[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (89)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = 3D slicer

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
15 pages, 2807 KiB  
Article
Automatic Characterization of Prostate Suspect Lesions on T2-Weighted Image Acquisitions Using Texture Features and Machine-Learning Methods: A Pilot Study
by Teodora Telecan, Cosmin Caraiani, Bianca Boca, Roxana Sipos-Lascu, Laura Diosan, Zoltan Balint, Raluca Maria Hendea, Iulia Andras, Nicolae Crisan and Monica Lupsor-Platon
Diagnostics 2025, 15(1), 106; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15010106 (registering DOI) - 4 Jan 2025
Viewed by 144
Abstract
Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most frequent neoplasia in the male population. According to the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP), PCa can be divided into two major groups, based on their prognosis and treatment options. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) [...] Read more.
Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most frequent neoplasia in the male population. According to the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP), PCa can be divided into two major groups, based on their prognosis and treatment options. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) holds a central role in PCa assessment; however, it does not have a one-to-one correspondence with the histopathological grading of tumors. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithms and textural analysis, a subdivision of radiomics, have shown potential in bridging this gap. Objectives: We aimed to develop a machine-learning algorithm that predicts the ISUP grade of manually contoured prostate nodules on T2-weighted images and classifies them into clinically significant and indolent ones. Materials and Methods: We included 55 patients with 76 lesions. All patients were examined on the same 1.5 Tesla mpMRI scanner. Each nodule was manually segmented using the open-source 3D Slicer platform, and textural features were extracted using the PyRadiomics (version 3.0.1) library. The software was based on machine-learning classifiers. The accuracy was calculated based on precision, recall, and F1 scores. Results: The median age of the study group was 64 years (IQR 61–68), and the mean PSA value was 11.14 ng/mL. A total of 85.52% of the nodules were graded PI-RADS 4 or higher. Overall, the algorithm classified indolent and clinically significant PCas with an accuracy of 87.2%. Further, when trained to differentiate each ISUP group, the accuracy was 80.3%. Conclusions: We developed an AI-based decision-support system that accurately differentiates between the two PCa prognostic groups using only T2 MRI acquisitions by employing radiomics with a robust machine-learning architecture. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Dataset sample images, representing manually segmented T2WI images.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Graphical description of the study protocol.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Graphical representation of the classification algorithm.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 3288 KiB  
Article
Application of Ultrasound Radiomics in Differentiating Benign from Malignant Breast Nodules in Women with Post-Silicone Breast Augmentation
by Ling Hao, Yang Chen, Xuejiao Su and Buyun Ma
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(1), 29; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32010029 - 3 Jan 2025
Viewed by 244
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic value of ultrasound radiomics in distinguishing between benign and malignant breast nodules in women who have undergone silicone breast augmentation. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted of 99 breast nodules detected by ultrasound in 93 women who had [...] Read more.
Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic value of ultrasound radiomics in distinguishing between benign and malignant breast nodules in women who have undergone silicone breast augmentation. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted of 99 breast nodules detected by ultrasound in 93 women who had undergone silicone breast augmentation. The ultrasound data were collected between 1 January 2006 and 1 September 2023. The nodules were allocated into a training set (n = 69) and a validation set (n = 30). Regions of interest (ROIs) were manually delineated using 3D Slicer software, and radiomic features were extracted and selected using Python programming. Eight machine learning algorithms were applied to build predictive models, and their performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, area under the ROC curve (AUC), accuracy, Brier score, and log loss. Model performance was further evaluated using ROC curves and calibration curves, while clinical utility was assessed via decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: The random forest model exhibited superior performance in differentiating benign from malignant nodules in the validation set, achieving sensitivity of 0.765, specificity of 0.838, and an AUC of 0.787 (95% CI: 0.561–0.960). The model’s accuracy, Brier score, and log loss were 0.796, 0.197, and 0.599, respectively. DCA suggested potential clinical utility of the model. Conclusion: Ultrasound radiomics demonstrates promising diagnostic accuracy in differentiating benign from malignant breast nodules in women with silicone breast prostheses. This approach has the potential to serve as an additional diagnostic tool for patients following silicone breast augmentation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Breast Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) From a 45-year-old patient (fibroadenoma): (<b>a</b>) grayscale image and (<b>b</b>) ROI of a benign breast nodule. (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) From a 59-year-old patient (invasive ductal carcinoma): (<b>c</b>) grayscale image and (<b>d</b>) ROI of a malignant breast nodule.</p>
Full article ">Figure 1 Cont.
<p>(<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) From a 45-year-old patient (fibroadenoma): (<b>a</b>) grayscale image and (<b>b</b>) ROI of a benign breast nodule. (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) From a 59-year-old patient (invasive ductal carcinoma): (<b>c</b>) grayscale image and (<b>d</b>) ROI of a malignant breast nodule.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Process of constructing the final dataset, including the inclusion and exclusion criteria applied to select adult women who had undergone breast augmentation for cosmetic purposes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) LASSO coefficient profiles displaying the variation in coefficients for different variables as a function of the regularization parameter log(λ), showcasing the feature selection process in LASSO regression; (<b>b</b>) LASSO parameter-tuning results using 5-fold cross-validation, illustrating the relationship between log(λ) and binomial deviance, with the optimal log(λ) value identified via minimizing the deviance for improved model fitting; (<b>c</b>) horizontal bar chart showing the importance of the nine optimal features selected, with longer bars indicating higher feature importance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3 Cont.
<p>(<b>a</b>) LASSO coefficient profiles displaying the variation in coefficients for different variables as a function of the regularization parameter log(λ), showcasing the feature selection process in LASSO regression; (<b>b</b>) LASSO parameter-tuning results using 5-fold cross-validation, illustrating the relationship between log(λ) and binomial deviance, with the optimal log(λ) value identified via minimizing the deviance for improved model fitting; (<b>c</b>) horizontal bar chart showing the importance of the nine optimal features selected, with longer bars indicating higher feature importance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>ROC curves of eight models on the training set (<b>a</b>) and the validation set (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Calibration curve of the random forest model on the validation set.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The clinical decision curve (DCA) for the random forest model on the training set (<b>a</b>) and the validation set (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">
10 pages, 807 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of the Effects of Sedation and Anesthesia on Total Lung Volume and Attenuation in Rabbit Lung CT Exams
by Roberto Sargo, Inês Tomé, Filipe Silva and Mário Ginja
Animals 2024, 14(23), 3473; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14233473 - 1 Dec 2024
Viewed by 654
Abstract
Respiratory disease is common in rabbits, but subclinical conditions can be challenging to diagnose and may cause respiratory problems during anesthesia. CT is the preferred method for diagnosing lung diseases, but anesthesia can alter lung volume and cause lung lobe collapse. In this [...] Read more.
Respiratory disease is common in rabbits, but subclinical conditions can be challenging to diagnose and may cause respiratory problems during anesthesia. CT is the preferred method for diagnosing lung diseases, but anesthesia can alter lung volume and cause lung lobe collapse. In this study, seventeen healthy 5-month-old male New Zealand white rabbits underwent thoracic CT scans under different conditions. Rabbits were sedated with midazolam and butorphanol and scanned in a sphinx position; they were then anesthetized with dexmedetomidine and ketamine and scanned again in sternal recumbency during spontaneous breathing. Lastly, apnea was induced using intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) for a final scan. Lung volume and density were measured using the 3D Slicer version 5.6.2 software, with thresholds set between −1050 and −100 Hounsfield Units (HU). Sedated animals had significantly higher total lung volume (69.39 ± 10.04 cm3) than anesthetized (47.10 ± 9.28 cm3) and anesthetized apnea rabbits (48.60 ± 7.40 cm3). Mean lung attenuation during sedation was −611.26 HU (right) and −636.00 HU (left). After anesthesia induction, values increased to −552.75 HU (right) and −561.90 HU (left). Following apnea induction, attenuation slightly decreased to −569.40 HU (right) and −579.94 HU (left). The results indicate that sedation may be preferable for rabbit lung CT to minimize anesthesia-related changes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Mammals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>3dSlicer extension LungCTanalyser threshold segmentation of the left lung of a sedated rabbit, selecting inflated aerated tissue (−899 to −500 HU) (transverse, dorsal, and sagittal lung planes; upper left and bottom images, respectively). 3D reconstruction of lung and trachea, obtained from the masked segments in Lung Segmentator extension (upper right corner) (R—right; L—left; S—superior).</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 3909 KiB  
Article
GPU-Enabled Volume Renderer for Use with MATLAB
by Raphael Scheible
Digital 2024, 4(4), 990-1007; https://doi.org/10.3390/digital4040049 - 30 Nov 2024
Viewed by 410
Abstract
Traditional tools, such as 3D Slicer, Fiji, and MATLAB®, often encounter limitations in rendering performance and data management as the dataset sizes increase. This work presents a GPU-enabled volume renderer with a MATLAB® interface that addresses these issues. The proposed [...] Read more.
Traditional tools, such as 3D Slicer, Fiji, and MATLAB®, often encounter limitations in rendering performance and data management as the dataset sizes increase. This work presents a GPU-enabled volume renderer with a MATLAB® interface that addresses these issues. The proposed renderer uses flexible memory management and leverages the GPU texture-mapping features of NVIDIA devices. It transfers data between the CPU and the GPU only in the case of a data change between renderings, and uses texture memory to make use of specific hardware benefits of the GPU and improve the quality. A case study using the ViBE-Z zebrafish larval dataset demonstrated the renderer’s ability to produce visualizations while managing extensive data effectively within the MATLAB® environment. The renderer is available as open-source software. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>This illustration shows the 4 main steps of the rendering process: (1) ray intersection, (2) sampling, (3) shading, and (4) compositing: The colors in step (1) represent the voxel colors, step (2) illustrates the ray and its sampling steps, step (3) shows the shaded color values determined for each ray step, and step (4) displays the resulting pixel value at the bottom (image source: [<a href="#B30-digital-04-00049" class="html-bibr">30</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Henyey–Greenstein phase function with different <span class="html-italic">g</span> values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The correct off-axis stereo camera setup. The extended frustums are depicted. To obtain the off-axis projection plane, one has to trim the projection plane of each extended frustum.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Projection of a volume onto the projection plane. The blue dashed line depicts the distance to the volume. Additionally, the eight rays of the object’s corners are drawn.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>In order to save GPU memory, one volume can be mapped to multiple textures. Additionally, the gradient can be computed on the fly. Thus, it is possible to set up the renderer with only one volume. This can be required if one is rendering a high-resolution volume. <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>k</mi> <mrow> <mi>e</mi> <mi>m</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>k</mi> <mrow> <mi>a</mi> <mi>b</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>, and <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>k</mi> <mrow> <mi>e</mi> <mi>m</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math> are scalar multiplicators that can be defined to adjust the lookup values. <math display="inline"><semantics> <mover accent="true"> <mi>n</mi> <mo stretchy="false">→</mo> </mover> </semantics></math> is the normal vector, which is required to compute a voxel’s reflection dependent on the light sources.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The angles <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>α</mi> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>β</mi> </semantics></math>, and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>γ</mi> </semantics></math> suffice to describe the whole illumination scene. <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mover accent="true"> <mi>L</mi> <mo stretchy="false">→</mo> </mover> <mi>i</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> is the vector of incoming light and <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mover accent="true"> <mi>L</mi> <mo stretchy="false">→</mo> </mover> <mi>o</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> is the vector of outgoing light toward the viewer. <math display="inline"><semantics> <msubsup> <mover accent="true"> <mi>L</mi> <mo stretchy="false">→</mo> </mover> <mi>i</mi> <mo>′</mo> </msubsup> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <msubsup> <mover accent="true"> <mi>L</mi> <mo stretchy="false">→</mo> </mover> <mi>o</mi> <mo>′</mo> </msubsup> </semantics></math> are the projections of these vectors onto the surface plane. <math display="inline"><semantics> <mover accent="true"> <mi>n</mi> <mo stretchy="false">→</mo> </mover> </semantics></math> is the normal vector.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>To provide call by reference instead of call by value, Volume and VolumeRender inherit handle. Additionally, the assignment of members does not return a deep copy of the object. Since instances of LightSource consume low memory, it does not inherit handle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Rendered images of a zebrafish embryo average brain with different emission, absorption, and reflection factors. A square root normalization was applied to all images and they were inverted to enhance the print quality.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Rendered images of a zebrafish embryo average brain and the 3A10-marked neural structure rendered in a separate pass in a pink color. In the sequence shown, the fish was rotated 360° while one side of the average brain was faded out and finally rendered transparent, while the structure remained visible in pink. The first image is at the top-left and the last at the bottom-right.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Rendered images of a human brain from the BraTS2020 dataset, with highlighted tumor regions displayed in pink. In the sequence depicted, the brain was rotated 360°, while one side of the brain gradually faded out and became fully transparent, which allowed the tumor region to remain clearly visible in pink. The sequence progressed from the top-left to the bottom-right, with the first frame at the top and the final frame at the bottom.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>A rendered image of a zebrafish embryo average brain and the 3A10-marked neural structure in anaglyph. Allures of the part that is fading out are still visible.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 42128 KiB  
Article
Adaptation of Conventional Toolpath-Generation Software for Use in Curved-Layer Fused Deposition Modeling
by Samuel Maissen, Severin Zürcher and Michael Wüthrich
J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2024, 8(6), 270; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp8060270 - 28 Nov 2024
Viewed by 1135
Abstract
In 3D printing, the layered structure often results in artifacts. This effect becomes stronger for surfaces with a lower ramp angle. This effect can be mitigated by manufacturing parts with non-planar layers that fit the parts’ surface geometry. Using the open-source slicing software [...] Read more.
In 3D printing, the layered structure often results in artifacts. This effect becomes stronger for surfaces with a lower ramp angle. This effect can be mitigated by manufacturing parts with non-planar layers that fit the parts’ surface geometry. Using the open-source slicing software PrusaSlicer. an algorithm was developed to modify the slicer’s input and output data in a way that fits parts with low ramp angle surfaces. To achieve consistent part quality, all layers were modified to be printed in a non-planar way. The test results indicate that the proposed methods can significantly reduce surface roughness. Although the algorithm works well for parts with a flat base and vertical walls, it would need to be highly adapted to work for different part geometries. Additionally, compared to other algorithms used in Curved-Layer Fused Deposition Modeling (CLFDM), the changed layer structure introduces a changed visual appearance of parts. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Stair-stepping effect.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Angle <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>α</mi> </semantics></math> deduced from the printhead geometry as described by Ahlers [<a href="#B4-jmmp-08-00270" class="html-bibr">4</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Transformation using method 1 (cross-section view).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Detailed illustration of the scaling process (cross-section view).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The different areas (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) for <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>α</mi> </semantics></math> = 40° of a part with a 45° chamfer, where (<b>d</b>) is the STL before, (<b>e</b>) after the transformation, and (<b>f</b>) after slicing.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Transformation using method 2 (cross-section view).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Part geometry with a 1:6 ratio and a surface angle of 20°.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Penetration compensation for ironing (cross-section view).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Samples for measuring the computing time.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Printed test part with variable layer height between 0.05 mm and 0.3 mm in <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>L</mi> <mi>V</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> section.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Test part with a ramp angle of 10° and the measurement paths with (a): −45°, (b): 0°, (c): 45°, (d): 90°.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>GCode view of different wedge samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Surface quality comparison for samples 3, 5, and 6.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Non-planar printed test parts with a wavy surface.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 1741 KiB  
Article
Radiomic and Clinical Model in the Prognostic Evaluation of Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
by Paolo Rondi, Michele Tomasoni, Bruno Cunha, Vittorio Rampinelli, Paolo Bossi, Andrea Guerini, Davide Lombardi, Andrea Borghesi, Stefano Maria Magrini, Michela Buglione, Davide Mattavelli, Cesare Piazza, Marika Vezzoli, Davide Farina and Marco Ravanelli
Cancers 2024, 16(23), 3926; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16233926 - 23 Nov 2024
Viewed by 626
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma (AdCC) is a rare malignant salivary gland tumor, with high rates of recurrence and distant metastasis. This study aims to stratify patients Relapse-Free Survival (RFS) using a combined model of clinical and radiomic features from preoperative MRI. Methods: This [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma (AdCC) is a rare malignant salivary gland tumor, with high rates of recurrence and distant metastasis. This study aims to stratify patients Relapse-Free Survival (RFS) using a combined model of clinical and radiomic features from preoperative MRI. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with primary AdCC who underwent surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy. Segmentations were manually performed by two head and neck radiologists. Radiomic features were extracted using the 3D Slicer software. Descriptive statistics was performed. A Survival Random Forest model was employed to select which radiological feature predict RFS. Cox proportional hazards models were constructed using clinical, radiological variables or both. Synthetic data augmentation was applied to address the small sample size and improve model robustness. Models were validated on real data and compared using the C-index and Prediction Error Curves (PEC). Results: Three Cox models were developed: one with clinical features (C-index = 0.67), one with radiomic features (C-index = 0.68), and one combining both (C-index = 0.77). The combined clinical-radiomic model had the highest predictive accuracy and outperformed models based on clinical or radiomic features. The combined model also exhibited the lowest mean Brier score in PEC analysis, indicating better predictive performance. Conclusions: This study demonstrate that a combined radiomic-clinical model can predict RFS in AdCC patients. This model may provide clinicians a valuable tool in patient’s management and may aid in personalized treatment planning. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Radiomics in Head and Neck Cancer Care)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Relative Variable Importance (relVIM), extracted from a Survival Random Forest, where the response variable was Relapse-Free Survival and the 233 radiomic features were the covariates.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Survival curves of the Cox model where the outcome is RFS and the clinical covariates are grading and margin, stratified respect the best cut-off point estimated on the training set with the long-rank test; (<b>A</b>): survival curves estimated on the training set (52 synthetic data); (<b>B</b>): survival curves validated on the test set (52 real observations).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Survival curves of the Cox model where the outcome is RFS and the covariates are the ten radiological features selected by the Survival Random Forest, stratified respect the best cut-off point estimated on the training set with the long-rank test; (<b>A</b>): survival curves estimated on the training set (52 synthetic data); (<b>B</b>): survival curves validated on the test set (52 real observations).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Survival curves of the Cox model where the outcome is RFS and the covariates are the two clinical variables (grading and margin) and the ten radiological features selected by the Survival Random Forest, stratified with respect to the best cut-off point estimated on the training set with the long-rank test; (<b>A</b>): survival curves estimated on the training set (52 synthetic data); (<b>B</b>): survival curves validated on the test set (52 real observations).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Prediction Errors Curves (PEC) for selecting the best model.</p>
Full article ">
10 pages, 859 KiB  
Article
The Ratio of Baseline Ventricle Volume to Total Brain Volume Predicts Postoperative Ventriculo-Peritoneal Shunt Dependency after Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery
by Lisa Haddad, Franziska Glieme, Martin Vychopen, Felix Arlt, Alim Emre Basaran, Erdem Güresir and Johannes Wach
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(19), 5789; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13195789 - 28 Sep 2024
Viewed by 765
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Obstructive hydrocephalus associated with vestibular schwannoma (VS) is the most common in giant VS. Despite tumor removal, some patients may require ongoing ventriculo-peritoneal (VP) surgery. This investigation explores the factors contributing to the requirement for VP surgery following VS surgery in instances [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Obstructive hydrocephalus associated with vestibular schwannoma (VS) is the most common in giant VS. Despite tumor removal, some patients may require ongoing ventriculo-peritoneal (VP) surgery. This investigation explores the factors contributing to the requirement for VP surgery following VS surgery in instances of persistent hydrocephalus (HCP). Methods: Volumetric MRI analyses of pre- and postoperative tumor volumes, cerebellum, cerebrum, ventricle system, fourth ventricle, brainstem, and peritumoral edema were conducted using Brainlab Smartbrush and 3D Slicer. The total brain volume was defined as the sum of the cerebrum, cerebellum, and brainstem. ROC analyses were performed to identify the optimum cut-off values of the volumetric data. Results: Permanent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion after surgery was indicated in 12 patients (12/71; 16.9%). The ratio of baseline volume fraction of brain ventricles to total brain ventricle volume (VTB ratio) was found to predict postoperative VP shunt dependency. The AUC was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.51–0.91), and the optimum threshold value (</≥0.449) yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 67% and 81%, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analyses of imaging data (pre- and postoperative VS volume, VTB ratio, and extent of resection (%) (EoR)) and patient-specific factors revealed that an increased VTB ratio (≥0.049, OR: 6.2, 95% CI: 1.0–38.0, p = 0.047) and an EoR < 96.4% (OR: 9.1, 95% CI: 1.2–69.3, p = 0.032) were independently associated with postoperative VP shunt dependency. Conclusions: Primary tumor removal remains the best treatment to reduce the risk of postoperative persistent hydrocephalus. However, patients with an increased preoperative VTB ratio are prone to needing postoperative VP shunt surgery and may benefit from perioperative EVD placement. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Neurology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>upper row</b>) Segmentation data of a patient with low VTB-ratio; (<b>lower row</b>) Segmentation data of a patient with high VTB-ratio.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Violin plot of the VTB ratio for patients with and without shunt dependency.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>ROC analysis: ventricle to total brain ratio and VP shunt dependencies.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Forest plots from multivariable binary logistic regression analysis: VTB ratio and EoR (%) are independent predictors of persistent HCP in VS.</p>
Full article ">
39 pages, 20161 KiB  
Article
The Bony Nasal Cavity and Paranasal Sinuses of Big Felids and Domestic Cat: A Study Using Anatomical Techniques, Computed Tomographic Images Reconstructed in Maximum-Intensity Projection, Volume Rendering and 3D Printing Models
by Elena Díaz Martínez, Alberto Arencibia Espinosa, Marta Soler Laguía, María Dolores Ayala Florenciano, David Kilroy, María I. García García, Francisco Martínez Gomariz, Cayetano Sánchez Collado, Francisco Gil Cano, José Raduán Jaber and Gregorio Ramírez Zarzosa
Animals 2024, 14(17), 2609; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14172609 - 7 Sep 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1630
Abstract
This study aims to develop three-dimensional printing models of the bony nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses of big and domestic cats using reconstructed computed tomographic images. This work included an exhaustive study of the osseous nasal anatomy of the domestic cat carried out [...] Read more.
This study aims to develop three-dimensional printing models of the bony nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses of big and domestic cats using reconstructed computed tomographic images. This work included an exhaustive study of the osseous nasal anatomy of the domestic cat carried out through dissections, bone trepanations and sectional anatomy. With the use of OsiriX viewer, the DICOM images were postprocessed to obtaining maximum-intensity projection and volume-rendering reconstructions, which allowed for the visualization of the nasal cavity structures and the paranasal sinuses, providing an improvement in the future anatomical studies and diagnosis of pathologies. DICOM images were also processed with AMIRA software to obtain three-dimensional images using semiautomatic segmentation application. These images were then exported using 3D Slicer software for three-dimensional printing. Molds were printed with the Stratasys 3D printer. In human medicine, three-dimensional printing is already of great importance in the clinical field; however, it has not yet been implemented in veterinary medicine and is a technique that will, in the future, in addition to facilitating the anatomical study and diagnosis of diseases, allow for the development of implants that will improve the treatment of pathologies and the survival of big felids. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Representative anatomical dissections images of the cat’s head. The head was sectioned sagittally. The nasal and incisive bones were removed. (<b>A</b>): Left rostromedial view. (<b>B</b>): Rostrodorsal view. (<b>C</b>): Rostroventral view. (<b>D</b>): Left medial view with endoturbinated and ventral nasal concha. (<b>E</b>): Left medial view in which it has been removed, completely, the 2nd, 3rd and 4th endoturbinates. 1. Frontal bone; 2. Frontal bone: external plate; 3. Frontal bone: internal plate; 4. Ethmoid bone: cribriform plate; 5. Ethmoid bone: tectorial plate; 6. Frontal bone: zygomatic process; 7. Parietal bone; 8. Temporal bone: zygomatic process; 9. Zygomatic bone: body; 10. Zygomatic bone: temporal process; 11. Infraorbital canal; 12. Maxilla; 13. Maxilla: palatine process; 14. Palatine bone; 15. Choana; 16. Presphenoid, basisphenoid and basilar part of occipital bones; 17. Frontal sinus; 18. 1st ectoturbinate; 19. 2nd ectoturbinate; 20. Dorsal nasal concha; 21. Middle nasal concha; 22. 3rd endoturbinate; 23. 4th endoturbinate; 24. Ventral nasal concha; 25. Maxillary recess; 26. Sphenoidal sinus; 27. Right mandible; 28. Tongue; 29. Soft palate; 30. Nasopharynx (pars nasalis pharyngis); 31. Encephalon.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Representative anatomical dissections images of the cat’s head. (<b>A</b>): Medial view of the maxilla isolated. (<b>B</b>,<b>C</b>): Left lateral and right medial views, after removing the nasal, incisive, maxillary, zygomatic and lacrimal bones. 1. Maxilla: body; 2. Maxilla: palatine process; 3. Ventral nasal concha; 4. Frontal bone: external plate; 5. Frontal bone: orbital surface; 6. Frontal bone: zygomatic process; 7. Parietal bone; 8. Temporal bone: squamous part; 9. Temporal bone: zygomatic process; 10. Left mandible; 11. Dorsal nasal concha; 12. Middle nasal concha; 13. 3rd endoturbinate; 14. 4th endoturbinate; 15. Sphenoidal sinus; 16. Frontal sinus; 17. Nasal septum: cartilage (partially sectioned); 18. Choanae; 19. Nasopharynx (pars nasalis pharyngis); 20. Presphenoid, basisphenoid and basilar part of occipital bones; 21. Palatine bone. 22. Soft palate.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Bone trepanations images of the cat’s skull. (<b>A</b>): Left rostrolateral view after removing the orbital surface of the frontal bone and the wings of the presphenoid and basisphenoid bones. (<b>B</b>): Right medial view after removing the bone and cartilaginous parts of the nasal septum. (<b>C</b>): Left dorsal oblique view after removing the rostral half of the orbit. (<b>D</b>): Left dorsal oblique view showing the endoturbinates and ectoturbinates. 1. Nasal bone; 2. Frontal bone: external plate; 3. Frontal bone: internal plate; 4. Ethmoid bone: tectorial plate; 5. Ethmoid bone: cribriform plate; 6. Frontal sinus; 7. 1st ectoturbinate; 8. 2nd ectoturbinate; 9. 3rd ectoturbinate; 10. Dorsal nasal concha; 11. Middle nasal concha; 12. 3rd endoturbinate; 13. 4th endoturbinate; 14. Ventral nasal concha; 15. Parietal bone; 16. Osseous tentorium of the cerebellum; 17. Cerebral fossa; 18. Cerebellar fossa; 19. Hypophyseal fossa; 20. Ethmoidal fossa; 21. Temporal bone: petrous part; 22. Occipital bone: squama; 23. Occipital bone: basilar part; 24. Basisphenoid bone: body; 25. Presphenoid bone: body; 26. Sphenoidal sinus: septum; 27. Incisive bone: palatine process; 28. Maxilla: palatine process; 29. Palatine bone: horizontal and perpendicular plate; 30. Choana; 31. Frontal bone: zygomatic process; 32. Temporal bone: squamous part; 33. Temporal bone: zygomatic process; 34. Zygomatic bone: body; 35. Zygomatic bone: frontal process; 36. Zygomatic bone: temporal process; 37. Maxilla; 38. Incisive bone: body; 39: Incisive bone: nasal process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Transverse anatomical sections of the cat’s head at the level of the nasal plane, vestibule and rostral part of the nasal cavity: respiratory part. (<b>A</b>): Rostral view, level section I. (<b>B</b>): Caudal view, level section II. 1. Tip of the nose; 2. Nasal orifice (nares); 3. Subnasal groove or philtrum; 4. Lateral accessory nasal cartilage; 5. Dorsal lateral nasal cartilage; 6. Ventral lateral nasal cartilage; 7. Alar groove; 8. Frontal bone; 9. Frontal sinus: septum; 10. Nasal septum: cartilage; 11. Vomer; 12. Maxilla: palatine process; 13. Canine tooth: root; 14. Maxilla: orbital surface; 15. Ectoturbinates; 16. Dorsal and middle nasal conchae; 17. 3rd endoturbinate; 18. Ventral nasal concha; 19. Conchal crest of the maxilla; 20. Nasal bone.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Transverse anatomical sections of the cat’s head at the level of the rostral part of the nasal cavity: respiratory part. (<b>A</b>) Rostral view, level section III. (<b>B</b>) Caudal view, level section IV. 1. Frontal bone; 2. Frontal sinus: septum; 3. Nasal septum: cartilage; 4. Vomer; 5. Maxilla: palatine process; 6. Canine tooth: root; 7. Maxilla: orbital surface; 8. Ectoturbinates; 9. Dorsal nasal concha; 10. Middle nasal concha; 11. 3rd endoturbinate; 12. Ventral nasal concha; 13. Conchal crest of the maxilla; 14. Vomeronasal organ; 15. Nasal cavernous plexuses; 16. Maxillary recess.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Transverse anatomical sections of the cat’s head at the level of the middle part of the nasal cavity; respiratory part. (<b>A</b>): Rostral view, level section V. (<b>B</b>): Caudal view, level section VI. 1. Frontal bone; 2. Frontal sinus: septum; 3. Nasal septum: cartilage; 4. Vomer; 5. Maxilla: palatine process; 6. 1st premolar tooth: root; 7. Frontal bone: orbital surface; 8. 1st ectoturbinate; 9. 2nd ectoturbinate; 10. 3rd ectoturbinate; 11. Dorsal nasal concha; 12. Middle nasal concha; 13. 3rd endoturbinate; 14. Ventral nasal concha; 15. Conchal crest of the maxilla; 16. Maxillary recess; 17. Vomeronasal organ; 18. Nasal cavernous plexuses; 19. Frontal sinus.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Transverse anatomical sections of the cat’s head at the level of the caudal part of the nasal cavity; respiratory part. (<b>A</b>): Rostral view, level section VII. (<b>B</b>): Caudal view, level section VIII. 1. Frontal bone; 2. Frontal sinus: septum; 3. Nasal septum: cartilage; 4. Vomer; 5. Maxilla: palatine process; 6. 2nd premolar tooth: root; 7. Frontal bone: orbital surface; 8. 1st ectoturbinate; 9. 2nd ectoturbinate; 10. 3rd ectoturbinate; 11. Dorsal nasal concha; 12. Middle nasal concha; 13. Conchal crest of the 3rd endoturbinate; 14. 3rd endoturbinate; 15. Conchal crest of the maxilla; 16. Ventral nasal concha; 17. Maxillary recess; 18. Frontal sinus; 19. Vomeronasal organ; 20. Nasal cavernous plexuses.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Transverse anatomical sections of the cat’s head at the level of the caudal part of the nasal cavity; olfactory part. (<b>A</b>): Rostral view, level section IX. (<b>B</b>): Caudal view, level section X. 1. Frontal bone; 2. Frontal sinus: septum; 3. Ethmoid bone: perpendicular plate; 4. Vomer; 5. Maxilla: palatine process; 6. 3rd premolar tooth: root; 7. Ethmoid bone: orbital plate; 8. Frontal sinus; 9. 1st ectoturbinate; 10. 2nd ectoturbinate; 11. Dorsal nasal concha; 12. Middle nasal concha; 13. 3rd endoturbinate; 14. 4th endoturbinate; 15. Maxillary recess; 16. Ethmoid bone: basal plate; 17. Choana; 18. Olfactory bulb.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Transverse anatomical sections of the cat’s head at the level of the caudal part of the nasal cavity: olfactory part. (<b>A</b>) Rostral view, level section XI. (<b>B</b>) Caudal view, level section XII. 1. Frontal bone; 2. Frontal sinus: septum; 3. Ethmoid bone: tectorial plate; 4. Ethmoid bone: perpendicular plate; 5. Vomer; 6. Ethmoid bone: basal plate; 7. Palatine bone: perpendicular plate; 8. Palatine bone: horizontal plate; 9. Molar tooth: root; 10. Presphenoid wing: orbital surface; 11. Frontal bone: orbital surface; 12. Frontal sinus; 13. 3rd endoturbinate; 14. 4th endoturbinate; 15. Choana; 16. Olfactory bulb.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Transverse anatomical sections of the cat’s head at the level of the paranasal sinuses and nasopharynx (pars nasalis pharyngis). (<b>A</b>): Rostral view, level section XIII. (<b>B</b>): Caudal view, level section XIV. 1. Frontal bone: external plate; 2. Frontal bone: internal plate; 3. Frontal sinus: septum; 4. Frontal bone: orbital surface; 5. Basisphenoid bone: wing (orbital surface); 6. Presphenoid bone: body; 7. Sphenoidal sinus: septum; 8. Basisphenoid bone: pterygoid process; 9. Vomer; 10. Soft palate; 11. Frontal sinus; 12. Sphenoidal sinus; 13. 4th endoturbinate; 14. Sphenoidal sinus: caudal wall; 15. Nasopharynx (pars nasalis pharyngis); 16. Cranial cavity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Transverse anatomical sections of the cat’s head at the level of the paranasal sinuses and nasopharynx (pars nasalis pharyngis). (<b>A</b>): Rostral view, level section XV. (<b>B</b>): Caudal view, level section XVI. 1. Frontal bone; 2. Frontal bone: orbital surface; 3. Cranial cavity; 4. Sphenoidal sinus: septum; 5. Sphenoidal sinus; 6. Presphenoid bone: body; 7. Presphenoid bone: wing; 8. Vomer; 9. Nasopharynx (pars nasalis pharyngis): mucosa; 10. Soft palate; 11. Oropharynx; 12. Tongue.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Dorsal anatomical sections of the cat’s head at the level of the (<b>A</b>) frontal sinus, level I and (<b>B</b>,<b>C</b>) frontal sinus and ectoturbinates, levels II and III. Images are oriented so that the rostral part is at the top. All views are dorsal. 1. Frontal bone: external plate; 2. Frontal bone: internal plate; 3. Frontal sinus; 4. Frontal sinus: septum; 5. 1st ectoturbinate; 6. 3rd ectoturbinate; 7. Cranial cavity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Dorsal anatomical sections of the cat’s head at the level of the (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) ectoturbinates, levels IV and V, and (<b>C</b>) endoturbinates, level VI. Images are oriented so that the rostral part is at the top. All views are dorsal. 1. Nasal bone; 2. Maxilla; 3. Frontal sinus: septum; 4. 1st ectoturbinate; 5. 2nd ectoturbinate; 6. 3rd ectoturbinate; 7. Frontal bone: internal plate; 8. Ethmoid bone: tectorial plate; 9. Ethmoid bone: cribriform plate; 10. Frontal sinus; 11. Nasal septum: cartilage; 12. Dorsal nasal concha; 13. Ethmoidal fossa; 14. Cranial cavity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Dorsal anatomical sections at the level of cat’s head at the level of the (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) endoturbinates, levels VII and VIII, and (<b>C</b>) sphenoidal sinuses, level IX. Images are oriented so that the rostral part is at the top. All views are dorsal. 1. Nose; 2. Nasal septum: cartilage; 3. Ethmoid bone: cribriform plate; 4. Incisive bone: nasal process; 5. Maxilla; 6. Presphenoid bone; 7. Middle nasal concha; 8. 3rd endoturbinate; 9. 4th endoturbinate; 10. Ventral nasal concha; 11. Basal fold; 12. Alar fold; 13. Sphenoidal sinus: septum; 14. Sphenoidal sinus; 15. Dorsal nasal concha.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Dorsal anatomical sections of the cat’s head at the level of the (<b>A</b>) endoturbinates and ventral nasal concha, level X and (<b>B</b>) nasopharynx (pars nasalis pharyngis), level XI. Images are oriented so that the rostral part is at the top. All views are dorsal. 1. Nasal orifice; 2. Canine tooth: root; 3. Vomer; 4. Nasal cavernous plexuses; 5. Presphenoid bone; 6. Choana; 7: Soft palate: dorsal surface; 8. Nasopharynx (pars nasalis pharyngis); 9. 3rd endoturbinate; 10. Ventral nasal concha; 11. 4th endoturbinate.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Sagittal anatomical sections of the cat’s head at the level of the (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) paranasal sinuses, nasal cavity and nasopharynx (pars nasalis pharyngis), levels I and II, and (<b>C</b>) frontal sinuses and nasal cavity, level III. Images are oriented so that the rostral part is to the left and the dorsal is at the top. All views are left lateral. 1. Nose; 2. Nasal bone; 3. Frontal bone: external plate; 4. Frontal bone: internal plate; 5. Ethmoid bone: tectorial plate; 6. Ethmoid bone: cribriform plate; 7. Basal fold; 8. Alar fold; 9. Straight fold; 10. Ectoturbinates; 11. Dorsal nasal concha; 12. Middle nasal concha; 13. 3rd endoturbinate; 14. 4th endoturbinate; 15. Ventral nasal concha; 16. Sphenoidal sinus; 17. Frontal sinus: septum; 18. Frontal sinus; 19. Choana; 20. Nasopharynx (pars nasalis pharyngis); 21. Maxilla: palatine process; 22. Incisive bone.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Sagittal anatomical sections of the cat’s head at the level of the (<b>A</b>–<b>C</b>) nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses and nasopharynx (pars nasalis pharyngis), levels IV, V and VI. Images are oriented so that the rostral part is to the left and the dorsal is at the top. All views are left lateral. 1. Nose; 2. Nasal bone; 3. Frontal bone: external plate; 4. Frontal bone: internal plate; 5. Ethmoid bone: tectorial plate; 6. Basal fold; 7. Alar fold; 8. Straight fold; 9. Ectoturbinates; 10. Dorsal nasal concha; 11. Middle nasal concha; 12. 3rd endoturbinate; 13. 4th endoturbinate; 14. Ventral nasal concha; 15. Frontal sinus: septum; 16. Frontal sinus; 17. Sphenoidal sinus; 18. Choana; 19. Maxilla: palatine process; 20. Incisive bone.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Sagittal anatomical section of the cat’s head at the level of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses, level I. The venous plexuses have been injected with blue latex via an external jugular vein. The image is oriented so that the rostral part is to the left and the dorsal is at the top. Left lateral view. 1. Nasal vestibule; 2. Respiratory part; 3. Olfactory part; 4. Nasal cavernous plexuses.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Approximate anatomical-level CT sections of the cat’s head. Lines depict the transverse (<b>A</b>), sagittal (<b>B</b>) and dorsal (<b>C</b>) planes. Each number represents the location for each CT transverse (I to V), sagittal (I) and dorsal (I) images.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Amira representative transverse CT images at level of the rostral portion of the respiratory part, level I. Images are oriented so that the left side of the head is to the right and the dorsal is at the top. All views are rostral. (<b>A</b>): Leopard; (<b>B</b>): Lion; (<b>C</b>): Cheetah and (<b>D</b>): Cat. 1. Nasal bone; 2. Maxilla; 3. Maxilla: palatine process; 4. Canine tooth: root; 5. Vomer; 6. Dorsal nasal concha; 7. Ventral nasal concha.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Amira representative transverse CT images at level of the middle portion of the respiratory part, level II. Images are oriented so that the left side of the head is to the right and the dorsal is at the top. All views are rostral. (<b>A</b>): Leopard; (<b>B</b>): Lion; (<b>C</b>): Cheetah and (<b>D</b>): Cat. 1. Nasal bone; 2. Frontal bone; 3. Maxilla; 4. Zygomatic bone; 5. Infraorbital canal; 6. Ethmoid bone: tectorial plate; 7. Maxilla: palatine process; 8. Nasal septum; 9. Vomer; 10. Dorsal nasal concha; 11. Middle nasal concha; 12. Ventral nasal concha; 13. 3rd endoturbinate; 14. Maxillary recess; 15. Frontal sinus; 16. Dorsal nasal meatus; 17. Common nasal meatus; 18. Ventral nasal meatus.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Amira representative transverse CT images at level of the middle portion of the respiratory part, level III. Images are oriented so that the left side of the head is to the right and the dorsal is at the top. All views are rostral. (<b>A</b>): Leopard; (<b>B</b>): Lion; (<b>C</b>): Cheetah and (<b>D</b>): Cat. 1. Frontal bone; 2. Maxilla; 3. Zygomatic process: body; 4. Zygomatic bone: temporal process; 5. Infraorbital canal; 6. Ethmoid bone: tectorial plate; 7. Maxilla: palatine process; 8. Nasal septum; 9. Vomer; 10. Dorsal nasal concha; 11. Middle nasal concha; 12. 3rd endoturbinate; 13. Ventral nasal concha; 14. Maxillary recess; 15. Frontal sinus; 16. 1st ectoturbinate; 17. 2nd ectoturbinate; 18. 3rd ectoturbinate; 19. Dorsal nasal meatus; 20. Common nasal meatus; 21. Ventral nasal meatus.</p>
Full article ">Figure 23
<p>Amira representative transverse CT images at the level of the caudal portion of the respiratory part, level IV. Images are oriented so that the left side of the head is to the right and the dorsal is at the top. All views are rostral. (<b>A</b>): Leopard; (<b>B</b>): Lion; (<b>C</b>): Cheetah and (<b>D</b>): Cat. 1. Frontal bone: external plate; 2. Frontal bone: orbital surface; 3. Frontal sinus; 4. Frontal sinus: septum; 5. 1st ectoturbinate; 6. 2nd ectoturbinate; 7. 3rd ectoturbinate; 8. Dorsal nasal concha; 9. Middle nasal concha; 10; Ethmoid bone: perpendicular plate; 11. 3rd endoturbinate; 12. 4th endoturbinate; 13. Presphenoid bone: wing (orbital surface); 14. Presphenoid bone: body; 15. Vomer; 16. Choana; 17. Palatine bone: horizontal and perpendicular plates.</p>
Full article ">Figure 24
<p>Amira representative transverse CT images at the level of the olfactory part of the nasal cavity, level V. Images are oriented so that the left side of the head is to de right and the dorsal is at the top. All views are rostral. (<b>A</b>): Leopard; (<b>B</b>): Lion; (<b>C</b>): Cheetah and (<b>D</b>): Cat. 1. Frontal bone: external plate; 2. Frontal bone: orbital surface; 3. Frontal sinus; 4. Frontal sinus: septum; 5. 1st ectoturbinate; 6. 2nd ectoturbinate; 7. 3rd ectoturbinate; 8. Dorsal nasal concha; 9. Middle nasal concha; 10. Ethmoid bone: perpendicular plate; 11. Basisphenoid bone: wing (orbital surface); 12. 3rd endoturbinate; 13. 4th endoturbinate; 14. Presphenoid bone: wing; 15. Presphenoid bone: body; 16. Vomer; 17. Choana; 18. Palatine bone: horizontal and perpendicular plates.</p>
Full article ">Figure 25
<p>Amira representative sagittal multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) CT images at the the level of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses, level I. Images are oriented so that the rostral part is to the right and dorsal is at the top. All views are right lateral. (<b>A</b>): Leopard; (<b>B</b>): Lion; (<b>C</b>): Cheetah and (<b>D</b>): Cat. 1. Nasal bone; 2. Frontal bone: external plate; 3. Frontal bone: internal plate; 4. Ethmoid bone: tectorial plate; 5. Frontal sinus; 6. Ectoturbinates (1st, 2nd and 3rd); 7. Dorsal nasal concha; 8. Middle nasal concha; 9. 3rd endoturbinate; 10. 4th endoturbinate; 11. Ventral nasal concha; 12. Ethmoid bone: cribriform plate; 13. Sphenoidal sinus; 14. Presphenoid bone: body; 15. Basisphenoid bone: body; 16. Occipital bone: basilar part; 17. Choana; 18. Incisive bone: palatine process; 19. Maxilla: palatine process; 20. Palatine bone: horizontal plate; 21. Parietal bone; 22. Occipital bone: squama.</p>
Full article ">Figure 26
<p>Amira representative dorsal multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) CT images at level of the 3rd and 4th endoturbinates, level I. Images are oriented so that the rostral part is at the top. All views are dorsal. (<b>A</b>): Leopard; (<b>B</b>): Lion; (<b>C</b>): Cheetah and (<b>D</b>): Cat. 1. Incisive bone; 2. Maxilla; 3. Common nasal meatus; 4. Ventral nasal concha; 5. Nasal septum; 6. Zygomatic bone: body; 7. Zygomatic bone: temporal process; 8. 3rd endoturbinate; 9. 4th endoturbinate; 10. Frontal bone: orbital surface; 11. Mandible: ramus; 12. Presphenoid bone: wing; 13. Ethmoid bone: perpendicular plate; 14. Ethmoid bone: cribriform plate; 15. Frontal sinus.</p>
Full article ">Figure 27
<p>OsiriX MIP reconstructed CT images of the leopard’s head. (<b>A</b>) Sagittal image. Left lateral view. (<b>B</b>) Transverse image. Caudal view. (<b>C</b>) Dorsal image. Dorsal view. 1. Incisive bone; 2. Nasal bone; 3. Maxilla; 4. Frontal bone: external plate; 5. Frontal bone: internal plate; 6. Frontal bone: orbital surface; 7. Ethmoid bone: tectorial plate; 8. Ethmoid bone: cribriform plate; 9. Frontal sinus; 10. Frontal sinus: septum; 11. 1st ectoturbinate; 12. 2nd ectoturbinate; 13. 3rd ectoturbinate; 14. Dorsal nasal concha; 15. Middle nasal concha; 16. 3rd endoturbinate; 17. 4th endoturbinate; 18. Ventral nasal concha; 19. Ethmoid bone: perpendicular plate; 20. Nasal septum; cartilage; 21. Vomer; 22. Zygomatic bone: body; 23. Sphenoidal sinus; 24. Choana; 25. Palatine bone: horizontal and perpendicular plate; 26. Presphenoid bone.</p>
Full article ">Figure 28
<p>OsiriX MIP reconstructed CT images of the lion’s head. (<b>A</b>) Sagittal image. Left lateral view. (<b>B</b>) Transverse image. Caudal view. (<b>C</b>). Dorsal image. Dorsal view. 1. Incisive bone; 2. Nasal bone; 3. Maxilla; 4. Frontal bone: external plate; 5. Frontal bone: internal plate; 6. Frontal bone: orbital surface; 7. Ethmoid bone: tectorial plate; 8. Ethmoid bone: cribriform plate; 9. Frontal sinus; 10. Frontal sinus: septum; 11. 1st ectoturbinate; 12. 2nd ectoturbinate; 13. 3rd ectoturbinate; 14. Dorsal nasal concha; 15. Middle nasal concha; 16. 3rd endoturbinate; 17. 4th endoturbinate; 18. Ventral nasal concha; 19. Nasal septum: ethmoid bone (perpendicular plate); 20. Nasal septum; cartilage; 21. Vomer; 22. Zygomatic bone: frontal process; 23. Sphenoidal sinus; 24. Choana; 25. Palatine bone: horizontal and perpendicular plate; 26. Presphenoid bone.</p>
Full article ">Figure 29
<p>OsiriX MIP CT reconstruction images of the cheetah’s head. (<b>A</b>) Sagittal image. Left lateral view. (<b>B</b>) Transverse image. Caudal view. (<b>C</b>) Dorsal image. Dorsal view. 1. Incisive bone; 2. Nasal bone; 3. Maxilla; 4. Frontal bone: external plate; 5. Frontal bone: internal plate; 6. Frontal bone: orbital surface; 7. Ethmoid bone: tectorial plate; 8. Ethmoid bone: cribriform plate; 9. Frontal sinus; 10. Frontal sinus: septum; 11. 1st ectoturbinate. 12. 2nd ectoturbinate; 13. 3rd ectoturbinate; 14. Dorsal nasal concha; 15. Middle nasal concha; 16. 3rd endoturbinate; 17. 4th endoturbinate; 18. Ventral nasal concha; 19. Nasal septum: ethmoid bone (perpendicular plate); 20. Nasal septum; cartilage; 21. Vomer; 22. Zygomatic bone: frontal process; 23. Sphenoidal sinus; 24. Choana; 25. Palatine bone: horizontal and perpendicular plates; 26. Presphenoid bone.</p>
Full article ">Figure 30
<p>OsiriX MIP reconstruction images of the cat’s head. (<b>A</b>) Sagittal image. Left lateral view. (<b>B</b>) Transverse image. Caudal view. (<b>C</b>) Dorsal image. Dorsal view. 1. Incisive bone; 2. Nasal bone; 3. Maxilla; 4. Frontal bone: external plate; 5. Frontal bone: internal plate; 6. Frontal bone: orbital surface; 7. Ethmoid bone: tectorial plate; 8. Ethmoid bone: cribriform plate; 9. Frontal sinus; 10. Frontal sinus: septum; 11. 1st ectoturbinate. 12. 2nd ectoturbinate; 13. 3rd ectoturbinate; 14. Dorsal nasal concha; 15. Middle nasal concha; 16. 3rd endoturbinate; 17. 4th endoturbinate; 18. Ventral nasal concha; 19. Nasal septum: ethmoid bone (perpendicular plate); 20. Nasal septum: cartilage; 21. Vomer; 22. Zygomatic bone: body; 23. Sphenoidal sinus; 24. Choana; 25. Palatine bone: horizontal and perpendicular plate; 26. Presphenoid bone.</p>
Full article ">Figure 31
<p>OsiriX 3D reconstructed CT images of the leopard’s head showing the external nares and nasal plane. (<b>A</b>): VR surface reconstruction. Rostral view. (<b>B</b>): VR deep reconstruction. Rostral view. (<b>C</b>) VR deep reconstruction. Right rostrolateral view. a. Root of the nose; b. Dorsum of the nose; c. Tip of the nose; d. Nasal orifice; 1. Nasal bone; 2. Frontal bone; 3. Maxilla; 4. Incisive bone; 5. Nasal cavity; 6. Turbinates.</p>
Full article ">Figure 32
<p>OsiriX 3D reconstructed CT images of the lion’s head showing the external nares and nasal plane. (<b>A</b>): VR surface reconstruction. Rostral view. (<b>B</b>): VR deep reconstruction. Rostral view. (<b>C</b>) VR deep reconstruction. Right rostrolateral view. a. Root of the nose; b. Dorsum of the nose; c. Tip of the nose; d. Nasal orifice; 1. Nasal bone; 2. Frontal bone; 3. Maxilla; 4. Incisive bone; 5. Nasal cavity; 6. Turbinates.</p>
Full article ">Figure 33
<p>OsiriX 3D reconstructed CT images of the cheetah’s head showing the external nares and nasal plane. (<b>A</b>): VR surface reconstruction. Rostral view. (<b>B</b>): VR deep reconstruction. Rostral view. (<b>C</b>) VR deep reconstruction. Right rostrolateral view. a. Root of the nose; b. Dorsum of the nose; c. Tip of the nose; d. Nasal orifice; 1. Nasal bone; 2. Frontal bone; 3. Maxilla; 4. Incisive bone; 5. Nasal cavity; 6. Turbinates.</p>
Full article ">Figure 34
<p>OsiriX 3D reconstructed CT images of the cat’s head showing the external nares and nasal plane. (<b>A</b>): VR surface reconstruction. Rostral view. (<b>B</b>): VR deep reconstruction. Rostral view. (<b>C</b>) VR deep reconstruction. Right rostrolateral view. a. Root of the nose; b. Dorsum of the nose; c. Tip of the nose; d. Nasal orifice; 1. Nasal bone; 2. Frontal bone; 3. Maxilla; 4. Incisive bone; 5. Nasal cavity; 6. Turbinates.</p>
Full article ">Figure 35
<p>OsiriX 3D printing images of the leopard’s head at the level of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. (<b>A</b>) Rostral view so that the dorsal is at the top. (<b>B</b>) Left lateral view so that the rostral part is to the left and the dorsal is at the top. 1. Nasal bone; 2. Frontal bone: external plate; 3. Frontal bone: zygomatic process; 4. Frontal bone: internal plate; 5. Ethmoid bone: cribriform plate; 6. Zygomatic bone: body; 7. Zygomatic bone: temporal process; 8. Zygomatic bone: frontal process; 7. Maxilla; 10. Maxilla: palatine process; 11. Palatine bone: perpendicular and horizontal plates; 12. Presphenoid bone: body; 13. Choana; 14. Frontal sinus; 15. Ethmoid bone: tectorial plate; 16. 1st ectoturbinate; 17. 2nd ectoturbinate; 18. 3rd ectoturbinate; 19. Dorsal nasal concha; 20. Middle nasal concha; 21. 3rd endoturbinate; 22. 4th endoturbinate; 23. Ventral nasal concha; 24. Sphenoidal sinus; 25. Maxillary recess; 26. Vomer; 27. Cerebral fossa; 28. Infraorbital canal.</p>
Full article ">Figure 36
<p>OsiriX 3D printing images of the lion’s head at the level of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. (<b>A</b>) Rostral view so that the dorsal is at the top. (<b>B</b>) Left lateral view so that the rostral part is to the left and the dorsal is at the top. (<b>C</b>) Right lateral view so that the rostral part is to the right and the dorsal is at the top. 1. Nasal bone; 2. Frontal bone: external plate; 3. Frontal bone: zygomatic process; 4. Frontal bone: internal plate; 5. Frontal bone: orbital surface; 6. Temporal bone: squamous part; 7. Temporal bone: zygomatic process; 8. Mandible: ramus; 9. Mandible: angular process; 10. Parietal bone; 11. Occipital bone: nuchal crest; 12. Occipital bone: external occipital protuberance; 13. Occipital bone: squamous part; 14. Osseous tentorium of the cerebellum; 15: Occipital bone: basilar part; 16. Basisphenoid bone: body; 17. Frontal sinus; 18: Frontal sinus: septum; 19. 1st ectoturbinate; 20. 2nd ectoturbinate; 21. 3rd ectoturbinate; 22. Ethmoid bone: tectorial plate; 23. Nasal septum: cartilage; 24. Dorsal nasal concha; 25. Middle nasal concha; 26. 3rd endoturbinate; 27. 4th endoturbinate; 28. Cerebral fossa; 29. Cerebellar fossa.</p>
Full article ">Figure 37
<p>OsiriX 3D printing of the cheetah’s head at the level of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. (<b>A</b>) Rostral view so that the dorsal is at the top. (<b>B</b>) Left lateral view so that the rostral part is to the left and the dorsal is at the top. (<b>C</b>) Right lateral view so that the rostral part is to the right and the dorsal is at the top. 1. Nasal bone; 2. Frontal bone: external plate; 3. Frontal bone: zygomatic process; 4. Frontal bone: internal plate; 5. Frontal bone: orbital surface; 6. Temporal bone: squamous part; 7. Temporal bone: zygomatic process; 8. Mandible: ramus; 9. Mandible: angular process; 10. Mandible: coronoid process; 11. Parietal bone; 12. Occipital bone: nuchal crest; 13. Occipital bone: external occipital protuberance; 14. Occipital bone: squama; 15. Osseous tentorium of the cerebellum; 16: Occipital bone: basilar part; 17. Basisphenoid bone: body; 18. Frontal sinus; 19: Frontal sinus: septum; 20. 1st ectoturbinate; 21. 2nd ectoturbinate; 22. 3rd ectoturbinate; 23. Ethmoid bone: tectorial plate; 24. Nasal septum: cartilage; 25. Dorsal nasal concha; 26. Middle nasal concha; 27. 3rd endoturbinate; 28. 4th endoturbinate; 29. Ventral nasal concha; 30. Sphenoidal sinus; 31. Maxillary recess; 32. Incisive bone: palatine process; 33. Maxilla: palatine process; 34. Palatine bone: horizontal and perpendicular plates; 35. Cerebral fossa; 36. Cerebellar fossa.</p>
Full article ">Figure 38
<p>OsiriX 3D printing of the cat’s head at the level of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. (<b>A</b>) Rostral view so that the dorsal is at the top. (<b>B</b>) Left lateral view so that the rostral part is to the left and the dorsal is at the top. (<b>C</b>) Right lateral view so that the rostral part is to the right and the dorsal is at the top. 1. Nasal bone; 2. Frontal bone: external plate; 3. Frontal bone: zygomatic process; 4. Frontal bone: internal plate; 5. Frontal bone: orbital surface; 6. Temporal bone: squamous part; 7. Temporal bone: zygomatic process; 8. Mandible: ramus (sectioned); 9. Parietal bone; 10. Occipital bone: nuchal crest; 11. Occipital bone: external occipital protuberance; 12. Occipital bone: squama; 13. Osseous tentorium of the cerebellum; 14: Occipital bone: basilar part; 15. Basisphenoid bone: body; 16. Presphenoid bone: body; 17. Frontal sinus; 18: Frontal sinus: septum; 19. 1st ectoturbinate; 20. 2nd ectoturbinate; 21. 3rd ectoturbinate; 22. Ethmoid bone: tectorial plate; 23. Nasal septum: cartilage; 24. Dorsal nasal concha; 25. Middle nasal concha; 26. 3rd endoturbinate; 27. 4th endoturbinate; 28. Ventral nasal concha; 29. Sphenoidal sinus; 30. Maxilla: palatine process; 31. Palatine bone: horizontal and perpendicular plates; 32. Cerebral fossa; 33. Cerebellar fossa.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 1490 KiB  
Article
Compressed SENSitivity Encoding (SENSE): Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis
by Eliseo Picchi, Silvia Minosse, Noemi Pucci, Francesca Di Pietro, Maria Lina Serio, Valentina Ferrazzoli, Valerio Da Ros, Raffaella Giocondo, Francesco Garaci and Francesca Di Giuliano
Diagnostics 2024, 14(15), 1693; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14151693 - 5 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1228
Abstract
Background. This study aimed to qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate T1-TSE, T2-TSE and 3D FLAIR sequences obtained with and without Compressed-SENSE technique by assessing the contrast (C), the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Methods. A total of 142 MRI images were [...] Read more.
Background. This study aimed to qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate T1-TSE, T2-TSE and 3D FLAIR sequences obtained with and without Compressed-SENSE technique by assessing the contrast (C), the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Methods. A total of 142 MRI images were acquired: 69 with Compressed-SENSE and 73 without Compressed-SENSE. All the MRI images were contoured, spatially aligned and co-registered using 3D Slicer Software. Two radiologists manually drew 12 regions of interests on three different structures of CNS: white matter (WM), grey matter (GM) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Results. C values were significantly higher in Compressed-SENSE T1-TSE compared to No Compressed-SENSE T1-TSE for three different structures of the CNS. C values were also significantly lower for Compressed-SENSE 3D FLAIR and Compressed-SENSE T2-TSE compared to the corresponding No Compressed-SENSE scans. While CNR values did not significantly differ in GM-WM between Compressed-SENSE and No Compressed-SENSE for the 3D FLAIR and T1-TSE sequences, the differences in GM-CSF and WM-CSF were always statistically significant. Conclusion. Compressed-SENSE for 3D T2 FLAIR, T1w and T2w sequences enables faster MRI acquisition, reducing scan time and maintaining equivalent image quality. Compressed-SENSE is very useful in specific medical conditions where lower SAR levels are required without sacrificing the acquisition of helpful diagnostic sequences. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advances and Applications in Neuroradiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Comparison between Compressed-SENSE and No Compressed-SENSE sequences in two healthy subjects, both 28 years old. Upper panel: Compressed-SENSE T1-Turbo Spin Echo (TSE) (<b>A</b>), Compressed-SENSE T2-TSE (<b>B</b>) and Compressed-SENSE 3D-T2-FLAIR (<b>C</b>). Lower panel: T1-TSE (<b>D</b>), T2-TSE (<b>E</b>) and 3D-T2-FLAIR (<b>F</b>).</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 3793 KiB  
Technical Note
A Practical Guide to Manual and Semi-Automated Neurosurgical Brain Lesion Segmentation
by Raunak Jain, Faith Lee, Nianhe Luo, Harpreet Hyare and Anand S. Pandit
NeuroSci 2024, 5(3), 265-275; https://doi.org/10.3390/neurosci5030021 - 2 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1329
Abstract
The purpose of the article is to provide a practical guide for manual and semi-automated image segmentation of common neurosurgical cranial lesions, namely meningioma, glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH), for neurosurgical trainees and researchers. Materials and Methods: The medical images used [...] Read more.
The purpose of the article is to provide a practical guide for manual and semi-automated image segmentation of common neurosurgical cranial lesions, namely meningioma, glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH), for neurosurgical trainees and researchers. Materials and Methods: The medical images used were sourced from the Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Interventions Society (MICCAI) Multimodal Brain Tumour Segmentation Challenge (BRATS) image database and from the local Picture Archival and Communication System (PACS) record with consent. Image pre-processing was carried out using MRIcron software (v1.0.20190902). ITK-SNAP (v3.8.0) was used in this guideline due to its availability and powerful built-in segmentation tools, although others (Seg3D, Freesurfer and 3D Slicer) are available. Quality control was achieved by employing expert segmenters to review. Results: A pipeline was developed to demonstrate the pre-processing and manual and semi-automated segmentation of patient images for each cranial lesion, accompanied by image guidance and video recordings. Three sample segmentations were generated to illustrate potential challenges. Advice and solutions were provided within both text and video. Conclusions: Semi-automated segmentation methods enhance efficiency, increase reproducibility, and are suitable to be incorporated into future clinical practise. However, manual segmentation remains a highly effective technique in specific circumstances and provides initial training sets for the development of more advanced semi- and fully automated segmentation algorithms. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>An example image-processing pipeline with image acquisition, pre-processing, segmentation and post-processing stages. (Single column with colour in print).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Manual segmentation of a convexity meningioma. (<b>A</b>) Original MRI. (<b>B</b>) Manual delineation of meningioma outline. (<b>C</b>) Interpolation of lesion through various slices. (single column with colour in print).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Semi-automated segmentation of SAH. (<b>A</b>) Original CT. (<b>B</b>) Manual labelling of different brain tissues, i.e., classification. Red represents cerebrospinal fluid, green represents bone, blue represents brain parenchyma and yellow represents subarachnoid haemorrhage. (<b>C</b>) Evolution of contours. (<b>D</b>) Final segmentation at different levels after manual inspection and editing. (Single column with colour in print).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Semi-automated segmentation of a glioblastoma. (<b>A</b>) Original MRI. (<b>B</b>) Capturing the extent of GBM through classification. Red represents glioblastoma, green represents cerebral oedema, blue represents brain parenchyma and yellow represents cerebrospinal fluid. (<b>C</b>) Derivation of 3D lesion volume. (Single column with colour in print).</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 1909 KiB  
Article
Comparison between Three Radiomics Models and Clinical Nomograms for Prediction of Lymph Node Involvement in PCa Patients Combining Clinical and Radiomic Features
by Domiziana Santucci, Raffaele Ragone, Elva Vergantino, Federica Vaccarino, Francesco Esperto, Francesco Prata, Roberto Mario Scarpa, Rocco Papalia, Bruno Beomonte Zobel, Francesco Rosario Grasso and Eliodoro Faiella
Cancers 2024, 16(15), 2731; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16152731 - 31 Jul 2024
Viewed by 1034
Abstract
PURPOSE: We aim to compare the performance of three different radiomics models (logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM)) and clinical nomograms (Briganti, MSKCC, Yale, and Roach) for predicting lymph node involvement (LNI) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. MATERIALS [...] Read more.
PURPOSE: We aim to compare the performance of three different radiomics models (logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM)) and clinical nomograms (Briganti, MSKCC, Yale, and Roach) for predicting lymph node involvement (LNI) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The retrospective study includes 95 patients who underwent mp-MRI and radical prostatectomy for PCa with pelvic lymphadenectomy. Imaging data (intensity in T2, DWI, ADC, and PIRADS), clinical data (age and pre-MRI PSA), histological data (Gleason score, TNM staging, histological type, capsule invasion, seminal vesicle invasion, and neurovascular bundle involvement), and clinical nomograms (Yale, Roach, MSKCC, and Briganti) were collected for each patient. Manual segmentation of the index lesions was performed for each patient using an open-source program (3D SLICER). Radiomic features were extracted for each segmentation using the Pyradiomics library for each sequence (T2, DWI, and ADC). The features were then selected and used to train and test three different radiomics models (LR, RF, and SVM) independently using ChatGPT software (v 4o). The coefficient value of each feature was calculated (significant value for coefficient ≥ ±0.5). The predictive performance of the radiomics models and clinical nomograms was assessed using accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) (significant value for p ≤ 0.05). Thus, the diagnostic accuracy between the radiomics and clinical models were compared. RESULTS: This study identified 343 features per patient (330 radiomics features and 13 clinical features). The most significant features were T2_nodulofirstordervariance and T2_nodulofirstorderkurtosis. The highest predictive performance was achieved by the RF model with DWI (accuracy 86%, AUC 0.89) and ADC (accuracy 89%, AUC 0.67). Clinical nomograms demonstrated satisfactory but lower predictive performance compared to the RF model in the DWI sequences. CONCLUSIONS: Among the prediction models developed using integrated data (radiomics and semantics), RF shows slightly higher diagnostic accuracy in terms of AUC compared to clinical nomograms in PCa lymph node involvement prediction. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Segmentation of the index prostatic nodule (green zone) in DWI (<b>a</b>), (violet zone) ADC map (<b>b</b>), and (green zone) axial T2 (<b>c</b>), in a 54-year-old patient with a PSA value of 6.1 ng/mL. The histological analysis showed an adenocarcinoma with a Gleason score of 8 (4 + 4), with a positive margin of resection and four lymph nodes at lymphadenectomy. In this case, the random forest applied on DWI sequences predicts the involvement of lymph nodes with a confidence of 86%, a logistic regression of 67%, and an SVM of 30%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Prostatic nodule (green zone) in DWI (<b>a</b>), (violet zone) ADC map (<b>b</b>), and (green zone) axial T2 (<b>c</b>), in a 55-year-old patient with a PSA value of 2.5 ng/mL. The histological analysis showed an adenocarcinoma with a Gleason score of 6 (3 + 3), without lymph node involvement at lymphadenectomy. In this case, the random forest in DWI predicts the involvement of lymph nodes with a confidence of 85%, a logistic regression of 69%, and an SVM of 32%.</p>
Full article ">
10 pages, 4375 KiB  
Article
Deep Learning in Cardiothoracic Ratio Calculation and Cardiomegaly Detection
by Jakub Kufel, Iga Paszkiewicz, Szymon Kocot, Anna Lis, Piotr Dudek, Łukasz Czogalik, Michał Janik, Katarzyna Bargieł-Łączek, Wiktoria Bartnikowska, Maciej Koźlik, Maciej Cebula, Katarzyna Gruszczyńska and Zbigniew Nawrat
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(14), 4180; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13144180 - 17 Jul 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1383
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of our deep learning algorithm in calculating cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) and thus in the assessment of cardiomegaly or pericardial effusion occurrences on chest radiography (CXR). Methods: From a database of [...] Read more.
Objectives: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of our deep learning algorithm in calculating cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) and thus in the assessment of cardiomegaly or pericardial effusion occurrences on chest radiography (CXR). Methods: From a database of 8000 CXRs, 13 folders with a comparable number of images were created. Then, 1020 images were chosen randomly, in proportion to the number of images in each folder. Afterward, CTR was calculated using RadiAnt Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Viewer software (2023.1). Next, heart and lung anatomical areas were marked in 3D Slicer. From these data, we trained an AI model which segmented heart and lung anatomy and determined the CTR value. Results: Our model achieved an Intersection over Union metric of 88.28% for the augmented training subset and 83.06% for the validation subset. F1-score for subsets were accordingly 90.22% and 90.67%. In the comparative analysis of artificial intelligence (AI) vs. humans, significantly lower transverse thoracic diameter (TTD) (p < 0.001), transverse cardiac diameter (TCD) (p < 0.001), and CTR (p < 0.001) values obtained using the neural network were observed. Conclusions: Results confirm that there is a significant correlation between the measurements made by human observers and the neural network. After validation in clinical conditions, our method may be used as a screening test or advisory tool when a specialist is not available, especially on Intensive Care Units (ICUs) or Emergency Departments (ERs) where time plays a key role. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic AI in Medical Imaging and Image Processing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>How measurements were manually determined using RadiAnt: blue vertical line—a line drawn through the spinous processes of the thoracic spine vertebrae; a—right side of the heart; b—left side of the heart; a + b = the widest dimension of the heart; c—the widest dimension of the chest.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>How annotations were applied to the anatomical areas of the heart (green) and lungs (purple).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Metrics, loss, and learning rate during neural network training.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Difference in mean obtained by the humans observers and AI in the cardiothoracic ratio.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Difference between the human observers in the cardiothoracic ratio.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Correlation of the mean obtained by the human observers and AI for the cardiothoracic ratio.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 5379 KiB  
Article
Evolutionary Specializations in the Venous Anatomy of the Two-Toed Sloth (Choloepus didactylus): Insights from CT-scan 3D Reconstructions
by Paul Martre, Baptiste Mulot, Edouard Roussel and Antoine Leclerc
Animals 2024, 14(12), 1768; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14121768 - 12 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1506
Abstract
The venous anatomy of the two-toed sloth (Choloepus didactylus) remains poorly understood, particularly in living specimens due to the limitations of traditional cadaveric studies. This study aims to describe the unique venous structures of Choloepus didactylus using computed tomography, enhancing our [...] Read more.
The venous anatomy of the two-toed sloth (Choloepus didactylus) remains poorly understood, particularly in living specimens due to the limitations of traditional cadaveric studies. This study aims to describe the unique venous structures of Choloepus didactylus using computed tomography, enhancing our understanding of this species in a live setting. Three living Choloepus didactylus underwent CT scans as part of routine clinical assessments. The images were reconstructed using 3D Slicer software (version 5.6.2), focusing on the caudal vena cava anatomy. The reconstructions confirmed the presence of a significant intravertebral vein, showing complex venous connections through the ventral sacral foramen and vertebral foramina. These findings highlight notable anatomical variations and challenge existing literature on the species’ venous architecture. By employing modern imaging technologies, this research provides new insights into the venous anatomy of Choloepus didactylus, demonstrating the value of non-invasive techniques in studying the anatomical features of live animals, thereby offering a foundation for further comparative and evolutionary studies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Mammals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Phylogeny of Xenarthra.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Bones and venous system 3D reconstruction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Bones, venous system, kidneys, and liver 3D reconstruction, right lateral view.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Pelvic bones, kidney, and venous system 3D reconstruction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Subject 1 vertebral foramina, L3 level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Three-dimensional representation of venous circulation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Three-dimensional reconstruction of subject 1 after CT scan in suspended position.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 3856 KiB  
Review
Advances in 3D Inner Ear Reconstruction Software for Cochlear Implants: A Comprehensive Review
by Michail Athanasopoulos, Pinelopi Samara and Ioannis Athanasopoulos
Methods Protoc. 2024, 7(3), 46; https://doi.org/10.3390/mps7030046 - 23 May 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1919
Abstract
Auditory impairment stands as a pervasive global issue, exerting significant effects on individuals’ daily functioning and interpersonal engagements. Cochlear implants (CIs) have risen as a cutting-edge solution for severe to profound hearing loss, directly stimulating the auditory nerve with electrical signals. The success [...] Read more.
Auditory impairment stands as a pervasive global issue, exerting significant effects on individuals’ daily functioning and interpersonal engagements. Cochlear implants (CIs) have risen as a cutting-edge solution for severe to profound hearing loss, directly stimulating the auditory nerve with electrical signals. The success of CI procedures hinges on precise pre-operative planning and post-operative evaluation, highlighting the significance of advanced three-dimensional (3D) inner ear reconstruction software. Accurate pre-operative imaging is vital for identifying anatomical landmarks and assessing cochlear deformities. Tools like 3D Slicer, Amira and OTOPLAN provide detailed depictions of cochlear anatomy, aiding surgeons in simulating implantation scenarios and refining surgical approaches. Post-operative scans play a crucial role in detecting complications and ensuring CI longevity. Despite technological advancements, challenges such as standardization and optimization persist. This review explores the role of 3D inner ear reconstruction software in patient selection, surgical planning, and post-operative assessment, tracing its evolution and emphasizing features like image segmentation and virtual simulation. It addresses software limitations and proposes solutions, advocating for their integration into clinical practice. Ultimately, this review underscores the impact of 3D inner ear reconstruction software on cochlear implantation, connecting innovation with precision medicine. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Biomedical Sciences and Physiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>Top</b>): Three-dimensional inner ear reconstruction with optimal trajectory calculation. Shown anatomical structures: cochlea (red), inner auditory meatus (light green), vestibulum and semicircular canals (brown), facial nerve (yellow), chorda tympani (orange), ossicle chain (purple), and bony overhang (dark green). (<b>Bottom</b>): Image fusion showing 0.60 mm CT (yellow) and T2 weighted MRI (blue) in the oblique coronal view. Analyses and images were generated with OTOPLAN V4 (3.0.0).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic representation of the integration of established imaging modalities (like CT and MRI) with advanced 3D inner ear reconstruction software in cochlear implantation [created with <a href="https://app.biorender.com/illustrations" target="_blank">https://app.biorender.com/illustrations</a> (accessed on 5 April 2024)].</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 3278 KiB  
Article
Prediction of Seropositivity in Suspected Autoimmune Encephalitis by Use of Radiomics: A Radiological Proof-of-Concept Study
by Jacob Stake, Christine Spiekers, Burak Han Akkurt, Walter Heindel, Tobias Brix, Manoj Mannil and Manfred Musigmann
Diagnostics 2024, 14(11), 1070; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14111070 - 21 May 2024
Viewed by 1391
Abstract
In this study, we sought to evaluate the capabilities of radiomics and machine learning in predicting seropositivity in patients with suspected autoimmune encephalitis (AE) from MR images obtained at symptom onset. In 83 patients diagnosed with AE between 2011 and 2022, manual bilateral [...] Read more.
In this study, we sought to evaluate the capabilities of radiomics and machine learning in predicting seropositivity in patients with suspected autoimmune encephalitis (AE) from MR images obtained at symptom onset. In 83 patients diagnosed with AE between 2011 and 2022, manual bilateral segmentation of the amygdala was performed on pre-contrast T2 images using 3D Slicer open-source software. Our sample of 83 patients contained 43 seropositive and 40 seronegative AE cases. Images were obtained at our tertiary care center and at various secondary care centers in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. The sample was randomly split into training data and independent test data. A total of 107 radiomic features were extracted from bilateral regions of interest (ROIs). Automated machine learning (AutoML) was used to identify the most promising machine learning algorithms. Feature selection was performed using recursive feature elimination (RFE) and based on the determination of the most important features. Selected features were used to train various machine learning algorithms on 100 different data partitions. Performance was subsequently evaluated on independent test data. Our radiomics approach was able to predict the presence of autoantibodies in the independent test samples with a mean AUC of 0.90, a mean accuracy of 0.83, a mean sensitivity of 0.84 and a mean specificity of 0.82, with Lasso regression models yielding the most promising results. These results indicate that radiomics-based machine learning could be a promising tool in predicting the presence of autoantibodies in suspected AE patients. Given the implications of seropositivity for definitive diagnosis of suspected AE cases, this may expedite diagnostic workup even before results from specialized laboratory testing can be obtained. Furthermore, in conjunction with recent publications, our results indicate that characterization of AE subtypes by use of radiomics may become possible in the future, potentially allowing physicians to tailor treatment in the spirit of personalized medicine even before laboratory workup is completed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advances and Applications in Neuroradiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) T2-image of a 54-year-old seropositive AE patient who presented with serial seizures. Left-leading hyperintensity and enlargement of the mesial temporal lobe. (<b>b</b>) Corresponding fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequence in the coronal plane showing bilateral hyperintensity of the mesial temporal lobe.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flowchart describing the methodological approach. For each tested machine learning algorithm (i.e., GBM, neural network, Lasso regression, ridge regression, and an elastic net), a total of 16 models was developed, including an increasing number (1 to 15) of model features on the one hand and the features determined using RFE (recursive feature elimination) on the other. We developed each of our models 100 times (100 cycles). For each of these 100 cycles, a new data partitioning was carried out and the associated model was subsequently tested with independent test data. The final model performance was finally calculated as the average value of the previous 100 cycles, based on the independent test data used in each cycle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Prediction of seropositivity (detectable/no detectable antibodies) in patients with suspected autoimmune encephalitis: Area under the curve (AUC) and accuracy for the independent test samples, calculated as means of 100 repetitions (100 cycles) depending on the number of model features included. Five different machine learning algorithms (as indicated in the figures) were tested for feature preselection and subsequent model construction. Each individual curve describes the discriminatory power achieved with the corresponding machine learning algorithm as a function of the number of features included.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Prediction of seropositivity (detectable/no detectable antibodies) in patients with suspected autoimmune encephalitis: Sensitivity and specificity for the independent test samples, calculated as means of 100 repetitions (100 cycles) depending on the number of model features included. Five different machine learning algorithms (as indicated in the figures) were tested for feature preselection and subsequent model construction. Each individual curve describes the discriminatory power achieved with the corresponding machine learning algorithm as a function of the number of features included.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Prediction of seropositivity (detectable/no detectable antibodies) in patients with suspected autoimmune encephalitis. The positive predictive value and the negative predictive value were calculated as averages of 100 cycles based on independent test samples (see text). Five different machine learning algorithms (as indicated in the figures) were tested for feature preselection and subsequent model construction. Each individual curve describes the discriminatory power achieved with the corresponding machine learning algorithm as a function of the number of features included.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop