[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (610)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = GeoDetector

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
26 pages, 4080 KiB  
Article
Spatio-Temporal Distribution and Spatial Spillover Effects of Net Carbon Emissions: A Case Study of Shaanxi Province, China
by Yi-Jie Sun, Zi-Yu Guo, Chang-Zheng Zhu, Yang Shao and Fei-Peng Yang
Sustainability 2025, 17(3), 1205; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031205 - 2 Feb 2025
Viewed by 408
Abstract
Scientifically evaluating net carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions is the pivotal strategy for mitigating global climate change and fostering sustainable urban development. Shaanxi Province is situated in central China, and boasts robust energy resources in the north and a significant carbon-sink zone [...] Read more.
Scientifically evaluating net carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions is the pivotal strategy for mitigating global climate change and fostering sustainable urban development. Shaanxi Province is situated in central China, and boasts robust energy resources in the north and a significant carbon-sink zone in the southern Qinling Mountains. Therefore, uncovering the spatial distributions of net CO2 emissions and identifying its influencing factors across cities in Shaanxi Province would furnish a crucial theoretical foundation for advancing low-carbon development strategies. In this research, the net CO2 emissions of cities in Shaanxi Province from 2005 to 2020 are calculated using the carbon-emission-factor calculation model, then the Geodetector is utilized to evaluate the single-factor explanatory power and two-factor interactions among the fourteen various influencing variables, and then the spatial econometric model is employed to analyze the spatial spillover effects of these key factors. The results show the following: (1) The net CO2 emissions present significant regional differences among the ten cities of Shaanxi Province, notably Xi’an City, Yulin City, and Weinan City, which have recorded remarkable contributions with the respective totals reaching 72.2593 million tons, 76.3031 million tons, and 58.1646 million tons. (2) Regarding temporal trend changes, the aggregate net CO2 emissions across whole province underwent a marked expansion from 2005 to 2019. Yulin City and Shangluo City exhibit remarkable surges, with respective average annual growth rates soaring at 7.38% and 7.39%. (3) From the perspective of influencing factors, GDP exhibits the most pronounced correlation spanning the entire province. Meanwhile, foreign investment emerges as a significant contributor specifically in Xi’an and Yulin City. Moreover, interaction detection reveals most factor combinations exhibit bi-enhancement, while a few exhibits intricate and non-linear enhancement. (4) The SDM regression and fixed-effect analysis reveal that city GDP had a positive spillover effect on neighboring cities’ net CO2 emission, while investment in scientific research and technology services, along with per capita construction land, exhibit notable negative spillovers, suggesting potential emission reduction benefits across cities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue CO2 Capture and Utilization: Sustainable Environment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Administrative regional planning and spatial distribution of land use in Shaanxi province in 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The total quantity of carbon source and carbon sink in Shaanxi Province from 2005 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Spatial Distribution of carbon sources (<b>left</b>-(<b>a</b>)) and carbon sinks (<b>right</b>-(<b>b</b>)) of Shaanxi Province in 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>NCE of cities in Shaanxi Province from 2005 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Spatial distribution of the annual values of NCE in Shaanxi Province from 2005 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p><span class="html-italic">Q</span> value of each discrete scheme of each factor in Shaanxi Province.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p><span class="html-italic">Q</span> value of each factor in Shaanxi Province and different cities.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p><span class="html-italic">Q</span> value of each factor combination of interaction detection in the cities of Shaanxi.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 11614 KiB  
Article
Analysis of the Spatial–Temporal Characteristics of Vegetation Cover Changes in the Loess Plateau from 1995 to 2020
by Zhihong Yao, Yichao Huang, Yiwen Zhang, Qinke Yang, Peng Jiao and Menghao Yang
Land 2025, 14(2), 303; https://doi.org/10.3390/land14020303 - 1 Feb 2025
Viewed by 312
Abstract
The Loess Plateau is one of the most severely affected regions by soil erosion in the world, with a fragile ecological environment. Vegetation plays a key role in the region’s ecological restoration and protection. This study employs the Geographical Detector (Geodetector) model to [...] Read more.
The Loess Plateau is one of the most severely affected regions by soil erosion in the world, with a fragile ecological environment. Vegetation plays a key role in the region’s ecological restoration and protection. This study employs the Geographical Detector (Geodetector) model to quantitatively assess the impact of natural and human factors, such as temperature, precipitation, soil type, and land use, on vegetation growth. It aims to reveal the characteristics and driving mechanisms of vegetation cover changes on the Loess Plateau over the past 26 years. The results indicate that from 1995 to 2020, the vegetation coverage on the Loess Plateau shows an increasing trend, with a fitted slope of 0.01021 and an R2 of 0.96466. The Geodetector indicates that the factors with the greatest impact on vegetation cover in the Loess Plateau are temperature, precipitation, soil type, and land use. The highest average vegetation coverage is achieved when the temperature is between −4.8 and 2 °C or 12 and 16 °C, precipitation is between 630.64 and 935.51 mm, the soil type is leaching soil, and the land use type is forest. And the interaction between all factors has a greater effect on the vegetation cover than any single factor alone. This study reveals the factors influencing vegetation growth on the Loess Plateau, as well as their types and ranges, providing a scientific basis and guidance for improving vegetation coverage in this region. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Map of the Loess Plateau geographic location.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The long−term average precipitation and temperature values of the Loess Plateau: (<b>a</b>) temperature; (<b>b</b>) precipitation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Monthly average NDVI from 2001 to 2015.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Spatial distributions of natural and human factors in 2020: (<b>a</b>) slope; (<b>b</b>) aspect; (<b>c</b>) temperature; (<b>d</b>) precipitation; (<b>e</b>) soil type; (<b>f</b>) land use type; (<b>g</b>) population density; and (<b>h</b>) GDP.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The principle of geographical detector.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Annual mean FVC changes in the Loess Plateau from 1995 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Trend of vegetation coverage change from 1995 to 2020, using the Mann–Kendall test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Average FVC value for each precipitation zone in 1995, 2000, 2010, and 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Average FVC value for each temperature zone in 1995, 2000, 2010, and 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Average FVC under different soil types in 1995, 2000, 2010, and 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Average FVC under different land use types in 1995, 2000, 2010, and 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p><span class="html-italic">q</span> value for detection of interaction effects of various factors in 1995, 2000, 2010, and 2020: (<b>a</b>) 1995; (<b>b</b>) 2000; (<b>c</b>) 2010; (<b>d</b>) 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12 Cont.
<p><span class="html-italic">q</span> value for detection of interaction effects of various factors in 1995, 2000, 2010, and 2020: (<b>a</b>) 1995; (<b>b</b>) 2000; (<b>c</b>) 2010; (<b>d</b>) 2020.</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 14810 KiB  
Article
Spatiotemporal Coupling of New-Type Urbanization and Ecosystem Services in the Huaihe River Basin, China: Heterogeneity and Regulatory Strategy
by Muyi Huang, Qin Guo, Guozhao Zhang, Yuru Tang and Xue Wu
Land 2025, 14(2), 286; https://doi.org/10.3390/land14020286 - 30 Jan 2025
Viewed by 293
Abstract
Strengthening the exploration of synergistic promotion mechanisms between ecosystem services (ESs) and new urbanization is of great significance for watershed development. In this work, we revealed the evolution mechanism of coupling coordination development degree (CCD) between ESs and new urbanization and its driving [...] Read more.
Strengthening the exploration of synergistic promotion mechanisms between ecosystem services (ESs) and new urbanization is of great significance for watershed development. In this work, we revealed the evolution mechanism of coupling coordination development degree (CCD) between ESs and new urbanization and its driving factors in the Huaihe River Basin (HRB) from 1980 to 2020 using a combination of the CCD model, Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis (ESDA) method, and GeoDetector model. Additionally, we employed the PLUS model to investigate multi-scenario simulations. The results demonstrate that ESs showed a decline initially, followed by an increase, while the urbanization index showed consistent annual growth over the four decades. Furthermore, the CCD between the ESs and urbanization showed a yearly optimization trend. The CCD demonstrated notable spatial clustering characteristics, with factors such as precipitation, distance from water body, elevation, and per area GDP emerged as the primary drivers. Under scenarios of ecological protection, comprehensive development, and natural protection, the value of ESs from 2020 to 2050 maintained an upward trend; however, it fell with the decrease under the scenario of cropland protection. These research findings offer valuable decision-making support for the differentiated regulation of ecosystem functions and promotion of high-quality urbanization development in the HRB. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Scope of the study area (<b>a</b>) and information on its land use and DEM (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The connotation and path of the coupling effect between ESs and new urbanization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Technical roadmap.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The temporal change in total ESV in the HRB from 1980 to 2020 (<b>a</b>), and the comparison of Provincial variation in total ESV(<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The spatial characteristics of ESV (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>), ESV comparison (<b>c</b>), and ESV change (<b>d</b>) in the HRB from 1980 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The changing trend in urbanization development in the HRB from 1980 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The spatial characteristic of the UI (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>), UI comparsion (<b>c</b>), and UI change (<b>d</b>) in the HRB from 1980 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Changes in the amount of the absolute (<b>a</b>) and the relative CCD (<b>b</b>) in 40 cities from 1980 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Chordal diagram of the CCD transition at 3 stages from 1980 to 2000 (<b>a</b>), from 2000 to 2020 (<b>b</b>), and from 1980 to 2020 (<b>c</b>) in the HRB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The spatial characteristic of the CCD (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>). The change characteristics of CCD (<b>c</b>). Moran’s <span class="html-italic">I</span> of ESV, UI and CCD in the HRB from 1980 to 2020 (<b>d</b>). The CCD Hot Spot analysis (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The results of factor detector (<b>a</b>) and interaction detector (<b>b</b>) for the CCD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Trends in ecosystem service value under various scenarios from 1980 to 2050.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 12483 KiB  
Article
Spatiotemporal Analysis of Drought and Its Driving Factors in the Yellow River Basin Based on a Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index
by Chong Wei, Danning Su, Dongbao Zhao, Yixuan Li, Junwei He, Zhiguo Wang, Lianhai Cao and Huicong Jia
Atmosphere 2025, 16(2), 145; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16020145 - 28 Jan 2025
Viewed by 383
Abstract
As a natural disaster, drought can endanger global ecology, socio-economic systems, and sustainable development. To address sudden droughts in the future, assess drought disasters, and propose mitigation measures, in-depth research on the spatiotemporal variations in and driving factors of meteorological drought is essential. [...] Read more.
As a natural disaster, drought can endanger global ecology, socio-economic systems, and sustainable development. To address sudden droughts in the future, assess drought disasters, and propose mitigation measures, in-depth research on the spatiotemporal variations in and driving factors of meteorological drought is essential. To study drought in the Yellow River Basin, we calculated the multi-scale Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI), derived from monthly meteorological data recorded at weather stations from 1968 to 2019. We examined the features of drought and its driving factors using the trend-free pre-whitening Mann–Kendall (TFPW-MK) test and Sen’s slope estimator, as well as a drought frequency analysis, center of gravity migration model, standard deviation ellipse model, and geographic detector. Our analysis shows that (1) from 1968 to 2019, the Yellow River Basin exhibited a shift from aridity to increased moisture on an annual basis, with the smallest SPEI of −1.47 in 2002 indicating a moderate drought; SPEI3 showed a growing tendency in all seasons, particularly in winter (0.00388/year), followed by spring (0.00214/year), summer (0.00232/year), and fall (0.00196/year). The SPEI3 exhibited higher fluctuations in frequency compared to the annual-scale SPEI12; (2) in terms of spatial variability, there was no significant change in drought conditions at any scale, with the probability of a drought event being greater in the eastern and northwestern portions of the watershed. The epicenter of the drought exhibited a tendency to migrate southwestward; (3) among the seven driving factors, land use and night lighting were the dominant factors affecting drought conditions, with driving force values of 0.75 and 0.63, respectively. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>A land use map of the Yellow River Basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Map of meteorological station distribution in the Yellow River Basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Variation in SPEI12 in the Yellow River Basin from 1968 to 2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>SPEI3 variation in the Yellow River Basin in (<b>A</b>) spring, (<b>B</b>) summer, (<b>C</b>) autumn, and (<b>D</b>) winter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Sen’s Slope estimator and TFPW-MK test results for the Yellow River Basin from 1968 to 2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Drought frequency distribution map for the Yellow River Basin from 1968 to 2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Centroid migration trajectory map from 1970 to 2015.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Standard deviation ellipse diagrams for drought events from 1970 to 2010.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Seasonal Sen’s Slope estimator and TFPW-MK test results for the Yellow River Basin from 1968 to 2019. (<b>A</b>) Spring, (<b>B</b>) summer, (<b>C</b>) autumn, and (<b>D</b>) winter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Seasonal drought frequency distribution map from 1968 to 2019. (<b>A</b>) Spring, (<b>B</b>) summer, (<b>C</b>) autumn, and (<b>D</b>) winter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Seasonal centroid migration trajectories from 1970 to 2015. (<b>A</b>) Spring, (<b>B</b>) summer, (<b>C</b>) autumn, (<b>D</b>) and winter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Standard deviation ellipse for each season from 1970 to 2010. (<b>A</b>) Spring, (<b>B</b>) summer, (<b>C</b>) autumn, and (<b>D</b>) winter.</p>
Full article ">
26 pages, 2436 KiB  
Article
Quantifying the Driving Forces of Water Conservation Using Geodetector with Optimized Parameters: A Case Study of the Yiluo River Basin
by Kang Li, Hui Qian, Siqi Li, Zhiming Cao, Panpan Tian, Xiaoxin Shi, Jie Chen and Yanyan Gao
Land 2025, 14(2), 274; https://doi.org/10.3390/land14020274 - 28 Jan 2025
Viewed by 319
Abstract
Accurately identifying the impact of different factors on water conservation is influenced by the spatial grid scale. However, existing studies on water conservation often overlook the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (MAUP). MAUP is one of the key factors contributing to the uncertainty in [...] Read more.
Accurately identifying the impact of different factors on water conservation is influenced by the spatial grid scale. However, existing studies on water conservation often overlook the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (MAUP). MAUP is one of the key factors contributing to the uncertainty in spatial analysis results. The Qinling Mountains are a critical water conservation area, with the Yiluo River Basin (YLRB) as a key sub-basin. This study uses the Optimized Parameter GeoDetector (OPGD) model to analyze water conservation changes and influencing factors in the YLRB from 1990 to 2020. By optimizing spatial scale (2 km grid) and driving factor discretization, the OPGD model addresses spatial heterogeneity and the MAUP, enhancing analysis accuracy. Results show a fluctuating upward trend in water conservation depth, averaging 0.94 mm yearly, with a spatial decline from southwest to northeast. High–high and low–low clusters dominate the region, with some areas consistently showing high or low values. Key conservation zones expanded by 2748 km2, reflecting significant enhancement. Natural factors, particularly precipitation, predominantly influence water conservation, outweighing human activities. The interaction between precipitation and temperature notably affects dynamic changes, while human impacts, such as land use, play a secondary role. The findings suggest water management should prioritize climatic factors and integrate land-use policies to enhance conservation. The OPGD model’s application improves factor identification and supports targeted ecological and water management strategies. Full article
21 pages, 24192 KiB  
Article
Study on the Eco-Environmental Index and Its Application: A Case Study of the Surablak Coal Fire Area, Xinjiang, China
by Jie Gao and Qiang Zeng
Fire 2025, 8(2), 53; https://doi.org/10.3390/fire8020053 - 27 Jan 2025
Viewed by 598
Abstract
Coal fires are disasters that occur when underground coal seams are subjected to combustion conditions induced by natural or human factors. This study attempts to investigate the impact of coal fires on the surrounding environment by assessing the eco-environmental quality and its dynamic [...] Read more.
Coal fires are disasters that occur when underground coal seams are subjected to combustion conditions induced by natural or human factors. This study attempts to investigate the impact of coal fires on the surrounding environment by assessing the eco-environmental quality and its dynamic changes in the Surablak coal fire area. To achieve this, an improved remote sensing ecological index (termed RSEIds) is introduced to assess and track the quality and dynamics of eco-environmental conditions in the Surablak coal fire area from 1990 to 2022. Subsequently, this index is combined with a geographic detector (GeoDetector) model to identify potential factors influencing eco-environmental quality. The findings indicate that (1) compared with the established Remote Sensing Ecological Index (RSEI), the RSEIds provides a high degree of precision in reflecting the eco-environmental conditions within the regions affected by coal fires, (2) the eco-environmental quality within the Surablak coal fire area underwent a continuous deterioration from 1990 to 2022, with the area of ecological degradation constituting 53.41% of the study region, (3) regions with excellent and good RSEIds values are mainly found in the forested mountainous regions located in the northern section of the coal fire area, whereas regions with poor and fair RSEIds values largely coincide with the coal fire locations, and (4) since 2006, the distance to the coal fire has become the key factor influencing eco-environmental quality in the Surablak area, while temperature and precipitation remained important factors. The outcomes of this study will provide essential references for guiding ecological restoration and promoting sustainable development in coal fire areas. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Coal Fires and Their Impact on the Environment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The geographical location of the study area. (<b>a</b>) DEM. (<b>b</b>) Study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flowchart of Spatiotemporal Change Analysis of RSEIds.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Comparative results of eco-environmental quality within Surablak coal fire area in 2022 under RSEIds and RSEI models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Spatiotemporal distribution of RSEIds quality levels within the Surablak coal fire area, 1990–2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Distribution of area (<b>a</b>) and percentage (<b>b</b>) across different RSEIds levels within Surablak coal fire area, 1990–2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Spatiotemporal distribution of RSEIds change types in the Surablak fire area, 1990–2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Distribution of RSEIds level changes in Surablak fire area, 1990–2006, 2006–2022, and 1990–2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Chord diagram of “From-to” changes in RSEIds levels, 1990–2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Interactive effects of paired factors on eco-environmental quality within the Surablak coal fire area, 1990–2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Examination of the accuracy of the RSEIds index based on the 2022 RSEIds, the 1990–2022 RSEIds change types, and Google Earth images.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 7112 KiB  
Article
The Coordinated Development Characteristics of Rural Industry and Employment: A Case Study of Chongqing, China
by Guoqin Ge, Yong Huang and Qianting Chen
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2025, 14(2), 48; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi14020048 - 26 Jan 2025
Viewed by 535
Abstract
Developing industries and promoting employment are essential for rural revitalization. This study establishes a theoretical framework to support the coordinated development of rural industry and employment (RIE) with Chongqing, China as the study area. Methods include GIS spatial analysis, the entropy-weighted TOPSIS method, [...] Read more.
Developing industries and promoting employment are essential for rural revitalization. This study establishes a theoretical framework to support the coordinated development of rural industry and employment (RIE) with Chongqing, China as the study area. Methods include GIS spatial analysis, the entropy-weighted TOPSIS method, a coupled coordination degree model, and an optimal-parameter-based GeoDetector. The analysis examines the spatio-temporal evolution and driving mechanisms of the coordinated development of RIE. The main findings are as follows. (1) During the study period, Chongqing’s RIE improved significantly overall, although rural industry is relatively lagging. (2) The evolution characteristics of the coordinated development of RIE exhibit “spatio-temporal ripple” and “spindle-shaped” patterns, and the spatial agglomeration has been enhanced. The growth of RIE is accompanied by the spatial diffusion of rural industry and the spatial echo of rural employment. (3) The primary driving mechanism for the coordinated development of RIE is “human-centered, natural resource-based socio-economic development.” Finally, this study discusses employment-centered strategies for rural industrial development, providing a theoretical foundation for policy-making in rural industrial development. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Coordinated development framework of RIE.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Location of the study area. These maps were drawn according to the standard map with drawing No. GS (2024) 0650, which was downloaded from the standard map service website of the Ministry of Natural Resources of the People’s Republic of China. No modifications were made to the base map.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Comprehensive evaluation index for the subsystem of RIE. The X-axis represents the spatial distance from each county to the city hall, arranged in increasing order from left to right.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Types of and impediments to coordinated development of RIE. (<b>a</b>) Types of coordinated development; (<b>b</b>) impediments to coordinated development.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Spatio-temporal characteristics of RIE based on relative proximity. (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) Relative proximity of rural industry; (<b>b</b>–<b>f</b>) relative proximity of rural employment; (<b>g</b>–<b>i</b>) the coupling degree of RIE.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Interaction detection results of the factors influencing RIE’s coordinated development.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Mechanism framework for the evolution of the coordinated development of RIE. Solid lines between the five drivers indicate significant interactions, and dashed lines indicate minor interactions.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 8342 KiB  
Article
Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Cultivated Land Productivity in a Large City: Case Study of Chengdu, Sichuan, China
by Yuanli Liu, Qiang Liao, Zhouling Shao, Wenbo Gao, Jie Cao, Chunyan Chen, Guitang Liao, Peng He and Zhengyu Lin
Land 2025, 14(2), 239; https://doi.org/10.3390/land14020239 - 23 Jan 2025
Viewed by 362
Abstract
Given the constraints of limited cultivated land resources, ensuring and enhancing crop productivity are crucial for food security. This study takes Chengdu as a case study. Using the cultivated land productivity (CLP) evaluation model, we calculated the cultivated land productivity index (CLPI) and [...] Read more.
Given the constraints of limited cultivated land resources, ensuring and enhancing crop productivity are crucial for food security. This study takes Chengdu as a case study. Using the cultivated land productivity (CLP) evaluation model, we calculated the cultivated land productivity index (CLPI) and analyzed its spatial distribution characteristics. The Geographical Detector model was employed to identify the main factors influencing CLP, and corresponding countermeasures and measures were proposed based on the limiting degrees of these factors. The findings reveal that Chengdu’s CLP index ranges from 1231 to 3053. Global spatial autocorrelation analysis indicates a spatial agglomeration pattern in Chengdu’s overall crop productivity distribution. The local spatial autocorrelation analysis demonstrates that township (street)-level crop productivity in Chengdu is primarily characterized by “high–high”, “low–low”, and “low–high” clusters. Key factors influencing the spatial differentiation of CLP in Chengdu include the agronomic management level, soil bulk density, irrigation guarantee rate, soil body configuration, field slope, and farmland flood control standard. Interaction detection shows that there are both double-factor and nonlinear enhancements among the factors. Specifically, the interaction between soil bulk density and the agronomic management level among other factors have the most explanatory power for the spatial differentiation of CLP. The CLP in Chengdu is highly restricted by its technical level, with the agronomic management level severely limiting CLP by more than 50%. These research results provide a theoretical reference for regional high-standard farmland construction and the protection and utilization of cultivated land resources. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Land Use Policy and Food Security: 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Natural quality coefficient of cultivated land and technical level coefficient.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>CLPI grade.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Classification statistics of CLPI in each district and county of Chengdu.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Scatter plot of CLPI and local spatial autocorrelation cluster plot.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Spatial distribution of restricting degree of major factors.</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 10745 KiB  
Article
Identification and Analysis of Production–Living–Ecological Space Based on Multi-Source Geospatial Data: A Case Study of Xuzhou City
by Weilin Wang, Yindi Zhao, Caihong Ma and Simeng Dong
Sustainability 2025, 17(3), 886; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17030886 - 22 Jan 2025
Viewed by 514
Abstract
Effective production, living, and ecological space allocation is essential for improving and optimizing urban space development. In this study, we proposed a production–living–ecological space (PLES) identification method based on Point of Interest (POI) data and China Land Cover Dataset (CLCD) to identify PLESs [...] Read more.
Effective production, living, and ecological space allocation is essential for improving and optimizing urban space development. In this study, we proposed a production–living–ecological space (PLES) identification method based on Point of Interest (POI) data and China Land Cover Dataset (CLCD) to identify PLESs in Xuzhou City for the years 2012, 2018, and 2022, with an average recognition accuracy of 89.81%. Moreover, the land-use transfer matrix, center of gravity migration, and Geo-detector were used to reveal the spatiotemporal pattern evolution of PLESs. The results showed that: (1) The distribution of PLESs presented significant differentiation between Urban Built-Up Area (UBUA) and Non-Urban Built-Up Area (NUBUA). UBUA was mainly composed of living spaces, while NUBUA was primarily characterized by production–ecological spaces. (2) The intensive utilization of urban land led to an increase in the area of multifunctional spaces, while the complexity of urban space increased. (3) During 2012 to 2022, the center of gravity of PLESs remained relatively stable. The moving distances were all less than 1 km (except for ecological space from 2012 to 2018). (4) The evolution of PLESs was closely linked with socio-economic factors, and the interactions between the factors also had a significant driving effect on PLESs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Overview of the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Methodological framework of this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Flowchart for the identification of PLESs in UBUAs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Extraction results of UBUAs in Xuzhou City.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Identification results of PLESs in Xuzhou City. (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) The identification results of PLESs for 2012, 2018, and 2022, respectively; (<b>d</b>) Legend of the corresponding figures.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Identification results of PLESs in UBUAs. (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) The identification of PLESs in UBUAs of the central urban districts in 2012, 2018, and 2022; (<b>d</b>) the legend of these figures; (<b>e</b>–<b>j</b>) the identification of PLESs in UBUAs of Jiawang District, Xinyi City, Pizhou City, Pei County, Feng County, and Suining County in 2012, 2018, and 2022, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Center of gravity migration of PLESs in NUBUAs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Overview of the driving factors. (<b>a</b>–<b>h</b>) Overview of the DEM, slope, aspect, GDP, population, precipitation, temperature, and NPP, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Mean q-values in factor detector results for 2012, 2018, and 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Interaction detection results of PLES in 2012, 2018, and 2022. The data marked with green boxes represent two-factor enhancement, while all others indicate non-linear enhancement.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 5393 KiB  
Article
Spatiotemporal Evolution and Driving Mechanisms of Non-Grain Production Rate of Planting Structure in Jilin Province from the Perspective of Grain Security
by Tianqi Tang, Yongzhi Wang, Shibo Wen, Tengrui Yu, Liye Liu and Hongzhi Yang
Land 2025, 14(2), 212; https://doi.org/10.3390/land14020212 - 21 Jan 2025
Viewed by 523
Abstract
Grain security is the foundation of national security, and non-grain production of cultivated land (NGPCL) poses a challenge to grain security. Existing research on the NGPCL has mainly focused on large-scale studies, with relatively few analyses at smaller scales, such as county-level units. [...] Read more.
Grain security is the foundation of national security, and non-grain production of cultivated land (NGPCL) poses a challenge to grain security. Existing research on the NGPCL has mainly focused on large-scale studies, with relatively few analyses at smaller scales, such as county-level units. Therefore, we selected Jilin Province, one of China’s most important grain-producing areas, as the study region. We extracted data on NGPCL from 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2020, and calculated the non-grain production rate of cultivated land for each of the province’s counties. Based on this, we used the gravity center and standard deviation ellipse models, and spatial autocorrelation analysis tools to reveal the spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of the non-grain production rate of the planting structure (NGPRPS) in Jilin Province. Finally, we applied the geographic detector to analyze the impact of 10 factors on the changes in the NGPRPS. The results show that: (1) From 2000 to 2020, the NGPRPS in Jilin Province generally showed a downward trend, which can be divided into three phases: fluctuation, decline, and an initial increase followed by a decrease. (2) There is a clear spatial differentiation in the non-grain production of planting structure (NGPPS) in Jilin Province, with the spatial pattern being generally low in the center and higher at the periphery. In the early stage, the non-grain production rate (NGPR) increased rapidly, while in the later stage, the spatial distribution of NGPPS became more pronounced in the southeastern direction. (3) In the short term, policy factors played a significant role in the changes in the NGPRPS. In the long term, however, natural environment, production resources, economic level, and social development showed interactive effects on the changes in the NGPR in the region. Based on these findings, the government can adopt corresponding measures and management policies considering the impact of these factors, the research results, and the proposed strategies. These include the rational implementation of land use planning, delineating the baseline for cultivated land protection, and controlling the use of cultivated land. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the study area (Jilin province, China).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Change trends of NGPRPS in the study area from 2000 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Migration trajectory of gravity center and standard deviation ellipse of NGPRPS area from 2000 to 2020. The names of counties in the figure refer to the labels in <a href="#land-14-00212-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Spatial distribution of NGPRPS in the study area from 2000 to 2020. The names of cities in the figure refer to the labels in <a href="#land-14-00212-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Moran’s I scatter maps for the NGPRPS in the study area from 2000 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Spatial aggregation types for the NGPPS area from 2000 to 2020. The names of cities and counties in the figure refer to the labels in <a href="#land-14-00212-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Spatial aggregation types for the NGPPS area in four stages. The names of cities and counties in the figure refer to the labels in <a href="#land-14-00212-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Explanatory power (q) of driving factors of NGPRPS from 2000 to 2020. (X1: Urbanization rate; X2: Disposable income ratio of urban and rural residents; X3: Machine-cultivated land area; X4: Grain yield per unit area; X5: Per capita GDP; X6: Slope; X7: Cultivated land production potential; X8: Cultivated land area per capita; X9: Annual precipitation; X10: Rural population).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Results of the interaction of driving factors of NGPRPS 2000–2020, color scale: the value of (q).</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 9785 KiB  
Article
Regional Differences in the Impact of Land Use Pattern on Total Phosphorus Concentration in the Yangtze River Basin
by Fuliang Deng, Wenhui Liu, Wei Liu, Yanxue Xu, Yuanzhuo Sun, Chen Zhang, Mei Sun and Ying Yuan
Land 2025, 14(2), 210; https://doi.org/10.3390/land14020210 - 21 Jan 2025
Viewed by 320
Abstract
Accurately assessing the impact of land use patterns on total phosphorus (TP) concentration in surface water is crucial for protecting the water environment of the Yangtze River Basin (YRB). However, due to the heterogeneity of land use patterns, the regional differences in the [...] Read more.
Accurately assessing the impact of land use patterns on total phosphorus (TP) concentration in surface water is crucial for protecting the water environment of the Yangtze River Basin (YRB). However, due to the heterogeneity of land use patterns, the regional differences in the intensity and direction of their impacts on TP concentrations in the YRB remain insufficiently understood. This study utilizes water quality monitoring data from state-controlled sections in 2021 and employs spatial autocorrelation analysis, geographic detectors, and Pearson correlation models to identify the impacts of land use on TP concentrations at multiple scales across the YRB. The results indicate that TP concentrations at 98.8% of the monitoring stations in the YRB exceed the Class III standard, with high concentrations of TP concentrated in the Pudu River Basin, Chengdu Plain, Jianghan Plain, and Yangtze River Delta regions. At the YRB scale, the spatial pattern of built-up land, cropland, and industrial and mining land significantly increases TP concentrations, while the pattern of forest and grassland areas exert mitigating effects. At the sub-basin scale, the impact of land use patterns on TP concentrations varies regionally. Specifically, TP concentrations in the Pudu River Basin are primarily attributed to the spatial pattern of industrial and mining land, in the Chengdu Plain to the spatial pattern of cropland and industrial and mining land, and in the Jianghan Plain to the spatial pattern of cropland, built-up land, and industrial and mining land. These results provided decision support for TP concentration control strategies and effective mitigation measures. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Overview of the Yangtze River Basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Technical Scheme.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Spatial distribution map of TP concentration in the Yangtze River Basin based on national control cross-sections.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Hotspot analysis and secondary water resource zoning-based TP concentration hot and cold zoning map in the Yangtze River Basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Spatial distribution map of the 6 main land use types in the Yangtze River Basin: (<b>a</b>) forest; (<b>b</b>) grassland; (<b>c</b>) cropland; (<b>d</b>) built-up land; (<b>e</b>) bareland; (<b>f</b>) wetland.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Interaction <span class="html-italic">q</span> value of different land use types and TP concentration in the Yangtze River Basin. Mining land refers to industrial and mining land.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Histogram of land use impact factor (LUIF) of secondary water resources in the Yangtze River Basin. Mining land refers to industrial and mining land. “***” indicates a significance level of <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001, “**” indicates a significance level of <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01, and “*” indicates a significance level of <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Histogram of land use impact factor (LUIF) of land use type in hot and cold zones in the Yangtze River Basin (<b>a</b>–<b>g</b>). Accumulation histogram of land use area proportion and TP concentration curve of the hot and cold zones in the Yangtze River Basin (<b>h</b>). “***” indicates a significance level of <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001, “**” indicates a significance level of <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01, and “*” indicates a significance level of <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05. “+” indicates a positive value of LUIF, and “-“ indicates a negative value of LUIF.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Distribution map of enterprises that need to be rectified in the self-examination of “three phosphorus” in the Yangtze River Basin in 2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The distribution map of the dominant land use types for TP concentration sources in the 12 sub-basins of the Yangtze River.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Box plot of TP concentration in 2021 for secondary water resources in the Yangtze River Basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure A2
<p>Accumulation histogram of land use area proportion and TP concentration curve of secondary water resources in the Yangtze River Basin. ASJR is the above Shigu of the Jinsha River; BSJR is the below Shigu of the Jinsha River; MTR is the Minjiang and Tuojiang Rivers; YTY is the mainstream from Yibin to Yichang; WR is the Wujiang River; JR is the Jialing River; HR is the Han River; YTH is the mainstream from Yichang to Hukou; DTL is the Dongting Lake Water System; PYL is the Poyang Lake Water System; BHMS is the Below Hukou of Main Stream; THL is the Taihu Lake Water System.</p>
Full article ">
36 pages, 25401 KiB  
Article
Analysis of Spatiotemporal Dynamics and Driving Factors of China’s Nationally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems
by Fei Ju, Rui Yang and Chun Yang
Agriculture 2025, 15(2), 221; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15020221 - 20 Jan 2025
Viewed by 531
Abstract
China’s Nationally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (China-NIAHS) are agricultural systems with deep historical and cultural roots that exhibit temporal continuity and spatial heterogeneity in their formation and distribution. As modern and industrialized agriculture have developed, traditional agricultural systems are facing unprecedented challenges and [...] Read more.
China’s Nationally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (China-NIAHS) are agricultural systems with deep historical and cultural roots that exhibit temporal continuity and spatial heterogeneity in their formation and distribution. As modern and industrialized agriculture have developed, traditional agricultural systems are facing unprecedented challenges and pressures. This study investigates the spatiotemporal distribution and influencing factors of 196 China-NIAHS sites, categorized into five categories. Using spatial analysis techniques and Geographical Detectors, this study identifies key natural, socioeconomic, and cultural drivers shaping their distribution. The results reveal a predominantly clustered spatial distribution of China-NIAHS, centered around the Yangtze River Basin, with significant influences from population density, tourism development, and industrialization. Historical analysis highlights a west-to-east and northward migration of agricultural activity, driven by political stability and technological advancements. Further findings indicate that the spatial distribution of China-NIAHS is primarily determined by population density, tourism development, and river network density. Population density plays a pivotal role in heritage preservation, tourism development generates economic benefits and facilitates cultural dissemination, and river network density supports the formation and sustainability of heritage sites. Conversely, urbanization and economic development have limited influence, emphasizing the need to prioritize socioeconomic and natural factors in conservation strategies. This study provides a comprehensive understanding of the spatial and temporal dynamics of China-NIAHS, offering valuable insights for sustainable heritage conservation and the strategic integration of natural and socioeconomic factors into modern agricultural policies. These findings deepen the understanding of China-NIAHS, highlighting their role in ecological and cultural sustainability while supporting value assessment, region-specific protection, and sustainable utilization strategies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Total number of China-NIAHS sites and number of provinces with site distributions in 10 historical periods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Comparison of GIAHS and Chinese agricultural cultural heritage categories and their simplification into 5 categories in this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Analysis framework.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Spatial distribution of map of the 7 batches of China-NIAHS published by the ministry of agriculture and rural affairs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Kernel density distribution map of China-NIAHS sites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Statistics on the number of China-NIAHS and GIAHS in different provinces.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Spatial distribution of sites considering the 5 categories of agricultural systems.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Centroid and direction of the spatial distribution of China-NIAHS sites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Kernel density distribution maps of 4 categories of agricultural system sites: (<b>a</b>) planting system sites; (<b>b</b>) composite ecosystem sites; (<b>c</b>) breeding system sites; (<b>d</b>) agricultural engineering system sites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Spatiotemporal distribution of China-NIAHS sites by Chinese historical periods: (<b>a</b>) spatiotemporal distribution of overall sites; (<b>b</b>) spatiotemporal distribution of planting system sites; (<b>c</b>) spatiotemporal distribution of composite ecosystem sites; (<b>d</b>) spatiotemporal distribution of breeding (including fishing and hunting system sites); (<b>e</b>) spatiotemporal distribution of agricultural engineering system sites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10 Cont.
<p>Spatiotemporal distribution of China-NIAHS sites by Chinese historical periods: (<b>a</b>) spatiotemporal distribution of overall sites; (<b>b</b>) spatiotemporal distribution of planting system sites; (<b>c</b>) spatiotemporal distribution of composite ecosystem sites; (<b>d</b>) spatiotemporal distribution of breeding (including fishing and hunting system sites); (<b>e</b>) spatiotemporal distribution of agricultural engineering system sites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Movement trend of the mean center and distribution direction of China-NIAHS sites in different periods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Voronoi analysis diagram of China-NIAHS sites in different historical stages: (<b>a</b>) first stage; (<b>b</b>) second stage; (<b>c</b>) third stage; (<b>d</b>) fourth stage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Time trend of the number of sites for the 5 categories of agricultural systems in different historical periods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Voronoi analysis diagrams of 3 categories of agricultural system sites in 4 different historical stages: (<b>a</b>) planting system sites; (<b>b</b>) composite ecosystem sites; (<b>c</b>) breeding system sites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Distribution map of China-NIAHS sites with respect to river buffer zones.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Elevation distribution of China-NIAHS sites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Comparison of China-NIAHS sites and socioeconomic development factors across the top 10 provinces: (<b>a</b>) population size; (<b>b</b>) total tourism revenue; (<b>c</b>) industrialization index; (<b>d</b>) road traffic conditions; (<b>e</b>) urbanization; (<b>f</b>) real GDP per capita.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17 Cont.
<p>Comparison of China-NIAHS sites and socioeconomic development factors across the top 10 provinces: (<b>a</b>) population size; (<b>b</b>) total tourism revenue; (<b>c</b>) industrialization index; (<b>d</b>) road traffic conditions; (<b>e</b>) urbanization; (<b>f</b>) real GDP per capita.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Interactive effects of pairwise factors on the spatial distribution changes of China-NIAHS sites.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 4891 KiB  
Article
Monitoring Forest Disturbances and Associated Driving Forces in Guangdong Province Using Long-Term Landsat Time Series Images
by Lin Qiu, Zhongbing Chang, Xiaomei Luo, Songjia Chen, Jun Jiang and Li Lei
Forests 2025, 16(1), 189; https://doi.org/10.3390/f16010189 - 20 Jan 2025
Viewed by 618
Abstract
Research on monitoring forest disturbances and analyzing its driving factors is crucial for the sustainable management of forest ecosystems. To quantitatively identify the spatial distribution and dynamic changes of forest disturbance and its driving factors in Guangdong Province from 1990 to 2019, the [...] Read more.
Research on monitoring forest disturbances and analyzing its driving factors is crucial for the sustainable management of forest ecosystems. To quantitatively identify the spatial distribution and dynamic changes of forest disturbance and its driving factors in Guangdong Province from 1990 to 2019, the long-term Landsat time series imagery and the LandTrendr change detection algorithm were utilized. The impact of forest disturbances on four types of landscape fragmentation (attrition, perforation, shrinkage, and subdivision) was analyzed using the Forman index. The Geodetector model was used to analyze the driving factors of forest disturbance from human activity and the natural environment. The results showed that the LandTrendr algorithm achieved a Kappa coefficient of 0.79, with an overall accuracy of approximately 82.59%. The findings indicate a consistent increase in shrinkage patches, both in quantity and area. Spatially, the centroids of forest fragmentation processes exhibited a clear inland migration trend, reflecting the growing ecological pressures faced by inland forest ecosystems. Furthermore, interactions among driving factors, particularly between population density and economic factors, significantly amplified their combined impacts. The correlation between forest disturbances and socio-economic factors revealed distinct regional variations, highlighting significant differences in forest disturbance dynamics across cities with varying levels of economic development. This study provides critical insights into the spatiotemporal dynamics of forest disturbances under rapid urbanization and economic development. It lays the groundwork for sustainable forest management strategies in Guangdong Province and may contribute to global discussions on managing forest ecosystems during periods of rapid socio-economic transformation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Urban Forestry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the study area and spatial distribution of forests from GlobeLand30 (2020).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Research technology roadmap.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Construction process of forest subdivision process model (The red square is an example of an eight-neighborhood).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Disturbance results for three typical areas ((<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) were three representative areas).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Result of centroid analysis in the spatial process of forest subdivision.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Correlation coefficients between the area of forest disturbance and various factors.</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 11115 KiB  
Article
Monitoring of Land Subsidence and Analysis of Impact Factors in the Tianshan North Slope Urban Agglomeration
by Xiaoqiang Yi, Lang Wang, Hui Ci, Ran Wang, Hui Yang and Zhaojin Yan
Land 2025, 14(1), 202; https://doi.org/10.3390/land14010202 - 20 Jan 2025
Viewed by 458
Abstract
As one of the 19 key regions for comprehensive land development in China, the Tianshan North Slope urban agglomeration is significant for China’s urban development when calculating the land subsidence and analyzing the impact factors. This study focused on eight cities in the [...] Read more.
As one of the 19 key regions for comprehensive land development in China, the Tianshan North Slope urban agglomeration is significant for China’s urban development when calculating the land subsidence and analyzing the impact factors. This study focused on eight cities in the Tianshan North Slope urban agglomeration, calculating the land subsidence rate from 18 January 2018 to 12 April 2023 using Sentinel-1A data and analyzing the spatiotemporal patterns and impact factors of land subsidence. The results showed that (1) the average land subsidence rate is mainly distributed between −30 and 10 mm/a, and the maximum subsidence rate can reach −358 mm/a. Land uplift mainly occurs in Hutubi County and Manas County. (2) From the transition matrix, landscape pattern index, and Moran’s I, the spatiotemporal patterns of the land subsidence rate are obvious, with a spatial positive correlation. During the monitoring period, each administration experienced varying degrees of land subsidence or uplift processes. (3) Using GeoDetector to perform quantitative analyses, it was found that the hydrological environment is significant to land subsidence, and human activities, such as road network density and nighttime lighting, contribute the least to land subsidence, suggesting that it is related to the arid climate of the study area. This paper aims to provide theoretical support for the stable development of and production activities in the study area. This approach not only offers technical support but also provides guidance for evaluating, monitoring, and the early warning of land subsidence in the region. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study area: (<b>a</b>) the location of TSNSUA; (<b>b</b>) TSNSUA consisting of 8 cities.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>SAR image coverage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Study process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>SBAS-InSAR partial image time baseline connection diagram. The lines represents the connection between the super master image and the slave image; the numbers represents the relative position relationship between images in different periods; the yellow dots represents the super master image, which is selected as the reference image in the processing process; the green dots represents the slave image, which is paired with the super master image or other images.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Land subsidence rate using SBAS-InSAR.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Subsidence levels of various administrative divisions in 2020. (<b>a</b>) Urumqi City; (<b>b</b>) Changji City; (<b>c</b>) Shihezi City; (<b>d</b>) Wujiaqu City; (<b>e</b>) Fukang City; (<b>f</b>) Shawan City; (<b>g</b>) Manas County; (<b>h</b>) Hutubi County.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The boundary of each region. The numbers represent the area of each region in square kilometers.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Transfer matrix of land subsidence at the scale of each administrative region. (<b>a</b>) Urumqi City; (<b>b</b>) Changji City; (<b>c</b>) Shihezi City; (<b>d</b>) Wujiaqu City; (<b>e</b>) Fukang City; (<b>f</b>) Shawan City; (<b>g</b>) Manas County; (<b>h</b>) Hutubi County.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The contribution of impact factor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The result of factor interaction detection.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The box plot of epicenter deformation rates.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 3856 KiB  
Article
Spatial Analysis of Network Attention on Tourism Resources for Sustainable Tourism Development in Western Hunan, China: A Multi-Source Data Approach
by Huizi Zeng, Chengjun Tang, Chen Zhou and Peng Zhou
Sustainability 2025, 17(2), 744; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17020744 - 18 Jan 2025
Viewed by 454
Abstract
Understanding the tourism resource network attention is crucial for promoting sustainable tourism development. This study utilized multi-source data to assess tourism resource network attention in Western Hunan, with GIS spatial analysis and the Geodetector method applied to identify spatial patterns and influencing factors. [...] Read more.
Understanding the tourism resource network attention is crucial for promoting sustainable tourism development. This study utilized multi-source data to assess tourism resource network attention in Western Hunan, with GIS spatial analysis and the Geodetector method applied to identify spatial patterns and influencing factors. The results indicate a distinct “dual-core” spatial clustering in network attention, with natural landscape resources centralized in Zhangjiajie and cultural landscape resources in Xiangxi Prefecture. Recreational tourism resources exhibit a similar clustering pattern around these primary and secondary centers. The factors and intensities influencing network attention differ by tourism resource type. For overall tourism resources, natural landscapes, and cultural landscapes, tourist attractions rating (X11) and attraction clustering degree (X12) are the primary drivers, with the strongest impact on natural landscapes (q = 0.648, 0.373), followed by overall resources (q = 0.361, 0.216) and cultural landscapes (q = 0.311, 0.206). In contrast, recreational resources are most influenced by nearby attractions and tourism service capacity (q(X12) = 0.743, q(X15) = 0.620), alongside notable effects from regional factors related to economic development, industrial structure, and tourism development (X1–X9). The interaction between inherent tourism resource characteristics (X10–X15) and regional environmental factors (X1–X9) enhances the driving effect on tourism resource network attention. These findings inform differentiated, resource-specific tourism planning strategies for sustainable development in Western Hunan, promoting balanced regional growth and optimized resource management through a data-driven approach. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Leisure Involvement and Smart Sustainable Tourism)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Location of the study area and points of tourism resources.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Box plot of tourism resource network attention in Western Hunan.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Ranking and scoring of the top five tourism resources in Western Hunan.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Kernel density analysis of network attention in Western Hunan.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Analysis of localized spatial autocorrelation in Western Hunan.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Interaction Effects of Influencing Factors on Tourism Resource Network Attention. Note: <sup>+</sup> indicates Enhance, bi-: q(X1⋂X2) &gt; Max[q(X1),q(X2)], <sup>×</sup> indicates Enhance, nonlinear: q(X1⋂X2) &gt; q(X1) + q(X2).</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop