis: Application Between Cape Serrat and Kef Abbed, Northern Tunisia
by Zeineb Kassouk, Emna Ayari, Benoit Deffontaines and Mohamed Ouaja
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(20), 3895; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16203895 - 19 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1264
Abstract
The monitoring of coastal evolution (coastline and associated geomorphological features) caused by episodic and persistent processes associated with climatic and anthropic activities is required for coastal management decisions. The availability of open access, remotely sensed data with increasing spatial, temporal, and spectral resolutions, [...] Read more.
The monitoring of coastal evolution (coastline and associated geomorphological features) caused by episodic and persistent processes associated with climatic and anthropic activities is required for coastal management decisions. The availability of open access, remotely sensed data with increasing spatial, temporal, and spectral resolutions, is promising in this context. The coastline of Northern Tunisia is currently showing geomorphic process, such as increasing erosion associated with lateral sedimentation. This study aims to investigate the potential of time-series optical data, namely Landsat (from 1985–2019) and Google Earth® satellite imagery (from 2007 to 2023), to analyze shoreline changes and morphosedimentary and geomorphological processes between Cape Serrat and Kef Abbed, Northern Tunisia. The Digital Shoreline Analysis System (DSAS) was used to quantify the multitemporal rates of shoreline using two metrics: the net shoreline movement (NSM) and the end-point rate (EPR). Erosion was observed around the tombolo and near river mouths, exacerbated by the presence of surrounding dams, where the NSM is up to −8.31 m/year. Despite a total NSM of −15 m, seasonal dynamics revealed a maximum erosion in winter (71% negative NSM) and accretion in spring (57% positive NSM). The effects of currents, winds, and dams on dune dynamics were studied using historical images of Google Earth®. In the period from 1994 to 2023, the area is marked by dune face retreat and removal in more than 40% of the site, showing the increasing erosion. At finer spatial resolution and according to the synergy of field observations and photointerpretation, four key geomorphic processes shaping the coastline were identified: wave/tide action, wind transport, pedogenesis, and deposition. Given the frequent changes in coastal areas, this method facilitates the maintenance and updating of coastline databases, which are essential for analyzing the impacts of the sea level rise in the southern Mediterranean region. Furthermore, the developed approach could be implemented with a range of forecast scenarios to simulate the impacts of a higher future sea-level enhanced climate change. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Remote Sensing in Coastal Geomorphology (Third Edition))
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the studied northern Tunisian coastal area (southern Mediterranean seashore) between Cape Serrat and Ragoubet El Golea, showing (blue rectangle) the three main dams and rivers, including Ziatine, Gamgoum, and El Harka. The study area was divided into six zones, according to their morphologies: Three zones are characterized by rocky coasts, a sandy coastal area with a tombolo, and fixed and (semi-)fixed dune zones. The background is the MapTiler Satellite map.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flowchart related to Landsat data analysis for the years 1985–2019. It involves the following: (<b>a</b>) the pre-processes steps: radiometric calibration, geometric, and atmospheric corrections; (<b>b</b>) the multi-time coastline extraction based on the Tasseled map transformation (greenness/wetness data extraction); and (<b>c</b>) coastline evolution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Net shoreline movement (NSM) in the period from 1985 to 2019 between Cape Serrat and Ragoubet el Golea points. Shoreline retreat is indicated by red lines, while green lines represent relatively unchanged areas. Shoreline advance is indicated by blue lines. The background is the MapTiler Topo map.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Erosion forms are mainly identified around the tombolo areas, indicated by red lines.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Seasonal sedimentary balance of shoreline movement based on near-shore movement values (the distance between the oldest and youngest shorelines), net shoreline movement and (<b>b</b>) seasonal NSM variation showing the balance between erosion (blue color) and accretion (red color) and the total NSM value.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Spatial distribution of dunes as examples of different stages, from stable and vegetated dunes to system instability and the development of a mobile transgressive dune system. High sand dune (Level 1 or L1); incipient dune, L2, and foredune (LN) (background map is a GoogleEarth<sup>®</sup> image of 2019).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The disappearance of the incipient dune between 1994 and 2018, based on two satellite GoogleEarth<sup>®</sup> views. The phenomena highlight the important erosion process around the tombolo.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Example of wind action on the dunes based on GoogleEarth<sup>®</sup> time-series imagery (a view of zone 2 (<a href="#remotesensing-16-03895-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>)). Green arrows highlight the perpendicular direction of the wind reactivation by a secondary wind from the north–east (NE) of the old dunes under the dominant north–west (NW) wind.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>An example of dune zonation in the study area in relation to wind direction. Five categories of dunes were identified, including near-shore zones, high sand dunes, incipient dunes, foredunes, and transgressive dunes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Examples of two dune systems in the study area: (<b>a</b>) the long dunes form caused by the interaction of multiple coastal currents or wind directions; (<b>b</b>) the short dunes form under the influence of a single, dominant current and wind direction. The white line in the sea (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) represents the coastal current direction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The retreat and removal of dunes (<b>a</b>). A series of parallel dune ridges, with the oldest dune ridges located furthest inland. (<b>b</b>) Formation and growth of flat dune deposits in zone 5 (<a href="#remotesensing-16-03895-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>), characterized by semi-fixed dunes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The coastal landscape in Cape Serrat (<a href="#remotesensing-16-03895-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>, zone 1) (<b>a</b>), showing the reshaping of the rocky shoreline from 1994 to 2019. Sedimentary rock layers with visible ripple marks, highlighting geomorphological features caused by weathering and erosion in the cliff, and the abrasion phenomena in the cliff (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>The dynamics of coastal erosion and dune dynamics processes, particularly in relation to waves action, dune formations, and stability. (<b>a</b>) shows the coastal features (dunes, inshore sand deposits); (<b>b</b>) the relationship between water level and micro-cliff formation caused by erosion; and (<b>c</b>) illustrates the effects of storm wave attacks on dunes.</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 1631 KiB  
Article
A Balloon Mapping Approach to Forecast Increases in PM10 from the Shrinking Shoreline of the Salton Sea
by Ryan G. Sinclair, Josileide Gaio, Sahara D. Huazano, Seth A. Wiafe and William C. Porter
Geographies 2024, 4(4), 630-640; https://doi.org/10.3390/geographies4040034 - 17 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1813
Abstract
Shrinking shorelines and the exposed playa of saline lakes can pose public health and air quality risks for local communities. This study combines a community science method with models to forecast future shorelines and PM10 air quality impacts from the exposed playa of [...] Read more.
Shrinking shorelines and the exposed playa of saline lakes can pose public health and air quality risks for local communities. This study combines a community science method with models to forecast future shorelines and PM10 air quality impacts from the exposed playa of the Salton Sea, near the community of North Shore, CA, USA. The community science process assesses the rate of shoreline change from aerial images collected through a balloon mapping method. These images, captured from 2019 to 2021, are combined with additional satellite images of the shoreline dating back to 2002, and analyzed with the DSAS (Digital Shoreline Analysis System) in ArcGIS desktop. The observed rate of change was greatly increased during the period from 2017 to 2020. The average rate of change rose from 12.53 m/year between 2002 and 2017 to an average of 38.44 m/year of shoreline change from 2017 to 2020. The shoreline is projected to retreat 150 m from its current position by 2030 and an additional 172 m by 2041. To assess potential air quality impacts, we use WRF-Chem, a regional chemical transport model, to predict increases in emissive dust from the newly exposed playa land surface. The model output indicates that the forecasted 20-year increase in exposed playa will also lead to a rise in the amount of suspended dust, which can then be transported into the surrounding communities. The combination of these model projections suggests that, without mitigation, the expanding exposed playa around the Salton Sea is expected to worsen pollutant exposure in local communities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers of Geographies in 2024)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Map of the North Shore area of the Salton Sea, CA, with coastline segments (transects) used during this study in two different regions (North and South Yacht Club).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>A balloon mapping rig flying above the North Shore of the Salton Sea shown with a picavet holding a GoPro7 and suspended by three mylar sleeping bag balloons.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>An output from DSAS analysis in ArcGIS showing an area in North Shore Salton Sea with historical shoreline positions, which enabled the calculation shoreline change statistics. The final data used for the DSAS were in 2021, with the 2020 line shown here for reference in the image. The DSAS was used to show future shoreline positions with uncertainty bands for the 2031 and 2041 forecasts.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Boxplots of the projected increase in PM10 concentrations in 2041 from a WRF-Chem model that uses the increase in land area of a 2-square-kilometer area as calculated from the DSAS model.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 10838 KiB  
Article
Are Beaches Losing Their Capacity to Receive Holidaymakers? The Case of Ofir, Portugal
by Sara Silva, Jorge Novais, António Vieira and Tiago Marques
Sustainability 2024, 16(20), 8891; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16208891 - 14 Oct 2024
Viewed by 959
Abstract
Coastlines are suffering from the effects of erosive processes, the decrease in sediment supply, the rise in mean sea level, and the construction of coastal infrastructure and drainage works, which are further exacerbated by global climate change. The area of the Parque Natural [...] Read more.
Coastlines are suffering from the effects of erosive processes, the decrease in sediment supply, the rise in mean sea level, and the construction of coastal infrastructure and drainage works, which are further exacerbated by global climate change. The area of the Parque Natural do Litoral Norte (North Coast Natural Park) reveals worsening erosion rates and the transformations directly affect the natural resources that support tourism activities, particularly beach and nature tourism. As part of the CLICTOUR project, we have selected the coastline from Restinga de Ofir to Bonança Beach as a case study. The ESRI ArcGIS software and the Digital Shoreline Analysis System (DSAS) were used to quantify coastline migration and identify the impacts on beach morphology between 2010 and 2023. Based on this information, we calculated changes in carrying capacity and scenarios for visitor usage availability to ensure the protection of fauna and flora, as well as the safety of beachgoers. The results of the linear regression rate confirm the coastline has retreated during the period analyzed (2010–2023). The outcome of these dynamics is noticeable in the beach area, promoting its reduction in area and leisure quality. Considering climate change, this study shows the importance of developing resilience strategies for coastal territories that serve as traditional summer destinations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Trends in Sustainable Tourism—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Context of Restinga de Ofir, Ofir Beach, and Bonança Beach.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Coastline evolution between 2010 and 2023 and photographic records. Source: shoreline evolution derived from flights conducted in April 2023. Photographic records of Ofir and Bonança beaches, captured on 8 April 2023. Photographic records of Restinga de Ofir captured on 12 November 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Photographic records of Bonança Beach. Source: photos captured on 16 June 2022, at Bonança Beach.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 6799 KiB  
Article
Detection of Cliff Top Erosion Drivers through Machine Learning Algorithms between Portonovo and Trave Cliffs (Ancona, Italy)
by Nicola Fullin, Michele Fraccaroli, Mirko Francioni, Stefano Fabbri, Angelo Ballaera, Paolo Ciavola and Monica Ghirotti
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(14), 2604; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16142604 - 16 Jul 2024
Viewed by 1239
Abstract
Rocky coastlines are characterised by steep cliffs, which frequently experience a variety of natural processes that often exhibit intricate interdependencies, such as rainfall, ice and water run-off, and marine actions. The advent of high temporal and spatial resolution data, that can be acquired [...] Read more.
Rocky coastlines are characterised by steep cliffs, which frequently experience a variety of natural processes that often exhibit intricate interdependencies, such as rainfall, ice and water run-off, and marine actions. The advent of high temporal and spatial resolution data, that can be acquired through remote sensing and geomatics techniques, has facilitated the safe exploration of otherwise inaccessible areas. The datasets that can be gathered from these techniques, typically combined with data from fieldwork, can subsequently undergo analyses employing/applying machine learning algorithms and/or numerical modeling, in order to identify/discern the predominant influencing factors affecting cliff top erosion. This study focuses on a specific case situated at the Conero promontory of the Adriatic Sea in the Marche region. The research methodology entails several steps. Initially, the morphological, geological and geomechanical characteristics of the areas were determined through unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and conventional geological/geomechanical surveys. Subsequently, cliff top retreat was determined within a GIS environment by comparing orthophotos taken in 1978 and 2022 using the DSAS tool (Digital Shoreline Analysis System), highlighting cliff top retreat up to 50 m in some sectors. Further analysis was conducted via the use of two Machine Learning (ML) algorithms, namely Random Forest (RF) and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB). The Mean Decrease in Impurity (MDI) methodology was employed to assess the significance of each factor. Both algorithms yielded congruent results, emphasising that cliff top erosion rates are primarily influenced by slope height. Finally, a validation of the ML algorithm results was conducted using 2D Limit Equilibrium Method (LEM) codes. Ten sections extracted from the sector experiencing the most substantial cliff top retreat, as identified by DSAS, were utilised for 2D LEM analysis. Factor of Safety (FS) values were identified and compared with the cliff height of each section. The results from the 2D LEM analyses corroborated the outputs of the ML algorithms, showing a strong correlation between the slope instability and slope height (R2 of 0.84), with FS decreasing with slope height. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Map displaying the position of the study area: (<b>a</b>) Satellite image showing the study area and the three sectors called Portonovo, Mezzavalle and Trave. (image taken from GeoEye satellite database, 2020). (<b>b</b>) Location of the study area along the Italian Adriatic coast.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Workflow sketch: (1) fieldwork; (2) data analyses and surveys. (3) Parameters’ extraction. (4) Machine learning analysis. (5) Slope stability analysis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Representation of Random Forest.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Representation of eXtreme Gradient Boosting.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Extracted sections are highlighted in violet and numbered. Sections used for the LEM analysis are represented in violet from 1–10.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Geological/geomorphological setting of the study area and “Sectors”: (1) Portonovo; (2) Mezzavalle; (3) Trave. Bedrock legend: SCH (Schlier Fm., Lower Miocene-Upper Miocene), GNOa (Sapigno Fm. Upper Miocene), FCO (Colombacci Fm., Upper Miocene), Tv (Trave horizon, Lower Pliocene), FAA (Argille Azzurre Fm., Lower Pliocene-Lower Pleistocene).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Pictures portraying the different configurations of the cliff base. (<b>a</b>) Portonovo sector; (<b>b</b>) Mezzavalle sector; (<b>c</b>) Trave sector.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Horizontal georeferencing uncertainty, measured between the 1978 and 2022 orthophotos.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>NSM values calculated along transects, referring to the period 1978–2022: Portonovo and Trave sector showed the highest values of retreat. Computed transects (<b>a</b>) at Portonovo sector; (<b>b</b>) at Mezzavalle sector; (<b>c</b>) at Trave sector.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>ML results and analysis performed using RF and XGB algorithms. (1) Sketch displaying the parameters used in the analysis. (2) Illustration of the ML algorithm used. (3) Sketch illustrating ML results. (3a) Graph showing feature importance resulting from RF algorithm. (3b) Confusion matrix of RF elaboration. (3c) Graph illustrating the feature importance extracted using XGB algorithm. (3d) Confusion matrix of XGB analysis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Graph comparing FS and cliff height values in the ten extracted sections. The number below the dot refers to the section number in <a href="#remotesensing-16-02604-t005" class="html-table">Table 5</a>.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 5684 KiB  
Article
Description and Whole-Genome Sequencing of Mariniflexile litorale sp. nov., Isolated from the Shallow Sediments of the Sea of Japan
by Lyudmila Romanenko, Evgeniya Bystritskaya, Yuliya Savicheva, Viacheslav Eremeev, Nadezhda Otstavnykh, Valeriya Kurilenko, Peter Velansky and Marina Isaeva
Microorganisms 2024, 12(7), 1413; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12071413 - 12 Jul 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1164
Abstract
A Gram-negative, aerobic, rod-shaped, non-motile, yellow-pigmented bacterium, KMM 9835T, was isolated from the sediment sample obtained from the Amur Bay of the Sea of Japan seashore, Russia. Phylogenetic analyses based on the 16S rRNA gene and whole genome sequences positioned the [...] Read more.
A Gram-negative, aerobic, rod-shaped, non-motile, yellow-pigmented bacterium, KMM 9835T, was isolated from the sediment sample obtained from the Amur Bay of the Sea of Japan seashore, Russia. Phylogenetic analyses based on the 16S rRNA gene and whole genome sequences positioned the novel strain KMM 9835T in the genus Mariniflexile as a separate line sharing the highest 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities of 96.6% and 96.2% with Mariniflexile soesokkakense RSSK-9T and Mariniflexile fucanivorans SW5T, respectively, and similarity values of <96% to other recognized Mariniflexile species. The average nucleotide identity and digital DNA–DNA hybridization values between strain KMM 9835T and M. soesokkakense KCTC 32427T, Mariniflexile gromovii KCTC 12570T, M. fucanivorans DSM 18792T, and M. maritimum M5A1MT were 83.0%, 82.5%, 83.4%, and 78.3% and 30.7%, 29.6%, 29.5%, and 24.4%, respectively. The genomic DNA GC content of strain KMM 9835T was 32.5 mol%. The dominant menaquinone was MK-6, and the major fatty acids were iso-C15:0, iso-C15:1ω10c, and C15:0. The polar lipids of strain KMM 9835T consisted of phosphatidylethanolamine, two unidentified aminolipids, an unidentified phospholipid, and six unidentified lipids. A pan-genome analysis showed that the KMM 9835T genome encoded 753 singletons. The annotated singletons were more often related to transport protein systems (SusC), transcriptional regulators (AraC, LytTR, LacI), and enzymes (glycosylases). The KMM 9835T genome was highly enriched in CAZyme-encoding genes, the proportion of which reached 7.3%. Moreover, the KMM 9835T genome was characterized by a high abundance of CAZyme gene families (GH43, GH28, PL1, PL10, CE8, and CE12), indicating its potential to catabolize pectin. This may represent part of an adaptation strategy facilitating microbial consumption of plant polymeric substrates in aquatic environments near shorelines and freshwater sources. Based on the combination of phylogenetic and phenotypic characterization, the marine sediment strain KMM 9835T (=KCTC 92792T) represents a novel species of the genus Mariniflexile, for which the name Mariniflexile litorale sp. nov. is proposed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Marine Microorganisms and Ecology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>NJ/ML/MP tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences available from the GenBank database showing relationships between the novel strain KMM 9835<sup>T</sup> (in bold), <span class="html-italic">Mariniflexile</span> species, and related taxa of the family <span class="html-italic">Flavobacteriaceae</span>. The NJ tree was reconstructed using the Kimura two-parameter model. The ML tree was inferred under the GTR + GAMMA model. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. The numbers above the branches represent bootstrap values with 1000 replicates larger than 60% (NJ/ML/MP). The bar indicates 0.02 accumulated substitutions per nucleotide position.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>ML tree based on concatenated sequences of 341 translated proteins showing the phylogenetic position of strain KMM 9835<sup>T</sup> among <span class="html-italic">Mariniflexile</span> species and related taxa. The tree was inferred under the PROTCATLG evolutionary model using 100 replicates for bootstrapping. Bar: 0.20 substitutions per amino acid position.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Chromosome map of strain KMM 9835<sup>T</sup> created using the Proksee server [<a href="#B42-microorganisms-12-01413" class="html-bibr">42</a>]. The scale is shown in megabases (Mbp) on the inside circle. Starting with the inner rings, the first two circles represent GC content (in black) and GC skew (G−C)/(G+C) (in violet blue and light green). The next two dark red circles show reverse and forward strand CDSs. Moving outward, the dark green circle shows PULs designated as CGCs, annotated by the dbCAN server [<a href="#B49-microorganisms-12-01413" class="html-bibr">49</a>]. The outermost circle shows the CRISPR-Cas region (in black). The figure also shows retron-type RNA-directed DNA polymerase (EC 2.7.7.49) (designated as retron 1–13 with black labels), <span class="html-italic">rrn</span> operons (blue labels), <span class="html-italic">oriC</span> (<span class="html-italic">leuB</span>_2 and <span class="html-italic">dnaA</span>), and <span class="html-italic">ter</span> (<span class="html-italic">mnmG</span>) (red labels).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The pan-genome of seven strains of <span class="html-italic">Mariniflexile</span> spp. generated with anvi’o [<a href="#B50-microorganisms-12-01413" class="html-bibr">50</a>]. Circle bars represent the presence/absence of 9163 pan-genomic clusters in each genome. Gene clusters are organized as core (green), shell (yellow), cloud (red), and singleton (purple) gene clusters using Euclidian distance and Ward ordination. The heatmap in the upper right corner shows pairwise values of average nucleotide identity (ANI) in percentages. The bars under the heatmap show, relative to each genome, the number of gene clusters (0–3881), number of singleton gene clusters (0–1010), GC-content (0–0.37778), and total length (0–4,858,325). The strain KMM 9835<sup>T</sup> is colored red. Other information included in the figure comprises the maximum number of paralogs, combined homogeneity index, single-copy gene clusters (SCG clusters), and KOfam and KEGG modules (green and light green circles).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Distribution of CAZymes within the <span class="html-italic">Mariniflexile</span> genus. (<b>a</b>) Number of CAZyme classes in KMM 9835<sup>T</sup> and other <span class="html-italic">Mariniflexile</span> species. (<b>b</b>) Heatmap of CAZyme family abundance in <span class="html-italic">Mariniflexile</span> species. GH—glycoside hydrolase, GT—glycosyltransferase, CE—carbohydrate esterase, PL—polysaccharide lyase, AA—auxiliary activity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>A transmission electron micrograph of strain KMM 9835<sup>T</sup>, grown on MA 2216. Bar, 1 µm.</p>
Full article ">
26 pages, 16216 KiB  
Article
Management of Coastline Variability in an Endangered Island Environment: The Case of Noirmoutier Island (France)
by Imane Meziane, Marc Robin, Paul Fattal and Oualid Rahmani
Coasts 2024, 4(3), 482-507; https://doi.org/10.3390/coasts4030025 - 5 Jul 2024
Viewed by 1671
Abstract
This article presents a diachronic study of evolution along the coastline of Noirmoutier Island in France, a sandy shore particularly susceptible to erosion and submersion risks, which are exacerbated by climate change due to two-thirds of its territory being below sea level. The [...] Read more.
This article presents a diachronic study of evolution along the coastline of Noirmoutier Island in France, a sandy shore particularly susceptible to erosion and submersion risks, which are exacerbated by climate change due to two-thirds of its territory being below sea level. The study is based on an analysis of aerial images covering a period of 72 years, divided into five distinct periods: 1950–1974, 1974–1992, 1992–2000, 2000–2010, and 2010–2022. The methodology used combines two complementary approaches: the Digital Shoreline Analysis System (DSAS) for taking linear measurements of the erosion and accretion that have taken place along various shorelines, and the surface method to evaluate the amount of surface lost or gained between different shorelines while calculating the uncertainties associated with the obtained results. The overall trend observed between 1950 and 2022 indicates that the Noirmoutier coastline studied has gained surface area (81 hectares) at an average rate of +0.57 ± 0.06 m per year. The article then presents an application of the method developed by Durand and Heurtefeux in 2006 to estimate the future position of the shoreline. A map of the local area is also provided, identifying the areas susceptible to coastal erosion by 2052 and by 2122, in accordance with the provisions of the Climate and Resilience Law adopted in France on 22 August 2021. The results reveal that there are many sources of uncertainty in predicting the future evolution of the shoreline using this methodology. Therefore, it is crucial to consider these uncertainties when planning future coastal management actions and adopting appropriate adaptation methods to counteract unforeseen developments. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geographic location of Noirmoutier Island (France).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Identification of littoral cells on the Noirmoutier coastline: the DHI strategy [<a href="#B16-coasts-04-00025" class="html-bibr">16</a>] (red dashed line), comparison of the Parcineau strategy [<a href="#B17-coasts-04-00025" class="html-bibr">17</a>] (green line) and this study (black line).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Magnified image showing a sample representation of the evolution rates between 1950 and 1975 in boxes of 20 × 250 m along LC2-E. Background: BD ORTHO<sup>®</sup> 2016.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Schematic process of mapping the projected shoreline over 30 years (2052) from the reference shoreline of 2022. (<b>a</b>) generation of transects; (<b>b</b>) projection of points on the land; (<b>c</b>) creation of transects oriented towards the sea; (<b>d</b>) projection of points towards the sea; (<b>e</b>) overlay of points; (<b>f</b>) digitisation of the shoreline position in 2052. Red dots (negative retreat rate = R<sup>−</sup>) represent the projection towards land, and green dots (positive retreat rate = R<sup>+</sup>) towards the sea.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Summary map of the Noirmoutier shoreline evolution. (<b>a</b>) Overall shoreline evolution between 1950 and 2022: EPR = +0.57 m/year, NSM = +40.63 m, overall error = ±0.06 m/year; (<b>b</b>) Overall shoreline evolution between 1950 and 1974: EPR = −0.12 m/year, NSM = −2.96 m, overall error = ±0.20 m/year; (<b>c</b>) Overall shoreline evolution between 1974 and 1992: EPR = +1.10 m/year, NSM = +19.47 m, overall error = ±0.28 m/year; (<b>d</b>) Overall shoreline evolution between 1992 and 2000: EPR = −0.20 m/year, NSM = −1.65 m, overall error = ±0.60 m/year; (<b>e</b>) Overall shoreline evolution between 2000 and 2010: EPR = +0.54 m/year, NSM = +5.58 m, overall error = ±0.44 m/year; (<b>f</b>) Overall shoreline evolution between 2010 and 2022: EPR = +1.45 m/year, NSM = +16.26 m, overall error = ±0.34 m/year.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5 Cont.
<p>Summary map of the Noirmoutier shoreline evolution. (<b>a</b>) Overall shoreline evolution between 1950 and 2022: EPR = +0.57 m/year, NSM = +40.63 m, overall error = ±0.06 m/year; (<b>b</b>) Overall shoreline evolution between 1950 and 1974: EPR = −0.12 m/year, NSM = −2.96 m, overall error = ±0.20 m/year; (<b>c</b>) Overall shoreline evolution between 1974 and 1992: EPR = +1.10 m/year, NSM = +19.47 m, overall error = ±0.28 m/year; (<b>d</b>) Overall shoreline evolution between 1992 and 2000: EPR = −0.20 m/year, NSM = −1.65 m, overall error = ±0.60 m/year; (<b>e</b>) Overall shoreline evolution between 2000 and 2010: EPR = +0.54 m/year, NSM = +5.58 m, overall error = ±0.44 m/year; (<b>f</b>) Overall shoreline evolution between 2010 and 2022: EPR = +1.45 m/year, NSM = +16.26 m, overall error = ±0.34 m/year.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Surface balances at the scale of the studied coastline per study period and the whole considered time span.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Projected evolution of the shoreline to the 100-year horizon according to scenario SP5-8.5; enlargement of the Epine sector (LS2-C). Blue line: distance in metres between the digitised 2022 shoreline and the projected 2122 shoreline. Red line: distance in metres between the projected 2022 shoreline and the projected 2122 shoreline. Orange line: presence of coastal protection structures.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Scenarios for the prospective evolution of the shoreline over 30-year and 100-year horizons. Projection distance based on the 2022 shoreline for stretches of coast with no longitudinal protection structures.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Percentage contribution of different coastal cells to the total surface balance over the studied periods. Each period is represented by a horizontal bar, subdivided into coloured segments corresponding to the relative percentages of different cells compared to the total surface balance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Enlarged view of a prospective map of Martinière Beach (LC2-C).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Number of buildings impacted by the uncertainty band, by municipality.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 6218 KiB  
Article
Using RS and GIS Techniques to Assess and Monitor Coastal Changes of Coastal Islands in the Marine Environment of a Humid Tropical Region
by Muhamed Fasil Chettiyam Thodi, Girish Gopinath, Udayar Pillai Surendran, Pranav Prem, Nadhir Al-Ansari and Mohamed A. Mattar
Water 2023, 15(21), 3819; https://doi.org/10.3390/w15213819 - 1 Nov 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3025
Abstract
Vypin, Vallarpadam, and Bolgatty are significant tropical coastal islands situated in the humid tropical Kerala region of India, notable for their environmental sensitivity. This study conducted a comprehensive assessment of shoreline alterations on these islands by integrating Remote Sensing (RS) and Geographic Information [...] Read more.
Vypin, Vallarpadam, and Bolgatty are significant tropical coastal islands situated in the humid tropical Kerala region of India, notable for their environmental sensitivity. This study conducted a comprehensive assessment of shoreline alterations on these islands by integrating Remote Sensing (RS) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) techniques. Utilizing satellite imagery from the LANDSAT series with a spatial resolution of 30 m, the analysis spanned the years from 1973 to 2019. The Digital Shoreline Analysis System (DSAS) tool, integrated into the ArcGIS software, was employed to monitor and analyze shoreline shifts, encompassing erosion and accretion. Various statistical parameters, including Net Shoreline Movement (NSM), End Point Rate (EPR), and Linear Regression Rate (LRR), were utilized to evaluate these changes. Additionally, the study aimed to discern the root causes of shoreline modifications in the study area, encompassing disturbances and the construction of new structures on these islands. The results conclusively demonstrated the substantial impact endured by these coastal islands, with accretion on both sides leading to the creation of new landmasses. This manuscript effectively illustrates that these islands have experienced marine transgression, notably evidenced by accretion. Anthropogenic activities were identified as the primary drivers behind the observed shoreline changes, underscoring the need for careful management and sustainable practices in these fragile coastal ecosystems. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The study area (A) Vypin Island (B) Vallarpadam Island (C) Bolgatty Island.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flow chart describing the methodology.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Shoreline map classification on EPR LRR and NSM on the three islands. (<b>A</b>) Vypin Island (<b>B</b>) Vallarpadam Island (<b>C</b>) Bolgatty Island.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Shoreline changes in three islands (<b>a</b>) line diagram (<b>b</b>) Lines depicted over the island.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Show the Google earth images southern part of three islands during 2001, 2007, 2015 and 2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Graph showing the net shoreline movement (NSM) for three islands (<b>A</b>) Vypin, (<b>B</b>) Vallarpadam, (<b>C</b>) Bolgatty island.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Graph showing the end point rate (EPR) for three islands (<b>A</b>) Vypin, (<b>B</b>) Vallarpadam, (<b>C</b>) Bolgatty island.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Graph showing the linear regression rate (LRR) for three islands (<b>A</b>) Vypin, (<b>B</b>) Vallarpadam, (<b>C</b>) Bolgatty island.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 12515 KiB  
Article
Anthropic Action on Historical Shoreline Changes and Future Estimates Using GIS: Guadarmar Del Segura (Spain)
by Marta Fernández-Hernández, Almudena Calvo, Luis Iglesias, Ricardo Castedo, Jose J. Ortega, Antonio J. Diaz-Honrubia, Pedro Mora and Elisa Costamagna
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(17), 9792; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13179792 - 30 Aug 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1249
Abstract
A good understanding of historical change rates is a key requirement for effective coastal zone management and reliable predictions of shoreline evolution. Historical shoreline erosion for the coast of Guardamar del Segura (Alicante, Spain) is analyzed based on aerial photographs dating from 1930 [...] Read more.
A good understanding of historical change rates is a key requirement for effective coastal zone management and reliable predictions of shoreline evolution. Historical shoreline erosion for the coast of Guardamar del Segura (Alicante, Spain) is analyzed based on aerial photographs dating from 1930 to 2022 using the Digital Shoreline Analysis System (DSAS). This area is of special interest because the construction of a breakwater in the 1990s, which channels the mouth of the Segura River, has caused a change in coastal behavior. The prediction of future shorelines is conducted up to the year 2040 using two models based on data analysis techniques: the extrapolation of historical data (including the uncertainty of the historical measurements) and the Bruun-type model (considering the effect of sea level rises). The extrapolation of the natural erosion of the area up to 1989 is also compared with the reality, already affected by anthropic actions, in the years 2005 and 2022. The construction of the breakwater has accelerated the erosion along the coast downstream of this infrastructure by about 260%, endangering several houses that are located on the beach itself. The estimation models predict transects with erosions ranging from centimeters (±70 cm) to tens of meters (±30 m). However, both models are often overlapping, which gives a band where the shoreline may be thought to be in the future. The extrapolation of erosion up to 1989, and its subsequent comparison, shows that in most of the study areas, anthropic actions have increased erosion, reaching values of more than 35 m of shoreline loss. The effect of anthropic actions on the coast is also analyzed on the housing on the beach of Babilonia, which has lost around 17% of its built-up area in 40 years. This work demonstrates the importance of historical analysis and predictions before making any significant changes in coastal areas to develop sustainable plans for coastal area management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Geohazards: Risk Assessment, Mitigation and Prevention)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Location of the study area. (<b>b</b>) Orthomosaic of the coast in 1930 and details of the transects used in the study. (<b>c</b>) Orthophoto of the coast in 2022. Note that the coordinates used are UTM ETRS89 H30N.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) View from north of Babilonia Beach on 2 April 2010. (<b>b</b>) View of Los Viveros artificial dune on 2 April 2010. (<b>c</b>) View from north of Babilonia Beach on 5 May 2021. (<b>d</b>) View from north of Los Viveros Beach and artificial dune on 13 August 2021.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Orthomosaic of the coast in 1930. (<b>b</b>) Orthomosaic of the coast in 1930 with the drawing of the shoreline. (<b>c</b>) Detail of the shoreline in the area of transects 4 and 8 (north of zone B in <a href="#applsci-13-09792-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>). (<b>d</b>) Detail of the shoreline in the area of transects 25 and 29 (south of zone C in <a href="#applsci-13-09792-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The upper graph shows the NSM of all transects in zones A, B and C in the periods 1930–1989 and 1997–2022. The lower graph shows the LRR values of each transect for the same zones and periods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Shorelines and transects 1 to 3 from 1930 to 1989 (background image from 1989). (<b>b</b>) Image from 2022 of the same area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Zone B. (<b>a</b>,<b>d</b>) Shorelines and transects from 1930 to 1989 (background image from 1989). (<b>b</b>,<b>e</b>) Shorelines and transects from 1997 to 2022 (background image from 2022). (<b>c</b>,<b>f</b>) Shorelines and transects from 1930 to 2022 (background image from 2022).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Zone C. (<b>a</b>,<b>d</b>) Shorelines and transects from 1930 to 1989 (background image from 1989). (<b>b</b>,<b>e</b>) Shorelines and transects from 1997 to 2022 (background image from 2022). (<b>c</b>,<b>f</b>) Shorelines and transects from 1930 to 2022 (background image from 2022).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Shoreline model predictions (Lth—Leatherman; LC—Lee and Clark) by year 2040: (<b>a</b>) general view of zone B; (<b>b</b>) detailed view of zone B; (<b>c</b>) detailed view of zone C; (<b>d</b>) general view for zone C.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a</b>) Cliff dune erosion since 1999, zone D. (<b>b</b>) Cliff dune erosion predictions (Lth—Leatherman; LC—Lee and Clark) by the year 2040.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Shoreline and area of possible erosion predicted with the LC model: (<b>a</b>) north of zone B by 2005; (<b>b</b>) middle sector of zone B by 2005; (<b>c</b>) north of zone B by 2022; (<b>d</b>) middle sector of zone B by 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Shoreline and area of possible erosion predicted with the LC model: (<b>a</b>) north of zone C by 2005; (<b>b</b>) middle sector of zone C by 2005; (<b>c</b>) north of zone C by 2022; (<b>d</b>) middle sector of zone C by 2022.</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 43199 KiB  
Article
Quantitative Characterization of Coastal Cliff Retreat and Landslide Processes at Portonovo–Trave Cliffs (Conero, Ancona, Italy) Using Multi-Source Remote Sensing Data
by Nicola Fullin, Enrico Duo, Stefano Fabbri, Mirko Francioni, Monica Ghirotti and Paolo Ciavola
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(17), 4120; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15174120 - 22 Aug 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1981
Abstract
The integration of multiple data sources, including satellite imagery, aerial photography, and ground-based measurements, represents an important development in the study of landslide processes. The combination of different data sources can be very important in improving our understanding of geological phenomena, especially in [...] Read more.
The integration of multiple data sources, including satellite imagery, aerial photography, and ground-based measurements, represents an important development in the study of landslide processes. The combination of different data sources can be very important in improving our understanding of geological phenomena, especially in cases of inaccessible areas. In this context, the study of coastal areas represents a real challenge for the research community, both for the inaccessibility of coastal slopes and for the numerous drivers that can control coastal processes (subaerial, marine, or endogenic). In this work, we present a case study of the Conero Regional Park (Northern Adriatic Sea, Ancona, Italy) cliff-top retreat, characterized by Neogenic soft rocks (flysch, molasse). In particular, the study is focused in the area between the beach of Portonovo and Trave (south of Ancona), which has been studied using aerial orthophoto acquired between 1978 and 2021, Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) photographs (and extracted photogrammetric model) surveyed in September 2021 and 2012 LiDAR data. Aerial orthophotos were analyzed through the United States Geological Survey’s (USGS) tool Digital Shoreline Analysis System (DSAS) to identify and estimate the top-cliff erosion. The results were supported by the analysis of wave data and rainfall from the correspondent period. It has been found that for the northernmost sector (Trave), in the examined period of 40 years, an erosion up to 40 m occurred. Furthermore, a Digital Elevation Model (DEM) of Difference (DoD) between a 2012 Digital Terrain Model (DTM) and a UAV Digital Surface Model (DSM) was implemented to corroborate the DSAS results, revealing a good agreement between the retreat areas, identified by DSAS, and the section of coast characterized by a high value of DoD. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Geological Applications of Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Location map of the study area. (<b>b</b>) Satellite image showing the study area delimited by a red line (image taken from GeoEye satellite database, 2020).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Geological setting of the study area [<a href="#B50-remotesensing-15-04120" class="html-bibr">50</a>] and “Sectors”: (1) Portonovo; (2) Mezzavalle; (3) Trave. Bedrock legend: SAA (Scaglia Rossa Fm., Upper Cretaceous–Medium Eocene); VAS (Scaglia Variegata Fm., Medium Eocene–Upper Eocene), SCC (Scaglia Cinerea Fm., Upper Eocene–Upper Oligocene), BIS (Bisciaro Fm., Lower Miocene), SCH (Schlier Fm., Lower Miocene–Upper Miocene), GNOa (Sapigno Fm. Upper Miocene), FCO (Colombacci Fm., Upper Miocene), Tv (Trave horizon, Lower Pliocene), FAA (Argille Azzurre Fm., Lower Pliocene–Lower Pleistocene). The Trave horizon is a natural stratum that forms a ridge outcropping from the sea in the northern section of the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Coastal points defined in front of the area of interest. The points are positioned on the 20-m depth contour of the bathymetric dataset provided by ARPAE.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Methodology followed in DSAS elaboration. (<b>a</b>) We used as cliff top the edge between vegetated slope and the bare cliff (showed by the red line). (<b>b</b>) The baseline (the blue line), i.e., the line from which all the transects origin, was created using a buffer of the identified shoreline, with the aim of obtaining transects as perpendicular as possible with respect to the coastline. (<b>c</b>) Image showing the baseline (in green) and the transects (in violet) obtained by DSAS elaboration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Picture showing distribution of different data through time. The overlap window is between 1998 and 2021.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>At Trave sector. (<b>a</b>) The Sapigno Fm., composed by gypsum, is thrusted on the younger Argille Azzurre Fm. The trend of coastline in this picture is N–NW/S–SE, and the attitude of the fault plane is 205/40 in Dip Direction and Dip convention. (<b>b</b>) Outcrop of the Argille Azzurre Fm. composed of marls, completely fractured in blocks of few centimeters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) Values of slope and (<b>b</b>) elevation: Trave sector shows the highest values for both the considered parameters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Summary of wave and rainfall parameters: (<b>a</b>) POT analysis of CNR–ISMAR data between 1994–2019 for the significant wave height (Hs) for coastal point CP005, showing the identified events. The peak value is highlighted by a red dot. (<b>b</b>) Precipitation recorded by the stations “Ancona Torrette” and “Ancona Regione RT-1638” in the period 1990–2021.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>NSM values calculated along transects, referred to the period 1978–2021: Portonovo and Trave sector showed the highest values of retreat. (<b>a</b>) Computed transects for the whole study area; (<b>b</b>) Focus at Portonovo sector; (<b>c</b>) Focus at Mezzavalle sector; (<b>d</b>) Focus at Trave sector.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>NSM values calculated along transects, referred to the period from 1998–2007: Trave sector results the most active sector. (<b>a</b>) Computed transects for the study area; (<b>b</b>) Focus at Portonovo sector; (<b>c</b>) Focus at Mezzavalle sector; (<b>d</b>) Focus at Trave sector.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>NSM values calculated along transects, referred to the period 2010–2021: Portonovo and Trave sectors result in the sectors most affected by retreating of the cliff top edge. (<b>a</b>) Computed transects for the study area. (<b>b</b>) Focus at Portonovo sector. (<b>c</b>) Focus at Mezzavalle sector. (<b>d</b>) Focus at Trave sector.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Results of DoDs comparison in the period from 2021–2012. Every sector is displayed in detail in scale 1:10,000. Analysis shows that the biggest height differences were recorded in Trave sector. (<b>a</b>) Computed DoDs for the study area; (<b>b</b>) Focus at Portonovo sector; (<b>c</b>) Focus at Mezzavalle sector; (<b>d</b>) Focus at Trave sector.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>The geological structure of Trave cliff (GNOa (Sapigno Fm. Upper Miocene) and FAA (Argille Azzurre Fm., Lower Pliocene–Lower Pleistocene)). The main thrusts are highlighted with red lines; the red arrows indicate the sense of movement between hanging wall and footwall in orange secondary thrusts with a lower slip. The trend of coastline in this picture is N/S, and the average attitude of the fault planes identified is 200/45 in Dip Direction and Dip convention.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 17487 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of the Stability of Muddy Coastline Based on Satellite Imagery: A Case Study in the Central Coasts of Jiangsu, China
by Bingxue Zhao, Yongxue Liu and Lei Wang
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(13), 3323; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15133323 - 29 Jun 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1540
Abstract
Monitoring the coastline dynamic can provide the basis for the balance of sediment erosion and deposition. The evaluation of coastal stability is beneficial to decision makers for the rational development and ecological conservation of coastal resources. The present study first collected 61 scenes [...] Read more.
Monitoring the coastline dynamic can provide the basis for the balance of sediment erosion and deposition. The evaluation of coastal stability is beneficial to decision makers for the rational development and ecological conservation of coastal resources. The present study first collected 61 scenes of remote sensing images and extracted the multi-temporal coastlines from the years 1990–2020 in Jiangsu Province, China using an improved waterline method. Given the characteristics of gentle slopes of our study area, we modified the coastlines using actual tidal level data to avoid the influence from different tidal regimes. Finally, the coastal stability analysis was conducted on the central coast of Jiangsu, which experiences frequent changes in erosion and siltation. The results showed that the coastline has changed significantly; the natural coastline decreased by 116 km, while the artificial coastline increased by 108 km. the area of tidal flats decreased by 1152 km2, and the average width of the tidal flats decreased from 8.83 km to 3.55 km. In general, the coastline advanced seawards for many years, mainly due to sediment siltation and tidal flat reclamation, with annual average rates of siltation and reclamation of 9.67 km/a and 40.75 km/a, respectively. The node of siltation and erosion migrated 1.8 km southwards, moving from the Sheyang Estuary to the Doulong Port. The coastal stability gradually decreased from north to south, by values of 88.5 km (40%) for stable coast and 63.97 km (28.9%) for extremely unstable coast. The most unstable coast came from frequent reclamation areas. The method in this study is expected to provide a reference for evaluating the stability of typical muddy coasts, and our results can provide a basis for the sustainable development, utilization, and protection of coastal areas. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the central Jiangsu coasts. (<b>a</b>) The orange shaded area indicates the extent of sand ridge in the study area; (<b>b</b>) the standard false-color composite (R: 5, G: 4, B: 3) of Landsat-8 OLI imaged at low tide, acquired at Greenwich Mean Time (GMT) 02:30:32, 23 February 2018.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Waterline extraction based on edge detection and mathematical morphology. (<b>a</b>) Landsat-8 OLI standard false-color composite (R: 5, G: 4, B: 3), acquired on 23 February 2018; (<b>b</b>) MNDWI water index; (<b>c</b>) canny operator for water and land segmentation; (<b>d</b>) results of waterline extraction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Theory of coastline position modification. <span class="html-italic">C</span><sub>1</sub> and <span class="html-italic">C</span><sub>2</sub> are two waterlines acquired at different times.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Changes in the type of coastline in the central Jiangsu coasts from 1990 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Lateral movement of the coastline in central Jiangsu from 1990 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Change rate of coastline in the central coast of Jiangsu from 1990 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Stability division along the central Jiangsu coast: (<b>a</b>) Spatial distribution of the stability index; (<b>b</b>) spatial distribution of stability grades.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Spatio-temporal distribution of reclamation areas along the central coast of Jiangsu. (<b>a</b>–<b>e</b>) Enlargement of partial reclamation areas.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 12186 KiB  
Article
Sediment Transport of Coastal Region Using Time-Series Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Spatial Data
by Sulki Kim, Sungyeol Chang, Sungwon Shin, Kideok Do and Inho Kim
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11(7), 1313; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11071313 - 28 Jun 2023
Viewed by 1235
Abstract
Continuous monitoring of the varying topographical characteristics of shorelines is important for effective coastal management. Closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras are installed to accumulate photographic data on coastal topographical changes. The overall change in the coastal waters can be intuitively understood from the images. [...] Read more.
Continuous monitoring of the varying topographical characteristics of shorelines is important for effective coastal management. Closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras are installed to accumulate photographic data on coastal topographical changes. The overall change in the coastal waters can be intuitively understood from the images. However, the amount of three-dimensional (3D) changes that can be grasped is limited. To address this, studies have employed aerial photogrammetry, which is the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to capture aerial pictures, construct 3D models of target areas, and perform analysis through scale-invariant feature transform and structure from motion technologies. Although highly efficient, this technique requires several ground-control points (GCPs), which could corrupt the overall imagery. This study designs real-time kinematics—global navigation satellite system (RTK–GNSS) UAV, which requires few GCPs. To evaluate the positional accuracy of the captured UAV orthographic images and digital surface models (DSMs) used for precise coastal terrain measurements, a virtual reference service survey was performed to determine the vertical errors. The R-squared was 0.985, which is close to 1.0. Short-term and one-year topographic changes before and after a storm were investigated using time-series UAV image data after a coastal maintenance project. Analysis of the coefficient of variation in the beach volume for one year revealed that submerged breakwater reduced erosion during high wave resistance. The submerged breakwater located in the center exhibited variability similar to the opening. Hence, this method is more suitable for periodically monitoring coastal areas. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Coastal Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the study area (Cheonjin–Bongpo Beach).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Before and after coastal maintenance work.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Wave observation points, W1 and WINK (from Google Earth).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Long-term wave rose (WINK).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Wave observation time series at W1 (Bongpo, <a href="#jmse-11-01313-f003" class="html-fig">Figure 3</a>) during Apr 2020–May 2021: (<b>a</b>) Significant wave height; (<b>b</b>) peak period; (<b>c</b>) peak direction (based on normal onshore direction); Blue line indicates the date of UAV survey.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Set of ground control point (GCP) locations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Three-dimensional (3D) modeling flowchart of aerial photogrammetry using UAV.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Accuracy analysis: (<b>a</b>) Numerical elevation model accuracy verification result. (<b>b</b>) Error histogram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Analysis criteria and areas: (<b>a</b>) beach width baseline; (<b>b</b>) beach area and volume zones.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Beach-volume and beach-width time series: (<b>a</b>) Beach width. (<b>b</b>) Beach volume for each zone with z-score normalization. Blue line indicates swell and red line indicates typhoon.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10 Cont.
<p>Beach-volume and beach-width time series: (<b>a</b>) Beach width. (<b>b</b>) Beach volume for each zone with z-score normalization. Blue line indicates swell and red line indicates typhoon.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Short-term topographical change (changes in beach elevation, red; accumulation, blue; erosion) and significant wave height, peak period, and peak wave direction during storms: (<b>a</b>) during typhoon; (<b>b</b>) swell; and (<b>c</b>) change in beach width.</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 9995 KiB  
Article
Assessing the Impact of the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami on South Andaman’s Coastal Shoreline: A Geospatial Analysis of Erosion and Accretion Patterns
by Saurabh Singh, Suraj Kumar Singh, Deepak Kumar Prajapat, Vikas Pandey, Shruti Kanga, Pankaj Kumar and Gowhar Meraj
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11(6), 1134; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11061134 - 28 May 2023
Cited by 32 | Viewed by 3947
Abstract
The 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami significantly impacted the coastal shoreline of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, causing widespread destruction of infrastructure and ecological damage. This study aims to analyze the short- and long-term shoreline changes in South Andaman, focusing on 2004–2005 [...] Read more.
The 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami significantly impacted the coastal shoreline of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, causing widespread destruction of infrastructure and ecological damage. This study aims to analyze the short- and long-term shoreline changes in South Andaman, focusing on 2004–2005 (pre- and post-tsunami) and 1990–2023 (to assess periodic changes). Using remote sensing techniques and geospatial tools such as the Digital Shoreline Analysis System (DSAS), shoreline change rates were calculated in four zones, revealing the extent of the tsunami’s impact. During the pre- and post-tsunami periods, the maximum coastal erosion rate was −410.55 m/year, while the maximum accretion was 359.07 m/year in zone A, the island’s east side. For the 1990–2023 period, the most significant coastal shoreline erosion rate was also recorded in zone A, which was recorded at −2.3 m/year. After analyzing the result, it can be seen that the tsunami severely affected the island’s east side. To validate the coastal shoreline measurements, the root mean square error (RMSE) of Landsat-7 and Google Earth was 18.53 m, enabling comparisons of the accuracy of different models on the same dataset. The results demonstrate the extensive impact of the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami on South Andaman’s coastal shoreline and the value of analyzing shoreline changes to understand the short- and long-term consequences of such events on coastal ecosystems. This information can inform conservation efforts, management strategies, and disaster response plans to mitigate future damage and allocate resources more efficiently. By better understanding the impact of tsunamis on coastal shorelines, emergency responders, government agencies, and conservationists can develop more effective strategies to protect these fragile ecosystems and the communities that rely on them. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural and Human Impacts in Coastal Areas)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study area map displaying (<b>a</b>) the India region, (<b>b</b>) the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, and (<b>c</b>) the selection of zones (A, B, C, and D) for assessing the immediate impact and periodical impact of the tsunami on South Andaman’s coastal shoreline.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>A shoreline dataset including baseline (black), transect (gray), and shoreline data (multicolor) to illustrate the relationship between net shoreline movement (NSM) and shoreline change envelope (SCE).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Comparison of root mean square error (RMSE) values for Landsat-7 and Google Earth, showcasing the accuracy of these data sources in analyzing coastal shoreline changes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Immediate coastal line changes (2004–2005) of zone A of South Andaman: (<b>a</b>) shoreline change envelop (SCE) showing the migration of the 2005 coastal line from the 2004 coastal line, and (<b>b</b>) end point rate (EPR) showing erosion and accretion of the coastal shoreline between 2004 and 2005.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Immediate coastal shoreline changes (2004–2005) of zone B, South Andaman: (<b>a</b>) shoreline change envelop (SCE) showing the migration of the 2005 coastal line from the 2004 coastal line, and (<b>b</b>) end point rate showing erosion and accretion of the coastal shoreline between 2004 and 2005.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Immediate coastal shoreline changes (2004–2005) of zone C, South Andaman: (<b>a</b>) shoreline change envelop (SCE) showing the migration of the 2005 coastal line from the 2004 coastal line, and (<b>b</b>) end point rate showing erosion and accretion of the coastal shoreline between 2004 and 2005.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Immediate coastal shoreline changes (2004–2005) of zone D, South Andaman: (<b>a</b>) shoreline change envelop (SCE) showing the migration of the 2005 coastal line from the 2004 coastal line, and (<b>b</b>) end point rate showing erosion and accretion of the coastal shoreline between 2004 and 2005.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Comprehensive representation of erosion and accretion patterns in the South Andaman coastal shoreline, categorized by zones, to demonstrate the varying impacts on each area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Periodical changes (1990–2023) of zone A, South Andaman: (<b>a</b>) showing the most significant distance between the shoreline, (<b>b</b>) distance between the oldest (1990) and most recent shorelines (2023), and (<b>c</b>) end point rate, showing erosion and accretion of the coastal shoreline between 1990 and 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Periodical changes (1990–2023) of zone B, South Andaman: (<b>a</b>) showing the most significant distance between the shoreline, (<b>b</b>) distance between the oldest (1990) and most recent shorelines (2023), and (<b>c</b>) end point rate, showing erosion and accretion of the coastal shoreline between 1990 and 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Periodical changes (1990–2023) of zone C, South Andaman: (<b>a</b>) showing the most significant distance between the shoreline, (<b>b</b>) distance between the oldest (1990) and most recent shorelines (2023), and (<b>c</b>) end point rate, showing erosion and accretion of the coastal shoreline between 1990 and 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Periodical changes (1990–2023) of zone D, South Andaman: (<b>a</b>) showing the most significant distance between the shoreline, (<b>b</b>) distance between the oldest (1990) and most recent shorelines (2023), and (<b>c</b>) end point rate, showing erosion and accretion of the coastal shoreline between 1990 and 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Comprehensive representation of periodical erosion and accretion patterns in the South Andaman coastal shoreline, categorized by zones, to demonstrate the varying impacts on each area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Cross-plot illustrating shoreline change through the linear regression rate (LRR), showcasing the relationship between shoreline positions and time.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 4365 KiB  
Article
Video-Monitoring Tools for Assessing Beach Morphodynamics in Tidal Beaches
by Juan Montes, Laura del Río, Theocharis A. Plomaritis, Javier Benavente, María Puig and Gonzalo Simarro
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(10), 2650; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15102650 - 19 May 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1767
Abstract
Beach behaviour and evolution are controlled by a large number of factors, being susceptible to human-derived pressures and the impacts of climate change. In order to understand beach behaviour at different scales, systematic monitoring programs that assess shoreline and volumetric changes are required. [...] Read more.
Beach behaviour and evolution are controlled by a large number of factors, being susceptible to human-derived pressures and the impacts of climate change. In order to understand beach behaviour at different scales, systematic monitoring programs that assess shoreline and volumetric changes are required. Video-monitoring systems are widely used in this regard, as they are cost-effective and acquire data automatically and continuously, even in bad weather conditions. This work presents a methodology to use the basic products of low-cost IP video cameras to identify both the cross-shore and long-shore variability of tidal beaches. Shorelines were automatically obtained, digital elevation models (DEMs) were generated and validated with real data, and the outputs were combined to analyse beach behaviour from a morphodynamic perspective. The proposed methodology was applied to La Victoria Beach (SW Spain) for the analysis of beach variations over a 5-year period. The combination of shoreline position analysis and data from DEMs facilitates understanding and provides a complete overview of beach behaviour, revealing alongshore differences in an apparently homogeneous beach. Furthermore, the methods used allowed us to inter-relate the different processes occurring on the beach, which is difficult to achieve with other types of techniques. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Remote Sensing in Coastal Geomorphology Ⅱ)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>A</b>) Location of the study area in SW Spain. (<b>B</b>) Position of the video-monitoring system (VMS) in the city of Cadiz. (<b>C</b>) General view of the VMS. (<b>D</b>–<b>F</b>) Areas covered by each camera.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Methodology used to analyse beach cross- and longshore evolution combining the automatic extraction of shorelines and the generation of DEMs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Example of shoreline extraction (green line) using a mask (yellow lines) to avoid features of the beach that might decrease the quality of the extraction. The background planview is in pixel coordinates.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>RTK-DGPS profiles used for the validation (orange dashed lines), profiles employed to extract slope and volume (blue lines), and an example of an extracted DEM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Analysis of shoreline position. (<b>A</b>) Planview of La Victoria Beach with the baseline (yellow line) used for the analysis. (<b>B</b>) Mean shoreline position with respect to the baseline. (<b>C</b>) Result of EOF analysis. (<b>D</b>) Evolution of EOF amplitudes along the study period. (<b>E</b>) Evolution of mean shoreline position along the study period.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Results of the DEM validation (XYZ-dependent parameters, slope, and volume) using the two RTK-DGPS profiles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Upper panel: evolution of beach slope in each profile of La Victoria Beach over the studied period, where profile 1 is the northernmost one and profile 14 is the southernmost one. Lower panel: variability in beach slope along the analysed profiles for each survey, where the red lines are the median, the limits of the boxes are the 25th and 75th percentiles, and the markers are the outliers.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Upper panel: evolution of the normalized volume in each profile of La Victoria Beach over the studied period, where profile 1 is the northernmost one and profile 14 is the southernmost one. Lower panel: variability in the volume along the analysed profiles for each survey, where the red lines are the median, the limits of the boxes are the 25th and 75th percentiles, and the markers are the outliers.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparison of beach profiles from RTK-DGPS surveys (blue lines) and DEMs (yellow lines) on different dates.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 18038 KiB  
Article
Decoding Chambal River Shoreline Transformations: A Comprehensive Analysis Using Remote Sensing, GIS, and DSAS
by Saurabh Singh, Gowhar Meraj, Pankaj Kumar, Suraj Kumar Singh, Shruti Kanga, Brian Alan Johnson, Deepak Kumar Prajapat, Jatan Debnath and Dhrubajyoti Sahariah
Water 2023, 15(9), 1793; https://doi.org/10.3390/w15091793 - 7 May 2023
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 5222
Abstract
Illegal sand mining has been identified as a significant cause of harm to riverbanks, as it leads to excessive removal of sand from rivers and negatively impacts river shorelines. This investigation aimed to identify instances of shoreline erosion and accretion at illegal sand [...] Read more.
Illegal sand mining has been identified as a significant cause of harm to riverbanks, as it leads to excessive removal of sand from rivers and negatively impacts river shorelines. This investigation aimed to identify instances of shoreline erosion and accretion at illegal sand mining sites along the Chambal River. These sites were selected based on a report submitted by the Director of the National Chambal Sanctuary (NCS) to the National Green Tribunal (NGT) of India. The digital shoreline analysis system (DSAS v5.1) was used during the elapsed period from 1990 to 2020. Three statistical parameters used in DSAS—the shoreline change envelope (SCE), endpoint rate (EPR), and net shoreline movement (NSM)—quantify the rates of shoreline changes in the form of erosion and accretion patterns. To carry out this study, Landsat imagery data (T.M., ETM+, and OLI) and Sentinel-2A/MSI from 1990 to 2020 were used to analyze river shoreline erosion and accretion. The normalized difference water index (NDWI) and modified normalized difference water index (MNDWI) were used to detect riverbanks in satellite images. The investigation results indicated that erosion was observed at all illegal mining sites, with the highest erosion rate of 1.26 m/year at the Sewarpali site. On the other hand, the highest accretion was identified at the Chandilpura site, with a rate of 0.63 m/year. We observed significant changes in river shorelines at illegal mining and unmined sites. Erosion and accretion at unmined sites are recorded at −0.18 m/year and 0.19 m/year, respectively, which are minor compared to mining sites. This study’s findings on the effects of illegal sand mining on river shorelines will be helpful in the sustainable management and conservation of river ecosystems. These results can also help to develop and implement river sand mining policies that protect river ecosystems from the long-term effects of illegal sand mining. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Hydrology: Flow and Velocity Analysis in Rivers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Illustration of a sand and gravel streambed and the impact of illegal sand mining. (<b>a</b>) Nick points, where the streambed is abruptly lowered due to pit excavation, can be seen. (<b>b</b>) Downstream from the nick point, the streambed deteriorates when flow rates are high due to the lack of sediment replenishment caused by the mining.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Comparison of channel cross-sections. (<b>a</b>) shows a typical sand–gravel bar inside the low-flow channel, while (<b>b</b>) depicts the impact of uncontrolled mining resulting in a large shallow channel with severe bank erosion.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Illegal sand mining sites along the Chambal River. (<b>a</b>) Map of India ap providing regional context, (<b>b</b>) illegal sand mining site in Dholpur and Morena regions within the Chambal River, and (<b>c</b>) inset showing stretch of illegal mining sites and unmined site. Map coordinates are UTM WGS 84.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Flowchart diagram illustrating the methodology for evaluating erosion and accretion at mining sites. The diagram outlines the steps to analyze the satellite images and geospatial data, including spectral indices and a digital shoreline analysis system (DSAS) to calculate shoreline erosion and accretion rates.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>NDWI and MNDWI cover a 10 km riverbank buffer for 20 years. Remote sensing indices including the NDWI and MNDWI identify and map open water bodies such as rivers and wetlands and estimate water extent changes over time. (<b>a</b>) NDWI 2000, (<b>b</b>) MNDWI 2000, (<b>c</b>) NDWI 2010, (<b>d</b>) MNDWI 2010, (<b>e</b>) NDWI 2020, and (<b>f</b>) MNDWI 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Net shoreline movement profiles of Chambal River showing the changes in shoreline position over time, as calculated by the digital shoreline analysis system (DSAS) model. Panel (<b>a</b>) presents the profiles for Jhiri sand mining zones, panel (<b>b</b>) presents the profiles for Sewarpali sand mining zones, and panel (<b>c</b>) presents the profiles for Chandilpura sand mining zones.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6 Cont.
<p>Net shoreline movement profiles of Chambal River showing the changes in shoreline position over time, as calculated by the digital shoreline analysis system (DSAS) model. Panel (<b>a</b>) presents the profiles for Jhiri sand mining zones, panel (<b>b</b>) presents the profiles for Sewarpali sand mining zones, and panel (<b>c</b>) presents the profiles for Chandilpura sand mining zones.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Endpoint Rate Profiles of Sand Mining Zones of the Chambal River. This figure presents the endpoint rate profiles of the three sand mining zones, namely (<b>a</b>) Jhiri (<b>b</b>) Sewarpali (<b>c</b>) Chandilpura.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7 Cont.
<p>Endpoint Rate Profiles of Sand Mining Zones of the Chambal River. This figure presents the endpoint rate profiles of the three sand mining zones, namely (<b>a</b>) Jhiri (<b>b</b>) Sewarpali (<b>c</b>) Chandilpura.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Comparative endpoint Rate of all transects of Sand Mining Zones.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparative erosion and accretion rates at three study sites. This figure presents the estimated erosion and accretion rates for the three study sites as determined by the DSAS model. These estimates suggest notable variations in the study area’s geomorphic processes and sediment dynamics.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Endpoint Rate Profile of Unmined Site (Basai Neem).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Comparative Erosion and Accretion Rates at Four Study Sites, including Basai Neem (Unmined Site).</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 15896 KiB  
Article
Analysis of Multi-Temporal Shoreline Changes Due to a Harbor Using Remote Sensing Data and GIS Techniques
by Sanjana Zoysa, Vindhya Basnayake, Jayanga T. Samarasinghe, Miyuru B. Gunathilake, Komali Kantamaneni, Nitin Muttil, Uttam Pawar and Upaka Rathnayake
Sustainability 2023, 15(9), 7651; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097651 - 6 May 2023
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 4382
Abstract
Coastal landforms are continuously shaped by natural and human-induced forces, exacerbating the associated coastal hazards and risks. Changes in the shoreline are a critical concern for sustainable coastal zone management. However, a limited amount of research has been carried out on the coastal [...] Read more.
Coastal landforms are continuously shaped by natural and human-induced forces, exacerbating the associated coastal hazards and risks. Changes in the shoreline are a critical concern for sustainable coastal zone management. However, a limited amount of research has been carried out on the coastal belt of Sri Lanka. Thus, this study investigates the spatiotemporal evolution of the shoreline dynamics on the Oluvil coastline in the Ampara district in Sri Lanka for a two-decade period from 1991 to 2021, where the economically significant Oluvil Harbor exists by utilizing remote sensing and geographic information system (GIS) techniques. Shorelines for each year were delineated using Landsat 5 Thematic Mapper (TM), Landsat 7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+), and Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager images. The Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) was applied as a spectral value index approach to differentiate land masses from water bodies. Subsequently, the Digital Shoreline Analysis System (DSAS) tool was used to assess shoreline changes, including Shoreline Change Envelope (SCE), Net Shoreline Movement (NSM), End Point Rate (EPR), and Linear Regression Rate (LRR). The results reveal that the Oluvil coast has undergone both accretion and erosion over the years, primarily due to harbor construction. The highest SCE values were calculated within the Oluvil harbor region, reaching 523.8 m. The highest NSM ranges were recorded as −317.1 to −81.3 m in the Oluvil area and 156.3–317.5 m in the harbor and its closest point in the southern direction. The maximum rate of EPR was observed to range from 3 m/year to 10.7 m/year towards the south of the harbor, and from −10.7 m/year to −3.0 m/year towards the north of the harbor. The results of the LRR analysis revealed that the rates of erosion anomaly range from −3 m/year to −10 m/year towards the north of the harbor, while the beach advances at a rate of 3 m/year to 14.3 m/year towards the south of the harbor. The study area has undergone erosion of 40 ha and accretion of 84.44 ha. These findings can serve as valuable input data for sustainable coastal zone management along the Oluvil coast in Sri Lanka, safeguarding the coastal habitats by mitigating further anthropogenic vulnerabilities. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location map of the study area—Oluvil Harbor, Sri Lanka.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic diagram of methodological procedures.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Extracted shorelines from Landsat satellite imageries (1991–2021).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Spatial variation of Oluvil coastline trends: (<b>a</b>) For 1991–2000; (<b>b</b>) For 2000–2008; (<b>c</b>) For 2008–2021.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Google Earth Pro Images used to study the periodic change of Oluvil Coastline from 2000–2021 (accessed on 30 December 2022).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>DSAS Statics of the Oluvil coast area: (<b>a</b>) For SCE; (<b>b</b>) For NSM; (<b>c</b>) For EPR; (<b>d</b>) For LRR.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6 Cont.
<p>DSAS Statics of the Oluvil coast area: (<b>a</b>) For SCE; (<b>b</b>) For NSM; (<b>c</b>) For EPR; (<b>d</b>) For LRR.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Eroded and accreted areas in the Oluvil coast during 2008–2021 (accessed on 30 December 2022).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Eroded and accreted areas in the Oluvil coastline (accessed on 7 January 2023).</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop