[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (57)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = GLOFs

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
20 pages, 10145 KiB  
Article
Monitoring and Disaster Assessment of Glacier Lake Outburst in High Mountains Asian Using Multi-Satellites and HEC-RAS: A Case of Kyagar in 2018
by Long Jiang, Zhiqiang Lin, Zhenbo Zhou, Hongxin Luo, Jiafeng Zheng, Dongsheng Su and Minhong Song
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(23), 4447; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16234447 - 27 Nov 2024
Viewed by 707
Abstract
The glaciers in the High Mountain Asia (HMA) region are highly vulnerable to global warming, posing significant threats to downstream populations and infrastructure through glacier lake outburst floods (GLOFs). The monitoring and early warnings of these events are challenging due to sparse observations [...] Read more.
The glaciers in the High Mountain Asia (HMA) region are highly vulnerable to global warming, posing significant threats to downstream populations and infrastructure through glacier lake outburst floods (GLOFs). The monitoring and early warnings of these events are challenging due to sparse observations in these remote regions. To explore reproducing the evolution of GLOFs with sparse observations in situ, this study focuses on the outburst event and corresponding GLOFs in August 2018 caused by the Kyagar Glacier lake, a typical glacier lake of the HMA in the Karakoram, which is known for its frequent outburst events, using a combination of multi-satellite remote sensing data (Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2) and the HEC-RAS hydrodynamic model. The water depth of the glacier lake and downstream was extracted from satellite data adapted by the Floodwater Depth Elevation Tool (FwDET) as a baseline to compare them with simulations. The elevation-water volume curve was obtained by extrapolation and was applied to calculate the water surface elevation (WSE). The inundation of the downstream of the lake outburst was obtained through flood modeling by incorporating a load elevation-water volume curve and the Digital Elevation Model (DEM) into the hydrodynamic model HEC-RAS. The results showed that the Kyagar glacial lake outburst was rapid and destructive, accompanied by strong currents at the end of each downstream storage ladder. A series of meteorological evaluation indicators showed that HEC-RAS reproduced the medium and low streamflow rates well. This study demonstrated the value of integrating remote sensing and hydrodynamic modeling into GLOF assessments in data-scarce regions, providing insights for disaster risk management and mitigation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Advances in Hydrological Remote Sensing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Kyagar Glacier lake. (<b>a</b>) The location of the lake in the HMA region. The black triangle represents the Kyagar Glacier. The background was made with DEM using the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) and HMA boundary [<a href="#B30-remotesensing-16-04447" class="html-bibr">30</a>]. (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>) Geographic location of the Kyagar Glacier and lake. The image is a false-color composite based on Landsat 8 Level-2 surface reflectance data acquired on 12 July 2018, using bands 5, 4, and 3. The glacier boundary data were from the National Tibetan Plateau/Third Pole Environment Data Center. <a href="https://cstr.cn/18406.11.glacier.001.2013.db" target="_blank">https://cstr.cn/18406.11.glacier.001.2013.db</a> (accessed on 26 October 2024) [<a href="#B31-remotesensing-16-04447" class="html-bibr">31</a>,<a href="#B32-remotesensing-16-04447" class="html-bibr">32</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flowchart of data processing of remote sensing and hydrodynamic modeling process. The satellite parameters information was from Sentinel Online-SentiWiki (<a href="https://sentiwiki.copernicus.eu/web/s1-mission" target="_blank">https://sentiwiki.copernicus.eu/web/s1-mission</a> (accessed on 25 September 2024). S1 and S2 images credits: TAS-I and EADS Astrium.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>This is a cross-section diagram illustrating the principle of the FwDET calculation of flood depth. For example, if the imported water mask has an elevation of 100 m, the tool computes the water depth below each grid cell within that mask. In perennial rivers, the calculated depth tends to be underestimated, as measuring instruments for satellites usually capture the WSE rather than the riverbed, resulting in a reference plane for DEMs at the water surface. The point of (a) and (b) is separately land and waterbody in none flooding time. The actual water depth at point (a) and (b) is 6 m and 15 m, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>FwDET-generated water depth maps for the Kyagar Glacier lake. Background: Sentinel-1 dual-polarization images acquired on 7 August (before outburst) and 12 August (after outburst), 2018. (<b>a</b>) Before the outburst on 7 August 2018 by Sentinel-1. (<b>b</b>) After the outburst on 12 August 2018 by Sentinel-1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Slope filter and iteration setting combinations in FwDET and their respective success rates for computation results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Area percentage of FwDET-derived results under varied parameter combinations, based on Sentinel-2 (11 August) and Sentinel-1 (12 August) data for downstream rivers that were abstracted.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>FwDET-generated water depth maps for the downstream after the Kyagar Glacier lake outburst. Background: True-color composite image of Sentinel-2 satellite data based on B4, B3, and B2 bands. (<b>a</b>) Represents 11 August 2018 by Sentinel-2. (<b>b</b>) Represents 12 August 2018 by Sentinel-1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Elevation-water volume curve for the lake derived via interpolation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Images of glacier lake evolution over time as simulated by HEC-RAS. (<b>a</b>–<b>e</b>) The lake image times on 10 August 2018 at 6:00 a.m., 6:10 a.m., 6:20 a.m., 6:30 a.m., and 6:45 a.m. (<b>f</b>–<b>j</b>) The lake image times on 10 August 2018 at 7:00 a.m., 7:30 a.m., 8:00 a.m., 8:30 a.m., and 9:00 a.m.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Inundation maps for downstream regions of the glacier dam over time, as simulated by HEC-RAS. The inundation diagram from HEC-RAS, which is a union of the maximum inundation depths in each part during modeling. Start-end indicates the longitudinal line of the downstream river taken along the flow direction. (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) The results of the outburst model transform with time and distance along the start-end, while cross1-3 represent the locations where three-dimensional views of water depth change over time at different cross-sections. (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) The variations of water depth along the cross1–3 with time at different points. Each time interval (t1–t8) represents a snapshot within the overall simulation, with t5 (11 August 5:36 a.m.) and t8 (12 August 0:58 a.m.) matching satellite data acquisition times. The average depth represents the average rate of water depth on the crosses.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Model evaluation based on POD, CSI, and FAR metrics across varying average flow rates. S1 represents downstream depth inversions using FwDET based on Sentinel-1 imagery (12 August), while S2 reflects Sentinel-2 data (11 August). We excluded the results where the flow rate was greater than 132 m<sup>3</sup>/s. This is because an overly large average flow rate would exceed the total water capacity of this glacier lake.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 10021 KiB  
Article
Glacial Lake Outburst Flood Susceptibility Mapping in Sikkim: A Comparison of AHP and Fuzzy AHP Models
by Arindam Das, Suraj Kumar Singh, Shruti Kanga, Bhartendu Sajan, Gowhar Meraj and Pankaj Kumar
Climate 2024, 12(11), 173; https://doi.org/10.3390/cli12110173 - 30 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1665
Abstract
The Sikkim region of the Eastern Himalayas is highly susceptible to Glacial Lake Outburst Floods (GLOFs), a risk that has increased significantly due to rapid glacial retreat driven by climate change in recent years. This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of GLOF susceptibility [...] Read more.
The Sikkim region of the Eastern Himalayas is highly susceptible to Glacial Lake Outburst Floods (GLOFs), a risk that has increased significantly due to rapid glacial retreat driven by climate change in recent years. This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of GLOF susceptibility in Sikkim, employing Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) models. Key factors influencing GLOF vulnerability, including lake volume, seismic activity, precipitation, slope, and proximity to rivers, were quantified to develop AHP and FAHP based susceptibility maps. These maps were validated using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves, with the AHP method achieving an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.92 and the FAHP method scoring 0.88, indicating high predictive accuracy for both models. A comparison of the two approaches revealed distinct characteristics, with FAHP providing more granular insights into moderate-risk zones, while AHP offered stronger predictive capability for high-risk areas. Our results indicated that the expansion of glacial lakes, particularly over the past three decades, has heightened the potential for GLOFs, highlighting the urgent need for continuous monitoring and adaptive risk mitigation strategies in the region. This study, in addition to enhancing our understanding of GLOF risks in Sikkim, also provides a robust framework for assessing and managing these risks in other glacial regions worldwide. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Coping with Flooding and Drought)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) An overview map of India showing the geographical location of Sikkim in the northeastern part of the country (highlighted in red). (<b>b</b>) A topographic map of Sikkim, displaying elevation variations across its four districts (North, West, South, and East Sikkim). (<b>c</b>) A detailed map of Sikkim illustrating its river systems (in red), lakes (in blue), glaciers (light blue), and contour lines indicating elevation changes. The map highlights the intricate hydrological features and topography critical to the study of Glacial Lake Outburst Flood (GLOF) susceptibility.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Overall methodology flowchart used in the study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Illustrations of the critical parameters analyzed in this study. (<b>a</b>) Glacial Lake volume (in cubic meters). (<b>b</b>) Glacial Lake Area (in sq.km), categorizing the lakes by size, where larger areas correlate with higher flood potential due to larger water storage. (<b>c</b>) Elevation Map (in meters), highlighting the topographical variance across Sikkim, which affects water flow dynamics and flood pathways. (<b>d</b>) Slope Map (in degrees), illustrating the steepness of the terrain, a key factor in assessing water movement, erosion, and landslide potential. (<b>e</b>) Avalanche Zonation Map, identifying regions at different levels of avalanche risk. (<b>f</b>) Rockfall Zonation Map, which pinpoints areas vulnerable to rockfalls, another factor contributing to the risk of outburst floods. (<b>g</b>) Seismic Activity Map. (<b>h</b>) Distance to River (in meters), indicating proximity to drainage channels. (<b>i</b>) Rainfall Distribution Map (in mm/year), showing areas with high rainfall.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3 Cont.
<p>Illustrations of the critical parameters analyzed in this study. (<b>a</b>) Glacial Lake volume (in cubic meters). (<b>b</b>) Glacial Lake Area (in sq.km), categorizing the lakes by size, where larger areas correlate with higher flood potential due to larger water storage. (<b>c</b>) Elevation Map (in meters), highlighting the topographical variance across Sikkim, which affects water flow dynamics and flood pathways. (<b>d</b>) Slope Map (in degrees), illustrating the steepness of the terrain, a key factor in assessing water movement, erosion, and landslide potential. (<b>e</b>) Avalanche Zonation Map, identifying regions at different levels of avalanche risk. (<b>f</b>) Rockfall Zonation Map, which pinpoints areas vulnerable to rockfalls, another factor contributing to the risk of outburst floods. (<b>g</b>) Seismic Activity Map. (<b>h</b>) Distance to River (in meters), indicating proximity to drainage channels. (<b>i</b>) Rainfall Distribution Map (in mm/year), showing areas with high rainfall.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3 Cont.
<p>Illustrations of the critical parameters analyzed in this study. (<b>a</b>) Glacial Lake volume (in cubic meters). (<b>b</b>) Glacial Lake Area (in sq.km), categorizing the lakes by size, where larger areas correlate with higher flood potential due to larger water storage. (<b>c</b>) Elevation Map (in meters), highlighting the topographical variance across Sikkim, which affects water flow dynamics and flood pathways. (<b>d</b>) Slope Map (in degrees), illustrating the steepness of the terrain, a key factor in assessing water movement, erosion, and landslide potential. (<b>e</b>) Avalanche Zonation Map, identifying regions at different levels of avalanche risk. (<b>f</b>) Rockfall Zonation Map, which pinpoints areas vulnerable to rockfalls, another factor contributing to the risk of outburst floods. (<b>g</b>) Seismic Activity Map. (<b>h</b>) Distance to River (in meters), indicating proximity to drainage channels. (<b>i</b>) Rainfall Distribution Map (in mm/year), showing areas with high rainfall.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>GLOF Susceptibility Maps of the Sikkim region, showing the variation in risk classification based on two different methodologies. (<b>a</b>) Shows the susceptibility map generated using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, and (<b>b</b>) shows the results derived from the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy AHP). The maps classify GLOF risk into five categories: Very Low, Low, Moderate, High, and Very High, depicted by different colors, with areas in red indicating the highest risk of outburst events.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>ROC curves illustrating the AUC values for two different methods used in the study, AHP and FAHP. The AHP method achieved an AUC value of 0.92, indicating high accuracy in GLOF susceptibility prediction, while the FAHP method had an AUC value of 0.88, demonstrating a slightly lower but still reliable predictive performance. The ROC curve plots the true positive rate (sensitivity) against the false positive rate, providing a visual assessment of the model’s performance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Change detection map showing the expansion of high to very high GLOF-susceptible lakes from 1990 to 2023, identified using both the AHP and FAHP methods. The map displays the temporal progression of selected lakes: GL 1, GL 2, GL 3, North Lohnak Lake, South Lohnak Lake, Tso Lhamo, and Khangchung Tso. Different colors represent lake extents at four specific time points, 1990, 2000, 2010, and 2023, with darker shades showing earlier lake boundaries and lighter shades indicating more recent expansions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Line graph illustrating the changes in the area (in sq.km) of selected glacial lakes in Sikkim between 1990 and 2023. The graph tracks the expansion of Gurudongmar 1, Gurudongmar 2, Gurudongmar 3, North Lohnak, South Lohnak, Khangchung Tso, and Tso Lhamo Lake over time. The trends show a general increase in lake areas, indicating progressive glacier melt and lake expansion over the observed period, which correlates with the rising susceptibility to GLOFs.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 8679 KiB  
Article
An Analysis of the Mechanisms Involved in Glacial Lake Outburst Flooding in Nyalam, Southern Tibet, in 2018 Based on Multi-Source Data
by Yixing Zhao, Wenliang Jiang, Qiang Li, Qisong Jiao, Yunfeng Tian, Yongsheng Li, Tongliang Gong, Yanhong Gao and Weishou Zhang
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(15), 2719; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16152719 - 24 Jul 2024
Viewed by 964
Abstract
Glacial Lake Outburst Flood (GLOF) events, particularly prevalent in Asia’s High Mountain regions, pose a significant threat to downstream regions. However, limited understanding of triggering mechanisms and inadequate observations pose significant barriers for early warnings of impending GLOFs. The 2018 Nyalam GLOF event [...] Read more.
Glacial Lake Outburst Flood (GLOF) events, particularly prevalent in Asia’s High Mountain regions, pose a significant threat to downstream regions. However, limited understanding of triggering mechanisms and inadequate observations pose significant barriers for early warnings of impending GLOFs. The 2018 Nyalam GLOF event in southern Tibet offers a valuable opportunity for retrospective analysis. By combining optical and radar remote sensing images, meteorological data, and seismicity catalogs, we examined the spatiotemporal evolution, triggering factors, and the outburst mechanism of this event. Our analysis reveals a progressive retreat of 400–800 m for the parent glaciers between 1991 and 2018, increasing the runoff areas at glacier termini by 167% from 2015 to 2018 and contributing abundant meltwater to the glacial lake. In contrast, the lake size shrunk, potentially due to a weakening moraine dam confirmed by SAR interferometry, which detected continuous subsidence with a maximum line-of-sight (LOS) rate of ~120 mm/a over the preceding ~2.5 years. Additionally, temperature and precipitation in 2018 exceeded the prior decade’s average. Notably, no major earthquakes preceded the event. Based on these observations, we propose a likely joint mechanism involving high temperatures, heavy precipitation, and dam instability. An elevated temperature and precipitation accelerated glacial melt, increasing lake water volume and seepage through the moraine dam. This ultimately compromised dam stability and led to its failure between 3 August 2018 and 6 August 2018. Our findings demonstrate the existence of precursory signs for impending GLOFs. By monitoring the spatiotemporal evolution of environmental factors and deformation, it is possible to evaluate glacial lake risk levels. This work contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of GLOF mechanisms and is of significant importance for future glacial lake risk assessments. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Earth Observation for Emergency Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location plots of the study area. (<b>a</b>) Map around the Tibetan Plateau. (<b>b</b>) Topography of the study area. The red rectangle denotes the Sentienl-1 data coverage. The red pentagram represents the location of the 2018 Nyalam GLOF. The red circles denote historical earthquakes (1930–2018, M &gt; 5.0) around the study area. F1–F3 represent three active faults near the glacial lake. F1: Nam Co–Xuru Couture fault; F2: the South Tibetan Detachment System (STDS); F3: the Main Central Thrust (MCT). (<b>c</b>) Three-dimensional topographic map of the study area. The overlaid imagery is from Google Earth. GL-A and GL-B represent glacial lakes A and B, respectively. G-a, G-b, and G-c represent parent glaciers a, b, and c, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The workflow of this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Schematic diagram of the indicator analysis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Sentinel-1 T121 interferograms for the SBAS-InSAR analysis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>G-b terminus change in the period 1991–2019. The yellow line is the extent of the glacier in 1991; the pink line is the extent of the glacier in each year. Images (<b>1</b>–<b>20</b>) are Landsat 30 m TM/ETM+ images; images (<b>21</b>,<b>22</b>,<b>24</b>,<b>25</b>) are 16 m Gaofen-1 WFV images; and images (<b>23</b>,<b>26</b>,<b>27</b>) are 2 m Gaofen-1 PMS, Gaofen-2 PMS, and Gaofen-6 PMS images, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>G-c terminus change in the period 1991–2019. The yellow line is the extent of the glacier in 1991; the pink line is the extent of the glacier in each year. Images (<b>1</b>–<b>20</b>) are Landsat 30 m TM/ETM+ images; images (<b>21</b>,<b>22</b>,<b>24</b>,<b>25</b>) are 16 m Gaofen-1 WFV images; and images (<b>23</b>,<b>26</b>,<b>27</b>) are 2 m Gaofen-1 PMS, Gaofen-2 PMS, and Gaofen-6 PMS images, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The glacial lake extent change in the period 1991–2019. Images (<b>1</b>–<b>20</b>) use Landsat TM/ETM data with a spatial resolution of 30 m; images (<b>21</b>,<b>22</b>,<b>24</b>,<b>25</b>) use Gaofen-1 WFV data with a spatial resolution of 16 m; images (<b>23</b>,<b>26</b>,<b>27</b>) use Gaofen-1 PMS, Gaofen-2 PMS, and Gaofen-6 PMS data, respectively, with a spatial resolution of 2 m; and image (<b>27</b>) is the aftermath of the GLOF.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Area changes for lakes and glaciers. (<b>a</b>) Extents of GL-A and GL-B lakes; (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>) extents of glacier G-b and G-c, respectively; (<b>d</b>–<b>g</b>) plots of the GL-A area, GL-B area, the distance between GL-A and G-b, and the distance between GL-A and G-c, respectively. The dotted lines represent the trend line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Optical remote sensing image recognition of glacier terminus flow channel. The black rectangles represent the range of the glacier terminus flow channel. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) The optical remote sensing images from different periods before the GLOF event.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Surface deformation monitoring results of the mountains around the glacial lake. (<b>a</b>) The surface deformation monitored as a whole; (<b>b</b>) an enlarged version of (<b>a</b>). P1–P6 are the selected typical deformation areas.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The time-series deformation results of <a href="#remotesensing-16-02719-f010" class="html-fig">Figure 10</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The faults and seismic data for the year prior to the GLOF. The red circles are earthquakes that occurred around the glacier up to one year before the GLOF. The brown and yellow lines are the 2015 Nepal Earthquake Intensity Map from the USGS. The glacial lake is located in the intensity area of the Nepal M8.1 earthquake in 2015.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Meteorological conditions from January to August 2018, measured at the Tingri weather station, compared to the long-term climatology data (1976–2015). The pink columns represent the time points of GLOF occurrences.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13 Cont.
<p>Meteorological conditions from January to August 2018, measured at the Tingri weather station, compared to the long-term climatology data (1976–2015). The pink columns represent the time points of GLOF occurrences.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 10012 KiB  
Article
Retrospective Analysis of Glacial Lake Outburst Flood (GLOF) Using AI Earth InSAR and Optical Images: A Case Study of South Lhonak Lake, Sikkim
by Yang Yu, Bingquan Li, Yongsheng Li and Wenliang Jiang
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(13), 2307; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16132307 - 24 Jun 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2709
Abstract
On 4 October 2023, a glacier lake outburst flood (GLOF) occurred at South Lhonak Lake in the northwest of Sikkim, India, posing a severe threat to downstream lives and property. Given the serious consequences of GLOFs, understanding their triggering factors is urgent. This [...] Read more.
On 4 October 2023, a glacier lake outburst flood (GLOF) occurred at South Lhonak Lake in the northwest of Sikkim, India, posing a severe threat to downstream lives and property. Given the serious consequences of GLOFs, understanding their triggering factors is urgent. This paper conducts a comprehensive analysis of optical imagery and InSAR deformation results to study changes in the surrounding surface of the glacial lake before and after the GLOF event. To expedite the processing of massive InSAR data, an InSAR processing system based on the SBAS-InSAR data processing flow and the AI Earth cloud platform was developed. Sentinel-1 SAR images spanning from January 2021 to March 2024 were used to calculate surface deformation velocity. The evolution of the lake area and surface variations in the landslide area were observed using optical images. The results reveal a significant deformation area within the moraine encircling the lake before the GLOF, aligning with the area where the landslide ultimately occurred. Further research suggests a certain correlation between InSAR deformation results and multiple factors, such as rainfall, lake area, and slope. We speculate that heavy rainfall triggering landslides in the moraine may have contributed to breaching the moraine dam and causing the GLOF. Although the landslide region is relatively stable overall, the presence of a crack in the toparea of landslide raises concerns about potential secondary landslides. Our study may improve GLOF risk assessment and management, thereby mitigating or preventing their hazards. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Remote Sensing for Land Subsidence Monitoring)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Geographical location of South Lhonak Lake and digital elevation model (DEM) of this area. The rectangle marked with the track number indicates the coverage area of the ascending and descending SAR images. The region outlined by the blue rectangle is the primary research area of this paper.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Main workflow of InSAR surface deformation analysis tool based on the cloud platform.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The primary workflow of GPU-assisted full-resolution InSAR fast time-series analysis. The figure is adapted from Duan et al. [<a href="#B19-remotesensing-16-02307" class="html-bibr">19</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Spatial and temporal baseline configuration of Sentinel-1 datasets. (<b>a</b>) Ascending (Track 12) images prior to the disaster; (<b>b</b>) descending (Track 48) images prior to the disaster; (<b>c</b>) descending (Track 48) images after the disaster.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The average LOS deformation rate of the surface surrounding South Lhonak Lake before the disaster. The dashed red line delineates the landslide area, and points P1–P4 were selected for further analysis of the time-series deformation within this area before the GLOF. (<b>a</b>) Derived from ascending (Track 12) images. (<b>b</b>) Derived from descending (Track 48) images.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Time-series deformation of selected points (P1–P4) before the disaster. (<b>a</b>) Ascending (Track 12); (<b>b</b>) descending (Track 48). There is no deformation point near P4 in the deformation results obtained from the descending images.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>GF-2 images of South Lhonak Lake and its surroundings. (<b>a</b>) Prior to the GLOF; (<b>b</b>) after the GLOF.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Further enlarged GF-2 images focused on the landslide area. (<b>a</b>) Prior to the landslide; (<b>b</b>) after the landslide.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The monthly average rainfall of North Sikkim from 2018 to 2022 and five-year average rainfall.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Landsat optical images covering the South Lhonak Lake region from January 2021 to October 2023. The red dashed line delineates the extent of the landslide and floating debris, based on GF-2 image.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The correlation between the time-series deformation of point P1 derived from the descending images of Sentinel-1 before the disaster and the variation in the area of South Lhonak Lake from January 2021 to July 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Slope map of the study area calculated by NASADEM HGT v001, where the dashed blue line represents the pre-disaster lake contour outlined using Landsat 8 images acquired on 25 June 2023, and the solid red line delineates the extent of the landslide.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>The LOS average deformation rate around South Lhonak Lake after the GLOF was calculated using the Sentinel-1 SLC data from October 2023 to March 2024 from the descending track. The yellow line delineates the landslide area, and points P5–P10 were selected for further analysis of the time-series deformation within this area after the GLOF.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Time-series deformation of selected points obtained from descending images after the GLOF. (<b>a</b>) P5–P7; (<b>b</b>) P8–P10.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 2325 KiB  
Article
The Impact of Climate Change on Glacial Lake Outburst Floods
by Jiajia Gao, Jun Du, Yuxuan Bai, Tao Chen and Yixi Zhuoma
Water 2024, 16(12), 1742; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16121742 - 20 Jun 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2113
Abstract
Glacial lake outburst floods (GLOF) hazards in alpine areas are increasing. The effects of climate change on GLOF hazards are unclear. This study examined 37 glacial lakes and climate data from 15 meteorological stations and explored the correlation between climate variations at different [...] Read more.
Glacial lake outburst floods (GLOF) hazards in alpine areas are increasing. The effects of climate change on GLOF hazards are unclear. This study examined 37 glacial lakes and climate data from 15 meteorological stations and explored the correlation between climate variations at different temporal scales. The results indicate that 19 GLOFs hazards occurred in El Niño (warm) years, 8 GLOFs hazards occurred in La Niña (cold) years, 3 GLOFs hazards occurred in cold/warm or warm/cold transition years, and 7 GLOFs hazards occurred in normal years. The higher the fluctuations, the higher the probability of GLOF hazards. Climatic conditions can be divided into three categories: extreme temperature and precipitation, as represented by the Guangxie Co GLOF; extreme precipitation, as represented by the Poge Co GLOF; and extreme temperature, as represented by the Tsho Ga GLOF. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Temporal frequency of GLOFs in El Niño and La Niña events in TP.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Correlation between annual temperature and extreme temperature and accumulated temperature before a glacial lake outburst. ((<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>): represent the correlation between the annual average temperature, extreme temperature, and accumulated temperature before the glacial lake outburst in Guangxie Co; (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>): represent the correlation between the average annual temperature, extreme temperature, and accumulated temperature before the glacial lake outburst in Tsho Ga).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Three categories of extreme climate in GLOF years (red dots represents the composite index).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Three categories of climate conditions in outburst months (red dots represents the composite index).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Correlation between the extreme temperature index and annual accumulated temperature and the extreme precipitation index and annual precipitation. ((<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>): represent the extreme temperature index and annual accumulated temperature and the extreme precipitation index and annual precipitation in Guangxie Co; (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>): represent the extreme temperature index and annual accumulated temperature and the extreme precipitation index and annual precipitation in Tsho Ga).</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 33442 KiB  
Article
A Comprehensive Examination of the Medvezhiy Glacier’s Surges in West Pamir (1968–2023)
by Murodkhudzha Murodov, Lanhai Li, Mustafo Safarov, Mingyang Lv, Amirkhamza Murodov, Aminjon Gulakhmadov, Kabutov Khusrav and Yubao Qiu
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(10), 1730; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16101730 - 14 May 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1238
Abstract
The Vanj River Basin contains a dynamic glacier, the Medvezhiy glacier, which occasionally poses a danger to local residents due to its surging, flooding, and frequent blockages of the Abdukahor River, leading to intense glacial lake outburst floods (GLOF). This study offers a [...] Read more.
The Vanj River Basin contains a dynamic glacier, the Medvezhiy glacier, which occasionally poses a danger to local residents due to its surging, flooding, and frequent blockages of the Abdukahor River, leading to intense glacial lake outburst floods (GLOF). This study offers a new perspective on the quantitative assessment of glacier surface velocities and associated lake changes during six surges from 1968 to 2023 by using time-series imagery (Corona, Hexagon, Landsat), SRTM elevation maps, ITS_LIVE, unmanned aerial vehicles, local climate, and glacier surface elevation changes. Six turbulent periods (1968, 1973, 1977, 1989–1990, 2001, and 2011) were investigated, each lasting three years within a 10–11-year cycle. During inactive phases, a reduction in the thickness of the glacier tongue in the ablation zone occurred. During a surge in 2011, the flow accelerated, creating an ice dam and conditions for GLOF. Using these datasets, we reconstructed the process of the Medvezhiy glacier surge with high detail and identified a clear signal of uplift in the surface above the lower glacier tongue as well as a uniform increase in velocities associated with the onset of the surge. The increased activity of the Medvezhiy glacier and seasonal fluctuations in surface runoff are closely linked to climatic factors throughout the surge phase, and recent UAV observations indicate the absence of GLOFs in the glacier’s channel. Comprehending the processes of glacier movements and related changes at a regional level is crucial for implementing more proactive measures and identifying appropriate strategies for mitigation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Satellite Missions for Earth and Planetary Exploration)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) The location of Pamir region in the map of Tajikistan (solid black line in figure (<b>A</b>)), (<b>C</b>) Vanj River Basin with Medvezhiy glacier (inset), (<b>D</b>) 3D Medvezhiy glacier model, and (<b>E</b>) glacier outlines and water inflow (manually digitized from Landsat image, 1973) and DEM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>River flow overlaps and breakthroughs, with specific references as follows: (<b>1</b>,<b>2</b>) Hexagon KH-9 images from 12 June 1973 and 20 August 1980 (blue and yellow masks indicate the zones where GLOFs have formed); (<b>3</b>) Landsat-5 image from 14 June 1991; (<b>4</b>) UAV image from 20 August 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Comparing the progression and regression of Medvezhiy glacier before and after, using (<b>a</b>) Corona, (<b>b</b>–<b>d</b>) Hexagon, and (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>) Landsat data: The lines depict the initial position of the glacier terminus in early images and its position in the latest images.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Comparing the progression and regression of Medvezhiy glacier before and after, utilizing Landsat data: Subfigures present the glacier’s terminus positions in four intervals: 2001 (<b>a</b>), 2002–2010 (<b>b</b>), 2011–2019 (<b>c</b>), and 2020–2023 (<b>d</b>). The lines illustrate the initial position of the glacier terminus in early images and its position in the latest images.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The location of the Medvezhiy glacier is as follows: (<b>1</b>) Osipova took this photo in June 1973; (<b>2</b>) Murodov M. took this photo on 20 August 2023. The red and yellow lines denote significant changes in the Medvezhiy glacier’s position over time.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Annual velocity profiles along the central branches of the Medvezhiy glacier from 1988 to 2018. The center line of the branch is formed by points (Data source: ITS_LIVE).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Curves of the average and maximum speed of glacier movement over time. Red vertical lines indicate maximum velocity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Surface elevation change of Medvezhiy glacier from 2000–2019 m/year<sup>−1</sup>. Subfigure (<b>A</b>) provides an overview of the glacier’s elevation change throughout the entire period. Subfigures (<b>B</b>–<b>E</b>) zoom in on specific time intervals: 2000–2004, 2004–2009, 2010–2014, and 2015–2019, respectively. Cool colors indicate positive mass balance, whereas warm colors indicate negative mass balance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>An illustration of the Medvezhiy glacier using: (<b>a</b>) slope, (<b>b</b>) hillshade, (<b>c</b>) topography, and (<b>d</b>) aspect.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>(<b>a</b>) Terminus position change of Medvezhiy glacier from 1968 to 2023, (<b>b</b>) average annual temperature, and (<b>c</b>) annual precipitation at Humrogi station.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>GLOF formation on the left bank of the Medvezhiy glacier. Subfigures (<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>) present satellite images captured at different times: (<b>a</b>) Corona KH-4B (18 August 1968), (<b>b</b>) Landsat-5 (12 July 1973), (<b>c</b>) Hexagon KH-9 (13 July 1975), (<b>d</b>,<b>e</b>) Landsat-5 (6 August 1977) and (14 July 1991), and (<b>f</b>) Landsat-8 (22 August 2011). The yellow arrows illustrate the zone where GLOFs form after a glacier surge.</p>
Full article ">
44 pages, 25578 KiB  
Review
Remote Sensing and Modeling of the Cryosphere in High Mountain Asia: A Multidisciplinary Review
by Qinghua Ye, Yuzhe Wang, Lin Liu, Linan Guo, Xueqin Zhang, Liyun Dai, Limin Zhai, Yafan Hu, Nauman Ali, Xinhui Ji, Youhua Ran, Yubao Qiu, Lijuan Shi, Tao Che, Ninglian Wang, Xin Li and Liping Zhu
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(10), 1709; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16101709 - 11 May 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3067
Abstract
Over the past decades, the cryosphere has changed significantly in High Mountain Asia (HMA), leading to multiple natural hazards such as rock–ice avalanches, glacier collapse, debris flows, landslides, and glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs). Monitoring cryosphere change and evaluating its hydrological effects are [...] Read more.
Over the past decades, the cryosphere has changed significantly in High Mountain Asia (HMA), leading to multiple natural hazards such as rock–ice avalanches, glacier collapse, debris flows, landslides, and glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs). Monitoring cryosphere change and evaluating its hydrological effects are essential for studying climate change, the hydrological cycle, water resource management, and natural disaster mitigation and prevention. However, knowledge gaps, data uncertainties, and other substantial challenges limit comprehensive research in climate–cryosphere–hydrology–hazard systems. To address this, we provide an up-to-date, comprehensive, multidisciplinary review of remote sensing techniques in cryosphere studies, demonstrating primary methodologies for delineating glaciers and measuring geodetic glacier mass balance change, glacier thickness, glacier motion or ice velocity, snow extent and water equivalent, frozen ground or frozen soil, lake ice, and glacier-related hazards. The principal results and data achievements are summarized, including URL links for available products and related data platforms. We then describe the main challenges for cryosphere monitoring using satellite-based datasets. Among these challenges, the most significant limitations in accurate data inversion from remotely sensed data are attributed to the high uncertainties and inconsistent estimations due to rough terrain, the various techniques employed, data variability across the same regions (e.g., glacier mass balance change, snow depth retrieval, and the active layer thickness of frozen ground), and poor-quality optical images due to cloudy weather. The paucity of ground observations and validations with few long-term, continuous datasets also limits the utilization of satellite-based cryosphere studies and large-scale hydrological models. Lastly, we address potential breakthroughs in future studies, i.e., (1) outlining debris-covered glacier margins explicitly involving glacier areas in rough mountain shadows, (2) developing highly accurate snow depth retrieval methods by establishing a microwave emission model of snowpack in mountainous regions, (3) advancing techniques for subsurface complex freeze–thaw process observations from space, (4) filling knowledge gaps on scattering mechanisms varying with surface features (e.g., lake ice thickness and varying snow features on lake ice), and (5) improving and cross-verifying the data retrieval accuracy by combining different remote sensing techniques and physical models using machine learning methods and assimilation of multiple high-temporal-resolution datasets from multiple platforms. This comprehensive, multidisciplinary review highlights cryospheric studies incorporating spaceborne observations and hydrological models from diversified techniques/methodologies (e.g., multi-spectral optical data with thermal bands, SAR, InSAR, passive microwave, and altimetry), providing a valuable reference for what scientists have achieved in cryosphere change research and its hydrological effects on the Third Pole. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Remote Sensing in Geology, Geomorphology and Hydrology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Literature on spaceborne cryosphere studies and hydrological models in HMA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Frequency of occurrence in the literature on spaceborne sensors for cryosphere monitoring.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Available DEMs, surface elevation, or surface elevation difference (DH) data in HMA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The mean annual ground temperature (MAGT) [<a href="#B126-remotesensing-16-01709" class="html-bibr">126</a>,<a href="#B127-remotesensing-16-01709" class="html-bibr">127</a>]. (The boundary of HMA is composed of the results by Zhang [<a href="#B128-remotesensing-16-01709" class="html-bibr">128</a>], Lu [<a href="#B29-remotesensing-16-01709" class="html-bibr">29</a>], and Shean [<a href="#B59-remotesensing-16-01709" class="html-bibr">59</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Geodetic glacier mass balance (MB in m w.e.a<sup>−1</sup>) between 2000 and 2020 in HMA with the averaged surface elevation differences by 5 km-sized hexagons from the datasets by Hugonnet et al., 2021 [<a href="#B73-remotesensing-16-01709" class="html-bibr">73</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Region—wide comparison of glacier-specific mass balance (MB, by m w.e.a<sup>−1</sup>) from five publications aggregated over three different regional boundaries in HMA (MB is marked by spots, its uncertainties are shown by the length of the bars, and different colors represents the data from the corresponding literature). (<b>a</b>) HiMAP regions [<a href="#B193-remotesensing-16-01709" class="html-bibr">193</a>]. (<b>b</b>) RGI regions [<a href="#B180-remotesensing-16-01709" class="html-bibr">180</a>]. (<b>c</b>) Regions by Kääb et al. (2015) [<a href="#B15-remotesensing-16-01709" class="html-bibr">15</a>]. (<b>d</b>) The width of the colored bars represents the periods from the five studies across HMA [<a href="#B15-remotesensing-16-01709" class="html-bibr">15</a>,<a href="#B59-remotesensing-16-01709" class="html-bibr">59</a>,<a href="#B64-remotesensing-16-01709" class="html-bibr">64</a>,<a href="#B72-remotesensing-16-01709" class="html-bibr">72</a>,<a href="#B189-remotesensing-16-01709" class="html-bibr">189</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Annual average snow water equivalent (SWE) during (<b>a</b>) 1988–2000 and (<b>b</b>) 2001–2020 (SWE is calculated from snow depth data downloaded from linkage of <a href="https://data.tpdc.ac.cn/zh-hans/data/df40346a-0202-4ed2-bb07-b65dfcda9368" target="_blank">https://data.tpdc.ac.cn/zh-hans/data/df40346a-0202-4ed2-bb07-b65dfcda9368</a> accessed on 25 February 2023).</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 35735 KiB  
Article
Glacial Lake Changes and Risk Assessment in Rongxer Watershed of China–Nepal Economic Corridor
by Sihui Zhang, Yong Nie and Huayu Zhang
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(4), 725; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16040725 - 19 Feb 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2134
Abstract
Glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs) are one of the most severe disasters in alpine regions, releasing a large amount of water and sediment that can cause fatalities and economic loss as well as substantial damage to downstream infrastructures. The risk of GLOFs in [...] Read more.
Glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs) are one of the most severe disasters in alpine regions, releasing a large amount of water and sediment that can cause fatalities and economic loss as well as substantial damage to downstream infrastructures. The risk of GLOFs in the Himalayas is exacerbated by glacier retreat caused by global warming. Critical economic corridors, such as the Rongxer Watershed, are threatened by GLOFs, but the lack of risk assessment specific to the watershed hinders hazard prevention. In this study, we propose a novel model to evaluate the risk of GLOF using a combination of remote sensing observations, GIS, and hydrological models and apply this model to the GLOF risk assessment in the Rongxer Watershed. The results show that (1) the area of glacial lakes in the Rongxer Watershed increased by 31.19% from 11.35 km2 in 1990 to 14.89 km2 in 2020, and (2) 18 lakes were identified as potentially dangerous glacial lakes (PDGLs) that need to be assessed for the GLOF risk, and two of them were categorized as very high risk (Niangzongmajue and Tsho Rolpa). The proposed model was robust in a GLOF risk evaluation by historical GLOFs in the Himalayas. The glacial lake data and GLOF risk assessment model of this study have the potential to be widely used in research on the relationships between glacial lakes and climate change, as well as in disaster mitigation of GLOFs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Distribution of study area. Location of Rongxer watershed in the Himalayas (<b>a</b>) and distribution of settlements, glaciers, rivers, GLOF source lakes, and hydropower project in Rongxer watershed (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Workflow for GLOF risk assessment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>A Scatter plot shows the area differences between the validation samples from our glacial lake dataset and the manually digitized glacial lakes from Google Earth.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The distribution of glacial lakes and their Kernel density in 2020 classified by GLCS1 (<b>a</b>) and GLCS2 (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Changes in count and area of glacial lakes between 1990 and 2022. The count and area of glacial lakes in the Rongxer Watershed were recorded in five periods (<b>a</b>) and various sizes between 1990 and 2020 (<b>b</b>). Altitudinal characteristics of newly emergent lakes (<b>c</b>) and disappeared lakes (<b>d</b>) between 1990 and 2020 by count and area are shown.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Count (<b>a</b>) and area (<b>b</b>) of glacial lakes between 1990 and 2020 based on the GLCS 1. Count (<b>c</b>) and area (<b>d</b>) of glacial lakes between 1990 and 2020 based on the GLCS 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Distribution of hazard levels for PDGLs in 1990 and 2020, and ice avalanche trajectories of typical PDGLs. The distribution of glacial lake hazard levels from 1990 (<b>a</b>) to 2020 (<b>b</b>). The ice avalanche trajectories of Lake 5 in 1990 (<b>c</b>) and 2020 (<b>d</b>). The ice avalanche trajectories of Lake 10 in 1990 (<b>e</b>) and 2020 (<b>f</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The risk level, upper catchment boundary, and ice avalanche susceptibility of each PDGL. The distribution of PDGLs and their risk levels in 2020 (<b>a</b>). The trajectory of ice avalanches into Lake Niangzongmajue is simulated by the MSF model (<b>b</b>). Photos of Lake Niangzongmajue were taken on 30 July 2023 (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>), and the path of simulated inundation from Niangzongmajue (<b>e</b>).</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 5401 KiB  
Article
Glacial Lake Outburst Flood Monitoring and Modeling through Integrating Multiple Remote Sensing Methods and HEC-RAS
by Liye Yang, Zhong Lu, Chaojun Ouyang, Chaoying Zhao, Xie Hu and Qin Zhang
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(22), 5327; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15225327 - 12 Nov 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 4620
Abstract
The Shishapangma region, situated in the middle of the Himalayas, is rich in glacial lakes and glaciers. Hence, glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs) have become a top priority because of the severe threat posed by GLOFs to the downstream settlements. This study presents [...] Read more.
The Shishapangma region, situated in the middle of the Himalayas, is rich in glacial lakes and glaciers. Hence, glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs) have become a top priority because of the severe threat posed by GLOFs to the downstream settlements. This study presents a comprehensive analysis of GLOF hazards using multi-source remote sensing datasets and designs a flood model considering the different breaching depths and release volumes for the Galong Co region. Based on high-resolution optical images, we derived the expanding lake area and volume of glacial lakes. We monitored deformation velocity and long-term deformation time series around the lake dam with Small BAseline Subset Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (SBAS-InSAR). The glacier thinning trend was obtained from the difference in the Digital Elevation Model (DEM). We identified potential avalanche sources by combining topographic slope and measurable deformation. We then carried out flood modeling under three different scenarios using the hydrodynamic model HEC-RAS for Galong Co, which is formed upstream of Nyalam. The results show that the Nyalam region is exposed to high-intensity GLOFs in all scenarios. The larger breaching depth and release volumes caused a greater flow depth and peak discharge. Overall, the multiple remote sensing approaches can be applied to other glacial lakes, and the modeling can be used as a basis for GLOF mitigation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Landscape of the Galong Co and Gangxi Co region. An inset map showing the location of the study area in High-Mountain Asia. (<b>a</b>) DEM superimposed by the footprints of ALOS-1 PALSAR-1 and ALOS-2 PALSAR-2 SAR images and Planet-based optical images. The elevation in the study area ranges from ~4000 m to ~8000 m. (<b>b</b>) An enlarged view of the red box in panel (<b>a</b>) (Google Earth).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Spatiotemporal baseline of SBAS-InSAR method with ALOS-1 PALSAR-1 and ALOS-2 PALSAR-2 datasets. The different color and shapes present the acquisition of SAR images at different datasets. (<b>a</b>) Baseline network of interferograms from ALOS-1 datasets. (<b>b</b>) Baseline network of interferograms from ALOS-2 datasets. (<b>c</b>) Baseline network used to link the time series for ALOS-1/2 datasets.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Temperature and precipitation changes during 1990–2016 at the Nyalam station (~17 km away from the study area). T represents temperature in °C, y represents year, and P represents precipitation in mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Flowchart of remote sensing data ingestion, processing, and modeling.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Area and volume expansion of Galong Co and Gangxi Co from 1990 to 2020. (<b>a</b>) The lake changes of Galong Co and Gangxi Co during 1990–2020. (<b>b</b>) The empirical relationship between lake area and volume proposed by Zhang et al. [<a href="#B13-remotesensing-15-05327" class="html-bibr">13</a>] (<b>c</b>) The area expansion of Galong Co and Gangxi Co. (<b>d</b>) The volume expansion of Galong Co and Gangxi Co.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Deformation velocity and time series around the lake dam of Galong Co. (<b>a</b>) The LOS deformation velocity on ALOS-1 data during 2007–2011. (<b>b</b>) The LOS deformation velocity on ALOS-2 data during 2014–2020. (<b>c</b>) The deformation time series from 2007 to 2020 at D1 and D2 on the dam. (<b>d</b>) The deformation time series from 2007 to 2020 at D3 and D4 on the dam.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Topographic slope and glacier thickness change for four potential avalanche source zones. (<b>a</b>) The slope of the potential avalanche zones, named SC1, SC2, SC3 and SC4. (<b>b</b>) The glacier thickness changes in four potential zones during 1975–2000. (<b>c</b>). The glacier thickness changes in four potential zones during 2000–2016. Four dotted black lines represent four selected profiles on their potential avalanche zones. (<b>d</b>–<b>g</b>) The thickness changes in the four avalanche zones, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Schematic summarization of potential avalanche zones, lake size, and the GLOF process. (<b>a</b>) The deformation rates of four potential avalanche zones and the lake shore of Galong Co. The red lines represent the glacier boundary from the Randolph Glacier Inventory (RGI6.0). The cyan areas represent SC1-SC4, shown in <a href="#remotesensing-15-05327-f007" class="html-fig">Figure 7</a>. (<b>b</b>) The avalanche’s movement into the lake, and related GLOF process chains that may happen in the future.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>A rapid development and expansion of the buildings in Nyalam from 2009 to 2019 (Google Earth images). (<b>a</b>) The GLOF path and Nyalam town, the red and yellow boxes represent Nyalam, the positions b–f, respectively. (<b>b</b>–<b>f</b>) The expansion buildings at position b–f in Nyalam.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The flooding depth and discharge of various scenarios. (<b>a</b>) The maximum flow depth for Galong Co with the release of the whole lake volume with the largest breach depth (D1–V1). The enlarged map shows the downstream flooding in Nyalam. (<b>b</b>) The GLOF depth and discharge of different process chain scenarios at Nyalam.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 9852 KiB  
Article
Inventory of Glacial Lake in the Southeastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Derived from Sentinel-1 SAR Image and Sentinel-2 MSI Image
by Yuan Zhang, Jun Zhao, Xiaojun Yao, Hongyu Duan, Jianxia Yang and Wenlong Pang
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(21), 5142; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15215142 - 27 Oct 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1482
Abstract
The glacial lakes in the Southeastern Qinghai–Tibet Plateau (SEQTP) have undergone dramatic expansion in the context of global warming, leading to several glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs) disasters. However, there is a gap and incompleteness in glacial lake inventories across this area due [...] Read more.
The glacial lakes in the Southeastern Qinghai–Tibet Plateau (SEQTP) have undergone dramatic expansion in the context of global warming, leading to several glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs) disasters. However, there is a gap and incompleteness in glacial lake inventories across this area due to the heavy cloud cover. In this study, an updated and comprehensive glacial lake inventory was produced by object-based image analysis (OBIA) and manual vectorization based on the Sentinel-1 SAR and Sentinel-2 MSI images acquired in 2022. Detailed steps regarding the OBIA were provided, and the feature set of Sentinel-1 SAR images suitable for extracting glacial lakes was also determined in this paper. We found that the mean combination of ascending-orbit and descending-orbit images is appropriate for mapping glacial lakes. VV-polarized backscattering coefficients from ascending-orbit achieved a better performance for delineating glacial lakes within the study area. Moreover, the distribution of glacial lakes was characterized in terms of four aspects: size, type, elevation, and space. There were 3731 glacial lakes with a total area of 1664.22 ± 0.06 km2 in the study area; most of them were less than 0.07 km2. Ice-contacted lakes were primarily located in the Palongzangbo basin (13.24 ± 0.08 km2). Nyang Qu basin had the most abundant glacial lake resources (2456 and 93.32 ± 0.18 km2). A comparison with previously published glacial lake datasets demonstrated that our dataset is more complete. This inventory is useful for evaluating water resources, studying glacier–glacial lake interactions, and assessing GLOFs’ susceptibility in the SEQTP. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>The location of the study area in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (<b>a</b>) and the geographical setting of the SEQTP (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The glacial lake mapping workflow.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The manifestation of some glacial lakes in Sentinel-2 MSI true-color composite (TCC) images and Sentinel-1 SAR images with different polarization modes and flight directions. (<b>a1</b>–<b>a3</b>) are the Sentinel-2 TCC images. (<b>b1</b>–<b>b3</b>,<b>c1</b>–<b>c3</b>) are the VV-polarized and VH-polarized Sentinel-1 SAR image with a flight direction of ascending orbit, respectively. (<b>d1</b>–<b>d3</b>,<b>e1</b>–<b>e3</b>) are the VV-polarized and VH-polarized Sentinel-1SAR image with a flight direction of descending orbit, respectively. The red plates indicate the location of the glacial lakes in the figure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The segmentation results (red boundaries) of different segment scales with a fixed shape weight and compactness weight of 0.1 and 0.5, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The optimal scale parameter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The relation between the number of variables and the Overall Accuracy (OA) and Kappa coefficient.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Number and area of glacial lakes of different types (<b>a</b>) and sizes (<b>b</b>) within the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The altitude distribution of glacial lakes in terms of number, area (<b>a</b>) and type (<b>b</b>) within the study area. Bubble colors in subfigure (<b>b</b>) represent the types of glacial lakes shown in the horizontal axis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The spatial distribution of glacial lakes in terms of area and type within the study area (<b>a</b>) and glacial lakes area of different types in the three sub-basin (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Empirical relationship between area and volume of ice-contacted lakes over the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Estimated ice-contacted lake volume across the SEQTP in 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The comparison between the glacial lakes compiled in this study and other studies. Backgrounds of (<b>a</b>,<b>d</b>–<b>g</b>,<b>i</b>) are the Sentinel MSI TCC images from August to October 2022. Background of (<b>b</b>) is the Sentinel-1 SAR image (VV-polarized backscatter coefficient for August, September and August as RGB). Background of (<b>c</b>) is the Sentinel-1 SAR image for August 2022. Background of (<b>h</b>) is the Landsat OLI image acquired on 19 August 2016 (Bands 6, 5, 2). (<b>j</b>) is the frequency of reasons for discrepancies between this paper and the Wang et al. [<a href="#B8-remotesensing-15-05142" class="html-bibr">8</a>], Chen et al. [<a href="#B19-remotesensing-15-05142" class="html-bibr">19</a>], Zhang et al. [<a href="#B17-remotesensing-15-05142" class="html-bibr">17</a>] and Shugar et al. [<a href="#B28-remotesensing-15-05142" class="html-bibr">28</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Correlation of number of glacial lakes produced by this study with that of Wang et al. [<a href="#B8-remotesensing-15-05142" class="html-bibr">8</a>], Chen et al. [<a href="#B19-remotesensing-15-05142" class="html-bibr">19</a>], Zhang et al. [<a href="#B17-remotesensing-15-05142" class="html-bibr">17</a>] and Shugar et al. [<a href="#B28-remotesensing-15-05142" class="html-bibr">28</a>] over a 15.5 km × 16.7 km grid. The blue circles are correlations between our result and their results, the red lines are the fitting curves between our result and their results, and the green line is the 1:1 diagonal line.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 11429 KiB  
Technical Note
The Formation of an Ice-Contact Proglacial Lake and Its Impact on Glacier Change: A Case Study of the Tanymas Lake and Fedchenko Glacier
by Zhijie Li, Ninglian Wang, Jiawen Chang and Quan Zhang
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(11), 2745; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15112745 - 25 May 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2527
Abstract
Lake-terminating glaciers have some peculiar behaviors compared to land-terminating glaciers, but in-depth observation is still limited regarding their formation, which is crucial for understanding the glacier–lake interaction. Here, the long-term evolutions of Tanymas Lake and the Fedchenko Glacier were investigated based on Landsat [...] Read more.
Lake-terminating glaciers have some peculiar behaviors compared to land-terminating glaciers, but in-depth observation is still limited regarding their formation, which is crucial for understanding the glacier–lake interaction. Here, the long-term evolutions of Tanymas Lake and the Fedchenko Glacier were investigated based on Landsat images, Google Earth imagery, KH-9 images, glacier surface elevation and velocity change datasets, and meteorological records. The results indicate that Tanymas Lake is both an ice-contact proglacial lake and an ice-dammed lake. It covered an area of 1.10 km2 in September 2022, and it is one of the largest glacial lakes in Pamir and even in HMA. The initial basin of Tanymas Lake is a moraine depression in Tanymas Pass, and the blocked dam is the Tanymas-5 Glacier and its terminal moraine. Tanymas Lake was in an embryonic stage before August 2005, in a formation and expansion stage from August 2005 to September 2018, and in a new expansion stage after September 2018. In this process, the Tanymas terminus of the Fedchenko Glacier also transformed from a land terminus to a partial lake terminus, and then to a complete lake terminus. The formation of Tanymas Lake is associated with the accumulation of glacial meltwater and the blockage of drainage, while the slow expansion of Tanymas Lake is related to the cold climate and slight glacier mass loss of Central Pamir. In the coming decades, with the accelerated mass loss of the Tanymas terminus of the Fedchenko Glacier, the area, depth, and water storage of Tanymas Lake will continue to increase, accompanied by the growing GLOF risk. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing for Surface Water Monitoring)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>The geographic location of the Fedchenko Glacier and Tanymas Lake.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The formation and expansion of Tanymas Lake. The (<b>a</b>) was derived from the KH-9 image, (<b>b</b>–<b>e</b>,<b>g</b>,<b>h</b>) were derived from the Landsat images, and (<b>f</b>,<b>i</b>) were derived from the Google Earth imagery. The green arrows in (<b>d</b>,<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>) indicate the ice broke off in August 2005.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Glacier-wide annual ice thinning rates between 2000 and 2016. The altitudinal distribution of the mean surface elevation change and glacier area for the Fedchenko (above 4500 m a.s.l.) (<b>b</b>), G072369E38769N (<b>c</b>), and Tanymas-5 Glaciers (<b>d</b>). Note the different scales of the glacier area in (<b>b</b>–<b>d</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Cumulative area changes of the Tanymas Lake, the Fedchenko terminus, and the Tanymas terminus; (<b>b</b>) the area variations of Tanymas Lake after 2005.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Glacier-wide average surface velocity between 1985 and 2018 derived from ITS_LIVE datasets; (<b>b</b>–<b>g</b>) the calculation results of glacier surface velocity of the COSI-Corr tool.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Mean monthly (<b>a</b>) and annual (<b>b</b>) air temperature and precipitation at Gorbunov station from 1935 to 1994.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The area changes of ice-contact lakes (&gt;0.1 km<sup>2</sup>) in HMA from 1990 to 2018. The polygon data of ice-contact lakes and glacier regions derived from Wang et al. [<a href="#B22-remotesensing-15-02745" class="html-bibr">22</a>] and The Randolph Glacier Inventory version 6.0, respectively.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 11246 KiB  
Article
Characterization of Three Surges of the Kyagar Glacier, Karakoram
by Zhen Zhang, Jinbiao Zhao, Shiyin Liu, Qibing Zhang, Zongli Jiang, Yangyang Xu and Haoran Su
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(8), 2113; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15082113 - 17 Apr 2023
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 2056
Abstract
Glaciers experience periodic variations in flow velocity called surges, each of which influences the glacier’s characteristics and the occurrence of downstream disasters (e.g., ice-dammed lake outburst floods). The Karakoram region contains many surging glaciers, yet there are few comprehensive studies of multiple surge [...] Read more.
Glaciers experience periodic variations in flow velocity called surges, each of which influences the glacier’s characteristics and the occurrence of downstream disasters (e.g., ice-dammed lake outburst floods). The Karakoram region contains many surging glaciers, yet there are few comprehensive studies of multiple surge cycles. In this work, Landsat, topographic map, Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM), TerraSAR-X/TanDEM-X, ITS_LIVE, and Sentinel-1 glacier velocity data were used to systematically analyze the characteristics of Kyagar Glacier since the 1970s. Three surging events were identified, with active phases in 1975–1978, 1995–1997, and 2014–2016. The timing of these surges was similar, with a cycle of 19–20 years, an active phase of 3–4 years, and a quiescent phase of 16–17 years. During the quiescent phase, a large amount of ice accumulates in the lower part of the accumulation zone, and the terminal of the tongue thins significantly. According to the most recent surge event (2014–2016), glacier flow accelerated suddenly in the active phase and reached a maximum velocity of 2 ± 0.08 m d−1. Then, the glacier terminal thickened sharply, the reservoir zone thinned by 12 ± 0.2 m, and the terminal receiving zone thickened by 28 ± 0.2 m. The glacier may have entered a quiescent phase after July 2016. The glacier surge causes a large amount of material to transfer from upstream to downstream, forming an ice dam and creating conditions for a glacial lake outburst flood (GLOF). At the termination of the active phase, the subglacial drainage channel became effective, triggering the GLOF. For a period of the quiescent phase, the glacier ablation intensifies and the GLOF repeats constantly. One surge caused 7–8 GLOFs, and then a continuous reduction in the ice dam elevation. Eventually, the ice dam disappeared, and the GLOF no longer continued before the next glacier-surging event. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Kyagar Glacier. Location within the (<b>a</b>) Tibetan Plateau and (<b>b</b>) Karakoram Mountains. (<b>c</b>) Landsat image from 4 July 2015. The pink line indicates the position of a longitudinal profile used to analyze glacier velocity and elevation changes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Glacier boundary and glacial lake boundary in different periods from 1975 to 1978.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Glacier and glacial lake boundaries in different periods from 1995 to 1997.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Glacier and glacial lake boundaries in different periods from 2013 to 2016.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The change in the length of the glacier over a period of time after the beginning of the surge. A negative abscissa means before the surge. The error bar represents uncertainty in the length of the glacier.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Spatial and temporal distributions in glacier velocity along the longitudinal profile in <a href="#remotesensing-15-02113-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a> during 1989–2018 (Data source: ITS_LIVE).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Curves of mean and maximum glacier velocities with time. Pink vertical lines represent GLOF events. Historical GLOF records were from Round et al. [<a href="#B30-remotesensing-15-02113" class="html-bibr">30</a>] and our study. We determine GLOF events based on the disappearance of glacial lakes in remote sensing images.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Spatial and temporal distributions in glacier velocity along the longitudinal profile in <a href="#remotesensing-15-02113-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a> during 2014–2021.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Glacier elevation changes in different periods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Glacier elevation change profiles in different periods (the longitudinal profile in <a href="#remotesensing-15-02113-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Glacial lake outburst volumes (columns) and annual temperature and precipitation times series from 1959 to 2020. The volumes were derived from (1) 1959–2016 = Round et al. [<a href="#B30-remotesensing-15-02113" class="html-bibr">30</a>], (2) 2018 = Zhang et al. [<a href="#B45-remotesensing-15-02113" class="html-bibr">45</a>], and (3) 2017, 2019, and 2020 = estimates of lake areas in satellite images according to the method of Round et al. [<a href="#B30-remotesensing-15-02113" class="html-bibr">30</a>]. Temperature and precipitation were derived from ERA5 data.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 7948 KiB  
Article
Monitoring Glacier Lake Outburst Flood (GLOF) of Lake Merzbacher Using Dense Chinese High-Resolution Satellite Images
by Changjun Gu, Suju Li, Ming Liu, Kailong Hu and Ping Wang
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(7), 1941; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15071941 - 5 Apr 2023
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 4919
Abstract
Establishing an effective real-time monitoring and early warning system for glacier lake outburst floods (GLOFs) requires a full understanding of their occurrence mechanism. However, the harsh conditions and hard-to-reach locations of these glacial lakes limit detailed fieldwork, making satellite imagery a critical tool [...] Read more.
Establishing an effective real-time monitoring and early warning system for glacier lake outburst floods (GLOFs) requires a full understanding of their occurrence mechanism. However, the harsh conditions and hard-to-reach locations of these glacial lakes limit detailed fieldwork, making satellite imagery a critical tool for monitoring. Lake Mercbacher, an ice-dammed lake in the central Tian Shan mountain range, poses a significant threat downstream due to its relatively high frequency of outbursts. In this study, we first monitored the daily changes in the lake area before the 2022 Lake Mercbacher outburst. Additionally, based on historical satellite images from 2014 to 2021, we calculated the maximum lake area (MLA) and its changes before the outburst. Furthermore, we extracted the proportion of floating ice and water area during the period. The results show that the lake area of Lake Mercbacher would first increase at a relatively low speed (0.01 km2/day) for about one month, followed by a relatively high-speed increase (0.04 km2/day) until reaching the maximum, which would last for about twenty days. Then, the lake area would decrease slowly until the outburst, which would last five days and is significant for early warning. Moreover, the floating ice and water proportion provides more information about the outburst signals. In 2022, we found that the floating ice area increased rapidly during the early warning stage, especially one day before the outburst, accounting for about 50% of the total lake area. Historical evidence indicates that the MLA shows a decreasing trend, and combining it with the outburst date and climate data, we found that the outburst date shows an obvious advance trend (6 days per decade) since 1902, caused by climate warming. Earlier melting results in an earlier outburst. This study provides essential references for monitoring Lake Mercbacher GLOFs and building an effective early warning system. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The location of lake Merzbacher.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Satellite image (<b>a</b>) and image after calculating the NDWI (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Maximum lake area (MLA) change before outburst since 2014. (<b>a</b>) MLA extent in each year and overlay on the image obtained on 1 August 2014; (<b>b</b>) MLA changes from 2014 to 2022; (<b>c</b>–<b>j</b>) MLA overlay on images obtained from 2015 to 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Lake extent change in 2022 before and after the outburst.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Centroid changes of lake area in historical and 2022 before the outburst.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Water area and Ice area of Lake Merzbacher before the outburst from 2014 to 2022 (<b>a</b>); Water area and Ice area daily changes before the outburst (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Date of Lake Merzbacher outburst since 1902. (<b>a</b>) Lake Merzbacher outburst Frequency in different months since 1902; (<b>b</b>) Lake Merzbacher outburst date since 1902; (<b>c</b>) The relationship between the outburst date and the hottest date since 1902.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Detailed records of outburst date from Lake Merzbacher from 1902 to 2022 (<b>a</b>). Temperature changes in Lake Merzbacher from 1981 to 2022 (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Satellite image of Lake Merzbacher captured in 4 May 2022.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 29438 KiB  
Article
Remote Sensing Monitoring and Analysis of Jinwuco Lateral Moraine Landslide-Glacial Lake Outburst in Southeast Tibet
by Yaping Gao, Wenguang Yang, Rui Guo and Liming Jiang
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(6), 1475; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15061475 - 7 Mar 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2888
Abstract
On 25 June 2020, a glacial lake outburst flood (GLOF) occurred in Jinwuco, Nidou Zangbo, and southeast Tibet, causing catastrophic damage to multiple infrastructures such as roads, bridges, and farmlands in the surrounding and downstream areas. Due to the lack of long-term monitoring [...] Read more.
On 25 June 2020, a glacial lake outburst flood (GLOF) occurred in Jinwuco, Nidou Zangbo, and southeast Tibet, causing catastrophic damage to multiple infrastructures such as roads, bridges, and farmlands in the surrounding and downstream areas. Due to the lack of long-term monitoring of glacial lake and glacier changes in the region and the surrounding surface, the spatial and temporal evolutionary characteristics and triggering factors of the disaster still need to be determined. Here, we combine multi-temporal optical remote sensing image interpretation, surface deformation monitoring with synthetic aperture radar (SAR)/InSAR, meteorological observation data, and corresponding soil moisture change information to systematically analyze the spatial and temporal evolution characteristics and triggering factors of this GLOF disaster. Optical images taken between 1987 and 2020 indicate that the glacial lake’s initial area of 0.39 km2 quickly grew to 0.56 km2, then plummeted to 0.26 km2 after the catastrophe. Meanwhile, we found obvious signs of slippage beside the lateral moraine at the junction of the glacier’s terminus and the glacial lake. The pixel offset tracking (POT) results based on SAR images acquired before and after the disaster reveal that the western lateral moraine underwent a 40 m line of sight (LOS) deformation. The small baseline subset InSAR (SBAS-InSAR) results from 2017 to 2021 show that the cumulative deformation of the slope around the lateral moraine increased in the rainy season before the disaster, with a maximum cumulative deformation of −52 mm in 120 days and gradually stabilized after the disaster. However, there are three long-term deformation areas on the slope above it, showing an increasing trend after the disaster, with cumulative deformation exceeding −30 mm during the monitoring period. The lateral moraine collapse occurred in a warm climate with continuous and intense precipitation, and the low backscatter intensity prior to the slide suggests that the soil was very moist. Intense rainfall is thought to be the catalyst for lateral moraine collapse, whereas the lateral moraine falling into the glacier lake is the direct cause of the GLOF. This study shows that the joint active–passive remote sensing technique can accurately obtain the spatial and temporal evolution characteristics and triggering factors of GLOF. It is helpful to understand the GLOF event caused by the slide of lateral moraine more comprehensively, which is essential for further work related to glacial lake hazard assessment. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The location of Jinwuco Lake and its parent glacier. (<b>a</b>) Spatial position of the study region in the Tibetan Plateau. (<b>b</b>) A red rectangle denotes the coverage area of the image and the red pentagram represents the location of the study area. (<b>c</b>) Overall view of the glacier and glacial lake. (<b>d</b>) Local enlargement of the glacier terminus connected with the glacial lake from Google Earth. The black triangle is the selected radar backscatter feature point for analyzing the GLOF trigger factors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The workflow chart of this paper.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Spatial−temporal baseline for each period. (<b>a</b>–<b>e</b>) represent spatial−temporal baselines for different time periods, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The changes of glacier lake area and glacier terminus. (<b>a</b>). the changes of the glacier lake area, (<b>b</b>). the changes of the glacier terminus.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Optical remote sensing image recognition of lateral moraine collapse. The red rectangle represents the range of the slip zone. The blue polygon represents the boundary of the glacial lake. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) represent the optical remote sensing images before and after the GLOF event. The black rectangle represents the lake’s drainage outlet. The blue dashed line represents the flood flow area near the lake.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The results of the surface deformation around the glacial lake are shown in a radar coordinate. It is important to note that its direction of which is shown approximately upside down compared to the direction of the geographical coordinates. The white dashed box indicates the deformation area, red rectangle represents the collapse zone and the light blue polygon represents the Jinwuco lake.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The lateral moraine and glacier lake dam deformation before and after the GLOF event. The purple dotted line represents the extent of the lake. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) are the range and azimuthal deformation of the ground surface, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Surface deformation monitoring results of the mountains around the glacial lake. (<b>a</b>–<b>e</b>) represent the cumulative deformation of different monitoring cycles in radar coordinate. P1–P4 are the selected typical deformation areas. (<b>f</b>–<b>i</b>) represent the time series deformation results for each region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Correlation analysis between ground temperature, precipitation and relatively backscatter intensity of landslide for black triangle marked in <a href="#remotesensing-15-01475-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>d.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 4542 KiB  
Article
Exploring Contrastive Representation for Weakly-Supervised Glacial Lake Extraction
by Hang Zhao, Shuang Wang, Xuebin Liu and Fang Chen
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(5), 1456; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15051456 - 5 Mar 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2309
Abstract
Against the background of the ongoing atmospheric warming, the glacial lakes that are nourished and expanded in High Mountain Asia pose growing risks of glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs) hazards and increasing threats to the downstream areas. Effectively extracting the area and consistently [...] Read more.
Against the background of the ongoing atmospheric warming, the glacial lakes that are nourished and expanded in High Mountain Asia pose growing risks of glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs) hazards and increasing threats to the downstream areas. Effectively extracting the area and consistently monitoring the dynamics of these lakes are of great significance in predicting and preventing GLOF events. To automatically extract the lake areas, many deep learning (DL) methods capable of capturing the multi-level features of lakes have been proposed in segmentation and classification tasks. However, the portability of these supervised DL methods need to be improved in order to be directly applied to different data sources, as they require laborious effort to collect the labeled lake masks. In this work, we proposed a simple glacial lake extraction model (SimGL) via weakly-supervised contrastive learning to extend and improve the extraction performances in cases that lack the labeled lake masks. In SimGL, a Siamese network was employed to learn similar objects by maximizing the similarity between the input image and its augmentations. Then, a simple Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) map was provided as the location cue instead of the labeled lake masks to constrain the model to capture the representations related to the glacial lakes and the segmentations to coincide with the true lake areas. Finally, the experimental results of the glacial lake extraction on the 1540 Landsat-8 image patches showed that our approach, SimGL, offers a competitive effort with some supervised methods (such as Random Forest) and outperforms other unsupervised image segmentation methods in cases that lack true image labels. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Different inputs and training strategies in contrastive learning and traditional deep learning (DL) methods in glacial lake mapping. DL methods always need to input labeled lake masks to construct the loss function, while contrastive learning calculates the loss function between the input image only and its augmentations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The architecture of the proposed SimGL. It consists of two parts: one takes the RS image and its augmentations as input pairs for a Siamese network, which generates a set of feature maps at different scales. Then applying the prediction layer on projected features from one branch to predict the transform features from another branch, and we use a contrastive loss to measure the similarity between the two features. Another part only takes the RS image as input, then a location loss was calculated between the output map (generated by decoding the multi-scale features) and location cues (generated by thresholding the NDWI map) to constrain the segmentation results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Different ways to generate the augmentations of multi-band RS images.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The effects of coefficient λ on the segmentation results. The horizontal axis is the range of λ from 10<sup>−4</sup> to 10<sup>4</sup>, and the vertical axis reflects the value of each metric. Obviously, optimal segmentation performance of F1 and IoU occurred as the λ reached 10.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The effects between thresholds and evaluation metrics on the NDWI, MNDWI and MI, respectively. (<b>a</b>) Threshold ablation for NDWI. We set 0.6 of the NDWI threshold for further experiments as it can balance the lake information and noise information. (<b>b</b>) Threshold ablation for MNDWI. The best threshold of MNDWI should be 0.6 for providing pseudo lake masks. (<b>c</b>) Threshold ablation for MI. The best threshold of MNDWI should be 0.7 for providing pseudo lake masks.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Two visualized samples of SimGL when setting different thresholds and WIs in the pseudo label generation stage. The blue area is lakes extracted by SimGL. From visualizations, the model output is closest to the ground truth when we set the threshold in the range of [0.5, 0.7] on NDWI.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Visualization of segmentation results of the glacial lake by employing different methods. Extracted lakes are marked in blue. (<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>) are six regions of glacial lakes developed in different surroundings.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The visualization results of our model SimGL conducting on four different RS images. The blue areas are extracted lakes. The first row shows the RS images from Landsat-5 TM, Landsat-7 ETM+, Landsat-8 OLI and Sentinel-2A. The second row is the segmentation results by thresholding the NDWI map with a value of 0.6, the pixels great than this value will be marked as lake pixels. The third row is the testing results using our model SimGL.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop