[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (7)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Backpack MMS

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
26 pages, 9447 KiB  
Article
Design and Analysis of an Electric Integrated Work Vehicle for Corn Intertillage Fertilization and Pesticide Spraying
by Dongdong Gu, Jiahan Zhang, Yijie Ding, Yongzhen Wang, Jie Yang, Ge Shi, Bin Li and Junqiang Zhao
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(23), 11356; https://doi.org/10.3390/app142311356 - 5 Dec 2024
Viewed by 814
Abstract
In response to the situation in the Huanghuai region, where corn fertilization and pesticide application primarily rely on manual methods such as hand broadcasting fertilizer and using manual backpack sprayers, resulting in low levels of mechanization, this study designed an electric integrated work [...] Read more.
In response to the situation in the Huanghuai region, where corn fertilization and pesticide application primarily rely on manual methods such as hand broadcasting fertilizer and using manual backpack sprayers, resulting in low levels of mechanization, this study designed an electric integrated work vehicle in line with the trend of developing new energy. The vehicle is powered by six 12 V, 100 Ah lead-acid batteries and integrates the functions of fertilization and pesticide spraying. It can achieve precise hole-fertilization, applying fertilizer to a depth of 100 to 150 mm near the roots of corn, and can also perform multi-row pesticide spraying. The vehicle’s electronic control system is divided into two functional areas: 220 V and 24 V. The walking system uses a 220 V, 2 kW AC servo motor, which is driven by converting the voltage of the 72 V battery group into a 220 V sine wave AC through an inverter, and the motor speed can be adjusted. The working width is adjusted by two fixed electric cylinders at the top of the rear wheel frame. The user can preset the width through the control panel, and during operation, the electric cylinders can be automatically controlled to the optimal working width via a whisker-type limit switch. Analysis using ADAMS software shows that when the vehicle speed is 2, 3, and 5 km per hour, the opening angles of the duckbill controller are 66°, 58°, and 48°, respectively, indicating that the higher the speed, the smaller the opening angle. This shortens the fertilization interval time and makes the fertilization spacing more stable. The maximum opening angle of the adjacent duckbill is 25°, indicating that the fertilization amount remains stable. When the vehicle is moving in reverse, the duckbill always remains closed, and at different speeds, the opening angle change curve of the duckbill controller is smooth and regular. This vehicle significantly improves the efficiency and precision of corn planting. However, improvements are still needed in battery technology, control system optimization, and the high cost of electric agricultural machinery to promote the widespread application of agricultural mechanization. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Agricultural Science and Technology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>High-clearance structure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Overall structure of the work vehicle. 1—Front steering mechanism and control panel. 2—Seat. 3—Frame. 4—Rear wheel. 5—Battery pack. 6—Liquid pesticide tank. 7—Foldable spraying lifting frame. 8—Disc hole-pricking fertilizer applicator. 9—Fertilizer tank. 10—Fertilization lifting mechanism.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Physical map of the work vehicle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Working diagram of the work vehicle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Schematic diagram of mechanism frame. 1—Connecting frame. 2—Searchlight. 3—Emergency stop button. 4—Steering wheel. 5—Control panel. 6—Seat. 7—Pesticide box. 8—Wheelbase adjustment mechanism. 9—Frame lifting mechanism. 10—Travelling drive motor. 11—Transformer. 12—Control electric box. 13—Detect plant limit switch. (<b>a</b>) Side front view of structure and partial enlargement. (<b>b</b>) Rear structural drawings and partial enlargement.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Schematic diagram of fertilizer application monobloc mechanism. 1—Fertilizer spreader connection and limit points. 2—Fertilizer spreader upper arm. 3—Fertilizer tank. 4—Fertilizer spreader lower movable arm. 5—Plant detection limit switch. 6—Electric cylinder. 7—Bellows. 8—Disc hole-pricking fertilizer applicator.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Fertilizer support structure diagram. 1—Positioning pin. 2—Connecting spring. 3—Mounting hole. 4—Lower arm movable slide groove. 5—Limit pin. 6—Traverse scale. 7—Fastening bolt. 8—Detector bracket.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Schematic diagram of the corn spraying mechanism. 1—Electric cylinder. 2—Parallel four-link mechanism. 3—Three-stage folding spray frame. 4—Searchlight. 5—Medicine box. 6—Water pump. 7—Water hose. 8—Nozzle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Folding mechanism diagram. 1—Pin. 2—Quick-release hinge.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Flowchart of the electric control system of the work vehicle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Vehicle electrical control cabinet. 1—220 V voltage zone. 2—24 V voltage zone.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Installation drawing of the inverter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Installation drawing of the drive motor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Physical map of walking control. 1—Speed knob. 2—Emergency stop knob. 3—Forward and reverse knob. 4—Power switch. 5—Foot switch. 6—Power steering motor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Voltage grouping wiring diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Servo system wiring diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Installation diagram of the limit switch.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Vehicle width adjustment circuit diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Schematic diagram of disc hole-pricking fertilizer applicator. 1—Feed mouth. 2—Duckbill opening and closing controller. 3—Fixed duckbill. 4—Movable duckbill and lever. 5—Disc fertilizer temporary storage box. 6—Open and close controller moving parts. 7—Rolling bearing.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Schematic diagram of duckbill opening and closing movement.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Schematic diagram of reversing of disc hole-pricking fertilizer applicator.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Model import into ADAMS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 23
<p>Create marker coordinates. (<b>a</b>) Coordinates of the duckbill opening and closing controller marker. (<b>b</b>) Duckbill marker coordinates.</p>
Full article ">Figure 24
<p>Simulation results of duckbill opening and closing controller. (<b>a</b>) Parameters when the speed of the work vehicle is 2 km/h. (<b>b</b>) Parameters when the speed of the work vehicle is 3 km/h. (<b>c</b>) Parameter when the speed of the work vehicle is 5 km/h.</p>
Full article ">Figure 25
<p>Simulation results of duckbill. (<b>a</b>) Parameters when the speed of the work vehicle is 2 km/h. (<b>b</b>) Parameters when the speed of the work vehicle is 3 km/h. (<b>c</b>) Parameters when the speed of the work vehicle is 5 km/h.</p>
Full article ">Figure 26
<p>Drive in reverse.</p>
Full article ">Figure 27
<p>Vehicle retrograde simulation results. (<b>a</b>) Parameters when the speed of the work vehicle is −2 km/h. (<b>b</b>) Parameters when the speed of the work vehicle is −3 km/h. (<b>c</b>) Parameters when the speed of the work vehicle is −5 km/h.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 6623 KiB  
Article
Research on High-Performance Fourier Transform Algorithms Based on the NPU
by Qing Li, Decheng Zuo, Yi Feng and Dongxin Wen
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(1), 405; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14010405 - 1 Jan 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2954
Abstract
Backpack computers require powerful, intelligent computing capabilities for field wearables while taking energy consumption into careful consideration. A recommended solution for this demand is the CPU + NPU-based SoC. In many wearable intelligence applications, the Fourier Transform is an essential, computationally intensive preprocessing [...] Read more.
Backpack computers require powerful, intelligent computing capabilities for field wearables while taking energy consumption into careful consideration. A recommended solution for this demand is the CPU + NPU-based SoC. In many wearable intelligence applications, the Fourier Transform is an essential, computationally intensive preprocessing task. However, due to the unique structure of the NPU, the conventional Fourier Transform algorithms cannot be applied directly to it. This paper proposes two NPU-accelerated Fourier Transform algorithms that leverage the unique hardware structure of the NPU and provides three implementations of those algorithms, namely MM-2DFT, MV-2FFTm, and MV-2FFTv. Then, we benchmarked the speed and energy efficiency of our algorithms for the gray image edge filtering task on the Huawei Atlas200I-DK-A2 development kits against the Cooley-Tukey algorithm running on CPU and GPU platforms. The experiment results reveal MM-2DFT outperforms OpenCL-based FFT on NVIDIA Tegra X2 GPU for small input sizes, with a 4- to 8-time speedup. As the input image resolution exceeds 2048, MV-2FFTv approaches GPU computation speed. Additionally, two scenarios were tested and analyzed for energy efficiency, revealing that cube units of the NPU are more energy efficient. The vector and CPU units are better suited for sparse matrix multiplication and small-scale inputs, respectively. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Wearable Computing Techniques and Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Huawei DaVinci architecture.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flowchart of the MV-2FFT algorithm and Cooley-Tukey algorithm: (<b>a</b>) MV-2FFT algorithm and (<b>b</b>) Cooley-Tukey algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Software flow chart of the edge filter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Time consumption of different algorithms with different input scales.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Entire board of energy consumption.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Energy consumption of single execution in continuous test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Entire board of energy consumption in the periodic test.</p>
Full article ">
28 pages, 30401 KiB  
Article
In Situ Calibration and Trajectory Enhancement of UAV and Backpack LiDAR Systems for Fine-Resolution Forest Inventory
by Tian Zhou, Radhika Ravi, Yi-Chun Lin, Raja Manish, Songlin Fei and Ayman Habib
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(11), 2799; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15112799 - 28 May 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 1982
Abstract
Forest inventory has been relying on labor-intensive manual measurements. Using remote sensing modalities for forest inventory has gained increasing attention in the last few decades. However, tools for deriving accurate tree-level metrics are limited. This paper investigates the feasibility of using LiDAR units [...] Read more.
Forest inventory has been relying on labor-intensive manual measurements. Using remote sensing modalities for forest inventory has gained increasing attention in the last few decades. However, tools for deriving accurate tree-level metrics are limited. This paper investigates the feasibility of using LiDAR units onboard uncrewed aerial vehicle (UAV) and Backpack mobile mapping systems (MMSs) equipped with an integrated Global Navigation Satellite System/Inertial Navigation System (GNSS/INS) to provide high-quality point clouds for accurate, fine-resolution forest inventory. To improve the quality of the acquired point clouds, a system-driven strategy for mounting parameters estimation and trajectory enhancement using terrain patches and tree trunks is proposed. By minimizing observed discrepancies among conjugate features captured at different timestamps from multiple tracks by single/multiple systems, while considering the absolute and relative positional/rotational information provided by the GNSS/INS trajectory, system calibration parameters and trajectory information can be refined. Furthermore, some forest inventory metrics, such as tree trunk radius and orientation, are derived in the process. To evaluate the performance of the proposed strategy, three UAV and two Backpack datasets covering young and mature plantations were used in this study. Through sequential system calibration and trajectory enhancement, the spatial accuracy of the UAV point clouds improved from 20 cm to 5 cm. For the Backpack datasets, when the initial trajectory was of reasonable quality, conducting trajectory enhancement significantly improved the relative alignment of the point cloud from 30 cm to 3 cm, and an absolute accuracy at the 10 cm level can be achieved. For a lower-quality trajectory, the initial 1 m misalignment of the Backpack point cloud was reduced to 6 cm through trajectory enhancement. However, to derive products with accurate absolute accuracy, UAV point cloud is required as a reference in the trajectory enhancement process of the Backpack dataset. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Utilized mobile mapping systems and onboard sensors in this study: (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">UAV-1</span> system, (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">UAV-3</span> system, and (<b>c</b>) Backpack system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Two study sites at Martell Forest (Plot 115 and Plot 3b): (<b>a</b>) locations of the study sites and (<b>b</b>) removed and remaining trees after the thinning activity in Plot 115 during late February 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Top view of the trajectory for the two UAV and one Backpack datasets for young plantation overlaid on the point cloud (colored by height) captured in the <span class="html-italic">YP-UAV-2021</span> dataset.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Top view of the normalized height point cloud in the 1–3 m range for (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">YP-UAV-2021</span> and (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">YP-UAV-2022</span> datasets, as well as (<b>c</b>) a terrestrial image showing existing debris captured in the <span class="html-italic">YP-UAV-2022</span> dataset.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>A sample tree (colored by LiDAR range) in the <span class="html-italic">YP-UAV-2021</span> and <span class="html-italic">YP-UAV-2022</span> datasets viewed from the (<b>a</b>) X-Z and (<b>b</b>) Y-Z planes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Side view of a profile from the <span class="html-italic">YP-BP-2021</span> dataset (colored by time) for qualitative evaluation of the level of relative misalignment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Top view of the trajectory for the UAV and Backpack datasets for the mature plantation overlaid on the point cloud (colored by height) captured in the <span class="html-italic">MP-UAV-2023</span> dataset.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) A sample tree (colored by LiDAR range) in the <span class="html-italic">MP-UAV-2023</span> dataset and (<b>b</b>) side view of a profile from the <span class="html-italic">MP-BP-2023</span> dataset (colored by time) for qualitative evaluation of level of the relative misalignment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Proposed framework for system calibration and trajectory enhancement utilizing terrain patches and tree trunks.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Sample terrain patches derived from the point cloud (colored by time).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Minimum and maximum height thresholds used for tree-trunk extraction and sample cylindrical features (tree trunks) extracted from the point cloud (side view)—seed points for tree trunk segmentation are represented by small black squares.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Derived trajectory reference points (with a time interval <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>Δ</mo> <mi>T</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>) from the original high-frequency trajectory: <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>T</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> to <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>T</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mi>n</mi> <mo>−</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> denote the <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> closest reference points for a firing timestamp <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>T</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Geometric representation of feature parameters: (<b>a</b>) planar features and (<b>b</b>) cylindrical features.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>A sample tree in the original point clouds (in red), point clouds after system calibration (in blue), as well as point clouds after conducting system calibration and trajectory enhancement (in green): <span class="html-italic">YP-UAV-2021</span> dataset views along (<b>a</b>) X-Z and (<b>b</b>) Y-Z planes, <span class="html-italic">YP-UAV-2022</span> dataset views along (<b>c</b>) X-Z and (<b>d</b>) Y-Z planes, as well as <span class="html-italic">MP-UAV-2023</span> dataset views along (<b>e</b>) X-Z and (<b>f</b>) Y-Z planes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>A sample tree from the point clouds after sequential system calibration and trajectory enhancement for the <span class="html-italic">YP-UAV-2021</span> (in blue) and <span class="html-italic">YP-UAV-2022</span> (in green) datasets along the X-Z and Y-Z planes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Side view of sample profiles (colored by time) after trajectory enhancement depicting the alignment quality for: (<b>a</b>) the <span class="html-italic">YP-BP-2021</span> dataset, as well as the <span class="html-italic">MP-BP-2023</span> dataset from (<b>b</b>) Test 1 and (<b>c</b>) Test 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16 Cont.
<p>Side view of sample profiles (colored by time) after trajectory enhancement depicting the alignment quality for: (<b>a</b>) the <span class="html-italic">YP-BP-2021</span> dataset, as well as the <span class="html-italic">MP-BP-2023</span> dataset from (<b>b</b>) Test 1 and (<b>c</b>) Test 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Enhanced trajectory for the Backpack datasets colored by the magnitude of interpolated corrections for the position parameters (unadjusted trajectory points are colored in grey) overlaid on the study site’s point cloud (colored by height): (<b>a</b>) the <span class="html-italic">YP-BP-2021</span> dataset, as well as the <span class="html-italic">MP-BP-2023</span> dataset from (<b>b</b>) Test 1 and (<b>c</b>) Test 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>A sample tree in the Backpack point clouds after trajectory enhancement overlaid with the refined point cloud from respective UAV datasets (in red) along the X-Z and Y-Z planes: (<b>a</b>) the <span class="html-italic">YP-BP-2021</span> dataset, as well as the <span class="html-italic">MP-BP-2023</span> dataset from (<b>b</b>) Test 1 and (<b>c</b>) Test 2.</p>
Full article ">
37 pages, 19560 KiB  
Article
Geospatial Technologies Used in the Management of Water Resources in West of Romania
by Adrian Șmuleac, Laura Șmuleac, Cosmin Alin Popescu, Sorin Herban, Teodor Eugen Man, Florin Imbrea, Adina Horablaga, Simon Mihai, Raul Paşcalău and Tamas Safar
Water 2022, 14(22), 3729; https://doi.org/10.3390/w14223729 - 17 Nov 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1989
Abstract
Stability in time of major and important objectives is vital and can be achieved by 3D scanners which follow changes in time with construction, respective of the natural or artificial hydrotechnical dams and the obtaining of 3D data in real time with the [...] Read more.
Stability in time of major and important objectives is vital and can be achieved by 3D scanners which follow changes in time with construction, respective of the natural or artificial hydrotechnical dams and the obtaining of 3D data in real time with the possibility of evaluating and making quick decisions. This scientific paper approaches a research topic of great importance and actuality in the field of Civil Engineering, Hydrotechnics, and Geomatics using the 3D scanning technologies for the hydrotechnical arrangements (Topolovăţu Mic, Coșteiu and Sânmartinu Maghiar) and hydroameliorative (Cruceni Pumping Station). In Romania, data collection was carried out for the first time using the mobile scanning technology (MMS), “Backpack” type, namely, Leica Pegasus Backpack. Data collection using terrestrial laser scanning technology (Terrestrial Laser Scanning) was carried out with the Leica C10 equipment. The processing of point clouds was carried out using the Inertial Explorer program, and the processing of point clouds was carried out with the Cyclone program. The collection of ground checkpoints used for checking, correcting, and analyzing point clouds was carried out using the GPS Leica GS08 equipment. Compared with traditional methods using classical measuring instruments, precise data was obtained (with an error of 2–4 cm) through 3D laser scanning technology in a short time and with multiple possibilities of processing and visualizing point clouds. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Water Resources Management, Policy and Governance)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Leica Pegasus equipment (<a href="https://leica-geosystems.com/" target="_blank">https://leica-geosystems.com/</a> (accessed on 12 December 2021).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Planning the flight in the study area, with the indication of the flight bands followed by the UAV.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Mission type.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Fused SLAM Acquisition.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Initialization of the MMS equipment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Rinex data collection at one second ( Pumping Station, Cruceni, Romania).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Presentation of the checkpoints and trajectory for the scanned objectives.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Timiș-Bega interconnection—synoptic scheme (A.B.A. Banat).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Planning measurements: (<b>a</b>) Chart of GDOP Values Topolovăţu Mic; (<b>b</b>) Constellation and trajectory of the satellites for Topolovăţu Mic.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Height of satellites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Presentation of errors for the measurements performed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Alignment of images: (<b>a</b>) session I-a; (<b>b</b>) session II-a.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>DSM generated by photogrammetric technique.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Orthophotoplan obtained by aerial data processing, Topolovăţu Mic, Timiș, Romania.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Orthophotoplan obtained by processing aerial data: (<b>a</b>) Ortophotoplan ANCPI—2015 (Topolovăţu Mic, Timiș, Romania); (<b>b</b>) Ortopotoplan UAV—2018 (Topolovăţu Mic Hydrotechnical Node, Timiș, Romania).</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Point Cloud-NH Coșteiu.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Point Cloud-Sânmihaiu Român Lock.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Point Cloud-Sânmartinu Maghiar Lock.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Point Cloud-Cruceni Pumping Station.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>TruView link for NH Coșteiu.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>TruView link for NH Topolovăţu Mic.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>TruView link for the Lock from Sânmihaiu Român.</p>
Full article ">Figure 23
<p>TruView link for the Lock from Sânmartinu Maghiar.</p>
Full article ">Figure 24
<p>TruView link for Cruceni Pumping Station.</p>
Full article ">Figure 25
<p>View option in Inertial Explorer (IE).</p>
Full article ">Figure 26
<p>3D scanning of the HN Coșteiu—Museum lens on: 13.05.2019: (<b>a</b>) View of scan accuracy (Combined separation); (<b>b</b>) The number of visible satellites at the time of the scan; (<b>c</b>) RMS values; (<b>d</b>) PDOP values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 27
<p>3D scanning of the objective NH Costeiu–Dam on 15.05.2019: (<b>a</b>) View of scan accuracy (Combined separation); (<b>b</b>) The number of visible satellites at the time of the scan; (<b>c</b>) RMS values; (<b>d</b>) Estimation of data accuracy (X, Y, Z and Time).</p>
Full article ">Figure 28
<p>3D scanning of the objective CRUCENI PUMPING STATION on 03.06.2019: (<b>a</b>) View of scan accuracy (Combined separation); (<b>b</b>) The number of visible satellites at the time of the scan; (<b>c</b>) RMS values; (<b>d</b>) Estimation of data accuracy (X, Y, Z and Time).</p>
Full article ">Figure 29
<p>3D scanning of the objective HN SÂNMARTINU MAGHIAR on 23.07.2019: (<b>a</b>) View of scan accuracy (Combined separation); (<b>b</b>) The number of visible satellites at the time of the scan; (<b>c</b>) RMS values; (<b>d</b>) PDOP values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 30
<p>Fused SLAM Processing Workflow.</p>
Full article ">Figure 31
<p>Coșteiu Hydrotechnical Node, Timiș, Romania, scan performed on 15 May 2019: (<b>a</b>) The intensity of the LiDAR data nuance, the orthographic visualization; (<b>b</b>) The nuance intensity of the LiDAR data, 3D visualization; (<b>c</b>) LiDAR data coloured by altitude; (<b>d</b>) View point clouds (RGB).</p>
Full article ">Figure 32
<p>Cruceni pumping station, Timiș, Romania, scanning performed on 03 June 2019: (<b>a</b>) Intensity of the nuance of LiDAR data, orthographic visualization; (<b>b</b>) The nuance intensity of the LiDAR data, 3D visualization; (<b>c</b>) Coloring of point clouds after walks; (<b>d</b>) View point clouds (RGB).</p>
Full article ">Figure 33
<p>Sânmartinu Maghiar Lock, Timiș, Romania, scan performed on 23 July 2019: (<b>a</b>) The nuance intensity of the LiDAR data, orthographic visualization; (<b>b</b>) View point clouds (RGB); (<b>c</b>) LiDAR data coloured by altitude; (<b>d</b>) Coloring of point clouds after walks.</p>
Full article ">Figure 34
<p>View the LiDAR points on the stereographic image.</p>
Full article ">Figure 35
<p>Visualization of LiDAR data in the GIS environment, Cruceni pumping station.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 4744 KiB  
Article
Wireless Backpack System for Detection of Radioactive Cesium on Contaminated Soil Using Portable Plastic Scintillator with Efficient Readout Device
by Sujung Min, Kwang-Hoon Ko, Bumkyung Seo, JaeHak Cheong, Changhyun Roh and Sangbum Hong
Electronics 2021, 10(22), 2833; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10222833 - 18 Nov 2021
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2064
Abstract
The miniaturization and usability of radiation detectors make it increasingly possible to use mobile instruments to detect and monitor gamma radiations. Here, a Bluetooth-based mobile detection system for integrated interaction in a backpack was designed and implemented to smart equipment for the detection [...] Read more.
The miniaturization and usability of radiation detectors make it increasingly possible to use mobile instruments to detect and monitor gamma radiations. Here, a Bluetooth-based mobile detection system for integrated interaction in a backpack was designed and implemented to smart equipment for the detection of radioactive cesium on contaminated soil. The radiation measurement system was demonstrated in the form of a backpack using a quantum dot (QD)-loaded plastic scintillator manufactured and prepared directly in this study, and it can be measured by a person in the wireless framework of integrated interaction. The QD-loaded plastic scintillator was measured after setting the distance from the contaminated soil to 20, 50, and 100 mm. As a result, the detection efficiency of the commercial plastic scintillator (EJ-200) was calculated to be 11.81% and that of the QD-loaded plastic scintillator was 15.22%, which proved the higher detection efficiency performance than the commercial plastic scintillator. The measurement result was transmitted to a personal computer using Bluetooth as a portable system. In the future, this wireless system design could be expanded as a wireless communication system equipped with a global positioning system to detect and measure radioactively contaminated environments. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Microwave and Wireless Communications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The overall schematic illustrations of a wireless mobile system for the detection of radioactive cesium on contaminated soil. (<b>A</b>) Manufacturing of plastic scintillator and optical properties. (<b>B</b>) Radiological measurement using a contaminated soil plate and performance evaluation of QD-based plastic scintillator. (<b>C</b>) Manufacturing and application of mobile and wireless communication systems.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Manufacturing process of contaminated soil with <sup>137</sup>Cs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Absorption and transmittance measurement results of commercial plastics and CdS/ZnS-loaded plastic scintillators: (<b>a</b>) absorbance; (<b>b</b>) transmittance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Photoluminescence analysis of plastic scintillators by excitation wavelength (plastic thickness used is 30 mm): (<b>a</b>) excitation at 264 nm; (<b>b</b>) excitation at 316 nm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Schematic illustration of the plastic detector system. (<b>a</b>) Drawing of the plastic detector. (<b>b</b>) Detailed drawing of the detection part and signal-processing part. (<b>c</b>) Plastic detector size in detailed drawing.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Plastic scintillator-based wireless radiation measurement system. (<b>a</b>) Configuration of backpack-typed wireless system. (<b>b</b>) Components of plastic detection system and connection diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Measurement results using a commercial plastic scintillator (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) and CdS/ZnS-loaded plastic scintillator (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Comparison of measurement results and MCNP simulation results using 30-mm-thick plastic scintillator. (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) Comparison of results by distance with a source using a commercial scintillator. (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) Comparison of results by distance with a source using a CdS/ZnS-loaded scintillator.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Measurement results due to the distance from the contaminated soil sample using a CdS/ZnS-loaded plastic scintillator: (<b>a</b>) 30 mm thickness in a plastic scintillator; (<b>b</b>) 50 mm thickness in a plastic scintillator.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>(<b>a</b>) Wireless radiation detection system of the CdS/ZnS plastic scintillator and commercial plastic scintillator by soil source position (<b>b</b>) and detection efficiency.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 16554 KiB  
Article
Assessment of DSMs Using Backpack-Mounted Systems and Drone Techniques to Characterise Ancient Underground Cellars in the Duero Basin (Spain)
by Serafín López-Cuervo Medina, Enrique Pérez-Martín, Tomás R. Herrero Tejedor, Juan F. Prieto, Jesús Velasco, Miguel Ángel Conejo Martín, Alejandra Ezquerra-Canalejo and Julián Aguirre de Mata
Sensors 2019, 19(24), 5352; https://doi.org/10.3390/s19245352 - 4 Dec 2019
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3689
Abstract
In this study, a backpack-mounted 3D mobile scanning system and a fixed-wing drone (UAV) have been used to register terrain data on the same space. The study area is part of the ancient underground cellars in the Duero Basin. The aim of this [...] Read more.
In this study, a backpack-mounted 3D mobile scanning system and a fixed-wing drone (UAV) have been used to register terrain data on the same space. The study area is part of the ancient underground cellars in the Duero Basin. The aim of this work is to characterise the state of the roofs of these wine cellars by obtaining digital surface models (DSM) using the previously mentioned systems to detect any possible cases of collapse, using four geomatic products obtained with these systems. The results obtained from the process offer sufficient quality to generate valid DSMs in the study area or in a similar area. One limitation of the DSMs generated by backpack MMS is that the outcome depends on the distance of the points to the axis of the track and on the irregularities in the terrain. Specific parameters have been studied, such as the measuring distance from the scanning point in the laser scanner, the angle of incidence with regard to the ground, the surface vegetation, and any irregularities in the terrain. The registration speed and the high definition of the terrain offered by these systems produce a model that can be used to select the correct conservation priorities for this unique space. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the study area. The underground cellars are located in Atauta (Soria), a region in the Duero Basin in the north-central part of Spain.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Mavinci UAV used during the registration process. (<b>b</b>) Image orientation process task in Agisoft Photoscan<sup>®</sup> professional software (<a href="http://www.agisoft.com/" target="_blank">http://www.agisoft.com/</a>) showing flight paths and photocenters. (<b>c</b>) 3D view diagram of the recorded images.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) GPS Leica GX1230 GG equipment, acting as a reference base. (<b>b</b>) Pegasus backpack system for taking the point cloud in the study area before obtaining the DSM model to be assessed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>GEP observed using RTK-GPS techniques for the characterisation surveys of collapse zones. Lines depict the backpack mobile mapping tracks (Tracks A to F) used to assess the 3D model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Workflow of the methodology for data acquisition where (<b>1</b>) refers to data acquisition and post-processing for backpack mobile mapping, UAV, and RTK-GPS, and (<b>2</b>) represents DSM processing and stability evaluation. Note the interactions between the benchmark survey (GPS) and backpack mobile mapping and UAV surveys.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparison of precision based on the method used and the distance from the axis of backpack MMS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Distribution of the precise comparison of the point clouds based on the backpack MMS track. Letters denote the different tracks while numbers depict the different sections in the tracks.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Precision distribution with the influence of 7.5 m with regard to the backpack MMS track. Letters denote the different tracks while numbers depict the different sections in the tracks.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Identification of zones with significant differences between UAV and MMS DSMs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Differences in height according to the type of system, the width of the scan, and the obstacles or concealed elements. (<b>Left</b>): example of a zone with a 2.5 m track width. (<b>Right</b>): same area with a 15 m track width. Black areas depict concealed zones not registered in the backpack MMS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Comparison of UAV vs. backpack MMS by external tracks (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Comparison of UAV vs. backpack MMS by internal tracks (<b>C</b>–<b>F</b>).</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 15196 KiB  
Article
Application of Backpack-Mounted Mobile Mapping System and Rainfall–Runoff–Inundation Model for Flash Flood Analysis
by Takahiro Sayama, Koji Matsumoto, Yuji Kuwano and Kaoru Takara
Water 2019, 11(5), 963; https://doi.org/10.3390/w11050963 - 8 May 2019
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 4257
Abstract
Satellite remote sensing has been used effectively to estimate flood inundation extents in large river basins. In the case of flash floods in mountainous catchments, however, it is difficult to use remote sensing information. To compensate for this situation, detailed rainfall–runoff and flood [...] Read more.
Satellite remote sensing has been used effectively to estimate flood inundation extents in large river basins. In the case of flash floods in mountainous catchments, however, it is difficult to use remote sensing information. To compensate for this situation, detailed rainfall–runoff and flood inundation models have been utilized. Regardless of the recent technological advances in simulations, there has been a significant lack of data for validating such models, particularly with respect to local flood inundation depths. To estimate flood inundation depths, this study proposes using a backpack-mounted mobile mapping system (MMS) for post-flood surveys. Our case study in Northern Kyushu Island, which was affected by devastating flash floods in July 2017, suggests that the MMS can be used to estimate the inundation depth with an accuracy of 0.14 m. Furthermore, the landform change due to deposition of sediments could be estimated by the MMS survey. By taking into consideration the change of topography, the rainfall–runoff–inundation (RRI) model could reasonably reproduce the flood inundation compared with the MMS measurements. Overall, this study demonstrates the effective application of the MMS and RRI model for flash flood analysis in mountainous river catchments. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Improving Flood Detection and Monitoring through Remote Sensing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Disaster affected area of Northern Kyushu Island, including the Shirakitani River Basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Cumulative rainfall distribution based on C- and X-band synthetic radar rainfall product (July 5 0:00 to July 6 0:00 in 2017). ▲ denotes the positions of our field survey for estimating the river geometry.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Situations of the flood disaster in the Shirakitani River Basin (as of March 25, 2018).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Leica Pegasus: External appearance of backpack (PB) (<a href="http://www.leica-geosystems.co.jp/jp/Leica-PegasusBackpack_106730.htm" target="_blank">http://www.leica-geosystems.co.jp/jp/Leica-PegasusBackpack_106730.htm</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Field survey using PB (September 12, 2017: Photograph by Mr. Yoshiaki Ishida).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Survey route (yellow line) in the Shirakitani River Basin (blue line).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Measurement data by PB (<b>Left</b>: Laser point cloud data colored with reflected intensity, <b>Right</b>: Stereo image).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Flood traces on sidewall of building.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Results of superimposing (<b>left</b>) the color of the image captured by the camera (<b>right</b>) on the laser point cloud.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Bird’s-eye view of the 3-dimensional image created from PB laser point cloud.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Topographical change estimated by PB and DEM before the disaster (positive values denote deposition and negative values denote erosion).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>(<b>a</b>) RRI model calibration with observed dam inflow at Terauchi Dam, (<b>b</b>) simulated water depths at the downstream of Shirakitani River.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>In the downstream part of the Shirakitani River basin: (<b>a</b>) Topographical change (Difference between the DEM by mobile mapping system (MMS) after the disaster and DEM by the Geographical Survey Institute before the disaster), maximum inundation depth distribution estimated by the RRI model (<b>b</b>) with the original DEM and (<b>c</b>) with the new DEM created by the PB analysis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Same as the <a href="#water-11-00963-f013" class="html-fig">Figure 13</a>, but with (<b>a</b>) original DEM and (<b>b</b>), (<b>c</b>) covering for the entire river basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Comparison of maximum inundation depths estimated by PB (black solid squares) and the rainfall–runoff–inundation (RRI) model (red circles) against the direct measurements.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop