[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (133)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = CALIPSO satellite

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
21 pages, 8807 KiB  
Article
Retrieval of Cloud Optical Thickness During Nighttime from FY-4B AGRI Using a Convolutional Neural Network
by Daozhen Xia, Dongzhi Zhao, Kailin Li, Zhongfeng Qiu, Jiayu Liu, Jiaye Luan, Si Chen, Biao Song, Yu Wang and Jingyuan Yang
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(5), 737; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17050737 - 20 Feb 2025
Viewed by 173
Abstract
Cloud optical thickness (COT) stands as a critical parameter governing the radiative properties of clouds. This study develops a convolutional neural network (CNN) model to retrieve the COT of single-layer non-precipitating clouds during nighttime using FY-4B satellite data. The model integrates multi-channel brightness, [...] Read more.
Cloud optical thickness (COT) stands as a critical parameter governing the radiative properties of clouds. This study develops a convolutional neural network (CNN) model to retrieve the COT of single-layer non-precipitating clouds during nighttime using FY-4B satellite data. The model integrates multi-channel brightness, temperature, and geographic and temporal features, without relying on auxiliary meteorological data, using the multi-point averaged 532 nm COT from CALIPSO as ground truth for training. Performance evaluation demonstrates robust retrieval accuracy, achieving coefficients of determination (R2) of 0.88 and 0.73 for satellite zenith angles (SAZAs) < 70° and >70°, respectively. Key advancements include the incorporation of temporal features, the Squeeze-and-Excitation (SE) module, and a multi-point averaging technique, each validated through ablation experiments to reduce bias and enhance stability. Meanwhile, a model error analysis experiment was conducted that further clarified the performance boundaries of the model. These findings underscore the model’s capability to retrieve the COT of single-layer non-precipitating clouds during nighttime with high precision. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic diagram of the CNN system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Division results of nighttime data with SOZA &gt; 87°and SAZA &lt; 70°.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Histogram distribution of the COT during nighttime.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Testing results analysis of the COT retrieval model under SAZA &lt; 70° conditions: (<b>a</b>) Scatter plot of retrieved compared with true COT. (<b>b</b>) Histogram of COT value distribution. (<b>c</b>) Filtered error distribution (1% extreme errors removed).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Full-disk results for COT retrieval during nighttime from 15 January 2023, 12:00–15:00 (UTC). White areas represent regions with SOZA &lt; 87° or multi-layer or precipitating clouds. The red line is the dividing line with a SOZA of 87°.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>After removing the SE module, comparison of the COT retrieval model performance under different SAZA conditions and the impact of adding time features: (<b>a</b>,<b>d</b>,<b>g</b>,<b>j</b>) Scatter plot of retrieved compared with true COT; (<b>b</b>,<b>e</b>,<b>h</b>,<b>k</b>) histograms of COT value distribution; (<b>c</b>,<b>f</b>,<b>i</b>,<b>l</b>) error distribution plot (1% extreme errors removed).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The monthly mean daily and hourly variations with and without time features under SAZA &lt; 70° conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The monthly mean daily and hourly variations with and without time features under SAZA &gt; 70° conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparison of the COT retrieval model performance under different SAZA conditions and the impact of adding the SE module: (<b>a</b>,<b>d</b>,<b>g</b>,<b>j</b>) scatter plot of retrieved compared with true COT; (<b>b</b>,<b>e</b>,<b>h</b>,<b>k</b>) histogram of COT value distribution; (<b>c</b>,<b>f</b>,<b>i</b>,<b>l</b>) error distribution plot (1% extreme errors removed).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Comparison chart of input channel weights.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Comparison of COT retrieval model performance under different SAZA conditions and the impact of points used for training: (<b>a</b>,<b>d</b>,<b>g</b>,<b>j</b>) scatter plot of retrieved compared with true COT; (<b>b</b>,<b>e</b>,<b>h</b>,<b>k</b>) histogram of COT value distribution; (<b>c</b>,<b>f</b>,<b>i</b>,<b>l</b>) error distribution plot (1% extreme errors removed).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Comparison of COT distribution ranges.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Relationships between cloud optical thickness (COT), RMSE, and full attenuation probability. The bar chart represents RMSE variations for SAZA &gt; 70° (blue) and SAZA &lt; 70° (red), while the black curve shows the probability of full attenuation as COT increases.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 28423 KiB  
Article
Optical–Physical Characteristics of Low Clouds and Aerosols in South America Based on Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation
by Bo Su, Dekai Lin, Ziji Liu, Qingyan Wu, Wenkai Song and Miao Zhang
Atmosphere 2024, 15(12), 1513; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15121513 - 17 Dec 2024
Viewed by 575
Abstract
Clouds and aerosols, as important factors in the Earth’s climate system, have significant impacts on the atmospheric environment and global climate. This study investigated the optical and physical properties of clouds and aerosols over South America from 2006 to 2021 using CALIPSO Level [...] Read more.
Clouds and aerosols, as important factors in the Earth’s climate system, have significant impacts on the atmospheric environment and global climate. This study investigated the optical and physical properties of clouds and aerosols over South America from 2006 to 2021 using CALIPSO Level 2 products. South America was divided into four regions: A (Western Andean Mountains), B (Northern Orinoco and Amazon plains), C (Southern La Plata Plains), and D (Eastern Brazilian Highlands). Seasonal variations in the optical properties of low clouds and their interactions with the lowest-layer aerosols were analyzed and compared. The results indicate that Region C had the highest OPlc (probability of low clouds) and AODlc (AOD (Aerosol Optical Depth) of low clouds, likely due to its flat terrain and westerly influences. Both AODlc and OPlc were higher in September–November compared to other seasons. DRlc (depolarization ratio of low clouds) values were higher in Regions C and D, particularly in September–February, possibly due to topographic effects and more precipitation and higher humidity during this period. The elevated CRlc (color ratio of low clouds) in Region A may be attributed to the Andes blocking warm, moist air, leading to increased precipitation and cloud particle content. HLlc (top height of low clouds) and BLlc (base altitude of low clouds) were positively correlated with geographic elevation, while Tlc (thickness of low clouds) was greater at night, potentially due to enhanced atmospheric stability. Furthermore, strong correlations among certain parameters suggested significant interactions between aerosols and clouds. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Atmospheric Techniques, Instruments, and Modeling)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The geographical location and zoning of South America. The color bar represents the altitude (elevation). Divided into four regions: A, B, C, and D.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Seasonal spatial distribution of probability of occurrence of low clouds (OP<sub>lc</sub>), AOD of low clouds (AOD<sub>lc</sub>), percentage of AOD for low clouds (PAOD<sub>lc</sub>), and depolarization ratio of low clouds (DR<sub>lc</sub>) over South America during the day.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Seasonal spatial distributions of OP<sub>lc</sub>, AOD<sub>lc</sub>, PAOD<sub>lc</sub>, and DR<sub>lc</sub> over South America at night.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Seasonal variation of AOD<sub>lc</sub>, PAOD<sub>lc</sub>, and DR<sub>lc</sub> over South America during the day and at night ((<b>a</b>) AOD<sub>lc</sub> daytime; (<b>b</b>) PAOD<sub>lc</sub> daytime; (<b>c</b>) DR<sub>lc</sub> daytime; (<b>d</b>) AOD<sub>lc</sub> nighttime; (<b>e</b>) PAOD<sub>lc</sub> nighttime; (<b>f</b>) DR<sub>lc</sub> nighttime).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Seasonal spatial distributions of the probability of color ratio of low clouds (CR<sub>lc</sub>), base altitude of low clouds (B<sub>lc</sub>), top height of low clouds (H<sub>lc</sub>), and thickness of low clouds (T<sub>lc</sub>) over South America during the day.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Seasonal spatial distributions of CR<sub>lc</sub>, B<sub>lc</sub>, H<sub>lc</sub>, and T<sub>lc</sub> over South America at night.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Seasonal variation in CR<sub>lc</sub>, B<sub>lc</sub>, H<sub>lc</sub>, and T<sub>lc</sub> over South America during the day and at night ((<b>a</b>) CR<sub>lc</sub> daytime; (<b>b</b>) B<sub>lc</sub> daytime; (<b>c</b>) H<sub>lc</sub> daytime; (<b>d</b>) T<sub>lc</sub> nighttime; (<b>e</b>) CR<sub>lc</sub> nighttime; (<b>f</b>) B<sub>lc</sub> nighttime; (<b>g</b>) H<sub>lc</sub> nighttime; (<b>h</b>) T<sub>lc</sub> nighttime).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Correlation of PAOD<sub>lc</sub> and AOD<sub>lc</sub> over South America from 2006 to 2021: (<b>a</b>) MMA daytime; (<b>b</b>) JJA daytime; (<b>c</b>) SON daytime; (<b>d</b>) DJF nighttime; (<b>e</b>) MMA nighttime; (<b>f</b>) JJA nighttime; (<b>g</b>) SON nighttime; (<b>h</b>) DJF nighttime.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Correlation of Tlc and Hlc over South America from 2006 to 2021: (<b>a</b>) MMA daytime; (<b>b</b>) JJA daytime; (<b>c</b>) SON daytime; (<b>d</b>) DJF nighttime; (<b>e</b>) MMA nighttime; (<b>f</b>) JJA nighttime; (<b>g</b>) SON nighttime; (<b>h</b>) DJF nighttime.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Correlation of B<sub>lc</sub> and H<sub>lc</sub> over South America from 2006 to 2021: (<b>a</b>) MMA daytime; (<b>b</b>) winter daytime; (<b>c</b>) SON daytime; (<b>d</b>) DJF nighttime; (<b>e</b>) MMA nighttime; (<b>f</b>) JJA nighttime; (<b>g</b>) SON nighttime; (<b>h</b>) DJF nighttime.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Correlation of B<sub>lc</sub> and DR<sub>lc</sub> over South America from 2006 to 2021: (<b>a</b>) MMA daytime; (<b>b</b>) JJA daytime; (<b>c</b>) SON daytime; (<b>d</b>) DJF nighttime; (<b>e</b>) MMA nighttime; (<b>f</b>) JJA nighttime; (<b>g</b>) SON nighttime; (<b>h</b>) DJF nighttime.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Correlation of AODR<sub>lc</sub> and DR<sub>lc</sub> over South America from 2006 to 2021: (<b>a</b>) MMA daytime; (<b>b</b>) JJA daytime; (<b>c</b>) SON daytime; (<b>d</b>) DJF nighttime; (<b>e</b>) MMA nighttime; (<b>f</b>) JJA nighttime; (<b>g</b>) SON nighttime; (<b>h</b>) DJF nighttime.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Correlation of PAODR<sub>lc</sub> and DR<sub>lc</sub> over South America from 2006 to 2021: (<b>a</b>) MMA daytime; (<b>b</b>) JJA daytime; (<b>c</b>) SON daytime; (<b>d</b>) DJF nighttime; (<b>e</b>) MMA nighttime; (<b>f</b>) JJA nighttime; (<b>g</b>) SON nighttime; (<b>h</b>) DJF nighttime.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Correlation of B<sub>la</sub> and B<sub>lc</sub> over South America from 2006 to 2021: (<b>a</b>) MMA daytime; (<b>b</b>) JJA daytime; (<b>c</b>) SON daytime; (<b>d</b>) DJF nighttime; (<b>e</b>) MMA nighttime; (<b>f</b>) JJA nighttime; (<b>g</b>) SON nighttime; (<b>h</b>) DJF nighttime.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Correlation of H<sub>la</sub> and H<sub>lc</sub> over South America from 2006 to 2021: (<b>a</b>) MMA daytime; (<b>b</b>) JJA daytime; (<b>c</b>) SON daytime; (<b>d</b>) DJF nighttime; (<b>e</b>) MMA nighttime; (<b>f</b>) JJA nighttime; (<b>g</b>) SON nighttime; (<b>h</b>) DJF nighttime.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Correlation of T<sub>la</sub> and T<sub>lc</sub> over South America from 2006 to 2021: (<b>a</b>) MMA daytime; (<b>b</b>) JJA daytime; (<b>c</b>) SON daytime; (<b>d</b>) DJF nighttime; (<b>e</b>) MMA nighttime; (<b>f</b>) JJA nighttime; (<b>g</b>) SON nighttime; (<b>h</b>) DJF nighttime.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Correlation of PAOD<sub>la</sub> and PAOD<sub>lc</sub> over South America from 2006 to 2021: (<b>a</b>) MMA daytime; (<b>b</b>) JJA daytime; (<b>c</b>) SON daytime; (<b>d</b>) DJF nighttime; (<b>e</b>) MMA nighttime; (<b>f</b>) JJA nighttime; (<b>g</b>) SON nighttime; (<b>h</b>) DJF nighttime.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 13773 KiB  
Article
Comparison and Analysis of CALIPSO Aerosol Optical Depth and AERONET Aerosol Optical Depth Products in Asia from 2006 to 2023
by Yinan Zhao, Qingxin Tang, Zhenting Hu, Quanzhou Yu and Tianquan Liang
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(23), 4359; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16234359 - 22 Nov 2024
Viewed by 742
Abstract
Aerosol optical depth (AOD) serves as a significant parameter in aerosol research. With the increasing utilization of satellite data in AOD research, it is crucial to evaluate the satellite AOD data. Using Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) in situ measurements, this study investigates the [...] Read more.
Aerosol optical depth (AOD) serves as a significant parameter in aerosol research. With the increasing utilization of satellite data in AOD research, it is crucial to evaluate the satellite AOD data. Using Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) in situ measurements, this study investigates the accuracy and applicability of Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) AOD data in Asia from June 2006 to June 2023. By matching the CALIPSO AOD data in a 1° × 1° area around the selected AERONET sites, various statistical metrics were used to create a comprehensive evaluation system. The results show that: (1) There is a high correlation between the AODs of CALIPSO and AERONET (R = 0.636), and the AOD values of CALIPSO are only 1.7% higher than those of AERONET on average. The MAE (0.215) and RMSE (0.358) suggest that the error level of CALIPSO AOD is relatively low; (2) In most of the 25 sites throughout Asia CALIPSO AOD have high matching accuracies with the AERONET AOD, and only in three sites has a validation accuracy of ‘Poor’; (3) The accuracy varies across the four seasons, ranked as follows: winter demonstrates the highest accuracy, followed by autumn, spring, and summer; (4) The accuracy varies with surface elevation, with better matching in lowest altitude (<50 m) and high altitude (>500 m) areas, but slightly worse matching in medium altitude (200–500 m) areas and low altitude (50–200 m). The uncertainty in the CALIPSO AOD retrievals varies in seasons, altitudes, and aerosol characteristics. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) The geographical positioning of the study region is illustrated on a global map. (<b>b</b>) Topography and major countries and (<b>c</b>) distribution of various climate classifications and the positioning of AERONET sites [<a href="#B30-remotesensing-16-04359" class="html-bibr">30</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Box plots of AOD differences between CALIPSO and AERONET data. (The box and whiskers denote the 5, 25, 50, 75, and 95 percentiles, with a gray solid line at the median and a gray dashed line at the mean. The sphere represents the value of AOD).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Overall accuracy of CALIPSO.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Accuracy of CALIPSO AOD at each site. (<b>a</b>) R, (<b>b</b>) RMB, (<b>c</b>) MAE, (<b>d</b>) RMSE and (<b>e</b>) Accuracy.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Box plots of AOD differences between CALIPSO and AERONET data in different seasons. (The box and whiskers denote the 5, 25, 50, 75, and 95 percentiles, with a gray solid line at the median and a gray dashed line at the mean. The sphere represents the value of AOD).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>An evaluation of the accuracy of CALIPSO relative to AERONET measurements in (<b>a</b>) MAM, (<b>b</b>) JJA, (<b>c</b>) SON, and (<b>d</b>) DJF.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Monthly variations of R, RMB, MAE, and RMSE based on all matching points.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The accuracy of CALIPSO AOD at different elevation gradients.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 4382 KiB  
Article
Investigations on Stubble-Burning Aerosols over a Rural Location Using Ground-Based, Model, and Spaceborne Data
by Katta Vijayakumar, Panuganti China Sattilingam Devara and Saurabh Yadav
Atmosphere 2024, 15(11), 1383; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15111383 - 17 Nov 2024
Viewed by 815
Abstract
Agriculture crop residue burning has become a major environmental problem facing the Indo-Gangetic plain, as well as contributing to global warming. This paper reports the results of a comprehensive study, examining the variations in aerosol optical, microphysical, and radiative properties that occur during [...] Read more.
Agriculture crop residue burning has become a major environmental problem facing the Indo-Gangetic plain, as well as contributing to global warming. This paper reports the results of a comprehensive study, examining the variations in aerosol optical, microphysical, and radiative properties that occur during biomass-burning events at Amity University Haryana (AUH), at a rural station in Gurugram (Latitude: 28.31° N, Longitude: 76.90° E, 285 m AMSL), employing ground-based observations of AERONET and Aethalometer, as well as satellite and model simulations during 7–16 November 2021. The smoke emissions during the burning events enhanced the aerosol optical depth (AOD) and increased the Angstrom exponent (AE), suggesting the dominance of fine-mode aerosols. A smoke event that affected the study region on 11 November 2021 is simulated using the regional NAAPS model to assess the role of smoke in regional aerosol loading that caused an atmospheric forcing of 230.4 W/m2. The higher values of BC (black carbon) and BB (biomass burning), and lower values of AAE (absorption Angstrom exponent) are also observed during the peak intensity of the smoke-event period. A notable layer of smoke has been observed, extending from the surface up to an altitude of approximately 3 km. In addition, the observations gathered from CALIPSO regarding the vertical profiles of aerosols show a qualitative agreement with the values obtained from AERONET observations. Further, the smoke plumes that arose due to transport of a wide-spread agricultural crop residue burning are observed nationwide, as shown by MODIS imagery, and HYSPLIT back trajectories. Thus, the present study highlights that the smoke aerosol emissions during crop residue burning occasions play a critical role in the local/regional aerosol microphysical and radiation properties, and hence in the climate variability. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The MODIS-Aqua satellite true color image of fires over Punjab state on 11 November 2021. Here, the red color indicates fire detection using VIIRS satellite and the blue-colored star mark indicates the observational site Gurgaon (Amity University).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Day-to-day variation in AOD at different wavelengths (nm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Day-to-day variation in the AERONET (<b>a</b>) fine-mode and coarse-mode AOD at 500 nm; (<b>b</b>) Ångström exponent a in the spectral band 440–870 nm; and (<b>c</b>) fine-mode fraction at 500 nm over the experimental site. The vertical bars show one standard deviation from the mean area-averaged value.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Time evolution of aerosol volume size distribution for different aerosol radius (in um) over observation site from 7 to 16 November 2021.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Day-to-day variation in SSA at all wavelengths. The vertical bars show one standard deviation from the mean area-averaged value.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Day-to-day variation in Aerosol Radiative Forcing (ARF).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Daily mean variation in (<b>a</b>) BC mass concentration and absorption Ångström exponent (AAE); and (<b>b</b>) biomass burning (BB%) during smoke event period.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The concentration of smoke at the surface on 11 November 2021 during 00:00, 06:00, 12:00, and 18:00 h UTC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a</b>) CALIPSO retrieved the aerosol classification (sub-type profile), and (<b>b</b>) vertical feature mask on 11 November 2021 over the studied region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>(<b>a</b>) Active true color image on 11 November 2021. (<b>b</b>) NOAA HYSPLIT hourly backward trajectories ending at Amity University Haryana (AUH), India on 11 November 2021.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 5358 KiB  
Article
Analysis of Macro- and Microphysical Characteristics of Ice Clouds over the Tibetan Plateau Using CloudSat/CALIPSO Data
by Yating Guan, Xin Wang, Juan Huo, Zhihua Zhang, Minzheng Duan and Xuemei Zong
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(21), 3983; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16213983 - 26 Oct 2024
Viewed by 809
Abstract
Utilizing CloudSat/CALIPSO satellite data and ERA5 reanalysis data from 2007 to 2016, this study analyzed the distributions of optical and physical characteristics and change characteristics of ice clouds over the Tibetan Plateau (TP). The results show that the frequency of ice clouds in [...] Read more.
Utilizing CloudSat/CALIPSO satellite data and ERA5 reanalysis data from 2007 to 2016, this study analyzed the distributions of optical and physical characteristics and change characteristics of ice clouds over the Tibetan Plateau (TP). The results show that the frequency of ice clouds in the cold season (November to March) on the plateau is over 80%, while in the warm season (May to September) it is around 60%. The average cloud base height of ice clouds in the warm season is 3–5 km, and mostly around 2 km in the cold season. The average cloud top height in the warm season is around 5–8 km, while in the cold season it is mainly around 4.5 km. The average thickness of ice clouds in both seasons is around 2 km. The statistical results of microphysical characteristics show that the ice water content is around 10−1 to 103 mg/m3, and the effective radius of ice clouds is mainly in the range of 10–90 μm. Both have their highest frequency in the west of the TP and lowest in the northeast. A comprehensive analysis of the change in temperature, water vapor, and ice cloud occurrence frequency shows that the rate of increase in water vapor in the warm season is greater than that in the cold season, while the rates of increase in both surface temperature and ice cloud occurrence are smaller than in the cold season. The rate of increase in temperature in the warm season is around 0.038 °C/yr, and that in the cold season is around 0.095 °C/yr. The growth rate of thin ice clouds in the warm season is around 0.15% per year, while that in the cold season is as high as 1% per year. The results suggest that the surface temperature change may be related to the occurrence frequency of thin ice clouds, with the notable increase in temperature during the cold season possibly being associated with a significant increase in the occurrence frequency of thin ice clouds. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Regional division of the Tibetan Plateau.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Monthly variations in total cloud and ice cloud occurrence frequency over the TP in 2015.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Spatial distribution of relative ice cloud occurrence frequency in cold and warm seasons from 2007 to 2016.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Statistical distribution of ice cloud top height, base height, and thickness in various sub-region of the TP from 2007 to 2016 (A, western region; B, northeast region; C, southeast region).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Distribution of annual mean occurrence frequency count of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>L</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>I</mi> <mi>W</mi> <mi>C</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> with height in the (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) warm season and (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) cold season from 2007 to 2016. The white dotted lines in the figure represent the mean values at each height level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Distribution of annual mean occurrence frequency count of IER with height in the (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) warm season and (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) cold season from 2007 to 2016. The white dotted lines in the figure represent the mean values at each height level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Linear trends in surface temperature anomalies in the (<b>a</b>) warm season and (<b>b</b>) cold season, and their distribution in the (<b>c</b>) warm season and (<b>d</b>) cold season from 2007 to 2016.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Linear trends in water vapor content anomalies in the (<b>a</b>) warm season and (<b>b</b>) cold season, and their distribution in the (<b>c</b>) warm season and (<b>d</b>) cold season from 2007 to 2016.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Spatial variation trend in the relative occurrence frequency of thin ice clouds in the cold and warm seasons over the TP from 2007 to 2016.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Interannual variation in the occurrence frequency of thin ice clouds in the cold and warm seasons over the TP from 2007 to 2016.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Comparison of rates of change in temperature, water vapor, and ice clouds during the (<b>a</b>) warm and (<b>b</b>) cold seasons of the TP and each sub-region.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 12939 KiB  
Article
Dust Monitoring and Three-Dimensional Transport Characteristics of Dust Aerosol in Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei
by Siqin Zhang, Jianjun Wu, Jiaqi Yao, Xuefeng Quan, Haoran Zhai, Qingkai Lu, Haobin Xia, Mengran Wang and Jinquan Guo
Atmosphere 2024, 15(10), 1212; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15101212 - 10 Oct 2024
Viewed by 808
Abstract
Global dust events have become more frequent due to climate change and increased human activity, significantly impacting air quality and human health. Previous studies have mainly focused on determining atmospheric dust pollution levels through atmospheric parameter simulations or AOD values obtained from satellite [...] Read more.
Global dust events have become more frequent due to climate change and increased human activity, significantly impacting air quality and human health. Previous studies have mainly focused on determining atmospheric dust pollution levels through atmospheric parameter simulations or AOD values obtained from satellite remote sensing. However, research on the quantitative description of dust intensity and its cross-regional transport characteristics still faces numerous challenges. Therefore, this study utilized Fengyun-4A (FY-4A) satellite Advanced Geostationary Radiation Imager (AGRI) imagery, Cloud-Aerosol Lidar, and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) lidar, and other auxiliary data, to conduct three-dimensional spatiotemporal monitoring and a cross-regional transport analysis of two typical dust events in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH) region of China using four dust intensity indices Infrared Channel Shortwave Dust (Icsd), Dust Detection Index (DDI), dust value (DV), and Dust Strength Index (DSI)) and the HYSPLIT model. We found that among the four indices, DDI was the most suitable for studying dust in the BTH region, with a detection accuracy (POCD) of >88% at all times and reaching a maximum of 96.14%. Both the 2021 and 2023 dust events originated from large-scale deforestation in southern Mongolia and the border area of Inner Mongolia, with dust plumes distributed between 2 and 12 km being transported across regions to the BTH area. Further, when dust aerosols are primarily concentrated below 4 km and PM10 concentrations consistently exceed 600 µg/m3, large dust storms are more likely to occur in the BTH region. The findings of this study provide valuable insights into the sources, transport pathways, and environmental impacts of dust aerosols. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Aerosols)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Administrative map. (<b>a</b>) National 1 km DEM elevation map. (<b>b</b>) PM<sub>10</sub> monitoring station distribution in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region. (<b>c</b>) Bar chart of dust source management project construction in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region (2015–2019).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Technical flowchart.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Histogram of frequency distribution for thin clouds, thick clouds, and dust under four dust intensity indices.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Dust identification results in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region. AGRI true-color images for 15 March 2021, UTC 03:00–06:00 (<b>a<sub>1</sub></b>–<b>a<sub>4</sub></b>), and DDI distribution maps (<b>b<sub>1</sub></b>–<b>b<sub>4</sub></b>); AGRI true-color images for 22 March 2023, UTC 03:00–06:00 (<b>c<sub>1</sub></b>–<b>c<sub>4</sub></b>), and DDI distribution maps (<b>d<sub>1</sub></b>–<b>d<sub>4</sub></b>); DDI violin and boxplot statistics for 15 March 2021, and 22 March 2023, UTC 03:00–06:00 (<b>e</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>HYSPLIT backward trajectory simulations and FY-4A true-color images for the two dust events: (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Beijing backward trajectory simulation for 15 March 2021; (<b>d</b>,<b>e</b>) Beijing backward trajectory simulation for 22 March 2023; (<b>c</b>) an FY-4A true-color image for 15 March 2021, at UTC 04:00; (<b>f</b>) an FY-4A true-color image for 22 March 2023, at UTC 04:00.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Vertical distribution characteristics of aerosols and hourly changes in PM<sub>10</sub> concentration in the BTH and Inner Mongolia regions: 15 March 2021, BTH and Inner Mongolia regions (<b>a<sub>1</sub></b>–<b>a<sub>3</sub></b>, <b>b<sub>1</sub></b>–<b>b<sub>3</sub></b>); 21 March 2023, BTH and Inner Mongolia regions (<b>c<sub>1</sub></b>–<b>c<sub>3</sub></b>, <b>d<sub>1</sub></b>–<b>d<sub>3</sub></b>).</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 3356 KiB  
Article
The First Validation of Aerosol Optical Parameters Retrieved from the Terrestrial Ecosystem Carbon Inventory Satellite (TECIS) and Its Application
by Yijie Ren, Binglong Chen, Lingbing Bu, Gen Hu, Jingyi Fang and Pasindu Liyanage
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(19), 3689; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16193689 - 3 Oct 2024
Viewed by 742
Abstract
In August 2022, China successfully launched the Terrestrial Ecosystem Carbon Inventory Satellite (TECIS). The primary payload of this satellite is an onboard multi-beam lidar system, which is capable of observing aerosol optical parameters on a global scale. This pioneering study used the Fernald [...] Read more.
In August 2022, China successfully launched the Terrestrial Ecosystem Carbon Inventory Satellite (TECIS). The primary payload of this satellite is an onboard multi-beam lidar system, which is capable of observing aerosol optical parameters on a global scale. This pioneering study used the Fernald forward integration method to retrieve aerosol optical parameters based on the Level 2 data of the TECIS, including the aerosol depolarization ratio, aerosol backscatter coefficient, aerosol extinction coefficient, and aerosol optical depth (AOD). The validation of the TECIS-retrieved aerosol optical parameters was conducted using CALIPSO Level 1 and Level 2 data, with relative errors within 30%. A comparison of the AOD retrieved from the TECIS with the AERONET and MODIS AOD products yielded correlation coefficients greater than 0.7 and 0.6, respectively. The relative error of aerosol optical parameter profiles compared with ground-based measurements for CALIPSO was within 40%. Additionally, the correlation coefficients R2 with MODIS and AERONET AOD were approximately between 0.5 and 0.7, indicating the high accuracy of TECIS retrievals. Utilizing the TECIS retrieval results, combined with ground air quality monitoring data and HYSPLIT outcomes, a typical dust transport event was analyzed from 2 to 7 April 2023. The results indicate that dust was transported from the Taklamakan Desert in Xinjiang, China, to Henan and Anhui provinces, with a gradual decrease in the aerosol depolarization ratio and backscatter coefficient during the transport process, causing varying degrees of pollution in the downstream regions. This research verifies the accuracy of the retrieval algorithm through multi-source data comparison and demonstrates the potential application of the TECIS in the field of aerosol science for the first time. It enables the fine-scale regional monitoring of atmospheric aerosols and provides reliable data support for the three-dimensional distribution of global aerosols and related scientific applications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Atmospheric Remote Sensing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>A flowchart of the TECIS retrieval algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Trajectory of CALIPSO and TECIS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Total attenuated backscatter coefficient obtained from TECIS and CALIPSO. (<b>a</b>) TECIS, (<b>b</b>) CALIPSO.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>SNR of total attenuated backscatter coefficient obtained from TECIS and CALIPSO. (<b>a</b>) TECIS, (<b>b</b>) CALIPSO.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>A comparison of total attenuation backscatter coefficient mean profiles between the TECIS and CALIPSO at 13° to 14°N; the shaded area represents the standard deviation of the two satellites. The blue solid line represents the TECIS result, and the red solid line represents the CALIPSO result.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Profile of aerosol depolarization ratio of TECIS, (<b>b</b>) profile of aerosol depolarization ratio of CALIPSO, (<b>c</b>) profile of aerosol backscatter coefficient of TECIS, (<b>d</b>) profile of aerosol backscatter coefficient of CALIPSO, (<b>e</b>) profile of aerosol extinction coefficient of TECIS, (<b>f</b>) profile of aerosol extinction coefficient of CALIPSO.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>A comparison of aerosol optical parameter mean profiles between the TECIS and CALIPSO at 13° to 14°N, where the blue solid line represents the TECIS result, the red solid line represents the CALIPSO result, and the shaded area represents the standard deviation within the average range of the two satellites. (<b>a</b>) Aerosol depolarization ratio, (<b>b</b>) aerosol backscatter coefficient, (<b>c</b>) aerosol extinction coefficient.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Relative error of retrieval results between TECIS and CALIPSO.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>TECIS 532 nm AOD retrievals against AERONET AOD during April to June 2023; the dashed line is the linear fit described by the regression equation; the black line is the 1:1 line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>A scatterplot comparison of TECIS AOD data against MODIS AOD data during April to June 2023; the color scale represents the fraction of the total data. (<b>a</b>) North Africa, (<b>b</b>) the Middle East, (<b>c</b>) North America, (<b>d</b>) Central Asia.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>TECIS 1064 nm total attenuation backscattering coefficient and HYSPLIT backward tracking from 2 to 7 April 2023 (blue, red, and black represent backward tracking at heights of 3 km, 2 km, and 1 km, respectively).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Variations in PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations from 2 to 7 April 2023. (<b>a</b>) PM10, (<b>b</b>) PM2.5.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Optical parameters obtained by TECIS inversion from 2 to 7 April 2023. (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>,<b>e</b>,<b>g</b>,<b>i</b>,<b>k</b>) show backscattering coefficient; (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>,<b>f</b>,<b>h</b>,<b>j</b>,<b>l</b>) show depolarization ratio.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13 Cont.
<p>Optical parameters obtained by TECIS inversion from 2 to 7 April 2023. (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>,<b>e</b>,<b>g</b>,<b>i</b>,<b>k</b>) show backscattering coefficient; (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>,<b>f</b>,<b>h</b>,<b>j</b>,<b>l</b>) show depolarization ratio.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 4489 KiB  
Article
The Influences of Indian Monsoon Phases on Aerosol Distribution and Composition over India
by Pathan Imran Khan, Devanaboyina Venkata Ratnam, Perumal Prasad, Shaik Darga Saheb, Jonathan H. Jiang, Ghouse Basha, Pangaluru Kishore and Chanabasanagouda S. Patil
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(17), 3171; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16173171 - 27 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1087
Abstract
This study investigates the impacts of summer monsoon activity on aerosols over the Indian region. We analyze the variability of aerosols during active and break monsoon phases, as well as strong and weak monsoon years, using data from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer [...] Read more.
This study investigates the impacts of summer monsoon activity on aerosols over the Indian region. We analyze the variability of aerosols during active and break monsoon phases, as well as strong and weak monsoon years, using data from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and Cloud–Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO). Our findings show a clear distinction in aerosol distribution between active and break phases. During active phases, the Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) and aerosol extinction are lower across the Indian region, while break phases are associated with higher AOD and extinction. Furthermore, we observed a significant increase in AOD over Central India during strong monsoon years, compared to weak monsoon years. Utilizing the vertical feature mask (VFM) data from CALIPSO, we identified polluted dust and dusty marine aerosols as the dominant types during both active/break phases and strong/weak monsoon years. Notably, the contributions of these pollutants are significantly higher during break phases compared to during active phases. Our analysis also reveals a shift in the origin of these aerosol masses. During active phases, the majority originate from the Arabian Sea; in contrast, break phases are associated with a higher contribution from the African region. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Seasonal variability of Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD), observed using MODIS and averaged from 2001 to 2018: (<b>a</b>) winter (DJF), (<b>b</b>) pre-monsoon (MAM), (<b>c</b>) monsoon (JJA), and (<b>d</b>) post-monsoon (SON) seasons.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Spatial variability of AOD during (<b>a</b>) active and (<b>b</b>) break spells of Indian monsoon season.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Vertical variability of aerosol extinction, obtained from CALIPSO observations and averaged, from 2006 to 2018, for (<b>a</b>) active and (<b>b</b>) break days.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Aerosol types, obtained from CALIPSO vertical feature mask (VFM), during (<b>a</b>) active days (<b>b</b>) break days. Pie chart representing the percentages (%) of total aerosol sub-types observed between 0 and 8 km during (<b>c</b>) active days (<b>d</b>) break days over Indian region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>HYSPLIT 5-day backward mean trajectories during (<b>a</b>) active and (<b>b</b>) break days from 2001 to 2018.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Spatial variability of AOD during (<b>a</b>) strong monsoon and (<b>b</b>) weak monsoon years, and (<b>c</b>) differences between weak and strong monsoon years.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Vertical variability of aerosol extinction, obtained from CALIPSO observations and averaged, from 2006 to 2018 for (<b>a</b>) strong monsoon and (<b>b</b>) weak monsoon years.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Aerosol types obtained from CALIPSO vertical feature mask (VFM) during (<b>a</b>) strong monsoon and (<b>b</b>) weak monsoon years. Pie chart representing the percentages (%) of total aerosol sub-types observed between 0 and 8 km during (<b>c</b>) strong monsoon and (<b>d</b>) weak monsoon years over Indian region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>HYSPLIT 5-days backward mean trajectories during (<b>a</b>) strong monsoon (<b>b</b>) weak monsoon during 2001–2020.</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 15972 KiB  
Article
CACM-Net: Daytime Cloud Mask for AGRI Onboard the FY-4A Satellite
by Jingyuan Yang, Zhongfeng Qiu, Dongzhi Zhao, Biao Song, Jiayu Liu, Yu Wang, Kuo Liao and Kailin Li
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(14), 2660; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16142660 - 20 Jul 2024
Viewed by 851
Abstract
Accurate cloud detection is a crucial initial stage in optical satellite remote sensing. In this study, a daytime cloud mask model is proposed for the Advanced Geostationary Radiation Imager (AGRI) onboard the Fengyun 4A (FY-4A) satellite based on a deep learning approach. The [...] Read more.
Accurate cloud detection is a crucial initial stage in optical satellite remote sensing. In this study, a daytime cloud mask model is proposed for the Advanced Geostationary Radiation Imager (AGRI) onboard the Fengyun 4A (FY-4A) satellite based on a deep learning approach. The model, named “Convolutional and Attention-based Cloud Mask Net (CACM-Net)”, was trained using the 2021 dataset with CALIPSO data as the truth value. Two CACM-Net models were trained based on a satellite zenith angle (SZA) < 70° and >70°, respectively. The study evaluated the National Satellite Meteorological Center (NSMC) cloud mask product and compared it with the method established in this paper. The results indicate that CACM-Net outperforms the NSMC cloud mask product overall. Specifically, in the SZA < 70° subset, CACM-Net enhances accuracy, precision, and F1 score by 4.8%, 7.3%, and 3.6%, respectively, while reducing the false alarm rate (FAR) by approximately 7.3%. In the SZA > 70° section, improvements of 12.2%, 19.5%, and 8% in accuracy, precision, and F1 score, respectively, were observed, with a 19.5% reduction in FAR compared to NSMC. An independent validation dataset for January–June 2023 further validates the performance of CACM-Net. The results show improvements of 3.5%, 2.2%, and 2.8% in accuracy, precision, and F1 scores for SZA < 70° and 7.8%, 11.3%, and 4.8% for SZA > 70°, respectively, along with reductions in FAR. Cross-comparison with other satellite cloud mask products reveals high levels of agreement, with 88.6% and 86.3% matching results with the MODIS and Himawari-9 products, respectively. These results confirm the reliability of the CACM-Net cloud mask model, which can produce stable and high-quality FY-4A AGRI cloud mask results. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Coverage of all CALIPSO and AGRI matched points during daytime throughout 2021 and January–June 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic of the daytime SZA &gt; 70° and SZA &lt; 70° portions of FY-4A AGRI, with the green line indicating SZA = 70° and the red line indicating SZA = 70°.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Conceptual diagram of the structure of CACM-Net, which consists mainly of a training step and a prediction step, with the sizes of the input and output vectors shown at the bottom of the picture, representing the dimensional sizes of the channels, rows, and columns.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>CBAM block; the module has two consecutive submodules, namely the channel attention module and the spatial attention module. ⊗ denotes element-wise multiplication. The sizes of the input and output vectors are shown below the image, representing the dimensional sizes of the channels, rows, and columns.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Confusion matrix schematic.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Overall accuracy trend of CACM-Net cloud mask results and NSMC cloud mask product on the 2021 dataset. (<b>a</b>) CACM-Net cloud mask result. (<b>b</b>) NSMC cloud mask product.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Box plots of per-batch accuracy for the last epoch after convergence for all models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>CACM-Net training set data with rising and falling nodes showing cloud probability distributions. Vertical dashed lines indicate the probability thresholds that distinguish clear from probably clear (0.09), probably clear from probably cloudy (0.56), and probably cloudy from cloudy (0.87).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>CACM-Net (SZA &lt; 70°), CACM-Net (SZA &gt; 70°), and CACM-Net (Full) cloud mask evaluation metrics including accuracy, POD, precision, F1 score, and FAR referenced to the 2021 test dataset.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Schematic comparison of the results of CACM-Net and NSMC on 21 April 2021, 05:00 UTC. (<b>a</b>) Reflectance of 0.65 μm; (<b>b</b>) difference in cloud mask between CACM-Net and NSMC, where red pixels are mostly judged as cloudy by NSMC, blue pixels are mostly judged as cloudy by CACM-Net, and white pixels represent agreement between the models; (<b>c</b>) cloud mask results for CACM-Net; (<b>d</b>) Cloud mask results for NSMC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>CACM-Net cloud mask result, as well as NSMC cloud mask product evaluation metrics, including accuracy, POD, precision, and F1 score, (<b>a</b>) for the SZA &lt; 70° portion and (<b>b</b>) for the SZA &gt; 70° portion. (<b>c</b>) Comparison of the FAR metrics for the CACM-Net cloud mask result, as well as the NSMC cloud mask product, for the SZA &lt; 70° and SZA &gt; 70° portions using the 2023 test set data as a reference.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Overall accuracy trends for CACM-Net cloud mask results and NSMC cloud mask products on the 2023 independently validated dataset.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>A diagram showing the formation and dissipation of Typhoon Nanmadol from 13 September 2022 to 20 September 2022, with the red dot representing the center of the typhoon.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Schematic comparison of the results of CACM-Net and MODIS for 16 January 2023, 01:00 UTC (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>); (<b>a</b>) reflectance of 0.65 μm; (<b>b</b>) difference in cloud mask between CACM-Net and MODIS; (<b>c</b>) cloud mask results for CACM-Net; (<b>d</b>) cloud mask results for MODIS. Schematic comparison of the results of CACM-Net and Himawari 9 for 1 January 2023, 01:00 UTC (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>), (<b>e</b>) reflectance of 0.65 μm; (<b>f</b>) difference in cloud mask between CACM-Net and Himawari-9; (<b>g</b>) cloud mask results for CACM-Net; (<b>h</b>) cloud mask results for Himawari-9.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14 Cont.
<p>Schematic comparison of the results of CACM-Net and MODIS for 16 January 2023, 01:00 UTC (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>); (<b>a</b>) reflectance of 0.65 μm; (<b>b</b>) difference in cloud mask between CACM-Net and MODIS; (<b>c</b>) cloud mask results for CACM-Net; (<b>d</b>) cloud mask results for MODIS. Schematic comparison of the results of CACM-Net and Himawari 9 for 1 January 2023, 01:00 UTC (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>), (<b>e</b>) reflectance of 0.65 μm; (<b>f</b>) difference in cloud mask between CACM-Net and Himawari-9; (<b>g</b>) cloud mask results for CACM-Net; (<b>h</b>) cloud mask results for Himawari-9.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 14889 KiB  
Article
Random Forest Model-Based Inversion of Aerosol Vertical Profiles in China Using Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 Oxygen A-Band Observations
by Xiao-Qing Zhou, Hai-Lei Liu, Min-Zheng Duan, Bing Chen and Sheng-Lan Zhang
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(13), 2497; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16132497 - 8 Jul 2024
Viewed by 1221
Abstract
Aerosol research is important for the protection of the ecological environment, the improvement of air quality, and as a response to climate change. In this study, a random forest (RF) estimation model of aerosol optical depth (AOD) and extinction coefficient vertical profiles was, [...] Read more.
Aerosol research is important for the protection of the ecological environment, the improvement of air quality, and as a response to climate change. In this study, a random forest (RF) estimation model of aerosol optical depth (AOD) and extinction coefficient vertical profiles was, respectively, established using Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) oxygen-A band (O2 A-band) data from China and its surrounding areas in 2016, combined with geographical information (longitude, latitude, and elevation) and viewing angle data. To address the high number of OCO-2 O2 A-band channels, principal component analysis (PCA) was employed for dimensionality reduction. The model was then applied to estimate the aerosol extinction coefficients for the region in 2017, and its validity was verified by comparing the estimated values with the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) Level 2 extinction coefficients. In the comprehensive analysis of overall performance, an AOD model was initially constructed using variables, achieving a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.676. Subsequently, predictions for aerosol extinction coefficients were generated, revealing a satisfactory agreement between the predicted and the actual values in the vertical direction, with an R of 0.535 and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.107 km−1. Of the four seasons of the year, the model performs best in autumn (R = 0.557), while its performance was relatively lower in summer (R = 0.442). Height had a significant effect on the model, with both R and RMSE decreasing as height increased. Furthermore, the accuracy of aerosol profile inversion shows a dependence on AOD, with a better accuracy when AOD is less than 0.3 and RMSE can be less than 0.06 km−1. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Variation of CALIPSO extinction coefficient with height for China and neighboring regions (16.9–54.9°N, 72–136°E) in 2017. (<b>a</b>) Two-dimensional histogram of extinction coefficients with height; (<b>b</b>) the relationship figure of mean extinction coefficient and standard deviation with height.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Trajectories of matched data for Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIPSO) and Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) in 2016 (red) and 2017 (blue) using the nearest-neighbor method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Flowchart of the single-layer extinction coefficient random forest (RF) estimation model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Two-dimensional histogram for CALIPSO aerosol optical depth (AOD) versus estimated AOD; (<b>b</b>) distribution of errors in AOD estimated using CALIPSO and RF for different AOD ranges.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Two-dimensional histogram of the 2017 CALIPSO extinction coefficient versus the estimated extinction coefficient (the color bar on the right represents the density of the data points, with densities ranging from 50 to 2000).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Distribution of CALIPSO extinction coefficients; (<b>b</b>) distribution of estimated extinction coefficients (the colors of the bars represent the magnitude of the extinction coefficient).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6 Cont.
<p>(<b>a</b>) Distribution of CALIPSO extinction coefficients; (<b>b</b>) distribution of estimated extinction coefficients (the colors of the bars represent the magnitude of the extinction coefficient).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparison figure of RF estimates and CALIPSO aerosol extinction coefficient profiles as a function of height for individual observations (the CALIPSO aerosol extinction coefficients are primarily concentrated within the range of 0.1–0.3 km<sup>−1</sup>, with the total number of layers exceeding 30).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7 Cont.
<p>Comparison figure of RF estimates and CALIPSO aerosol extinction coefficient profiles as a function of height for individual observations (the CALIPSO aerosol extinction coefficients are primarily concentrated within the range of 0.1–0.3 km<sup>−1</sup>, with the total number of layers exceeding 30).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Quarterly averaged CALIPSO aerosol extinction coefficient profiles and estimated aerosol extinction coefficient profiles over China and surrounding areas for 2017 ((<b>a</b>) spring (March–May), (<b>b</b>) summer (June–August), (<b>c</b>) autumn (September–November), (<b>d</b>) winter (December–February)).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Within the height range of 0–6 km (categorized every 0.5 km), a comparative analysis of CALIPSO aerosol extinction coefficients and estimated extinction coefficients (<span class="html-italic">R</span>, RMSE, and bias) is conducted at different heights over China and surrounding areas for 2017.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Violin plots of CALIPSO aerosol extinction coefficients versus predicted extinction coefficients RMSE at different AOD concentrations (Condition 1: AOD ≤ 0.1, Condition 2: 0.1 &lt; AOD ≤ 0.3, Condition 3: AOD &gt; 0.3).</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 2941 KiB  
Article
Using HawkEye Level-2 Satellite Data for Remote Sensing Tasks in the Presence of Dust Aerosol
by Anna Papkova, Darya Kalinskaya and Evgeny Shybanov
Atmosphere 2024, 15(5), 617; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15050617 - 20 May 2024
Viewed by 1204
Abstract
This paper is the first to examine the operation of the HawkEye satellite in the presence of dust aerosol. The study region is the Black Sea. Dust transport dates were identified using visual inspection of satellite imagery, back-kinematic HYSPLIT trajectory analysis, CALIPSO aerosol [...] Read more.
This paper is the first to examine the operation of the HawkEye satellite in the presence of dust aerosol. The study region is the Black Sea. Dust transport dates were identified using visual inspection of satellite imagery, back-kinematic HYSPLIT trajectory analysis, CALIPSO aerosol stratification and typing maps, and the global forecasting model SILAM. In a comparative analysis of in-situ and satellite measurements of the remote sensing reflectance, an error in the atmospheric correction of HawkEye measurements was found both for a clean atmosphere and in the presence of an absorbing aerosol. It is shown that, on average, the dependence of the atmospheric correction error on wavelength has the form of a power function of the form from λ−3 to λ−9. The largest errors are in the short-wavelength region of the spectrum (412–443 nm) for the dust and dusty marine aerosol domination dates. A comparative analysis of satellite and in situ measurements of the optical characteristics of the atmosphere, namely the AOD and the Ångström parameter, was carried out. It is shown that the aerosol model used by HawkEye underestimates the Angström parameter and, most likely, large errors and outliers in satellite measurements are associated with this. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Optical Characteristics of Aerosol Pollution)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Satellite images of QuasiTrueColor VIIRS for the studied dates (source: <a href="https://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov/" target="_blank">https://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov/</a> [accessed on 15 April 2023]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The HYSPLIT 7-day back trajectories of airflow for the Black Sea region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2 Cont.
<p>The HYSPLIT 7-day back trajectories of airflow for the Black Sea region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>In situ and satellite values of Rrs(λ) for (<b>a</b>) 28 May 2021 (clear excess of satellite Rrs(λ)), (<b>b</b>) 28 July 2021 (dust aerosol with low satellite Rrs(λ)), (<b>c</b>) 17 August 2021 (satellite Rrs(λ) overestimated or underestimated).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Frequency distribution of satellite and in situ AERONET-OC stations values of the Ångström parameter for the Black Sea region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Remote sensing reflectance on 28 May 2021 for Galata_Platform station according to HawkEye (<b>a</b>) and Sentinel 3A (<b>b</b>) data.</p>
Full article ">
29 pages, 8442 KiB  
Article
Impact of Aerosols on the Macrophysical and Microphysical Characteristics of Ice-Phase and Mixed-Phase Clouds over the Tibetan Plateau
by Shizhen Zhu, Ling Qian, Xueqian Ma, Yujun Qiu, Jing Yang, Xin He, Junjun Li, Lei Zhu, Jing Gong and Chunsong Lu
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(10), 1781; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16101781 - 17 May 2024
Viewed by 1056
Abstract
Using CloudSat/CALIPSO satellite data and ERA5 reanalysis data from 2006 to 2010, the effects of aerosols on ice- and mixed-phase, single-layer, non-precipitating clouds over the Tibetan Plateau during nighttime in the MAM (March to May), JJA (June to August), SON (September to November), [...] Read more.
Using CloudSat/CALIPSO satellite data and ERA5 reanalysis data from 2006 to 2010, the effects of aerosols on ice- and mixed-phase, single-layer, non-precipitating clouds over the Tibetan Plateau during nighttime in the MAM (March to May), JJA (June to August), SON (September to November), and DJF (December to February) seasons were examined. The results indicated the following: (1) The macrophysical and microphysical characteristics of ice- and mixed-phase clouds exhibit a nonlinear trend with increasing aerosol optical depth (AOD). When the logarithm of AOD (lnAOD) was ≤−4.0, with increasing AOD during MAM and JJA nights, the cloud thickness and ice particle effective radius of ice-phase clouds and mixed-phase clouds, the ice water path and ice particle number concentration of ice-phase clouds, and the liquid water path and cloud fraction of mixed-phase clouds all decreased; during SON and DJF nights, the cloud thickness of ice-phase clouds, cloud top height, liquid droplet number concentration, and liquid water path of mixed-phase clouds all decreased. When the lnAOD was >−4.0, with increasing AOD during MAM and JJA nights, the cloud top height, cloud base height, cloud fraction, and ice particle number concentration of ice-phase clouds, and the ice water path of mixed-phase clouds all increased; during SON and DJF nights, the cloud fraction of mixed-phase clouds and the ice water path of ice-phase clouds all increased. (2) Under the condition of excluding meteorological factors, including the U-component of wind, V-component of wind, pressure vertical velocity, temperature, and relative humidity at the atmospheric pressure heights near the average cloud top height, within the cloud, and the average cloud base height, as well as precipitable water vapor, convective available potential energy, and surface pressure. During MAM and JJA nights. When the lnAOD was ≤−4.0, an increase in aerosols may have led to a decrease in the thickness of ice and mixed-phase cloud layers, as well as a reduction in cloud water path values. In contrast, when the lnAOD was >−4.0, an increase in aerosols may contribute to elevated cloud base and cloud top heights for ice-phase clouds. During SON and DJF nights, changes in various cloud characteristics may be influenced by both aerosols and meteorological factors. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Aerosols, Planetary Boundary Layer, and Clouds)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Topographic map of the Tibetan Plateau. The black solid line represents the 2 km topographic contour, which encloses the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Distribution of the total aerosol optical depth (Total AOD) and the ratio of different types of AOD to total AOD over the Tibetan Plateau for each season from 2006 to 2010, based on MERRA-2 data. (<b>a</b>) March to May (MAM), (<b>b</b>) June to August (JJA), (<b>c</b>) September to November (SON), (<b>d</b>) December to February (DJF) total AOD; (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>) ratio of dust (DU) aerosol optical depth to total AOD; (<b>i</b>–<b>l</b>) same as (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>) for sulfate (SU) aerosols; (<b>m</b>–<b>p</b>) same as (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>) for organic carbon (OC) aerosols; (<b>q</b>–<b>t</b>) same as (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>) for black carbon (BC) aerosols; (<b>u</b>–<b>x</b>) same as (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>) for sea salt (SS) aerosols. The black solid line represents the 2 km topographic contour.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Distribution of total cloud fraction (CF) and CF of different phases over the Tibetan Plateau for each season from 2006 to 2010 based on CloudSat data. (<b>a</b>) MAM, (<b>b</b>) JJA, (<b>c</b>) SON, (<b>d</b>) DJF total CF; (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>) same as (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) for ice-phase clouds; (<b>i</b>–<b>l</b>) same as (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) for mixed-phase clouds; (<b>m</b>–<b>p</b>) same as (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) for liquid-phase clouds. The black solid line represents the 2 km topographic contour.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Trends of macrophysical characteristics of single-layer non-precipitating ice-phase and mixed-phase clouds over the Tibetan Plateau during the nighttime in MAM and JJA within different logarithmic aerosol optical depth (lnAOD) intervals with changing lnAOD based on CloudSat and CALIPSO data: (<b>a</b>) cloud top height (CTH), (<b>b</b>) cloud base height (CBH), (<b>c</b>) cloud thickness (CT), (<b>d</b>) cloud fraction (CF). The error was calculated as <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mfrac> <mi>s</mi> <mrow> <msqrt> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>−</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msqrt> </mrow> </mfrac> </mrow> </semantics></math>, where n is the number of samples for each macrophysical characteristic within each lnAOD interval, and s is the standard deviation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Trends of macrophysical characteristics of single-layer non-precipitating ice-phase and mixed-phase clouds over the Tibetan Plateau during the nighttime in SON and DJF within different logarithmic aerosol optical depth (lnAOD) intervals with changing lnAOD based on CloudSat and CALIPSO data: (<b>a</b>) cloud top height (CTH), (<b>b</b>) cloud base height (CBH), (<b>c)</b> cloud thickness (CT), (<b>d</b>) cloud fraction (CF). The error was calculated as <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mfrac> <mi>s</mi> <mrow> <msqrt> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>−</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msqrt> </mrow> </mfrac> </mrow> </semantics></math>, where n is the number of samples for each macrophysical characteristic within each lnAOD interval, and s is the standard deviation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Trends of microphysical characteristics of single-layer non-precipitating ice-phase and mixed-phase clouds over the Tibetan Plateau during the nighttime in MAM and JJA within different logarithmic aerosol optical depth (lnAOD) intervals with changing lnAOD based on CloudSat and CALIPSO data: (<b>a</b>) ice particle effective radius (IER), (<b>b</b>) ice particle number concentration (INC), (<b>c)</b> ice water path (IWP), (<b>d</b>) liquid droplet effective radius (LER), (<b>e</b>) liquid droplet number concentration (LNC), and (<b>f</b>) liquid water path (LWP). The error was calculated as <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mfrac> <mi>s</mi> <mrow> <msqrt> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>−</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msqrt> </mrow> </mfrac> </mrow> </semantics></math>, where n is the number of samples for each macrophysical characteristic within each lnAOD interval, and s is the standard deviation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Trends of microphysical characteristics of single-layer non-precipitating ice-phase and mixed-phase clouds over the Tibetan Plateau during the nighttime in SON and DJF within different logarithmic aerosol optical depth (lnAOD) intervals with changing lnAOD based on CloudSat and CALIPSO data: (<b>a</b>) ice particle effective radius (IER), (<b>b</b>) ice particle number concentration (INC), (<b>c)</b> ice water path (IWP), (<b>d</b>) liquid droplet effective radius (LER), (<b>e</b>) liquid droplet number concentration (LNC), and (<b>f</b>) liquid water path (LWP). The error was calculated as <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mfrac> <mi>s</mi> <mrow> <msqrt> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>−</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msqrt> </mrow> </mfrac> </mrow> </semantics></math>, where n is the number of samples for each macrophysical characteristic within each lnAOD interval, and s is the standard deviation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Trends of meteorologic conditions for single-layer non-precipitating ice-phase and mixed-phase clouds over the Tibetan Plateau during the nighttime in MAM and JJA within different logarithmic aerosol optical depth (lnAOD) intervals with changing lnAOD based on ERA5 and CALIPSO data: (<b>a</b>) precipitable water vapor (PWV), (<b>b</b>) convective available potential energy (CAPE), (<b>c</b>) pressure vertical velocity (PVV) at 400 (500) hPa for ice-phase (mixed-phase) clouds (W<sub>400(500)</sub>). The error was calculated as <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mfrac> <mi>s</mi> <mrow> <msqrt> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>−</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msqrt> </mrow> </mfrac> </mrow> </semantics></math>, where n is the number of samples for each macrophysical characteristic within each lnAOD interval and s is the standard deviation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Trends of meteorologic conditions for single-layer non-precipitating ice-phase and mixed-phase clouds over the Tibetan Plateau during the nighttime in SON and DJF within different logarithmic aerosol optical depth (lnAOD) intervals with changing lnAOD based on ERA5 and CALIPSO data: (<b>a</b>) precipitable water vapor (PWV), (<b>b</b>) convective available potential energy (CAPE), (<b>c</b>) pressure vertical velocity (PVV) at 400 (500) hPa for ice-phase (mixed-phase) clouds (W<sub>400(500)</sub>). The error was calculated as <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mfrac> <mi>s</mi> <mrow> <msqrt> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>−</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msqrt> </mrow> </mfrac> </mrow> </semantics></math>, where n is the number of samples for each macrophysical characteristic within each lnAOD interval and s is the standard deviation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>During the nighttime in MAM and JJA over the Tibetan Plateau, for single-layer non-precipitating ice-phase and mixed-phase clouds under the conditions of logarithmic aerosol optical depth (lnAOD) ≤ −4.0 and lnAOD &gt; −4.0, the total correlation coefficients (column 1) between lnAOD and various macrophysical characteristics of clouds: (<b>a</b>) cloud top height (CTH), (<b>b</b>) cloud base height (CBH), (<b>c</b>) cloud thickness (CT), (<b>d</b>) cloud fraction (CF), and the partial correlation coefficients after individually (column 2–19) and simultaneously (column 20) removing the influence of 18 meteorological factors (the values in parentheses correspond to the mixed-phase clouds at specific pressures) based on CloudSat, CALIPSO, and ERA5 data, with * indicating passing the 95% significance test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>During the nighttime in SON and DJF over the Tibetan Plateau, for single-layer non-precipitating ice-phase and mixed-phase clouds under the conditions of logarithmic aerosol optical depth (lnAOD) ≤ −4.0 and lnAOD &gt; −4.0, the total correlation coefficients (column 1) between lnAOD and various macrophysical characteristics of clouds: (<b>a</b>) cloud top height (CTH), (<b>b</b>) cloud base height (CBH), (<b>c</b>) cloud thickness (CT), (<b>d</b>) cloud fraction (CF), and the partial correlation coefficients after individually (column 2–19) and simultaneously (column 20) removing the influence of 18 meteorological factors (the values in parentheses correspond to the mixed-phase clouds at specific pressures) based on CloudSat, CALIPSO, and ERA5 data, with * indicating passing the 95% significance test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>During the nighttime in MAM and JJA over the Tibetan Plateau, for single-layer non-precipitating ice-phase and mixed-phase clouds under the conditions of logarithmic aerosol optical depth (lnAOD) ≤ −4.0 and lnAOD &gt; −4.0, the total correlation coefficients (column 1) between lnAOD and various microphysical characteristics of clouds: (<b>a</b>) ice particle effective radius (IER), (<b>b</b>) ice particle number concentration (INC), (<b>c</b>) ice water path (IWP), (<b>d</b>) liquid droplet effective radius (LER), (<b>e</b>) liquid droplet number concentration (LNC), (<b>f</b>) liquid water path (LWP), and the partial correlation coefficients after individually (column 2–19) and simultaneously (column 20) removing the influence of 18 meteorological factors (the values in parentheses correspond to the mixed-phase clouds at specific pressures) based on CloudSat, CALIPSO, and ERA5 data, with * indicating passing the 95% significance test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>During the nighttime in SON and DJF over the Tibetan Plateau, for single-layer non-precipitating ice-phase and mixed-phase clouds under the conditions of logarithmic aerosol optical depth (lnAOD) ≤ −4.0 and lnAOD &gt; −4.0, the total correlation coefficients (column 1) between lnAOD and various microphysical characteristics of clouds: (<b>a</b>) ice particle effective radius (IER), (<b>b</b>) ice particle number concentration (INC), (<b>c</b>) ice water path (IWP), (<b>d</b>) liquid droplet effective radius (LER), (<b>e</b>) liquid droplet number concentration (LNC), (<b>f</b>) liquid water path (LWP), and the partial correlation coefficients after individually (column 2–19) and simultaneously (column 20) removing the influence of 18 meteorological factors (the values in parentheses correspond to the mixed-phase clouds at specific pressures) based on CloudSat, CALIPSO, and ERA5 data, with * indicating passing the 95% significance test.</p>
Full article ">
33 pages, 5439 KiB  
Article
Assessing Lidar Ratio Impact on CALIPSO Retrievals Utilized for the Estimation of Aerosol SW Radiative Effects across North Africa, the Middle East, and Europe
by Anna Moustaka, Marios-Bruno Korras-Carraca, Kyriakoula Papachristopoulou, Michael Stamatis, Ilias Fountoulakis, Stelios Kazadzis, Emmanouil Proestakis, Vassilis Amiridis, Kleareti Tourpali, Thanasis Georgiou, Stavros Solomos, Christos Spyrou, Christos Zerefos and Antonis Gkikas
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(10), 1689; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16101689 - 9 May 2024
Viewed by 1717
Abstract
North Africa, the Middle East, and Europe (NAMEE domain) host a variety of suspended particles characterized by different optical and microphysical properties. In the current study, we investigate the importance of the lidar ratio (LR) on Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization–Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and [...] Read more.
North Africa, the Middle East, and Europe (NAMEE domain) host a variety of suspended particles characterized by different optical and microphysical properties. In the current study, we investigate the importance of the lidar ratio (LR) on Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization–Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIOP-CALIPSO) aerosol retrievals towards assessing aerosols’ impact on the Earth-atmosphere radiation budget. A holistic approach has been adopted involving collocated Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) observations, Radiative Transfer Model (RTM) simulations, as well as reference radiation measurements acquired using spaceborne (Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System-CERES) and ground-based (Baseline Surface Radiation Network-BSRN) instruments. We are assessing the clear-sky shortwave (SW) direct radiative effects (DREs) on 550 atmospheric scenes, identified within the 2007–2020 period, in which the primary tropospheric aerosol species (dust, marine, polluted continental/smoke, elevated smoke, and clean continental) are probed using CALIPSO. RTM runs have been performed relying on CALIOP retrievals in which the default and the DeLiAn (Depolarization ratio, Lidar ratio, and Ångström exponent)-based aerosol-speciated LRs are considered. The simulated fields from both configurations are compared against those produced when AERONET AODs are applied. Overall, the DeLiAn LRs leads to better results mainly when mineral particles are either solely recorded or coexist with other aerosol species (e.g., sea-salt). In quantitative terms, the errors in DREs are reduced by ~26–27% at the surface (from 5.3 to 3.9 W/m2) and within the atmosphere (from −3.3 to −2.4 W/m2). The improvements become more significant (reaching up to ~35%) for moderate-to-high aerosol loads (AOD ≥ 0.2). Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) CALIPSO overpass near the El_Farafra AERONET station. The red line indicates the part of the orbit residing within a circle of 100 km radius centered at the ground site. (<b>b</b>) Curtain plots of the CALIPSO V4.2 aerosol subtype product (left panel) indicating the presence of pure dust (N/A: not an aerosol layer, 1: marine, 2: dust, 3: polluted continental/smoke, 4: clean continental, 5: polluted dust, 6: elevated smoke, 7: dusty marine, 8: PSC aerosol, 9: volcanic ash, 10: sulfate/other) and the backscatter coefficient 532 nm [km<sup>−1</sup>·sr<sup>−1</sup>] (central panel). Vertical profile of the spatially averaged extinction coefficient 532 nm (right panel) for the respective orbit, along with the corresponding columnar AODs based on the default CALIPSO (red) and the DeLiAn (green) LRs. The temporal averages of the AERONET AODs for four time windows (±15, ±30, ±45 and ±60) centered at the satellite overpasses.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>A schematic overview of the RTM setup.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Spectral signatures of the AERONET-based: (<b>a</b>) SSA, (<b>b</b>) ASYM and (<b>c</b>) AOD for dust (yellow), marine (cyan), elevated smoke (black), polluted continental/smoke (orange) and clean continental (green) aerosols as these have been identified from the CALIOP-CALIPSO spaceborne retrievals.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Scatterplots between spaceborne (CALIPSO; <span class="html-italic">y</span> axis) and ground-based (AERONET; <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis) AODs for: (<b>a</b>) the entire CALIPSO-AERONET collocated sample (550 cases) and (<b>b</b>) the matchups where moderate-to-high AODs (≥0.2) are measured at the AERONET stations (197 cases). The CALIPSO AODs are computed for the default CALIOP (red points) and the DeLiAn-based (green points) LRs. The correlation coefficient (r), the slope of the linear regression, the MBE, and the RMSE scores are provided.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Box-whisker plots (displaying the 90/10 percentile at the whiskers, the 75/25 percentiles at the boxes, and the median in the center line) of the AERONET (blue), the default CALIOP (red), and the DeLiAn-based (green) AODs under moderate-to-high aerosol load conditions (AERONET AODs ≥ 0.2) for dust (D), dust+marine (D + M), dust + polluted continental/smoke (D + P/S), the remaining possible combinations (Other), and for the entire sample (ALL; 197 cases).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Scatterplots between spaceborne (CALIPSO; <span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis) and ground-based (AERONET; <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis) DREs at the surface (NETSRFC), within the atmosphere (ATM) and at the top of the atmosphere (TOA) for the: (<b>a</b>) entire CALIPSO-AERONET collocated sample (550 cases) and (<b>b</b>) the matchups where moderate-to-high AERONET AODs (≥0.2) are measured (197 cases). The CALIPSO DREs are computed for the default CALIOP (red circles) and the DeLiAn-based (green circles) LRs. The background colors denote the warming (red) or cooling (blue) effect.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Box-whisker plots (displaying the 90/10 percentile at the whiskers, the 75/25 percentiles at the boxes, and the median in the center line) for the AERONET (blue boxes), the default CALIOP (red boxes), and the DeLiAn-based (green boxes) DREs at the surface (NETSRFC; upper panel), within the atmosphere (ATM, middle panel), and at the top of the atmosphere (TOA; bottom panel) for the entire AERONET-CALIPSO collocated sample (550 cases). The boxplots are presented separately for atmospheric scenes where dust (D), dust + polluted contintenal/smoke (D + P/S), dust + marine (D + M), marine (M), and polluted contintenal/smoke (P/S) are probed. Τhe remaining possible combinations and the entire sample are grouped in the “Other” and “ALL” categories. The background colors denote the warming (red) or cooling (blue) effect.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Scatterplots between AERONET (blue points), CALIOP (red points), and DeLiAn (green points) DREs (<span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis) (NETSRFC, ATM, TOA)) versus AERONET AODs (<span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis) for the entire CALIPSO-AERONET collocated sample (550 cases). The correlation coefficients (r) and the slopes for the linear regression lines are displayed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Box-whisker plots (displaying the 90/10 percentile at the whiskers, the 75/25 percentiles at the boxes, and the median in the center line) for the AERONET (blue boxes), the default CALIOP (red boxes) and the DeLiAn-based (green boxes) ARBEs at the surface (NETSRFC; upper panel), within the atmosphere (ATM, middle panel) and at the top of the atmosphere (TOA; bottom panel) for the entire AERONET-CALIPSO collocated sample (550 cases). The boxplots are presented separately for atmospheric scenes where dust (D), dust + polluted continental/smoke (D + P/S), dust + marine (D + M), marine (M) and polluted continental/smoke (P/S) are probed. The remaining possible combinations and the entire sample are grouped in the “Other” and “ALL” categories.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Scatterplots of the simulated TOA fluxes based on AERONET (blue), CALIPSO default (red), and DeLiAn (green) versus the measured values using CERES measurements for: (<b>a</b>) the 369 cases and (<b>b</b>) the cases when AERONET AOD ≥ 0.2. The correlation coefficients (r) and the slopes for the linear regression lines are displayed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Scatterplots of the simulated surface fluxes based on CALIPSO default (red points) and DeLiAn (green points) LR versus the measured values using BSRN stations for the collection of 35 case studies. The correlation coefficients (r) and the slopes for the linear regression lines are displayed.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Diurnal variation of the measured (DNI, GHI, GHI_STD) and the modelled (DNI, GHI) SW downwelling surface radiation at the Palaiseau (PAL) BSRN station under: (<b>a</b>) cloud-free and (<b>b</b>) cloudy conditions.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 4738 KiB  
Article
Trans-Boundary Dust Transport of Dust Storms in Northern China: A Study Utilizing Ground-Based Lidar Network and CALIPSO Satellite
by Zhisheng Zhang, Zhiqiang Kuang, Caixia Yu, Decheng Wu, Qibing Shi, Shuai Zhang, Zhenzhu Wang and Dong Liu
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(7), 1196; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16071196 - 29 Mar 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1563
Abstract
During 14–16 March 2021, a large-scale dust storm event occurred in the northern region of China, and it was considered the most intense event in the past decade. This study employs observation data for PM2.5 and PM10 from the air quality monitoring station, [...] Read more.
During 14–16 March 2021, a large-scale dust storm event occurred in the northern region of China, and it was considered the most intense event in the past decade. This study employs observation data for PM2.5 and PM10 from the air quality monitoring station, the HYSPLIT model, ground-based polarized Lidar networks, AGRI payload data from Fengyun satellites and CALIPSO satellite Lidar data to jointly explore and scrutinize the three-dimensional spatial and temporal characteristics of aerosol transport. Firstly, by integrating meteorological data for PM2.5 and PM10, the air quality is assessed across six stations within the Lidar network during the dust storm. Secondly, employing a backward trajectory tracking model, the study elucidates sources of dust at the Lidar network sites. Thirdly, deploying a newly devised portable infrared 1064 nm Lidar and a pulsed 532 nm Lidar, a ground-based Lidar observation network is established for vertical probing of transboundary dust transport within the observed region. Finally, by incorporating cloud imagery from Fengyun satellites and CALIPSO satellite Lidar data, this study revealed the classification of dust and the height distribution of dust layers at pertinent sites within the Lidar observation network. The findings affirm that the eastward movement and southward compression of the intensifying Mongolian cyclone led to severe dust storm weather in western and southern Mongolia, as well as Inner Mongolia, further transporting dust into northern, northwestern, and northeastern parts of China. This dust event wielded a substantial impact on a broad expanse in northern China, manifesting in localized dust storms in Inner Mongolia, Beijing, Gansu, and surrounding areas. In essence, the dust emanated from the deserts in Mongolia and northwest China, encompassing both deserts and the Gobi region. The amalgamation of ground-based and spaceborne Lidar observations conclusively establishes that the distribution height of dust in the source region ranged from 3 to 5 km. Influenced by high-pressure systems, the protracted transport of dust over extensive distances prompted a gradual reduction in its distribution height owing to sedimentation. The comprehensive analysis of pertinent research data and information collectively affirms the precision and efficacy of the three-dimensional aerosol monitoring conducted by the ground-based Lidar network within the region. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Distribution of Lidar Detection Sites and the CALIPSO transit trajectory (the yellow line).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Variations in PM2.5 and PM10 mass concentrations at six sites in China from 14 to 19 March 2021.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The 48 h HYSPLIT backward trajectory of different stations at different heights, Wuzhong (plane (<b>a</b>)), Xi’an (plane (<b>b</b>)), Beijing (plane (<b>c</b>)), Jinan (plane (<b>d</b>)), Handan (plane (<b>e</b>)), and Hefei (plane (<b>f</b>)).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Lidar range corrected signals and depolarization ratio signals at different sites in the Lidar network: Wuzhong (panel (<b>a</b>)), Xi’an (panel (<b>b</b>)), Beijing (panel (<b>c</b>)), Jinan (panel (<b>d</b>)), Handan (panel (<b>e</b>)), and Hefei (panel (<b>f</b>)).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4 Cont.
<p>Lidar range corrected signals and depolarization ratio signals at different sites in the Lidar network: Wuzhong (panel (<b>a</b>)), Xi’an (panel (<b>b</b>)), Beijing (panel (<b>c</b>)), Jinan (panel (<b>d</b>)), Handan (panel (<b>e</b>)), and Hefei (panel (<b>f</b>)).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Cloud images of the dust process captured by the Fengyun satellite on 14 March 2021, at 12:30 (plane (<b>a</b>)), 20:15 (plane (<b>b</b>)), 15 March at 8:15 (plane (<b>c</b>)), and 13:15 (plane (<b>d</b>)).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>CALIPSO transit trajectory on 16 March 2021.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>CALIOP data products on 16 March 2021: (<b>a</b>) Attenuated Backscatter Coefficient at 1064 nm wavelength, (<b>b</b>) vertical profile of aerosol classification.</p>
Full article ">
28 pages, 10814 KiB  
Article
Improving Dust Aerosol Optical Depth (DAOD) Retrieval from the GEOKOMPSAT-2A (GK-2A) Satellite for Daytime and Nighttime Monitoring
by Soi Ahn, Hyeon-Su Kim, Jae-Young Byon and Hancheol Lim
Sensors 2024, 24(5), 1490; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24051490 - 25 Feb 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1324
Abstract
The Advanced Meteorological Image (AMI) onboard GEOKOMPSAT 2A (GK-2A) enables the retrieval of dust aerosol optical depth (DAOD) from geostationary satellites using infrared (IR) channels. IR observations allow the retrieval of DAOD and the dust layer altitude (24 h) over surface properties, particularly [...] Read more.
The Advanced Meteorological Image (AMI) onboard GEOKOMPSAT 2A (GK-2A) enables the retrieval of dust aerosol optical depth (DAOD) from geostationary satellites using infrared (IR) channels. IR observations allow the retrieval of DAOD and the dust layer altitude (24 h) over surface properties, particularly over deserts. In this study, dust events in northeast Asia from 2020 to 2021 were investigated using five GK-2A thermal IR bands (8.7, 10.5, 11.4, 12.3, and 13.3 μm). For the dust cloud, the brightness temperature differences (BTDs) of 10.5 and 12.3 μm were consistently negative, while the BTD of 8.7 and 10.5 μm varied based on the dust intensity. This study exploited these optical properties to develop a physical approach for DAOD lookup tables (LUTs) using IR channels to retrieve the DAOD. To this end, the characteristics of thermal radiation transfer were simulated using the forward model; dust aerosols were explained by BTD (10.5, 12.3 μm)—an intrinsic characteristic of dust aerosol. The DAOD and dust properties were gained from a brightness temperature (BT) of 10.5 μm and BTD of 10.5, 12.3 μm. Additionally, the cumulative distribution function (CDF) was employed to strengthen the continuity of 24-h DAOD. The CDF was applied to the algorithm by calculating the conversion value coefficient for the DAOD error correction of the IR, with daytime visible aerosol optical depth as the true value. The results show that the DAOD product can be successfully applied during the daytime and nighttime to continuously monitor the flow of yellow dust from the GK-2A satellite in northeast Asia. In particular, the validation results for IR DAOD were similar to the active satellite product (CALIPSO/CALIOP) results, which exhibited a tendency similar to that for IR DAOD at night. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flowchart of the Dust Aerosol Optical Depth (DAOD) product algorithm used by GK-2A/AMI.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Simulation model results based on infrared channel characteristics by DISORT (1 model (red circle), 2 model (orange circle), 3 model (yellow inverted triangle), 4 model (green triangle), 5 model (sky blue square), 6 model (blue square), 7 model (purple rhombus), 8 model (burgundy rhombus), 9 model (orange triangle), 10 model (yellow green inverted triangle)).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Example of the look-up table calculated according to the variation in optical depth and effective radii of dust particles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Example of the yellow dust detection using GK-2A’s infrared channel threshold values at (<b>a</b>) 07:00 UTC; (<b>b</b>) 10:00 UTC; (<b>c</b>) 13:00 UTC; (<b>d</b>) 16:00 UTC; and (<b>e</b>) 19:00 (24 May 2020, 03:00 UTC–11:00 UTC, 2-h intervals).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Example of the yellow dust detection using GK-2A’s infrared channel threshold values at (<b>a</b>) 03:00 UTC; (<b>b</b>) 05:00 UTC; (<b>c</b>) 07:00 UTC; (<b>d</b>) 09:00 UTC; and (<b>e</b>) 11:00 UTC (24 April 2020, 07:00 UTC–19:00 UTC, 3-h intervals).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Locations of the 40 selected Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) sites used for comparing aerosol optical depth (AOD). Validation results of GK-2A AOD, AERONET (<b>a</b>), and Suomi-NPP/VIIRS (<b>b</b>) AOD in the 2020 yellow dust case. Results of statistical error (RMSE (<b>c</b>), bias (<b>d</b>)) analysis of GK-2A AOD and AERONET AOD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Cumulative distribution function (CDF) analysis results of visible and infrared aerosol optical depth (AOD) focusing on the 2020 yellow dust episodes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Cumulative distribution function (CDF) fitting analysis results of aerosol optical depth (AOD) &lt; 1.6 (<b>a</b>) and AOD &gt; 1.5 (<b>b</b>) focusing on the 2020 yellow dust episodes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Validation results of GK-2A Infrared aerosol optical depth (AOD) before (<b>a</b>) and after (<b>b</b>) applying the cumulative distribution function (CDF) fitting method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Histogram frequency results of GK-2A Infrared aerosol optical depth (AOD) before (<b>a</b>) and after (<b>b</b>) applying the cumulative distribution function (CDF) fitting method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Images of Asian dust based on GK-2A Dust detection, GK-2A Visible Dust Aerosol Optical Depth (DAOD), GK-2A Infrared DAOD on 26–28 March 2021 (<b>a</b>) 26, 23:00 UTC; (<b>b</b>) 27, 04:00 UTC; (<b>c</b>) 27, 09:00 UTC; (<b>d</b>) 27, 14:00 UTC; (<b>e</b>) 27, 19:00 UTC; and (<b>f</b>) 28, 01:00 UTC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Images of Asian dust based on GK-2A Dust detection, GK-2A Visible Dust Aerosol Optical Depth (DAOD), GK-2A Infrared DAOD on 14–16 April 2021. (<b>a</b>) 14, 23:00 UTC; (<b>b</b>) 15, 04:00 UTC; (<b>c</b>) 15, 09:00 UTC; (<b>d</b>) 15, 14:00 UTC; (<b>e</b>) 15, 19:00 UTC; and (<b>f</b>) 16, 01:00 UTC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Images of Asian dust based on GK-2A Dust detection, GK-2A Visible Dust Aerosol Optical Depth (DAOD), GK-2A Infrared DAOD on 5–7 May 2021 (<b>a</b>) 5, 23:00 UTC; (<b>b</b>) 6, 04:00 UTC; (<b>c</b>) 6, 09:00 UTC; (<b>d</b>) 6, 14:00 UTC; (<b>e</b>) 6, 19:00 UTC; and (<b>f</b>) 7, 01:00 UTC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Validation results after matching CALIOP/CALIPSO Infrared aerosol optical depth (AOD) (1020 nm) and GK-2A Infrared AOD (1050 nm). (Red box means that pixels where GK-2A matches CALIPSO at night).</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop