[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book
is Finally Written!

Read Excerpts & Reviews
E-Book available
as Amazon Kindle or
at iTunes for $9.99.

Hardcopy available at Amazon
SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
Shop Amazon & Support This Blog
RECENT FORUM TOPICS
Jul 12 15:22 Marcels
Apr 16 14:31 Pitch Count Estimators
Mar 12 16:30 Appendix to THE BOOK - THE GORY DETAILS
Jan 29 09:41 NFL Overtime Idea
Jan 22 14:48 Weighting Years for NFL Player Projections
Jan 21 09:18 positional runs in pythagenpat
Oct 20 15:57 DRS: FG vs. BB-Ref

Advanced

Tangotiger Blog

A blog about baseball, hockey, life, and whatever else there is.

Friday, April 19, 2013

Pitching to the score… or not

Dave looks at CC.  What is interesting is his huge change in HR rate, but as Dave notes, that's a tradeoff, because overall, it's the same impact.  This is like protection, where we showed in The Book that yes, pitchers and batters behave differently depending on who is on deck.  But the IMPACT of that is really close to no difference.  Everyone is just getting to the same spot in different ways.  This is even most obvious with things like 3-0 counts and man on 3B and less than 2 outs.  Yes, obviously, everyone involved is going to behave much differently.  But, is there something special about a particular context that makes a particular player "better" in terms of taking advantage of that situation?

The implication of protection and pitching to the score is that the players are getting better than expected results.  And we don't see that.

***

CC gives up runs at 80% of the league average, so his 1104 runs implies that he saved 276 runs.

His RE24 is a measure of how he does in terms of pitching to the base-out situation.  His RE24 is +284 runs.  That it's virtually the same as just looking at his ERA means that we've got nothing new to learn here.  ("All hail RE24!")

And 276 runs translates to about +28 wins.  His WPA is +28.5 wins.  WPA is loosely based on how well someone pitches to the inning-score.  Again, this shows that CC is nothing special here.

But, really, we didn't have to go much further than the data Dave presented.  That data is easier to understand.  The RE24 and WPA is a bit harder, but it's much more concise.  Of all the pitchers Reynolds could have chosen, I don't think he could have chosen a worse example of a pitcher who pitches to the score.

I do love though that CC's HR rate is much different, even though overall, it's to the same effect.

?

(7) Comments • 2013/04/22 • Run_Win_Expectancy

Latest...

COMMENTS

Nov 23 14:15
Layered wOBAcon

Nov 22 22:15
Cy Young Predictor 2024

Oct 28 17:25
Layered Hit Probability breakdown

Oct 15 13:42
Binomial fun: Best-of-3-all-home is equivalent to traditional Best-of-X where X is

Oct 14 14:31
NaiveWAR and VictoryShares

Oct 02 21:23
Component Run Values: TTO and BIP

Oct 02 11:06
FRV v DRS

Sep 28 22:34
Runs Above Average

Sep 16 16:46
Skenes v Webb: Illustrating Replacement Level in WAR

Sep 16 16:43
Sacrifice Steal Attempt

Sep 09 14:47
Can Wheeler win the Cy Young in 2024?

Sep 08 13:39
Small choices, big implications, in WAR

Sep 07 09:00
Why does Baseball Reference love Erick Fedde?

Sep 03 19:42
Re-Leveraging Aaron Judge

Aug 24 14:10
Science of baseball in 1957

THREADS

April 19, 2013
Pitching to the score… or not