<p>AAV administration increases ERα expression in the liver and not in other tissues. Analysis of ERα overexpression in different tissues using RT-qPCR and Western blotting. (<b>A</b>) Esr1 mRNA expression in the liver of RC-fed mice. (<b>B</b>) Esr1 mRNA expression in the liver of mice fed HFD. (<b>C</b>) ERα protein expression in the liver of mice fed RC. (<b>D</b>) ERα protein expression in the liver of mice fed HFD. (<b>E</b>) ERα protein qualitative analysis in mice fed RC and HFD, using ImageJ. (<b>F</b>) ERα protein expression in the muscle of mice fed RC. (<b>G</b>) ERα protein expression in the muscle of mice fed HFD. (<b>H</b>) ERα protein expression in the brown adipose tissue of mice fed RC. (<b>I</b>) ERα protein expression in the brown adipose tissue of mice fed HFD. (<b>J</b>) ERα protein qualitative analysis in the muscle of mice fed RC and HFD, using ImageJ. (<b>K</b>) ERα protein qualitative analysis in WAT in mice fed RC and HFD, using ImageJ. Data are represented as means ± SEM (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 5–10), with differences considered significant when <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.05. In A–D and F–I analysis, <span class="html-italic">T</span> test was performed, significance level <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.05. (*** <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.001); (**** <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.0001).</p> Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Overexpression of ERα in the liver improves the body composition of mice fed RC. Analysis of the body composition of mice fed RC and HFD. (<b>A</b>) Comparative analysis of weight before and after virus inoculation in mice fed RC. (<b>B</b>) Comparative analysis of weight before and after virus inoculation in mice fed an HFD. (<b>C</b>) Percentual changing in body weight of mice. (<b>D</b>) Lean mass of mice fed RC. (<b>E</b>) Lean mass of mice fed HFD. (<b>F</b>) Total fat of mice fed RC. (<b>G</b>) Total fat of mice fed HFD. (<b>H</b>) Retroperitoneal fat through magnetic resonance imaging of RC-fed mice. (<b>I</b>) Retroperitoneal fat through magnetic resonance imaging of mice fed HFD. (<b>J</b>) Perigonadal fat through magnetic resonance imaging of RC-fed mice. (<b>K</b>) Perigonadal fat on MRI scans of mice fed HFD. Data are represented as means ± SEM (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 5–10), with differences considered significant when <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.05. In A and B, a two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-hoc was performed. For C–J analysis, <span class="html-italic">T</span> test was performed, significance level <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.05. (* <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.05); (** <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.01); (**** <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.0001).</p> Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Overexpression of ERα is involved in glucose metabolism in mice fed an HFD. Evaluation of glucose metabolism using ipGTT. (<b>A</b>) Fasting glycemia of mice fed RC. (<b>B</b>) Fasting glycemia of mice fed an HFD. (<b>C</b>) Fasting insulin in mice fed RC. (<b>D</b>) Fasting insulin in mice fed an HFD. (<b>E</b>) GTT curve analysis. (<b>F</b>) Area under the curve of mice fed RC. (<b>G</b>) Area under the curve of mice fed HFD. Data are represented as means ± SEM (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 5–10), with differences considered significant when <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.05. In A–D, F, and G analysis, <span class="html-italic">T</span> test was performed, significance level <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.05. For E, a two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-hoc was performed. (* <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.05).</p> Full article ">Figure 4
<p>ERα overexpression regulates insulin sensitivity. (<b>A</b>) The glucose infusion rate (GIR) and plasma glucose curve during clamp. (<b>B</b>) Average of GIR during the last 40 min of the clamp. (<b>C</b>) Whole-body glucose disappearance during clamp. (<b>D</b>) Basal endogenous glucose production (EGP) and clamp EGP. (<b>E</b>) Suppression percentage of EGP. (<b>F</b>) Basal and clamp non-esterified fatty acids (NEFAs). (<b>G</b>) Insulin-stimulated NEFA suppression during the clamp. Data are represented as means ± SEM (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 5–10), with differences considered significant when <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.05. In A and F, a two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-hoc was performed. For B–E and G analysis, <span class="html-italic">T</span> test was performed, significance level <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.05. (** <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.01).</p> Full article ">Figure 5
<p>ERα overexpression regulates hepatic lipid content. Analysis of quantitative TAG dosage in the liver of mice fed RC and an HFD. (<b>A</b>) TAG content in the liver of mice fed RC. (<b>B</b>) TAG content in the liver of mice fed an HFD. (<b>C</b>) Quantitative analysis of lipid droplets by Oil Red O in mice fed an HFD. (<b>D</b>) Representative image of the liver, stained with Oil Red O. Data are represented as means ± SEM (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 5–10), with differences considered significant when <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.05. In A, B, and C analysis, T test was performed, significance level <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.05. (* <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.05).</p> Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Overexpression of ERα increases cellular respiratory capacity. Analysis of mitochondrial function in animals fed RC and an HFD. (<b>A</b>) Basal O2 consumption rates (OCR) in isolated hepatocytes. (<b>B</b>) Maximum O2 consumption rates (OCR) in isolated hepatocytes. (<b>C</b>) VDAC1 protein expression in mice fed RC. (<b>D</b>) VDAC1 protein expression in mice fed an HFD. (<b>E</b>) VDAC1 protein qualitative analysis using ImageJ. (<b>F</b>) Total OXPHOS protein expression in mice fed RC. (<b>G</b>) Total OXPHOS protein expression in mice fed an HFD. (<b>H</b>) Total OXPHOS protein qualitative images from mice fed RC. (<b>I</b>) Total OXPHOS protein qualitative images from mice fed an HFD. Data are represented as means ± SEM (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 5–10), with differences considered significant when <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.05. In A–B and D–E analysis <span class="html-italic">T</span> test was performed, significance level <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.05. (* <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.05); (*** <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.001).</p> Full article ">