[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Explore Sustainable Development in Multiple Dimensions for Human Well-Being

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Health, Well-Being and Sustainability".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 April 2025 | Viewed by 2647

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Center for Development Research, University of Applied Sciences and Arts (HSBI), Bielefeld, Germany
Interests: sustainable development; global agendas for sustainability; SDGs; science diplomacy; eco-design

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Work & Engineering Psychology, South Westphalia University of Applied Sciences, Meschede, Germany
Interests: environmental psychology; Society 5.0; human wellbeing at work; human agent teaming

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Research on the intersection between well-being and sustainable development is gaining more attention in light of increasing global challenges and the pressure to achieve global commitments for sustainability. Environmental psychology, which explores the relationship between humans and the external world, in the last decade, has been more sustainability- and policy-oriented, encompassing sustainability at larger levels of analysis and life domains beyond resource management, as well as in an interdisciplinary context.

Expanding environmental psychology to embrace multiple dimensions of sustainable development can be important for understanding the tensions that arise between needed action and challenging behavior changes. These can be seen as requirements that reduce subjective well-being, as ecosystem degradation does not have an immediate effect on well-being, and because critical sustainability transformations will trigger individual and collective action.

In this regard, this Special Issue is focused on exploring the intricate connection of multiple dimensions of sustainable development and human well-being. Global priorities have shifted toward well-being and sustainable development, which are both priorities in global agendas but are somehow pursued in separate directions.

This collection of works aims to advance research in this field and contribute to synergizing sustainability and well-being research agendas. The aim is to do so by showcasing articles from various disciplines, including environmental psychology in an interdisciplinary context, that challenge concepts of sustainability even beyond the triangular framing, considering a broad definition of well-being that is not only limited to a state of existence that fulfills various human needs (having, loving, being, and doing). In this way, we can embrace the idea that human well-being is inseparable from the nature and vitality of ecosystems.

Research areas may include (but are not limited to) the following:

  1. Exploring the well-being-related dimension of sustainability in relation to current global challenges and solutions to multilevel, interdisciplinary impact assessments (including time delay effects).
  2. Understanding mixed effects: human wellbeing as a result and/or a condition of and/or a threat to sustainable development.
  3. The dimension of human well-being in the Sustainable Development Goals—SDGs (i.e., SDG12 and SDG13), missing elements, contradictions and synergies, context dependencies, policy guidance, etc.
  4. Sustainable alternative forms of living in non-urban environments and their impact on human well-being/quality of life.
  5. Sustainability and human–nature relations through lenses of biophilic design.
  6. Consequences of pandemic restrictions for awareness raising regarding the interdependence of well-being and natural ecosystems.
  7. Impact of the language used to talk about sustainability in changing subjective perspectives of human well-being in society.
  8. Choice of language and its impact on perceptions of sustainability and related attitudes and behaviors (i.e., sentiments of sustainability, metaphorical expressions of sustainability and beyond).
  9. Analyses of a range of contemporary concepts that relate to “sustainability” and “well-being”.
  10. AI as a tool for the identification of commonalities across definitions related to well-being and sustainability.
  11. Unsustainable aspects of AI for quality of life/well-being and environmental relations, as technology and innovation have, to some extend, decoupled well-being from nature.
  12. Exploring the links between well-being/quality of life and sustainability through the perspective of Gen-Z.
  13. The inter-relation of well-being and sustainability in post-pandemic recovery processes (policies, plans, strategies, etc.).
  14. The employee's well-being in the sustainability strategies/reports of companies and comparisons of the sustainability reports/strategies of companies.

Dr. Kalterina Shulla
Prof. Dr. Bernd Friedrich Voigt
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • human well-being
  • sustainable development
  • environmental psychology
  • resilience
  • AI
  • interdisciplinary
  • subjective well-being
  • language
  • sustainability

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

32 pages, 7229 KiB  
Article
Resilience as a Concept for Convergence Across Health, Systems, and Well-Being: An AI-Augmented Mapping of 50 Years of Resilience Research
by Elizabeth Ekren, Maria E. Tomasso and Melinda M. Villagran
Sustainability 2024, 16(23), 10333; https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310333 - 26 Nov 2024
Viewed by 653
Abstract
Resilience has become a focal point of academic research investigating the impact of adverse disruption to the well-being of people, systems, the built environment, ecosystems, and climate. However, the proliferation of this work has not been accompanied by increasing clarity about the core [...] Read more.
Resilience has become a focal point of academic research investigating the impact of adverse disruption to the well-being of people, systems, the built environment, ecosystems, and climate. However, the proliferation of this work has not been accompanied by increasing clarity about the core meaning of resilience as a singular construct, threatening its relevance and complicating its use in practice. To improve the application of resilience in cross-disciplinary and convergence approaches to sustainability and well-being research, this work synthesized resilience conceptualizations across disciplines with novel artificial intelligence (AI)-augmented approaches. Using open-source applications for text mining and machine-learning-based natural language processing algorithms for the examination of text-as-data, this work mapped the content of 50 years of academic resilience work (24,732 abstracts). Presented as thematic and statistical textual associations in a series of network maps and tables, the findings highlight how specific measurements, components, and terminologies of resilience relate to one another within and across disciplines, emphasizing what concepts can be used to bridge disciplinary boundaries. From this, a converged conceptualization is derived to answer theoretical questions about the nature of resilience and define it as a dynamic process of control through the stages of disruption and progression to an improved state thereafter. This conceptualization supports a cross-disciplinary meaning of resilience that can enhance its shared understanding among a variety of stakeholders, and ultimately, the rigor and uniformity of its application in addressing sustainability and well-being challenges across multiple domains. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Text retrieval, cleaning, and analysis process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>VOS Viewer network map with article title keyword co-occurrences. Title field pulled with binary counting, minimum occurrences of 10 (1150 total); top 60% (690) most relevant kept.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Leximancer semantic map of resilience research abstracts. Themes shown at 25%. Concepts shown at 0%. Concept dot size reflects extent to which concept co-occurs with others.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Leximancer semantic map of resilience research abstracts. Themes shown at 25%. Concepts shown at 100%. Concept dot size reflects extent to which concept co-occurs with others.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>VOS Viewer network map of abstracts with journal title key word co-occurrences. Journal title field pulled with 632 keywords with 280 manually selected for field indication.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>VOS Viewer network map of abstracts published prior to 2000 with title keyword co-occurrences. Title field pulled with binary counting, minimum occurrences of 3 (25 total); all relevant kept.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>VOS Viewer network map of abstracts published between 2000 and 2009 with title keyword co-occurrences. Title field pulled with binary counting, minimum occurrences of 5 (64 total); all relevant kept.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>VOS Viewer network map of abstracts published between 2010 and 2019 with title keyword co-occurrences. Title field pulled with binary counting, minimum occurrences of 10 (287 total); top 60% (172) most relevant kept.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>VOS Viewer network map of abstracts published 2020 and later with title keyword co-occurrences. Title field pulled with binary counting, minimum occurrences of 10 (847 total); top 60% (508) most relevant kept.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 3928 KiB  
Article
Analysis of the Factors Influencing the Purchase of Electric Vehicles in Brazil
by Marceli Adriane Schvartz, Lucas Veiga Avila, Walter Leal Filho, Luciane Neves Canha, Julio Cezar Mairesse Siluk, Thiago Antônio Beuron Corrêa de Barros, Luis Felipe Dias Lopes and Elda Rodrigues Steinhorst Kraetzig
Sustainability 2024, 16(22), 9957; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16229957 - 15 Nov 2024
Viewed by 841
Abstract
The transport sector, and especially the increase in individual vehicle ownership, contribute significantly to air pollution. The transition to electric vehicles (EVs) is seen as a sustainable alternative to reduce emissions of polluting gases. However, in Brazil, the EV market has not yet [...] Read more.
The transport sector, and especially the increase in individual vehicle ownership, contribute significantly to air pollution. The transition to electric vehicles (EVs) is seen as a sustainable alternative to reduce emissions of polluting gases. However, in Brazil, the EV market has not yet reached a significant size. Given this scenario, this study aims to analyze the factors that influence the decision to buy EVs in Brazil, highlighting personal, psychological, economic, performance, and environmental variables and barriers. The aim is also to develop a model with guidelines that can help stakeholders. The quantitative stage of the study involved a survey of 514 respondents. The data were analyzed using statistical methods, including structural equation modeling (SEM), which allowed for a deeper investigation of the proposed hypotheses. The survey findings reveal that, in the Brazilian context, performance factors—such as autonomy, availability of recharging infrastructure, and maintenance—are the main drivers influencing EV purchase decisions. Environmental factors, including energy reuse, pollution reduction, and minimizing environmental impacts, have also gained significant importance. Economic factors are crucial, particularly concerning cost–benefit perceptions. The differences between Brazil and other regions highlight the importance of accounting for cultural and economic variations when analyzing consumer behavior towards EVs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Global electric car stock, 2013–2023. Source: [<a href="#B12-sustainability-16-09957" class="html-bibr">12</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Stages of the methodology.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Factors and variables selected by the systematic literature review.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Conceptual model of the hypotheses.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Proposed model and its hypotheses. Software SmartPLS<sup>®</sup> v, 4.0.9.9 [<a href="#B53-sustainability-16-09957" class="html-bibr">53</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Final structural model. Software SmartPLS<sup>®</sup> v, 4.0.9.9 [<a href="#B53-sustainability-16-09957" class="html-bibr">53</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Key factors and variables.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Guidelines for personal factors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Guidelines for performance factors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Guidelines for environmental factors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Guidelines for barriers.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop