[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (6)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = GRACE equivalent water thickness

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 3765 KiB  
Article
Integrating Satellite Observations and Hydrological Models to Unravel Large TROPOMI Methane Emissions in South Sudan Wetlands
by Yousef A. Y. Albuhaisi, Ype van der Velde, Sudhanshu Pandey and Sander Houweling
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(24), 4744; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16244744 - 19 Dec 2024
Viewed by 216
Abstract
This study presents a comprehensive investigation of Methane (CH4) emissions in the wetlands of South Sudan, employing an integrated approach that combines TROPOMI satellite data, river altimetry, and hydrological model outputs. TROPOMI data show a strong increase in CH4 concentrations [...] Read more.
This study presents a comprehensive investigation of Methane (CH4) emissions in the wetlands of South Sudan, employing an integrated approach that combines TROPOMI satellite data, river altimetry, and hydrological model outputs. TROPOMI data show a strong increase in CH4 concentrations over the Sudd wetlands from 2018 to 2022. We quantify CH4 emissions using these data. We find a twofold emission increase from 2018 to 2019 (9.2 ± 2.4 Tg yr−1) to 2020 to 2022 (16.3 ± 3.3 Tg yr−1). River altimetry data analysis elucidates the interconnected dynamics of river systems and CH4 emissions. We identify correlations and temporal alignments across South Sudan wetlands catchments. Our findings indicate a clear signature of ENSO driving the wetland dynamics and CH4 emissions in the Sudd by altering precipitation patterns, hydrology, and temperature, leading to variations in anaerobic conditions conducive to CH4 production. Significant correlations are found between CH4 emissions and PCR-GLOBWB-simulated soil moisture dynamics, groundwater recharge, and surface water parameters within specific catchments, underscoring the importance of these parameters on the catchment scale. Lagged correlations were found between hydrological parameters and CH4 emissions, particularly with PCR-GLOBWB-simulated capillary rise. These correlations shed light on the temporal dynamics of this poorly studied and quantified source of CH4. Our findings contribute to the current knowledge of wetland CH4 emissions and highlight the urgency of addressing the complex interplay between hydrology and carbon dynamics in these ecosystems that play a critical role in the global CH4 budget. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Remote Sensing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) South Sudan study region. Data layers from Stamen Terrain-USA/OSM and OpenStreetMap Humanitarian Data Model. (<b>b</b>) South Sudan river streams within South Sudan borders. The red dots are Hydroweb river altimetry measurement points used in the study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The TROPOMI XCH<sub>4</sub> annual average enhancement over the South Sudan Wetlands Region (SSWR) from 2018 to 2022 at 0.1° × 0.1° resolution. The SSWR, indicated by the black rectangle (latitude 5–10° N and longitude 28–34.5° E), encompasses the area of interest.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Monthly CH<sub>4</sub> emissions for the South Sudan Wetlands Region (SSWR) derived from TROPOMI data from 2018 to 2022. The Y-axis represents CH<sub>4</sub> emissions anomalies in Tg CH<sub>4</sub>. The anomalies in CH<sub>4</sub> emissions are calculated as the deviation from the multi-year monthly mean, standardized by dividing the difference by the standard deviation (SD) of the observed values for that particular month across all years. Positive values indicate higher-than-average emissions, while negative values represent lower-than-average emissions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The TROPOMI-inferred CH<sub>4</sub> enhancements (black), river altimetry (pink), GRACE equivalent water thickness (green), and ENSO index (blue and red) for the South Sudan Wetland Region (SSWR) highlighting the interconnected dynamics. The anomalies in CH<sub>4</sub> emissions are calculated as the deviation from the multi-year monthly mean, standardized by dividing the difference by the standard deviation (SD) of the observed values for that particular month across all years. Positive values indicate higher-than-average emissions, while negative values represent lower-than-average emissions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) South Sudan Wetlands Region (SSWR) catchments, and (<b>b</b>) TROPOMI CH<sub>4</sub> emission in comparison to river altimetry measurements per catchment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Correlation between PCR-GLOBWB sub-surface parameters anomalies and TROPOMI CH₄ emission anomalies.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Correlation between PCR-GLOBWB surface parameters anomalies and TROPOMI CH₄ emission anomalies.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Correlation between PCR-GLOBWB river parameters anomalies and TROPOMI CH₄ emission anomalies.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparison of normalized TROPOMI CH₄ emissions from the SSWR (black) alongside normalized water levels of Lake Victoria (green). The bars indicate the phases of the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO), with El Niño events represented in blue and La Niña events in red, highlighting potential correlations between climatic phenomena and CH₄ emissions.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 14007 KiB  
Article
Influence of Land Use and Land Cover Changes and Precipitation Patterns on Groundwater Storage in the Mississippi River Watershed: Insights from GRACE Satellite Data
by Padmanava Dash, Sushant Shekhar, Varun Paul and Gary Feng
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(22), 4285; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16224285 - 17 Nov 2024
Viewed by 659
Abstract
Growing human demands are placing significant pressure on groundwater resources, causing declines in many regions. Identifying areas where groundwater levels are declining due to human activities is essential for effective resource management. This study investigates the influence of land use and land cover, [...] Read more.
Growing human demands are placing significant pressure on groundwater resources, causing declines in many regions. Identifying areas where groundwater levels are declining due to human activities is essential for effective resource management. This study investigates the influence of land use and land cover, crop types, and precipitation patterns on groundwater level trends across the Mississippi River Watershed (MRW), USA. Groundwater storage changes from 2003 to 2015 were estimated using data from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite mission. A spatiotemporal analysis was conducted at four scales: the entire MRW, groundwater regimes based on groundwater level change rates, 31 states within the MRW, and six USGS hydrologic unit code (HUC)-2 watersheds. The results indicate that the Lower Mississippi region experienced the fastest groundwater decline, with a Sen’s slope of −0.07 cm/year for the mean equivalent water thickness, which was attributed to intensive groundwater-based soybean farming. By comparing groundwater levels with changes in land use, crop types, and precipitation, trends driven by human activities were identified. This work underscores the ongoing relevance of GRACE data and the GRACE Follow-On mission, launched in 2018, which continues to provide vital data for monitoring groundwater storage. These insights are critical for managing groundwater resources and mitigating human impacts on the environment. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The Mississippi River Watershed with its land use and land cover in 2015.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>A flowchart of the methodology used.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Groundwater regimes in the Mississippi River Watershed, showing Region 1 with a positive rate of groundwater change, Region 2 with a stable (constant) rate, and Region 3 with a negative rate of groundwater change.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Groundwater and LULC trends in the entire Mississippi River Watershed. (<b>a</b>) agriculture, (<b>b</b>) forests, (<b>c</b>) rangeland, and (<b>d</b>) urban areas.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Groundwater trends in (<b>a</b>) Iowa (highest coverage of agriculture), (<b>b</b>) West Virginia (highest coverage of forests), (<b>c</b>) Wyoming (highest coverage of rangelands), and (<b>d</b>) Ohio (highest coverage of urban areas).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Groundwater trends in the following HUC-2 watersheds: (<b>a</b>) Upper Mississippi (highest coverage of agriculture), (<b>b</b>) Tennessee (highest coverage of forests), (<b>c</b>) Missouri (highest coverage of rangeland), and (<b>d</b>) Ohio (highest coverage of urban areas).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Groundwater trends in the three groundwater regimes of watersheds. (<b>a</b>) Region 1 with a small positive rate of change in groundwater levels, (<b>b</b>) Region 2 with an almost constant rate of change in groundwater levels, and (<b>c</b>) Region 3 with a high negative rate of change in groundwater levels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7 Cont.
<p>Groundwater trends in the three groundwater regimes of watersheds. (<b>a</b>) Region 1 with a small positive rate of change in groundwater levels, (<b>b</b>) Region 2 with an almost constant rate of change in groundwater levels, and (<b>c</b>) Region 3 with a high negative rate of change in groundwater levels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Groundwater trends in (<b>a</b>) the state with fastest groundwater change (Mississippi), (<b>b</b>) the state with slowest groundwater change (Kentucky), (<b>c</b>) the HUC-2 watershed with the fastest groundwater change (Lower Mississippi), and (<b>d</b>) the HUC-2 watershed with the slowest groundwater change (Ohio River).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>LULC trends in the groundwater regimes. (<b>a</b>) Region 1 with a slightly positive rate of groundwater change, (<b>b</b>) Region 2 with an almost constant rate of change in groundwater levels, and (<b>c</b>) Region 3 with a significantly negative rate of groundwater change.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9 Cont.
<p>LULC trends in the groundwater regimes. (<b>a</b>) Region 1 with a slightly positive rate of groundwater change, (<b>b</b>) Region 2 with an almost constant rate of change in groundwater levels, and (<b>c</b>) Region 3 with a significantly negative rate of groundwater change.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>LULC trends in (<b>a</b>) the state with the fastest groundwater change (Mississippi), (<b>b</b>) the state with the slowest groundwater change (Kentucky), (<b>c</b>) the state with the lowest groundwater per pixel (Mississippi), (<b>d</b>) the state with the highest groundwater per pixel (South Dakota), (<b>e</b>) the HUC-2 watershed with the fastest groundwater change (Lower Mississippi), (<b>f</b>) the HUC-2 watershed with the slowest groundwater change (Ohio), (<b>g</b>) the HUC-2 watershed with the lowest groundwater per pixel (Lower Mississippi), and (<b>h</b>) the HUC-2 watershed with the highest groundwater per pixel (Missouri).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10 Cont.
<p>LULC trends in (<b>a</b>) the state with the fastest groundwater change (Mississippi), (<b>b</b>) the state with the slowest groundwater change (Kentucky), (<b>c</b>) the state with the lowest groundwater per pixel (Mississippi), (<b>d</b>) the state with the highest groundwater per pixel (South Dakota), (<b>e</b>) the HUC-2 watershed with the fastest groundwater change (Lower Mississippi), (<b>f</b>) the HUC-2 watershed with the slowest groundwater change (Ohio), (<b>g</b>) the HUC-2 watershed with the lowest groundwater per pixel (Lower Mississippi), and (<b>h</b>) the HUC-2 watershed with the highest groundwater per pixel (Missouri).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Precipitation trends in the groundwater regimes: (<b>a</b>) Region 1 exhibiting a slightly positive rate of groundwater level change and (<b>b</b>) Region 3 showing a pronounced declining trend in groundwater levels. No significant trends were observed in precipitation for these; however, seasonality is present in the precipitation time series.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Precipitation trends in (<b>a</b>) Iowa (highest coverage of agriculture), (<b>b</b>) West Virginia (highest coverage of forests), (<b>c</b>) Wyoming (highest coverage of rangeland), (<b>d</b>) Ohio (highest coverage of urban areas), (<b>e</b>) Upper Mississippi watershed (highest coverage of agriculture), (<b>f</b>) Tennessee River watershed (highest coverage of forests), (<b>g</b>) Missouri River watershed (highest coverage of rangeland), and (<b>h</b>) Ohio River watershed (highest coverage of urban areas).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12 Cont.
<p>Precipitation trends in (<b>a</b>) Iowa (highest coverage of agriculture), (<b>b</b>) West Virginia (highest coverage of forests), (<b>c</b>) Wyoming (highest coverage of rangeland), (<b>d</b>) Ohio (highest coverage of urban areas), (<b>e</b>) Upper Mississippi watershed (highest coverage of agriculture), (<b>f</b>) Tennessee River watershed (highest coverage of forests), (<b>g</b>) Missouri River watershed (highest coverage of rangeland), and (<b>h</b>) Ohio River watershed (highest coverage of urban areas).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Distribution of top 10 crops in entire Mississippi River Watershed in 2015.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Trends of top five crops in entire Mississippi River Watershed from 2010 to 2015.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Crop trends in major agricultural states in Mississippi River Watershed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Crop trends in HUC-2 watersheds where agriculture is the major land use and land cover class.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16 Cont.
<p>Crop trends in HUC-2 watersheds where agriculture is the major land use and land cover class.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Validation of groundwater trends from well data for (<b>a</b>) Arkansas, (<b>b</b>) Indiana, (<b>c</b>) Iowa, (<b>d</b>) Louisiana, (<b>e</b>) Mississippi, and (<b>f</b>) Missouri.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17 Cont.
<p>Validation of groundwater trends from well data for (<b>a</b>) Arkansas, (<b>b</b>) Indiana, (<b>c</b>) Iowa, (<b>d</b>) Louisiana, (<b>e</b>) Mississippi, and (<b>f</b>) Missouri.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Validation of groundwater trends from well data for the following HUC-2 watersheds: (<b>a</b>) Lower Mississippi watershed, (<b>b</b>) Missouri watershed, (<b>c</b>) Ohio watershed, and (<b>d</b>) Upper Mississippi watershed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18 Cont.
<p>Validation of groundwater trends from well data for the following HUC-2 watersheds: (<b>a</b>) Lower Mississippi watershed, (<b>b</b>) Missouri watershed, (<b>c</b>) Ohio watershed, and (<b>d</b>) Upper Mississippi watershed.</p>
Full article ">
28 pages, 10255 KiB  
Article
Understanding Changes in the Hydrometeorological Conditions towards Climate-Resilient Agricultural Interventions in Ethiopia
by Satiprasad Sahoo and Ajit Govind
Agronomy 2023, 13(2), 387; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13020387 - 28 Jan 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2435
Abstract
Climate resilient agriculture (CRA) is very important to achieve long-term improvement in productivity and farm incomes under climate uncertainty. The present study focuses on investigating the plausible changes in the hydrometeorological conditions using big-data analysis techniques in the study of Ethiopia. The original [...] Read more.
Climate resilient agriculture (CRA) is very important to achieve long-term improvement in productivity and farm incomes under climate uncertainty. The present study focuses on investigating the plausible changes in the hydrometeorological conditions using big-data analysis techniques in the study of Ethiopia. The original contribution of this work envisages the importance of the CRA system in water-scarce areas for sustainable agriculture planning and management under changing climatic conditions. In the present research, a TerraClimate model was the basis for weather (precipitation and temperature) and hydrological data (runoff, actual evapotranspiration, potential evapotranspiration, vapor pressure deficit and climate water deficit); these data were used to determine the spatial distribution of the standardized anomaly index (SAI) and the slope of the linear regression for long-term (1958–2020) trend analysis. Future climate trend analysis (2021–2100) has been performed through the CMIP6 (EC-Earth3) shared socio-economic pathway (SSP 2) 4.5 dataset. Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) with CSR and JPL data were utilized for the generation of water storage heat maps from 2002 to 2021. The results show that the average annual rainfall data for over 62 years was found to be 778.42 mm and the standard deviation is 81.53 mm. The results also show that the western part of the study area has the highest temperature trend, which diminishes as one moves eastward; the minimum temperature trend has been found in the western part of the study area. It was found that the equivalent water thickness (EWT) range of both CSR and JPL products was −15 to 40 cm. These results can help local climate-resilient development planning and enhance coordination with other institutions to access and manage climate finance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Transforming AgriFood Systems under a Changing Climate)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Ethiopia Map.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Overall methodological framework.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Spatial distribution of the precipitation, maximum and minimum temperature trend (slope of the linear regression) map for 1958–2020 in the study of Ethiopia.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Standardized precipitation anomaly index maps for 1960, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000, 2010, and 2020 in the study of Ethiopia.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4 Cont.
<p>Standardized precipitation anomaly index maps for 1960, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000, 2010, and 2020 in the study of Ethiopia.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Standardized max. temperature anomaly index maps for 1960, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000, 2010, and 2020 in the study of Ethiopia.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5 Cont.
<p>Standardized max. temperature anomaly index maps for 1960, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000, 2010, and 2020 in the study of Ethiopia.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Standardized min. temperature anomaly index maps for 1960, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000, 2010, and 2020 in the study of Ethiopia.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6 Cont.
<p>Standardized min. temperature anomaly index maps for 1960, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000, 2010, and 2020 in the study of Ethiopia.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Spatial distribution of the future precipitation, maximum and minimum temperature trend (slope of the linear regression) map for 2021–2100 in the study of Ethiopia.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Spatial distribution of the AET, PET, Q, VPD and DEF trend (slope of the linear regression) map for 1958–2020 in the study of Ethiopia.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Monthly equivalent water thickness (EWT) variation from 2002 to 2021 obtained by GRACE [Center for Space Research (CSR) and Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL)] datasets on Ethiopia.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Annual terrestrial water storage (TWS) maps from GLDAS 2 CLM (2015–2021) in Ethiopia.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10 Cont.
<p>Annual terrestrial water storage (TWS) maps from GLDAS 2 CLM (2015–2021) in Ethiopia.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Annual groundwater storage (GWS) maps from GLDAS 2 CLM (2015–2020) in Ethiopia.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Pearson correlation map of 2020 in Ethiopia.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Terrestrial water storage variables importance using Boruta algorithm.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 19177 KiB  
Article
Assessment of Water Resources Availability in Amu Darya River Basin Using GRACE Data
by Obaidullah Salehie, Tarmizi bin Ismail, Shamsuddin Shahid, Mohammed Magdy Hamed, Pennan Chinnasamy and Xiaojun Wang
Water 2022, 14(4), 533; https://doi.org/10.3390/w14040533 - 11 Feb 2022
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 6509
Abstract
Water is diminishing in many places of the globe due to human intervention and climate variability. This study was conducted to assess water sustainability in the Amu Darya basin, the largest river catchment of central Asia, using two Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment [...] Read more.
Water is diminishing in many places of the globe due to human intervention and climate variability. This study was conducted to assess water sustainability in the Amu Darya basin, the largest river catchment of central Asia, using two Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite solutions with a spatial resolution of 0.5°. Spatial variability of water sustainability was estimated by integrating reliability, resiliency and vulnerability. In addition, the Modified Mann–Kendall (MMK) test was utilized to detect the significant trends in water availability. Findings show a significant decline in the basin’s water supply, especially after 2010. Water availability was more variable in the east and a small area in the south. Trend analysis revealed higher declination in water availability in the range of −0.04 to −0.08 cm/year in the tundra and warm dry continental climate zones and the delta region of the basin ending in the Aral Sea in the cold desert climate zone. Water resources in the cold semi-arid (steppe) and most parts of the cold desert climate are more sustainable than the rest of the basin. Overall, the results indicate that water resources availability in a large-scale basin with climate diversity could be well assessed using the method used in this study. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Water Resources Management, Policy and Governance)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The climate zones of the Amu Darya river basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The monthly mean anomaly of EWT in (cm) at the five climate zones (rows) of the study area, obtained by CSR and JPL datasets (columns). Row (<b>a</b>) cold desert, (<b>b</b>) cold semi-arid (steppe), (<b>c</b>) hot-summer Mediterranean, (<b>d</b>) warm dry summer continental and (<b>e</b>) tundra.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Variability of EWT (cm) in the basin for two GRACE products: (<b>a</b>) CSR and (<b>b</b>) JPL.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The spatial patterns of change in EWT (cm/year) for (<b>a</b>) CSR and (<b>b</b>) JPL. The color ramps show the rate of change obtained by applying Sen’s slop, and the black dot inside each cell specifies the trend is significant at a 95% confidence interval obtained by MMK.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The spatial pattern of equivalent water thickness reliability, resiliency, vulnerability and sustainability (rows) using CSR and JPL GRACE solutions (columns).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Land use and land cover change over the study area for 2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) Population density (person/km2) in 2020; (<b>b</b>) rate of change in population density during 2000–2020.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 15681 KiB  
Article
The Use of National CORS Networks for Determining Temporal Mass Variations within the Earth’s System and for Improving GRACE/GRACE-FO Solutions
by Walyeldeen Godah, Jagat Dwipendra Ray, Malgorzata Szelachowska and Jan Krynski
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(20), 3359; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12203359 - 15 Oct 2020
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3149
Abstract
Temporal mass variations within the Earth’s system can be detected on a regional/global scale using GRACE (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment) and GRACE Follow-On (GRACE-FO) satellite missions’ data, while GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) data can be used to detect those variations on [...] Read more.
Temporal mass variations within the Earth’s system can be detected on a regional/global scale using GRACE (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment) and GRACE Follow-On (GRACE-FO) satellite missions’ data, while GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) data can be used to detect those variations on a local scale. The aim of this study is to investigate the usefulness of national GNSS CORS (Continuously Operating Reference Stations) networks for the determination of those temporal mass variations and for improving GRACE/GRACE-FO solutions. The area of Poland was chosen as a study area. Temporal variations of equivalent water thickness ΔEWT and vertical deformations of the Earth’s surface Δh were determined at the sites of the ASG-EUPOS (Active Geodetic Network of the European Position Determination System) CORS network using GRACE/GRACE-FO-based GGMs and GNSS data. Moreover, combined solutions of ΔEWT were developed by combining ΔEWT obtained from GNSS data with the corresponding ones determined from GRACE satellite mission data. Strong correlations (correlation coefficients ranging from 0.6 to 0.9) between detrended Δh determined from GRACE/GRACE-FO satellite mission data and the corresponding ones from GNSS data were observed at 93% of the GNSS stations investigated. Furthermore, for the determination of temporal mass variations, GNSS data from CORS network stations provide valuable information complementary to GRACE satellite mission data. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Terrestrial Hydrology Using GRACE and GRACE-FO)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Study area and the location of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) stations used.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>General steps of the method implemented to determine combined solutions of Δ<span class="html-italic">EWT</span> and evaluate monthly variations of equivalent water thickness from Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment/GRACE-Follow-On (GRACE/GRACE-FO)-based Global Geopotential Models (GGMs) and GNSS data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Time series of daily and monthly vertical deformations for the KLCE station of the Active Geodetic Network of the European Position Determination System (ASG-EUPOS) network.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Time series of monthly vertical deformations of the Earth’s surface determined from GNSS and GRACE/GRACE-FO satellite missions’ data at the stations of the ASG-EUPOS network.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Linear trends of vertical deformation of the Earth’s surface estimated at ASG-EUPOS sites using GRACE/GRACE-FO satellite missions and GNSS data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Coefficients of correlation between vertical deformations of the Earth’s surface determined from ASG-EUPOS and GRACE/GRACE-FO satellite missions’ data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Standard deviations of the differences between vertical deformations of the Earth’s surface determined from ASG-EUPOS and GRACE/GRACE-FO satellite missions’ data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The ratio between the weights <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>w</mi> <mrow> <mi>GNSS</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>w</mi> <mrow> <mi>GRACE</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> (i.e., <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>w</mi> <mrow> <mi>GNSS</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>:<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>w</mi> <mrow> <mi>GRACE</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Time series of monthly temporal variations of the equivalent water thickness Δ<span class="html-italic">EWT</span> determined from GNSS data Δ<span class="html-italic">EWT</span><sub>m-GNSS</sub>, GRACE satellite mission data Δ<span class="html-italic">EWT</span><sub>m-GRACE</sub> and their combined solutions Δ<span class="html-italic">EWT</span><sub>m-</sub><sub>CombSol</sub> as well as the corresponding Δ<span class="html-italic">EWT</span><sub>m-WGHM</sub> obtained from the WGHM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Coefficients of correlation between Δ<span class="html-italic">EWT</span><sub>m-GNSS</sub> and Δ<span class="html-italic">EWT</span><sub>m-WGHM</sub> (red bar), between Δ<span class="html-italic">EWT</span><sub>m-GRACE</sub> and Δ<span class="html-italic">EWT</span><sub>m-WGHM</sub> (black bar), and between Δ<span class="html-italic">EWT</span><sub>m-</sub><sub>CombSol</sub> and Δ<span class="html-italic">EWT</span><sub>m-WGHM</sub> (cyan bar).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Standard deviations of differences δΔ<span class="html-italic">EWT</span><sub>m-GNSS</sub> (red bar), δΔ<span class="html-italic">EWT</span><sub>m-GRACE</sub> (blue bar) and δΔ<span class="html-italic">EWT</span><sub>m-CombSol</sub> (cyan bar).</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 8496 KiB  
Article
Assessment of Temporal Variations of Orthometric/Normal Heights Induced by Hydrological Mass Variations over Large River Basins Using GRACE Mission Data
by Walyeldeen Godah, Malgorzata Szelachowska, Jan Krynski and Jagat Dwipendra Ray
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(18), 3070; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12183070 - 19 Sep 2020
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3406
Abstract
Almost half of the Earth’s land is covered by large river basins. Temporal variations of hydrological masses induce time-varying gravitational potential and temporal mass loading that deforms the Earth’s surface. These phenomena cause temporal variations of geoid/quasigeoid and ellipsoidal heights that result in [...] Read more.
Almost half of the Earth’s land is covered by large river basins. Temporal variations of hydrological masses induce time-varying gravitational potential and temporal mass loading that deforms the Earth’s surface. These phenomena cause temporal variations of geoid/quasigeoid and ellipsoidal heights that result in temporal variations of orthometric/normal heights ΔHH*. The aim of this research is to assess ΔHH* induced by hydrological masses over large river basins using the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite mission data. The results obtained reveal that for the river basin of a strong hydrological signal, ΔHH* reach 8 cm. These ΔHH* would be needed to reliably determine accurate orthometric/normal heights. The ΔHH* do not exceed ±1 cm in the case of the river basin of the weak hydrological signal. The relation between hydrological mass changes and ΔHH* was investigated. Correlations between ΔHH* and temporal variations of equivalent water thickness were observed in 87% of river basins subareas out of which 45% exhibit strong correlations. The ΔHH* determined over two river basins that characterize with the strongest and weakest temporal variations were analysed using the Principal Component Analysis method. The results obtained reveal that ΔHH* in subareas of the same river basin can significantly differ (e.g., ±2 cm in the Amazon basin) from each other, and are strongly associated with different spatio-temporal patterns of the entire river basin. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Geodesy for Gravity and Height Systems)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>The relation between temporal variations of hydrological masses, temporal variations of geoid/quasigeoid heights and the crustal deformations in the vertical component, (<b>a</b>) Hydrological masses increase on the Earth’s surface, and (<b>b</b>) Hydrological masses decrease on the Earth’s surface.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Map of large river basins investigated: (1) Amazon, (2) Amur, (3) Congo, (4) Danube, (5) Dnieper, (6) Don, (7) Ganges–Brahmaputra, (8) Indus, (9) La Plata, (10) Lake Chad, (11) Lena, (12) Mackenzie, (13) Mississippi–Missouri, (14) Murray–Darling, (15) Niger, (16) Nile, (17) Ob, (18) Orange, (19) Orinoco, (20) Volga, (21) Tigris &amp; Euphrates, (22) Yangtze (Chang Jiang), (23) Yenisei and (24) Zambezi.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Temporal variations for geoid/quasigeoid heights ∆<span class="html-italic">N</span>/∆<span class="html-italic">ζ</span> for twenty four large river basins investigated. Blue dots indicate ∆<span class="html-italic">N</span>/∆<span class="html-italic">ζ</span> values for subareas (i.e., JPL 3° equal-area mascon grid) within the river basin, whilst the red line indicates the mean ∆<span class="html-italic">N</span>/∆<span class="html-italic">ζ</span> over the whole river basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Vertical deformations of the Earth’s surface ∆<span class="html-italic">h</span> for twenty four large river basins investigated. Blue dots indicate ∆<span class="html-italic">h</span> values for subareas (i.e., JPL 3° equal-area mascon grid) within the river basin, whilst the red line indicates the mean ∆<span class="html-italic">h</span> over the whole river basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Phase shift between mean temporal variations of geoid/quasigeoid heights and mean vertical deformations of the Earth’s surface over large basins investigated.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Temporal variations of orthometric/normal heights ∆<span class="html-italic">H</span>/Δ<span class="html-italic">H</span>* for twenty four large river basins investigated. Blue dots indicate ∆<span class="html-italic">H</span>/Δ<span class="html-italic">H</span>* values for subareas (i.e., mascon locations) within the river basin, whilst the red line indicates the average of ∆<span class="html-italic">H</span>/Δ<span class="html-italic">H</span>* over the whole river basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The dispersion (Max-Min) of ∆<span class="html-italic">h</span>, ∆<span class="html-italic">N</span>/∆<span class="html-italic">ζ</span> and ∆<span class="html-italic">H</span>/∆<span class="html-italic">H</span>* over large river basins investigated [mm].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Coefficients of correlations between ∆<span class="html-italic">EWT</span> obtained from the WGHM and ∆<span class="html-italic">H</span>/Δ<span class="html-italic">H</span>* determined using GRACE-based GGMs at subareas (i.e., JPL 3° equal-area mascon grid) of large river basins investigated, (<b>a</b>) Correlation coefficient values, and (<b>b</b>) Histogram of correlation coefficient values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>PCA method results obtained using 75 time series of ∆<span class="html-italic">H</span>/∆<span class="html-italic">H</span>* normalized with their standard deviations over the Amazon basin: (<b>a</b>) Percentage of a total variance of ∆<span class="html-italic">H</span>/∆<span class="html-italic">H</span>* reflected by the first 15. PCs time series, (<b>b</b>) time series of the first, second, third and fourth PCs time series, (<b>c</b>) the first EOF loading pattern, (<b>d</b>) the second EOF loading pattern, (<b>e</b>) the third EOF loading pattern, and (<b>f</b>) the fourth EOF loading pattern.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>PCA method results obtained using 15 time series of ∆<span class="html-italic">H</span>/∆<span class="html-italic">H</span>* normalized with their standard deviations over the Orange basin: (<b>a</b>) percentages of a total variance of ∆<span class="html-italic">H</span>/∆<span class="html-italic">H</span>* reflected by the first 15 PCs time series, (<b>b</b>) time series of the first, second, third and fourth PCs time series, (<b>c</b>) the first EOF loading pattern, (<b>d</b>) the second EOF loading pattern, (<b>e</b>) the third EOF loading pattern, and (<b>f</b>) the fourth EOF loading pattern.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop