[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Coordination Compounds

A special issue of Magnetochemistry (ISSN 2312-7481). This special issue belongs to the section "Magnetic Resonances".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 January 2025 | Viewed by 7107

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Multidisciplinary Institute of Chemistry, Multidisciplinary Center UFRJ-Macaé, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Macaé, RJ, Brazil
Interests: quantum chemistry; relativistic quantum chemistry; computa-tional chemistry; DFT; basis sets; heavy nuclei; transition metal complexes; NMR; nonlinear optics
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Chemistry, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil
Interests: molecular dynamics; quantum mechanics; docking; carbon materials; medicinal chemistry; metallodrugs
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Coordination compounds are of great interest in chemistry due to their variety of applications, including catalysis, advanced materials, and medicinal chemistry. Considering the constant interest in the understanding of the structure and properties of coordination compounds, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is a powerful and versatile technique used in the characterization of the reaction mechanism and properties of these compounds. Although most studies using NMR focus on the ligands coordinated to the central atom, there are a wide range of central atoms, such as the transition metals, that also have advantageous properties for their use in NMR.

This Special Issue aims to publish a collection of experimental and/or computational papers covering solution or solid-state NMR spectroscopy applied to coordination compounds. Research articles, short communications, and reviews are welcome. This Special Issue in the Open Access journal Magnetochemistry aims to expand on the topic of magnetic resonance in chemistry.

Prof. Dr. Diego Paschoal
Prof. Dr. Hélio Dos Santos
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Magnetochemistry is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy
  • solution-state NMR
  • solid-state NMR
  • transition metal complexes
  • heavy nuclei
  • structure
  • advanced NMR techniques
  • theoretical models and calculations

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

19 pages, 13319 KiB  
Article
Assessment of a Computational Protocol for Predicting Co-59 NMR Chemical Shift
by Matheus G. R. Gomes, Andréa L. F. De Souza, Hélio F. Dos Santos, Wagner B. De Almeida and Diego F. S. Paschoal
Magnetochemistry 2023, 9(7), 172; https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry9070172 - 2 Jul 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2192
Abstract
In the present study, we benchmark computational protocols for predicting Co-59 NMR chemical shift. Quantum mechanical calculations based on density functional theory were used, in conjunction with our NMR-DKH basis sets for all atoms, including Co, which were developed in the present study. [...] Read more.
In the present study, we benchmark computational protocols for predicting Co-59 NMR chemical shift. Quantum mechanical calculations based on density functional theory were used, in conjunction with our NMR-DKH basis sets for all atoms, including Co, which were developed in the present study. The best protocol included the geometry optimization at BLYP/def2-SVP/def2-SVP/IEF-PCM(UFF) and shielding constant calculation at GIAO-LC-ωPBE/NMR-DKH/IEF-PCM(UFF). This computational scheme was applied to a set of 34 Co(III) complexes, in which, Co-59 NMR chemical shift ranges from +1162 ppm to +15,100 ppm, and these were obtained in distinct solvents (water and organic solvents). The resulting mean absolute deviation (MAD), mean relative deviation (MRD), and coefficient of determination (R2) were 158 ppm, 3.0%, and 0.9966, respectively, suggesting an excellent alternative for studying Co-59 NMR. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Coordination Compounds)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Co(III) complexes considered in the initial set of the benchmarking. The geometries were optimized at BLYP/def2-SVP/def2-SVP/IEF-PCM(UFF) level: (<b>a</b>) Ref—[Co(CN)<sub>6</sub>]<sup>3−</sup>, (<b>b</b>) Cpx01—[Co(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>6</sub>]<sup>3+</sup>, (<b>c</b>) Cpx02—[Co(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>5</sub>Cl]<sup>2+</sup>, (<b>d</b>) Cpx03—[Co(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>5</sub>(NO<sub>2</sub>)]<sup>2+</sup>, (<b>e</b>) Cpx04—[Co(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>5</sub>(SCN)]<sup>2+</sup>, and (<b>f</b>) Cpx05—[Co(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>5</sub>(NCS)]<sup>2+</sup>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Mean relative deviation (MRD, %) for the structural parameters of Co(III) complexes calculated at <b>DFT-Functional</b>/def2-SVP/def2-SVP/IEF-PCM(UFF) level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Mean relative deviation (MRD, %) for the structural parameters of Co(III) complexes calculated at <b>DFT-Functional</b>/def2-SVP/def2-SVP/IEF-PCM(UFF) level, and MRD for the δ<sup>59</sup>Co calculated at GIAO-PBE/NMR-DKH/IEF-PCM(UFF) level. The DFT functionals in the X-axis refer to the level used for geometry optimization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Correlation between the experimental and calculated (Model 1) δ<sup>59</sup>Co (ppm) for all 34 Co(III) complexes studied in the present paper. The level of theory was GIAO-LC-ωPBE/NMR-DKH/IEF-PCM(UFF)//BLYP/def2-SVP/def2-SVP/IEF-PCM(UFF).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Calculated δ<sup>59</sup>Co (ppm) with Model 1, GIAO-LC-ωPBE/NMR-DKH/IEF-PCM(UFF)//BLYP/def2-SVP/def2-SVP/IEF-PCM(UFF), for all six cobaloximes studied in the present paper.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 954 KiB  
Article
NMR Magnetic Shielding in Transition Metal Compounds Containing Cadmium, Platinum, and Mercury
by Andy D. Zapata-Escobar, Alejandro F. Maldonado, Jose L. Mendoza-Cortes and Gustavo A. Aucar
Magnetochemistry 2023, 9(7), 165; https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry9070165 - 27 Jun 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1602
Abstract
In this article, we delve into the intricate behavior of electronic mechanisms underlying NMR magnetic shieldings σ in molecules containing heavy atoms, such as cadmium, platinum, and mercury. Specifically, we explore PtXn2 (X = F, Cl, Br, I; [...] Read more.
In this article, we delve into the intricate behavior of electronic mechanisms underlying NMR magnetic shieldings σ in molecules containing heavy atoms, such as cadmium, platinum, and mercury. Specifically, we explore PtXn2 (X = F, Cl, Br, I; n = 4, 6) and XCl2Te2Y2H6 (X = Cd, Hg; Y = N, P) molecular systems. It is known that the leading electronic mechanisms responsible for the relativistic effects on σ are well characterized by the linear response with elimination of small components model (LRESC). In this study, we present the results obtained from the innovative LRESC-Loc model, which offers the same outcomes as the LRESC model but employs localized molecular orbitals (LMOs) instead of canonical MOs. These LMOs provide a chemist’s representation of atomic core, lone pairs, and bonds. The whole set of electronic mechanisms responsible of the relativistic effects can be expressed in terms of both non-ligand-dependent and ligand-dependent contributions. We elucidate the electronic origins of trends and behaviors exhibited by these diverse mechanisms in the aforementioned molecular systems. In PtX42 molecules, the predominant relativistic mechanism is the well-established one-body spin–orbit (σSO(1)) mechanism, while the paramagnetic mass–velocity (σMv) and Darwin (σDw) contributing mechanisms also demand consideration. However, in PtX62 molecules, the σ(Mv/Dw) contribution surpasses that of the SO(1) mechanism, thus influencing the overall ligand-dependent contributions. As for complexes containing Cd and Hg, the ligand-dependent contributions exhibit similar magnitudes when nitrogen is substituted with phosphorus. The only discrepancy arises from the σSO(1) contribution, which changes sign between the two molecules due to the contribution of bond orbitals between the metal and tellurium atoms. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Coordination Compounds)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Representation of the molecular structures for Pt<span class="html-italic">X</span><math display="inline"><semantics><msubsup><mrow/><mn>4</mn><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>2</mn></mrow></msubsup></semantics></math>, Pt<span class="html-italic">X</span><math display="inline"><semantics><msubsup><mrow/><mn>6</mn><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>2</mn></mrow></msubsup></semantics></math> (<span class="html-italic">X</span> = Cl, Br, I), and Cl<math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mrow/><mn>2</mn></msub></semantics></math><span class="html-italic">X</span>Te<math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mrow/><mn>2</mn></msub></semantics></math><span class="html-italic">Y</span><math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mrow/><mn>2</mn></msub></semantics></math>H<math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mrow/><mn>6</mn></msub></semantics></math> (<span class="html-italic">X</span> = Cd, Hg; <span class="html-italic">Y</span> = N, P) systems.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Chemical shift results for platinum <math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>δ</mi><mo>(</mo><mi>P</mi><mi>t</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></semantics></math> calculated at LRESC and 4c-RPA levels. Experimental values are also included. All values are given in ppm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Contributions of core orbitals, bond orbitals, and lone-pair orbitals to the <math display="inline"><semantics><msubsup><mi>σ</mi><mi>p</mi><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>M</mi><mi>v</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>D</mi><mi>w</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></msubsup></semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics><msup><mi>σ</mi><mrow><mi>S</mi><mi>O</mi><mo>(</mo><mn>1</mn><mo>)</mo></mrow></msup></semantics></math> mechanisms on Pt in Pt<math display="inline"><semantics><msubsup><mi>X</mi><mn>4</mn><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>2</mn></mrow></msubsup></semantics></math> (<b>left</b>) and Pt<math display="inline"><semantics><msubsup><mi>X</mi><mn>6</mn><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>2</mn></mrow></msubsup></semantics></math> (<b>right</b>) molecules. The <math display="inline"><semantics><msup><mi>σ</mi><mrow><mi>P</mi><mi>S</mi><mi>O</mi><mo>−</mo><mi>K</mi></mrow></msup></semantics></math> mechanism is also displayed for Pt<math display="inline"><semantics><msubsup><mi>X</mi><mn>6</mn><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>2</mn></mrow></msubsup></semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Contributions of <math display="inline"><semantics><msup><mi>σ</mi><mrow><mi>S</mi><mi>O</mi><mo>(</mo><mn>1</mn><mo>)</mo></mrow></msup></semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics><msubsup><mi>σ</mi><mi>p</mi><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>M</mi><mi>v</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>D</mi><mi>w</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></msubsup></semantics></math> to <math display="inline"><semantics><msup><mi>σ</mi><mrow><mi>l</mi><mi>i</mi><mi>g</mi><mi>a</mi><mi>n</mi><mi>d</mi></mrow></msup></semantics></math> in Pt<math display="inline"><semantics><msubsup><mi>X</mi><mn>4</mn><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>2</mn></mrow></msubsup></semantics></math> (<b>left</b>) and Pt<math display="inline"><semantics><msubsup><mi>X</mi><mn>6</mn><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>2</mn></mrow></msubsup></semantics></math> (<b>right</b>) molecules. All values are given in ppm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Ligand-dependent contributions to <math display="inline"><semantics><mi>σ</mi></semantics></math>(Te), <math display="inline"><semantics><mi>σ</mi></semantics></math>(Cd), and <math display="inline"><semantics><mi>σ</mi></semantics></math>(Hg) in the Cl<math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mrow/><mn>2</mn></msub></semantics></math>XTe<math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mrow/><mn>2</mn></msub></semantics></math>Y<math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mrow/><mn>2</mn></msub></semantics></math>H<math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mrow/><mn>6</mn></msub></semantics></math> molecular systems using localized molecular orbitals.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 4311 KiB  
Article
Improving the Path to Obtain Spectroscopic Parameters for the PI3K—(Platinum Complex) System: Theoretical Evidences for Using 195Pt NMR as a Probe
by Taináh M. R. Santos, Gustavo A. Andolpho, Camila A. Tavares, Mateus A. Gonçalves and Teodorico C. Ramalho
Magnetochemistry 2023, 9(4), 89; https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry9040089 - 26 Mar 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1723
Abstract
The absence of adequate force field (FF) parameters to describe certain metallic complexes makes new and deeper analyses impossible. In this context, after a group of researchers developed and validated an AMBER FF for a platinum complex (PC) conjugated with AHBT, new possibilities [...] Read more.
The absence of adequate force field (FF) parameters to describe certain metallic complexes makes new and deeper analyses impossible. In this context, after a group of researchers developed and validated an AMBER FF for a platinum complex (PC) conjugated with AHBT, new possibilities emerged. Thus, in this work, we propose an improved path to obtain NMR spectroscopic parameters, starting from a specific FF for PC, allowing to obtain more reliable information and a longer simulation time. Initially, a docking study was carried out between a PC and PI3K enzyme, aiming to find the most favorable orientation and, from this pose, to carry out a simulation of classical molecular dynamics (MD) with an explicit solvent and simulation time of 50 ns. To explore a new PC environment, a second MD simulation was performed only between the complex and water molecules, under the same conditions as the first MD. After the results of the two MDs, we proposed strategies to select the best amino acid residues (first MD) and water molecules (second MD) through the analyses of hydrogen bonds and minimum distance distribution functions (MDDFs), respectively. In addition, we also selected the best frames from the two MDs through the OWSCA algorithm. From these resources, it was possible to reduce the amount and computational cost of subsequent quantum calculations. Thus, we performed NMR calculations in two chemical environments, enzymatic and aqueous, with theory level GIAO–PBEPBE/NMR-DKH. So, from a strategic path, we were able to obtain more reliable chemical shifts and, therefore, propose safer spectroscopic probes, showing a large difference between the values of chemical shifts in the enzymatic and aqueous environments. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Coordination Compounds)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Three-dimensional structure of the <span class="html-italic">cis</span>-dichloro(2-aminomethylpyridine) platinum(II) bonded to 2-(4′-amino2′-hydroxyphenyl)benzothiazole (AHBT).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Overlapping of the selected pose (purple) and the PI3K active ligand (<span class="html-italic">N</span>-(6-[2-(methylsulfanyl)pyrimidin-4-yl]-1,3-benzothiazol-2-yl) acetamide) (yellow).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Best pose obtained by the docking study. At the bottom left, Val882 residue is forming two H-Bonds (2.31 Å and 2.56 Å) with PC. At the bottom right, an H-Bond (2.96 Å) can be seen between the Glu880 residue and PC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>RMSD vs. Time. The behavior of PC is shown in blue and, in red, the evolution over time of the PI3K.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Two hydrogen bonds with higher frequency of occurrence between the PC and Val882 residue (1.93 Å and 1.86 Å) during the MD simulation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Bond lengths versus time of the two H-bonds with the highest frequency of occurrence in the MD simulation. (<b>a</b>) PC:H24···O:Val882; and (<b>b</b>) Val882:H···O48:PC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Minimum Distance Distribution Function of water with respect to PC. (<b>a</b>) Contribution of O (red) and H (green) atoms to the total function (blue). (<b>b</b>) Contribution of the PC atoms to the total function (blue).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Energies of the systems studied (original and compressed) at each moment. (<b>a</b>) First MD with PC and PI3K; (<b>b</b>) Second MD with PC and water molecules.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Reduced system of PC:PI3K used for NMR calculations, considering the platinum complex and the Val882 residue.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 3429 KiB  
Article
Four-Component Relativistic Calculations of NMR Shielding Constants of the Transition Metal Complexes—Part 3: Fe, Co, Ni, Pd, and Pt Glycinates
by Dmitry O. Samultsev, Valentin A. Semenov and Leonid B. Krivdin
Magnetochemistry 2023, 9(3), 83; https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry9030083 - 16 Mar 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1364
Abstract
The relativistic effects of the values of the shielding constants of 1H, 13C, 15N, 57Fe, 59Co, 61Ni, 105Pd, and 195Pt nuclei were studied at the four-component relativistic level and were compared to the results of [...] Read more.
The relativistic effects of the values of the shielding constants of 1H, 13C, 15N, 57Fe, 59Co, 61Ni, 105Pd, and 195Pt nuclei were studied at the four-component relativistic level and were compared to the results of non-relativistic calculations perfomed on a series of biologically important Fe(II), Co(III), Ni, Pd, and Pt glycinates. The accuracy factors affecting the calculation of the chemical shifts of the title heavy nuclei were analyzed. First of all, the advantages and limitations of the different levels of theory used to take into account the electron correlation effects (namely HF, DFT, MP2, and CCSD) at the geometry optimization stage were thoroughly scrutinized. Among the employed DFT functionals, the behavior of 11 dedicated functionals of different types and hierarchies were analyzed. The contribution of the exact-exchange admixture was established both in the geometrical search and during the calculation of the shielding constants, which was exemplified with the PBE family of functionals. The main result of the performed study was that relativistic effects were of major importance to the theoretical calculations of the shielding constants and chemical shifts of the chelate complexes of the transition metals of the 8–10 groups. Thus, the relativistic effects of the values of the shielding constants of those metals, as well as those of the light nuclei located in the α-position to the latter, were found to reach as much as 35 ppm for nitrogen and up to an enormous 4300 ppm for platinum. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Coordination Compounds)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Equilibrium geometries of iron(II) (<b>1</b>), cobalt(III) (<b>2</b>,<b>3</b>), nickel (<b>4</b>), palladium (<b>5</b>), and platinum (<b>6</b>) glycinates, optimized at the CCSD/TZP level. Bond lengths are given in angstroms, while bond angles are in degrees.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Superimposed structures of glycinates <b>1</b>–<b>6</b> related to their geometries optimized at the HF, DFT(PBE0), MP2, and CCSD levels, as compared to the X-ray data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>M-N bond lengths (Å) of <b>1</b>–<b>6</b>, optimized at the HF, DFT(PBE0), MP2, and CCSD levels, as compared to their X-ray geometries. Dotted lines denote the CCSD values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Normalized Mean Absolute Deviations (%) of salient geometric parameters of <b>1</b>–<b>6</b> optimized at the DFT level using different functionals from experimental X-ray geometry (<b>bottom</b>) and that calculated at the CCSD level (<b>top</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The M-N bond length (Å) of glycinates <b>1</b>, <b>4</b>–<b>6</b> calculated at the PBE<span class="html-italic">x</span>/ATZP level as a function of the amount of the exact-exchange admixture as compared to the CCSD equilibrium geometries.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Normalized Absolute Difference (%) of salient geometric parameters of glycinates <b>1</b>–<b>6</b> evaluated at the non-relativistic (PBE0/ATZP) and relativistic (2cPBE0-DKH/ATZP) levels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Relative relativistic corrections (%) to the <sup>1</sup>H, <sup>13</sup>C, and <sup>15</sup>N shielding constants of <b>1</b>–<b>6</b>, evaluated at the 4cPBE0/pc-1//aug-pcS-2 level. Relativistic corrections are evaluated as percentages of the shielding constants values of the corresponding nuclei calculated at the non-relativistic level using the equation Δ<sub>rel</sub> (%) = (<span class="html-italic">σ</span><sub>rel</sub> − <span class="html-italic">σ</span><sub>non-rel</sub>)/<span class="html-italic">σ</span><sub>non-rel</sub> × 100%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Relativistic corrections (ppm) to the <sup>57</sup>Fe, <sup>59</sup>Co, <sup>61</sup>Ni, <sup>105</sup>Pd, and <sup>195</sup>Pt shielding constants of <b>1</b>–<b>6</b>, evaluated at the 4cPBE0/dyall.ae3z level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The <sup>1</sup>H, <sup>13</sup>C, <sup>15</sup>N, <sup>61</sup>Ni, <sup>105</sup>Pd, and <sup>195</sup>Pt NMR shielding constants of <b>4</b>–<b>6</b> calculated at the PBE<span class="html-italic">x</span>//pc-1//aug-pcS-2//dyall.ae3z level with various amounts of the exact-exchange admixture.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The <sup>15</sup>N NMR shielding constants (ppm) of glycinates <b>1</b>, <b>4</b>–<b>6</b>, calculated at the PBE38/(aug-)pcS-<span class="html-italic">n</span> level using different Jensen’s basis sets on the nitrogen atom.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop