<p>The studied trout cage farms located in Lake Ladoga, Russia; cag—cage sites; ref—reference sites.</p> Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Photos of the bottom around the cage (cag) and reference (ref) sites of the studied trout farms.</p> Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The sediment cores and material from the sediment traps collected at the cage (cag) and reference (ref) sites of the studied farms: a—fresh organic layer; b—background gray silt; c—poorly digested feed.</p> Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Organic matter content (mass %) in sediment samples (0–10 cm) from the cage (cag) and reference (ref) sites of the studied trout farms.</p> Full article ">Figure 5
<p>pH and Eh values of the water and sediment at the cage and reference sites at the studied trout farms.</p> Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Proportion (%), abundance (<b>a</b>) and biomass (<b>b</b>) of the main groups of zooplankton in the water column: 1—surface and middle layers; 2—bottom layer.</p> Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Proportion (%), abundance (<b>a</b>), and biomass (<b>b</b>) of the main groups of zooplankton in the water column: 1—surface and middle layers; 2—bottom layer.</p> Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Proportion (%), abundance (<b>a</b>), and biomass (<b>b</b>) of the main groups of zooplankton in the water column: 1—surface and middle layers; 2—bottom layer.</p> Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Distribution of the abundance (<b>A</b>) and biomass (<b>B</b>) of zooplankton across water layers in the studied trout farms.</p> Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Structure of macrozoobenthos (<b>a</b>) and meiobenthos (<b>b</b>) at the cage and reference sites of the studied trout farms.</p> Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Differences in the abundance and biomass of macrozoobenthos at the reference and cage sites across different seasons of the year.</p> Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Changes in the abundance and biomass of meiobenthos at the reference and cage sites across different seasons of the year.</p> Full article ">