[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Next Issue
Volume 3, October
Previous Issue
Volume 3, August
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
remotesensing-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Remote Sens., Volume 3, Issue 9 (September 2011) – 16 articles , Pages 1805-2109

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Section
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
2659 KiB  
Article
The Utilization of Historical Data and Geospatial Technology Advances at the Jornada Experimental Range to Support Western America Ranching Culture
by Albert Rango, Kris Havstad and Rick Estell
Remote Sens. 2011, 3(9), 2089-2109; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs3092089 - 20 Sep 2011
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 8365
Abstract
By the early 1900s, concerns were expressed by ranchers, academicians, and federal scientists that widespread overgrazing and invasion of native grassland by woody shrubs were having severe negative impacts upon normal grazing practices in Western America. Ranchers wanted to reverse these trends and [...] Read more.
By the early 1900s, concerns were expressed by ranchers, academicians, and federal scientists that widespread overgrazing and invasion of native grassland by woody shrubs were having severe negative impacts upon normal grazing practices in Western America. Ranchers wanted to reverse these trends and continue their way of life and were willing to work with scientists to achieve these goals. One response to this desire was establishment of the USDA Jornada Experimental Range (783 km2) in south central New Mexico by a Presidential Executive Order in 1912 for conducting rangeland investigations. This cooperative effort involved experiments to understand principles of proper management and the processes causing the woody shrub invasion as well as to identify treatments to eradicate shrubs. By the late 1940s, it was apparent that combining the historical ground-based data accumulated at Jornada Experimental Range with rapidly expanding post World War II technologies would yield a better understanding of the driving processes in these arid and semiarid ecosystems which could then lead to improved rangeland management practices. One specific technology was the use of aerial photography to interpret landscape resource conditions. The assembly and utilization of long-term historical aerial photography data sets has occurred over the last half century. More recently, Global Positioning System (GPS) techniques have been used in a myriad of scientific endeavors including efforts to accurately locate historical and contemporary treatment plots and to track research animals including livestock and wildlife. As an incredible amount of both spatial and temporal data became available, Geographic Information Systems have been exploited to display various layers of data over the same locations. Subsequent analyses of these data layers have begun to yield new insights. The most recent technological development has been the deployment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) that afford the opportunity to obtain high (5 cm) resolution data now required for rangeland monitoring. The Jornada team is now a leader in civil UAV applications in the USA. The scientific advances at the Jornada in fields such as remote sensing can be traced to the original Western America ranching culture that established the Jornada in 1912 and which persists as an important influence in shaping research directions today. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing in Natural and Cultural Heritage)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Fencing crew on the Jornada Range Reserve in October 1912 on a lunch break while installing boundary fences as established by the US Congress and signed into law by President William Taft on 4 May 1912.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Field work in the summer of 1930 with Mr. Canfield on the Jornada Experimental Range.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>J.T. Cassady and J.G. Keller charting vegetation Quadrat S-6 looking down Ropes Draw on 27 November 1933.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Roundup of cattle herd from pasture 10 at the Jornada Experimental Range taken in October 1939.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Presentation of the latest grazing research results during Ranch Day on 14 October 1940 at the Jornada Experimental Range.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Big Meadows stock tank being built by Civilian Conservation Corps at the Jornada Experimental Range on 3 April 1934 using three-horse Fresno teams.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Civilian Conservation Corps crew from Jornada Camp F-39-N digging trench for a root bisect and general soil-plant ecological study at Jornada on 21 April 1936.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Broad-scale shift in dominant vegetation over 150 years at the Jornada Experimental Range.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Rephotography of a tarbush grubbing site at the Jornada Experimental Range. The top photo was taken on 22 April 1937, and the bottom photo was taken at the same location on 25 June 2002.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Shrub cover increase from 1937 to 2003 based on results from an object-based classification of the images on level 1 of the image object hierarchy using aerial photography and some high resolution satellite data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Five aerial photographs of Ace Tank from 1975 to 2006 showing progressive vegetation growth behind shallow water ponding dikes at the Jornada, an effective form of water harvesting in arid and semiarid regions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>2010 launch of the Bat-3 UAV at Jornada.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Time sequence of the Jornada Bat-3 landing at the Reynolds Creek Experimental Watershed in Idaho during 2008.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>The Jornada flight team responsible for UAV rangeland applications.</p>
Full article ">
1530 KiB  
Article
Improved Feature Detection in Fused Intensity-Range Images with Complex SIFT (?SIFT)
by Patrick Erik Bradley and Boris Jutzi
Remote Sens. 2011, 3(9), 2076-2088; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs3092076 - 16 Sep 2011
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 7502
Abstract
The real and imaginary parts are proposed as an alternative to the usual Polar representation of complex-valued images. It is proven that the transformation from Polar to Cartesian representation contributes to decreased mutual information, and hence to greater distinctiveness. The Complex Scale-Invariant Feature [...] Read more.
The real and imaginary parts are proposed as an alternative to the usual Polar representation of complex-valued images. It is proven that the transformation from Polar to Cartesian representation contributes to decreased mutual information, and hence to greater distinctiveness. The Complex Scale-Invariant Feature Transform (?SIFT) detects distinctive features in complex-valued images. An evaluation method for estimating the uniformity of feature distributions in complex-valued images derived from intensity-range images is proposed. In order to experimentally evaluate the proposed methodology on intensity-range images, three different kinds of active sensing systems were used: Range Imaging, Laser Scanning, and Structured Light Projection devices (PMD CamCube 2.0, Z+F IMAGER 5003, Microsoft Kinect). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Terrestrial Laser Scanning)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>RIM. <math display="inline"> <msub> <mi>I</mi> <mi>p</mi> </msub> </math>, <math display="inline"> <msub> <mi>I</mi> <mi>a</mi> </msub> </math>, <span class="html-italic">φ</span> (from left to right).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>TLS. Left: <math display="inline"> <msub> <mi>I</mi> <mi>raw</mi> </msub> </math>, Right: <span class="html-italic">φ</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>SLP. Left: <math display="inline"> <msub> <mi>I</mi> <mi>p</mi> </msub> </math>, right: <span class="html-italic">φ</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Homologous matched feature points in SLP image: <math display="inline"> <msub> <mi>S</mi> <mi>raw</mi> </msub> </math>, <math display="inline"> <msub> <mi>S</mi> <mi>Polar</mi> </msub> </math>, <math display="inline"> <msub> <mi>S</mi> <mi>Cartesian</mi> </msub> </math> (from left to right).</p>
Full article ">
670 KiB  
Article
Consequences of Uncertainty in Global-Scale Land Cover Maps for Mapping Ecosystem Functions: An Analysis of Pollination Efficiency
by Catharina J.E. Schulp and Rob Alkemade
Remote Sens. 2011, 3(9), 2057-2075; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs3092057 - 16 Sep 2011
Cited by 46 | Viewed by 10308
Abstract
Mapping ecosystem services (ESs) is an important tool for providing the quantitative information necessary for the optimal use and protection of ecosystems and biodiversity. A common mapping approach is to apply established empirical relationships to ecosystem property maps. Often, ecosystem properties that provide [...] Read more.
Mapping ecosystem services (ESs) is an important tool for providing the quantitative information necessary for the optimal use and protection of ecosystems and biodiversity. A common mapping approach is to apply established empirical relationships to ecosystem property maps. Often, ecosystem properties that provide services to humanity are strongly related to the land use and land cover, where the spatial allocation of the land cover in the landscape is especially important. Land use and land cover maps are, therefore, essential for ES mapping. However, insight into the uncertainties in land cover maps and how these propagate into ES maps is lacking. To analyze the effects of these uncertainties, we mapped pollination efficiency as an example of an ecosystem function, using two continental-scale land cover maps and two global-scale land cover maps. We compared the outputs with maps based on a detailed national-scale map. The ecosystem properties and functions could be mapped using the GLOBCOVER map with a reasonable to good accuracy. In homogeneous landscapes, an even coarser resolution map would suffice. For mapping ESs that depend on the spatial allocation of land cover in the landscape, a classification of satellite images using fractional land cover or mosaic classes is an asset. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing on Earth Observation and Ecosystem Services)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Flowchart of the analyses; and (<b>b</b>) Procedure for aggregating the 25-m resolution Land Use Map of the Netherlands (LGN).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Landscape characteristics of the Netherlands.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Distance to nature in agricultural areas. (<b>Top left</b>) Base map; (<b>Top</b>) Maps based on aggregated LGN; (<b>Bottom</b>) Maps based on real land cover.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Number of maps that show a high similarity to the basemap. (<b>a</b>) D<sub>nature</sub>, aggregated LGN maps; (<b>b</b>) D<sub>nature</sub>, real maps; (<b>c</b>) Yield reduction fraction, aggregated LGN maps; (<b>d</b>) Yield reduction fraction, real maps.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Yield reduction fractions. (<b>Top left</b>) Base map; (<b>Top</b>) Maps based on aggregated LGN; (<b>Bottom</b>) Maps based on real land cover.</p>
Full article ">
314 KiB  
Commentary
Issues in Establishing Climate Sensitivity in Recent Studies
by Kevin E. Trenberth, John T. Fasullo and John P. Abraham
Remote Sens. 2011, 3(9), 2051-2056; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs3092051 - 16 Sep 2011
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 13752
Abstract
Numerous attempts have been made to constrain climate sensitivity with observations [1-10] (with [6] as LC09, [8] as SB11). While all of these attempts contain various caveats and sources of uncertainty, some efforts have been shown to contain major errors and are demonstrably [...] Read more.
Numerous attempts have been made to constrain climate sensitivity with observations [1-10] (with [6] as LC09, [8] as SB11). While all of these attempts contain various caveats and sources of uncertainty, some efforts have been shown to contain major errors and are demonstrably incorrect. For example, multiple studies [11-13] separately addressed weaknesses in LC09 [6]. The work of Trenberth et al. [13], for instance, demonstrated a basic lack of robustness in the LC09 method that fundamentally undermined their results. Minor changes in that study’s subjective assumptions yielded major changes in its main conclusions. Moreover, Trenberth et al. [13] criticized the interpretation of El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) as an analogue for exploring the forced response of the climate system. In addition, as many cloud variations on monthly time scales result from internal atmospheric variability, such as the Madden-Julian Oscillation, cloud variability is not a deterministic response to surface temperatures. Nevertheless, many of the problems in LC09 [6] have been perpetuated, and Dessler [10] has pointed out similar issues with two more recent such attempts [7,8]. Here we briefly summarize more generally some of the pitfalls and issues involved in developing observational constraints on climate feedbacks. [...] Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Slope of regression coefficients between monthly temperature anomalies and climate models using (upper) a model which does not accurately reproduce ENSO, (middle) a model which reproduces ENSO reasonably well, and (bottom) all CMIP3 models. Black lines are from observations, red lines are results averaged by decade, and red dashed lines indicate the range of model results.</p>
Full article ">
2070 KiB  
Article
Impacts of Coastal Inundation Due to Climate Change in a CLUSTER of Urban Coastal Communities in Ghana, West Africa
by Kwasi Appeaning Addo, Lloyd Larbi, Barnabas Amisigo and Patrick Kwabena Ofori-Danson
Remote Sens. 2011, 3(9), 2029-2050; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs3092029 - 7 Sep 2011
Cited by 74 | Viewed by 14690
Abstract
The increasing rates of sea level rise caused by global warming within the 21st century are expected to exacerbate inundation and episodic flooding tide in low-lying coastal environments. This development threatens both human development and natural habitats within such coastal communities. The impact [...] Read more.
The increasing rates of sea level rise caused by global warming within the 21st century are expected to exacerbate inundation and episodic flooding tide in low-lying coastal environments. This development threatens both human development and natural habitats within such coastal communities. The impact of sea level rise will be more pronounced in developing countries where there is limited adaptation capacity. This paper presents a comprehensive assessment of the expected impacts of sea level rise in three communities in the Dansoman coastal area of Accra, Ghana. Future sea level rises were projected based on global scenarios and the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization General Circulation Models—CSIRO_MK2_GS GCM. These were used in the SimCLIM model based on the modified Bruun rule and the simulated results overlaid on near vertical aerial photographs taken in 2005. It emerged that the Dansoman coastline could recede by about 202 m by the year 2100 with baseline from 1970 to 1990. The potential impacts on the socioeconomic and natural systems of the Dansoman coastal area were characterized at the Panbros, Grefi and Gbegbeyise communities. The study revealed that about 84% of the local dwellers is aware of the rising sea level in the coastal area but have poor measures of adapting to the effects of flood disasters. Analysis of the likely impacts of coastal inundation revealed that about 650,000 people, 926 buildings and a total area of about 0.80 km2 of land are vulnerable to permanent inundation by the year 2100. The study has shown that there will be significant losses to both life and property by the year 2100 in the Dansoman coastal community in the event of sea level rise. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing in Coastal Ecosystem)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The study area (source [<a href="#B39-remotesensing-03-02029" class="html-bibr">39</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Sea Level Rise Projections based on CSIRO_MK2_GS A1F1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Sea Level Rise Projections based on the B2 emission scenarios.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Areas susceptible to permanent inundation in the Grefi and Gbegbeyise communities.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Settlement (red) and vegetated area (green) susceptible to permanent inundation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Causes of inundation in the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Adaptation measures to mitigate sea level rise.</p>
Full article ">
580 KiB  
Article
Modeling Relationships among 217 Fires Using Remote Sensing of Burn Severity in Southern Pine Forests
by Sparkle L. Malone, Leda N. Kobziar, Christina L. Staudhammer and Amr Abd-Elrahman
Remote Sens. 2011, 3(9), 2005-2028; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs3092005 - 7 Sep 2011
Cited by 25 | Viewed by 8923
Abstract
Pine flatwoods forests in the southeastern US have experienced severe wildfires over the past few decades, often attributed to fuel load build-up. These forest communities are fire dependent and require regular burning for ecosystem maintenance and health. Although prescribed fire has been used [...] Read more.
Pine flatwoods forests in the southeastern US have experienced severe wildfires over the past few decades, often attributed to fuel load build-up. These forest communities are fire dependent and require regular burning for ecosystem maintenance and health. Although prescribed fire has been used to reduce wildfire risk and maintain ecosystem integrity, managers are still working to reintroduce fire to long unburned areas. Common perception holds that reintroduction of fire in long unburned forests will produce severe fire effects, resulting in a reluctance to prescribe fire without first using expensive mechanical fuels reduction techniques. To inform prioritization and timing of future fire use, we apply remote sensing analysis to examine the set of conditions most likely to result in high burn severity effects, in relation to vegetation, years since the previous fire, and historical fire frequency. We analyze Landsat imagery-based differenced Normalized Burn Ratios (dNBR) to model the relationships between previous and future burn severity to better predict areas of potential high severity. Our results show that remote sensing techniques are useful for modeling the relationship between elevated risk of high burn severity and the amount of time between fires, the type of fire (wildfire or prescribed burn), and the historical frequency of fires in pine flatwoods forests. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Remote Sensing of Wildland Fires)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the Osceola National Forest and dominant overstory vegetation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The relationship between time since last fire and: (<b>a</b>) the probability of high burn severity; (<b>b</b>) the probability of increasing burn severity; (<b>c</b>) the probability of decreasing burn severity; and (<b>d</b>) the probability of fire occurrence in subsequent fire by fire type.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Relationship between time since last fire, frequency of fire, and the probability of high burn severity for: (<b>a</b>) prescribed burns; and (<b>b</b>) wildfire.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The observed burn severity levels for (<b>a</b>) the actual area burned during the 2007 fires in the Osceola National Forest, FL <span class="html-italic">versus</span> (<b>b</b>) Model derived probability of high burn severity for prescribed burns and wildfires.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Model derived probability of high burn severity for (<b>a</b>) prescribed burns; (<b>b</b>) wildfires; and (<b>c</b>) time since last fire across the entire Osceola National Forest, FL.</p>
Full article ">
93 KiB  
Editorial
Taking Responsibility on Publishing the Controversial Paper “On the Misdiagnosis of Surface Temperature Feedbacks from Variations in Earth’s Radiant Energy Balance” by Spencer and Braswell, Remote Sens. 2011, 3(8), 1603-1613
by Wolfgang Wagner
Remote Sens. 2011, 3(9), 2002-2004; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs3092002 - 2 Sep 2011
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 33750
Abstract
Peer-reviewed journals are a pillar of modern science. Their aim is to achieve highest scientific standards by carrying out a rigorous peer review that is, as a minimum requirement, supposed to be able to identify fundamental methodological errors or false claims. Unfortunately, as [...] Read more.
Peer-reviewed journals are a pillar of modern science. Their aim is to achieve highest scientific standards by carrying out a rigorous peer review that is, as a minimum requirement, supposed to be able to identify fundamental methodological errors or false claims. Unfortunately, as many climate researchers and engaged observers of the climate change debate pointed out in various internet discussion fora, the paper by Spencer and Braswell [1] that was recently published in Remote Sensing is most likely problematic in both aspects and should therefore not have been published. After having become aware of the situation, and studying the various pro and contra arguments, I agree with the critics of the paper. Therefore, I would like to take the responsibility for this editorial decision and, as a result, step down as Editor-in-Chief of the journal Remote Sensing. [...] Full article
1652 KiB  
Article
Demonstration of Two Portable Scanning LiDAR Systems Flown at Low-Altitude for Investigating Coastal Sea Surface Topography
by Julian Vrbancich, Wolfgang Lieff and Jorg Hacker
Remote Sens. 2011, 3(9), 1983-2001; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs3091983 - 2 Sep 2011
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 7969
Abstract
We demonstrate the efficacy of a commercial portable 2D laser scanner (operating at a wavelength close to 1,000 nm) deployed from a fixed-wing aircraft for measuring the sea surface topography and wave profiles over coastal waters. The LiDAR instrumentation enabled simultaneous measurements of [...] Read more.
We demonstrate the efficacy of a commercial portable 2D laser scanner (operating at a wavelength close to 1,000 nm) deployed from a fixed-wing aircraft for measuring the sea surface topography and wave profiles over coastal waters. The LiDAR instrumentation enabled simultaneous measurements of the 2D laser scanner with two independent inertial navigation units, and also simultaneous measurements with a more advanced 2D laser scanner (operating at a wavelength near 1,500 nm). The latter scanner is used routinely for accurately measuring terrestrial topography and was used as a benchmark in this study. We present examples of sea surface topography and wave profiles based on low altitude surveys (< ~300 m) over coastal waters in the vicinity of Cape de Couedic, Kangaroo Island, South Australia and over the surf zone adjacent to the mouth of the Murray River, South Australia. Relative wave heights in the former survey are shown to be consistent with relative wave heights observed from a waverider buoy located near Cape de Couedic during the LiDAR survey. The sea surface topography of waves in the surf zone was successfully mapped with both laser scanners resolving relative wave height variations and fine structure of the sea surface to within approximately 10 cm. A topographic map of the sea surface referenced to the airborne sensor frame transforms to an accurate altimetry map which may be used with airborne electromagnetic instrumentation to provide an averaged altimetry covering a portion of the larger electromagnetic footprint. This averaged altimetry is deemed to be significantly more reliable as a measurement of altimetry than spot measurements using a nadir-looking laser altimeter and would therefore improve upon the use of airborne electromagnetic methods for bathymetric mapping in surf-zone waters. The aperture range of the scanner does not necessarily determine the swath. We observed that instead, the maximum swath at a given altitude was limited by the angle of incidence of the laser at the water surface. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of survey areas on Australia’s coastline. Inset: A, Cape de Couedic located on south-west tip of Kangaroo Island (see first figure in <a href="#sec3dot3-remotesensing-03-01983" class="html-sec">Section 3.3</a> for detail); B, mouth of Murray River area (see first Figure in <a href="#sec3dot1-remotesensing-03-01983" class="html-sec">Section 3.1</a> for detail).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Experimental set-up on port and starboard wing pods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Instrumentation configuration: (<b>a</b>) Port pod assembly: (A), Q560 scanner; (B), RT3003 GPS-IMU; (C), data logger; and (<b>b</b>) Starboard pod assembly: (A), Q240 scanner; (B), HG1700 AG58 IMU; (C), NovAtel OEM4 GPS; (D), RT3003 GPS-IMU; (E), data logger; (F), LD90 altimeter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Surf zone, Mouth of the Murray River during the LiDAR survey (10 May 2007). The mouth of the Murray River is located at “X”, the Coorong Channel is located at “Y”.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Mouth of Murray River and Coorong area, South Australia. Flight Sections 1–3: Q240; Sections 4 and 5: Q560 (see text). 2,000 m grid spacing (WGS84, SUTM53).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Three contiguous sections of sea surface topography (Q240-OEM4-HG1700 AG58 IMU data) in the surf zone. Color scale refers to height (m) above ellipsoid and applies to all three images. Top (linear extent ~1,580 m, width ~105 m), middle (linear extent ~1,825 m, width ~150 m) and bottom (linear extent ~1,835 m, width ~155 m) tiles refer to polygons 1, 2, and 3 in <a href="#remotesensing-03-01983-f005" class="html-fig">Figure 5</a> respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Sea surface profiles (height (m) above ellipsoid) in surf zone, mouth of Murray River. Left: Line 4 (<a href="#remotesensing-03-01983-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>, middle); Right: Line 2 (<a href="#remotesensing-03-01983-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>, top). Blue: Q240-OEM4-HG1700 AG58 IMU; green: Q240-RT3003; red: Q240-RT3003 with GPS precise point positioning post-processing.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Two contiguous sections of sea surface topography (Q560-RT3003 data) in the surf zone. Color scale refers to height (m) above ellipsoid and applies to both images. Images top (linear extent ~1,135 m, width ~165 m) and bottom (linear extent ~1,360 m, width ~155 m) refer to polygons 4 and 5 (<a href="#remotesensing-03-01983-f005" class="html-fig">Figure 5</a>) respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Sea surface profiles (height (m) above ellipsoid) in surf zone, mouth of Murray River. Left panel: Line 11 (<a href="#remotesensing-03-01983-f008" class="html-fig">Figure 8</a>, top); right panel: Line 17 (<a href="#remotesensing-03-01983-f008" class="html-fig">Figure 8</a>, bottom). Green: Q560-RT3003; red: Q240-OEM4-HG1700 AG58 IMU. Note the different scales and relative displacements on the vertical axes. The difference in absolute height is caused by different estimates of GPS height in the single point GPS positioning obtained from the two different GPS receivers.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Altimetry map—Height of Q240 LiDAR above the sea surface (see <a href="#remotesensing-03-01983-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a> (top panel) for equivalent sea surface topography map); (linear extent ~1,580 m, width ~105 m): covering polygon 1, <a href="#remotesensing-03-01983-f005" class="html-fig">Figure 5</a>. The color scale bar shows the altitude in meters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Cape de Couedic, Kangaroo Island, South Australia. Flight Sections A, B, C (see text). The square symbol shows the location of the waverider buoy. 4,000 m grid spacing (WGS84, SUTM53).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Cape de Couedic waverider buoy time series: relative wave height over a 10 min sample.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Section of sea surface topography (Flight Section A, <a href="#remotesensing-03-01983-f011" class="html-fig">Figure 11</a>), Cape de Couedic, in vicinity of waverider buoy (646,000 mE, 6,007,000 mN, WGS84, SUTM53) located approximately 750 m due south of the south-west edge of the topographic grid. Q240-NovAtel OEM4-Honeywell HG1700 AG58 IMU data. Grid spacing: 500 m. Color scale bar: meters relative to WGS84 ellipsoid. Mean altimetry: 475 m (±17 m standard deviation). Swath: ~ 160–200 m.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Profile of sea surface (relative to WGS84 ellipsoid) along track located approximately midway along the topographic grid shown in <a href="#remotesensing-03-01983-f013" class="html-fig">Figure 13</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Section of sea surface topography, Weirs Cove (Flight Section B, <a href="#remotesensing-03-01983-f011" class="html-fig">Figure 11</a>), between Kirkpatrick Point (Remarkable Rocks) to the east (50 m above sea level), and a headland adjacent to Cape de Couedic to the west (80 m above sea level). Q240 – NovAtel OEM4 – Honeywell HG1700 AG58 IMU data. Datum: WGS84, SUTM53. Grid spacing: 500 m. Color scale bar: meters relative to WGS84 ellipsoid. Mean altimetry: 275 m (±5 m standard deviation). Swath over seawater: ~170 m.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Section of sea surface topography between Kirkpatrick Point (Remarkable Rocks) to the west (50 m above sea level), and Sanderson Bay to the east (Flight Section C, <a href="#remotesensing-03-01983-f011" class="html-fig">Figure 11</a>). Q240-HG1700 AG58 IMU data. Datum: WGS84, SUTM53. Grid spacing: 500 m. Color scale bar: meters relative to WGS84 ellipsoid. Mean altimetry over seawater: 304 m (±8 m standard deviation).</p>
Full article ">
3758 KiB  
Article
ICESat/GLAS Data as a Measurement Tool for Peatland Topography and Peat Swamp Forest Biomass in Kalimantan, Indonesia
by Uwe Ballhorn, Juilson Jubanski and Florian Siegert
Remote Sens. 2011, 3(9), 1957-1982; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs3091957 - 2 Sep 2011
Cited by 46 | Viewed by 12447
Abstract
Indonesian peatlands are one of the largest near-surface pools of terrestrial organic carbon. Persistent logging, drainage and recurrent fires lead to huge emission of carbon each year. Since tropical peatlands are highly inaccessible, few measurements on peat depth and forest biomass are available. [...] Read more.
Indonesian peatlands are one of the largest near-surface pools of terrestrial organic carbon. Persistent logging, drainage and recurrent fires lead to huge emission of carbon each year. Since tropical peatlands are highly inaccessible, few measurements on peat depth and forest biomass are available. We assessed the applicability of quality filtered ICESat/GLAS (a spaceborne LiDAR system) data to measure peatland topography as a proxy for peat volume and to estimate peat swamp forest Above Ground Biomass (AGB) in a thoroughly investigated study site in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Mean Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) elevation was correlated to the corresponding ICESat/GLAS elevation. The best results were obtained from the waveform centroid (R2 = 0.92; n = 4,186). ICESat/GLAS terrain elevation was correlated to three 3D peatland elevation models derived from SRTM data (R2 = 0.90; overall difference = ?1.0 m, ±3.2 m; n = 4,045). Based on the correlation of in situ peat swamp forest AGB and airborne LiDAR data (R2 = 0.75, n = 36) an ICESat/GLAS AGB prediction model was developed (R2 = 0.61, n = 35). These results demonstrate that ICESat/GLAS data can be used to measure peat topography and to collect large numbers of forest biomass samples in remote and highly inaccessible peatland forests. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Laser Scanning in Forests)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Overview of the study area: <b>(A</b><b>)</b>: The island of Borneo and the peatland extent within Kalimantan, Indonesia, derived from maps prepared by Wetland International [<a href="#B32-remotesensing-03-01957" class="html-bibr">32</a>]. Shown are the ICESat/GLAS transects from the years 2003 to 2009, which were used in this study (shots with incorrect elevation flags were filtered out), superimposed on Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) data; <b>(B</b><b>)</b>: Location of the investigated 3D peat models and the LiDAR stripes intersecting ICESat/GLAS data within Central Kalimantan superimposed on Landsat TM and ETM+ data (bands 5, 4, 3). Peatland extent (orange outline) and the examined ICESat/GLAS data from the years 2003 to 2009 are also indicated. The red rectangle in (A) shows the location and extent of (B).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Simplified ICESat/GLAS waveform with four Gaussian peaks. On the left, the location of the different ICESat/GLAS elevations is depicted and, on the right, the varying ICESat/GLAS height metrics derived from them are shown. The Signal Begin and the Signal End of the waveform are defined by the crossing of an Alternate Threshold (dashed line).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Correlation of the airborne LiDAR derived DTMs and the Differential Global Positions System (DGPS) points collected in the field (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9, n = 201). Also shown are the 95% confidence intervals.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Overview of the methodology to derive Above Ground Biomass (AGB) values from the field plots (left), the development of AGB models by correlating AGB from the field to airborne LiDAR 3D point clouds statistics (middle), and the correlation of ICESat/GLAS elevations and height metrics to LiDAR 3D point cloud statistics and the development of a AGB model by correlating AGB results from the airborne LiDAR AGB model to ICESat/GLAS height metrics (right).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Conceptual overview of the methodology used in this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Scatter plots displaying the correlation between ICESat/GLAS signal begin, waveform centroid, and signal end elevations a.s.l. (m) to the mean elevation a.s.l. (m) of the corresponding SRTM data. All ICESat/GLAS footprints are from the year 2003 and located on peatlands. The elevation of the waveform centroid with a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.92 shows the highest correlation to the SRTM data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>ICESat/GLAS transect covering the Sebangau peatland area from south to north. The transect of 98 km length starts at the ocean in the south then transects heavily degraded forest, logged peat swamp forest, an old burn scar, and further north a lake, and peat swamp forest again. (<b>A</b>): ICESat/GLAS transect superimposed on a Landsat ETM+ image (22-05-2003, bands 5, 4, 3). Bright green represents degraded forest, dark green peat swamp forest. <b>A1–A3</b>: Three enlarged areas within this ICESat/GLAS footprint transect. The locations of these areas are indicated by the three black rectangles in A; (<b>B</b>): Elevation profile of the ICESat/GLAS transect. Shown are the ICESat/GLAS elevations for the forest canopy (green) and the peat surface (blue). Note the curvature of the peat dome. Also displayed is the mean elevation at footprint location from the SRTM data (black). The locations of a peat swamp forest fragment, two low pole peat swamp forest transition zones, and an old burn scar are indicated by black arrows; (<b>C</b>): Measurement of absolute vegetation height by subtracting ICESat/GLAS peat surface elevation from ICESat/GLAS forest canopy signals (ICESat/GLAS height metric H5).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Scatter plot displaying the correlation between the Above Ground Biomass (AGB), calculated from field plots, to the centroid of the airborne LiDAR point cloud height histogram (CL). The sizes of the circles represent the average LiDAR point density per square meter (small = lower average LiDAR point density per square meter; big = higher average LiDAR point density per square meter).</p>
Full article ">
7277 KiB  
Article
A Multi-Resolution Multi-Temporal Technique for Detecting and Mapping Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon Rainforest
by Egídio Arai, Yosio E. Shimabukuro, Gabriel Pereira and Nandamudi L. Vijaykumar
Remote Sens. 2011, 3(9), 1943-1956; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs3091943 - 1 Sep 2011
Cited by 30 | Viewed by 11255
Abstract
The analysis of rapid environment changes requires orbital sensors with high frequency of data acquisition to minimize cloud interference in the study of dynamic processes such as Amazon tropical deforestation. Moreover, a medium to high spatial resolution data is required due to the [...] Read more.
The analysis of rapid environment changes requires orbital sensors with high frequency of data acquisition to minimize cloud interference in the study of dynamic processes such as Amazon tropical deforestation. Moreover, a medium to high spatial resolution data is required due to the nature and complexity of variables involved in the process. In this paper we describe a multiresolution multitemporal technique to simulate Landsat 7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+) image using Terra Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS). The proposed method preserves the spectral resolution and increases the spatial resolution for mapping Amazon Rainfores deforestation using low computational resources. To evaluate this technique, sample images were acquired in the Amazon rainforest border (MODIS tile H12-V10 and ETM+/Landsat 7 path 227 row 68) for 17 July 2002 and 05 October 2002. The MODIS-based simulated ETM+ and the corresponding original ETM+ images were compared through a linear regression method. Additionally, the bootstrap technique was used to calculate the confidence interval for the model to estimate and to perform a sensibility analysis. Moreover, a Linear Spectral Mixing Model, which is the technique used for deforestation mapping in Program for Deforestation Assessment in the Brazilian Legal Amazonia (PRODES) developed by National Institute for Space Research (INPE), was applied to analyze the differences in deforestation estimates. The results showed high correlations, with values between 0.70 and 0.94 (p < 0.05, student’s t test) for all ETM+ bands, indicating a good assessment between simulated and observed data (p < 0.05, Z-test). Moreover, simulated image showed a good agreement with a reference image, originating commission errors of 1% of total area estimated as deforestation in a sample area test. Furthermore, approximately 6% or 70 km² of deforestation areas were missing in simulated image classification. Therefore, the use of Landsat simulated image provides better deforestation estimation than MODIS alone. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p><b>(a)</b> Study area located in Mato Grosso State, Brazilian Amazon, corresponding to the Path 227/Row 68 of Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+) Landsat 7; and <b>(b)</b> annual deforestation estimates of Mato Grosso.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Methodological procedure to originate the mask of the contribution of ETM+ pixels to the corresponding MODIS reference date pixel (Step 1), and to originate the image by application of the mask in MODIS target date pixel.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p><b>(a)</b> ETM+ reference date of 17 July, 2002 (3B4G5R); <b>(b)</b> MODIS reference date of 17 July 2002 (1B2G6R); <b>(c)</b> MODIS 05 October, 2002 target date image (1B2G6R); <b>(d)</b> ETM+ image of 05 October, 2002 (3B4G5R); and <b>(e)</b> MODIS-based simulated ETM+ image of 05 October 2002 (3B4G5R).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Linear Regression and slope distributions using the bootstrap technique developed by [<a href="#B36-remotesensing-03-01943" class="html-bibr">36</a>] for shortwave ETM+/Landsat 7 and MODIS-based simulated ETM+ bands.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>05 October 2002, Isoseg classifications of soil fraction images: <b>(a)</b> ETM+ image; <b>(b)</b> MODIS-based simulated ETM image; <b>(c)</b> MODIS image.</p>
Full article ">
2794 KiB  
Article
AMARTIS v2: 3D Radiative Transfer Code in the [0.4; 2.5 µm] Spectral Domain Dedicated to Urban Areas
by Colin Thomas, Stéphanie Doz, Xavier Briottet and Sophie Lachérade
Remote Sens. 2011, 3(9), 1914-1942; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs3091914 - 31 Aug 2011
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 7529
Abstract
The availability of new very high spatial resolution sensors has for the past few years allowed a precise description of urban areas, and thus the settlement of specific ground or atmosphere characterization methods. However, in order to develop such techniques, a radiative transfer [...] Read more.
The availability of new very high spatial resolution sensors has for the past few years allowed a precise description of urban areas, and thus the settlement of specific ground or atmosphere characterization methods. However, in order to develop such techniques, a radiative transfer tool dedicated to such an area is necessary. AMARTIS v2 is a new radiative transfer code derived from the radiative transfer code AMARTIS specifically dedicated to urban areas. It allows to simulate airborne and spaceborne multiangular observations of 3D scenes in the [0.4; 2.5µm] domain with the ground’s geometry, urban materials optical properties, atmospheric modeling and sensor characteristics entirely defined by the user. After a general presentation of AMARTIS v2 and a description of the performed calculations, results of radiometric intercomparisons with other radiative transfer codes are presented and the new offered potentials are illustrated with four realistic examples, representative of current issues in urban areas remote sensing. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hyperspectral Remote Sensing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Image of Toulon (France) acquired by PELICAN multispectral sensor at a 20 cm spatial resolution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Definition of the zenith and azimuth angles of the sensor (θ<sub>V</sub>, φ<sub>V</sub>) and of the sun (θ<sub>S</sub>, φ<sub>S</sub>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Components of the irradiance at ground level (<b>a</b>) and of the radiance at sensor level (<b>b</b>). The direct irradiance (<span class="html-italic">I<sub>dir</sub></span>) corresponds to the photons coming directly from the sun, the scattered irradiance (<span class="html-italic">I<sub>diff</sub></span>) to the photons scattered by the atmosphere, the Earth-atmosphere coupling irradiance (<span class="html-italic">I<sub>coup</sub></span>) to the photons resulting from multiple surface reflections and atmospheric scatterings, and the downward reflected irradiance (<span class="html-italic">I<sub>refl</sub></span>) to the photons that are directly transmitted to the ground after reflection from the neighborhood. The direct radiance (<span class="html-italic">R<sub>dir</sub></span>) corresponds to the photons coming from the surface directly; the environment radiance (<span class="html-italic">R<sub>env</sub></span>) to the photons coming from the surface after scattering by the atmosphere; and the atmospheric radiance (<span class="html-italic">R<sub>atm</sub></span>) to the photons that have been scattered by the atmosphere without reaching the surface.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Geometry and reflectances of the scenes used to compute the comparison simulations between AMARTIS v1 and AMARTIS v2: street configuration <b>(a)</b> and mountainous configuration <b>(b)</b>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparison of simulation results obtained with AMARTIS v1 (thin line) and AMARTIS v2 (thick line) in the mountainous case No. 2 (<span class="html-italic">cf.</span> <a href="#remotesensing-03-01914-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a>) at 870 nm with a visibility of 23 km. The reflectance of the ground is 0.1 except at the top of the relief where it is 0.5.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparison of simulation results obtained with AMARTIS v1 (thin line) and AMARTIS v2 (thick line) in the street case No. 1 (<span class="html-italic">cf.</span> <a href="#remotesensing-03-01914-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a>) at 440 nm with a visibility of 5 km.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Synthetic urban canyon <b>(a)</b> and representation of the corresponding triangular scene facets <b>(b)</b>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Ground irradiances <b>(a–d)</b> in W.m<sup>−2</sup>.µm<sup>−1</sup> and at sensor radiances <b>(e–h)</b> in W.m<sup>−2</sup>.µm<sup>−1</sup>.sr<sup>−1</sup> at 670 nm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Illustration of a very high reflection of light on windows in shadows (PELICAN image acquired over Toulouse’s “Conseil Général”).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Description of the urban canyon.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Downward reflected irradiance, <span class="html-italic">I<sub>refl</sub></span>, at ground level (W.m<sup>−2</sup>.µm<sup>−1</sup>) (<b>a</b>) and total radiance, <span class="html-italic">R<sub>tot</sub></span>, at sensor level (W.m<sup>−2</sup>. sr<sup>−1</sup>.µm<sup>−1</sup>) (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Downward reflected irradiance at ground level and total radiance at sensor level in the middle of the street (white line on <a href="#remotesensing-03-01914-f011" class="html-fig">Figure 11</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Geometry of the crossroad.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Total radiance at sensor level (W.m<sup>−2</sup>. sr<sup>−1</sup>.µm<sup>−1</sup>) at 440 nm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Relative contributions of irradiance contributors for point A in the sun (<b>a</b>) and point B in the shadow (<b>b</b>) at 440 nm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Relative contributions of radiance contributors at sensor level for point A in the sun (<b>a</b>) and point B in the shadow (<b>b</b>) at 440 nm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Relative contributions of every at-sensor radiance for point A in the sun (<b>a</b>) and point B in the shadow (<b>b</b>) at 870 nm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Top view of the urban pattern and the related aggregated area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Polar representations of street aggregated radiances at 670 nm where the sun is represented by a black star. The aggregated radiances given on the graphs are in W.m<sup>−2</sup>.sr<sup>−1</sup>.µm<sup>−1</sup>. In the first case, sun zenith and azimuth angles are respectively equal to 30° and 120° (<b>a</b>) and in the second case, sun zenith and azimuth angles are respectively equal to 60° and 120° (<b>b</b>). The 0° azimuth angle points to the north.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Spectral lambertian reflectances of urban materials.</p>
Full article ">
510 KiB  
Article
Evaluating the Correctness of Airborne Laser Scanning Data Heights Using Vehicle-Based RTK and VRS GPS Observations
by Satu Dahlqvist, Petri Rönnholm, Panu Salo and Martin Vermeer
Remote Sens. 2011, 3(9), 1902-1913; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs3091902 - 31 Aug 2011
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 7081
Abstract
In this study, we describe a system in which a GPS receiver mounted on the roof of a car is used to provide reference information to evaluate the elevation accuracy and georeferencing of airborne laser scanning (ALS) point clouds. The concept was evaluated [...] Read more.
In this study, we describe a system in which a GPS receiver mounted on the roof of a car is used to provide reference information to evaluate the elevation accuracy and georeferencing of airborne laser scanning (ALS) point clouds. The concept was evaluated in the Klaukkala test area where a number of roads were traversed to collect real-time kinematic data. Two test cases were evaluated, including one case using the real-time kinematic (RTK) method with a dedicated GPS base station at a known benchmark in the area and another case using the GNSSnet virtual reference station service (VRS). The utility of both GPS methods was confirmed. When all test data were included, the mean difference between ALS data and GPS-based observations was ?2.4 cm for both RTK and VRS GPS cases. The corresponding dispersions were ±4.5 cm and ±5.9 cm, respectively. In addition, our examination did not reveal the presence of any significant rotation between ALS and GPS data. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>A Topcon HiPer Pro GPS+ receiver is shown on the reference point (left) and mounted on the top of the vehicle (right). (Photo: Panu Salo).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Determination of the distance between the road surface and the GPS antenna. The height level of the road was measured close to each tire. These four measurements were averaged to obtain an estimate for the general level of the ground surface. Next, this height value was subtracted from the observed height value of the GPS receiver mounted on the top of the vehicle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Virtual reference station (VRS) GPS observations along the test area roads. Left: The complete test area. The VRS virtual reference station was provided by Geotrim Oy (GNSSNet.fi). Right: A detailed view from the test area (the area marked with a square in the left image). GPS observations are illustrated with black crosses, and airborne laser scanning (ALS) points near GPS observations are represented by green dots.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Real-time kinematic (RTK) GPS observations along the test area roads. Left: The complete test area. The RTK reference station is marked with a triangle. Right: A detailed view from the test area; the location of the detailed view is marked with a square in the left image. GPS observations are illustrated with black crosses, and ALS points near GPS observations are represented by green dots.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Interpolation using four ALS points (green) to attain points corresponding with GPS observations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>ALS data were evaluated within five sub-areas due to their different characteristics.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Visualization of height differences between VRS GPS and RTK GPS measurements. Points were included only when the distance between corresponding points was less than 30 cm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Visualization of height differences between RTK GPS measurements and interpolated ALS points.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Visualization of height differences between VRS GPS measurements and interpolated ALS points.</p>
Full article ">
1300 KiB  
Article
LIDAR and SODAR Measurements of Wind Speed and Direction in Upland Terrain for Wind Energy Purposes
by Steven Lang and Eamon McKeogh
Remote Sens. 2011, 3(9), 1871-1901; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs3091871 - 25 Aug 2011
Cited by 99 | Viewed by 21981
Abstract
Detailed knowledge of the wind resource is necessary in the developmental and operational stages of a wind farm site. As wind turbines continue to grow in size, masts for mounting cup anemometers—the accepted standard for resource assessment—have necessarily become much taller, and much [...] Read more.
Detailed knowledge of the wind resource is necessary in the developmental and operational stages of a wind farm site. As wind turbines continue to grow in size, masts for mounting cup anemometers—the accepted standard for resource assessment—have necessarily become much taller, and much more expensive. This limitation has driven the commercialization of two remote sensing (RS) tools for the wind energy industry: The LIDAR and the SODAR, Doppler effect instruments using light and sound, respectively. They are ground-based and can work over hundreds of meters, sufficient for the tallest turbines in, or planned for, production. This study compares wind measurements from two commercial RS instruments against an instrumented mast, in upland (semi-complex) terrain typical of where many wind farms are now being installed worldwide. With appropriate filtering, regression analyses suggest a good correlation between the RS instruments and mast instruments: The RS instruments generally recorded lower wind speeds than the cup anemometers, with the LIDAR more accurate and the SODAR more precise. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing for Sustainable Energy Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p><b>(a)</b> Site layout plan; and <b>(b)</b> photograph of 80 m instrumented mast (view from northwest, with southeastern wind turbine, T2, in the background).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Wind speed and direction at top of mast during measurement period (unfiltered data).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Mast instruments: Comparison between <b>(a)</b> 80 m top-mounted cup anemometers, and <b>(b)</b> wind vanes (78 m and 45 m). (February–May; 10 min averages).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Directional variation in ratio of 80 m top-mounted anemometer wind speeds. (February–May; 10 min averages).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparison of 80 m wind speeds from cup anemometer (Mast), LIDAR and SODAR. (Raw, <span class="html-italic">unfiltered</span> data; 10 min averages).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparison of 80 m wind speeds with WS1 cup anemometer (Mast): <b>(a)</b> LIDAR and cup; and <b>(b)</b> SODAR and cup, (February–May; 10 min averages).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>LIDAR-Cup<b> (a,c)</b> and SODAR-Cup <b>(b,d)</b> wind speed differences, as a function of wind speed <b>(a,b)</b> and direction <b>(c,d)</b>; <span class="html-italic">Filtered by direction and data quality parameter only. </span>(February–May; 10 min averages).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p><b>(a)</b> LIDAR-Cup and <b>(b)</b> SODAR-Cup wind speed differences and rain; and internal quality parameters and rain: <b>(c)</b> LIDAR (PiF and PiA) and <b>(d)</b> SODAR (SNR). (Unfiltered; March data only; 10 min averages).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparison of 100 m (<b>a</b>) wind speed; and (<b>b</b>) wind direction, from LIDAR and SODAR. (February–May; 10 min averages).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Comparisons of wind direction from <b>(a)</b> LIDAR (80 m) and Mast (78 m); and <b>(b)</b> SODAR (80 m) and Mast (78 m). (February–May; 10 min averages).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Standard deviation of 80 m wind speed: (<b>a</b>) LIDAR, (<b>b</b>) SODAR. (February–May; 10 min averages).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Selected meteorological characteristics for March 2008.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Selected Glasgow Airport METARS observations for March 2008.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>(<b>a</b>) LIDAR-Cup, and (<b>b</b>) SODAR-Cup, wind speed differences, as a function of wind shear exponent, α (February–May; 10 min averages).</p>
Full article ">
2049 KiB  
Article
Mapping Infrared Data on Terrestrial Laser Scanning 3D Models of Buildings
by Mario Ivan Alba, Luigi Barazzetti, Marco Scaioni, Elisabetta Rosina and Mattia Previtali
Remote Sens. 2011, 3(9), 1847-1870; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs3091847 - 25 Aug 2011
Cited by 89 | Viewed by 15244
Abstract
A new 3D acquisition and processing procedure to map RGB, thermal IR and near infrared images (NIR) on a detailed 3D model of a building is presented. The combination and fusion of different data sources allows the generation of 3D thermal data useful [...] Read more.
A new 3D acquisition and processing procedure to map RGB, thermal IR and near infrared images (NIR) on a detailed 3D model of a building is presented. The combination and fusion of different data sources allows the generation of 3D thermal data useful for different purposes such as localization, visualization, and analysis of anomalies in contemporary architecture. The classic approach, which is currently used to map IR images on 3D models, is based on the direct registration of each single image by using space resection or homography. This approach is largely time consuming and in many cases suffers from poor object texture. To overcome these drawbacks, a “bi-camera” system coupling a thermal IR camera to a RGB camera has been setup. The second sensor is used to orient the “bi-camera” through a photogrammetric network also including free-handled camera stations to strengthen the block geometry. In many cases the bundle adjustment can be executed through a procedure for automatic extraction of tie points. Terrestrial laser scanning is adopted to retrieve the 3D model building. The integration of a low-cost NIR camera accumulates further radiometric information on the final 3D model. The use of such a sensor has not been exploited until now to assess the conservation state of buildings. Here some interesting findings from this kind of analysis are reported. The paper shows the methodology and its experimental application to a couple of buildings in the main Campus of Politecnico di Milano University, where IR thermography has previously been carried out for conservation and maintenance purposes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Terrestrial Laser Scanning)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Pictures of some frameworks adopted for camera calibration: <b>(a)</b> wooden panel with iron nails adopted for <span class="html-italic">field-calibration</span> in laboratory; <b>(b</b>,<b>c)</b> examples of objects used for self calibration through <span class="html-italic">free-net bundle adjustment</span>; <b>(d)</b> example of a block of IR images adopted for calibration. The presence of rolled images is aimed at de-correlating the estimated parameters [<a href="#B10-remotesensing-03-01847" class="html-bibr">10</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Some examples of buildings modeled by diverse approaches: (<b>a</b>) Photogrammetric reconstruction based on manual measurements-courtesy of Gabriele Fangi; (<b>b</b>) Photogrammetric reconstruction completely based on image matching; (<b>c</b>) TLS reconstruction textured by using RGB images (Alippi’s tower, Mandello Lario, Italy).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Example of data acquisition process for mapping IR/NIR/RGB images on a 3D model of a building.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Couple of thermal IR images of overlapping portions of the same facade taken at different epochs (1 h). The use of a color palette shows the strong differences due to temperature changes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Data acquisition systems: <b>(a)</b> “Bi-camera” system, including a Nikon D80 SLR (3,872 × 2,592 px, f = 20 mm) and an IR Thermocamera camera AVIO (320 × 240 px, equipped with an uncooled microbolometric detector, resolution 0.08 K; FoV 26° × 19,6°, IFOV 1.4 mrad, f = 74 mm); <b>(b)</b> “Bi-camera” system, including a Nikon D80 SLR and an IR Thermocamera NEC H2640 (640 × 480 px, equipped with a UFPA detector, resolution 0.03 K; FoV 21.7° × 16.4°, IFOV 0.6 mrad, f = 50 mm); <b>(c)</b> TLS Riegl LMS-Z420i integrating a SLR camera Nikon D100 (3,008 × 2,000, f = 20 mm) to gather RGB or NIR images.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The use of the “bi-camera” system allows the orientation of thermal images where no distinctive elements are present, as in the example below derived from the case study in <a href="#sec6dot2-remotesensing-03-01847" class="html-sec">Section 6.2</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>A portion of the building in the case study reported in <a href="#sec6dot2-remotesensing-03-01847" class="html-sec">Section 6.2</a> that has been textured by different kinds of multispectral images. From left to right: thermal IR, RGB, NIR, laser return intensity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Thermal IR images mapped onto the laser model of “Rector’s office”. <b>(a)</b> Global view of the full textured 3D model; <b>(b</b>–<b>d)</b> Details on different parts of the façade, with some windows where different kinds of damages have been detected.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The “Trifoglio” building surveyed with the proposed technique. The squares illustrate the areas where some anomalies were found. The discontinuities in the overlapping zones are due to the variation of the temperature during the image acquisition phase.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Some details of NIR images captured on the “Trifoglio” building. As can be seen in all sub-images, some groups of tiles appear in a lighter color intensity than background. This radiometric response in the NIR wavelength does not correspond to correlated areas in other kinds of images, but reveals that some groups of tiles might have different chemical or geometrical properties on their surface.</p>
Full article ">
321 KiB  
Review
Can the Future EnMAP Mission Contribute to Urban Applications? A Literature Survey
by Wieke Heldens, Uta Heiden, Thomas Esch, Enrico Stein and Andreas Müller
Remote Sens. 2011, 3(9), 1817-1846; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs3091817 - 25 Aug 2011
Cited by 53 | Viewed by 9569
Abstract
With urban populations and their footprints growing globally, the need to assess the dynamics of the urban environment increases. Remote sensing is one approach that can analyze these developments quantitatively with respect to spatially and temporally large scale changes. With the 2015 launch [...] Read more.
With urban populations and their footprints growing globally, the need to assess the dynamics of the urban environment increases. Remote sensing is one approach that can analyze these developments quantitatively with respect to spatially and temporally large scale changes. With the 2015 launch of the spaceborne EnMAP mission, a new hyperspectral sensor with high signal-to-noise ratio at medium spatial resolution, and a 21 day global revisit capability will become available. This paper presents the results of a literature survey on existing applications and image analysis techniques in the context of urban remote sensing in order to identify and outline potential contributions of the future EnMAP mission. Regarding urban applications, four frequently addressed topics have been identified: urban development and planning, urban growth assessment, risk and vulnerability assessment and urban climate. The requirements of four application fields and associated image processing techniques used to retrieve desired parameters and create geo-information products have been reviewed. As a result, we identified promising research directions enabling the use of EnMAP for urban studies. First and foremost, research is required to analyze the spectral information content of an EnMAP pixel used to support material-based land cover mapping approaches. This information can subsequently be used to improve urban indicators, such as imperviousness. Second, we identified the global monitoring of urban areas as a promising field of investigation taking advantage of EnMAP’s spatial coverage and revisit capability. However, owing to the limitations of EnMAPs spatial resolution for urban applications, research should also focus on hyperspectral resolution enhancement to enable retrieving material information on sub-pixel level. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urban Remote Sensing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Spectral mixed pixels: simulated 30 m pixel resolution like planned for EnMAP HSI sensor <b>(a)</b> and 4 m pixel resolution in comparison <b>(b)</b>.Spectral mixed pixels: simulated 30 m pixel resolution like planned for EnMAP HSI sensor (a) and 4 m pixel resolution in comparison (b)</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Spectral signatures of typical urban surface materials with its material-specific reflectance characteristics; multispectral systems, such as the Landsat TM 7 sensor, are not able to record the narrow spectral characteristics due to the broad spectral bands.Spectral signatures of typical urban surface materials with its material-specific reflectance characteristics; multispectral systems, such as the Landsat TM 7 sensor, are not able to record the narrow spectral characteristics due to the broad spectral bands</p>
Full article ">
407 KiB  
Article
Downscaling Pesticide Use Data to the Crop Field Level in California Using Landsat Satellite Imagery: Paraquat Case Study
by Susan K. Maxwell
Remote Sens. 2011, 3(9), 1805-1816; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs3091805 - 25 Aug 2011
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 8192
Abstract
Exposure to pesticides has been associated with increased risk of many adverse health effects. To understand the relationships between pesticide exposure and health outcomes, epidemiologists need information on where pesticides are applied in the environment. California maintains one of the most comprehensive pesticide [...] Read more.
Exposure to pesticides has been associated with increased risk of many adverse health effects. To understand the relationships between pesticide exposure and health outcomes, epidemiologists need information on where pesticides are applied in the environment. California maintains one of the most comprehensive pesticide use reporting systems in the world, yet the data are only recorded at a coarse geographic scale of approximately 2.6 km2 area. A method is presented that uses Landsat image time series to downscale California pesticide use data to the crop field-level. The approach is demonstrated using paraquat applied to vineyard and cotton fields. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing in Public Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study area. California Central Valley agricultural region (green) with approximate location of study area (black outline).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>System diagram for integrating Landsat image time series, Section-level pesticide use data, and a crop signature library to map pesticide use at the field-level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Landsat time series color composite image (left, PCA123) and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) time series plots (right) for selected crop fields within Section 14S17E01. Paraquat was applied to two vineyard fields. Five of the six field units (identified as a white “V” on the image and blue lines in the graph) identified as vineyard on the California Department of Water Resources (CDWR) map had NDVI time series closely matching vineyard library signatures (median ≤ 0.09). One field unit identified as vineyard on the CDWR map appeared to be newly planted (white “V” inside of white box). The difference value was greater for this field (0.17) because the library did not contain signatures for newly planted vineyards. Identification of the specific two fields that were sprayed with paraquat was not possible in this example because more than two fields were identified as vineyards within the Section.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Landsat time series color composite image (PCA123) and NDVI time series plots for selected crop fields within Section 16S17E01. Paraquat was applied to one cotton field. The field with the closest match to cotton is identified as a white “C” on the image to the left and black line in the graph on the right. Identification of the specific field sprayed with paraquat was possible in this example.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Landsat time series color composite image (left, PCA123) and NDVI time series plots (right) for all crop fields within Section 17S17E01. Paraquat was applied to one cotton field. Only one field had NDVI time series values similar to cotton (identified as a white “C” on the image to the left and black line in the graph on the right). The specific field where paraquat was applied was correctly identified in this example.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Landsat time series color composite image (left, PCA123) and NDVI time series plots (right) for all crop fields within Section 18S17E01. Paraquat was applied to two cotton fields. Two fields had NDVI time series values similar to cotton (identified as a white letter “C” on the image and black and purple dashed lines in the graph. Both fields closely matched signatures in the library (median difference ≤ 0.09). The specific <span class="html-italic">fields</span> where paraquat was applied were identifiable in this case. Determining which paraquat application was applied to which cotton field was not possible.</p>
Full article ">
Previous Issue
Next Issue
Back to TopTop