[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Previous Issue
Volume 4, December
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 

Solar, Volume 5, Issue 1 (March 2025) – 9 articles

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
20 pages, 2203 KiB  
Article
Optimizing Solar-Integrated Microgrid Design for Sustainable Rural Electrification: Insights from the LEOPARD Project
by Ahmed Rachid, Talha Batuhan Korkut, Jean-Sebastien Cardot, Cheikh M. F. Kébé, Ababacar Ndiaye, Léonide Michael Sinsin and François Xavier Fifatin
Solar 2025, 5(1), 9; https://doi.org/10.3390/solar5010009 - 7 Mar 2025
Viewed by 118
Abstract
This paper presents findings from the LEOPARD project, part of the LEAP-RE program, a joint European Union (EU) and African Union initiative to advance renewable energy solutions. The study employs a simulation-based approach to optimize solar-integrated microgrid configurations for rural electrification. The project [...] Read more.
This paper presents findings from the LEOPARD project, part of the LEAP-RE program, a joint European Union (EU) and African Union initiative to advance renewable energy solutions. The study employs a simulation-based approach to optimize solar-integrated microgrid configurations for rural electrification. The project deployed a solar-integrated pilot microgrid at the Songhai agroecological center in Benin to address key challenges, including load profile estimation, energy balancing, and diesel dependency reduction. A hybrid methodology integrating predictive modeling, real-time solar and weather data analysis, and performance simulations was employed, leading to a 65% reduction in diesel reliance and an LCOE of EUR 0.47/kWh. Quality control measures, including compliance with IEC 61215 and IEC 62485-2 standards, ensured system reliability under extreme conditions. Over 150 days, the system consistently supplied energy, preventing 10.16 tons of CO2 emissions. Beyond the Benin pilot, the project conducted feasibility assessments in Senegal to evaluate microgrid replicability across different socio-economic and environmental conditions. These analyses highlight the scalability potential and the economic viability of expanding solar microgrids in rural areas. Additionally, this research explores innovative business models and real-time diagnostics to enhance microgrid sustainability. By providing a replicable framework, it promotes long-term energy access and regional adaptability. With a focus on community involvement and capacity building, this study supports efforts to reduce energy poverty, strengthen European–African collaboration, and advance the global clean energy agenda. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Monthly solar irradiation estimates for the Songhai Center, Benin (2013–2024), sourced from PVGIS [<a href="#B18-solar-05-00009" class="html-bibr">18</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The structured workflow of the MEMOGRID tool, illustrating the step-by-step process of microgrid optimization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Working principle of the LENI tool.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Workflow integrating GIS-based analysis (LENI), microgrid optimization (MEMOGRID), and economic assessment (LCOE) for identifying and designing replicable microgrid sites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Settlement layout showcasing PV areas and container placement.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Energy flow diagram illustrating PV, battery, and diesel integration for load balancing.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Geographical replicability analysis for Senegal and Benin using the LENI tool.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>LCOE variations based on population size and grid length in Benin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>LCOE variations based on population size and grid length in Senegal.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Replicability analysis for Senegal and Benin under varying CAPEX subsidy scenarios.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 7161 KiB  
Article
Power Generation Time Series for Solar Energy Generation: Modelling with ATlite in South Africa
by Nicolene Botha, Toshka Coleman, Gert Wessels, Maximilian Kleebauer and Stefan Karamanski
Solar 2025, 5(1), 8; https://doi.org/10.3390/solar5010008 - 7 Mar 2025
Viewed by 275
Abstract
The global energy landscape is experiencing growing challenges, with energy crises in regions such as South Africa underscoring the drive to accelerate the shift toward renewable energy solutions. This paper presents an approach for improving solar energy planning, specifically focusing on leveraging the [...] Read more.
The global energy landscape is experiencing growing challenges, with energy crises in regions such as South Africa underscoring the drive to accelerate the shift toward renewable energy solutions. This paper presents an approach for improving solar energy planning, specifically focusing on leveraging the capabilities of the ATlite software in conjunction with custom data. Using mathematical models, ATlite (which was initially developed by the Renewable Energy Group at the Frankfurt Institute for Advances Studies) is a Python software package that converts historical weather data into power generation potentials and time series for renewable energy technologies such as solar photovoltaic (PV) panels and wind turbines. The software efficiently combines atmospheric and terrain data from large regions using user-defined weights based on land use or energy yield. In this study, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts reanalysis data (ERA5) data was modified using Kriging to enhance the resolution of each data field. This refined data was applied in ATlite, instead of utilizing the standard built-in data download and processing tools, to generate solar capacity factor maps and solar generation time series. This was utilized to identify specific PV technologies as well as optimal sites for solar power. Thereafter, a simulated power generation time series was compared with measured solar generation data, resulting in a root mean square error (RMSE) of 19.6 kW for a 250 kWp installation. This approach’s flexibility and versatility in the inclusion of custom data, led to the conclusion that it could be a suitable option for renewable energy planning and decision making in South Africa and globally, providing value to solar installers and planners. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Procedure overview, with Steps 3–5 discussed more in-depth.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Study area with on the left side original ERA5 resolution at 25 km and on the right side new resolution at 1 km, for the z variable.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>ERA5 and ATlite variables relationship mapping.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Efficiency curve of Trina TSM-PE06H 285 Wp as a function of irradiance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Average solar capacity factors for the study area with orthographic projection for date range 1 March 2020 to 31 March 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Solar power generation time series measured at the installation site (blue) and simulated using ATlite (orange).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>This is a comparison of the solar power generation simulation at the actual installation site (depicted in orange) as shown in <a href="#solar-05-00008-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>, alongside a simulation of the same installation at a location with the highest capacity factor (represented in green) within the study area, as illustrated in <a href="#solar-05-00008-f005" class="html-fig">Figure 5</a>.</p>
Full article ">
29 pages, 3867 KiB  
Review
Enhanced Solar Photovoltaic System Management and Integration: The Digital Twin Concept
by Olufemi Olayiwola, Umit Cali, Miles Elsden and Poonam Yadav
Solar 2025, 5(1), 7; https://doi.org/10.3390/solar5010007 - 6 Mar 2025
Viewed by 396
Abstract
The rapid acceptance of solar photovoltaic (PV) energy across various countries has created a pressing need for more coordinated approaches to the sustainable monitoring and maintenance of these widely distributed installations. To address this challenge, several digitization architectures have been proposed, with one [...] Read more.
The rapid acceptance of solar photovoltaic (PV) energy across various countries has created a pressing need for more coordinated approaches to the sustainable monitoring and maintenance of these widely distributed installations. To address this challenge, several digitization architectures have been proposed, with one of the most recently applied being the digital twin (DT) system architecture. DTs have proven effective in predictive maintenance, rapid prototyping, efficient manufacturing, and reliable system monitoring. However, while the DT concept is well established in fields like wind energy conversion and monitoring, its scope of implementation in PV remains quite limited. Additionally, the recent increased adoption of autonomous platforms, particularly robotics, has expanded the scope of PV management and revealed gaps in real-time monitoring needs. DT platforms can be redesigned to ease such applications and enable integration into the broader energy network. This work provides a system-level overview of current trends, challenges, and future opportunities for DTs within renewable energy systems, focusing on PV systems. It also highlights how advances in artificial intelligence (AI), the internet-of-Things (IoT), and autonomous systems can be leveraged to create a digitally connected energy infrastructure that supports sustainable energy supply and maintenance. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Digital replica developmental levels: (<b>a</b>) digital model, (<b>b</b>) digital shadow, (<b>c</b>) digital twin, and (<b>d</b>) cyber–physical system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Global distribution of (<b>a</b>) published works, (<b>b</b>) publication count, and (<b>c</b>) energy sectors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Visualization of relevant themes within PV DT research: (<b>a</b>) Web of Science database (214 files), and (<b>b</b>) Scopus database (1900 files).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>DTs in PV lifecycle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Functional sub-modules of a PV-DT with robotics integration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Subsystem communication in PV-DT.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>PT-DT communication architecture.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Functional architecture of statistical and AI-based solar power forecasting systems [<a href="#B6-solar-05-00007" class="html-bibr">6</a>].</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 2431 KiB  
Article
Comparative Performance Evaluation of YOLOv5, YOLOv8, and YOLOv11 for Solar Panel Defect Detection
by Rahima Khanam, Tahreem Asghar and Muhammad Hussain
Solar 2025, 5(1), 6; https://doi.org/10.3390/solar5010006 - 21 Feb 2025
Viewed by 492
Abstract
The reliable operation of photovoltaic (PV) systems is essential for sustainable energy production, yet their efficiency is often compromised by defects such as bird droppings, cracks, and dust accumulation. Automated defect detection is critical for addressing these challenges in large-scale solar farms, where [...] Read more.
The reliable operation of photovoltaic (PV) systems is essential for sustainable energy production, yet their efficiency is often compromised by defects such as bird droppings, cracks, and dust accumulation. Automated defect detection is critical for addressing these challenges in large-scale solar farms, where manual inspections are impractical. This study evaluates three YOLO object detection models—YOLOv5, YOLOv8, and YOLOv11—on a comprehensive dataset to identify solar panel defects. YOLOv5 achieved the fastest inference time (7.1 ms per image) and high precision (94.1%) for cracked panels. YOLOv8 excelled in recall for rare defects, such as bird drops (79.2%), while YOLOv11 delivered the highest [email protected] (93.4%), demonstrating a balanced performance across the defect categories. Despite the strong performance for common defects like dusty panels ([email protected] > 98%), bird drop detection posed challenges due to dataset imbalances. These results highlight the trade-offs between accuracy and computational efficiency, providing actionable insights for deploying automated defect detection systems to enhance PV system reliability and scalability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Solar Photovoltaic Protection)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>YOLO model evolution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Representative examples of classes in the solar panel dataset.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Confusion matrix for YOLO models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>F1–confidence curves of YOLO models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Precision–recall (PR) curves of YOLO models.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 12745 KiB  
Article
Characterization of a Densely Packed Photovoltaic Array with RXX Homogenizer in a High-Flux Solar Furnace
by Ernesto Anguera Romero, Nidia Aracely Cisneros-Cárdenas and Claudio A. Estrada Gasca
Solar 2025, 5(1), 5; https://doi.org/10.3390/solar5010005 - 15 Feb 2025
Viewed by 276
Abstract
A theoretical and experimental evaluation was conducted on a prototype radiative flux homogenizer (HOFRAC) specifically designed for the Solar Furnace at Instituto de Energías Renovables (HoSIER) of Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. The development of HOFRAC included three versions (HOFRAC-PRO, HOFRAC-PRI, and HOFRAC-PRIK); [...] Read more.
A theoretical and experimental evaluation was conducted on a prototype radiative flux homogenizer (HOFRAC) specifically designed for the Solar Furnace at Instituto de Energías Renovables (HoSIER) of Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. The development of HOFRAC included three versions (HOFRAC-PRO, HOFRAC-PRI, and HOFRAC-PRIK); each iteration incorporated improvements based on theoretical modeling and experimental results. Evaluations were performed using ray-tracing simulations and experimental tests capturing radiative flux distribution images. The last two versions were used to characterize a densely packed photovoltaic array operated in the solar furnace. Some results of this study show that misaligned mirrors in the furnace were identified as the main problem in achieving a high flux uniformity degree for photovoltaic concentration applications. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) HOFRAC-PR installed at HoSIER, (<b>b</b>) HOFRAC-PR without cover showing the cooling system, and (<b>c</b>) Lambertian target.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flowchart illustrating the evolutionary prototyping process for homogenizers in solar furnaces used.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Inherent obstacles in Solar Furnace Facility. (<b>a</b>) Basic diagram of radiation attenuation in solar furnace and (<b>b</b>) Schematic front view of the 409 hexagonal concentrator mirrors of HoSIER with facility’s obstacles: bridge, platform, experimental table, and central profile.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Radiative flux distribution in the focal plane of HoSIER. (<b>a</b>) Comparison between flux distribution profiles in the HoSIER focal plane in 2015 (optimal) and 2024 profile (current) at 100% attenuator opening; (<b>b</b>) radiative flux distribution in the focal plane at 10% attenuator aperture in 2024.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Radiative flux distribution on the focal plane of HoSIER under the following conditions: (<b>a</b>) with only 12 misaligned concentrator mirrors; (<b>b</b>) with the entire set of concentrator mirrors, including the 12 misaligned ones.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Radiative flux distributions in different homogenizer configurations considering HoSIER obstacles. (<b>a</b>) HOFRAC-PRO with 100% attenuator opening, (<b>b</b>) HOFRAC-PRO with 20% attenuator opening, (<b>c</b>) HOFRAC-PRO with 20% attenuator opening and 12 misaligned mirrors, and (<b>d</b>) HOFRAC-PRO with 20% attenuator opening, 12 misaligned mirrors, and 2 damaged mirrors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Radiative flux distribution in homogenizer configuration for 20% attenuator opening, 12 misaligned mirrors, and 2 damaged mirrors; same configuration for (<b>a</b>) HOFRAC-PRI and (<b>b</b>) HOFRAC-PRIK.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Experimental setup. (<b>a</b>) Schematic diagram of the experimental configuration mounted on HoSIER. Homogenizer and camera configurations by experiment: (<b>b</b>) HOFRAC-PRO, (<b>c</b>) HOFRAC-PRI, and (<b>d</b>) HOFRAC-PRIK.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Photographs of the homogenizers: (<b>a</b>) HOFRAC-PRI, (<b>b</b>) HOFRAC-PRIK, and (<b>c</b>) photovoltaic array coupled to HOFRAC-PRIK.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Uniformity improvement at the exit of the homogenizer. (<b>a</b>) Radiative flux distribution at the HOFRAC-PRI. (<b>b</b>) Radiative flux distribution at the HOFRAC-PRIK.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>(<b>a</b>) Radiative flux distribution at the HOFRAC-PRIK output divided into quadrants and (<b>b</b>) photovoltaic array mounted on a coupling mask.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>I–V curve comparison for HOFRAC-PRI and HOFRAC-PRIK. (<b>a</b>) Quadrant 1, (<b>b</b>) Quadrant 2, (<b>c</b>) Quadrant 3, and (<b>d</b>) Quadrant 4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12 Cont.
<p>I–V curve comparison for HOFRAC-PRI and HOFRAC-PRIK. (<b>a</b>) Quadrant 1, (<b>b</b>) Quadrant 2, (<b>c</b>) Quadrant 3, and (<b>d</b>) Quadrant 4.</p>
Full article ">
31 pages, 4525 KiB  
Review
From Waste to Resource: Exploring the Current Challenges and Future Directions of Photovoltic Solar Cell Recycling
by Ghadeer Badran and Vlado K. Lazarov
Solar 2025, 5(1), 4; https://doi.org/10.3390/solar5010004 - 11 Feb 2025
Viewed by 806
Abstract
The rapid proliferation of photovoltaic (PV) solar cells as a clean energy source has raised significant concerns regarding their end-of-life (EoL) management, particularly in terms of sustainability and waste reduction. This review comprehensively examines challenges, opportunities, and future directions in the recycling of [...] Read more.
The rapid proliferation of photovoltaic (PV) solar cells as a clean energy source has raised significant concerns regarding their end-of-life (EoL) management, particularly in terms of sustainability and waste reduction. This review comprehensively examines challenges, opportunities, and future directions in the recycling of PV solar cells, focusing on mechanical, thermal, and chemical recycling techniques. It also evaluates the scalability and practicality of these methods to different PV technologies, including crystalline silicon and thin-film modules. It explores the economic and environmental impacts of these processes, highlighting the necessity of developing robust recycling infrastructure and innovative technologies to address the anticipated surge in PV waste. Additionally, this review discusses the critical role of government policies and industry collaboration in overcoming the barriers to effective recycling. Furthermore, the importance of integrating design-for-recyclability principles into PV module development is emphasized, as it can significantly enhance material recovery and process efficiency. By advancing these strategies, the solar industry can achieve greater sustainability, reduce resource depletion, and mitigate environmental risks, thereby ensuring the long-term viability of solar energy as a key component of global renewable energy initiatives. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Visual representation of PV solar cell technologies: (<b>a</b>) monocrystalline silicon solar cell (source: <a href="https://korvustech.com/crystalline-vs-thin-film-solar-panels/" target="_blank">https://korvustech.com/crystalline-vs-thin-film-solar-panels/</a>, accessed on 3 December 2024), (<b>b</b>) polycrystalline silicon solar cell (source: <a href="https://korvustech.com/crystalline-vs-thin-film-solar-panels/" target="_blank">https://korvustech.com/crystalline-vs-thin-film-solar-panels/</a>, accessed on 3 December 2024), (<b>c</b>) CdTe thin-film solar cell (source: <a href="https://www.empa.ch/web/s604/solarzellen" target="_blank">https://www.empa.ch/web/s604/solarzellen</a>, accessed on 3 December 2024), (<b>d</b>) perovskite solar cell (source: <a href="https://www.energy.gov/eere/solar/perovskite-solar-cells" target="_blank">https://www.energy.gov/eere/solar/perovskite-solar-cells</a>, accessed on 3 December 2024), (<b>e</b>) OPV solar cell (source: <a href="https://www.toyobo-global.com/news/2020/release_117.html" target="_blank">https://www.toyobo-global.com/news/2020/release_117.html</a>, accessed on 3 December 2024), and (<b>f</b>) quantum dot solar cell (source: <a href="https://www.pv-magazine.com/2021/08/12/ligand-free-perovskite-quantum-dot-solar-cell-with-9-3-efficiency/" target="_blank">https://www.pv-magazine.com/2021/08/12/ligand-free-perovskite-quantum-dot-solar-cell-with-9-3-efficiency/</a>, accessed on 3 December 2024).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic representation of the production process for monocrystalline and multicrystalline silicon solar PV modules. The diagram illustrates the key stages in the production of solar PV panels, from polysilicon material to the processes of ingot growing (for monocrystalline) and melting into brick (for multicrystalline), followed by wafer production, doping, and final assembly into solar PV panels or modules.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The structure of solar modules made from (<b>a</b>) crystalline silicon, (<b>b</b>) thin-film technology. Part of this figure is taken from <a href="https://www.zsw-bw.de/en/research/photovoltaics/topics/thin-film-solar-cells-and-modules.html" target="_blank">https://www.zsw-bw.de/en/research/photovoltaics/topics/thin-film-solar-cells-and-modules.html</a>, accessed on 3 December 2024.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Structural diagrams: (<b>a</b>) perovskites (source: <a href="https://www.sigmaaldrich.cn/CN/zh/technical-documents/technical-article/materials-science-and-engineering/photovoltaics-and-solar-cells/quantum-dot-solar-cells" target="_blank">https://www.sigmaaldrich.cn/CN/zh/technical-documents/technical-article/materials-science-and-engineering/photovoltaics-and-solar-cells/quantum-dot-solar-cells</a>, accessed on 3 December 2024), (<b>b</b>) OPV (source: <a href="https://www.oe.phy.cam.ac.uk/research/photovoltaics/ophotovoltaics" target="_blank">https://www.oe.phy.cam.ac.uk/research/photovoltaics/ophotovoltaics</a>, accessed on 3 December 2024), (<b>c</b>) quantum dot solar cell (source: <a href="https://www.sigmaaldrich.cn/CN/zh/technical-documents/technical-article/materials-science-and-engineering/photovoltaics-and-solar-cells/quantum-dot-solar-cells" target="_blank">https://www.sigmaaldrich.cn/CN/zh/technical-documents/technical-article/materials-science-and-engineering/photovoltaics-and-solar-cells/quantum-dot-solar-cells</a>, accessed on 3 December 2024).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Schematic of the mechanical recycling process for PV solar panels. This Figure illustrates the automated separation of components from both intact and broken-glass PV panels, including junction boxes, aluminum frames, and glass/cell/EVA sheets. These components are subsequently directed to different recycling streams, with recyclable materials being sold to refineries or glass manufacturers for further processing. This process ensures a low environmental impact by efficiently recovering valuable materials from end-of-life solar panels. Figure source: <a href="https://www.npcgroup.net/eng/solarpower/reuse-recycle/dismantling" target="_blank">https://www.npcgroup.net/eng/solarpower/reuse-recycle/dismantling</a>, accessed on 3 December 2024.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Automated mechanical recycling process for PV solar panels. The figure illustrates the step-by-step process of recycling PV solar cells using advanced machinery developed by SUNY Group in China. The process begins with feeding the solar panels into a shredder, followed by the processing of the materials into strips and further grinding them into fine particles. The machinery is equipped with systems for separating copper from other materials and collecting dust, ensuring a low environmental impact and the efficient recovery of valuable resources.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Illustration of the pyrolysis process for recycling PV solar panels. This Figure demonstrates how a pyrolysis plant processes solar panels by decomposing organic components, such as encapsulants and backsheet materials, through heat. The process allows for the recovery of key materials, including aluminium frames, glass, copper wires, and silicon, which are then directed to recycling streams for reuse in manufacturing. Figure source: <a href="https://j4ce.env.go.jp/en/casestudy/153" target="_blank">https://j4ce.env.go.jp/en/casestudy/153</a>, accessed on 3 December 2024.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Environmental challenges in thermal recycling techniques for PV solar cells, including harmful emissions, material degradation, and waste management issues.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Schematic representation of the environmental and economic impacts of leaching in the recycling of PV solar cells, highlighting both the positive outcomes (e.g., waste reduction and resource conservation) and the challenges (e.g., chemical use and potential for environmental contamination).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Flowchart depicting the environmental impact of solvent extraction and electrochemical recovery in solar panel recycling. This Figure outlines the environmental considerations associated with solvent extraction and electrochemical recovery processes. It highlights the trade-offs between solvent toxicity and energy consumption, as well as the benefits of using green solvents and recovering high-purity metals. The recovered materials contribute to sustainable resource use by being reintroduced into the manufacturing cycle, thereby reducing the need for virgin resources and minimizing environmental impacts.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Future recycling framework for PV solar panels integrating inspection, repair, and recycling processes.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 3344 KiB  
Article
Co-Location Potential of Floating PV with Hydropower Plants: Case Study in Ecuador
by Carlos D. Rodríguez-Gallegos, Oktoviano Gandhi, César A. Rodríguez-Gallegos and Manuel S. Alvarez-Alvarado
Solar 2025, 5(1), 3; https://doi.org/10.3390/solar5010003 - 4 Feb 2025
Viewed by 937
Abstract
This study explores the potential for co-locating floating photovoltaics (FPVs) with existing hydropower plants (HPPs) in Ecuador. Ecuador’s heavy reliance on hydropower for electricity generation, combined with recent blackouts caused by prolonged dry seasons, underscores the importance of diversifying energy sources. The integration [...] Read more.
This study explores the potential for co-locating floating photovoltaics (FPVs) with existing hydropower plants (HPPs) in Ecuador. Ecuador’s heavy reliance on hydropower for electricity generation, combined with recent blackouts caused by prolonged dry seasons, underscores the importance of diversifying energy sources. The integration of FPVs with HPPs offers a promising opportunity to enhance energy security by reducing dependency on a single energy source and improving economic, electrical, and environmental outcomes. In this paper, we assess all HPPs in Ecuador and quantify the potential performance of FPV systems when installed at their sites. Our results show that FPV systems can not only contribute additional electricity to the grid but also improve HPP performance by reducing water evaporation from reservoirs and maintaining generation capacity during dry seasons, when solar irradiation is typically higher. To model the energy production, yield, and performance of the FPV systems, we applied RINA’s methodology to estimate representative weather conditions for each site and simulate FPV performance, accounting for system design loss factors. Additionally, we calculated the water savings resulting from FPV installation. Our findings reveal that, out of approximately 70 HPPs in Ecuador, 11 present favorable conditions for large-scale FPV deployment. Among these, Cumbayá HPP (40 MW) exhibited the most suitable conditions, supporting a maximum FPV capacity of 17 MWp. Marcel Laniado de Wind HPP (213 MW) and Mazar HPP (170 MW) were also identified as optimal candidates, each with potential FPV capacities equal to their installed HPP capacities. While this study primarily aims to provide scientific evidence on the potential of FPV-HPP co-location, the results and methodology can also guide Ecuadorian government authorities and investors in adopting FPV technology to strengthen the country’s energy infrastructure. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Histograms based on the hydropower capacities for (<b>a</b>) number of HPP plants, and (<b>b</b>) 2023 annual energy production.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Hydropower plants’ locations in Ecuador. The circle size is linearly increased to represent the hydropower plant installation capacity, where the largest circle shows the 1500 MW capacity from Coca Codo Sinclair. Negative latitude values refer to the Western hemisphere, while positive longitude values refer to the Northern hemisphere.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Graphical representation of the weighted mean calculation used to estimate the representative irradiance for the site of interest, accounting for spatial resolution and dataset duration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Illustration of the typical pure-float FPV system which is considered in this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Installation capacity of FPV and HPP for the selected sites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Normalized results for FPV energy production, performance ratio and yield.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>FPV normalized results related to the water savings based on total amount and height.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The map shows the locations of selected hydropower plants in Ecuador for potential FPV deployment. The size of each circle is proportional to the FPV installation capacity, while the color represents the FPV energy production potential. The names of the selected HPPs are also displayed, with each number corresponding to the FPV ranking based on this study. The color of the text matches the circle color for easy identification. Negative latitude values refer to the Western hemisphere while positive longitude values refer to the Northern hemisphere.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Normal statistical distribution showing the percentile values employed for the uncertainty analysis. Source: <a href="https://eepower.com/" target="_blank">https://eepower.com/</a>.</p>
Full article ">
26 pages, 5496 KiB  
Article
A Tool for a Fast and Accurate Evaluation of the Energy Production of Bifacial Photovoltaic Modules
by Vincenzo d’Alessandro, Santolo Daliento, Mahmoud Dhimish and Pierluigi Guerriero
Solar 2025, 5(1), 2; https://doi.org/10.3390/solar5010002 - 16 Jan 2025
Viewed by 769
Abstract
In this work, we propose a simulation tool designed for the analysis and optimization of bifacial photovoltaic (PV) modules, which are currently under the spotlight in the renewable energy scenario. The tool is conceived to support researchers and engineers by providing fast and [...] Read more.
In this work, we propose a simulation tool designed for the analysis and optimization of bifacial photovoltaic (PV) modules, which are currently under the spotlight in the renewable energy scenario. The tool is conceived to support researchers and engineers by providing fast and accurate predictions of the PV module yield under various operating and environmental conditions. For a chosen geographical site, the impact of module orientation, tilt, albedo, sky conditions, ambient temperature, and so on can be effortlessly determined. In case of nonuniformity across the cells dictated by localized architectural shading, dirt, bird drops, and defects, a circuit-based cell-level approach can be activated to compute the module production. An extensive simulation campaign is performed by assuming that the panels are installed in Naples without loss of generality. Results are shown to give detailed insights into the performance of bifacial modules, thus providing unambiguous guidelines for their correct installation. Further analyses are conducted to demonstrate the tool capability to quantify the detrimental influence of a poorly-irradiated cell on the backside, as well as of cracked cells. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Simplified flowchart of the proposed tool.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Side view of the tilted PV module illustrating some key angles, namely, the solar altitude α, the tilt angles of the front (β) and rear (β<span class="html-italic"><sub>rear</sub></span>) of the module, the incidence angles on the front (θ) and rear (θ<span class="html-italic"><sub>rear</sub></span>); (<b>b</b>) top view showing the projection of the module and of its normal onto the ground, the azimuth angle γ of the front (defining the module orientation), and the azimuth angle of the back γ<span class="html-italic"><sub>rear</sub></span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>1st (solid red line) and 2nd (solid blue) terms on the right-hand side (RHS) of (31), along with the 2nd term on the RHS of (27) (dashed blue) as a function of tilt angle β for <span class="html-italic">G<sub>toth</sub></span> = 700 W/m<sup>2</sup>, <span class="html-italic">G<sub>dh</sub></span> = 200 W/m<sup>2</sup>, <span class="html-italic">albedo</span> = 0.5, <span class="html-italic">d</span> = 0 m, (<b>a</b>) α = 30°, (<b>b</b>) α = 50°.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Beam and (<b>b</b>) diffuse irradiances incident on the backside of a west-oriented (γ = 90°) vertical (β = 90°) bifacial module located in Naples over daytime on July 15, as computed by block #3; (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) also show the horizontal irradiances <span class="html-italic">G<sub>bh</sub></span> and <span class="html-italic">G<sub>dh</sub></span> obtained from the PVGIS website.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Simplified schematic of the subcircuit adopted to model a PV cell in a bifacial module evidencing the ABM parts denoted as <b>A<sub>1</sub></b>, <b>A<sub>2</sub></b>, <b>B</b>, <b>C</b>, <b>D</b>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Side view of the south-oriented (γ = 0°) monofacial module tilted by β = 30°, taken as a reference; (<b>b</b>) side view of a vertical (β = 90°) bifacial module with front facing the west (γ = 90°).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Normalized energy produced in the months of the year for south-oriented (γ = 0°) modules with a tilt angle β = 30° installed in Naples. The monofacial module (cyan lines) is compared with the bifacial counterpart (blue) for various <span class="html-italic">albedo</span> values (rhombi, circles, and squares for <span class="html-italic">albedo</span> = 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8, respectively).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Normalized energy produced in the months of the year for south-oriented (γ = 0°) vertical (β = 90°) modules mounted in Naples. The monofacial panel (light green lines) is compared with the bifacial counterpart (dark green) for various <span class="html-italic">albedo</span> values (rhombi, circles, and squares for <span class="html-italic">albedo</span> = 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8, respectively).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Normalized energy produced in the months of the year for (<b>a</b>) west- (γ = 90°) and (<b>b</b>) east-oriented (γ = −90°) vertical (β = 90°) modules installed in Naples. The monofacial panel (dark yellow lines for γ = 90°, magenta for γ = −90°) is compared with the bifacial counterpart (wine lines for γ = 90°, red for γ = −90°) for various <span class="html-italic">albedo</span> values (rhombi, circles, and squares for <span class="html-italic">albedo</span> = 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8, respectively).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Normalized energy produced in the months of the year for the reference south-oriented (γ = 0°) monofacial panel tilted by β = 30° (cyan line) and various vertical (β = 90°) bifacial panels, namely, with south-oriented (γ = 0°, dark green), west-oriented (γ = 90°, wine), and east-oriented (γ = −90°, red) front, the latter two practically coinciding, all installed in Naples. An <span class="html-italic">albedo</span> = 0.2 was considered for all cases.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Normalized maximum power vs. <span class="html-italic">CKT</span> on (<b>a</b>) July 15 and (<b>b</b>) December 15 for vertical (β = 90°) bifacial modules, with south- (γ = 0°, dark green line), west- (γ = 90°, wine), and east-oriented (γ = −90°, red) front. An <span class="html-italic">albedo</span> = 0.2 was considered for all cases.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Normalized energy produced in the months of the year for the south-oriented (γ = 0°) bifacial module tilted by β = 30° (blue lines) and for the west-oriented (γ = 90°) vertical (β = 90°) one (wine) for various <span class="html-italic">albedo</span> values (rhombi, circles, and squares for <span class="html-italic">albedo</span> = 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8, respectively).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Normalized power vs. voltage for an east-oriented (γ = −90°) vertical (β = 90°) bifacial module installed in Naples on July 15 at (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">CKT</span> = 11:00 AM and (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">CKT</span> = 3:00 PM. The case of uniform irradiance incident on the front and rear (blue curves) is compared with the case in which a mud spot partially covers cell #10 (<a href="#solar-05-00002-f014" class="html-fig">Figure 14</a>) on the rear (red curves). The analysis was performed by assuming <span class="html-italic">albedo</span> = 0.2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Schematic representation of the module rear illustrating the likely case of a mud spot partially covering cell #10.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Normalized power against voltage for a vertical (β = 90°) east-oriented (γ = −90°) bifacial module mounted in Naples on July 15 at <span class="html-italic">CKT</span> = 10:00 AM. The case of all normally-working (defect-free) cells (blue curve) is compared with the case in which one (green), two (dark yellow), and three (red) cells are cracked, a cracked cell being emulated by considering a very low shunt resistance in the subcircuit depicted in <a href="#solar-05-00002-f005" class="html-fig">Figure 5</a>. The analysis was conducted by setting <span class="html-italic">albedo</span> = 0.2.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 4642 KiB  
Article
Investigation of Grid-Tied Photovoltaic Power Plant on Medium-Voltage Feeder: Palestine Polytechnic University Case Study
by Maher Maghalseh, Nassim Iqteit, Haitham Alqadi and Salman Ajib
Solar 2025, 5(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.3390/solar5010001 - 16 Jan 2025
Viewed by 754
Abstract
The conventional unidirectional power flow model of centralized energy grids is being revolutionized by integrating renewable energy sources, particularly photovoltaic (PV) systems, to meet the escalating demand for electricity while ensuring sustainability. However, this integration challenges the efficiency and performance of power systems [...] Read more.
The conventional unidirectional power flow model of centralized energy grids is being revolutionized by integrating renewable energy sources, particularly photovoltaic (PV) systems, to meet the escalating demand for electricity while ensuring sustainability. However, this integration challenges the efficiency and performance of power systems and impacts various parameters, including power quality, voltage profile, power factor, power loss, and load flow. This paper investigates the effects and performance of a grid-tied PV system integrated into the conventional power system, focusing on the Palestine Polytechnic University (PPU) 230 kWp PV plant as a real-world case study. Simulations conducted using ETAP software revealed that integrating the PV system resulted in a slight increase in the voltage level at the main bus of the PPU feeder, with an increase of 0.03% at the medium-voltage level. Additionally, the voltage level at the Point of Common Coupling (PCC) increased by 0.51% with a PV penetration level of only 14.7%, which remains within the acceptable range according to IEEE 1547 standards. These findings underscore the minimal impact of the PV system on the voltage profile and highlight the system’s ability to maintain power quality and efficiency even with the addition of renewable energy sources. The daily load profiles were studied with and without the PV system, providing a comprehensive analysis of its effects on the grid. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The single-line diagram of the 33 kV line of HEPDS [<a href="#B35-solar-05-00001" class="html-bibr">35</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Single-line diagram of the PPU feeder [<a href="#B35-solar-05-00001" class="html-bibr">35</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>PPU feeder daily load profile.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The PPU distribution transformer profile.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>PV system average daily generation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>PPU load and PV system configuration [<a href="#B35-solar-05-00001" class="html-bibr">35</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Voltage drop per hour at the main bus of the PPU feeder.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Main bus apparent power with and without the PV system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Main bus power factor with and without the PV system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>PPU feeder power loss in kW.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The voltage profile with and without PV at the distribution transformer PCC LV side.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>PCC grid-side active power consumption.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>The power factor at PCC on the PPU distribution transformer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Voltage profile for the PPU bus at maximum load and minimum generation of PV.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Voltage profile for the PPU bus at minimum load and maximum generation of PV.</p>
Full article ">
Previous Issue
Back to TopTop