[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book
is Finally Written!

Read Excerpts & Reviews
E-Book available
as Amazon Kindle or
at iTunes for $9.99.

Hardcopy available at Amazon
SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
Shop Amazon & Support This Blog
RECENT FORUM TOPICS
Jul 12 15:22 Marcels
Apr 16 14:31 Pitch Count Estimators
Mar 12 16:30 Appendix to THE BOOK - THE GORY DETAILS
Jan 29 09:41 NFL Overtime Idea
Jan 22 14:48 Weighting Years for NFL Player Projections
Jan 21 09:18 positional runs in pythagenpat
Oct 20 15:57 DRS: FG vs. BB-Ref

Advanced

Tangotiger Blog

A blog about baseball, hockey, life, and whatever else there is.

Thursday, September 01, 2022

Why is WAR not proportionate to IP

Having dropped the earlier bombshell this morning that pitchers of today are able to roughly keep up with pitchers of yesteryear, the question should really be: why would you think WAR would be proportionate to IP?

Suppose in 2021 we had pitcher usage like that of the 1970s, with complete games galore, smaller staffs and so on.  Then in 2022, everyone came to the realization that they want to bring in over 100 pitchers into the league.  What happens to the value of the existing pitchers?

Well, all of the pitchers that are brought up, essentially quadruple-A pitchers, would all have zero value, no WAR. It's the very definition of the "R" in WAR: wins above replacement-level. Given that WAR is a fixed amount, that means all the existing pitchers would have the same amount of WAR that they had the previous year.

You see, it doesn't matter, necessarily how many innings you throw.  What matters is how well you can pitch compared to the quadruple-A pitcher.  And if you can improve your performance on a per pitch basis and throw fewer pitches, the two combined call allow you to maintain the same level of value.  

All that's happened is that the superstars of today have shed their "replacement level" innings, which allows them to improve their rate stats (while dropping their innings). And so their quality X quantity is maintained.

This is how Kershaw, Verlander, and Scherzer can have value similar to the best pitchers of the 1970s, even though though IP totals of the 2010s would land them in 15th to 30th place in the 1970s.

And so WAR is not proportionate to IP, nor should that have been the expectation, necessarily.

() Comments • • WAR

Latest...

COMMENTS

Nov 23 14:15
Layered wOBAcon

Nov 22 22:15
Cy Young Predictor 2024

Oct 28 17:25
Layered Hit Probability breakdown

Oct 15 13:42
Binomial fun: Best-of-3-all-home is equivalent to traditional Best-of-X where X is

Oct 14 14:31
NaiveWAR and VictoryShares

Oct 02 21:23
Component Run Values: TTO and BIP

Oct 02 11:06
FRV v DRS

Sep 28 22:34
Runs Above Average

Sep 16 16:46
Skenes v Webb: Illustrating Replacement Level in WAR

Sep 16 16:43
Sacrifice Steal Attempt

Sep 09 14:47
Can Wheeler win the Cy Young in 2024?

Sep 08 13:39
Small choices, big implications, in WAR

Sep 07 09:00
Why does Baseball Reference love Erick Fedde?

Sep 03 19:42
Re-Leveraging Aaron Judge

Aug 24 14:10
Science of baseball in 1957

THREADS

September 01, 2022
Why is WAR not proportionate to IP