[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book
is Finally Written!

Read Excerpts & Reviews
E-Book available
as Amazon Kindle or
at iTunes for $9.99.

Hardcopy available at Amazon
SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
Shop Amazon & Support This Blog
RECENT FORUM TOPICS
Jul 12 15:22 Marcels
Apr 16 14:31 Pitch Count Estimators
Mar 12 16:30 Appendix to THE BOOK - THE GORY DETAILS
Jan 29 09:41 NFL Overtime Idea
Jan 22 14:48 Weighting Years for NFL Player Projections
Jan 21 09:18 positional runs in pythagenpat
Oct 20 15:57 DRS: FG vs. BB-Ref

Advanced

Tangotiger Blog

A blog about baseball, hockey, life, and whatever else there is.

Friday, December 13, 2013

WAR for pitchers on Fangraphs

Runs allowed includes the contributions of the fielders.  Therefore, it is not "descriptive" to the pitcher's contributions, but rather, to the team's contributions while the pitcher was on the mound.

FIP takes an agnostic position on all balls in park (as well as baserunning events, and sequencing of events).

WAR (at Fangraphs), by not taking an explicit position on all of that, can either be said to be: (a) remaining agnostic (b) presuming average for all players regardless of what happened.

We wouldn't, for example, consider a pitcher's Won-Loss record to be "descriptive" of his contributions would we?  No, because it's obvious how much of that is polluted by his team's offense, fielding, and bullpen.

A pitcher's ERA, while not as bad as his W/L record, still shares the same kind (if not degree) of pollution.

ERA takes an agnostic view on "pitching to the score".  Therefore a WAR that doesn't including the timing of the runs (either in real-time, or even after the game is over), takes the same view as noted above (a) agnostic or (b) all average.?

***

I posted this on Twitter, but, I think it applies here, since so many people think they know they are right, when the reality is that they only look at the issue through a single lens:

If you think you are right, keep working the problem until you know you are wrong.  Englightenment will be your reward.

(11) Comments • 2013/12/16 • Pitchers

Latest...

COMMENTS

Nov 23 14:15
Layered wOBAcon

Nov 22 22:15
Cy Young Predictor 2024

Oct 28 17:25
Layered Hit Probability breakdown

Oct 15 13:42
Binomial fun: Best-of-3-all-home is equivalent to traditional Best-of-X where X is

Oct 14 14:31
NaiveWAR and VictoryShares

Oct 02 21:23
Component Run Values: TTO and BIP

Oct 02 11:06
FRV v DRS

Sep 28 22:34
Runs Above Average

Sep 16 16:46
Skenes v Webb: Illustrating Replacement Level in WAR

Sep 16 16:43
Sacrifice Steal Attempt

Sep 09 14:47
Can Wheeler win the Cy Young in 2024?

Sep 08 13:39
Small choices, big implications, in WAR

Sep 07 09:00
Why does Baseball Reference love Erick Fedde?

Sep 03 19:42
Re-Leveraging Aaron Judge

Aug 24 14:10
Science of baseball in 1957

THREADS

December 13, 2013
WAR for pitchers on Fangraphs