[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book
is Finally Written!

Read Excerpts & Reviews
E-Book available
as Amazon Kindle or
at iTunes for $9.99.

Hardcopy available at Amazon
SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
Shop Amazon & Support This Blog
RECENT FORUM TOPICS
Jul 12 15:22 Marcels
Apr 16 14:31 Pitch Count Estimators
Mar 12 16:30 Appendix to THE BOOK - THE GORY DETAILS
Jan 29 09:41 NFL Overtime Idea
Jan 22 14:48 Weighting Years for NFL Player Projections
Jan 21 09:18 positional runs in pythagenpat
Oct 20 15:57 DRS: FG vs. BB-Ref

Advanced

Tangotiger Blog

A blog about baseball, hockey, life, and whatever else there is.

Friday, March 29, 2013

WAR 1945

As we recently learned, Fangraphs and BR.com have agreed to a baseline level of 1000 wins (per 4860 team games, or 0.206 wins per team game). 

However, what to do with 1945?  That year, talent level was far below what it would be in 1946, and was below the pre-WWII years.?  Fangraphs maintains the .206 wins per game level for 1945, treating MLB as its own universe.  BR.com however does not, giving out some 25% or 30% fewer wins.  How would you like to see it?

And if you start making exceptions there, how about back in 1914-15, with the rival Federal League? 

And if you make an exception for that, how about the Negro League?  It's not going to surprise you that of players born since 1931 (Mays/Mantle), about three out of every eight superstar players are non-whites.  And, I imagine we'd find something similar to that, that 3/8th of all WAR of players born since 1931 are for non-white players.

Should we therefore limit the number of wins per game in the pre-Jackie era to 5/8ths of .206?  Or, again, do we treat MLB as its own universe?

And what about the pre-modern era?  How do you handle the various leagues of various designations and levels, that would have star players in their mid to late 20s playing in those leagues?

Finally, how to split the wins between the NL and AL in the modern era?  While the AL has unquestionably more talent (per team) over the last 10 years, that's not the case throughout history.  It's pretty easy to figure out the AL/NL differences because we have an unbiased sample: they play each other 10% of the time.  For the prior years, we need to rely on "league-switchers", guys who moved between leagues, and see how their numbers changed.  Of course, those are going to be biased because maybe there's a reason that players switch between leagues (older players move to AL because of DH maybe?).

Anyway, now that we're on the path to trying to standardize the amount of wins available in each league, how far can we take this?

Or, do we want to simply be very lazy, and not think about it at all, because we're too afraid of making a decision, and then having to revisit that decision periodically?

 

Latest...

COMMENTS

Nov 23 14:15
Layered wOBAcon

Nov 22 22:15
Cy Young Predictor 2024

Oct 28 17:25
Layered Hit Probability breakdown

Oct 15 13:42
Binomial fun: Best-of-3-all-home is equivalent to traditional Best-of-X where X is

Oct 14 14:31
NaiveWAR and VictoryShares

Oct 02 21:23
Component Run Values: TTO and BIP

Oct 02 11:06
FRV v DRS

Sep 28 22:34
Runs Above Average

Sep 16 16:46
Skenes v Webb: Illustrating Replacement Level in WAR

Sep 16 16:43
Sacrifice Steal Attempt

Sep 09 14:47
Can Wheeler win the Cy Young in 2024?

Sep 08 13:39
Small choices, big implications, in WAR

Sep 07 09:00
Why does Baseball Reference love Erick Fedde?

Sep 03 19:42
Re-Leveraging Aaron Judge

Aug 24 14:10
Science of baseball in 1957

THREADS

March 29, 2013
WAR 1945