[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book
is Finally Written!

Read Excerpts & Reviews
E-Book available
as Amazon Kindle or
at iTunes for $9.99.

Hardcopy available at Amazon
SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
Shop Amazon & Support This Blog
RECENT FORUM TOPICS
Jul 12 15:22 Marcels
Apr 16 14:31 Pitch Count Estimators
Mar 12 16:30 Appendix to THE BOOK - THE GORY DETAILS
Jan 29 09:41 NFL Overtime Idea
Jan 22 14:48 Weighting Years for NFL Player Projections
Jan 21 09:18 positional runs in pythagenpat
Oct 20 15:57 DRS: FG vs. BB-Ref

Advanced

Tangotiger Blog

A blog about baseball, hockey, life, and whatever else there is.

Saturday, March 11, 2017

Updated version of DRA

?First thing, kudos to Jonathan for being meticulous about it.  Secondly, totally agree in terms of using FIP as the baseline, and he says it succinctly at the end.  I would even use an additional baseline, and that is simply strikeouts minus "walks" per PA, where walks is BB-IBB+HBP.  You'd be surprised (shocked?) at how well that does.  Thirdly, the presentation of the three tests is perfect: (a) current RA9, (b) internal reliability, (c) future RA9

So, it's fascinating that DRA can (a) describe current RA9 as well as FIP AND (c) is slightly better than FIP in forecasting AND (b) does so by being more internally consistent (meaning it can better describe why it does so well).  My GUESS is that it underweights HR and overweights SO, but can then counteract that with other data.  So, for describing current RA9, it tried to do WORSE by changing the weights of HR and SO, but then is able to balance that out for current RA9 by using more inputs.  And does so without affect future RA9.  All the while making it more internally consistent.  Just a guess, but that's what I'd do.

One thing this shows is how DIPS will survive (in the form of FIP).  Remember, FIP is nothing more than DIPS, which means the whole idea of FIP I'd consider to be 99% Voros.  Voros is the lawyer that created the DIPS argument, and I'm the paralegal that dots the i's and crosses the t's, with FIP.  I'm sure Voros would like that analogy.

Anyway, the devil is in the details, and I'll be interested to learn about the specific pitchers, and where the value-added comes from.

(1) Comments • 2017/03/11 • Pitchers

Latest...

COMMENTS

Nov 23 14:15
Layered wOBAcon

Nov 22 22:15
Cy Young Predictor 2024

Oct 28 17:25
Layered Hit Probability breakdown

Oct 15 13:42
Binomial fun: Best-of-3-all-home is equivalent to traditional Best-of-X where X is

Oct 14 14:31
NaiveWAR and VictoryShares

Oct 02 21:23
Component Run Values: TTO and BIP

Oct 02 11:06
FRV v DRS

Sep 28 22:34
Runs Above Average

Sep 16 16:46
Skenes v Webb: Illustrating Replacement Level in WAR

Sep 16 16:43
Sacrifice Steal Attempt

Sep 09 14:47
Can Wheeler win the Cy Young in 2024?

Sep 08 13:39
Small choices, big implications, in WAR

Sep 07 09:00
Why does Baseball Reference love Erick Fedde?

Sep 03 19:42
Re-Leveraging Aaron Judge

Aug 24 14:10
Science of baseball in 1957

THREADS

March 11, 2017
Updated version of DRA