[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book
is Finally Written!

Read Excerpts & Reviews
E-Book available
as Amazon Kindle or
at iTunes for $9.99.

Hardcopy available at Amazon
SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
Shop Amazon & Support This Blog
RECENT FORUM TOPICS
Jul 12 15:22 Marcels
Apr 16 14:31 Pitch Count Estimators
Mar 12 16:30 Appendix to THE BOOK - THE GORY DETAILS
Jan 29 09:41 NFL Overtime Idea
Jan 22 14:48 Weighting Years for NFL Player Projections
Jan 21 09:18 positional runs in pythagenpat
Oct 20 15:57 DRS: FG vs. BB-Ref

Advanced

Tangotiger Blog

A blog about baseball, hockey, life, and whatever else there is.

Monday, December 08, 2014

Path to Game Score 2.0 - part 1 of 3

?This one is going to be an easy one.  If we think of Game Score along a wins scale, where "50" means 50% or .500, then 60 would mean .600, or +.10 wins above average, which is equivalent to +1 run above average.  That is, going from 50 to 60 (a gain of 10 points) would be based on being 1 run above average.  Hence, a 10:1 ratio of Game Score points to runs.

If the league average runs allowed per 9 IP (RA9) is 4.32, we'd assign a value of "50" to that.  And an RA9 of 3.32 would be "60", and 2.32 would be "70".  And going the other way, 5.32 would be a "40", and so on.  Essentially 1 run is 10 Game Score points.

Naturally, we don't want to assign a starting pitcher a Game Score of 50 if he manages to be league-average while throwing 2 innings.  Enter: WAR.  Rather than make the starting point a "50", we can make it something lower, and get up to a 50 with a league average performance.  The WAR level for a pitcher is roughly 5.40 RA9, meaning 5.4 runs per 27 outs, or 0.2 runs per out.  That is, each out advances us forward 0.2 runs, while each run allowed moves us back 1 run.

Or, in the above scale of 10:1, an out is worth +2 points while a run is worth -10 points.  Since a league average starting pitcher would give up around 2.88 runs per 6IP, he would earn +36 points for his 18 outs and lose 28.8 points for his 2.88 runs, for a total of +7.2 points.  Since we want him to be at 50, that would mean the replacement level point would be 42.8 game score points, which we'll round to 43.

A 9-inning shutout would therefore give us 54 points for the outs, no penalty for the runs, and a starting point of 43, for a total of 97 points.  In order to get close to a 0, you'd have a pitcher with 3 innings (+18 points) giving up 6 runs (-60 points), which when added to our starting point of 43 gives us 1 point.
() Comments

Latest...

COMMENTS

Nov 23 14:15
Layered wOBAcon

Nov 22 22:15
Cy Young Predictor 2024

Oct 28 17:25
Layered Hit Probability breakdown

Oct 15 13:42
Binomial fun: Best-of-3-all-home is equivalent to traditional Best-of-X where X is

Oct 14 14:31
NaiveWAR and VictoryShares

Oct 02 21:23
Component Run Values: TTO and BIP

Oct 02 11:06
FRV v DRS

Sep 28 22:34
Runs Above Average

Sep 16 16:46
Skenes v Webb: Illustrating Replacement Level in WAR

Sep 16 16:43
Sacrifice Steal Attempt

Sep 09 14:47
Can Wheeler win the Cy Young in 2024?

Sep 08 13:39
Small choices, big implications, in WAR

Sep 07 09:00
Why does Baseball Reference love Erick Fedde?

Sep 03 19:42
Re-Leveraging Aaron Judge

Aug 24 14:10
Science of baseball in 1957

THREADS

December 08, 2014
Path to Game Score 2.0 - part 1 of 3