[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book
is Finally Written!

Read Excerpts & Reviews
E-Book available
as Amazon Kindle or
at iTunes for $9.99.

Hardcopy available at Amazon
SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
Shop Amazon & Support This Blog
RECENT FORUM TOPICS
Jul 12 15:22 Marcels
Apr 16 14:31 Pitch Count Estimators
Mar 12 16:30 Appendix to THE BOOK - THE GORY DETAILS
Jan 29 09:41 NFL Overtime Idea
Jan 22 14:48 Weighting Years for NFL Player Projections
Jan 21 09:18 positional runs in pythagenpat
Oct 20 15:57 DRS: FG vs. BB-Ref

Advanced

Tangotiger Blog

A blog about baseball, hockey, life, and whatever else there is.

Tuesday, July 16, 2013

Jason Kipnis, voice of reason

In talking about Davis and the HR record:

“Definitely the old-school guys are gonna say 61,” Indians second baseman Jason Kipnis said. “But I almost might have to join them on 73, because when you start talking to players around the game, guys who played before you, I don’t think [Bonds] was the only one doing [PEDs]. I don’t think the pitchers were guilt-free, either, from what I hear. He was a product of his era. That’s what was going around the game at the time.

“You can put an asterisk there. You can do whatever you want. Fact is, the guy hit 73 home runs. Steroids were not hitting the baseball for him. It was impressive to watch, and you can’t take it away from him. The guy did it.”

***?

So, I would say that if we want an official record, then MLB has to decide how it want to handle the record officially.  The Olympics for example not only removed Ben Johnson's then-record breaking performance from the record-leader books, it also removed his performance from existence.  There's no half-measures there: either it's recognized as a valid performance, or it's not.

They do however have one little thing: wind-aided performances.  In those cases, if the wind (or altitude I guess... sorry Coors) is such as to confer too great an advantage, they still recognize the performance (since all the participants were part of the environment), but not for the leaderboards.  These things however are established at the time the event occurs.

MLB therefore could follow that path.  They could simply say that they recognize the performances in say 199x-200y (x=whatever, and y=year before testing) for the players and teams, but won't recognize them for the leaderboards.  And this is not only HR, but ERA, K, wins, batting average, steals, etc.  The whole thing. 

Goodbye Pedro, Goodbye Mariano, Goodbye Yanks World Series Titles.  Goonight Moon.

Since MLB has not taken any such actions, and there's no fan movement otherwise, the media should be responsible enough not to create the news by writing articles they get paid for and having other media members comment on them by writing their own articles that they get paid for.  It should rest in the caverns of blogs and tweets, and not as some topical news item.

(5) Comments • 2013/07/18 • History

Latest...

COMMENTS

Nov 23 14:15
Layered wOBAcon

Nov 22 22:15
Cy Young Predictor 2024

Oct 28 17:25
Layered Hit Probability breakdown

Oct 15 13:42
Binomial fun: Best-of-3-all-home is equivalent to traditional Best-of-X where X is

Oct 14 14:31
NaiveWAR and VictoryShares

Oct 02 21:23
Component Run Values: TTO and BIP

Oct 02 11:06
FRV v DRS

Sep 28 22:34
Runs Above Average

Sep 16 16:46
Skenes v Webb: Illustrating Replacement Level in WAR

Sep 16 16:43
Sacrifice Steal Attempt

Sep 09 14:47
Can Wheeler win the Cy Young in 2024?

Sep 08 13:39
Small choices, big implications, in WAR

Sep 07 09:00
Why does Baseball Reference love Erick Fedde?

Sep 03 19:42
Re-Leveraging Aaron Judge

Aug 24 14:10
Science of baseball in 1957

THREADS

July 16, 2013
Jason Kipnis, voice of reason