The Ethical Treatment of Artificially Conscious Robots

1. Aleksander I (1995) Artificial neuroconsciousness: an update. IWANN, available at http://www.ee.ic.ac.uk/research/neural/publications.iwann.html

2. Arkin R (2007) Lethality and autonomous robots: an ethical stance. In: ICRA ’07: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Rome

3. Billings L (2007) Rise of roboethics. Grappling with the implications of an artificially intelligent culture. Available at www.seedmagazine.com/news/2007/07/rise_of_roboethics.php?

4. Calverley D (2005) Toward a method for determining the legal status of a conscious machine. In: Chrisley R, Clowes R, Torrance S (eds) Proceedings of the AISB 2005 symposium on next generation approaches to machine consciousness: imagination, development, intersubjectivity, and embodiment. University of Hertfordshire

5. Calverley D (2005) Android science and the animal rights movement: are there analogies? In: Cognitive sciences society workshop, Stresa, Italy, pp 127–136

6. CBC (2007) Ethical code for robots in works, South Korea says. Available at www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2007/03/07/tech-robot-ethics.html

7. Chella A, Manzotti R (2007) Artificial consciousness. Imprint Academic, Exter

   Google Scholar 

8. Clark R, Squire L (1998) Classical conditioning and brain systems: the role of awareness. Science 280(3):77–81

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. Clark R, Squire L (1999) Human eyeblink classical conditioning: effects of manipulating awareness of the stimulus contingencies. Psychol Sci 10:14–18

   Article  Google Scholar 

10. Clowes R, Torrance S, Chrsley R (2007) Machine consciousness: embodiment and imagination. J Conscious Stud 14(7). Special issue

11. De Quincey C (2006) Switched-on consciousness: clarifying what it means. J Conscious Stud 13(4):7–12

    Google Scholar 

12. Economist (2007) Robot wars. The Economist, April 17th 2007. Available at http://www.economist.com/science/tq/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9028041

13. Freitas R Jr (1985) The legal rights of robots. Stud Lawyer 13:54–56. A later draft is available at http://www.freitas.com/Astro/LegalRightsOfRobots.html

    Google Scholar 

14. Freud S (1933) New introductory lectures on psychoanalysis. Internationaler Psychoanalytischer, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

15. Gallup G (1977) Self-recognition in primates: a comparative approach to the bidirectional properties of consciousness. Am Psychol 329–338

16. Holland O (ed) (2003) Machine consciousness. Imprint Academic, Exeter

    Google Scholar 

17. Kant I (1996) In: Heath P, Schneewind J (eds) Lectures on ethics. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

18. Koch C (2004) The quest for consciousness: a neurobiological approach. Roberts and Company, Englewood

    Google Scholar 

19. Lehman-Wilzig S (1981) Frankenstein unbound: towards a legal definition of artificial intelligence. Futures 442–457, December

20. Levy D (2006) Robots unlimited. AK Peters, Wellesley

    Google Scholar 

21. Levy D (2007) Intimate relationships with artificial partners. Ph.D. Dissertation, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

22. Levy D (2007) Love and sex with robots. Harper Collins, New York

    Google Scholar 

23. Owen J, Osley R (2007) Bill of rights for abused robots: experts draw up an ethical charter to prevent humans exploiting machines. The Independent, April 1st

24. Pinker S (1997) Could a computer ever be conscious? Available at http://pinker.wjh.harvard.edu/articles/media/1997_08_18_usnewsworldreport.html

25. Ramey C (2005) ‘For the sake of others’: the ‘personal ethics’ of human-android interaction. In: Proceedings of COGSCI workshop: toward social mechanisms of android science. Stresa, Italy, July 25–26, pp 137–148

26. Sloman A (1996) A systematic approach to consciousness. (How to avoid talking nonsense?) Summary of a lecture presented by Aaron Sloman at the Royal Society of Arts, 26 February 1996. Available at http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~axs/misc/consciousness.rsa.text

27. Solum L (1992) Legal personhood for artificial intelligences. North Carol Law Rev 70:1231–1287

    Google Scholar 

28. Sparrow R, Sparrow L (2006) In the hands of machines? The future of aged care. Minds Mach 16(2):141–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

29. Stone C (1972) Should trees have standing? Toward legal rights for natural objects. South Calif Law Rev 45:450–457

    Google Scholar 

30. Stone C (1997) ‘Should trees have standing?’ and other essays on law, morals and the environment. Kaufmann, Los Altos

    Google Scholar 

31. Takeno J, Inaba K, Suzuki T (2005) Experiments and examination of mirror image cognition using a small robot. In: The 6th IEEE international symposium on computational intelligence in robotics and automation (CIRA 2005), pp 493–498. Available at http://ieeeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=1554325

32. Torrance S (2004) Could we, should we, create conscious robots? J Health Soc Econ Issues 4(2):43–46

    Google Scholar 

33. Torrance S (2008) Ethics and consciousness in artificial agents. Artif Intell Soc 22(4)

34. Turing A (1950) Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind Q Rev Psychol Philos LIX(236):433–460

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

35. Veruggio G (2006) EURON roboethics roadmap. Genoa, Scuola di Robotica. Available at http://www.roboethics.org/site/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=14

Download references